Construcción de una nueva prueba psicofísica olfatoria de identificación para la población de Bogotá D.C. del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia, entre 2020 y 2022

dc.contributor.advisorOsorio Bernal, Luz Ángelaspa
dc.contributor.advisorFuentes Francia, Andrés Leonardospa
dc.contributor.authorMoreno González, Carlos Alfonsospa
dc.coverage.cityBogotáspa
dc.coverage.countryColombiaspa
dc.coverage.regionCundinamarcaspa
dc.coverage.temporal2020-2022
dc.coverage.tgnhttp://vocab.getty.edu/page/tgn/1000838
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T19:01:56Z
dc.date.available2023-02-07T19:01:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractLos trastornos olfatorios afectan un 25% de la población, su prevalencia aumenta con la edad. A pesar de ser comunes, tienden a ser pasados por alto en la consulta médica. Las pruebas psicofísicas disponibles son producidas, principalmente, por Estados Unidos y Europa, y su aplicación queda limitada a países que comparten su trasfondo cultural. Objetivo: desarrollar una prueba psicofísica de identificación olfatoria validada, rápida, costo-efectiva y confiable para la población colombiana entre 18 y 80 años. Materiales y métodos: Se diseñó una prueba olfatoria (POC) con 12 olores reconocibles por la población general, a partir de una encuesta con escala tipo Likert. Se aplicó en un hospital de cuarto nivel a personas con y sin alteración olfatoria para obtener valores de normalidad y cuantificar tiempo de realización. Se repitió la prueba entre 30 y 120 días a una proporción de participantes para evaluar su fiabilidad, y contra el Cross Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) para validarlo con el estándar internacional. Resultados: Los 12 olores tuvieron una tasa de reconocimiento mayor 75% y el tiempo de aplicación promedio fue de 392.82 segundos. Un valor inferior a 8 fue el corte para identificar disfunción olfatoria. La fiabilidad y correlación con el CC-SIT fueron aceptables, con un alfa de Cronbach de 0.824 e índice Kappa de Cohen de 0.85. Su sensibilidad y especificidad fueron de 87.5% y 97.5%, respectivamente. Conclusión: La POC es una herramienta útil para el diagnóstico de trastornos olfatorios en la población colombiana, comparable con el estándar internacional. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractOlfactory disorders affect 25% of the population, and their prevalence increases with age. Despite being common, they tend to be overlooked in medical consult. The available psychophysical tests are mainly produced in the United States and Europe, and their application is limited to countries that share their cultural background. Objective: to develop a validated, rapid, cost-effective and reliable psychophysical olfactory identification for the colombian population between 18 and 80 years of age. Materials and methods: an olfactory test (POC) was designed with 12 odors recognizable by the general population, based on a Likert-type scale survey. It was applied in a fourth level hospital to subjects with and without olfactory alterations to obtain normal values and quantify completion time. It was repeated between 30 to 120 days with a proportion of participants to assess reliability, and against the Cross Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) to validate with the international standard. Results: the 12 odors had a recognition rate greater than75% and the average application time was 392.82 seconds. A value lower to 8 was the cutoff to identify olfactory dysfunction. Reliability and correlation with CC-SIT were acceptable, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.824 and Cohen´s kappa coefficient of 0.85. Its sensibility and specificity were 87.5% and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusion: The POC is a useful tool for the diagnosis of olfactory disorders in colombian population, comparable to the international standard.eng
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicasspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Otorrinolaringologíaspa
dc.format.extent42 páginas sin enumerarspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83363
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Otorrinolaringologíaspa
dc.relation.indexedBiremespa
dc.relation.referencesCho SH. Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Olfactory Dysfunction. Hanyang Med Rev. 2014;34(3):107.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaska M. Human and A. In: A B, editor. Springer Handbook of Odor. 1st ed. Freising, Germany: Springer; 2017. p. 675–89.spa
dc.relation.referencesRibeiro JC, Simões J, Silva F, Silva ED, Hummel C, Hummel T, et al. Cultural adaptation of the Portuguese version of the “Sniffin’’ Sticks" smell test: Reliability, validity, and normative data.” PLoS One. 2016;11(2):1–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesYang J, Pinto JM. The Epidemiology of Olfactory Disorders. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016;4(2):130– 41.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoesveldt S, Postma EM, Boak D, Welge-Luessen A, Schöpf V, Mainland JD, et al. Anosmia-A Clinical Review. Chem Senses. 2017;42(7):513–23.spa
dc.relation.referencesSorokowska A, Sorokowski P, Hummel T. Cross-Cultural Administration of an Odor Discrimination Test. Chemosens Percept. 2014;7(2):85–90.spa
dc.relation.referencesAntsov E, Silveira-Moriyama L, Kilk S, Kadastik-Eerme L, Toomsoo T, Lees A, et al. Adapting the Sniffin’ Sticks olfactory test to diagnose Parkinson’s disease in Estonia. Park Relat Disord [Internet]. 2014;20(8):830–3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.04.012spa
dc.relation.referencesMeng X, Deng Y, Dai Z, Meng Z. COVID-19 and anosmia: A review based on up-to-date knowledge. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(January):1–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrämerson A, Johansson L, Ek L, Nordin S, Bende M. Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction: The Skövde Population-Based Study. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(4):733–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Murphy C, Huang GH, Klein BEK, Klein R, et al. Olfactory impairment in adults: The beaver dam experience. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:531–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchöpf V, Kollndorfer K. Clinical Assessment of Olfactory Performance - Why Patient Interviews Are Not Enough : A Report on Lessons Learned in Planning Studies With Anosmic Patients. HNO. 2015;63(7):511–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesCroy I, Nordin S, Hummel T. Olfactory Disorders and Quality of Life-An Updated Review. Chem Senses. 2014;39(3):185–94.spa
dc.relation.referencesNordin S, Brämerson A. Complaints of Olfactory Disorders: Epidemiology, Assessment and Clinical Implications. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;8(1):10–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeiberling KA, Conley DB. Aging and Olfactory and Taste Function. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004;37(6 SPEC.ISS.):1209–28.spa
dc.relation.referencesLennington JB, Yang Z, Conover JC. Neural Stem Cells and the Regulation of Adult Neurogenesis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003; 1:1–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith WM, Davidson TM, Murphy C. Toxin-Induced Chemosensory Dysfunction: A Case Series and Review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(6):578–81.spa
dc.relation.referencesAjmani GS, Suh HH, Wroblewski KE, Pinto JM. Smoking and Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(8):1753–61.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchiffman SS. Influence of Medications on Taste and Smell. World J Otorhinolaryngol - Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2018;4(1):84–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.02.005spa
dc.relation.references. Lee DY, Lee WH, Wee JH, Kim JW. Prognosis of Postviral Olfactory Loss: Follow-up Study for Longer Than One Year. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014;28(5):419–22.spa
dc.relation.referencesGudis DA, Soler ZM. Chronic Rhinosinusitis-Related Smell Loss: Medical and Surgical Treatment Efficacy. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016;4(2):142–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesHowell J, Costanzo RM, Reiter ER. Head Trauma and Olfactory Function. World J Otorhinolaryngol - Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2018;4(1):39–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.02.001spa
dc.relation.referencesNeuland C, Bitter T, Marschner H, Gudziol H, Guntinas-Lichius O. Health-related and specific olfaction- related quality of life in patients with chronic functional anosmia or severe hyposmia. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(4):867–72.spa
dc.relation.referencesHavermans RC, Hermanns J, Jansen A. Eating Without a Nose: Olfactory Dysfunction and Sensory- Specific Satiety. Chem Senses. 2010;35(8):735–41. 24. Philpott CM, Boak D. The Impact of Olfactory Disorders in the United Kingdom. Chem Senses. 2014;39(8):711–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhilpott CM, Boak D. The Impact of Olfactory Disorders in the United Kingdom. Chem Senses. 2014;39(8):711–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesManesse C, Ferdenzi C, Sabri M, Bessy M, Rouby C, Faure F, et al. Dysosmia-Associated Changes in Eating Behavior. Chemosens Percept. 2017;10(4):104–13.spa
dc.relation.referencesAschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, et al. The Influence of Olfactory Loss on Dietary Behaviors. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(1):135–44.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoffman HJ, Rawal S, Li CM, Duffy VB. New Chemosensory Component In The U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): First-Year Results For Measured Olfactory Dysfunction. Rev Endocr Metab Disord [Internet]. 2016;17(2):221–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11154-016-9364-1spa
dc.relation.referencesKeller A, Malaspina D. Hidden Consequences of Olfactory Dysfunction: A Patient Report Series. BMC Ear, Nose Throat Disord. 2013;13(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesPence TS, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM. Risk Factors For Hazardous Events In Olfactory- Impaired Patients. JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(10):951–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesPinto JM, Wroblewski KE, Kern DW, Schumm LP, McClintock MK. Olfactory Dysfunction Predicts 5-Year Mortality In Older Adults. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):1–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesNordin S, Hedén Blomqvist E, Olsson P, Stjårne P, Ehnhage A. Effects of Smell Loss on Daily Life and Adopted Coping Strategies in Patients With Nasal Polyposis with Asthma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(8):826–32.spa
dc.relation.referencesCroy I, Bojanowski V, Hummel T. Men Without a Sense of Smell Exhibit a Strongly Reduced Number of Sexual Relationships, Women Exhibit Reduced Partnership Security - A Reanalysis of Previously Published Data. Biol Psychol [Internet]. 2013;92(2):292–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.008spa
dc.relation.referencesHaxel BR, Nisius A, Fruth K, Mann WJ, Muttray A. Deficits in Medical Counseling in Olfactory Dysfunction. HNO. 2012;60(5):432–8.spa
dc.relation.referencesJung YG, Lee JS, Park GC. Does Post-Infectious Olfactory Loss Affect Mood More Severely Than Chronic Sinusitis With Olfactory Loss? Laryngoscope. 2014;124(11):2456–60.spa
dc.relation.referencesKollndorfer K, Reichert JL, Brückler B, Hinterleitner V, Schöpf V. Self-Esteem as an Important Factor in Quality of Life and Depressive Symptoms in Anosmia: A Pilot Study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(6):1229–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesKohli P, Soler ZM, Nguyen SA, Muus JS, Schlosser RJ. The Association Between Olfaction and Depression: A Systematic Review. Chem Senses. 2016;41(6):479–86.spa
dc.relation.referencesWerner S, Nies E. Olfactory Dysfunction Revisited: A Reappraisal of Work-Related Olfactory Dysfunction Caused by Chemicals. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2018;13(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesRawal S, Hoffman HJ, Chapo AK, Duffy VB. Sensitivity and Specificity of Self-Reported Olfactory Function in a Home-Based Study of Independent-Living, Healthy Older Women. Chemosens Percept. 2014;7(3–4):108–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoty RL. Office Procedures For Quantitative Assessment of Olfactory Function. Am J Rhinol. 2007;21(4):460–73.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoty RL. Olfactory Dysfunction and Its Measurement in the Clinic. World J Otorhinolaryngol Neck Surg [Internet]. 2015;1(1):28–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2015.09.007spa
dc.relation.referencesCampabadal A, Segura B, Junque C, Serradell M, Abos A, Uribe C, et al. Comparing The Accuracy And Neuroanatomical Correlates Of The UPSIT-40 And The Sniffin’ Sticks Test In REM Sleep Behavior Disorder. Park Relat Disord [Internet]. 2019;65(May):197–202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.06.013spa
dc.relation.referencesHugh SC, Siu J, Hummel T, Forte V, Campisi P, Papsin BC, et al. Olfactory Testing in Children Using Objective Tools: Comparison of Sniffin’ Sticks and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2015;44(March):1–5.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmell Identification Test UPSIT - MediSense | Smelltest.eu [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 27]. Available from: https://smelltest.eu/en/product/smell-identification-test-2/spa
dc.relation.referencesYu CY, Wu RM. Application Of The University Of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (Traditional Chinese Version) for Detecting Olfactory Deficits In Early Parkinson’s Disease In a Taiwanese Cohort. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(2):175–80.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW. Development of the 12-Item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC- SIT). Laryngoscope. 1996;106(March):353–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl Rassi E, Mace JC, Steele TO, Alt JA, Soler ZM, Fu R, et al. Sensitivity Analysis And Diagnostic Accuracy Of The Brief Smell Identification Test In Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(3):287–92.spa
dc.relation.references. Wolfensberger M, Schnieper I, Welge-Lüssen A. Sniffin’Sticks®: A New Olfactory Test Battery. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120(2):303–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesHinz A, Luck T, Riedel-Heller SG, Herzberg PY, Rolffs C, Wirkner K, et al. Olfactory Dysfunction: Properties of the Sniffin’ Sticks Screening 12 Test and Associations With Quality of Life. Eur Arch Oto- Rhino-Laryngology [Internet]. 2019;276(2):389–95. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405- 018-5210-2spa
dc.relation.referencesSniffin’ Sticks Identification Test 16, blue - MediSense | Smelltest.eu [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 27]. Available from: https://smelltest.eu/en/product/burghart-sniffin-sticks-identification-test-16-blue/spa
dc.relation.referencesOleszkiewicz A, Taut M, Sorokowska A, Radwan A, Kamel R, Hummel T. Development of the Arabic Version Of The “Sniffin’ Sticks” Odor Identification Test. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2016;273(5):1179–84.spa
dc.relation.referencesHedner M, Larsson M, Arnold N, Zucco GM, Hummel T. Cognitive Factors in Odor Detection, Odor Discrimination, and Odor Identification Tasks. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32(10):1062–7.spa
dc.relation.referencesFeng, Guo; Zhuang, Yuan; Yao; Fangshu; Ye, Yuting; Wan QWZ. Development of the Chinese Smell Identification Test. Chem Senses. 2019;44(3):185–95.spa
dc.relation.referencesEibenstein A, Fioretti AB, Lena C, Rosati N, Ottaviano I, Fusetti M. Olfactory Screening Test: Experience In 102 Italian Subjects. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005;25(1):18–22.spa
dc.relation.referencesKonstantinidis I, Printza A, Genetzaki S, Mamali K, Kekes G, Constantinidis J. Cultural Adaptation Of An Olfactory Identification Test: The Greek Version Of Sniffin’ Sticks. Rhinology. 2008;46(4):292–6.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiklassen AS, Ovesen T, Fernandes H, Fjaeldstad AW. Danish Validation of Sniffin’ Sticks Olfactory Test for Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(8):1759–66.spa
dc.relation.referencesPinkhardt EH, Liu H, Ma D, Chen J, Pachollek A, Kunz MS, et al. Olfactory Screening of Parkinson’s Disease Patients and Healthy Subjects in China and Germany: A Study of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Sniffin’ Sticks 12-Identification Test. PLoS One [Internet]. 2019;14(11):1–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224331spa
dc.relation.referencesAltundag A, Tekeli H, Salihoglu M, Cayonu M, Yasar H, Kendirli MT, et al. Cross-Culturally Modified University Of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test For A Turkish Population. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015;29(5):138–41.spa
dc.relation.referencesSu, B., Wu, D. and Wei, Y. (2021) “Development of Chinese odor identification test,” Annals of Translational Medicine, 9(6), pp. 499–499. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-913.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaito S, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Takashima Y, Gotow N, Naito N, Nozawa T, et al. Development Of A Smell Identification Test Using A Novel Stick-Type Odor Presentation Kit. Chem Senses. 2006;31(4):379–91.spa
dc.relation.referencesGupta N, Singh PP, Goyal A, Bhatia D. Assessment of Olfaction Using the “I-Smell” Test in an Indian Population: A Pilot Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(1):6–11.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::617 - Cirugía, medicina regional, odontología, oftalmología, otología, audiologíaspa
dc.subject.decsTrastornos del Olfato/diagnósticospa
dc.subject.decsOlfaction Disorders/diagnosiseng
dc.subject.decsAnosmiaspa
dc.subject.decsAnosmiaeng
dc.subject.decsTécnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticosspa
dc.subject.decsDiagnostic Techniques and Procedureseng
dc.subject.proposalTrastornos olfatoriosspa
dc.subject.proposalPrueba diagnósticaspa
dc.subject.proposalIdentificación olfatoriaspa
dc.subject.proposalVersión colombianaspa
dc.subject.proposalCC-SITspa
dc.subject.proposalOlfactory disorderseng
dc.subject.proposalDiagnostic testeng
dc.subject.proposalOlfactory identificationeng
dc.subject.proposalColombian versioneng
dc.subject.proposalCC-SITeng
dc.titleConstrucción de una nueva prueba psicofísica olfatoria de identificación para la población de Bogotá D.C. del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia, entre 2020 y 2022spa
dc.title.translatedDevelopment of a new smell identification psychophysical olfactory test for Bogotá D.C. population at National University Hospital of Colombia between 2020 and 2022eng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médicaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestrosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1098776117.2022.pdf
Tamaño:
523.31 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Especialidad en Otorrinolaringología

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: