Biogeografía de la conservación de Cynophalla (DC.) J.Presl (Capparaceae)

dc.contributor.advisorPerez Zabala, Jorge Andrésspa
dc.contributor.authorAguirre De la Hoz, Aura Carolinaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T14:34:29Zspa
dc.date.available2021-02-19T14:34:29Zspa
dc.date.issued2019-12-07spa
dc.description.abstractThe genus Cynophalla that belongs to the Capparaceae family, consist of approximately 17 species distributed mostly in the Neotropics. It is one of the most distinctive genera of the family for its well known taxonomy, putative monophyly and floristic prevalence within the tropical dry forest biome. This biome has been recognized by its high rate of diversity, endemicity and floristic exchange, in addition of being an important source of ecosystem services to many communities in Latin America. The accelerated disappearance of this biome occurring during the last decades could eventually lead to the extinction of several species of Cynophalla and other specialized taxa, so it is urgent to design strategies for the conservation of this group. Following biogeographic study methods for conservation purposes, it is proposed here the use of data of occurrences of each species, environmental mapping information and Maxent modeling software, in order to model and compare ecological niches between species and eventually propose conservation priorities for Cynophalla in all its extension. This study was then intended to determine the geographical and ecological distribution of the species of the genus Cynophalla, to compare the ecological niches among species and to establish the current state of conservation of the species following the UICN criteria as a support of guidelines for future actions.spa
dc.description.abstractEl género Cynophalla, perteneciente a la familia Capparaceae, con aproximadamente 17 especies distribuidas en la región biogeográfica del neotrópico; es uno de los más distintivos de la familia por su taxonomía, monofília e importancia florística dentro del bosque seco tropical. Este bioma tropical presenta alta tasa de diversidad, endemicidad y recambio florístico, además de ser principal proveedor de servicios ecosistémicos de muchas comunidades en Latinoamérica. La desaparición de este bosque podría llevar a la extinción de varias especies de Cynophalla y de otros taxones que lo habitan preferencialmente, por lo que es urgente el diseño de estrategias para la conservación de este grupo. Siguiendo métodos biogeográficos con propósitos de conservación, se propone a partir de datos de ocurrencias de cada especie, coberturas ambientales y el software de modelamiento Maxent; plantear, modelar y comparar los nichos ecológicos entre especies con el fin de proponer prioridades de conservación para Cynophalla en toda su extensión. En este estudio se propuso entonces determinar la distribución geográfica y ecológica de las especies del género Cynophalla por medio del análisis comparativo de sus nichos ecológicos y, establecer el estado actual de conservación de las especies, siguiendo los criterios de la UICN, para apoyar el posterior diseño de lineamientos futuros.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent141spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationAguirre De la Hoz, A.C.spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79273
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ciencias Forestalesspa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Ciencias Agrarias - Maestría en Bosques y Conservación Ambientalspa
dc.relation.references1. Abraham de Noir F & S Bravo. 2014. Frutos de leñosas nativas de Argentina. 1a ed.- Santiago del Estero: Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero - UNSE. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales: 68-69 pp.spa
dc.relation.references2. Aguirre D & Ruiz Zapata T. 2017. Capparaceae Juss. del departamento del Atlántico, Colombia. Ciencia en Desarrollo 8 (1): 51-69.spa
dc.relation.references3. Al-Shehbaz I. 1988. Capparaceae. In Flora of the lesses Antilles Leeward and Windward island dicotyledoneae: Part 1. 4: 293-310.spa
dc.relation.references4. Angulo D, Ruiz-Sanchez E & Sosa V. Niche conservatism in the Mesoamerican seasonal tropical dry forest orchid Barkeria (Orchidaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 26 (2): 991-1010.spa
dc.relation.references5. Anzótegui L M, S S Garralla, L R Mautino, D Prado. 2019. Evolución de Bosques Estacionales Secos Neotropicales, Chaco y Cerrado en el Neógeno del centronorte de Argentina. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina 19(1): 7–17.spa
dc.relation.references6. Balvanera P. 2012. Los servicios ecosistémicos que ofrecen los bosques tropicales. Ecosistemas 21 (1-2): 136-147.spa
dc.relation.references7. Banda et al. (Dryflor). 2016. Plant diversity patterns in neotropical dry forests and their conservation implications. Sciencie 353: 1383-1387.spa
dc.relation.references8. Barve et al. 2011. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecological Modelling 222 (11): 1810-1819.spa
dc.relation.references9. Bentham G & J D Hooker 1862. Genera Plantarun. Londres, Herbariis kewensibus servata. 454p.spa
dc.relation.references10. Blair M E et al. 2013. Ecological divergence and speciation between lemur (Eulemur) sister species in Madagascar. Evol. Biol. 26: 1790–1801.spa
dc.relation.references11. Broennimann O et al. 2012. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 21 (4): 481-497.spa
dc.relation.references12. Caviers L, M Arroyo, P Posadas, C Marticorena, O Matthei, R Rodríguez, F Squeo & G Arancio. 2002. Identification of priority areas for conservation in an arid zone: application of parsimony analysis of endemicity in the vascular flora of the Antofagasta region, northern Chile. Biodiversity & Conservation, 11 (7): 1301-1311.spa
dc.relation.references13. Cornejo X & H H Iltis 2012. Capparaceae en: Flora de Jalisco y área colindante. Fascículo 25. México, Universidad de Guadalajara. 65p.spa
dc.relation.references14. Cornejo X. 2011. Capparaceae. In: León-Yánez S, R Valencia, N Pitman, L Endara, C Ulloa Ulloa & H Navarrete (eds.) Libro rojo de las plantas endémicas del Ecuador, 2ª edición. Publicaciones del Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.spa
dc.relation.references15. Cornejo X & H H Iltis. 2010. Lectotypification and a new combination in Cynophalla (Capparaceae). Rodriguesia 61: 153-155.spa
dc.relation.references16. Cornejo X. 2009. Neotropical Capparaceae. In: Milliken W, B Klitgrd & A Baracat. Neotropikey - Interactive key and information resources for flowering plants of the Neotropics. Disponible en: http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/neotropikey/families/Capparaceae.htmspa
dc.relation.references17. Cornejo X & H H Iltis 2008. New combinations in South American Capparaceae. Harvard Pap. Bot. 13(1): 117-120.spa
dc.relation.references18. Cornejo X & H H Iltis. 2006. New combinations in Capparaceae sensu stricto for flora of Ecuador. Harvard Pap. Bot. 11(1):17-18spa
dc.relation.references19. Cornejo X, C Espinoza & N Pitman. 2003. Capparis heterophylla. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2003: e.T43565A10806643. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2003.RLTS.T43565A10806643.enspa
dc.relation.references20. Cumana L. 2003. La familia Capparaceae depositada en el Herbario IRBR de los estados Anzoátegui y Sucre, Venezuela. Saber 15(1-2): 15-22.spa
dc.relation.references21. Chase J & M Leibold. 2003. Ecological Niche. Linking classical and contemporary approaches Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.references22. Crisci J V, Katinas L y Posadas P. 2003. Historical biogeography. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 263.spa
dc.relation.references23. Crisp M et al. 2009. Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 458: 754–756.spa
dc.relation.references24. De Candolle A P 1824. Prodomus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. París. 748p.spa
dc.relation.references25. De Queiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56(6): 879-886.spa
dc.relation.references26. Di Cola V et al. 2017. Ecospat: an R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions. Ecography 40: 774-787.spa
dc.relation.references27. Dodson C H, A H Gentry & F M Valverde Badillo. 1985. Fl. Jauneche 1–512. Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito.spa
dc.relation.references28. Dodson C H & A H Gentry. 1978. Flora of the Río Palenque Science Center: Los Ríos Province, Ecuador. Selbyana 4(1–6): i–xxx, 1–628.spa
dc.relation.references29. Donoghue M. 2008. A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity. PNAS 105 (1): 11549-11555.spa
dc.relation.references30. Dugand A. 1968. Acerca de unas Capparis de la flora colombiana. Caldasia 47(5): 219-229.spa
dc.relation.references31. Dugand A. 1941. El género Capparis en Colombia. Caldasia 1(2):29-54.spa
dc.relation.references32. Eichler A 1865. Capparideae. Págs. 238-292 en: C De Martius & A Eichler (eds.). Flora Brasiliensis. Vol. 13. Lipsiae.spa
dc.relation.references33. Elith J et al. 2010. A statistical explanation of Maxent for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17(1): 43-57spa
dc.relation.references34. Elton C. 1927. Animal ecology. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.spa
dc.relation.references35. Etter et al. 2017. Lista Roja de Ecosistemas de Colombia. Bogotá D. C. Disponible en: https://iucnrle.org/static/media/uploads/references/published-assessments/Brochures/brochure_lre_colombia_v_2.0.pdfspa
dc.relation.references36. Galetti L, V Mogni, L Oakley, R Toby Pennington & D Prado 2016. Cynophalla polyantha (Capparaceae), Nuevo registro pagra la flora argentina. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 51 (2): 373-378.spa
dc.relation.references37. García H, G Corzo, P Isaacs & A Etter 2014. Distribución y estado actual de los remanentes del bioma de bosque seco tropical en Colombia: Insumos para su gestión. 229-251p. In: El bosque seco tropical en Colombia. Pizano C & H García (eds.). 2014. Bogotá, IAvH. 349p.spa
dc.relation.references38. Geng-Ping Z, L Hui-Qi, L Zhao, M Liang Man & L Qiang. 2016. Mapping the ecological dimensions and potential distributions of endangered relic shrubs in western Ordos biodiversity center. Scientific Reports 6: 26268. DOI: 10.1038/srep26268spa
dc.relation.references39. Gentry A 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Seasonally dry tropical forests. Bullock S, H Mooney & E Medina (eds.). Cambrigde University Press, New York. 146-194p.spa
dc.relation.references40. GeoCat. 2019. Consultado el 25 de Abril del 2019. Disponible en http://geocat.kew.orgspa
dc.relation.references41. Graham C, Ferrier S, Huettman F, Moritz C & Peterson A T. 2004. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19 (9): 497-503.spa
dc.relation.references42. Grinnell J. 1917. The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. Auk 34:427–433.spa
dc.relation.references43. Hall J. 2008. Systematics of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using plastid DNA sequence data. Botany 86: 682-696.spa
dc.relation.references44. Hall J, J Sytsma & H H Iltis. 2002. Phylogeny of Capparaceae and Brassicaceae based on Chloroplast sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 89 (11): 1826-1842. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.11.1826spa
dc.relation.references45. Hartshorn G. 2002. Capítulo 3: Biogeografía de los bosques neotropicales. En: Ecología y Conservación de Bosques Neotropicales. Guariguata M & G Kattan (eds.). Libro Universitario Regional, Cartago, Costa Rica. 59-81p.spa
dc.relation.references46. Harvey P H & M Pagel. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford.spa
dc.relation.references47. Hassler M. 2019. World Plants: Synonymic Checklists of the Vascular Plants of the World (version Nov 2018). In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2019 Annual Checklist (Roskov Y., Ower G., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Bailly N., Kirk P.M., Bourgoin T., DeWalt R.E., Decock W., Nieukerken E. van, Zarucchi J., Penev L., eds.). Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019. Species 2000: Naturalis, Leiden, the Netherlands. ISSN 2405-884X.spa
dc.relation.references48. Hawkins B A, M A Rodríguez & S G Weller. 2011. Global angiosperm family richness revisited: linking ecology and evolution to climate. Journal of Biogeography 38 (7): 1253-1266.spa
dc.relation.references49. Hengl T et al. 2017. SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0169748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748spa
dc.relation.references50. Herazo F, J Mercado & H Mendoza. 2017. Estructura y Composición Florística del Bosque Seco Tropical en los Montes de María (Sucre - Colombia). Ciencia en Desarrollo 8 (1): 71-82spa
dc.relation.references51. Hettwer Giehl E L & J A Jarenkow. 2012. Niche conservatism and the differences in species richness at the transition of tropical and subtropical climates in South America. Ecography 35 (10): 933-943.spa
dc.relation.references52. Holdridge L. 1967. Life zone ecology. San José, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center. 216p.spa
dc.relation.references53. Hutchinson G E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Springs Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22:415–427.spa
dc.relation.references54. Iltis H H. 1978. Studies in the Capparidaceae—XIV. Capparis ecuadorica, a new species. Selbyana 2 (2–3): 303–307.spa
dc.relation.references55. Iltis H & X Cornejo. 2005. Studies in Capparaceae XXII. Capparis sclerophylla, a novelty from Arid Coastal Peru and Ecuador. Novon 15: 429-437.spa
dc.relation.references56. Janzen D H. 1988. Tropical dry forests: The most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In E. O. Wilson (ed.). Biodiversity: 130–137. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.spa
dc.relation.references57. Jepson P & S Canney. 2001. Biodiversity hotspots: hot for what? Global Ecology and Biogeography 10: 225–227.spa
dc.relation.references58. Kramer-Schadt S et al. 2013. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions 19(11):1366-1379.spa
dc.relation.references59. Kerr J T. 1997. Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conservation biology 11 (5): 1094-1100.spa
dc.relation.references60. Kerkhoff A, P Moriarty & M D Weiser. 2014. The latitudinal species richness gradient in New World woody angiosperms is consistent with the tropical conservatism hypothesis. PNAS 111 (22): 8125-8130spa
dc.relation.references61. Kerr J T. 1997. Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conservation biology 11 (5): 1094-1100.spa
dc.relation.references62. Kolanowska M, Grochocka E & Konowalik K. 2017. Phylogenetic climatic niche conservatism and evolution of climatic suitability in Neotropical Angraecinae (Vandeae, Orchidaceae) and their closest African relatives. PeerJ 5: e3328. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3328spa
dc.relation.references63. Lebrija-Trejos E, F Bongers, E Pérez-García & J Meave. 2008. Successional change and resilience of a very dry tropical deciduous forest following shifting agricultura. Biotropica 40 (4): 422–431.spa
dc.relation.references64. Linares-Palomino R, R T Pennington, & Bridgewater S. 2003. The phytogeography of the seasonally dry tropical forests in Equatorial Pacific South America. Candollea 58: 473-499.spa
dc.relation.references65. Linares-Palomino R, A Oliveira-Filho & R Toby Pennington 2011. Neotropical seasonally dry forests: Diversity, Endemism, and Biogeography of woody plants. 3-21p. In: Seasonally dry tropical forests: Ecology and Conservation. Dirzo R, H Young, H. Mooney & G Ceballos. Island Press, Washingtonspa
dc.relation.references66. Lobo J M, Jiménez-valverde A & Real R. 2008. AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17 (2): 145-151.spa
dc.relation.references67. MacArthur R H. 1969. The theory of the niche. In Population biology and evolution. Ed. R. C. Lewontin, 159–176. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.spa
dc.relation.references68. Maciel-Mata C A, N Manríquez-Morán, P Octavio-Aguilar, G Sánchez-Rojas. 2015. El área de distribución de las especies: revisión del concepto. Acta universitaria 25 (2): 3-19spa
dc.relation.references69. Mateo R, A Felicísimo & J Muñoz. 2011.Modelos de distribución de especies: Una revisión sintética. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 84: 217-240.spa
dc.relation.references70. Mendoza-C H. 1999. Estructura y riqueza florística del bosque seco tropical en la región Caribe y el Valle del río Magdalena, Colombia. Caldasia 21 (1): 70-94spa
dc.relation.references71. Miles L et al. 2006. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. J. Biogeogr. 33:491–505spa
dc.relation.references72. Morrone J J. 2014. Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. 110p.spa
dc.relation.references73. Morrone J J. 2001a. Biogeografía de América Latina y el Caribe. M&T–Manuales & Tesis SEA, vol. 3. Zaragoza. 148 pp.spa
dc.relation.references74. Morrone J J. 2001b. Toward a cladistic model of the Caribbean: Delimitation of áreas of endemism. Caldasia 23(1): 43-76.spa
dc.relation.references75. Morrone J J. 2000. What is the Chacoan subregion? Neotropica, 46: 51-68spa
dc.relation.references76. Müller P. 1973. The dispersal centres of terrestrial vertebrates in the Neotropical realm: A study in the evolution of the Neotropical biota and its native landscapes. Junk, La Haya.spa
dc.relation.references77. Murphy P G & A E Lugo. 1986. Ecology of Tropical Dry Forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 17: 67-88.spa
dc.relation.references78. O’Donnell M.S. & D. A. Ignizio. 2012. Bioclimatic predictors for supporting ecological applications in the conterminous United States: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 691: 10 p.spa
dc.relation.references79. Pax F & K Hoffmann 1936. Capparidaceae. Págs. 146-223 en: A Engler & K A Prantl. Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Ed. 2. Vol. 17b. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.spa
dc.relation.references80. Pennington R T, C E Lehmann & L M Rowland. 2018. Tropical savannas and dry forests. Curr Biol. 28(9): R541-R545. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.014.spa
dc.relation.references81. Pennington R T, M Lavin & A Oliveira-Filho. 2009. Woody Plant Diversity, Evolution, and Ecology in the Tropics: Perspectives from Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 437-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120327spa
dc.relation.references82. Pennington R T, G P Lewis & J A Ratter. 2006. An overview of the plant diversity, biogeography and conservation of neotropical savannas and seasonally dry forests. In: Pennington R T & J A Ratter (eds.) Neotropical savannas and seasonally dry forests plant diversity, biogeography, and conservation. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. Pp. 1-29.spa
dc.relation.references83. Pennington R T, M Lavin, D E Prado, C A Pendry, S Pell & C Butterworth. 2004. Historical climate change and speciation: Neotropical seasonally dry forest plants show patterns of both Tertiary and Quaternary diversification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 359: 515-538spa
dc.relation.references84. Pennington R T, D E Prado & Pendry C A. 2000. Neotropical seasonally dry forests and Quaternary vegetation changes. Journal of Biogeography 27: 261–273spa
dc.relation.references85. Peterson A T, Soberón J & Sánchez‐Cordero V. 1999 Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285: 1265–1267.spa
dc.relation.references86. Peterson A T. 2011. Ecological niche conservatism: a time‐structured review of evidence. Journal of Biogeography 38 (5): 817-827.spa
dc.relation.references87. Peña-Gómez F, P Guerrero, G Bizama, M Duarte & R Bustamante. 2014. Climatic Niche Conservatism and Biogeographical Non-Equilibrium in Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae), an Invasive Plant in the Chilean Mediterranean Region. PLoS ONE 9(8): e105025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105025spa
dc.relation.references88. Petitpierre B et al. 2012. Climatic Niche Shifts Are Rare Among Terrestrial Plant Invaders. 335 (6074): 1344-1348.spa
dc.relation.references89. Phillips S J. 2017. A Brief Tutorial on Maxent. Available from url: http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/. Accessed on 2019-04-03.spa
dc.relation.references90. Phillips S J & M Dubík. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.spa
dc.relation.references91. Phillips S, Anderson R & Schapire R. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190: 231–259spa
dc.relation.references92. Pizano C, M Cabrera & H García 2014. Bosque seco tropical en Colombia; Generalidades y Contexto. 37-47p. In: El bosque seco tropical en Colombia. Pizano C & H García (eds.). 2014. Bogotá, IAvH. 349p.spa
dc.relation.references93. Presl J S 1825. Prirozenosti Rostlin. 2: 275p.spa
dc.relation.references94. Portillo-Quintero C A & G A Sánchez-Azofeifa. 2010. Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biological Conservation 143 (1): 144-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.020spa
dc.relation.references95. Prinzing A, W Durka, S Klotz & R Brandl. 2001. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc Biol Sci. 268 (1483): 2383–2389. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1801spa
dc.relation.references96. Pulliam H R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology letters 3 (4): 249-261.spa
dc.relation.references97. Pyron R A et al. 2014. Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the evolutionary basis of ecological speciation. Biological Reviews 90 (4): 1248-1262.spa
dc.relation.references98. R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.spa
dc.relation.references99. Richardson D M & R J Whittaker. 2010. Conservation biogeography–foundations, concepts and challenges. Diversity Distrib. 16: 313–320.spa
dc.relation.references100. Roberts D R & A Hamann. 2012. Predicting potential climate change impacts with bioclimate envelope models: a palaeoecological perspective. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21: 121–133.spa
dc.relation.references101. Romero Castañeda R 1965. Capparidáceas. in Flora del Centro de Bolívar, R. Romero Castañeda, Bogotá, pp. 59-79spa
dc.relation.references102. Ruiz Zapata T. 2005. Capparis L. (Capparoideae: Capparaceae) en el Estado Trujillo, Venezuela. Ernstia 15(1-4): 27-50.spa
dc.relation.references103. Ruiz Zapata T. 2004. Capparaceae del estado Táchira, Venezuela. Ernstia 14 (1-4): 1-26.spa
dc.relation.references104. Ruiz Zapata T. 2002. Capparaceae del Parque Nacional Henri Pittier, Venezuela. Ernstia 12 (3-4): 137-172.spa
dc.relation.references105. Ruiz Zapata T. 1999. Capparidaceas venezolanas y sus usos. Memorias del Instituto de Biología Experimental vol. 2: 000-000.spa
dc.relation.references106. Ruiz Zapata & H H Iltis. 1998. Capparaceae. In Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana, P. Berry, B. Holst & K. Yatskievych (Eds.), St. Louis, Missouri: Missouri Botanical Garden Press vol. 4: 132-157.Sánchez-Azofeifa G et al. 2005. Research priorities for Neotropical dry forests. Biotropica 37:477–485.spa
dc.relation.references107. Sarmiento G. 1975. The dry plant formations of South America and their floristic connections. Journal of Biogeography 2: 233-251spa
dc.relation.references108. Schoener T. 1968. Schoener TW. The anolis lizards of bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology. 1968; 49:704–726. DOI: 10.2307/1935534.spa
dc.relation.references109. Shannon R C. 1927. Contribución a los estudios de las zonas biológicos de la República Argentina. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 4: 1-14.spa
dc.relation.references110. Silva D, B Vilela, P De Marco Jr & A Nemésio. 2014. Using Ecological Niche Models and Niche Analyses to Understand Speciation Patterns: The Case of Sister Neotropical Orchid Bees. PLoS One 9 (11): e113246. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113246spa
dc.relation.references111. Skeels A & M Cardillo. 2017. Environmental niche conservatism explains the accumulation of species richness in Mediterranean‐hotspot plant genera. Evolution 71 (3): 582-594.spa
dc.relation.references112. Soberón J. 2007. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distribution of species. Ecology letters 10:1115-1123.spa
dc.relation.references113. Soberón J, L Osorio-Olvera & T Peterson. 2017. Diferencias conceptuales entre modelación de nichos y modelación de áreas de distribución. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 88 (2017): 437–441spa
dc.relation.references114. Soberón J & T Peterson. 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2: 1-10.spa
dc.relation.references115. Subcomité de Estándares y Peticiones de la UICN. 2017. Directrices de uso de las Categorías y Criterios de la Lista Roja de la UICN. Version 13. Preparado por el Subcomité de Estándares y Peticiones. Disponible en: https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/redlistguidelinesspa
dc.relation.references116. Syfert M, Smith M & Coomes D. 2013. The Effects of Sampling Bias and Model Complexity on the Predictive Performance of MaxEnt Species Distribution Models. PLoS ONE 8(2): 1-11.spa
dc.relation.references117. Tropicos.org. Cynophalla mattogrossensis. 2019. Missouri Botanical Garden. 06 May 2019 <http://www.tropicos.org/Name/50326957>spa
dc.relation.references118. UICN. 2019. Breve historia de la IUCN. 9 Mayo del 2019. <https://www.iucn.org/es/acerca-de-la-uicn/union/breve-historia-de-la-uicn>spa
dc.relation.references119. Vargas W & Ramírez W. 2014. Lineamientos generales para la restauración ecológica del bosque seco tropical en Colombia. En: Pizano C, García H, editores. El bosque seco tropical en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Pp. 253–291.spa
dc.relation.references120. Warren D & Seifert S. 2011. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications 21(2): 335-342.spa
dc.relation.references121. Warren D, R E Glor & M Turelli. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62 (11): 2868–2883.spa
dc.relation.references122. Wiens J J et al. 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology letters 13: 1310-1324.spa
dc.relation.references123. Wiens J J & Graham C H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 519-539.spa
dc.relation.references124. Whittaker R J, M B Araújo, P Jepson, R J Ladle, J E Watson & K J Willis. 2005. Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions, 11 (1): 3-23.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biología::577 - Ecologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalBosque seco tropicalspa
dc.subject.proposalTropical dry foresteng
dc.subject.proposalModelamiento del nichospa
dc.subject.proposalEcological niche modellingeng
dc.subject.proposalConservatismo del nichospa
dc.subject.proposalNiche conservatismeng
dc.subject.proposalUICNspa
dc.subject.proposalUICNeng
dc.subject.proposalGeographical distribution of animals and plantseng
dc.subject.proposalAnimales y plantas - Distribución geográficaspa
dc.titleBiogeografía de la conservación de Cynophalla (DC.) J.Presl (Capparaceae)spa
dc.title.alternativeConservation biogeography of Cynophalla (DC.) J.Presl (Capparaceae)spa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1140868278.2019.pdf
Tamaño:
5.07 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Bosques y Conservación Ambiental

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: