Metodología para la evaluación de herramientas de software para la e-Participación

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorSánchez Torres, Jenny Marcelaspa
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Bernal, César Alejandrospa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGriego (Grupo Investigación en Gestión y Organizaciones)spa
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T19:57:31Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T19:57:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractEsta tesis de maestría presenta la investigación realizada para la obtención de la Metodología para la Evaluación de Software para la e-Participación – MESeP, diseñada para ser aplicable a cualquier herramienta de software para la e-Participación, siempre y cuando se tenga acceso a la información. Este trabajo surge como respuesta a varias inquietudes, tales como: la falta de rigurosidad en la definición de las etapas de evaluación para las herramientas software para e-participación, la carencia de una identificación precisa de las funcionalidades de los sistemas de información para la participación ciudadana y, la ausencia de metodologías de evaluación de herramientas de software para la participación electrónica, lo que llevó a dos preguntas orientadoras que a su vez se tradujeron en dos revisiones sistemáticas de literatura -RSL. En la primera RSL se identificaron características y factores asociados a las herramientas de software para la e-Participación, y en la segunda, a la identificación de variables e indicadores. A partir de lo anterior, se realizó la asociación de los factores con las variables identificadas y luego de las variables con los indicadores. Se realizó la primera versión de la metodología la cual fue sometida a un juicio de expertos. Luego del juicio de expertos se realizó un proceso de refinamiento, lo que dio como resultado la versión final de la MESeP que cuenta con cuatro fases y ocho actividades, de igual forma se presentan los nueve factores, 23 variables y 64 indicadores identificados. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractThis master thesis presents the research conducted to obtain the Methodology for the Evaluation of e-Participation Software - MESeP, designed to apply to any e-Participation software tool if access to information is available. This research emerges as a response to some lacks identified. On the one hand, there is a lack of rigorousness in the definition of evaluation stages for e-participation software tools. Another is a lack of precise identification of information systems functionalities for citizen participation. On the other hand, there are no methodologies for evaluating e-participation software tools, leading to two guiding questions translated into two systematic literature reviews SLR. The first SLR identified characteristics and factors associated with e-Participation software tools. The second one identified variables and indicators. Then, the factors were associated with the determined variables and the indicators. An expert judgment analyzed the first version of the methodology. After the expert judgment, a refinement process was carried out, resulting in the final version of the MESeP, which has four phases and eight activities and the nine factors, 23 variables, and 64 indicators identified.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computaciónspa
dc.description.notesIncluye anexosspa
dc.description.researchareaSistemas y organizacionesspa
dc.format.extentxvii, 186 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80879
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrialspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríaspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computaciónspa
dc.relation.references(AECID)., F. E.-P. y de la A. E. para la C. I. y el D. (2014). Ciudadanía Política Voz Y Participación Ciudadana En América Latina (Issue Ciudadanía política: Voz y participación ciudadana en América).spa
dc.relation.referencesAbu-Shanab, E. A. (2017). E-government familiarity influence on Jordanians’ perceptions. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 103–113.spa
dc.relation.referencesAham-Anyanwu, N., & Honglei, L. (2017). E-PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: FORMULATING A CITIZENCONTENT ENGAGEMENT MODEL. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2017, 753–770.spa
dc.relation.referencesAichholzer, G., & Strauß, S. (2016). Electronic participation in Europe. In Electronic Democracy in Europe: Prospects and Challenges of E-Publics, E-Participation and E-Voting.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Sai, Z. A., & Abualigah, L. M. (2017). Big data and E-government: A review. ICIT 2017 - 8th International Conference on Information Technology, Proceedings, 580–587.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl Athmay, A. A. A. R. A. (2015). Demographic factors as determinants of e-governance adoption: A field study in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(2), 159–180.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl Nagi, E., & Hamdan, M. (2009). Computerization and e-Government implementation in Jordan: Challenges, obstacles and successes. Government Information Quarterly, 26(4), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.04.003spa
dc.relation.referencesAlarcón Aldana, A., González Sanabria, J., & Rodríguez Torres, S. (2011). Guía para pymes desarrolladoras de software, basada en la norma ISO/IEC 15504. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica Del Norte, 1(34), 285-313–313.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlharbi, A. (2016). An Investigation of the Impact Factors to Increase Citizens’ Engagement in E-participation on E-government in Saudi Arabia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlharbi, A., & Kang, K. (2014a). E-participation service in Saudi Arabian e-Government websites: The influencing factors from citizens’ perspective. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2014-Janua, 265–272.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlharbi, A., & Kang, K. (2014b). E-participation service in Saudi Arabian e-Government websites: The influencing factors from citizens’ perspective. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2014-Janua, 265–272.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlharbi, A., & Kang, K. (2015). Key aspects of citizen engagement in E-participation on E-government websites. Proceedings of the 26th International Business Information Management Association Conference - Innovation Management and Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage: From Regional Development to Global Growth, IBIMA 2015, 1684–1692.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlharbi, A., Kang, K., & Hawryszkiewycz, I. (2015). The influence of trust and subjective norms on citizens’ intentions to engage in E-participation on E-government websites. ACIS 2015 Proceedings - 26th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlharbi, A., Kang, K., & Sohaib, O. (2016). Citizens engagement in e-participation on egovernemnt websites through SWAT model: A case of Saudi Arabia. PACIS 2016 Proceedings, May, 2019. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011116104&partnerID=40&md5=a883334371af1c7e84da7d609d282ee5spa
dc.relation.referencesAli, H., Macaulay, L., & Zhao, L. (2009). A collaboration pattern language for e-participation: A strategy for reuse. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 29–38.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlmuwil, A., Weerakkody, V., & El-Haddadeh, R. (2011). A conceptual study of the factors influencing e-inclusion. Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems - Informing Responsible Management: Sustainability in Emerging Economies, EMCIS 2011, 2011(2008), 198–209.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlshehri, M., Drew, S., Alhussain, T., & Alghamdi, R. (2012). The effects of website quality on adoption of E-Government service: An empirical study applying UTAUT model using SEM. ACIS 2012 : Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, November.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmaya-Rodríguez, J. E., Gonzalez-Sanabria, J. S., & Castro-Romero, A. (2017). Urna de cristal como canal digital de participación ciudadana en Colombia -Glass urn as digital channel for citizen participation in Colombia. Revista Científica, 4(27), 407. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.RC.2016.27.a10spa
dc.relation.referencesAPEP. (2015). La privacidad en el desarrollo de software: obligación y oportunidad. | LOPD y Seguridad.spa
dc.relation.referencesAraújo, R. P. A., Penteado, C. L. C., & dos Santos, M. B. P. (2015). Digital democracy and experiences in e-participation: Internet activism and public policy | Democracia digital e experiências de e-participação: Webativismo e políticas públicas. Historia, Ciencias, Saude - Manguinhos, 22, 1597–1619. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702015000500004spa
dc.relation.referencesAs-Saber, S. N., Srivastava, A., & Hossain, K. (2006). Information Technology Law and E-government : A Developing Country Perspective. 1(1), 84–101.spa
dc.relation.referencesÅström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., & Pirannejad, A. (2012). Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 142–150.spa
dc.relation.referencesBagui, L., & Bytheway, A. (2012). Listening to the ground: Key indicators of e-participation in government for Africa. In Handbook of Research on E-Government in Emerging Economies: Adoption, E-Participation, and Legal Frameworks.spa
dc.relation.referencesBanjac, M. (2017). Slovenian e-government: A citizencentred perspective. Journal of Comparative Politics, 10(2), 37–54.spa
dc.relation.referencesBannister, F. (2005). E-government and administrative power: the one-stop-shop meets the turf war. Electronic Government, 2(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2005.007092spa
dc.relation.referencesBarcellini, F., Détienne, F., & Burkhardt, J.-M. (2009). Participation in online interaction spaces: Design-use mediation in an Open Source Software community. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(3), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.013spa
dc.relation.referencesBataineh, L., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2016). How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0058spa
dc.relation.referencesBehl, A., Sheorey, P., Nayak, S., & Kumar, V. V. A. (2017). Role of information and communications technology (ICT) in participatory democracy: A forerunner to an egalitarian society. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047375spa
dc.relation.referencesBenyoucef, M., & Verrons, M.-H. (2008). Configurable e-negotiation systems for large scale and transparent decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9073-yspa
dc.relation.referencesBertot, J. C., McDermott, P., & Smith, T. (2012). Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2491–2499. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.658spa
dc.relation.referencesBID. (2016). ¿Por qué el gobierno abierto es importante para las ciudades?spa
dc.relation.referencesBojovic, D., Bonzanigo, L., & Giupponi, C. (2012). Drivers of change in southern European agriculture: Online participatory approaches for the analysis of planned and autonomous adaptation strategies. IEMSs 2012 - Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, 684–691.spa
dc.relation.referencesBojovic, D., Bonzanigo, L., Giupponi, C., & Maziotis, A. (2015). Online participation in climate change adaptation: A case study of agricultural adaptation measures in Northern Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 8–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesBojovic, D., Giupponi, C., Klug, H., Morper-Busch, L., Cojocaru, G., & Schörghofer, R. (2018). An online platform supporting the analysis of water adaptation measures in the Alps. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(2), 214–229.spa
dc.relation.referencesBolgov, R., & Karachay, V. (2016). E-participation projects development in the e-governance institutional structure of the eUrasian Economic Union’s countries: Comparative overview. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 674). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_20spa
dc.relation.referencesBonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015). Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ facebook sites. an empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in western europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBouchard, G., Clinchant, S., & Convertino, G. (2014). E-participation with stakeholders’ feedback platforms. In Handbook of Research on Advanced ICT Integration for Governance and Policy Modeling. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6236-0.ch010spa
dc.relation.referencesBoudjelida, A., & Mellouli, S. (2018). A practical framework for electronic citizens participation using a multidimensional analysis approach. 14(3), 287–311.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoudjelida, A., & Mellouli, S. (2016). A multidimensional analysis approach for electronic citizens participation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 08-10-June, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912195spa
dc.relation.referencesBoudjelida, A., Mellouli, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Electronic citizens participation: Systematic review. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01-03-Marc, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910019.2910097spa
dc.relation.referencesBraccini, A. M., Federici, T., & Sæbø, Ø. (2017). Tensions in online communities: The case of a mass size eparticipation initiative. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10429 LNCS, 149–160.spa
dc.relation.referencesBraccini, A. M., Za, S., & Sæbø, Ø. (2018). A collaborative discourse or only a collection of voices? An exploratory study of the use of social media in the e-participation domain. 26th European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization - Facets of Socio-Technical Change, ECIS 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurkhardt, D., Nazemi, K., & Ginters, E. (2015). Best-Practice Piloting Based on an Integrated Social Media Analysis and Visualization for E-Participation Simulation in Cities. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 66–74.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurkhardt, D., Nazemi, K., Klamm, C., Kohlhammer, J., & Kuijper, A. (2014). Comparison of E-Participation roadmap in industrial and developing countries based on Germany and Kenya. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2014-Janua, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691209spa
dc.relation.referencesCai, G., Sun, F., & Kropczynski, J. (2017). Crystallizing local political knowledge for informed public participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10429 LNCS, 53–64.spa
dc.relation.referencesCalderón, C., & Lorenzo, S. (2010). Open Government. http://libros.metabiblioteca.org:8080/bitstream/001/163/8/978-84-937218-5-5.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCallejas-Cuervo, M., Alarcón-Aldana, A. C., & Álvarez-Carreño, A. M. (2017). Modelos de calidad del software, un estado del arte. ENTRAMADO, 13(1), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2017v13n1.25125spa
dc.relation.referencesCallinan, C., Scott, M., Whelan, E., & Ojo, A. (2017). A co-creation based model for engaging citizen open data use. 30th Bled EConference: Digital Transformation - From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives, BLED 2017, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-043-1.5spa
dc.relation.referencesCaric, A., Vukovic, M., & Jevtic, D. (2015). E-Consultation: Automatic system for online consultations. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231215spa
dc.relation.referencesCastells, M., Martinez Gimeno, C., & Alborés, J. (2000). LA SOCIEDAD RED (S. A. Alianza Editorial (Ed.); Segunda Ed). United States byBlackwell Publishers Inc. http://www.felsemiotica.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LA_SOCIEDAD_RED-Castells-copia.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCecez-Kecmanovic, D., Kennan, M. A., & Hull, D. (2010). Youth online participation in government decision making. Proc. of the IADIS Int. Conf. e-Commerce 2010, Proc. of the IADIS Int. Conf. e-Democracy, Equity and Social Justice 2010, Part of the MCCSIS 2010, 11–20.spa
dc.relation.referencesCEPAL. (2012). Plan de Gobierno abierto: Una hoja de ruta para los gobiernos de la región.spa
dc.relation.referencesChaieb, C., Achour, H., & Ferchichi, A. (2018). E-government and social media in tunisia: An empirical analysis. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 325). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97749-2_14spa
dc.relation.referencesCharalabidis, Y, & Loukis, E. (2011). Transforming government agencies’ approach to eparticipation through efficient exploitation of social media. 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharalabidis, Y, & Loukis, E. (2012). Participative public policy making through multiple social media platforms utilization. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8(3), 78–97.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharalabidis, Y, & Loukis, E. (2015). Transforming government agencies’ approach to eParticipation through multiple social media exploitation. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 5, 251–268.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharalabidis, Y, Loukis, E. N., Androutsopoulou, A., Karkaletsis, V., & Triantafillou, A. (2014). Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2013-0035spa
dc.relation.referencesCharalabidis, Yannis, & Koussouris, S. (2012). Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making.spa
dc.relation.referencesChu, P.-Y., Tseng, H.-L., Lee, C.-P., Huang, W.-L., Huang, T.-Y., & Hung, Y.-T. (2017). A Longitudinal research of public value and electronic governance development in Taiwan. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047387spa
dc.relation.referencesChun, S. A., & Cho, J. S. (2012). E-participation and transparent policy decision making. Information Polity, 17(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0273spa
dc.relation.referencesCMMI Product Team. (2006). CMMI for Development , Version 1 . 2. Framework, August, 573.spa
dc.relation.referencesComisión Europea. (1998). La Información del Sector público: un recurso Clave para Europa. Libro verde sobre la información del sector público. COM (1998). http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/green_paper/gp_es.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCommission of the European Communities. (2002). eEurope 2005 : Una sociedad de la información para todos. 2002, 21–22.spa
dc.relation.referencesCommission of the European Communities. (2003). The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future.spa
dc.relation.referencesCouncill, B., & Heineman, G. T. (2007). Definition of a Software Component and Its Elements. Open Distributed Systems, 5–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2001). Educational Research - Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Pearson (Ed.); 4th edition).spa
dc.relation.referencesDalcher, D. (2014). Software project management in a changing world. In Software Project Management in a Changing World (Vol. 9783642550). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55035-5_7spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2016). Why Choose Open Government? Motivations for the Adoption of Open Government Policies in Four European Countries. Policy and Internet, 8(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.118spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Cindio, F., De Marco, A., & Grew, P. (2007). Deliberative community networks for local governance. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 7(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2007.014532spa
dc.relation.referencese Jong, M. D. T., Neulen, S., & Jansma, S. R. (2019). Citizens’ intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives: Comparing three co-creation configurations. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 490–500spa
dc.relation.referencesDeloitte, Research, D., Touche, D. &, & Consulting, D. (2000). At the Dawn of E-Government: The Citizen as Customer. Deloitte Consulting.spa
dc.relation.referencesDIamantopoulou, V., Androutsopoulou, A., Gritzalis, S., & Charalabidis, Y. (2018). An assessment of privacy preservation in crowdsourcing approaches: Towards GDPR compliance. Proceedings - International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 2018-May, 1–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz Nafría, J. M., Alfonso Cendón, J., & Panizo Alonso, L. (2015). Building up eParticipatory decision-making from the local to the global scale. Study case at the European Higher Education Area. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.004spa
dc.relation.referencesDiaz Narvaez, Vi., & Calzadilla Nuñez, A. (2015). Artículos científicos, tipos de investigación y productividad científica en las Ciencias de la Salud. https://doi.org/10.12804/revsalud14.01.2016.10spa
dc.relation.referencesDini, A. A. (2017). The dark side of social media in eparticipation: A socio-legal perspective. AMCIS 2017 - America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, 2017-Augus.spa
dc.relation.referencesDini, A. A., & Sæbø, O. (2016). The current state of social media research for eParticipation in developing countries: A literature review. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016-March, 2698–2707.spa
dc.relation.referencesDini, A. A., Wahid, F., & Sæbo, Ø. (2016). Affordances and constraints of social media use in eparticipation: Perspectives from Indonesian politicians. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016 - Proceedings.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdelmann, N., Krimmer, R., & Parycek, P. (2017). How online lurking contributes value to E-participation: A conceptual approach to evaluating the role of lurkers in e-participation. 2017 4th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, 86–93.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdelmann, N., Parycek, P., & Schossbölck, J. (2011). The unibrennt movement: A successful case of mobilising lurkers in a public sphere. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(1–2), 43–68.spa
dc.relation.referencesElseiver. (2018). Elseiver.spa
dc.relation.referencesErgazakis, K., Askounis, D., Kokkinakos, P., & Tsitsanis, A. (2012). An Integrated Methodology for the Evaluation of ePetitions. In Yannis Charalabidis & S. Koussouris (Eds.), Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making (pp. 39–59). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_3spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de Contenido y Juicio de Expertos: Una Aproximacón a su Utilización. Avances En Medición. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(78)90049-6spa
dc.relation.referencesFalco, E. (2016). The use of open source softwares in the process of planning participation | L’uso di software open source nel processo di pianificazione partecipata. Territorio, 78, 159–165.spa
dc.relation.referencesFath-allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014). E-Government Maturity Models: A Comparative Study. March. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2014.5306spa
dc.relation.referencesFederici, T., Braccini, A. M., & Sæbø, Ø. (2015). “Gentlemen, all aboard!” ICT and party politics: Reflections from a Mass-eParticipation experience. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.009spa
dc.relation.referencesFedotova, O., Teixeira, L., & Alvelos, H. (2012). E-participation in Portugal: evaluation of government electronic platforms. Procedia Technology, 5, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.017spa
dc.relation.referencesFuchs, C., Bernhaupt, R., Hartwig, C., Kramer, M. A., & Maier-Rabler, U. (2006). Broadening eParticipation: Rethinking ICTs and Participation. Association of Internet Researchers(AoIR), 2, 38.spa
dc.relation.referencesFugini, M., Maggiolini, P., & Valles, R. S. (2013). e-Government typologies, stakeholder relationships and information systems support: The case of services to employment. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 187–195.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalbraith, B., Cleland, B., Martin, S., Wallace, J., Mulvenna, M., & McAdam, R. (2013). Engaging user communities with eParticipation technology: Findings from a European project. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(3), 281–294.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, E. C. (2013). Fostering e-participation in Colombia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591916spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline? Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431spa
dc.relation.referencesGil-García, J. R., Criado, J. I., & Carlos Téllez, J. (2017). Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en la Administración Pública: Conceptos, Enfoques, Aplicaciones y Resultados. www.infotec.mxspa
dc.relation.referencesGobierno Vasco. (2017). Irekia Eusko Jaurlaritza - Gobierno Vasco. https://www.irekia.euskadi.eusspa
dc.relation.referencesGoldkuhl, G., & Röstlinger, A. (2015). Inter-organisational e-government: From four levels of interoperability to seven dimensions of co-governance. The 12th Scandinavian Workshop on E-Government, 1–15. http://www.vits.org/publikationer/dokument/802.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Zabala, M. P.; Galvis Lista, E. A.;Sánchez Torres, J. M. (2015). Identificación de factores que afectan el desarrollo de la inclusión digital * Identifying Factors that Affect the Development of Digital Inclusion Identification des facteurs qui affectent le développement de l ’ inclusion numérique. 175–191.spa
dc.relation.referencesonzález-Zabala; Galvis Lista;Sánchez Torres, J. (2015). Identificación de factores que afectan el desarrollo de la inclusión digital. 175–191.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Feeney, M. K. (2017). Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12689spa
dc.relation.referencesGuillamón, M.-D., Ríos, A.-M., Gesuele, B., & Metallo, C. (2016). Factors influencing social media use in local governments: The case of Italy and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.005spa
dc.relation.referencesHa, H., & Jose, J. (2017). Public participation and environmental governance in Singapore. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 4(3), 186–204.spa
dc.relation.referencesHansson, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2014). Deliberation and representation in participatory tools for the public sector. ECIS 2014 Proceedings - 22nd European Conference on Information Systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesHansson, K., Ludwig, T., & Aitamurto, T. (2019). Capitalizing Relationships: Modes of Participation in Crowdsourcing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 28(5), 977–1000.spa
dc.relation.referencesHansson, K., Muller, M., Aitamurto, T., Light, A., Mazarakis, A., Gupta, N., & Ludwig, T. (2016). Toward a typology of participation in crowdwork. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 26-Februar, 515–521.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarahap, N., & Budi, I. (2016). The use of twitter for government agencies in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conferences on ICT, Society, and Human Beings 2016, Web Based Communities and Social Media 2016, Big Data Analytics, Data Mining and Computational Intelligence 2016 and Theory and Practice in Modern Computing 2016 - Part O, 73–80.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeumader, P., Edler, C., Miesenberger, K., & Wolkerstorfer, S. (2018). Requirements engineering for people with cognitive disabilities – Exploring new ways for peer-researchers and developers to cooperate. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10896 LNCS, 439–445.spa
dc.relation.referencesHung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yu, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005spa
dc.relation.referencesIBM. (2019). What is software development? | IBM.spa
dc.relation.referencesIslam, M. (2008). Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model. European Journal of EPractice, 5(10).spa
dc.relation.referencesISO/IEC. (2018). ISO - ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001 - Software engineering — Product quality — Part 1: Quality model.spa
dc.relation.referencesISO. (2019). ISO - International Organization for Standardizationspa
dc.relation.referencesJamal, M. Al, & Shanab, E. A. (2016). The influence of open government on e-government website: the case of Jordan. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 8(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2016.078131spa
dc.relation.referencesJanssen, M., Wimmer, M. A., & Deljoo, A. (2015). Policy practice and digital science: Integrating complex systems, social simulation and public administration in policy research. In Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2spa
dc.relation.referencesJohann, T., & Maalej, W. (2015). Democratic mass participation of users in Requirements Engineering? 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2015.7320433spa
dc.relation.referencesJohannessen, M. R., & Følstad, A. (2014). Political social media sites as public sphere: A case study of the norwegian labour party. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 1067–1096.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohannessen, M. R., & Munkvold, B. E. (2012). Defining the social media IT artefact for eparticipation: An ensemble view. ECIS 2012 - Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesJung, K. (2018). Mapping community diversity and e-participation in emergency management: Evidence from WebEOC in the city of San Francisco. International Journal of Emergency Management, 14(3), 275–290.spa
dc.relation.referencesJung, K., Park, S. J., Wu, W.-N., & Park, H. W. (2014). A webometric approach to policy analysis and management using exponential random graph models. Quality and Quantity, 49(2), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0010-2spa
dc.relation.referencesKapoor, K. K., Omar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2017). Enabling multichannel participation through ICT adaptation. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 13(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2017040104spa
dc.relation.referencesKarkin, N. (2014). Barriers for Sustainable e-Participation Process: The Case of Turkey. Public Administration and Information Technology, 3, 227–243.spa
dc.relation.referencesKassen, M. (2018). Open data and its intermediaries: a cross-country perspective on participatory movement among independent developers. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 16(3), 327–342.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhasawneh, R.T., Abu Shamaa, R. A., & Rabayah, W. A. (2014). E-participation: A way for creating public value. In Human Rights and the Impact of ICT in the Public Sphere: Participation, Democracy, and Political Autonomy. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6248-3.ch002spa
dc.relation.referencesKhasawneh, Rawan T, & Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2013). E-Government and Social Media Sites: The Role and Impact. World Journal of Computer Application and Technology, 1(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.13189/wjcat.2013.010103spa
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009spa
dc.relation.referencesKoussouris, S., Charalabidis, Y., & Askounis, D. (2011). A review of the European Union eParticipation action pilot projects. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(1), 8–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, J. (2013). E-participation and E-government maturity: A global perspective. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 402). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_26spa
dc.relation.referencesKrishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, V. K. G. (2012). Contextual factors, e-participation, and E-Government development: Testing a multiple-mediation model. Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaosuwan, T., & Ritjareonwattu, S. (2012). An innovative approach to the development of spatial data infrastructures and Web 2.0 technologies. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 8(2), 53–61.spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, J., & Kim, S. (2014). Active citizen e-participation in local governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter? Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2044–2053.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeitner, M., & Bonitz, A. (2016). Authentication in the context of e-participation: Current practice, challenges and recommendations. Proceedings - 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2016, 480–485.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, S., Hietajärvi, L., Palonen, T., Salmela-Aro, K., & Hakkarainen, K. (2017). Adolescents’ Social Networks: Exploring Different Patterns of Socio-Digital Participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 255–274.spa
dc.relation.referencesLin, Y. (2018). A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecommunications Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.003spa
dc.relation.referencesLoukis, E, Charalabidis, Y., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2012). Different digital moderated and nonmoderated mechanisms for public participation. Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, EMCIS 2012, 63–73.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoukis, Euripidis. (2014). Evaluating eparticipation projects and lessons learnt. In Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making (Vol. 9783642272, pp. 95–115). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_6spa
dc.relation.referencesLourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006spa
dc.relation.referencesLuciano, E. M., Wiedenhöft, G. C., & Dos Santos, F. P. (2018). Promoting social participation through Digital Governance: Identifying barriers in the Brazilian public administration. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209376spa
dc.relation.referencesLuján-Mora, S., Navarrete, R., & Peñafiel, M. (2014). Egovernment and web accessibility in South America. 2014 1st International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2014, 77–82.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaciel, C., Roque, L., & Garcia, A. C. B. (2018). Maturity in decision-making: A method to measure e-participation systems in virtual communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 14(4), 395–416.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 37(C), 1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265300spa
dc.relation.referencesMacintosh, A. (2006). Evaluating How Eparticipation Changes. Communication, 06(Macintosh 2004), 1–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacintosh, A., Coleman, S., & Schneeberger, A. (2009). eParticipation: The research gaps. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5694 LNCS, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_1spa
dc.relation.referencesMacintosh, A., Gordon, T. F., & Renton, A. (2009). Providing argument support for E-participation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(1), 43–59.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16–30.spa
dc.relation.referencesMahou-Lago, X. M., & Varela-Álvarez, E. J. (2016). Innovation and Opportunities for Citizen Participation in Spanish Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology, 11, 367–392.spa
dc.relation.referencesManolopoulos, C., Nakou, P., Panagiotaki, A., Sofotassios, D., Stamatiou, Y., & Spirakis, P. (2008). A step-wise refinement approach for enhancing e-Voting acceptance. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 351, 275–280.spa
dc.relation.referencesManolopoulos, C., Sofotassios, D., Spirakis, P., & Stamatiou, Y. C. (2013). A framework for protecting voters’ privacy in electronic voting procedures. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 15(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2013040101spa
dc.relation.referencesMawela, T., & Ochara, N. M. (2013). Sustainability of E-participation through mobile technologies. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513456.2513475spa
dc.relation.referencesMedaglia, R. (2012). EParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011). In Government Information Quarterly (Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 346–360). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862533883&doi=10.1016%2Fj.giq.2012.02.010&partnerID=40&md5=ddd876b3bee04bb1f3cbca875074ea0cspa
dc.relation.referencesMedaglia, Ronny, & Andersen, K. N. (2009). The Use of Facebook in National Election Campaigns: Politics as Usual? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5694, X, 187 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8spa
dc.relation.referencesMehdi, M., Stasiewicz, A., Porwol, L., Lee, D., & Ojo, A. (2014). Synthesizing a criterion for SOA reference architecture to sustain eParticipation. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 441). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11710-2_4spa
dc.relation.referencesMendeley. (2019). Mendeley.spa
dc.relation.referencesMenger, F., Morris, J., & Salis, C. (2016). Aphasia in an Internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology, 30(2–3), 112–132.spa
dc.relation.referencesMerhi, M. I., & Koong, K. S. (2013). E-government effectiveness: Assessment of contributing governments’ ICT usage factors. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBSR.2013.050615spa
dc.relation.referencesMetz, I., Blöchlinger, A., & Varveris, A. (2010). A prototype system for electronic data interchange among registrar’s offices of different states. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 26 LNICST, 270–278.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Secretaría General de la Presidencia - Chile. (2019). Guía Digital Chile.spa
dc.relation.referencesMINTIC. (2016). Guía para la Implementación de Seguridad de la Información en.spa
dc.relation.referencesMobini, P., & Hansson, H. (2015). E-participation in higher education: The importance of non-technical factors as identified in the EU-project MyUniversity. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015-Febru(February). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7043998spa
dc.relation.referencesMolina Montes, W. A. (2016). Medición de la inclusión digital a través de los servicios de gobierno electrónico en la población rural de Colombia. Caso: municipio de Valledupar.spa
dc.relation.referencesMora Agudo, leonor; Delgado, María; Rivero, J. (2017). A Proposal of Assessment for Local Government E-Participation. Reforma y Democracia, 2017-Febru(67), 69–94.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreno Giraldo, C., & Ruiz Zambrano, D. (2016). Modelo de aplicación de la NTC-iSO/IEC 90003 al desarrollo de software de los sistemas de información geográfica. 4–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesMurdaca, A. M., Cuzzocrea, F., Oliva, P., & Larcan, R. (2014). Pedagogical-didactic training for an inclusive didactics: The precision teaching for strengthening of basic and integrating skills in intellectual disabilities. In Educational Technology Use and Design for Improved Learning Opportunities.spa
dc.relation.referencesMurray, T., Stephens, L., Woolf, B. P., Wing, L., Xu, X., & Shrikant, N. (2013). Supporting social deliberative skills online: The effects of reflective scaffolding tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8029 LNCS, 313–322.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation: Drawing upon UTAUT and citizen empowerment. Information Technology and People, 32(2), 364–386.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Casteleyn, S., & Irani, Z. (2019). Continuous usage of e-participation: The role of the sense of virtual community. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 536–545.spa
dc.relation.referencesNasir, M. H. N., & Sahibuddin, S. (2011). Critical success factors for software projects: A comparative study. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(10), 2174–2186.spa
dc.relation.referencesNtaliani, M., Costopoulou, C., & Karetsos, S. (2017). Investigating the mobile side of e-participation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 9(3–4), 210–228.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00056spa
dc.relation.referencesOchara, N. M., Mawela, T., & Odhiambo, J. N. (2016). Citizen resistance to e-government adoption. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2016-Janua, 122–132.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2011). OECD Guide to Measuring the Information Society. In OECD Guide to Measuring the Information Society 2011. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264113541-enspa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2016). Recommendation of the Council on Water. OECD Legal Instruments, 17.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD iLibrary. (2011). Choice Reviews Online, 48(07), 48-3639-48–3639. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-3639spa
dc.relation.referencesOlszowski, R. (2016). E-government 2.0: Web 2.0 in public administration. interdisciplinary postgraduate studies program. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 9934 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_6spa
dc.relation.referencesPaganelli, F., & Pecchi, F. (2013). Towards a reference model and a web-based framework for eParticipation services design. Information Resources Management Journal, 26(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2013040101spa
dc.relation.referencesPanopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2014). Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives. Information and Organization, 24(4), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.08.001spa
dc.relation.referencesParycek, P., Sachs, M., Sedy, F., & Schossböck, J. (2014). Evaluation of an E-participation project: Lessons learned and success factors from a cross-cultural perspective. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8654).spa
dc.relation.referencesParycek, P., Sachs, M., Virkar, S., & Krimmer, R. (2017). Voting in E-participation: A set of requirements to support accountability and trust by electoral committees. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10615 LNCS, 42–56.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerez Espes, C., Wimmer, M. A., & Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. (2014). A framework for evaluating the impact of e-participation experiences. Innovation and the Public Sector, 21, 20–29.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerez Perez, L. A. (2016). Metodolog�a para establecer la percepci�n de beneficios o de desventajas acad�micas del uso de redes sociales en educaci�n secundaria. 126. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/56042/spa
dc.relation.referencesPina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2017). Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: Findings from Austria, Germany and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.009spa
dc.relation.referencesPMI. (2019). Project Management Institute | PMI.spa
dc.relation.referencesPoorazizi, M. E., Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. S. (2015). A service-oriented architecture to enable participatory planning: an e-planning platform. July. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1008492spa
dc.relation.referencesPop, D., Moumtzi, V., & Farinos, J. (2014). The good, the bad and the beauty of advertisement for public sector services. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2014-Janua, 210–218.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorwol, L., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2013). Harnessing the duality of e-participation-social software infrastructure design. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591941spa
dc.relation.referencesPorwol, L, Hassan, I., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2015). Harnessing spontaneous participation on social media - Implementing the knowledge extraction component. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 27-30-May-, 333–334.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorwol, L, & Ojo, A. (2017). Barriers and desired affordances of social media based e-Participation - Politicians’ perspectives. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 78–86.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorwol, L, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2014a). A semantic deliberation model for e-Participation. Innovation and the Public Sector, 21, 40–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorwol, L, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2014b). A semantic model for e-participation - Detailed conceptualization and ontology. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 263–272.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorwol, L, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. G. (2016). An ontology for next generation e-Participation initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 583–594.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorwol, Lukasz, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. G. (2018). Social Software Infrastructure for e-Participation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S88–S98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesPressman, R. (2010). Ingeniería del software - Un enfoque práctico.spa
dc.relation.referencesProceedings - 2016 International Conference on Software Security and Assurance, ICSSA 2016. (2017). Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Software Security and Assurance, ICSSA 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesProsser, A. (2012). eParticipation - Did we deliver what we promised? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7452 LNCS, 10–18.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, D. (2018). Problem Areas in e-Participation (p. 10).spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, D. (2019). Metodología para la evaluación de las iniciativas gubernamentales de participación electrónica.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaya Al-Dalou’; Abu-shanab, E. (2013). E-Participation levels and Technologies. The 6th International Conference on Information Technology, May 2013, 1–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesRed de transaparencia y Acceso de la Información. (2014). Directrices – Participación pública y colaboración :spa
dc.relation.referencesRibeiro, M. M., Cunha, M. A., & Barbosa, A. F. (2018). E-participation, social media and digital gap: Challenges in the Brazilian context. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209373spa
dc.relation.referencesRose, J., & Sanford, C. (2016). Designing the e-Participation Artifact. March.spa
dc.relation.referencesSæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007spa
dc.relation.referencesSaldaña, L., & García, J. M. (2013). Diseño, Creación Y Validación De Una Entrevista Para Obtener Datos Biográficos, De Carácter Deportivo- Militar, De Los Militares Que Participaron En Unos Juegos Olímpicos. Journal of Sport and Health Research J Sport Health Res ISSN Journal of Sport and Health Research. Journal of Sport and Health Research J Sport Health Res, 5(52), 157–166spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Franco, M. J., Martín-Velicia, F. A., & Sanz-Altamira, B. (2011). Post-adoption behaviour, community satisfaction and PCS: An analysis of interaction effects in the tuenti community. WEBIST 2011 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 459–465.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Nielsen, E., Lee, D., Panopoulou, E., Delakorda, S., & Takács, G. (2014). Engaging citizens in policy issues: Multidimensional approach, evidence and lessons learned. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8654).spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Torres. (2006). Propuesta metodologica para evaluar las politicas publicas de promocion del e-government como campo de aplicacion de la Sociedad de la Informacion .Conceptualizacion y aplicacion empirica en el caso colombiano. 537.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Torres. (2019). Dinámica de generación de conocimiento.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Torres, J. M., & Miles, I. (2017). The role of future-oriented technology analysis in e-Government: a systematic review. European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0131-7spa
dc.relation.referencesSanford, C., & Rose, J. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.08.002spa
dc.relation.referencesSantamaría-Philco, A., Cerdá, J. C., Penadés, M. C., Quiroz, P., & Mendoza, D. M. (2016). A trust view for a method to eParticipation life cycle. 2016 3rd International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2016, 118–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2016.7461707spa
dc.relation.referencesSantamaría-Philco, A., & Wimmer, M. A. (2018). Trust in e-participation: An empirical research on the influencing factors. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209286spa
dc.relation.referencesSantamaría, A., Canós, J. H., & Penadés, M. C. (2014). Un método de soporte a los procesos de participación pública en procesos de decisión. Noveno Congreso de Ciencia y Tecnología, ESPE, 1390–4663, 231–237.spa
dc.relation.referencesSantini, R. M., & Carvalho, H. (2019). The rise of participatory despotism: a systematic review of online platforms for political engagement. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaraguro-Bravo, R., Puente-Castro, S., Quimba-Herrera, S., Costa-Campuzano, J., & Desiderio-Sanchez, K. (2017). Digital Literacy proposal to improve eParticipation in urban marginal areas. 2017 4th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2017.7962548spa
dc.relation.referencesScarano, V., Malandrino, D., Baker, M., Détienne, F., Andriessen, J., Pardijs, M., Ojo, A., Hogan, M., Meijer, A., & Ruijer, E. (2017). Fostering citizens’ participation and transparency with social tools and personalization. Public Administration and Information Technology, 32, 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63743-3_8spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, S., Liotas, N., Wimmer, M. A., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2010). Interoperability requirements, recommendations and standards in e-participation. In Interoperability in Digital Public Services and Administration: Bridging E-Government and E-Business.spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, S., Neuroth, C., Schefbeck, G., & Wimmer, M. A. (2009). Enabling eparticipation of the youth in the public debate on legislation in austria: A critical reflection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5694 LNCS, 151–162.spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, S., & Wimmer, M. A. (2016). A metamodel for the E-participation reference framework. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9821 LNCS, 3–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, S., & Wimmer, M. A. (2014). Trust in e-participation: Literature review and emerging research needs. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2014-Janua, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691237spa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, S., Wimmer, M. A., & Ventzke, S. (2010). Hands-on guideline for E-participation initiatives. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 334, 49–61.spa
dc.relation.referencesSerov, I., & Leitner, M. (2017). An experimental approach to reputation in E-Participation. Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Software Security and Assurance, ICSSA 2016, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSA.2016.14spa
dc.relation.referencesSieber, R. E., Robinson, P. J., Johnson, P. A., & Corbett, J. M. (2016). Doing Public Participation on the Geospatial Web. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(5), 1030–1046.spa
dc.relation.referencesSlaviero, C., Maciel, C., Alencar, F. B., Santana, E. C., & Souza, P. C. (2010). Designing a platform to facilitate the development of virtual e-participation environments. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 385–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/1930321.1930408spa
dc.relation.referencesSneiders, E., Byungura, J. C., Henkel, M., & Perjons, E. (2017). Potential of language technology to support public organizations and their communication channels in a developing country. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047333spa
dc.relation.referencesSnoeck, M., Crompvoets, J., Habra, N., Simonofski, A., & Vanderose, B. (2017). Reexamining e-participation: systematic literature review on citizen participation in e-government service delivery. AMCIS 2017 - America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, 2017-Augus.spa
dc.relation.referencesSousa, A. A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L. B., & Abrantes, S. (2018). Liberopinion - a web platform for public participation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 199–208.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpiliotopoulou, L., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E. N., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2014). A framework for advanced social media exploitation in government for crowdsourcing. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2014-0002spa
dc.relation.referencesStieglitz, S., Brockmann, T., & Xuan, L. D. (2012). Usage of social media for political communication. Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesStortone, S., & De Cindio, F. (2014). BiPart" of participatory budgeting. A software platform for new political practices. In Innovation and the Public Sector (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-429-9-30spa
dc.relation.referencesSu, C., & Wen, R. (2016). Research on software project quality management based on CMMI. Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Robots and Intelligent System, ICRIS 2016, 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIS.2016.79spa
dc.relation.referencesSusha, I., & Grönlund, T. (2014). Context clues for the stall of the Citizens’ Initiative: Lessons for opening up e-participation development practice. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 454–465.spa
dc.relation.referencesSvobodová, L., & Bednarska-Olejniczak, D. (2019). SMART Cities and Applications Used for Communication with Citizens as Part of Sustainable Development: The Czech Local Scene. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11684 LNAI, 518–529spa
dc.relation.referencesTambouris, E., Liotas, N., & Tarabanis, K. (2007). A framework for assessing eParticipation projects and tools. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.13spa
dc.relation.referencesTambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Wimmer, M., Vedel, T., Lippa, B., Dalakiouridou, E., Parisopoulos, K., Rose, J., & Winkler, R. (2007). Introducing eParticipation. DEMO-Net The Democracy Network. DEMO-Net Booklet Series.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, P., Loukis, E., Wimmer, M., Loukis, E., & Wimmer, M. (2012). A Multi-Method Evaluation of Different Models of Structured Electronic Consultation on Government Policies. December 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716990spa
dc.relation.referencesTerán, L. (2015). Enhancing citizens’ participation via recommender systems. In Digital Solutions for Contemporary Democracy and Government.spa
dc.relation.referencesTerán, L., Kaskina, A., & Meier, A. (2016). Maturity model for cognitive cities: Three case studies. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 63, 37–59.spa
dc.relation.referencesThiel, S.-K. (2016a). A review of introducing game elements to e-participation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016, 3–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesThiel, S.-K. (2016b). Gamers in public participation: A boon or bane? Influence of attitudes in gamified participation platforms. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 229–240.spa
dc.relation.referencesThiel, S.-K., & Fröhlich, P. (2017). Gamification as motivation to engage in location-based public participation? Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 399–421.spa
dc.relation.referencesToots, M. (2019). Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia’s Osale.ee. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 546–559.spa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2019). UNESCO Archives - UNESCO Digital Library.spa
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nation. (2002). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective Assessing the Progress of the UN Member States. United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration.spa
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nation. (2003). UN Global E-government Survey 2003. Undesa, 1–114.spa
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nation. (2018). UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY 2018. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2018-Survey/E-Government Survey 2018_FINAL for web.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesUS GOVERNMENT. (1998). NII Cover Page.spa
dc.relation.referencesVaerst, T., Steffens, T., & Lokaiczyk, R. (2018). Concerns management, E-Government and E-participation: Experiences and findings from Germany. In E-Planning and Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vols. 3–3).spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Meerkerk, I. (2019). Top-down versus bottom-up pathways to collaboration between governments and citizens: reflecting on different participation traps. Collaboration in Public Service Delivery, September. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978583spa
dc.relation.referencesVeletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Shaw, A., Pasquini, L., & Woodward, S. (2017). Selective openness, branding, broadcasting, and promotion: Twitter use in Canada’s public universities. Educational Media International, 54(1), 1–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesVicente, M. R., & Novo, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.12.006spa
dc.relation.referencesVILLANES, E. J. B. (2015). Método Para La Evaluación De Calidad De Software. Universidad San Martin De Porres.spa
dc.relation.referencesvon der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013spa
dc.relation.referencesWahid, F., & Sæbø, Ø. (2015). Affordances and effects of promoting eparticipation through social media. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9249). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22500-5_1spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Online engagement in social media: A cross-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 137–150spa
dc.relation.referencesWeb of Science. (2018).spa
dc.relation.referencesWehn, U., Collins, K., Anema, K., Basco-Carrera, L., & Lerebours, A. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: lessons from practice. Water International, 43(1), 34–59.spa
dc.relation.referencesWehn, U., & Evers, J. (2015). The social innovation potential of ICT-enabled citizen observatories to increase eParticipation in local flood risk management. Technology in Society, 42, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesXenakis, A., & Loukis, E. (2010). An investigation of the use of structured e-forum for enhancing e-participation in parliaments. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3(2), 134–147.spa
dc.relation.referencesYu, C.-C. (2016). A value-centric business model framework for managing open data applications. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 80–115.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, L., Wei, Y., & Wang, H. (2004). Government Informatization: A Case Study. Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series, 190(27), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sresspa
dc.relation.referencesZheng, Y. (2017). Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Usage: Functionality of E-Participation Applications. Administration and Society, 49(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715593313spa
dc.relation.referencesZheng, Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2018). The Impact of Administrator Willingness on Website E-Participation: Some Evidence from Municipalities. Public Performance and Management Review, 41(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400988spa
dc.relation.referencesolotov, M. N., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2018). Continued intention to use online participatory budgeting: The effect of empowerment and habit. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 209–216.spa
dc.relation.referencesZwattendorfer, B., Hillebold, C., & Teufl, P. (2013). Secure and privacy-preserving proxy voting system. Proceedings - 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, ICEBE 2013, 472–477.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afinesspa
dc.subject.proposalParticipación electrónicaspa
dc.subject.proposale-Participaciónspa
dc.subject.proposale-participationeng
dc.subject.proposalGobierno electrónicospa
dc.subject.proposalMetodologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalEvaluaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalSoftwarespa
dc.subject.proposalElectronic participationeng
dc.subject.proposalElectronic governmenteng
dc.subject.proposalMethodologyeng
dc.subject.proposalEvaluationeng
dc.subject.proposalAssessmenteng
dc.subject.proposalSoftwareeng
dc.subject.unescoPrograma de ordenadorspa
dc.subject.unescoComputer softwareeng
dc.subject.unescoParticipación políticaspa
dc.subject.unescoPolitical participationeng
dc.subject.unescoElectronic governanceeng
dc.subject.unescoGobierno electrónicospa
dc.titleMetodología para la evaluación de herramientas de software para la e-Participaciónspa
dc.title.translatedMethodology for the evaluation of e-Participation software toolseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentGrupos comunitariosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestrosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticosspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1018448035.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
2.65 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computación
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Ingeniería - Sistemas y Computación