Análisis de la formulación de la Política Pública de Discapacidad de Bogotá Decreto 470 de 2007
Cargando...
Autores
Director
Tipo de contenido
Document language:
Español
Fecha
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Documentos PDF
Resumen
Este trabajo se propone realizar una mirada retrospectiva de la actual política distrital de discapacidad, Decreto 470 de 2007, evaluando su proceso de formulación desde la participación de los actores y sectores que participaron en este ejercicio, con el objetivo de realizar recomendaciones para procesos futuros de construcción de política públic a. Se realizó una investigación de con una metodología cualitativa, de corte descriptivo. Se utilizó la entrevista como instrumento de recolección de información aplicada a actores claves. La información que proporcionan los actores seleccionados para la investigación, trata sobre sus experiencias frente al proceso de construcción de la políti ca pú blica distrital de discapacidad El análisis de la información se realizó a través cuatro categorías de análisis: 1. Concepción de la problemática, 2. Fines y Objetiv os, 3. Relaciones y 4. Recursos. L as categorías fueron abstraídas luego del análisis que arrojaron los conceptos básicos de política pública, formulación de política pública, teoría de élites , teoría pluralista y ejercicio de poder . L os resultados revela n el papel y los intereses de cada actor c on base a las cuatro categorías. L as conclu siones princ ipales destacan la ausencia de participación amplia y democrática de todos los sectores sociales, los intereses individuales que priman en diferentes sectores y la participación a los principales dolientes de la problemática que desarrolla la p olítica pública, en este caso la comunidad.
Abstract: This paper aims to take a retrospective look at the current district disability policy (Decreto 470 de 2007), evaluating its formulation process with the perspective of participation of actors and sectors that are enroled in this exercise. With the objective of making recommendations for future processe s o f construction of public policy. W e conducted a qualitative and descriptive research. The interview was used as an instrument for the collection of information applied to key actors about their experiences in the process of construction of the district public policy of disability. The analysis was done in four categories of analysis: 1. Conception of the problematic, 2. Purposes and Objectives, 3. Relationships and 4. Resources, categories were abstracted after analysis of the basic concepts of public policy, public policy formulation, theory of elites , pluralist theory and exercise of power . The results reveal the role and interests of each actor based on the four categories. The main conclusions were the lack of broad and democratic participation of all social sectors, the individual interests that prevail in different sectors, and the participation to the main mourners of the problematic that develops the public policy, in this case the community.
Abstract: This paper aims to take a retrospective look at the current district disability policy (Decreto 470 de 2007), evaluating its formulation process with the perspective of participation of actors and sectors that are enroled in this exercise. With the objective of making recommendations for future processe s o f construction of public policy. W e conducted a qualitative and descriptive research. The interview was used as an instrument for the collection of information applied to key actors about their experiences in the process of construction of the district public policy of disability. The analysis was done in four categories of analysis: 1. Conception of the problematic, 2. Purposes and Objectives, 3. Relationships and 4. Resources, categories were abstracted after analysis of the basic concepts of public policy, public policy formulation, theory of elites , pluralist theory and exercise of power . The results reveal the role and interests of each actor based on the four categories. The main conclusions were the lack of broad and democratic participation of all social sectors, the individual interests that prevail in different sectors, and the participation to the main mourners of the problematic that develops the public policy, in this case the community.