En 7 día(s), 2 hora(s) y 31 minuto(s): El Repositorio Institucional UNAL informa a la comunidad universitaria que, con motivo del periodo de vacaciones colectivas, el servicio de publicación estará suspendido: Periodo de cierre: Del 20 de diciembre al 18 de enero de 2026. Sobre los depósitos: Durante este tiempo, los usuarios podrán continuar realizando el depósito respectivo de sus trabajos en la plataforma. Reanudación: Una vez reiniciadas las actividades administrativas, los documentos serán revisados y publicados en orden de llegada.

Modelo de evaluación de sistemas interorganizacionales de información

dc.contributor.advisorDíaz Pinzón, Beatriz Helenaspa
dc.contributor.authorBeltrán Molina, Miguel Ángelspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación en las Organizaciones - GISTICspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-16T23:52:57Zspa
dc.date.available2020-06-16T23:52:57Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-04-10spa
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research is to propose an evaluation model for Inter-Organization Information Systems (IOS) within the so-called Information Systems Success theory. Within the framework of Multimethodology, a series of techniques are developed to make this proposal. Based on a systematic review of the literature, a set of 28 documents that present models of evaluation of Intra and Interorganizational Information Systems is obtained. In order to establish a preliminary version of the IOS success evaluation model, these models are analyzed and coded in the light of the content analysis. Through this method, the dimensions, characteristics and relationships of the model are proposed. Subsequently, this initial proposal is evaluated through the criteria of experts based on the Delphi method, concluding with some adjustments and reaching the final version of the model consisting of 8 dimensions, their relationships, and 48 characteristics.spa
dc.description.abstractLa presente investigación tiene como objetivo proponer un modelo de evaluación de Sistemas Inteorganizacionales de Información (IOS) dentro de la denominada teoría del Éxito de Sistemas de Información. En el marco de la Multimetodología, se desarrolla una serie de técnicas para realizar dicha propuesta. Con base en una revisión sistemática de la literatura, se obtiene un conjunto de 28 documentos que presentan modelos de evaluación de Sistemas de Información Intra e Interorganizacionales. Con el fin de establecer una versión preliminar del modelo de evaluación del éxito de IOS, estos modelos son analizados y codificados a la luz del análisis de contenido. A través de este método, se proponen las dimensiones, características y relaciones del modelo. Posteriormente, esta propuesta incial es evaluada a través del criterio de expertos con base en el método Delphi, concluyendo con algunos ajustes y llegando a la versión final del modelo conformado por 8 dimensiones, sus relaciones, y 48 características.spa
dc.description.additionalMagíster en Administración. Línea de Investigación: Sistemas de Información Gerencialspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent203spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationBeltrán-Molina, M.A (2020). Modelo de evaluación de Sistemas Interorganizacionales de Información. Tesis de Maestría en Administración. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotáspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77664
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Públicaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administraciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAbela, J. A. (1998). Las técnicas de Análisis de Contenido: Una revisión actualizada. Hispania, 43(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.2307/334486spa
dc.relation.referencesAbia, M., & Brown, I. (2015). A Polymorphic Model of Information Systems Success: An Outcome of a Literature-Based Grounded Theory Analysis. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 28-30-Sept. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815782.2815814spa
dc.relation.referencesAllen, D. K., Colligan, D., Finnie, A., & Kern, T. (2000). Trust, power and interorganizational information systems: The case of the electronic trading community TransLease. Information Systems Journal, 10(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00078.xspa
dc.relation.referencesAlter, S. (2008). Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(January), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.37spa
dc.relation.referencesAndranovich, G. (1995). Developing community participation and consensus : the delphi technique. Los Angeles.spa
dc.relation.referencesAngeles, R., Nath, R., & Hendon, D. W. (1998). An empirical investigation of the level of electronic data interchange (EDI) implementation and its ability to predict EDI system success measures and EDI implementation factors. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28(9), 773–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039810248163spa
dc.relation.referencesBaile, S. (2003). L´évaluation du succés de I´EDI dans les PME: un modéle intégrateur. 297–328.spa
dc.relation.referencesBakos, Y. (1991). Information Links and Electronic Marketplaces: The Role of Interorganizational Information Systems in Vertical Markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(2), 31–52. https://doi.org/Articlespa
dc.relation.referencesBallejos, L. C., Gonnet, S. M., Montagna, J. M., & Ingar, C. (2008). A Stakeholder Model for Interorganizational Information Systems.pdf. 73–87.spa
dc.relation.referencesBardin, laurende. (1996). El Análisis de Contenido.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrett, S., & Konsynski, B. (1982). Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems. MIS Quarterly, 6, 93. https://doi.org/10.2307/248993spa
dc.relation.referencesBlasco Mira, J., López Padrón, A., & Mengual Andrés, S. (2010). Validación mediante el método Delphi de un cuestionario para conocer las experiencias e interés hacia las actividades acuáticas con especial atención al Winsurf. Ágora Para La Educación Física Y El Deporte, 12(2005), 75–96.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrinkhoff, A., Özer, Ö., & Sargut, G. (2015). All you need is trust? An examination of inter-organizational supply chain projects. Production and Operations Management, 24(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12234spa
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, J. A. (2000). Information System? Which One Do You Mean? (September 1999), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35500-9_22spa
dc.relation.referencesChae, B., Yen, H. J. R., & Sheu, C. (2005). Information technology and supply chain collaboration: Moderating effects of existing relationships between partners. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.856570spa
dc.relation.referencesChae, H. C. (2007). IS success model and perceived IT value. Association for Information Systems - 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007: Reaching New Heights, 7, 4808–4813.spa
dc.relation.referencesChatterjee, D., & Ravichandran, T. (2004). Inter-Organizational Information Systems Research: A Critical Review and an Integrative Framework. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 00(C), 1–10.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y. H., & Wu, J. J. (2011). Factors influencing inter-organizational information integration in networked environment. Proceedings - 4th International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing, U-Media 2011, (1992), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/U-MEDIA.2011.36spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y. H., Wu, J. J., Angeles, R., Nath, R., Hendon, D. W., Farhoomand, A. F., … O’Keefe, R. M. (2010). A framework for identifying the factors affecting on IOS development based on system approach. Information Systems Journal, 18(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2012-0070spa
dc.relation.referencesChoe, J. min. (2008). Inter-organizational relationships and the flow of information through value chains. Information and Management, 45(7), 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.006spa
dc.relation.referencesClemons, E. K. (1989). MAC - Philadelphia National Bank’s strategic venture in shared ATM networks. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 4(1), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1989.48124spa
dc.relation.referencesClemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1993). Limits to interfírm coordination through information technology: Results of a field study in consumer packaged goods distribution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11517991spa
dc.relation.referencesCresswell, A. M., Thompson, F., Zhang, J., & Pardo, T. A. (2006). Knowledge sharing in cross-boundary information system development in the public sector. Information Technology and Management, 7(4), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-006-0278-6spa
dc.relation.referencesCristina, S., Erazo, R., Castro, A. A., & Achicanoy, H. A. (2016). Inversión en Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones y su relación con en el direccionamiento estratégico de las PYMES de Santiago de Cali - Colombia. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17013/risti.18.1spa
dc.relation.referencesde Liaño, B. G. G., & Pascual-Ezama, D. (2012). The delphi method as a technique to study validity of content. Anales de Psicologia, 28(3), 1011–1020. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.28.3.156211spa
dc.relation.referencesDeLone, W., McLean, E., & Petter, S. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, B. (2016). SI-De una disciplina emergente a una disciplina consolidada Beatriz Díaz Pinzón.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrury, D. H., & Farhoomand, A. F. (1998). A hierarchical structural model of information systems success. Infor, 36(1–2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1998.11732341spa
dc.relation.referencesElbert, R., Pontow, H., & Benlian, A. (2016). The role of inter-organizational information systems in maritime transport chains. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0216-3spa
dc.relation.referencesEslava Zapata, R., Cuadrado Ebrero, A., & García Jara, E. (2010). Evaluación de la satisfacción de las necesidades de información de los usuarios contables con el análisis DELPHI. Visión Gerencial, (2), 313–331spa
dc.relation.referencesFarhoomand, A. F., & Drury, D. H. (1996). Factors influencing electronic data interchange success. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 27(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/234611.234615spa
dc.relation.referencesFink, A. (2010). Conducting Research Literature Reviews. Los Angeles.spa
dc.relation.referencesForo Económico Mundial. (2016). The Global Information Technology Report. The Global Information Technology Report 2016 Innovating in the Digital Economy. In Lanthanides Series Determination by Various Analytical Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804704-0.00010-4spa
dc.relation.referencesFu, H. P., Chang Prof, T. H., Ku, C. Y., Chang, T. S., & Huang, C. H. (2014). The critical success factors affecting the adoption of inter-organization systems by SMEs. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 29(5), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2012-0070spa
dc.relation.referencesGable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing Information System Success : The IS-Impact Measurement Model * Re-conceptualizing Information System Success : The IS-Impact Measurement Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 377–408.spa
dc.relation.referencesHartono, E., Li, X., Na, K. S., & Simpson, J. T. (2010). The role of the quality of shared information in interorganizational systems use. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.007spa
dc.relation.referencesHill, C. A., Zhang, G. P., & Scudder, G. D. (2009). An empirical investigation of EDI usage and performance improvement in food supply chains. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.922640spa
dc.relation.referencesIbbott, C. J., & O’Keefe, R. M. (2004). Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system. Information Systems Journal, 14(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00167.xspa
dc.relation.referencesIves, B., & Olson, M. (1984). User Involvement and MIS Success : A Review of Research Author ( s ): Blake Ives and Margrethe H . Olson Published by : INFORMS Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631374 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : You may. Management Science, 30(5), 586–603.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnston, H. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1988). Creating Competitive Advantage With Interorganizational Information Systems. 12(2), 153–165.spa
dc.relation.referencesJrad, R. B. N., & Sundaram, D. (2016). Challenges of inter-organizational information and middleware system projects: Agility, complexity, success, and failure. IISA 2015 - 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2015.7387960spa
dc.relation.referencesJrad, R. B. N., & Sundaram, D. (2017). Inter-organizational middleware system implementations: Dos and donts of business integration. Proceedings - 2016 16th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT 2016, 2016 6th International Symposium on Cloud and Service Computing, IEEE SC2 2016 and 2016 International Symposium on Security and Privacy in Social Netwo, 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2016.85spa
dc.relation.referencesJun, M., Cai, S., & Peterson, R. T. (2000). EDI use and participation models: From the inter-organizational relationship perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(9), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570010358366spa
dc.relation.referencesKiteley, C., & Stogdon, R. (2014). Literature Reviews in Social Work.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrathu, W., Engel, R., Pichler, C., Zapletal, M., & Werthner, H. (2013). Identifying inter-organizational key performance indicators from EDIFACT messages. Proceedings - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics, IEEE CBI 2013, 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2013.46spa
dc.relation.referencesKrathu, W., Pichler, C., Xiao, G., Werthner, H., Neidhardt, J., Zapletal, M., & Huemer, C. (2015). Inter-organizational success factors: a cause and effect model. In Information Systems and e-Business Management (Vol. 13). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-014-0258-zspa
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (1980). Metodología de análisis de contenido: Teoría y práctica.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. In Education (Vol. 79). https://doi.org/10.2307/2288384spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, K., & van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279. https://doi.org/10.2307/249657spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, R. L., & Crook, C. W. (1999). A multi-disciplinary framework for the management of interorganizational systems. ACM SIGMIS Database, 30(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/342251.342258spa
dc.relation.referencesLand, F. (1985). Is an Information Theory Enough? The Computer Journal, 28(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, G., Lin, H., & Pai, J. (2005). Influence of environmental and organizational factors on the success of internet‐based interorganizational systems planning. Internet Research, 15(5), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510629466spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, S. W., Yoon, J., & Pak, J. (2009). An analytical review of usage of success measures of IS/IT in Korean research practice: Review of articles in Korean Journal of MIS research from 1998 to 2007. 4th International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, COINFO 2009, 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/COINFO.2009.29spa
dc.relation.referencesLeitner, M., & Rinderle-Ma, S. (2014). A systematic review on security in Process-Aware Information Systems - Constitution, challenges, and future directions. Information and Software Technology, 56(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.12.004spa
dc.relation.referencesLiang, Y. H. (2013). Performance Management for Inter-organization Information Systems Performance : Using the Balanced Scorecard and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. (1980), 1377–1381.spa
dc.relation.referencesLu, X. H., Huang, L. H., & Heng, M. S. H. (2006). Critical success factors of inter-organizational information systems - A case study of Cisco and Xiao Tong in China. Information and Management, 43(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.06.007spa
dc.relation.referencesLyytinen, K., & Damsgaard, J. (2011). Inter-organizational information systems adoption-a configuration analysis approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.71spa
dc.relation.referencesMäkipää, M. (2006). Inter-organizational information systems in cooperative inter-organizational relationships: Study of the factors influencing to success. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 226, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39229-5_7spa
dc.relation.referencesMalhotra, Arvind Gosain, S. E. S. (2005). Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Parner-enabled Market Knowledge Creation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 145–187.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcLeod, A. J., Carpenter, D. R., & Clark, J. G. (2008). Measuring Success in Interorganizational Information Systems: A Case Study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02234spa
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2spa
dc.relation.referencesMingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical Realism : Basic Concepts. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 37(3), 795–802. Retrieved from http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/20232/1/216160_300.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMohammadian, A., Hassanzadeh, K., & Akhgar, B. (2010). A Framework for Identifying the Factors Affecting on IOS Development Based on System Approach. 2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 1267–1268. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2010.52spa
dc.relation.referencesParé, G., Cameron, A. F., Poba-Nzaou, P., & Templier, M. (2013). A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Information and Management, 50(5), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.03.003spa
dc.relation.referencesPaul, R. J. (2007). Challenges to information systems: Time to change. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000681spa
dc.relation.referencesPavlou, P. A. (2002). Institutional trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: The role of electronic B2B marketplaces. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3–4), 215–243.spa
dc.relation.referencesPereira-Rama, A., Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., & Chaparro-Peláez, J. (2013). The adequacy of an inter-organizational information system model for domotics service innovation in the building sector. Direccion y Organizacion, 50, 63–73.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhuaphanthong, T., & Bui, T. (2014). How did it happen? A memetic theory of interorganizational information systems emergence and evolution. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4526–4535. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.556spa
dc.relation.referencesPitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 19(2), 173–185.spa
dc.relation.referencesReimers, K., Johnston, R. B., & Klein, S. (2014). An empirical evaluation of existing IS change theories for the case of IOIS evolution. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.7spa
dc.relation.referencesRiaño, C., & Palomino, M. (2015). Diseño y elaboración de un cuestionario acorde con el método Delphi para seleccionar laboratorios virtuales (LV). Sophia, 11(2), 129–141.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical Foundations of Empirical Research on Interorganizational Systems: Assessing Past Contributions and Guiding Future Directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518. https://doi.org/Articlespa
dc.relation.referencesSaraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S. (2007). IS application capabilities and relational value in interfirm partnerships. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0133spa
dc.relation.referencesSaraf, N., Langdon, C. S., & Gosain, S. (2014). IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.l070.0133spa
dc.relation.referencesSeddon, P. B. (1997). DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success A Respecification and Extension of the. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240spa
dc.relation.referencesSeen, M., Rouse, A. C., & Beaumont, N. (2007). Explaining and predicting information systems acceptance and success: An integrative model. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2007, (iii), 1356–1367.spa
dc.relation.referencesSkjong, R., Wentworth, B. H., Valdés, M. G., Marín, M. S., Strasser, A., Mingers, J.(2015). Realising Systems Thinking : Knowledge and Action in Management Science OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development Participatory Policy Design and Governance for a Global Age. Revista Científica Pensamiento y Gestión, 4(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.14482/pege.39.8439spa
dc.relation.referencesSon, J. Y., Narasimhan, S., Riggins, F. J., & Kim, N. (2008). Understanding the development of IOS-based trading partner relationships: A structural model with empirical validation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(1), 34–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919390701807095spa
dc.relation.referencesSugumaran, V., & Arogyaswamy, B. (2003). Measuring it performance: “Contingency” variables and value modes. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2004.11647570spa
dc.relation.referencesSuomi, R. (1992). On the concept of inter-organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8687(92)90006-Ispa
dc.relation.referencesSymons, V. J. (1991). Impacts of information systems: four perspectives. Information and Software Technology, 33(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-5849(91)90132-Uspa
dc.relation.referencesThanh D. Nguyen, Tuan M. Nguyen, and T. H. C. (2014). Information Systems Success: A Literature Review. In Future Data and Security Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12778-1spa
dc.relation.referencesThomas, P. (2006). Information systems success and technology acceptance within government organization. Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, AMCIS 2006, 7, 4404–4411.spa
dc.relation.referencesValdés, M. G., & Marín, M. S. (2013). El método Delphi para la consulta a expertos en la investigación científica. Revista Cubana de Salud Publica, 39(2), 253–267.spa
dc.relation.referencesVarela-ruiz, M., Díaz-bravo, L., & García-durán, R. (2012). Descripción y usos del método Delphi en investigaciones del área de la salud. Investigación En Educación Médica, 1(2), 90–95.spa
dc.relation.referencesZiggers, G. W., & Henseler, J. (2009). Inter-firm network capability: how it affects buyer-supplier performance. British Food Journal, 111(8), 794–810.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia generalspa
dc.subject.ddc000 - Ciencias de la computación, información y obras generales::003 - Sistemasspa
dc.subject.proposalSistemas de Informaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalInformation Systemseng
dc.subject.proposalInter-organizacional Information Systemseng
dc.subject.proposalSistemas Interorganizacionales de Informaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalInformation Systems Successeng
dc.subject.proposalÉxito de Sistemas de Informaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalInformation Systems evaluation modelseng
dc.subject.proposalModelos de evaluación de Sistemas de Información.spa
dc.subject.proposalIOSspa
dc.titleModelo de evaluación de sistemas interorganizacionales de informaciónspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1014228273.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
3.54 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.9 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: