Análisis de la equivalencia sustancial de maíz off patent (evento TC1507) con resistencia a insectos y con tolerancia al herbicida glufosinato de amonio

dc.contributor.advisorChaparro Giraldo, Alejandro
dc.contributor.advisorAcosta Losada, Orlando
dc.contributor.authorSuárez Rodríguez, Hernán Darío
dc.contributor.researchgroupIngeniería Genética de Plantasspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T22:32:07Z
dc.date.available2021-11-25T22:32:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractEste estudio fue diseñado para realizar el análisis de la equivalencia sustancial del maíz off patent (evento TC1507), que contiene los genes que codifican para las proteínas CRY1F y PAT, que le confieren resistencia a insectos lepidópteros y tolerancia al herbicida glufosinato de amonio. Se llevó a cabo una revisión tecnológica para recopilar los estudios con los que se sustentó la equivalencia sustancial en Colombia y en las principales agencias regulatorias en el mundo el evento de maíz transgénico TC1507, junto con el análisis de la equivalencia sustancial que se realizó a partir de la comparación de los niveles de los componentes nutricionales de los analitos proximales en los tejidos de grano y forraje de los genotipos off patent de plantas de maíz transgénicas y genotipos de maíz convencional. Los niveles de los analitos evaluados en las plantas transgénicas se encontraron dentro de los rangos publicados en la literatura para el maíz no transgénico y fueron estadísticamente no significativos del maíz convencional del cual derivan (líneas elite de maíz). Estos resultados constituyeron una parte de la evidencia con la que se sustentaron y solicitaron ante las instituciones regulatorias nacionales, INVIMA e ICA, la autorización para consumo de seres humanos y animales en Colombia, del primer maíz transgénico en el mundo desarrollado con base en tecnologías que están en dominio público. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to carry out the substantial equivalence analysis of the off patent corn event TC1507, which contains the genes that code for the CRY1F and PAT proteins, which confer resistance to lepidopteran insects and tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate ammonium, respectively. A review was carried out aimed at gathering information on the studies that supported substantial equivalence in Colombia and on those of the main regulatory agencies throughout the world about the transgenic corn event TC1507. Substantial equivalence analysis also included comparison of nutritional component levels from tests for proximate analytes present in grain and forage tissues from both transgenic off patent corn and conventional corn genotypes. Analyte levels assessed in transgenic plants were found within the ranges published in the literature for non-transgenic corn and were statistically indistinguishable from the conventional corn from which they were derived (elite corn lines). These results are part of the evidence that supported the application submitted to the national regulatory institutions INVIMA and ICA in order to obtain authorization for animal and human consumption. This is the first domestically developed corn genotype containing the off-patent event TC-1507, since the technology that made it possible is already in the public domain.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.description.researchareaGenética y Fitomejoramientospa
dc.format.extentxi, 74 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80731
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de posgradosspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá - Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Agrarias - Maestría en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.relation.referencesAFSI (2020) Crop Composition Database, Version 8.0, Agriculture & Food Systems Institute www.cropcomposition.orgspa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. A., Hong, B., Moellring, E., TeRonde, S., Walker, C., Wang, Y., & Maxwell, C. (2019). Composition of forage and grain from genetically modified DP202216 maize is equivalent to non-modified conventional maize ( Zea mays L.). GM Crops & Food, 10(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2019.1609849spa
dc.relation.referencesAnon. (2007). EPPO Guideline for the efficacy Evaluation of plant protection products: Design and Analysis of Efficacy Evaluation Trials, PP 1/152(3). EPPO/OEPP, Paris. pp. 139–145.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, J. M., Hawkins, N. D., Ward, J. L., Lovegrove, A., Napier, J. A., Shewry, P. R., & Beale, M. H. (2006). A metabolomic study of substantial equivalence of field-grown genetically modified wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 4(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00197.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBaktavachalam, G. B., Delaney, B., Fisher, T. L., Ladics, G. S., Layton, R. J., Locke, M. E., Schmidt, J., Anderson, J. A., Weber, N. N., Herman, R. A., & Evans, S. L. (2015). Transgenic maize event TC1507: Global status of food, feed, and environmental safety. GM Crops & Food, 6(2), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2015.1054093spa
dc.relation.referencesBell, E., Nakai, S., & Burzio, L. A. (2018). Stacked Genetically Engineered Trait Products Produced by Conventional Breeding Reflect the Compositional Profiles of Their Component Single Trait Products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 66(29), 7794-7804. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02317spa
dc.relation.referencesBevan, M., Flavell, R. B., and Chilton, M. D. (1983). A chimaeric antibiotic resistance gene as a selectable marker for plant cell transformation. Nature 304, 184–187. doi: 10.1038/304184a0spa
dc.relation.referencesBrent, P., Bittisnich, D., Brooke-Taylor, S., Galway, N., Graf, L., Healy, M., & Kelly, L. (2003). Regulation of genetically modified foods in Australia and New Zealand. Food Control, 14(6), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00037-9spa
dc.relation.referencesBrookes, G. & Barfoot, P. (2018). Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996–2016, GM Crops & Food, 9:2, 59-89spa
dc.relation.referencesCarpenter, J. E. (2010). Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops. Nat Biotech 28, 319–321.spa
dc.relation.referencesCerdeira, A. L., Gazziero, D. L. P., Duke, S. O., & Matallo, M. B. (2011). Agricultural Impacts of Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Cultivation in South America. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(11), 5799-5807. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102652yspa
dc.relation.referencesCheng, K. C., Beaulieu, J., Iquira, E., Belzile, F. J., Fortin, M. G., & Strömvik, M. V. (2008). Effect of Transgenes on Global Gene Expression in Soybean Is within the Natural Range of Variation of Conventional Cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(9), 3057-3067. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf073505ispa
dc.relation.referencesChrispeels, M.J., (2014). Global production and consumption of genetically engineered crops. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 33, 120–132.spa
dc.relation.referencesCodex Alimentarius. (2003). Codex principles and guidelines on foods derived from biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, FAO, Rome.spa
dc.relation.referencesCodex Alimentarius Commission (2013). Codex Standard for Named Vegetable Oils. Rome (Italy): Codex Alimentarius;. p. 16.spa
dc.relation.referencesCong, B., Maxwell, C., Luck, S., Vespestad, D., Richard, K., Mickelson, J., & Zhong, C. (2015). Genotypic and Environmental Impact on Natural Variation of Nutrient Composition in 50 Non Genetically Modified Commercial Maize Hybrids in North America. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63(22), 5321-5334. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01764spa
dc.relation.referencesDuke, S. O. & Cerdeira, A. L. (2010). Transgenic crops for herbicide resistance, Vol. 2. Springer: Heidelberg, Germany.spa
dc.relation.referencesEFSA Application for renewal: Feed produced from 1507 maize. Summary of the application for renewal of authorisation of existing products according to article 23 of regulation (EC) no 1829/2003. Feed produced from genetically modified 1507 maize (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1). [internet] (2004). Disponible en: https://euginius.eu/euginius/api/literature/pdf/9095514491964051003spa
dc.relation.referencesEFSA Opinion of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms on a request from the commission related to the notification (Reference C/NL/00/10) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507, for import and processing, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Pioneer Hi-Bred International/ Mycogen Seeds (Question No EFSA-Q-2004-011). EFSA J (2004a); 124: 1–18; http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2004.124spa
dc.relation.referencesEFSA Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (reference EFSA-GMO-NL-2004-02) for the placing on the market of insect-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507, for food use, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Pioneer Hi-Bred International/Mycogen Seeds, The EFSA Journal (2005) 182, 1-22. [Internet]. Disponible en: https://euginius.eu/euginius/api/literature/pdf/-1436758519488164233spa
dc.relation.referencesEFSA Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on an application (EFSA-GMO-RX-1507) for renewal of authorisation for the continued marketing of existing products produced from maize 1507 for feed use, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. / Mycogen Seeds. EFSA J (2009). a; 1138:1–11; http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1138spa
dc.relation.referencesEFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on genetically modified organisms), Naegeli H, Birch AN, Casacuberta J, De Schrijver A, Gralak MA, Guerche P, Jones H, Manachini B, Messe an A, Nielsen EE, Nogue F, Robaglia C, Rostoks N, Sweet J, Tebbe C, Visioli F, Wal J-M , Alvarez F, Ardizzone M, Mestdagh S and Ramon M, 2017. Scientific opinion on an application for renewal of authorisation for continued marketing of maize 1507 and derived food and feed submitted under Articles 11 and 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Pioneer Overseas Corporation and Dow AgroSciences LLC. EFSA Journal (2017);15(1):4659, 11 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4659spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO/OMS. (1996). Biotecnología e inocuidad de los alimentos. Informe de una Consulta FAO/OMS, 30 de septiembre-4 de octubre de 1996. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, Roma y Organización Mundial de la Salud, Ginebra.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO/OMS. (2000). Aspectos relativos a la inocuidad de los alimentos de origen vegetal modificados genéticamente. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, Roma, y Organización Mundial de la Salud, Ginebra.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. (2010). Food Quality and Standards Service has published GM food safety assessment: Tools for trainers’, Pesticide & Toxic Chemical News, no. 12spa
dc.relation.referencesFraley, R. (2015). Presentation to the National Academy of Sciences. Disponible en:https://vimeo.com/album/3192610/video/115717420spa
dc.relation.referencesFSANZ. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Food derived from insect-protected and glufosinate-ammonium tolerant corn line 1507. A safety assessment. Technical report series no. 32. [Internet]. 2004. Disponible en: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/publications/documents/32_TRX%20A446%20-%20Corn%20line%201507.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFSANZ. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Draft assessment. Report application a446 food derived from insect-protected and glufosinate-ammonium tolerant corn line 1507. [Internet]. 2002. Disponible en: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/code/applications/documents/A446%20DAR%20-%20GM%20Corn.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFSANZ. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Final assessment report application a446 insect-protected and glufosinate ammonium-tolerant corn line 1507. [Internet]. 2003. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/ACF18.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, R.E., (2014). Biosafety: evaluation and regulation of genetically modified (GM) crops in the United States. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 33, 85–114.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarlander, S. K. (2002). The evolution of modern agriculture and its future with biotechnology. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 21, 161S165S.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrigan, G. G., Glenn, K. C., & Ridley, W. P. (2010). Assessing the natural variability in crop composition. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 58(3, Supplement), S13-S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.023spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrigan, G. G., Lundry, D., Drury, S., Berman, K., Riordan, S. G., Nemeth, M. A., Ridley, W. P., & Glenn, K. C. (2010a). Natural variation in crop composition and the impact of transgenesis. Nature Biotechnology, 28(5), 402-404. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0510-402spa
dc.relation.referencesHerman, R. A., & Price, W. D. (2013). Unintended Compositional Changes in Genetically Modified (GM) Crops: 20 Years of Research. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(48), 11695-11701. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400135rspa
dc.relation.referencesHerrera-Estrella, L., Depicker, A., Van Montagu, M., and Schell, J. (1983). Expression of chimeric genes transferred into plant cells using a Ti-plasmid derived vector. Nature 303, 209–213. doi: 10.1038/303209a0spa
dc.relation.referencesHothorn L.A. and Oberdoerfer R. (2006). Statistical analysis used in the nutritional assessment of novel food using the proof of safety. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 44: 125-135.spa
dc.relation.referencesICA Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. Resolución No. 003745 (15 de diciembre de 2006 ). Por la cual se establece que el maíz con la tecnología Herculex I®, evento TC 1507 es apto para consumo como alimento de animales domésticos en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/f1b4c01b-b802-4cff-ae51-db9787833a4d/3745.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesICA Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. Resolución 000879 (2008). Por la cual no se autoriza la importación de semillas de maíz MON- 88017-3 (CCR) al país. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/fdbea15a-b473-4d08-bb1d-aec81acf405b/2008R879.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesICA Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. Resolución 003662 (2011). Por la cual se autoriza el empleo del maíz SmartStax TM (MON-89Ø34-3 x DAS- Ø15Ø7-1 x MON- 88Ø17-3 x DAS-59122-7), para consumo directo y/o como materia prima para la producción de alimentos para animales domésticos. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/3bcf82f7-262e-4760-9218-71a08261e92b/2011R3662.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesICA Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. Resolución 003050 (2013). Por la cual se autoriza el uso del maíz MON89034 x 1507 x NK603 (MON-89Ø34-3 x DAS- Ø15Ø7-1 x MONØØ6Ø3-6) para consumo directo y/o como materia prima para la producción de alimentos para animales domésticos. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/3b3a12fe-8289-4c02-88e4-a8998cb7bec4/2013R3050.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesINVIMA Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos. Acta 05/06 (2006). Comisión revisora de medicamentos y productos biológicos, de alimentos y bebidas alcohólicas, de insumos para la salud y productos varios. Conceptuar sobre el empleo del producto: granos de maíz, provenientes de híbridos de maíz con tecnología Bt Herculex I. (2006). Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet]. Disponible en: http://bch.biodiv.org/database/attachedfile.aspx?id=1036spa
dc.relation.referencesINVIMA Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos. Resolución No. 2018027808 (2018). Por la cual se autoriza el uso de Maíz TC1507 x MIR604 x NK603 (DAS-01507-1 x SYN-IR604-5 x MON-00603-6) como materia prima para la producción de alimentos para consumo humano. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet]. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/Resoluci%C3%B3n%202018027808%20de%202018.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesJames C (2010) In Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. ISAAA Briefs No. 42. ISAAA, Ithaka, NYspa
dc.relation.referencesJefferson, D. J., Graff, G. D., Chi-Ham, C. L., and Bennet, A. B. (2015). The emergence of AgBiogenerics. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 819–823.spa
dc.relation.referencesJiménez-Barreto, Jenny, Chaparro-Giraldo, Alejandro, Mora-Oberlaender, Julián, & Vargas-Sánchez, José Ever. (2016). Molecular characterization and Freedom to Operate analysis of maize hybrids from genetically modified and Colombian varieties. Agronomía Colombiana, 34(3), 309-316. https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n3.60350spa
dc.relation.referencesJonas, D.A., Antignac, E., Antoine, J.M., Classen, H.G., Huggett, A., Knudsen, I., Mahler, J., Ockhuizen, T., Smith, M., Teuber, M., Walker, R., De Vogel, P., (1996). The safety assessment of novel foods. Guidelines prepared by ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 931–940.spa
dc.relation.referencesKok, E. J., Pedersen, J. W., Onori, R., Sowa, S., Schauzu, M., De Schrijver, A., & Teeri, T. H. (2014). Plants with stacked genetically modified events: To assess or not to assess?. Trends in Biotechnology, 32(2), 70-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesKowalski S., Ebora R., Kryder R., Potter R. (2002). Transgenic crops, biotechnology and ownership rights: what scientists need to know? Plant Journal. 31(4): 407-421.spa
dc.relation.referencesKönig, A., Cockburn, A., Crevel, R. W. R., Debruyne, E.,Grafstroem, R., Hammerling, U., Kimber, I., Knudsen, I.,Kuiper, H. A., Peijnenburg, A.A.C.M., Penninks, A. H.,P Oulsen, M., Schauza,M.&Wal, J. M. (2004). Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology 42, 1047–1088spa
dc.relation.referencesKryder, R, Kowalski, S, Krattiger, A. (2000). The Intellectual and Technical Property Components of pro-Vitamin A Rice (GoldenRiceTM): A Preliminary Freedom-To-Operate Review. ISAAA Briefs No. 20.ISAAA: Ithaca, NY. P 56.spa
dc.relation.referencesLai, F.-M., Privalle, L., Mei, K., Ghoshal, D., Shen, Y., Klucinec, J., Daeschner, K., Mankin, L. S., Chen, N., Cho, S., & Jones, T. (2011). Evaluation of the E. colid-serine ammonia lyase gene (Ec. DsdA) for use as a selectable marker in maize transformation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 47(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-011-9351-xspa
dc.relation.referencesLundry, D. R., Burns, J. A., Nemeth, M. A., & Riordan, S. G. (2013). Composition of Grain and Forage from Insect-Protected and Herbicide-Tolerant Corn, MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 88017 × DAS-59122-7 (SmartStax), Is Equivalent to That of Conventional Corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(8), 1991-1998. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf304005nspa
dc.relation.referencesMcDougall, P. (2011). The Cost and Time Involved in the Discovery, Development and Authorisation of a New Plant Biotechnology Derived Trait. Disponible en: https://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf_files/Getting-a-BiotechCrop-to-Market-Phillips-McDougall-Study.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMSPS Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 1486 (2012). Por la cual se autoriza el uso de granos de maíz, provenientes de híbridos de maíz genéticamente modificado, con la tecnología HX1 x HRW x NK603 (DAS-15Ø7-1 x DAS-59122-7 x MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) como alimento o materia prima para la producción de alimentos de consumo humano. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/Resolucion%201486%20de%202012.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMSPS Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 1487 (2012a). Por la cual se autoriza el uso de granos de maíz, provenientes de híbridos de maíz genéticamente modificado, con la tecnología HX1 x MON810 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 x MON-ØØ81Ø-6) como alimento o materia prima para la producción de alimentos para consumo humano. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/Resolucion%201487%20de%202012.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMSPS Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 1488 (2012b). Por la cual se autoriza el uso de granos de maíz, provenientes de híbridos de maíz genéticamente modificado, con la tecnología HX1 x MON810 x NK603 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 x MON-ØØ81Ø-6 x MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) como alimento o materia prima para la producción de alimentos para consumo humano. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/Resolucion%201488%20de%202012.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMSPS Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 1861 (2014) Por la cual se autoriza el uso de Maíz MON89034 x TC1507 x NK603 (MON-89034-3 x DAS-01507-1 x MON-00603-6) como alimento o materia prima para la elaboración de alimentos de consumo humano. Bogotá, Colombia. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/Resolucion%201861%20de%202014.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesNewman M.C. (2008). “What exactly are you inferring?” A loser look at hypothesis testing. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 27: 1013-1019.spa
dc.relation.referencesNoushahi, H. A., & Hussain, M. (2020). Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants: A Review. Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcs/2020/v5i330095spa
dc.relation.referencesNovak, W. K., & Haslberger, A. G. (2000). Substantial equivalence of antinutrients and inherent plant toxins in genetically modified novel foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 38(6), 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00040-5spa
dc.relation.referencesOberdoerfer R.B., Shillito R.D., de Beuckeleer M and Mitten D.H. (2005). Rice (Oryza sativa L.) containing the bar gene is compositionally equivalent to the nontransgenic counterpart. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53: 1457-1465spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (1993) Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology: Concepts and Principles. Recuperado 18 de noviembre de 2020, de https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Safety_Evaluation_of_Foods_Derived_by_Modern_B.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesOECD, (1996). Food Safety and Evaluation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD, (1997). Report of OECD Workshop on the Toxicological and Nutritional Testing of Novel Foods. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (1999) Consensus document on general information concerning the genes and their enzymes that confer tolerance to phosphinothricin herbicide. Series on harmonisation of regulatory oversight in biotechnology, number 11, ENV/JM/MONO(99)13. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD, (2001a). Consensus document on key nutrients and key toxicants in low erucic acid rapeseed (canola). In: Environmental Directorate: Joint Meeting of Chemical Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology: Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD, (2001b). Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of soybean: key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. In: Environmental Directorate: Joint meeting of Chemical Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology: Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD (2002) Module II: herbicide biochemistry, herbicide metabolism and the residues in glufosinate-ammonium (phosphinothricin)-tolerant transgenic plants. Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, Number 25, ENV/JM/MONO 14. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD (2003) Consensus document on the biology of Zea mays subsp. mays (Maize). Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, Number 27, ENV/JM/MONO(2003)11. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developmentspa
dc.relation.referencesOECD, (2004a). Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of rice (Oryza sativa): key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. In: Environmental Directorate: Joint meeting of Chemical Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology: Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD, (2004b). Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense): key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. In: Environmental Directorate: Joint meeting of Chemical Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology: Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2007) Consensus document on safety information on transgenic plants expressing Bacillus thuringiensis-derived insect control proteins. Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, Number 42. ENV/JM/MONO(2007)14. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developmentspa
dc.relation.referencesParrott, W., Chassy, B., Ligon, J., Meyer, L., Petrick, J., Zhou, J., Herman, R., Delaney, B., & Levine, M. (2010). Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48(7), 1773-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.017spa
dc.relation.referencesPilacinski, W., Crawford, A., Downey, R., Harvey, B., Huber, S., Hunst, P., Lahman, L. K., MacIntosh, S., Pohl, M., Rickard, C., Tagliani, L., & Weber, N. (2011). Plants with genetically modified events combined by conventional breeding: an assessment of the need for additional regulatory data. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 49(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.11.004spa
dc.relation.referencesPrice, W. D., & Underhill, L. (2013). Application of Laws, Policies, and Guidance from the United States and Canada to the Regulation of Food and Feed Derived from Genetically Modified Crops: Interpretation of Composition Data. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(35), 8349-8355. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf401178dspa
dc.relation.referencesPrivalle, L. S., Gillikin, N., & Wandelt, C. (2013). Bringing a Transgenic Crop to Market: Where Compositional Analysis Fits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(35), 8260-8266. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400185qspa
dc.relation.referencesReed, J., Privalle, L., Powell, M. L., Meghji, M., Dawson, J., Dunder, E., Sutthe, J., Wenck, A., Launis, K., Kramer, C., Chang, Y.-F., Hansen, G., & Wright, M. (2001). Phosphomannose isomerase: An efficient selectable marker for plant transformation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 37(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-001-0024-zspa
dc.relation.referencesRidley, W.P., Harrigan, G.G., Breeze, M.L., Nemeth, M.A., Sidhu, R.S., Glenn, K.C., (2011). Evaluation of compositional equivalence for multitrait biotechnology crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 5865–5876.spa
dc.relation.referencesRüdelsheim, P., Dumont, P., Freyssinet, G., Pertry, I., & Heijde, M. (2018). Off-Patent Transgenic Events: Challenges and Opportunities for New Actors and Markets in Agriculture. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00071spa
dc.relation.referencesSpilke J., Piepho H.P. and Hu X. (2005). A simulation study on tests of hypotheses and confidence intervals for fixed effects in mixed models for blocked experiments with missing data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 10: 374-389spa
dc.relation.referencesStauffer C, Zeph L (2000). Compositional analysis of maize MPS hybrid line 1507. Johnston, IA: Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc; and Des Moines, IA: Woodson-Tenet Laboratories, Inc; Jul. 34p. Technical Report No.: 98-09-RA-NGLP-012spa
dc.relation.referencesSult, T., Barthet, V. J., Bennett, L., Edwards, A., Fast, B., Gillikin, N., Launis, K., New, S., Rogers-Szuma, K., Sabbatini, J., Srinivasan, J. R., Tilton, G. B., & Venkatesh, T. V. (2016). Report: Release of the International Life Sciences Institute Crop Composition Database Version 5. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 51, 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2016.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, M., Bickel, A., Mannion, R., Bell, E., & Harrigan, G. G. (2017). Dicamba-Tolerant Soybeans ( Glycine max L.) MON 87708 and MON 87708 × MON 89788 Are Compositionally Equivalent to Conventional Soybean. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65(36), 8037-8045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03844spa
dc.relation.referencesTempelman R.J. (2004). Experimental design and statistical methods for classical and bioequivalence hypothesis testing with an application to dairy nutrition studies. Journal of Animal Science, 82: E162-E172.spa
dc.relation.referencesUSDA APHIS Petition for the determination of non-regulated status B.t. Cry1F insect resistant, glufosinate tolerant maize line. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; [IRecuperado 18 de noviembre de 2020] 2000. Disponible en: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/00_13601p.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesUSDA APHIS Decision on Mycogen Seeds c/o Dow AgroSciences LLC and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. petition 00-136-01P seeking a determination of non-regulated status for Bt Cry1F insect resistant, glufosinate tolerant corn line 1507[ Recuperado 18 de noviembre de 2020] 2001. Disponible en: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/00_13601p_com.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesUSDA APHIS Application for an Extension of the Determination of Nonregulated Status for B.t. Cry1F insect-Resistant, Glufosinate-Tolerant Maize (00-136-01p): Maize Line 6275. [Recuperado 18 de noviembre de 2020] 2004. Disponible en: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/03_18101p.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVKM (2017) Risk assessment of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize 1507 for cultivation, import, processing, food and feed uses under Directive 2001/18/EC (C/ES/01/01, C/NL/00/10) and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/NL/2004/02, EFSA/GMO/RX/1507). Opinion of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety, Oslo, Norway. ISBN: 978-82 -8259-278-9spa
dc.relation.referencesWatson SA. (1982). Corn: amazing Maize. General Properties. In: Wolff IA, editor. CRC Handbook of Processing and Utilization in Agriculture. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press;. p. 3–29.spa
dc.relation.referencesWellek S. (2002). Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. CRC Press, ISBN: 1584881607, 284 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalters S.J. (2008). Consultants’ forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done? Pharmaceutical Statistics, published online DOI: 10.1002/pst.334.spa
dc.relation.referencesWolff T. (2008). Freedom-to-Operate: my six basic rules. Searcher Magazine 16: 34-39.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.armarcCorn - breeding
dc.subject.ddc630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadasspa
dc.subject.lembMejoramiento selectivo del maízspa
dc.subject.proposalOff patenteng
dc.subject.proposalTransgenic corn eventeng
dc.subject.proposalSubstantial equivalenceeng
dc.subject.proposalNutritional compositioneng
dc.subject.proposalCompositional analysiseng
dc.subject.proposalMaíz transgénicospa
dc.subject.proposalEquivalencia sustancialspa
dc.subject.proposalComposición de nutrientesspa
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis composicionalspa
dc.titleAnálisis de la equivalencia sustancial de maíz off patent (evento TC1507) con resistencia a insectos y con tolerancia al herbicida glufosinato de amoniospa
dc.title.translatedSubstantial equivalence analysis of off-patent corn (event TC1507) with insect resistance and glufosinate-ammonium herbicide tolerance
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentDataPaperspa
dc.type.contentImagespa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticosspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.fundernameFENALCEspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
TesisMSc_hdsuarezr.pdf
Tamaño:
1.33 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias Agrarias

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: