Construcción de un catálogo nacional de especies en línea. Caso de uso: catálogo de peces de Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorRaz, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorBuitrago Hernández, Alfred Leonardo
dc.contributor.cvlacBuitrago Hernández, Alfred Leonardo [0001337034]
dc.contributor.googlescholarBuitrago Hernández, Alfred Leonardo [Rg1NmBkAAAAJ&hl]
dc.contributor.orcidBuitrago Hernández, Alfred Leonardo [0000000204594024]
dc.contributor.researchgateBuitrago Hernández, Alfred Leonardo [Leonardo_Buitrago]
dc.coverage.countryColombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-11T14:23:54Z
dc.date.available2025-09-11T14:23:54Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-08
dc.descriptionilustraciones a color, diagramas, fotografías, mapasspa
dc.description.abstractEl Catálogo de Peces de Colombia (CPC) representa un hito en la gestión de datos de biodiversidad del país, al integrar estándares taxonómicos internacionales y garantizar la coherencia entre especies de agua dulce y marinas. Al adoptar el estándar Darwin Core y una API REST, el CPC mejora la interoperabilidad de los datos con plataformas nacionales y globales, proporcionando información taxonómica actualizada a diversos actores. Su interfaz fácil de usar permite la actualización en tiempo real de las páginas de especies, lo que facilita una gestión dinámica en comparación con listas estáticas. Aunque es integral en su cobertura, se identifican áreas de mejora, como una mejor documentación de la historia taxonómica, la integración de datos genéticos y una colaboración más sólida con entidades nacionales. Este documento también analiza la gobernanza del CPC, evaluando los roles de los actores clave e implementando métricas de calidad para valorar sus fortalezas y debilidades en comparación con otros catálogos y listas de especies. El CPC se presenta como un modelo para futuras iniciativas de biodiversidad en otros grupos biológicos, destacando la colaboración, la accesibilidad de datos y su papel crucial en los esfuerzos de conservación. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThe Catalogue of Fishes of Colombia (CFC) is a milestone in biodiversity data management for the country, integrating international taxonomic standards and ensuring consistency across freshwater and marine species. By adopting the Darwin Core standard and a REST API, the CFC enhances data interoperability with national and global platforms, providing updated taxonomic information to diverse stakeholders. Its user-friendly interface allows real-time updates of species profiles, supporting dynamic management compared to static lists. While comprehensive in coverage, areas for improvement include better documentation of taxonomic history, integration of genetic data, and stronger collaboration with national entities. This document examines the governance of the CFC as well, evaluating the roles of key actors and implementing quality metrics to assess its strengths and weaknesses in comparison to other species catalogues and checklists. The CFC serves as a model for future biodiversity initiatives in other biological groups, emphasizing collaboration, data accessibility, and its critical role in conservation efforts.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ciencias – Biología
dc.description.methodsThis study draws from the development of the Catalogue of the Fishes of Colombia (CFC), providing a detailed account of the processes and technical components involved in creating a web-based species catalogue. By outlining the platform’s construction and components, this thesis seeks to demonstrate the utility of the CFC as a repository for fundamental species information and its potential to serve as a model for other biodiversity catalogues. The catalogue, developed through collaboration among national scientists and the broader taxonomic community, also functions as a tool for data exchange between national systems and global species databases, further highlighting its role in biodiversity informatics.
dc.description.researchareaInformática de la Biodiversidad
dc.description.sponsorshipBiodiversity Information for Development (BID) is a multi-year programme funded by the European Union and led by GBIF with the aim of enhancing capacity for effective mobilization and use of biodiversity data in research and policy in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Pacific islands. Further information here https://www.gbif.org/programme/82243/bid-biodiversity-information-for-development.
dc.format.extentxi, 68 páginas + 2 anexos
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88714
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias - Maestría en Ciencias - Biología
dc.relation.referencesAcero, P. A., & Polanco, F. A. (2017). Fish biodiversity of Colombian seas: threaten richness. Revista de La Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 41(159), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.480
dc.relation.referencesAcero P A, Polanco F. A, Tavera Vargas J J (2023): Checklist of Caribbean marine fishes of Colombia. v2.0. Asociación Colombiana de Ictiólogos. Dataset/Checklist. https://doi.org/10.15472/430hyn
dc.relation.referencesAgosti, D., Groom, Q., George, T., & Güntsch, A. (2014). Strategy for improvement & interoperability of the XML schemas. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281438473
dc.relation.referencesAgosti, D. (2021). (Re)Discovering Known Biodiversity: Introduction. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 5. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.5.75491
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, E. P., & Maldonado-Ocampo, J. A. (2011). A Regional Perspective on the Diversity and Conservation of Tropical Andean Fishes. Conservation Biology, 25(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01568.x
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, R. P., Araújo, M. B., Guisan, A., Lobo, J. M., Martínez-Meyer, E., Peterson, A. T., & Soberón, J. M. (2020). Optimizing biodiversity informatics to improve information flow, data quality, and utility for science and society. Frontiers of Biogeography, 12(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21425/F5FBG47839
dc.relation.referencesArce H., M., Agudelo-Zamora, H., Polanco, A., DoNascimiento, C., Tavera, J.J., Acero, A., Villa-Navarro, F., Raz, L. (eds.). (2023). Catálogo de Peces de Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. http://catalogopecesdecolombia.unal.edu.co/en/
dc.relation.referencesBánki, O., Roskov, Y., Döring, M., Ower, G., Hernández Robles, D. R., Plata Corredor, C. A., Stjernegaard Jeppesen, T., Örn, A., Vandepitte, L., Pape, T., Hobern, D., Garnett, S., Little, H., DeWalt, R. E., Ma, K., Miller, J., Orrell, T., Aalbu, R., Abbott, J., et al. (2024). Catalogue of Life (Version 2024-09-25). Catalogue of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.48580/dgh3g
dc.relation.referencesBernal, R. Gradstein S. & Celis, M. (2016). Catálogo de plantas y líquenes de Colombia Volumen I y II Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara.
dc.relation.referencesBernal, R., S.R. Gradstein & M. Celis (eds.). (2020). Catálogo de Plantas y Líquenes de Colombia. v1.1. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Dataset/Checklist. https://doi.org/10.15472/7avdhn
dc.relation.referencesBetancur-R, R.; Broughton, R.E.; Wiley, E.O.; Carpenter, K.; López, J.A.; Li, C.; Holcroft, N.I.; Arcila, D.; Sanciangco, M.; Cureton, J.C.; Zhang, F.; (2013). The tree of life and a new classification of bony fishes. PLoS currents, 5.
dc.relation.referencesBetancur, R. R., Wiley, E. O., Arratia, G., Acero, A., Bailly, N., Miya, M., Lecointre, G., & Ortí, G. (2017). Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3
dc.relation.referencesBrazil Flora Group – BFG (2018). Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia, v.69, n.4, p.1513-1527. 2018. (DOI: 10.1590/2175-7860201869402)
dc.relation.referencesBisby, F. A. (2000). The quiet revolution: Biodiversity informatics and the internet. Science, 289(5488), 2309–2312. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5488.2309
dc.relation.referencesBingham, H., Doudin, M., Weatherdon, L., Despot-Belmonte, K., Wetzel, F., Groom, Q., Lewis, E., Regan, E., Appeltans, W., Güntsch, A., Mergen, P., Agosti, D., Penev, L., Hoffmann, A., Saarenmaa, H., Geller, G., Kim, K., Kim, H., Archambeau, A.-S., … Martin, C. (2017). The Biodiversity Informatics Landscape: Elements, Connections and Opportunities. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 3, e14059. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14059
dc.relation.referencesBlair, J., Gwiazdowski, R., Borrelli, A., Hotchkiss, M., Park, C., Perrett, G., & Hanner, R. (2020). Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study. In Biodiversity Data Journal (Vol. 8). Pensoft Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.E32765
dc.relation.referencesBorsch, T., Berendsohn, W., Dalcin, E., Delmas, M., Demissew, S., Elliott, A., Fritsch, P., Fuchs, A., Geltman, D., Güner, A., Haevermans, T., Knapp, S., le Roux, M. M., Loizeau, P. A., Miller, C., Miller, J., Miller, J. T., Palese, R., Paton, A., … Zamora, N. (2020). World Flora Online: Placing taxonomists at the heart of a definitive and comprehensive global resource on the world’s plants. Taxon, 69(6), 1311–1341. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12373
dc.relation.referencesCohen-Boulakia, S., Belhajjame, K., Collin, O., Chopard, J., Froidevaux, C., Gaignard, A., … Blanchet, C. (2017). Scientific workflows for computational reproducibility in the life sciences: Status, challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 75, 284–298. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167739X17300316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.01.012
dc.relation.referencesConvention on Biological Diversity. (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 1–14. https://www.cbd.int/article/cop15-final-text-kunming-montreal-gbf-221222
dc.relation.referencesCostello, M. J., Vanhoorne, B., & Appeltans, W. (2015). Conservation of biodiversity through taxonomy, data publication, and collaborative infrastructures. Conservation Biology, 29(4), 1094–1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12496
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, J. M., & Acero, A. (2003). Marine biodiversity in Colombia: Achievements, status of knowledge, and challenges. Gayana (Concepción), 67(2). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-65382003000200011
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Sarmiento, J. A., & Alvarez-Leon, R. (1998). Fish Biodiversity Conservation in Colombia. In B. J. Harvey, C. Ross, D. Greer, & J. Carolsfled (Eds.), Action before extinction: an international conference on conservation of fish genetic diversity. (pp. 215–223). World Fisheries Trust.
dc.relation.referencesDoNascimiento C, Herrera-Collazos EE, Herrera-R GA, Ortega-Lara A, Villa-Navarro FA, Usma-Oviedo JS, Maldonado-Ocampo JA (2017) Checklist of the freshwater fishes of Colombia: a Darwin Core alternative to the updating problem. ZooKeys 708: 25-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.708.13897
dc.relation.referencesDoNascimiento C, Agudelo-Zamora H D, Bogota-Gregory J D, Méndez-López A, Ortega-Lara A, Lasso C, Cortés-Hernández M A, Albornoz Garzón J G, Villa-Navarro F A, Netto-Ferreira A L, Lima F T C, Thomaz A, Arce H. M (2024): Lista de especies de peces de agua dulce de Colombia / Checklist of the freshwater fishes of Colombia. v2.16. Asociación Colombiana de Ictiólogos. Dataset/Checklist. https://doi.org/10.15472/numrso
dc.relation.referencesDöring, M., Jeppesen, T., & Bánki, O. (2022). Introducing ChecklistBank: An index and repository for taxonomic data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 6. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.6.93938
dc.relation.referencesDöring M., Ower G. (2019) The Catalogue of Life Data Package - A new format for exchanging nomenclatural and taxonomic information. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 3 https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.38771
dc.relation.referencesEdwards, J. L., Lane, M. A., & Nielsen, E. S. (2000). Interoperability of biodiversity databases: Biodiversity information on every desktop. In Science (Vol. 289, Issue 5488, pp. 2312–2314). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5488.2312
dc.relation.referencesFeng, X., Enquist, B. J., Park, D. S., Boyle, B., Breshears, D. D., Gallagher, R. v., Lien, A., Newman, E. A., Burger, J. R., Maitner, B. S., Merow, C., Li, Y., Huynh, K. M., Ernst, K., Baldwin, E., Foden, W., Hannah, L., Jørgensen, P. M., Kraft, N. J. B., … López-Hoffman, L. (2022). A review of the heterogeneous landscape of biodiversity databases: Opportunities and challenges for a synthesized biodiversity knowledge base. In Global Ecology and Biogeography (Vol. 31, Issue 7, pp. 1242–1260). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13497
dc.relation.referencesFlora e Funga do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Available at: < http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/>. Accessed on: 22 Oct 2024
dc.relation.referencesFricke, R., Eschmeyer, W. N. & R. van der Laan (eds) 2023. Eschemeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, references. (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp). Electronic version accessed 25 September 2023
dc.relation.referencesFroese, R. and D. Pauly. Editors. 2024. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version (06/2024)
dc.relation.referencesGadelha, L. M. R., de Siracusa, P. C., Dalcin, E. C., da Silva, L. A. E., Augusto, D. A., Krempser, E., Affe, H. M., Costa, R. L., Mondelli, M. L., Meirelles, P. M., Thompson, F., Chame, M., Ziviani, A., & de Siqueira, M. F. (2021). A survey of biodiversity informatics: Concepts, practices, and challenges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1394
dc.relation.referencesGarnett, S., Bánki, O., Barik, S., Berryman, A., Bouchard, P., Buckeridge, J., Cigliano, M., et al. (2025). Measuring the quality of species list governance. BioScience. ​​Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf071
dc.relation.referencesGarnett, S. T., Christidis, L., Conix, S., Costello, M. J., Zachos, F. E., Bánki, O. S., Bao, Y., Barik, S. K., Buckeridge, J. S., Hobern, D., Lien, A., Montgomery, N., Nikolaeva, S., Pyle, R. L., Thomson, S. A., van Dijk, P. P., Whalen, A., Zhang, Z. Q., & Thiele, K. R. (2020). Principles for creating a single authoritative list of the world’s species. PLoS Biology, 18(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000736
dc.relation.referencesGBIF: The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2024) What is GBIF?. Available from https://www.gbif.org/what-is-gbif [13 May 2024]
dc.relation.referencesGBIF Secretariat (2023). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-09-17
dc.relation.referencesGBIF (2017) Best Practices in Publishing Species Checklists, version 2.1. Copenhagen: GBIF Secretariat. https://ipt.gbif.org/manual/en/ipt/3.0/best-practices-checklists
dc.relation.referencesGodfray, H. C. J. (2002). Challenges for taxonomy. Nature, 417(6884), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/417017a
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, A., & Soacha-Godoy, K. (2015). Construyendo colaborativamente la ruta para consolidar listas de especies. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11761/9297
dc.relation.referencesGrenié M, Berti E, Carvajal-Quintero JD, Winter M, Sagouis A (2021) Matching Species Names Across Biodiversity Databases: Sources, tools, pitfalls and best practices for taxonomic harmonization. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 5: e75359. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.5.75359
dc.relation.referencesGuralnick, R., & Hill, A. (2009). Biodiversity informatics: Automated approaches for documenting global biodiversity patterns and processes. Bioinformatics, 25(4), pp. 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn659
dc.relation.referencesHobern, D., Baptiste, B., Copas, K., Guralnick, R., Hahn, A., van Huis, E., Kim, E. S., McGeoch, M., Naicker, I., Navarro, L., Noesgaard, D., Price, M., Rodrigues, A., Schigel, D., Sheffield, C. A., & Wieczorek, J. (2019). Connecting data and expertise: A new alliance for biodiversity knowledge. Biodiversity Data Journal, 7. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e33679
dc.relation.referencesHobern, D., & Miller, J. (2019). An alliance for biodiversity knowledge: Rethinking international collaboration in biodiversity informatics. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.37324
dc.relation.referencesHobern, D., Barik, S. K., Christidis, L., T. Garnett, S., Kirk, P., Orrell, T. M., Pape, T., Pyle, R. L., Thiele, K. R., Zachos, F. E., & Bánki, O. (2021). Towards a global list of accepted species VI: The Catalogue of Life checklist. Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 21(4), 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00516-w
dc.relation.referencesHeberling, M., Miller, J. T., Noesgaard, D., Weingart C , S. B., Schigel, D., & Soltis, D. E. (2021). Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018093118/-/DCSupplemental
dc.relation.referencesJosse, C. E., & Fernandez, M. (2021). Closing the Knowledge-Implementation Gap in Conservation Science. In C. C. Ferreira & C. F. C. Klütsch (Eds.), Wildlife Research Monographs Closing the Knowledge-Implementation Gap in Conservation Science (Vol. 4, pp. 255–286). http://www.springer.com/series/8826
dc.relation.referencesLevin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73(6), 1943–1967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941447
dc.relation.referencesLien, A. M., Banki, O., Barik, S. K., Buckeridge, J. S., Christidis, L., Cigliano, M. M., Conix, S., Costello, M. J., Hobern, D., Kirk, P. M., Kroh, A., Montgomery, N., Nikolaeva, S., Orrell, T. M., Pyle, R. L., Raz, L., Thiele, K., Thomson, S. A., van Dijk, P. P., … Garnett, S. T. (2023). Widespread support for a global species list with a formal governance system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(45), e2306899120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2306899120
dc.relation.referencesLutkevich, B., & Nolle, T. (2022) application programming interface (API). TechTarget https://www.techtarget.com/searchapparchitecture/definition/application-program-interface-API. Accessed 15 Abr. 2024
dc.relation.referencesMagurran, A. E. (2021). Measuring biological diversity. Current Biology, 31(19), R1174–R1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.049
dc.relation.referencesMittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M., & Gascon, C. (2011). Global Biodiversity Conservation: The Critical Role of Hotspots. In Biodiversity Hotspots (pp. 3–22). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1
dc.relation.referencesMurguía-Romero, M., Serrano-Estrada, B., Salazar, G. A., Sánchez-González, G. E., Melo-Samper-Palacios, U., Gernandt, D. S., Magallón, S., & Sánchez-Cordero, V. (2024). The IBDATA Web System for Biological Collections: Design focused on usability. In Biodiversity Informatics (Vol. 18). https://www.snib.mx/
dc.relation.referencesNelson, J.S.; Grande, T.C.; Wilson ; M.V.H.; 2016. Fishes of the world. Fifth edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 707 p.
dc.relation.referencesNoreña – P, A., González Muñoz, A., Mosquera-Rendón, J. et al. Colombia, an unknown genetic diversity in the era of Big Data. BMC Genomics 19 (Suppl 8), 859 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5194-8
dc.relation.referencesNowak, M. M., Lawenda, M., Wolniewicz, P., Urbaniak, M., & Jackowiak, B. (2022). The Adam Mickiewicz University Nature Collections IT system (AMUNATCOLL): portal, mobile application and graphical interface. https://doi.org/10.2478/biorc­2022­0002
dc.relation.referencesPadial, J.M. and De la Riva, I. (2021), A paradigm shift in our view of species drives current trends in biological classification. Biol Rev, 96: 731-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12676
dc.relation.referencesPadial, J. M., Miralles, A., de La Riva, I., & Vences, M. (2010). Open Access REVIEW The integrative future of taxonomy. In Frontiers in Zoology (Vol. 7). http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/7/1/16
dc.relation.referencesPape, T., Pyle, R., Bánki, O., Barik, S., Berryman, A., Bouchard, P., Buckeridge, J., et al., (2025). Measuring the quality of species list contents. BioScience. ​​Advance online publication.
dc.relation.referencesParr C, Guralnick R, Cellinese N, Page RM (2012) Evolutionary informatics: unifying knowledge about the diversity of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27 (2): 94‑103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.001
dc.relation.referencesPeng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847
dc.relation.references​​Peterson, A. T., Vieglais, D. A., Navarro Sigüenza, A. G., & Silva, M. (2003). A global distributed biodiversity information network: building the world museum. Bulletin-British Ornithologists Club, 123, 186–196.
dc.relation.referencesPeterson, T., Knapp, S., Guralnick, R., Soberó N, J., & Holder, M. T. (2010). The big questions for biodiversity informatics. Systematics and Biodiversity, 8(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772001003739369
dc.relation.referencesPyle, R. L., Barik, S. K., Christidis, L., Conix, S., Costello, M. J., van Dijk, P. P., Garnett, S. T., Hobern, D., Kirk, P. M., Lien, A. M., Orrell, T. M., Remsen, D., Thomson, S. A., Wambiji, N., Zachos, F. E., Zhang, Z. Q., & Thiele, K. R. (2021). Towards a global list of accepted species V. The devil is in the detail. Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 21(4), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00504-0
dc.relation.referencesRaz L, Agudelo Zamora H (2023). Catálogo de Plantas y Líquenes de Colombia. Version 1.3. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15472/7avdhn accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-10-22.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Zapata, M. A., & Ruiz-Agudelo, C. A. (2021). Environmental liabilities in Colombia: A critical review of current status and challenges for a megadiverse country. In Environmental Challenges (Vol. 5). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100377
dc.relation.referencesRuggiero, M. A., Gordon, D. P., Orrell, T. M., Bailly, N., Bourgoin, T., Brusca, R. C., Cavalier-Smith, T., Guiry, M. D., & Kirk, P. M. (2015). A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS ONE, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248
dc.relation.referencesSandall, E. L., Maureaud, A. A., Guralnick, R., McGeoch, M. A., Sica, Y. V., Rogan, M. S., Booher, D. B., Edwards, R., Franz, N., Ingenloff, K., Lucas, M., Marsh, C. J., McGowan, J., Pinkert, S., Ranipeta, A., Uetz, P., Wieczorek, J., & Jetz, W. (2023). A globally integrated structure of taxonomy to support biodiversity science and conservation. In Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.08.004
dc.relation.referencesSiB Colombia (2024, abril 30) Portal Listas de Especies, Sistema de Información sobre Biodiversidad de Colombia. Recuperado de: https://listas.biodiversidad.co/
dc.relation.referencesTavera Vargas J J, Polanco F. A, Beltrán León B S, Zapata Padilla L A, Zapata F, Agudelo Zamora H D, Acero P A (2023): Checklist of Pacific marine fishes of Colombia. v2.0. Asociación Colombiana de Ictiólogos. Dataset/Checklist. https://doi.org/10.15472/kmsezq
dc.relation.referencesThiele, K. R., Conix, S., Pyle, R. L., Barik, S. K., Christidis, L., Mark, &, Costello, J., Paul Van Dijk, P., Kirk, P., Lien, A., Thomson, S. A., Zachos, F. E., Zhang, Z.-Q., & Garnett, S. T. (2021). Towards a global list of accepted species I. Why taxonomists sometimes disagree, and why this matters. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 21, 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00495-y/Published
dc.relation.referencesThomson, S.A., Thiele, K., Conix, S. et al. Towards a global list of accepted species II. Consequences of inadequate taxonomic list governance. Org Divers Evol 21, 623–630 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00518-8
dc.relation.referencesTorres-Mejía, M., Beltrán, N., & Llano, S. (2016). Listas de especies: Lineamientos conceptuales y metodológicos para su consolidación en Colombia. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11761/9844
dc.relation.referencesvan der Laan, R., Fricke, R. & Eschmeyer, W. N. (eds) 2023. Eschemeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: Classification. (http://www.calacademy.org/scientists/catalog-of-fishes-classification/). Electronic version accessed 15 Sep. 2023.
dc.relation.referencesVargas, C. A., Bottin, M., Sarkinen, T., Richardson, J. E., Celis, M., Villanueva, B., & Sanchez, A. (2023). How to fill the biodiversity data gap: Is it better to invest in fieldwork or curation? Plant Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2023.06.003
dc.relation.referencesWieczorek, J., Bloom, D., Guralnick, R., Blum, S., Döring, M., Giovanni, R., Robertson, T., & Vieglais, D. (2012). Darwin core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS ONE, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029715
dc.relation.referencesWilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J. W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
dc.relation.referencesWilson, E. O. (2003). The encyclopedia of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(2), 77–80. http://tree.trends.com
dc.relation.referencesWoRMS Editorial Board (2024). World Register of Marine Species. Available from https://www.marinespecies.org at VLIZ. Accessed 2024-10-21. doi:10.14284/170
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.bneBiodiversidad acuática -- Conservaciónspa
dc.subject.bneAquatic biodiversity conservationeng
dc.subject.ddc577 - Ecologíaspa
dc.subject.ddc000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::004 - Procesamiento de datos Ciencia de los computadores
dc.subject.ddc597 - Vertebrados de sangre fríaspa
dc.subject.lembIctiologíaspa
dc.subject.lembIchthyologyeng
dc.subject.lembPeces -- Catálogosspa
dc.subject.lembFishes -- Catalogseng
dc.subject.lembConservación de especies -- Procesamiento de datosspa
dc.subject.lembPeces -- Distribución geográficaspa
dc.subject.lembFishes -- Geographical distributioneng
dc.subject.lembPeces -- Especímenesspa
dc.subject.lembFishes -- Specimenseng
dc.subject.otherSistema de Información sobre Biodiversidadspa
dc.subject.otherInterconectividad (Telecomunicaciones)spa
dc.subject.otherInternetworking (Telecommunication)eng
dc.subject.proposalInformática de la biodiversidadspa
dc.subject.proposalIctiologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalInteroperabilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalToma de decisionesspa
dc.subject.proposalBiodiversity informaticseng
dc.subject.proposalIchthyologyeng
dc.subject.proposalInteroperabilityeng
dc.subject.proposalDecision-makingeng
dc.titleConstrucción de un catálogo nacional de especies en línea. Caso de uso: catálogo de peces de Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedDevelopment of an online species catalogue. A case study from the catalogue of fishes of Colombiaeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.awardtitleCatalogue of the Fishes of Colombia
oaire.fundernameEuropean Union

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
1026550786-2025.pdf
Tamaño:
4.66 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias – Biología
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Annex I. Content metrics CFC.pdf
Tamaño:
30.44 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Anexo I
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Annex II. Governance metrics CFC.pdf
Tamaño:
62.52 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Anexo II
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Ciencias - Biología