Modelación experimental y analítica del comportamiento dinámico de un suelo blando

dc.contributor.advisorMurillo Feo, Carol Andreaspa
dc.contributor.advisorBernal Granados, Gabriel Andrésspa
dc.contributor.authorVanegas Camero, José Miguelspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T15:26:48Zspa
dc.date.available2020-10-01T15:26:48Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-09-20spa
dc.description.abstractSe realizaron cinco ensayos en mesa vibratoria de un modelo físico compuesto por un suelo blando fabricado en laboratorio con caolín y un oscilador de un grado de libertad, instrumentando el modelo con acelerómetros a lo largo del perfil de suelo y en el oscilador. También se realizaron modelos analíticos, donde se modelaron las mismas condiciones y parámetros del modelo físico, utilizando el método lineal equivalente, método Thomson Haskell y diez diferentes modelos de degradación de suelos para evaluar la respuesta dinámica (movimiento) del modelo frente a las excitaciones generadas durante los ensayos. Al final del trabajo se contrastaron los resultados de la modelación experimental y analítica, se evaluó la variabilidad de la respuesta analítica en función de los modelos de degradación y se definió cual modelo de degradación representó mejor la respuesta experimental.spa
dc.description.abstractFive tests were carried out on a shaking table of a physical model made up of a soil made in the laboratory with kaolin and an oscillator with one degree of freedom, instrumenting the model with accelerometers along the soil profile and in the oscillator. Analytical models were also carried out, where the same conditions and parameters of the physical model were modeled, using the equivalent linear method, the Thomson Haskell method, and ten different soil degradation models to evaluate the dynamic response (movement) of the model generated by the same excitations than the experimental model. At the end of this work, the results of the experimental and analytical modeling were compared, the variability of the analytical response was evaluated based on the degradation models and it was defined which degradation model represented better the experimental response.spa
dc.description.additionalLínea de Investigación: Modelación y análisis en geotecniaspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent122spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78516
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Geotecniaspa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Qaisi, Z. (2016). Optimal design of concrete gravity dams of random soil. PhD Thesis, University of Technology, Baghdad.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl, M., Emeriault, F., & Nghiem, H. (2020). On the use of 1 g physical models for ground movements and soil-structure interaction problems. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 12(1), 197–211.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlcaldía Mayor de Bogotá. (1997). Microzonificación Sísmica de Bogotá. Bogotá D.C., Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlcaldía Mayor de Bogotá. (2006). Zonificación de la respuesta sísmica de bogotá para el diseño sismo resistente de edificaciones. Bogotá D.C., Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlcaldía Mayor de Bogotá. (2010). Decreto 523 de 2010 Microzonificación Bogotá. Bogotá D.C., Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlfredo, M., & Rodríguez, O. (2017). Cambios en las propiedades dinámicas del suelo observados en registros de aceleración de pozo. Tesis pregrado. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez-Rozo, D. C., Sánchez-Molina, J., Corpas-Iglesias, F. A., & Gelves, J. F. (2018). Characteristics of the raw materials used by the companies of the ceramic sector of the metropolitan area of Cúcuta (Colombia). Boletin de La Sociedad Espanola de Ceramica y Vidrio, 57(6), 247–256.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez, E. (1989). Respuesta dinámica de suelos. Revista Física de La Tierra, 1, pp 309-355.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, D. G., & Richart, F. F. (1976). Effect of straining on shear modulus of clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, 102(9):, pp 975-987.spa
dc.relation.referencesAsad, H. H., Shamkhi, M., & Al-hachami, K. (2018). Design, Manufacturing and Testing of Small Shaking Tabl. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7, pp 426-430.spa
dc.relation.referencesAsociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica. (2010). Normas Colombianas de Diseño y Construcción Sismo-Resistente. Bogotá D.C., Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesASTM E8 / E8M-16ae1. (2016). , Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Www.Astm.Org.spa
dc.relation.referencesBairrao, R., & Vaz, C. (2000). Shaking table testing of civil engineering structures–the LNEC 3D simulator experience. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zeland.spa
dc.relation.referencesBalachandran, B., & Magrab, E. (2009). Vibrations (2nd ed.). Cengage learning.spa
dc.relation.referencesBao, Z., Yong, Y., & Haitao, Y. (2016). Multi-point shaking table test design for long tunnels under non-uniform seismic loading. Tunelling and Underground Space Technology, 59, 114–126.spa
dc.relation.referencesBernal, G. (2014). Strong Motion Analyst. Computer program for seismological data processing. Next-generation CAPRA Software, Ingeniar CAD/CAE Ltda. Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesChau et al. (2009). Nonlinear seismic soil-pile-structure interactions: Shaking table tests and FEM analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(2), 300–310.spa
dc.relation.referencesChávez, F. J., & Montalva, G. A. (2014). Efectos de sitio para Ingenieros Geotécnicos , estudio del valle Parkway Introducción. Obras y Proyectos, 6, pp 6-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesChopra, A. K. (1995). Dynamics of Structures-Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Universidad de California, Berkeley. USA: Prentice Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesChowdhury, I., & Dasgupta, S. (2009). Dynamics of Structures and Foundations. London: CRC Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesClemente, O. J. G., Díaz, M. B., Del Valle Millán Boadas, Z., & Carrera, J. M. (2014). Caracterización de las arenas y arcillas minerales de los depósitos de canal y planicie de inundación del río Portuguesa, Venezuela. Investigaciones Geograficas, 85, 18–32.spa
dc.relation.referencesDarendeli, M. (2001). Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. PhD Thesis. University of Austin Texas.spa
dc.relation.referencesDouglas, J. (2018). Ground motion prediction equations 1964-2018. Universidad de Strathelyde.spa
dc.relation.referencesElia, G., & Rouainia, M. (2016). Investigating the cyclic behaviour of clays using a kinematic hardening soil model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 88, pp 399-411.spa
dc.relation.referencesEspinosa, M. (2017). Análisis De La Demanda Sísmica De Diferentes Tipos De Sismos En Base A La Atenuación De Alta Frecuencia. Tesis pregrado. Universidad de Chile.spa
dc.relation.referencesFOPAE. (2010). Zonificación De La Respuesta Sísmica De Bogotá Para El Diseño Sismo Resistente De Edificaciones. Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalván García, E., & Auvinet Guichard, G. (2011). Modelo geoestadístico y geotécnico de la generación de emanaciones de hidrocarburos en el fondo marino de la Sonda de Campeche. Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, XII Núm. 2, pp 223-234.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Florez, M. (2006). Propuesta de clasificación geotécnica del “ Efecto Sitio ” ( Amplificación Sísmica ) de las formaciones geológicas de la Región de Murcia. pp 39-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Reyes, L. E. (1998). Dinámica estructural aplicada al diseño sísmico. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Universidad de los Andes.spa
dc.relation.referencesGasparre, A. (2005). Advanced laboratory characterisation of London Clay. PhD Thesis. Imperial College London.spa
dc.relation.referencesGazetas, G., & Mylonakis, G. (1998). Seismic soil-structure interaction: new evidence and emerging issues. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, 1119–1174. Reston, Virginia.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeorgiannou et. al. (1991). Static and dynamic measurements of undrained stiffness on natural overconsolidated clays. Proceedings 10th European Conference on Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, 91–95. Rotterdam, Netherlands.spa
dc.relation.referencesGhezelbash, A., Beyer, K., Dolatshahi, K., & Yekrangnia, M. (2020). Shake table test of a masonry building retrofitted with shotcrete. Engineering Structures, 219(110912).spa
dc.relation.referencesGodoy, C. A. (2013). Estudio de la respuesta de sitio en Santiago utilizando el método lineal equivalente. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad de Chile.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoktepe, F., Sahin, M., & Celebi, E. (2020). Small shaking table testing and numerical analysis of free-field site response and soil-structure oscillation under seismic loading. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 79, 2949–2969.spa
dc.relation.referencesGroholski, D. R., Hashash, Y. M. A., & Matasovic, N. (2014). Learning of pore pressure response and dynamic soil behavior from downhole array measurements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 61–62, 40–56.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuobo, W., Mingzhi, Y., Yu, M., Jun, W., & Yaxi, W. (2018). Experimental study on seismic response of underground tunnel-soil-surface structure interaction system. 76(September 2017), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.015spa
dc.relation.referencesHaskell, N. A. (1953). The dispersion of surface waves on multilayered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 43(1):1–18.spa
dc.relation.referencesHurtado Gomez, J. E. (2000). Introducción a la dinámica de estructuras (1st ed.). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesI. Ishibashi, & Zhang, X. (1993). Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils and Foundations, 33, 182–191.spa
dc.relation.referencesInman, D. (2001). Engineering Vibration (2nd ed.). New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesINVIAS. (2013). Normas y especificaciones 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesIshihara, K. (1996). Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics. Oxford science publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesJing, J., Clifton, C., Roy, K., & Lim, J. (2020). Three-storey modular steel building with a novel slider device: Shake table tests on a scaled down model and numerical investigation. Thin-Walled Structures, 155, 106932.spa
dc.relation.referencesKontoe, S. (2012). Comparative study of stiffness reduction and damping curves. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal.spa
dc.relation.referencesKravhenko, N., Silacheva, N., & Kulbayeva, U. (2014). Seismic ground motion variations resulting from site conditions. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 5(2), 9–15.spa
dc.relation.referencesMalizia, J. P., & Shakoor, A. (2018). Effect of water content and density on strength and deformation behavior of clay soils. Engineering Geology, 244, pp 125-131.spa
dc.relation.referencesMansour, M. F., & Clay, P. (2018). Constitutive behaviour of Port-Said Clay under seismic and small strain static conditions. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), pp 2983-2991.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeehan, T. (2018). Evolution of the propagator matrix method and its implementation in seismology. 83, c13–c26.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeymand, P. J. (1998). Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay. PhD Thesis. University of California, Berkeley.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiura, K., Kobayashi, S., & Yoshida, N. (1972). Equivalent linear analysis considering large strains. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp 1-8. Auckland, New Zeland.spa
dc.relation.referencesNing, M., Wu, H., Ma, H., Xijong, W., & Wang, G. (2019). Examining dynamic soil pressures and the effectiveness of different pile structures inside reinforced slopes using shaking table tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, pp 293-303.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlivares, L., & Quintanta, M. (2014). Análisis lineal equivalente de la respuesta sísmica de sitio en los recintos: Rubén Darío-Managua, FAREM-Chontales y FAREM-Carazo, de la UNANManagua. Universidad Autónoma de Nicaragua.spa
dc.relation.referencesOtsubo, M., Towhata, I., Hayashida, T., Liu, B., & Goto, S. (2016). Shaking table tests on liquefaction mitigation of embedded lifelines by backfilling with recycled materials. Soils and Foundations, 56(3), 365–378.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, E. (1869). De l’équilibre des solides élastiques. Comptes Rendus à l’Académie Des Sciences, 68.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrasad, S., Towhata, I., Chandradhara, G., & Nanjundaswamy, G. (2004). Shaking table tests in earthquake geotechnical engineering. Current Science, 87, pp 1398-1404.spa
dc.relation.referencesProulx, J., & Paultre, P. (1997). Experimental and numerical investigation of dam-reservior-foundation interaction for a large gravity dam. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(01), pp 90-105.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamberg, W., & Osgood, W. (1943). Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters.pdf. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical note No. 902.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, G., & Ángel, T. (2017). Correlaciones entre algunas variables geotécnicas y velocidades de onda compresiva (Vp) y de corte (Vs). Tesis Pregrado. Universidad Eafit.spa
dc.relation.referencesRampello, S., & Silvestri, F. (1993). The stress-strain behaviour of natural and reconstituted samples of two overconsolidated clays. Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, A. Anagostopoulos et Al. (Eds.), 769–778. Rotterdam, Netherlands.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz Wilches, B. (1945). Determinaciones magnéticas y gravimétricas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carta Del Observatorio de Geofísica, 465–468.spa
dc.relation.referencesScience Learning Hub. (2015). Earth waves. Retrieved from https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/images/353-earth-wavesspa
dc.relation.referencesShiomi, T., Chan, A., Nukui, Y., Hijikata, K., & Koyama, K. (2000). Comparison of equivalent linear analysis and nonlinear analysis for a liquefacton problem. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zeland.spa
dc.relation.referencesSu, L., Tang, L., Ling, X., Liu, C., & Zhang, X. (2016). Pile response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: A shake-table investigation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 82, 196–204.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuarez Alfaro, M. (2004). Modelos de comportamiento dinámico para las arcillas de Bogotá. Tesis Maestría. Universidad de los Andes.spa
dc.relation.referencesSubramaniam, P., & Banerjee, S. (2013). Shear modulus degradation model for cohesive soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 53, 210–216.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, C., Dar, A., & Crewe, A. (1995). Shaking table modelling of seismic geotechnical problems. 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineers, 441–446. Vienna, Austria.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomson, W. T. (1950). Transmission of Elastic Waves through a Stratified Solid Medium. Journal of Applied Physics, 21(2):89–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesThorby, D. (2008). Structural Dynamics and Vibration Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesTinawi, R., Leger, P., & Lecler, M. (2000). Seismic response of gravity dams-correlations between shaking table tests and numerical analysis. 12th World Confernce on Earthquake Engineering, 1–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesUNAM. (2005). Capítulo iii Determinación de Efectos de Sitio. 36–68.spa
dc.relation.referencesVardanega, P. J., & Bolton, M. D. (2014). Stiffness of Clays and Silts : Modeling Considerations. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139, pp 1575-1589.spa
dc.relation.referencesVerdugo, R. (2000). Dinámica de Suelos: Amplificación sísmica. CI-79F DINAMICA DE SUELOS, 1–37.spa
dc.relation.referencesVerdugo, R., Ochoa-Cornejo, F., Gonzalez, J., & Vallardes, G. (2018). Site effect and site classification in areas with large earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.spa
dc.relation.referencesVerruijt, A. (2010). An Introduction to Soil Dynamics (Springer). Delft University of Technology.spa
dc.relation.referencesVucetic, M., & Dobry, R. (1991). Effect on soil plasticity in cyclyc response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117(1), 89–107.spa
dc.relation.referencesZampieri, A. (2016). Seismic Behavior Analysis of Concrete Highway Bridges Based on Field Monitoring and Shaking Table Test Data. Phd Thesis. Columbia University.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, J., Andrus, R., & Juang, H. (2005). Normalized Shear Modulus and Material Damping Ratio Relationships. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol 131, 453–464.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, X., Chen, H., Li, X., Yan, W., & Chen, S. (2017). Shaking table test of immersed tunnel considering the geological condition. Engineering Geology, 227, 93–107.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Z., & Qin, X. (2017). Experimental study on damping characteristics of soil-structure interaction system based on shaking table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98(September 2016), 183–190.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhi, Z., Xiajoun, L., Riqing, L., & Chenning, S. (2019). Shaking table tests and numerical simulations of a small radius curved bridge considering SSI effect. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 118, pp 1-18.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc550 - Ciencias de la tierraspa
dc.subject.proposalModelación físicaspa
dc.subject.proposalPhysical modelingeng
dc.subject.proposalMesa vibratoriaspa
dc.subject.proposalShaking table testeng
dc.subject.proposalComportamiento dinámicospa
dc.subject.proposalSeismic responseeng
dc.subject.proposalModelos de degradaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalSoil degradation modelseng
dc.titleModelación experimental y analítica del comportamiento dinámico de un suelo blandospa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1018456463.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
3.64 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.8 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: