Relación entre la desigualdad social y la biodiversidad en la ciudad de Bogotá

dc.contributor.advisorArmenteras Pascual, Dolors
dc.contributor.authorMutis Rangel, Rodrigo
dc.coverage.cityBogotá
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.coverage.regionCundinamarca
dc.coverage.tgnhttp://vocab.getty.edu/page/tgn/1000838
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-20T17:58:43Z
dc.date.available2026-02-20T17:58:43Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-22
dc.descriptionilustraciones a color, diagramas, fotografías, mapas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractEste estudio analiza la relación entre la desigualdad socioeconómica y la distribución de la biodiversidad de aves en Bogotá, Colombia, con un enfoque en el efecto de lujo, que sugiere que las áreas más ricas tienden a albergar una mayor diversidad de especies. Utilizando datos de la plataforma eBird y variables socioeconómicas como el estrato social y el valor del suelo, se aplicaron modelos de regresión espacial (SAR y SEM) y regresión logística ordenada para evaluar cómo la proximidad geográfica y el nivel socioeconómico influyen en la presencia de aves. Los resultados mostraron que los estratos socioeconómicos más altos (4, 5 y 6), que representan el 26.4% del área urbana, concentraron el 52.3% de las ocurrencias de aves, mientras que los estratos más bajos (1, 2 y 3), que ocupan el 73.6% del área, albergaron solo el 47.7%. Las especies generalistas, como la mirla (Turdus fuscater), mostraron una distribución homogénea, mientras que las especialistas, como el cucarachero pechigrís (Henicorhina leucophrys), estuvieron asociadas a estratos más altos. Los modelos espaciales revelaron autocorrelación significativa (ρ y λ con p < 0.05) para la mayoría de las especies, aunque algunas migratorias y acuáticas no mostraron relación con el valor del suelo. Estos hallazgos respaldan la hipótesis del efecto de lujo y subrayan la importancia de la segregación socioeconómica en la distribución de la biodiversidad urbana. El estudio sugiere que la planificación urbana debe considerar la equidad en el acceso a áreas verdes y la conservación de hábitats críticos para promover la justicia ambiental en Bogotá. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the relationship between socioeconomic inequality and the distribution of bird biodiversity in Bogotá, Colombia, focusing on the luxury effect, which posits that wealthier areas tend to host greater species diversity. Using data from the eBird platform and socioeconomic variables such as social stratum and land value, spatial regression models (SAR and SEM) and ordered logistic regression were applied to assess how geographic proximity and socioeconomic level influence bird presence. Results showed that higher socioeconomic strata (4, 5, and 6), representing 26.4% of the urban area, accounted for 52.3% of bird occurrences, while lower strata (1, 2, and 3), covering 73.6% of the area, hosted only 47.7%. Generalist species, such as the Great Thrush (Turdus fuscater), were evenly distributed, while specialist species, like the Gray-breasted Wood-Wren (Henicorhina leucophrys), were associated with higher strata. Spatial models revealed significant autocorrelation (ρ and λ with p < 0.05) for most species, though some migratory and aquatic birds showed no relationship with land value. These findings support the luxury effect hypothesis and highlight the role of socioeconomic segregation in urban biodiversity distribution. The study suggests that urban planning should promote equitable access to green spaces and conserve critical habitats to advance environmental justice in Bogotá.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Geografía
dc.description.researchareaBiogeografía urbana
dc.description.researchareaEcología urbana
dc.format.extent194 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89619
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Geografíaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanas
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Geografía
dc.relation.referencesAbramo, P. (2012). La ciudad com-fusa: mercado y producción de la estructura urbana en las grandes metrópolis latinoamericanas. EURE (Santiago), 38(114), 35-69.
dc.relation.referencesAbramo, P. (2011). La producción de las ciudades latinoamericanas: mercado inmobiliario y estructura urbana (Vol. 9). Quito: Organización Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Centros Históricos.
dc.relation.referencesAgresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.referencesAckley JW, Wu J, Angilletta Jr MJ, Myint SW, Sullivan B. (2015). Rich lizards: how affluence and land cover influence the diversity and abundance of desert reptiles persisting in an urban landscape. Biol. Conserv. 182, 87 – 92. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.009.
dc.relation.referencesAnselin, L. (2002). Under the hood issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics, 27(3), 247-267.
dc.relation.referencesAnselin, L. (2013). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media.
dc.relation.referencesAntía, S. C. A. (2019). Segregación socio-espacial en las ciudades latinoamericanas. CLACSO.
dc.relation.referencesBatáry, P., Kurucz, K., Suarez-Rubio, M., & Chamberlain, D. E. (2018). Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 24(3), 1046–1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13964
dc.relation.referencesBibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A., & Mustoe, S. H. (2000). Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press.
dc.relation.referencesBird, T. J., Bates, A. E., Lefcheck, J. S., Hill, N. A., Thomson, R. J., Edgar, G. J., ... & Frusher, S. (2014). Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biological Conservation, 173, 144-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037
dc.relation.referencesBivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. J., Gómez-Rubio, V., & Pebesma, E. J. (2013). Applied spatial data analysis with R (Vol. 2). Springer.
dc.relation.referencesBlair, R. B. (2001). Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States: Is urbanization creating a homogeneous fauna? In J. L. Lockwood & M. L. McKinney (Eds.), Biotic Homogenization (pp. 33–56). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Reyes, D. (2018). Socioeconomic stratification and stereotyping: lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia. International Review of Economics, 65, 77-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-017-0285-4
dc.relation.referencesBonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
dc.relation.referencesButcher, G. S., Niven, D. K., & Sauer, J. R. (2005). Using Christmas Bird Count data to assess population dynamics and trends of waterbirds. American Birds, 59(105th Christmas Bird), 23-25.
dc.relation.referencesCalderón, A. (2016). Territorios simultáneos: formas de territorialización de la Sabana de Bogotá (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)).
dc.relation.referencesCamargo Sierra, A. P., & Hurtado Tarazona, A. (2013). Urbanización informal en Bogotá: agentes y lógicas de producción del espacio urbano. Revista invi, 28(78), 77-107.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582013000200003
dc.relation.referencesCastro-Vargas, Fernando. Cruz-Mendivelso, Yerson. Ortega-Chamorro. Darwin, Palacino-Rodríguez, Fredy (2020). Birds from northeastern Bogotá Savannah, Cundinamarca, Colombia. Check List 16 (5): 1375–1391.DOI: https://doi.org/10.15560/16.5.1375.
dc.relation.referencesCarrizosa, J. (2014). Colombia Compleja. Jardín Botánico de Bogotá
dc.relation.referencesCBC, A. C. B. C. Combining Data from the Christmas Bird Count and the Breeding Bird Survey to Determine the Continental Status and Trends of North America Birds.
dc.relation.referencesChace, J. F., & Walsh, J. J. (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(1), 46–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007
dc.relation.referencesChamberlain, D. E., Henry, D. A., Reynolds, C., Caprio, E., & Amar, A. (2019). The relationship between wealth and biodiversity: A test of the Luxury Effect on bird species richness in the developing world. Global Change Biology, 25(9), 3045–3055. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14682
dc.relation.referencesChamberlain, D. E., Kibuule, M., Skeen, R., & Pomeroy, D. (2017). Trends in bird species richness, abundance and biomass along a tropical urbanisation gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 20(3), 629–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0621-6
dc.relation.referencesChamberlain, D. E., Kibuule, M., Skeen, R. Q., & Pomeroy, D. (2018). Urban bird trends in a rapidly growing tropical city. Ostrich, 89(3), 275–280.
dc.relation.referencesChamberlain, D. E., Reynolds, C., Amar, A., Henry, D. A., Caprio, E., & Batáry, P. (2020). Wealth, water and wildlife: Landscape aridity intensifies the urban luxury effect. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29(9), 1595–1605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13122
dc.relation.referencesCobos, E. P. (2014). La ciudad capitalista en el patrón neoliberal de acumulación en América Latina. Cadernos métropole, 16(31), 37-60.
dc.relation.referencesCooper, C. B. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 11. DOI: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art11/
dc.relation.referencesCortés-Dussán, G. (2020). Biodiversidad Urbana en Bogotá (Colombia). Revista TIA - Tecnología, Investigación y Academia, 8(3), 159-167. DOI: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/tia/article/view/19917/18545
dc.relation.referencesDavies, R. G., Orme, C. D. L., Olson, V., Thomas, G. H., Ross, S. G., Ding, T. S., ... & Gaston, K. J. (2006). Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1598), 2127-2133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3551
dc.relation.referencesDavis, A. Y., Belaire, J. A., Farfan, M. A., Milz, D., Sweeney, E. R., Loss, S. R., & Minor, E. S. (2012). Green infrastructure and bird diversity across an urban socioeconomic gradient. Ecosphere, 3(11), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00126.1
dc.relation.referencesDavis, M. (2006). Planeta de ciudades miseria. Ediciones Akal.
dc.relation.referencesDANE –Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (2018). Censo General 2018.
dc.relation.referencesDel Milenio, E. D. L. E. (2005). Los ecosistemas y el bienestar humano: humedales y agua. Informe de Síntesis World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., ... & Purcell, K. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/110236
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 149–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
dc.relation.referencesDouglas, I., & James, P. (2015). Urban ecology: an introduction. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108703
dc.relation.referencesDobbs, C., Escobedo, F. J., Clerici, N., de la Barrera, F., Eleuterio, A. A., MacGregor-Fors, I., ... & Hernández, H. J. (2019). Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities?. Urban ecosystems, 22, 173-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3
dc.relation.referencesDuque, I., & Silva, L. Á. (2021). Sistema urbano colombiano: evolución y cambios recientes. In F. Maturana & J. W. Montoya (Eds.), Sistemas urbanos en América Latina, el Caribe y Estados Unidos, un balance en los albores del siglo XXI. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesEcheverry-Galvis, M. A., Lozano Ramírez, P., & Amaya-Espinel, J. D. (2023). Long-term Christmas Bird Counts describe neotropical urban bird diversity. PLoS one, 18(2), e0272754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272754
dc.relation.referencesElhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometrics: From cross-sectional data to spatial panels (Vol. 479). Springer.
dc.relation.referencesElmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Olsson, P., Gaffney, O., ... & Folke, C. (2019). Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature sustainability, 2(4), 267-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
dc.relation.referencesElmqvist, T., Andersson, E., McPhearson, T., Bai, X., Bettencourt, L., Brondizio, E., ... & Van Der Leeuw, S. (2021). Urbanization in and for the Anthropocene. Npj Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00018-w
dc.relation.referencesEscobedo F, Clerici N, Staudhammer C, Corzo G (2015). Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia's public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.011
dc.relation.referencesEvans, K. L., Chamberlain, D. E., Hatchwell, B. J., Gregory, R. D., & Gaston, K. J. (2011). What makes an urban bird? Global Change Biology, 17(1), 32–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02247.x
dc.relation.referencesFay, M., & Ruggeri, C. (2005). Urban poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean: Setting the stage. In M. Fay (Ed.), The Urban Poor in Latin America. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
dc.relation.referencesFeng, X., Zeng, F., Loo, B. P., & Zhong, Y. (2024). The evolution of urban ecological resilience: An evaluation framework based on vulnerability, sensitivity and self-organization. Sustainable Cities and Society, 116, 105933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105933
dc.relation.referencesFilgueiras, B. K., Peres, C. A., Melo, F. P., Leal, I. R., & Tabarelli, M. (2021). Winner–loser species replacements in human-modified landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(6), 545-555. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.02.006
dc.relation.referencesGaston, K. J. (2003). The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGaynor, K. M., Hojnowski, C. E., Carter, N. H., & Brashares, J. S. (2018). The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science, 360(6394), 1232-1235. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar7121
dc.relation.referencesGodefroid, S., & Ricotta, C. (2018). Alien plant species do have a clear preference for different land uses within urban environments. Urban Ecosystems, 21(6), 1189–1198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0792-4
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Moreno, V. D. C., González-Gaona, O. J., Niño-Maldonado, S., Azuara-Domínguez, A., & Barrientos-Lozano, L. (2023). Las áreas verdes urbanas con vegetación mixta favorecen la riqueza y abundancia de aves en Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. Revista de Biología Tropical, 71(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v71i1.50729
dc.relation.referencesGonzález Angarita, G. P., & Escalona Orcao, A. I. (2018). El impacto de la dinámica urbana sobre los humedales de Bogotá (Colombia). Análisis, modelización y propuestas en el marco del crecimiento verde.
dc.relation.referencesGray, E. R., & van Heezik, Y. (2016). Exotic trees can sustain native birds in urban woodlands. Urban Ecosystems, 19(1), 315–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0493-1
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez López, J. A., Nieto Martínez, H. D., & Quenguan López, L. F. (2022). Modelo de estratificación como generador de segregación en Bogotá. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 32(1), 191-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v32n1.87760
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital. Johns Hopkins University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Wiley-Blackwell.
dc.relation.referencesMayorga Henao, J. M., & García García, D. M. (2019). Calidad de vida y acceso inequitativo al espacio público en Bogotá. Documents d'anàlisi geogràfica, 65(1), 0069-92.
dc.relation.referencesMayorga Henao, J. M., & Lopez, D. F. (2021). Relación entre calidad de vida y distribución del arbolado urbano en Bogotá: una perspectiva desde la justicia ambiental urbana. Revista de Direito da Cidade, 13(4), 1762-1782.
dc.relation.referencesMeza, C. A. (2008). Urbanización, conservación y ruralidad en los Cerros Orientales de Bogotá. Revista colombiana de antropología, 44(2), 439-480.
dc.relation.referencesHiggins, L. M., Pauly, G. B., Goldman, J. G., & Hood, C. (2019). Wild LA: Explore the amazing nature in and around Los Angeles. Timber Press.
dc.relation.referencesHope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W., Fagan, W. F., Redman, C. L., Grimm, N. B., ... & Kinzig, A. (2003). Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 100(15), 8788-8792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.153755710
dc.relation.referencesHosmer Jr, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.referencesHowes, C., & Reynolds, C. (2021). Absence of a Luxury Effect on bird alpha diversity in a rapidly developing African city, but surrounding landscape is key. Landscape and Urban Planning, 213, 104095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104095
dc.relation.referencesIPBES (2019): Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 1148 pages. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo González, S. (2009). Hacia una teoría de la renta del suelo urbano. Ediciones Uniandes.
dc.relation.referencesJ.L. Dickinson, J. Shirk, D. Bonter, R. Bonney, R.L. Crain, J. Martin, T. Phillips, K. Purcell (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front. Ecol. Environ., 10 pp. 291-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/110236.
dc.relation.referencesJohnston, A., Hochachka, W. M., Strimas‐Mackey, M. E., Ruiz Gutierrez, V., Robinson, O. J., Miller, E. T., ... & Fink, D. (2021). Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data: An example using eBird data to estimate species distributions. Diversity and distributions, 27(7), 1265-1277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13271
dc.relation.referencesKelling, S., Johnston, A., Hochachka, W. M., Iliff, M., Fink, D., Gerbracht, J., ... & Yu, J. (2015). Can observation skills of citizen scientists be estimated using species accumulation curves?. PloS one, 10(10), e0139600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139600
dc.relation.referencesKelling, S., Fink, D., La Sorte, F. A., Johnston, A., Bruns, N. E., & Hochachka, W. M. (2015). Taking a 'Big Data' approach to data quality in a citizen science project. Ambio, 44(4), 601–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4
dc.relation.referencesKinzig AP, Warren P, Martin C, Hope D, Katti M. (2005) The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol. Soc. 10, 23. doi:10.5751/ES-01264-100123
dc.relation.referencesKhan, A. U., Saboor, A., Ali, I., Malik, W. S., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Urbanization of multidimensional poverty: empirical evidences from Pakistan. Quality & quantity, 50(1), 439-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0157-x
dc.relation.referencesKnapp, S., Aronson, M. F., Carpenter, E., Herrera-Montes, A., Jung, K., Kotze, D. J., ... & Hahs, A. K. (2021). A research agenda for urban biodiversity in the global extinction crisis. BioScience, 71(3), 268-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa141
dc.relation.referencesKrebs, C. J. (1999). Ecological Methodology. Addison.
dc.relation.referencesLangemeyer, J., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2018). Urban biodiversity and ecosystem services. Urban biodiversity. From research to practice, 36-53.
dc.relation.referencesLangebaek Rueda, C. H. (1995). Regional archaeology in the Muisca territory. A Study of the Fúquene and Susa Valleys. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
dc.relation.referencesLeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
dc.relation.referencesLeong, M., Dunn, R. R., & Trautwein, M. D. (2018). Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biology Letters, 14(5), 20180082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0082
dc.relation.referencesLi, E., Parker, S.S., Pauly, G.B., Randall, J.M., Brown, B.V., Cohen, B.S., (2019). An urbanbiodiversity assessment framework that combines an urban habitat classification scheme and citizen science data. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.0027.
dc.relation.referencesLockwood, J. L., Brooks, T. M., & McKinney, M. L. (2000). Taxonomic homogenization of the global avifauna. Animal Conservation, 3(1), 27–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00084.x
dc.relation.referencesMcDonald, R. I., Marcotullio, P. J., & Güneralp, B. (2013). Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment, 31-52.
dc.relation.referencesMarzluff, J. M. (2002). Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In J. Marzluff, R. Bowman, & R. Donnelly (Eds.), Avian ecology and conservation in an urban world (pp. 19–47). Springer Science.
dc.relation.referencesMarzluff, J. M. (2017). A decadal review of urban ornithology and a prospectus for the future. Ibis, 159(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12430
dc.relation.referencesMøller, A. P. (2009). Successful city dwellers: A comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia, 159(4), 849–858. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1259-8
dc.relation.referencesMontambault, J. R., Dormer, M., Campbell, J., Rana, N., Gottlieb, S., Legge, J., ... & Chakaki, M. (2018). Social equity and urban nature conservation. Conservation Letters, 11(3), e12423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12423
dc.relation.referencesMontoya, J. W. (2018). La urbanización planetaria y la dinámica contemporánea de las redes de ciudades. In J. W. Montoya (Ed.), Temas y problemas de geografía humana, una perspectiva contemporánea. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesMoore, J. H., Gibson, L., Amir, Z., Chanthorn, W., Ahmad, A. H., Jansen, P. A., & Luskin, M. S. (2023). The rise of hyperabundant native generalists threatens both humans and nature. Biological Reviews. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12985
dc.relation.referencesPardo, C. E. (2020). Estadística descriptiva multivariada. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesPebesma, E., & Bivand, R. (2023). Spatial data science: With applications in R. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
dc.relation.referencesPedlowski, M. A., Da Silva, V. A. C., Adell, J. J. C., & Heynen, N. C. (2002). Urban forest and environmental inequality in Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Urban Ecosystems, 6, 9-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025910528583
dc.relation.referencesPiketty, T. (2014). El capital en el siglo XXI. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesPimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., & Brooks, T. M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science, 269(5222), 347-350. DOI: 10.1126/science.269.5222.347
dc.relation.referencesPocock, M. J. O., Chandler, M., Bonney, R., Thornhill, I., Albin, A., August, T., ... & Danielsen, F. (2017). A vision for global biodiversity monitoring with citizen science. Biological Conservation, 213, 280–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003
dc.relation.referencesPocock, M. J. O., Tweddle, J. C., Savage, J., Robinson, L. D., & Roy, H. E. (2018). The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0192579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172579
dc.relation.referencesPomeroy, D., & Kibuule, M. (2017). Increasingly urban Marabou Storks start breeding four months early in Kampala, Uganda. Ostrich, 88(3), 261–266. DOI: 10.2989/00306525.2017.1308443
dc.relation.referencesQuimbayo Ruiz, G. A. (2024). Conflictos y ordenamiento territorial: injusticia, sufrimiento y acción ambiental en Bogotá. Cuadernos de Geografía: Revista Colombiana de Geografía, 33(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v33n1.100179
dc.relation.referencesQuimbayo Ruiz, G., Salo, M., Hiedanpää, J., & Kotilainen, J. (2024). Form and function in ecologizing spatial planning: learnings from Bogotá, Colombia. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15664-290433
dc.relation.referencesRavallion, M. (2002). On the urbanization of poverty. Journal of Development Economics, 68(2), 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00021-4
dc.relation.referencesReynolds, C., Byrne, M. J., Chamberlain, D. E., Howes, C. G., Seymour, C. L., Sumasgutner, P., & Taylor, P. J. (2021). Urban animal diversity in the Global South. In C. M. Shackleton, S. S. Cilliers, E. Davoren, & M. J. du Toit (Eds.), Urban ecology in the Global South. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesRincón, D. M. S. (2013). Protected areas in the city, urban wetlands of Bogotá. Cuadernos de vivienda y urbanismo, 6(11).
dc.relation.referencesRobb, G. N., McDonald, R. A., Chamberlain, D. E., & Bearhop, S. (2008). Food for thought: Supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(9), 476–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/060152
dc.relation.referencesRosenberg, K. V., Dokter, A. M., Blancher, P. J., Sauer, J. R., Smith, A. C., Smith, P. A., ... & Marra, P. P. (2019). Decline of the North American avifauna. Science, 366(6461), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1313
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, G. (2020). Bandoleros, gamonales y campesinos. El caso de la violencia en Colombia (Vol. 18). El Áncora Editores.
dc.relation.referencesSandoval Rincón, D. M. (2013). Áreas protegidas en la ciudad: los humedales urbanos de Bogotá. Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10554/25291
dc.relation.referencesSanz, V., & Caula, S. (2015). Assessing bird assemblages along an urban gradient in a Caribbean island (Margarita, Venezuela). Urban ecosystems, 18, 729-746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0426-4
dc.relation.referencesSecretaría Distrital de Planeación (2021). Diagnóstico POT Bogotá Reverdece.
dc.relation.referencesSchmeller, D. S., Henry, P. Y., Julliard, R., Gruber, B., Clobert, J., Dziock, F., ... & Henle, K. (2009). Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conservation Biology, 23(2), 307–316. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x.
dc.relation.referencesŞekercioğlu, Ç. H. (2006). Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(8), 464–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.007
dc.relation.referencesŞekercioğlu, Ç. H., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2016). Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(52), 18042–18047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408049101
dc.relation.referencesŞekercioğlu, Ç. H., Schneider, S. H., Fay, J. P., & Loarie, S. R. (2008). Climate change, elevational range shifts, and bird extinctions. Conservation biology, 22(1), 140-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00852.x
dc.relation.referencesSeto, K. C., Golden, J. S., Alberti, M., & Turner, B. L. (2017). Sustainability in an urbanizing planet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 8935-8938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606037114
dc.relation.referencesSeto, K. C., Parnell, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2013). A global outlook on urbanization. In T. Elmqvist (Ed.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities: A global assessment. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_1
dc.relation.referencesSchell, C. J., Dyson, K., Fuentes, T. L., Des Roches, S., Harris, N. C., Miller, D. S., ... & Lambert, M. R. (2020). The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science, 369(6510), eaay4497. DOI: 10.1126/science.aay4497
dc.relation.referencesSilvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
dc.relation.referencesStofberg, M., Cunningham, S. J., Sumasgutner, P., & Amar, A. (2019). Juggling a “junk-food” diet: responses of an urban bird to fluctuating anthropogenic-food availability. Urban Ecosystems, 22, 1019-1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00885-3
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, B. L., Aycrigg, J. L., Barry, J. H., Bonney, R. E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C. B., ... & Kelling, S. (2014). The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation, 169, 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, B. L., Phillips, T., Dayer, A. A., Wood, C. L., Farnsworth, A., Iliff, M. J., ... & Kelling, S. (2017). Using open access observational data for conservation action: A case study for birds. Biological Conservation, 208, 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.031
dc.relation.referencesTammaru, T., Marcin´czak, S., Aunap, R., van Ham, M., & Janssen, H. (2020). Relationship between income inequality and residential segregation of socioeconomic groups. Regional Studies, 54(4), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1540035
dc.relation.referencesVan der Hammen, T. (1998). Plan Ambiental de la Cuenca Alta del Río Bogotá. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca (CAR).
dc.relation.referencesvan Ham, M., Tammaru, T., Ubarevičienė, R., & Janssen, H. (2021). Rising inequalities and a changing social geography of cities: An introduction to the Global Segregation Book. In M. van Ham, T. Tammaru, R. Ubarevičienė, & H. Janssen (Eds.), Urban socio-economic segregation and income inequality (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64569-4_1.
dc.relation.referencesWang, S., Loreau, M., de Mazancourt, C., Isbell, F., Beierkuhnlein, C., Connolly, J., ... & Craven, D. (2021). Biotic homogenization destabilizes ecosystem functioning by decreasing spatial asynchrony. Ecology, 102(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3332
dc.relation.referencesWang Wei, J., Lee, B. P. Y., & Bing Wen, L. (2016). Citizen science and the urban ecology of birds and butterflies—a systematic review. Plos one, 11(6), e0156425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156425
dc.relation.referencesWard, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2018). Spatial regression models (Vol. 155). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesWhelan, C. J., Wenny, D. G., & Marquis, R. J. (2008). Ecosystem services provided by birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1134(1), 25–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003
dc.relation.referencesWood, E. M., & Esaian, S. (2020). The importance of street trees to urban avifauna. Ecological Applications, 30(1), e02010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2149
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biología::577 - Ecología
dc.subject.ddc710 - Planificación del área y arquitectura del paisaje
dc.subject.proposalEfecto de lujospa
dc.subject.proposalBiodiversidad urbanaspa
dc.subject.proposalCiencia ciudadanaspa
dc.subject.proposalEcología urbanaspa
dc.subject.proposalRegresión espacialspa
dc.subject.proposalLuxury effecteng
dc.subject.proposalUrban biodiversityeng
dc.subject.proposalCitizen scienceeng
dc.subject.proposalUrban ecologyeng
dc.subject.unescoDesigualdad socialspa
dc.subject.unescoSocial inequalityeng
dc.subject.unescoPlanificación urbanaspa
dc.subject.unescoUrban planningeng
dc.subject.unescoDiscriminaciónspa
dc.subject.unescoDiscriminationeng
dc.subject.wikidataecología urbanaspa
dc.subject.wikidataurban ecologyeng
dc.titleRelación entre la desigualdad social y la biodiversidad en la ciudad de Bogotáspa
dc.title.translatedRelationship between social inequality and biodiversity in the city of Bogotáeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentGrupos comunitarios
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticos
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Relación entre la desigualdad social y la biodiversidad en la ciudad de Bogotá.pdf
Tamaño:
6.54 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Geografía

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: