Siento que es una mentira: Origen intuitivo de los juicios de credibilidad sobre las noticias

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorTamayo Osorio, Ricardo Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorAyala Bautista, Luis David
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6721-8416spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupPsicología Experimental y Aplicadaspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T22:14:35Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T22:14:35Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractEntender cómo las personas determinan si la información es cierta o no, es clave para enfrentar el fenómeno de la desinformación. En este proceso intervienen dos tipos de procesamiento, uno intuitivo y uno deliberado. La teoría feelings-as-information propone que los sentimientos, entendidos como experiencias fenomenológicas, son usados como señales en la formación de juicios. Así mismo, numerosas investigaciones han planteado intervenciones basadas en promover un procesamiento deliberado para mejorar la detección de noticias falsas. La presente investigación buscó determinar si promover un procesamiento deliberado elimina las influencias de los sentimientos cognitivos sobre los juicios de credibilidad. Para ello, se realizó un experimento pre-registrado con diseño factorial 2 (altos y bajos sentimientos de accesibilidad) x 2 (escribir razones que indicaran que los titulares eran verdaderos y falsos) entre sujetos donde participaron un total de 128 personas. Los resultados indican que promover un procesamiento deliberado elimina las influencias de los sentimientos de accesibilidad mas no así los efectos de primado y familiaridad. Se concluye que aun durante un procesamiento deliberado existen influencias intuitivas. Así mismo, promover pensar en razones por las que la información es falsa (y no verdadera) sería más conveniente en intervenciones a gran escala. En este mismo sentido, es importante considerar las influencias de la fluidez cognitiva sobre la credibilidad a la hora de combatir la desinformación. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how people determine whether information is true or not is key to dealing with the phenomenon of disinformation. Two types of processing are involved in this process, one intuitive and one deliberative. The feelings-as-information theory proposes that feelings, understood as phenomenological experiences, are used as clues in the formation of judgments. Likewise, numerous research studies have proposed interventions based on promoting deliberative processing to improve the detection of fake news. The present research sought to determine whether promoting deliberative processing eliminates the influences of cognitive feelings on credibility judgments. To this end, a pre- registered experiment with a 2 (high and low feelings of accessibility) x 2 (write reasons indicating that headlines were true and false) between-subjects factorial design was conducted with a total of 128 participants. The results indicate that promoting deliberative processing eliminates the influences of feelings of accessibility but not the effects of priming and familiarity. It is concluded that even during deliberative processing there are intuitive influences. Furthermore, promoting thinking about reasons why information is false (and not true) would be more convenient in large-scale interventions. In the same vein, it is important to consider the influences of cognitive fluency on credibility when combating disinformation.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Psicologíaspa
dc.description.researchareaPsicología Básica y Experimental: Cognición Implícitaspa
dc.format.extent65 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83730
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá,Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Psicologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesAsk, K., Greifeneder, R. y Reinhard, M. A. (2012). On the ease of (dis)believing: The role of accessibility experiences in credibility judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2859spa
dc.relation.referencesBasso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., Ris, M. D. y Dember, W. N. (1996). Mood and global- local visual processing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617700001193spa
dc.relation.referencesBatailler, C., Brannon, S. M., Teas, P. E. y Gawronski, B. (2021). A signal detection approach to understanding the identification of fake news. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620986135spa
dc.relation.referencesBrysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? a tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72spa
dc.relation.referencesBurkhardt, J. M. (2017). History of fake news. Library Technology Reports, 53(8), 5.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarruthers, P. (2012). An architecture for dual reasoning. En J. Evans y K. Frankish (Eds.), Two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 109–127). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0005spa
dc.relation.referencesClore, G. L. y Parrott, W. G. (1994). Cognitive feelings and metacognitive judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240108spa
dc.relation.referencesClore, G. L. (2017). The impact of affect depends on its object. En R. Davidson, A. Shackman, A. Fox y R. Lapate (Eds.), The nature of emotion: A volume of short essays addressing fundamental questions in emotion. (pp. 186–189). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesClore, G. L., Schiller, A. J. y Shaked, A. (2018). Affect and cognition: Three principles. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.010spa
dc.relation.referencesDechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J. y Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352251spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Neys, W. (2018). Bias, conflict, and fast logic: Towards a hybrid dual process future? En W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (1st ed., pp. 47–65). Routledgespa
dc.relation.referencesEwoldsen, D. R., Rhodes, N. y Fazio, R. H. (2015). The MODE model and its implications for studying the media. Media Psychology, 18(3), 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.937440spa
dc.relation.referencesFaul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. y Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146spa
dc.relation.referencesFazio, L. (2020). Pausing to consider why a headline is true or false can help reduce the sharing of false news. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-009spa
dc.relation.referencesFazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4spa
dc.relation.referencesFrederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732spa
dc.relation.referencesGawronski, B. (2021). Partisan bias in the identification of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(9), 723–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.001spa
dc.relation.referencesGilovich, T. D. y Griffin, D. W. (2010). Judgment and decision making. En S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 542–588). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001015spa
dc.relation.referencesGreifeneder, R. y Bless, H. (2017). The interplay of cognition and feelings: Fluency. Social cognition: How individuals construct social reality (2nd ed., pp. 145–164). Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreifeneder, R., Bless, H. y Pham, M. T. (2011). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? a review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310367640spa
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez-Coba, L. M., Coba-Gutiérrez, P. y Gómez-Díaz, J. A. (2020). Fake news about Covid-19: A comparative analysis of six iberoamerican countries. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 78, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS- 2020-1476spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández Cadena, F., Morales, A. L., Camiña, P., Vargas Pulido, J. D. y Espeleta, C. (2018). Impacto de las redes sociales en el proceso electoral colombiano - Elecciones de congreso y presidencia 2018. Medios de comunicación, redes sociales y democracia elecciones presidenciales y legislativas 2018 (pp. 17–35). https://moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Libro-monitoreo.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHiggins, E. T. (1998). The aboutness principle: A pervasive influence on human inference. Social Cognition, 16(1), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.173spa
dc.relation.referencesHuntsinger, J. R., Isbell, L. M. y Clore, G. L. (2014). The affective control of thought: Malleable, not fixed. Psychological Review, 121(4), 600–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037669spa
dc.relation.referencesIsen, A. M. (1970). Success, failure, attention, and reaction to others: The warm glow of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029610spa
dc.relation.referencesJacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J. y Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326spa
dc.relation.referencesKahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2182588spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3132137spa
dc.relation.referencesLapate, R. C., Rokers, B., Li, T. y Davidson, R. J. (2014). Nonconscious emotional activation colors first impressions. Psychological Science, 25(2), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613503175spa
dc.relation.referencesLoersch, C. y Keith Payne, B. (2016). Demystifying priming. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.020spa
dc.relation.referencesLutzke, L., Drummond, C., Slovic, P. y Árvai, J. (2019). Priming critical thinking: Simple interventions limit the influence of fake news about climate change on Facebook. Global Environmental Change, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101964spa
dc.relation.referencesMeteyard, L. y Davies, R. A. I. (2020). Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092spa
dc.relation.referencesNewell, B. R. y Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214spa
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, G. (2018). A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual process models. En W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (1st ed., pp. 5–27). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D. y Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2spa
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G. y Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054spa
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, G. y Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011spa
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, G. y Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007spa
dc.relation.referencesR Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R- project.org/.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Pérez, C., Ortiz Calderón, L. S. y Esquivel Coronado, J. P. (2021). Desinformación en contextos de polarización social: El paro nacional en Colombia del 21N. Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de La Comunicación, 19(38), 129–156. https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/view/3236spa
dc.relation.referencesRoozenbeek, J., Freeman, A. L. J. y van der Linden, S. (2021). How accurate are accuracy-nudge interventions? a preregistered direct replication of Pennycook et al. (2020). Psychological Science, 32(7), 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211024535spa
dc.relation.referencesRoss, R., Rand, D. G. y Pennycook, G. (2019). Beyond “fake news”: Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines. Judgment and Decision Making, 16(2), 484–504. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cgsx6spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarz, N. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_2spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarz, N. (2011). Feelings-as-Information theory. En P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, y E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (1st ed., Vol. 1). SAGE Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H. y Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarz, N. y Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well- being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarz, N. y Jalbert, M. (2020). When (fake) news feels true intuitions of truth and the acceptance and correction of misinformation. En R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffe, E. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 73–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295379-7spa
dc.relation.referencesTomita, R., Chokmeesuk, J., Loriot, C., Bu, Z. y Adan, G. (2021). Ease of retrieval experiences and judgment: Review of extant literature and meta-analysis. Manuscrito inédito. http://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0402432.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeingarten, E. y Hutchinson, J. W. (2018). Does ease mediate the ease-of-retrieval effect? a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(3), 227–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000122spa
dc.relation.referencesWinston Chang, Joe Cheng, JJ Allaire, Carson Sievert, Barret Schloerke, Yihui Xie, Jeff Allen, Jonathan McPherson, Alan Dipert y Barbara Borges (2021). shiny: Web Application Framework for R. R package version 1.7.1. https://CRAN.R- project.org/package=shinyspa
dc.relation.referencesZajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Z. (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using webpower and R (K.-H. Yuan, Ed.). Isdsa Press.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología::153 - Procesos mentales conscientes e inteligenciaspa
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología::152 - Percepción sensorial, movimiento, emociones, impulsos fisiológicosspa
dc.subject.lembProceso mental de la informaciónspa
dc.subject.lembHuman information processingeng
dc.subject.lembTeoría de la información en psicologíaspa
dc.subject.lembInformation theory in psychologyeng
dc.subject.proposalAccesibilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalFluidezspa
dc.subject.proposalFluidez Cognitivaspa
dc.subject.proposalDesinformaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalCredibilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalAccessibilityeng
dc.subject.proposalFluencyeng
dc.subject.proposalCognitive Fluencyeng
dc.subject.proposalDisinformationeng
dc.subject.proposalCredibilityeng
dc.titleSiento que es una mentira: Origen intuitivo de los juicios de credibilidad sobre las noticiasspa
dc.title.translatedI feel it's a lie: Intuitive origin of credibility judgments about newseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1233898389.2023.pdf
Tamaño:
1.2 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Psicología
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Psicología