Estimaciones de aversión al riesgo: comparación de una medida de autopercepción y una experimental bajo utilidad esperada y teoría de prospectos

dc.contributor.advisorGarcía Molina, Mariospa
dc.contributor.authorGómez Cepeda, Zulma Eugeniaspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-22T18:34:05Z
dc.date.available2024-01-22T18:34:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-01
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramasspa
dc.description.abstractCuando las personas toman decisiones bajo riesgo económico, lo hacen con base en la información que reciben, la cual es analizada por el individuo a través de procesos tantocognitivos como emocionales que le permiten llegar a la decisión, y reflejan un comportamiento mostrando si la persona es amante, neutral o aversa al riesgo. Analizamos y comparamos los resultados de dos métodos distintos para medir aversión al riesgo en el dominio de las ganancias, aplicando en primer lugar una autoevaluación de la actitud general de aversión al riesgo similar a la aplicada por Dohmen et al. (2011) y, en segundo lugar, un juego experimental de inversión con incentivos reales basado en el modelo de las 15 preguntas de Wakker (2010). Tal como se viene mostrando en la literatura reciente, no existe correlación estadísticamente significativa entre la medida de autopercepción y la medida económica de aversión al riesgo lo cual se mantiene bajo los supuestos de utilidad esperada y teoría de prospectos, sin embargo, aunque se encontró que los distintos métodos usados para la estimación económica si se encuentran significativamente correlacionados, el método de estimación a través de minimización de distancia euclidiana es el único que muestra el signo esperado en la prueba de correlación con la medida de autopercepción. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractWhen people make decisions under economic risk, they do so based on the information they receive, which is analyzed by the individual through both cognitive and emotional processes that allow him/her to reach the decision and reflect a behavior showing whether the person is risk-loving, risk-neutral, or risk-averse. We analyze and compare the results of two different methods to measure risk aversion in the earnings domain, applying first a self-assessment of general risk aversion attitude like the one applied by Dohmen et al. (2011) and, second, an experimental investment game with real incentives based on the 15-question model of Wakker (2010). As has been shown in recent literature, there is no statistically significant correlation between the self-perception measure and the economic measure of risk aversion which holds under the assumptions of expected utility and prospect theory, however, although it was found that the different methods used for economic estimation are significantly correlated, the estimation method through Euclidean distance minimization is the only one that shows the expected sign in the correlation test with the self-perception measure.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.format.extentix, 40 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85397
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.relation.referencesArrow, K. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. Helsinki, Yrjö Jahnsonn Foundation.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlais, A.-R., & Weber, E. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1),, 33–47spa
dc.relation.referencesBlavatskyy, P. (2021). A Simple Non-parametric Method for Eliciting Prospect Theory’s Value Function and Measuring Loss Aversion under Risk and Ambiguity. Theory and Decision, 91(3),, 403–416.spa
dc.relation.referencesBonsang, E., & Dohmen, T. (2015). Risk attitude and cognitive aging. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,112–126.spa
dc.relation.referencesCampos-Vazquez, R., & Cuilty, E. (2014). The Role of Emotions on Risk Aversion: A Prospect Theory Experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 50,1–9.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharness, G. and Viceisza, A. (2016). Three risk-elicitation methods in the field: evidence from rural Senegal. Review of Behavioral Economics, 3, 145-171.spa
dc.relation.referencesCzerwonka, M. (2019). Cultural, cognitive and personality traits in risk-taking behaviour: evidence from Poland and the United States of America. . Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 32., 894-908.spa
dc.relation.referencesDing, X., Hartog, J., & Sun, Y. (2010). Can We Measure Individual Risk Attitudes in a Survey? Discussion Paper No. 4807.spa
dc.relation.referencesDohmen, T., Falk, A., Golsteyn, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2017). Risk attitudes across the life course. The Economic Journal, 127(605),, F95–F116.spa
dc.relation.referencesDohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. (2005). Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence from a Large, Representative, Experimentally-Validated Survey, No 511,. Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesDohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. (2011). Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants, and Behavioral Consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, Volume 9, Issue 3,522–550.spa
dc.relation.referencesGiuseppe, A., Georgantzís, N., Rotondi, V., & Vigani, D. (2018). Lottery- and survey- based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task. Theory Dec., 341-372.spa
dc.relation.referencesH., A. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. . Helsinki, Yrjö Jahnsonn Foundation.spa
dc.relation.referencesHardeweg, B., Menkhoff, L., and Waibel, H. (2013). Experimentally validated survey evidence on individual risk attitudes in rural Thailand. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61, 859-888.spa
dc.relation.referencesHe, P., M. Veronesi, and S. Engel (2017), “Consistency of Risk Preference Measures: An Artefactual Field Experiment from Rural China.” Journal of Development Studiesspa
dc.relation.referencesHolt, C., & Laury, S. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. SSRN Electronic Journal. 92.spa
dc.relation.referencesJarrow, R., & Li, S. (2021). Concavity, Stochastic Utility, and Risk Aversion. Finance and Stochastics, 25(2),, 311–330.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.spa
dc.relation.referencesLönnqvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., Walkowitz, G., and Wichardt, P. (2015). Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 119, 254-266.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcGhee, R., Ehrler, D., Buckhalt, J., & Phillips, C. (2012). The Relation between Five- Factor Personality Traits and Risk-Taking Behavior in Preadolescents. Psychology, 03(08), 558–561.spa
dc.relation.referencesNicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O'Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and Domain-Specific Risk Taking. Journal of Risk Research. 8.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Donoghue, T., & Somerville, J. (2018). Modeling Risk Aversion in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2),, 91–113.spa
dc.relation.referencesOehler, A., & Wedlich, F. (2018). The relationship of extraversion and neuroticism with risk attitude, risk perception, and return expectations. Journal of Neuroscience,Psychology, and Economics, 11(2), 63–92.spa
dc.relation.referencesPennings, J. M. and Smidts, A. (2000). Assessing the construct validity of risk attitude. Management Science, 46, 1337-1348.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuiggin, J. (1992). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 323-343.spa
dc.relation.referencesRabin, M. (2000). Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem. Econometrica, 68(5),, 1281–1292.spa
dc.relation.referencesReynaud, A. and Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, 73, 203-221.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchechter, L. (2007). Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Exercise. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35(1), 67–76.spa
dc.relation.referencesSemenov, A. (2006). The Measure of Relative Risk Aversion in the Consumption CAPM with Power Utility. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 2(2), 111–114.spa
dc.relation.referencesTreibich., C. (2015). Are Survey Risk Aversion Measurements Adequate in a Low Income Context?.spa
dc.relation.referencesVieider, F. M., Lefebvre, M., Bouchouicha, R., Chmura, T., Hakimov, R., Krawczyk, M., and Martinsson, P. (2015). Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: Evidence from 30 countries. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13, 421-452.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::332 - Economía financieraspa
dc.subject.jelD81- Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
dc.subject.proposalAversión al riesgospa
dc.subject.proposalUtilidad esperadaspa
dc.subject.proposalTeoria de prospectosspa
dc.subject.proposalToma de decisiones bajo riesgo e incertidumbrespa
dc.subject.proposalRisk aversioneng
dc.subject.proposalExpected utilityeng
dc.subject.proposalProspect Theoryeng
dc.subject.proposalDecision making under risk and uncertaintyeng
dc.subject.unescoGananciaspa
dc.subject.unescoProfitseng
dc.subject.unescoToma de decisionesspa
dc.subject.unescoDecision makingeng
dc.subject.unescoInversiónspa
dc.subject.unescoInvestmenteng
dc.titleEstimaciones de aversión al riesgo: comparación de una medida de autopercepción y una experimental bajo utilidad esperada y teoría de prospectosspa
dc.title.translatedEstimates of risk aversion: comparing a self-perceived and an experimental measure under expected utility and prospect theoryeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1053610089.2023.pdf
Tamaño:
1.17 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias Económicas

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: