Transformación digital en el Estado: modelo conceptual para impulsar procesos de innovación pública
| dc.contributor.advisor | Bula Escobar, Jorge Ivan | spa |
| dc.contributor.author | Garcia Camargo, Jhon Alexander | spa |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001480272 | |
| dc.contributor.referee | Osorio Bustamante, Ferney | spa |
| dc.contributor.referee | Mora Parra, Nicolás | spa |
| dc.contributor.referee | Nova Caldas, Germán Enrique | spa |
| dc.contributor.referee | Castellanos Domínguez, Oscar Fernando | spa |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-26T18:33:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-26T18:33:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-11-25 | |
| dc.description | ilustraciones, gráficas, tablas | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | Se propone un modelo de transformación digital robusto y adaptable, fundamentado en análisis de caso múltiple de iniciativas de innovación pública, a partir de un análisis teórico y empírico de los principales referentes tanto en la literatura como en estudios similares de un modelo previo y enriquecido con la perspectiva de expertos en el sector público colombiano. El principal objetivo de este modelo conceptual es impulsar procesos de innovación pública, maximizando la creación de valor para la ciudadanía. A partir de una metodología mixta, se ilustra cómo pueden las entidades públicas transformar digitalmente la prestación de sus servicios a partir de la coproducción y crear valor público en el proceso, con miradas y perspectivas diferenciadas para centrar la construcción del modelo en el ciudadano o usuario final de los servicios públicos del Estado. Los resultados permiten delinear una hoja de ruta integral para aquellas entidades que buscan superar enfoques de digitalización superficial y avanzar hacia una transformación organizacional profunda, que implique cambios estructurales en los procesos, la cultura institucional y los modelos de gestión. Asimismo, se destaca el papel estratégico de los laboratorios de innovación pública como catalizadores de procesos colaborativos, de coproducción y de articulación de iniciativas escalables y sostenibles. (Texto tomado de la fuente). | spa |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation proposes a robust and adaptable digital transformation model, developed through a multiple case study analysis of public innovation initiatives. The model is grounded in both theoretical and empirical analyses of key references from academic literature and previous models, and is further enriched by insights from experts in the Colombian public sector. Its primary objective is to foster public sector innovation by maximizing public value creation. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study demonstrates how public entities can digitally transform their service delivery through co-production, thereby generating public value. The model is constructed from a citizen-centered perspective, incorporating diverse viewpoints to address the needs and experiences of public service end-users. The findings present a comprehensive roadmap for public organizations aiming to move beyond superficial digitalization toward a deep, structural transformation of their processes, organizational culture, and institutional frameworks. The research also underscores the strategic role of public innovation laboratories as enablers and catalysts of co-production, collaboration, and the development of scalable and sustainable initiatives. | eng |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Doctorado | spa |
| dc.description.degreename | Doctor en Ingeniería – Industria y Organizaciones | spa |
| dc.description.methods | Dado que el objeto de estudio son organizaciones (públicas) lo que a su vez implica el entendimiento de las personas que orientan y/o son impactadas por iniciativas estatales en torno a la transformación digital en el sector público, esta investigación se adentró en el fenómeno a través de una metodología comprensiva y rigurosa (Osborne, 2017). El diseño se estructuró a partir de un enfoque exploratorio-explicativo, iniciando con estudios de caso múltiples de tres proyectos de transformación digital en entidades públicas (JRC., 2019; Mele & Belardinelli, 2018; Mertens, 2010; Moré et al., 2018). Estos casos fueron seleccionados a partir de varios criterios relacionados con la generación de valor público (Acar et al., 2023; Picazo-Vela et al., 2021), democratización y participación ciudadana (Schmidthuber et al., 2019; Sousa Santos, 1998), creación de soluciones digitales (Bogers et al., 2021; Ertiö et al., 2019; Lwoga & Sangeda, 2018) y de manera transversal, cada caso contó con el acompañamiento activo de un laboratorio de innovación para facilitar elementos de coproducción y colaboración (Alsina et al., 2020; Baretta et al., 2024; Bovaird, 2007; Brandsen & Honingh, 2015; Osorio et al., 2019, 2020; Picazo-Vela et al., 2021; Piqueiras Conlledo, 2020), un aspecto clave que permitió una comprensión detallada y contextualizada de las dinámicas que se dan en la interfaz entre la tecnología, la cultura organizacional y las políticas públicas. La fase inicial, de carácter cualitativo, tuvo como propósito identificar tanto patrones como particularidades en los casos analizados. Este trabajo permitió establecer las condiciones necesarias para avanzar posteriormente hacia un análisis cuantitativo centrado en una estrategia específica (García Camargo et al., 2025; Johnson & Christensen, 2024). Este paso fue fundamental para ir más allá de la descripción y adentrarse en la medición de impacto y la identificación de correlaciones, ofreciendo una visión macro que complementaba la profundidad de los casos. La metodología también incorporó la investigación-acción, un componente que facilitó una intervención directa en el campo y un aprendizaje continuo frente a la ejecución de los proyectos y su posterior reconstrucción y análisis (E. James et al., 2012; Molineux, 2018; Møller et al., 2022). Este ciclo iterativo de planificación, acción, observación y reflexión permitió que la comprensión teórica se informara y refinara con la experiencia directa, algo vital en un campo tan dinámico como la transformación digital en el ámbito público (García-Navarro et al., 2018; E. James et al., 2012; McKay & Marshall, 2002). La culminación de este proceso, que transitó de lo general a lo particular, fue el desarrollo de un modelo conceptual de transformación digital. Su validez y pertinencia fueron evaluadas mediante el método Delphi, una técnica que involucró a expertos en la temática para obtener un consenso informado y asegurar la robustez del modelo propuesto (El-Garem & Adel, 2022; Sablatzky, 2022). De otra parte, la triangulación constante de datos y hallazgos a lo largo de las fases metodológicas —que, si bien se sucedieron linealmente en su progresión, fueron inherentemente iterativas y se retroalimentaban— fue crucial. Este proceso contribuyó a asegurar la solidez y coherencia en la construcción del modelo, al tiempo que facilitó el contraste de perspectivas y el fortalecimiento de las conclusiones emergentes, otorgando a la investigación un nivel significativo de robustez (Arango Serna et al., 2019; Bason & Austin, 2021; Bianchi et al., 2021; Cui & Osborne, 2022; Paula et al., 2022). La elección de esta aproximación metodológica híbrida y secuencial ofreció ventajas significativas que respondieron directamente a la complejidad de la transformación digital en el sector público. En primer lugar, la combinación de enfoques cualitativos y cuantitativos no fue una mera amalgama; más bien, permitió una comprensión profunda y holística del fenómeno (Hanelt et al., 2020; Marcel et al., 2024; OECD, 2024b; Weißmüller et al., 2023). Los estudios de caso múltiples desentrañaron la riqueza contextual, capturando las particularidades organizacionales y proyectuales de manera que ningún otro método habría podido. Esto se complementó con la capacidad del análisis cuantitativo para identificar tendencias generales y medir el impacto de ciertas estrategias, ofreciendo una visión macro que validaba o complejizaba las observaciones cualitativas (Eisenhardt, 1989; García Camargo et al., 2025; Halkias et al., 2022). La investigación-acción, por su parte, aportó una dimensión práctica y de aprendizaje continuo, permitiendo que la teoría se informara y refinara con la experiencia directa, algo clave en un campo en constante evolución (McKay & Marshall, 2002; Møller et al., 2022). Finalmente, el método Delphi garantizó la solidez conceptual y la coherencia interna del modelo, al tiempo que permitió contrastar diversas perspectivas y consolidar las conclusiones emergentes, dotando a la investigación de una base analítica robusta (García Camargo et al., 2025; Johnson & Christensen, 2024; Mergel et al., 2019). Este enfoque metodológico también presentó limitaciones inherentes que vale la pena mencionar. La principal fue, sin duda, la intensidad de recursos y tiempo que demandó. La combinación de múltiples métodos, especialmente los estudios de caso y la investigación-acción, exigió una inmersión profunda y sostenida en el campo, lo que implicó una dedicación considerable (Fetters et al., 2013; Mele & Belardinelli, 2018; Schoonenboom & Johnson, 2017). La gestión y articulación de datos cualitativos y cuantitativos no fue un ejercicio trivial; representó un desafío constante que exigió rigor metodológico para garantizar la coherencia y consistencia de la información. Si bien el análisis cuantitativo aportó elementos valiosos al estudio, la generalización de los hallazgos derivados de los estudios de caso debe abordarse con cautela. Las particularidades del contexto organizacional de las entidades públicas analizadas podrían no ser directamente extrapolables a otras instituciones del sector, lo que resalta la importancia de realizar adaptaciones y consideraciones específicas según el entorno (Eisenhardt, 1989; Gasco-Hernandez et al., 2022; Halkias et al., 2022; Ridder, 2017; Scupola & Mergel, 2022). Por último, la participación y el compromiso continuo de los expertos en el método Delphi: si bien fue un aporte valioso para la validación del modelo, también se constituyó como un aspecto que requirió una gestión cuidadosa y proactiva para mantener la motivación y la calidad de las contribuciones por parte de los expertos, además de contar con tiempo y agenda para la revisión de la información entregada (Philip et al., 2023; Sablatzky, 2022). | spa |
| dc.description.researcharea | Organizaciones, gestión de la tecnología y TIC’s | spa |
| dc.format.extent | vii, 419 páginas | spa |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.instname | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
| dc.identifier.reponame | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
| dc.identifier.repourl | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ | spa |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89152 | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | spa |
| dc.publisher.branch | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá | spa |
| dc.publisher.department | Departamento de Sistemas e Industrial | spa |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Ingeniería | spa |
| dc.publisher.place | Bogotá, Colombia | spa |
| dc.publisher.program | Bogotá - Ingeniería - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & Brocke, J. vom. (2019). Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal Information Management, 49, 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008 | |
| dc.relation.references | Acar, L., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2023). Public values? A systematic literature review into the outcomes of public service co-creation. Public Management Review, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2288248 | |
| dc.relation.references | Adomako, S., & Nguyen, N. P. (2023). Digitalization, inter-organizational collaboration, and technology transfer. Th eJournal Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10031-z | |
| dc.relation.references | Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 1. | |
| dc.relation.references | Aguilar Viana, A. C. (2021). Transformação digital na administração pública: do governo eletrônico ao governo digital. Revista Eurolatinoamericana Derecho Administrativo, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14409/redoeda.v8i1.10330 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alcaide–Muñoz, L., Rodr𝚤guez–Bol𝚤var, M. P., Cobo, M. J., & Herrera–Viedma, E. (2017). Analysing the scientific evolution of e-Government using a science mapping approach. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alford, J. (2002). Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?: Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration and Society, 34(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399702034001004 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. The American Review Public Administration, 38(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008314203 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alipour, S. M., Farazmand, A., & Hakamizadeh, F. (2024). Digital Transformation Research: Identifying The Elements Influencing Digital Transformation at the National Level. InternationalJournal Information Communication Technology Research, 16(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.61186/itrc.16.4.57 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alita, L., & Oosterveer, P. (2025). Co-Design for Public Service Innovation in China: The Enabling Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats. Public Performance and ManagementReview, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2480694 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alliance, S. (2016). The state of Scrum report 2017 edition. URL https://www.Scrumalliance.org/learnaboutScrum/state-scrum/2017-state-ofscrum (accessed: 1.09. 2020). | |
| dc.relation.references | Almazrouei, F., Elias Sarker, A., Zervopoulos, P., & Yousaf, S. (2024). Organizational structure, agility, and public value-driven innovation performance in the UAE public services. Heliyon, 10(13), 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33261 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alsaqqa, S., Sawalha, S., & Abdel-Nabi, H. (2020). Agile Software Development: Methodologies and Trends. InternationalJournal Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269 | |
| dc.relation.references | Alsina, V., Gomez, V., & Noveck, B. S. (2020). Laboratorios de Innovación Pública en América Latina y el Caribe desde una Perspectiva Comparada. GOVLAB - IDB. https://files.thegovlab.org/govlab-paraguay-innovation-labs.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Angelopoulos, M., & Pollalis, Y. (2021). Digital Transformation: From Data Analytics to Customer Solutions. A Framework of Types, Techniques and Tools. Archives Business Research, 9(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.96.10291 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Pathways to Co-created Public Value Outcomes. In Public Governance as Co-creation: A Strategy for Revitalizing the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy (pp. 136–160). Cambridge University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Arango Serna, M. D., Branch, J. W., Castro Benavides, L. M., & Burgos, D. (2019). Un modelo conceptual de transformación digital. Openergy y el caso de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Education Knowledge Society (EKS), 19(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks201819495107 | |
| dc.relation.references | Arias, F. D., Navarro, M., Elfanagely, Y., & Elfanagely, O. (2023). Biases in research studies. In Translational Surgery (pp. 191–194). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-90300-4.00082-3 | |
| dc.relation.references | Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001 | |
| dc.relation.references | Asher, M., Leston‐Bandeira, C., & Spaiser, V. (2019). Do Parliamentary Debates of e‐Petitions Enhance Public Engagement With Parliament? An Analysis of Twitter Conversations. Policy & Internet, 11(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.194 | |
| dc.relation.references | Báez, A. (2023). Gobernanza: estado del arte. Estudios la Gestión: Revista InternacionalAdministración, 13, 13. https://doi.org/10.32719/25506641.2023.13.6 | |
| dc.relation.references | Baiocchi, G. (2003). Emergent Public Spheres: Talking Politics in Participatory Governance. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088902 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bank, T. W. (2007). Participatory Budgeting (A. Shah, Ed.). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6923-4 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Baretta, J. V., Hoffmann, M. G., Militao, L., & Farias, J. S. (2024). Coproduction, public sector innovation and governance: a systematic literature review. International Journal Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-05-2023-0107 | |
| dc.relation.references | Barrios-Ulloa, A., Cama-Pinto, D., Arrabal-Campos, F. M., Mart𝚤nez-Lao, J. A., Monsalvo-Amaris, J., Hernández-López, A., & Cama-Pinto, A. (2023). Overview of Mobile Communications in Colombia and Introduction to 5G. Sensors, 23(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031126 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2007). How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills. The Quarterly Journal Economics, 122(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1721 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bartocci, L., Grossi, G., Mauro, S. G., & Ebdon, C. (2022). The journey of participatory budgeting: a systematic literature review and future research directions. InternationalReview Administrative Sciences, 89(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221078938 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bason, C., & Austin, R. D. (2021). Design in the public sector: Toward a human centred model of public governance. Public Management Review, 24(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1919186 | |
| dc.relation.references | Batlle-Montserrat, J., Abadal, E., & Blat, J. (2011). Benchmarking del e-Gobierno Local: Limitaciones de Los Métodos de Evaluación Comparativa. El Profesional la Informacion, 20(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.may.02 | |
| dc.relation.references | Beattie, M., & Buisman, H. (2025). Innovation labs can’t do it all…. https://oecd-opsi.org/blog/innovation-labs-cant-do-it-all/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Becerra, C. A. B. (2011). Presupuesto participativo herramienta para la democracia (G. (México) : C. del Estado de Jalisco : Instituto Electoral y de Participación Ciudadana de Jalisco, Ed.). | |
| dc.relation.references | Bem Machado, A. de, Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., & Lanzalonga, F. (2021). Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 20(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.2015261 | |
| dc.relation.references | Benczúr, A. (2003). The evolution of human communication and the information revolution — A mathematical perspective. Mathematical Computer Modelling, 38(7-9), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-7177(03)90055-0 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations. Information Polity, 19(1,2), 1,2. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-140328 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2003). Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Critical Care, 7(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2401 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777 | |
| dc.relation.references | Biswas, A. (2023). E-Governance: Meaning, Objectives, Features, and 4 Types. https://doi.org/https://schoolofpoliticalscience.com/what-is-e-governance/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Blind, K., Petersen, S. S., & Riillo, C. A. F. (2017). The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets. ResearchPolicy, 46(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.003 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bogers, M. L. A. M., Garud, R., Thomas, L. D. W., Tuertscher, P., & Yoo, Y. (2021). Digital innovation: transforming research and practice. Innovation, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.2005465 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bogotá, A. M. de. (2020). Gobierno Abierto de Bogotá. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bogotá, S. D. de Planeación de. (2023). Planeación y presupuesto participativo. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bonnin Roca, J. (2024). Regulatory agencies as innovation enablers: a conceptualization. Science Public Policy, 51(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae049 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value. VOLUNTAS International Journal Voluntary Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E., Yates, S., Van Ryzin, G., & Alford, J. (2021). International survey evidence on user and community co-delivery of prevention activities relevant to public services and outcomes. Public Management Review, 25(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1991665 | |
| dc.relation.references | Boztepe, S., Christiansson, J., Götzen, A. de, Hepburn, L.-A., & Keinonen, T. (2024). Rethinking design in the public sector: A relational turn. https://doi.org/10.57698/V18I3.01 | |
| dc.relation.references | Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2015). Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., & Del Giudice, M. (2018). The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 136, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Brudney, J. L. (2019). Rethinking coproduction: amplifying involvement and effectiveness. Journal Chinese Governance, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1666542 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bryda, G., & Costa, A. P. (2023). Qualitative Research in Digital Era: Innovations, Methodologies and Collaborations. SocialSciences, 12(10), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100570 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bryer, J., & Speerschneider, K. (2022). Package ‘likert. | |
| dc.relation.references | Budayová, Z., Pavliková, M., Samed Al-Adwan, A., & Klasnja, K. (2022). The Impact of Modern Technologies on Life in a Pandemic Situation. Journal Education Culture Society, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.213.224 | |
| dc.relation.references | Buonocore, M. N., Martino, M. D., & Ferro, C. (2021). Digital transformation and cities: How COVID-19 has boosted a new evolution of urban spaces. Journal Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 15(1), 1. | |
| dc.relation.references | Burnes, B., & Jackson, P. (2011). Success and Failure In Organizational Change: An Exploration of the Role of Values. Journal Change Management, 11(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2010.524655 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cabannes, Y. (2015). The impact of participatory budgeting on basic services: municipal practices and evidence from the field. Environment Urbanization, 27(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815572297 | |
| dc.relation.references | CAF. (2023). Segundo Concurso Buenas Prácticas Regulatorias. https://www.caf.com/media/4019722/dictamen-de-ganadores-del-concurso.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Cai, Y., & Lattu, A. (2021). Triple Helix or Quadruple Helix: Which Model of Innovation to Choose for Empirical Studies? Minerva, 60(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09453-6 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cantillo Arce, S., Osorio, F., Gabriel, A., Rodríguez, L. A., & Camargo, M. (2025). Sustainable Value Creation Methodology for Multistakeholder Collaboration: Application for InnoLabs. In Human-Centred Technology Management for a Sustainable Future (pp. 295–304). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72490-9_29 | |
| dc.relation.references | Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265306 | |
| dc.relation.references | Castellanos Aceros, H. (2001). Historiografía de la Ingeniería de Sistemas en la U. N. Ingeniería e Investigación, 47, 47. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.n47.21344 | |
| dc.relation.references | Castiblanco Abril, O. L., & Vizcaino Arevalo, D. F. (2018). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Autor: Uwe Flick. http://hdl.handle.net/11349/18887 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cepiku, D., Marsilio, M., Sicilia, M., & Vainieri, M. (2022). A comprehensive framework for the activation, management, and evaluation of Co-production in the public sector. Journal Cleaner Production, 380, 135056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135056 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cette, G., & Lopez, J. (2012). ICT demand behaviour: an international comparison. Economics Innovation New Technology, 21(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2011.595921 | |
| dc.relation.references | Chakraborty, M., & Kundan, A. (2021). Monitoring Cloud-Native Applications. Apress L. P. | |
| dc.relation.references | Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2020). Service Design and Citizen Satisfaction with E‐Government Services: A Multidimensional Perspective. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13308 | |
| dc.relation.references | Chang, W. C., Lin, W. Z., Chen, W.-Z., Chiou, W.-K., & Lin, O. S. (2025). Design-driven innovation in the public sector: insights from case studies of initiatives in Taiwan. Journal Asian Public Policy, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2025.2457166 | |
| dc.relation.references | Charles Hodges, T. T. & A. B. Stephanie Moore Barb Lockee. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. | |
| dc.relation.references | Chávez-Rivas, P. I., & Heredia-Llatas, F. D. (2024). Modernización de la gestión pública en los diferentes niveles de gobierno, una revisión literaria. Revista Nacional Administración, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22458/rna.v14i2.3978 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ciric, D., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D., Palcic, I., & Zivlak, N. (2018). Agile Project Management in New Product Development and Innovation Processes: Challenges and Benefits Beyond Software Domain. 2018 IEEE International Symposium Innovation Entrepreneurship(TEMSISIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE.2018.8478461 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cohen, D., Lindvall, M., & Costa, P. (2004). An introduction to agile methods. Adv.Comput., 62(03), 03. | |
| dc.relation.references | Cole, L. (2021). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. Policy Design Practice, 5(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619 | |
| dc.relation.references | Colombia, M. de Educación Nacional de. (2021). Buenas prácticas en innovación educativa y transformación digital. | |
| dc.relation.references | Colombia, S. de la República de. (2019). LEY 1978 DE 2019. Senado de la República de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=98210 | |
| dc.relation.references | Combita, J., Uribe, P., Sedano, J., Serrano, L., & Herrera, L. (2023). Transformación Digital: experiencias colectivas (E. U. N. de Colombia, Ed.). Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia. | |
| dc.relation.references | Commission, E. (2013). Powering European public sector innovation: towards a new architecture : report of the expert group on public sector innovation. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2777/51054 | |
| dc.relation.references | Comunicaciones, D. N. de Tecnologías de la Información y las. (2015). PETI UNAL 2015. | |
| dc.relation.references | Comunicaciones MINTIC, M. de las Tecnologías de la Información y. (2022a). Política de Gobierno Digital. https://gobiernodigital.mintic.gov.co/portal/Politica-de-Gobierno-Digital/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Comunicaciones MINTIC, M. de Tecnologías de la Información y las. (2022b). Índice de Brecha Digital 2021. MINTIC Colombia. https://colombiatic.mintic.gov.co/679/articles-238353_recurso_1.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Governmen tInformation Quarterly, 29(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005 | |
| dc.relation.references | Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of E‐Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Coyle, C. L., & Vaughn, H. (2008). Social networking: Communication revolution or evolution? BellLabs Technical Journal, 13(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/bltj.20298 | |
| dc.relation.references | CRC. (2020a). CRC liderará primer Sandbox Regulatorio en servicios de telecomunicaciones en el mundo. CRC. https://www.crcom.gov.co/es/noticias/comunicado-prensa/crc-liderara-primer-sandbox-regulatorio-en-servicios-telecomunicaciones | |
| dc.relation.references | CRC. (2020b). REVISIÓN DEL FORMATO 1.2. “TARIFAS Y SUSCRIPTORES DE PLANES INDIVIDUALES Y EMPAQUETADOS” DEL TÍTULO DE REPORTES DE INFORMACIÓN DE LA RESOLUCIÓN CRC 5050 DE 2016 Documento Soporte. https://www.crcom.gov.co/system/files/Proyectos Comentarios/2000-71-15/Propuestas/documento_soporte1_2.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | CRC. (2020c). Agenda Regulatoria 2020-2021. https://www.crcom.gov.co/es/proyectos-regulatorios/5000-2020-1#: :text=La Comisión de Regulación de Comunicaciones (CRC) presenta,publicado por la CRC en octubre de 2019. | |
| dc.relation.references | CRC. (2021). Con éxito concluyó la primera convocatoria del Sandbox Regulatorio en servicios de comunicaciones en el mundo liderado por la CRC. https://www.crcom.gov.co/es/noticias/comunicado-prensa/con-exito-concluyo-primera-convocatoria-sandbox-regulatorio-en-servicios | |
| dc.relation.references | CRC. (2022). Comparador de planes de Internet, telefonía y TV por suscripción. https://comparador.crcom.gov.co/terms | |
| dc.relation.references | CRC. (2024a). RESOLUCIÓN No. 7285 DE 2024 “Por la cual se adoptan medidas para la promoción de la competencia, se modifican algunas disposiciones de la Resolución CRC 5050 de 2016 y se dictan otras disposiciones. https://www.crcom.gov.co/sites/default/files/normatividad/00007285.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | CRC. (2024b). RESOLUCIÓN No. 7285 DE 2024 “Por la cual se adoptan medidas para la promoción de la competencia, se modifican algunas disposiciones de la Resolución CRC 5050 de 2016 y se dictan otras disposiciones. https://www.crcom.gov.co/sites/default/files/normatividad/00007285.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cubo, A., Carrión, J. L. H., Porrúa, M., & Roseth, B. (2022). Guía de transformación digital del gobierno. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.18235/0004402 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cui, T., & Osborne, S. P. (2022). New development: Value destruction in public service delivery—a process model and its implications. Public Money & Management, 43(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2126645 | |
| dc.relation.references | Davidson, P. (2024). Exploring the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Delphi Studies: A Comparative Analysis of Human and AI Expert Panels. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:274959647 | |
| dc.relation.references | Daymond, J., & Knight, E. (2023). Design Thinking in Business and Management: Research History, Themes, and Opportunities. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.386 | |
| dc.relation.references | Deroncele-Acosta, A., Palacios-Núñez, M. L., & Toribio-López, A. (2023). Digital Transformation and Technological Innovation on Higher Education Post-COVID-19. Sustainability, 15(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032466 | |
| dc.relation.references | Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028 | |
| dc.relation.references | Díez-Guitiérrez, E.-J., & Gajardo Espinoza, K. (2022). Educar y evaluar durante el confinamiento en España: mundo rural y urbano. Education Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e26312. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.26312 | |
| dc.relation.references | DNP. (2019). POLÍTICA NACIONAL PARA LA TRANSFORMACIÓN DIGITAL E INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3975.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Doherty, N. F., Coombs, C. R., & Loan-Clarke, J. (2006). A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: redressing the balance between the social and the technical. European Journal Information Systems, 15(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000653 | |
| dc.relation.references | Donner, J., & Escobari, M. X. (2010). A review of evidence on mobile use by micro and small enterprises in developing countries. Journal International Development, 22(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1717 | |
| dc.relation.references | Dragičević, N., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2023). Design thinking capabilities in the digital world: A bibliometric analysis of emerging trends. Frontiers Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478 | |
| dc.relation.references | Dragu, T., & Lupu, Y. (2021). Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights. International Organization, 75(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818320000624 | |
| dc.relation.references | Duncombe, R. (2015). Mobile Phones for Agricultural and Rural Development: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research. The European Journal Development Research, 28(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.60 | |
| dc.relation.references | Edquist, C. (2019). Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model? Research Policy, 48(4), 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008 | |
| dc.relation.references | Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy Management Review, 14(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557 | |
| dc.relation.references | El-Garem, A., & Adel, R. (2022). Applying Systematic Literature Review and Delphi Methods to Explore Digital Transformation Key Success Factors. International Journal Economics Management Engineering, 16(7), 7. https://publications.waset.org/vol/187 | |
| dc.relation.references | Elia, G., Solazzo, G., Lerro, A., Pigni, F., & Tucci, C. L. (2024). The digital transformation canvas: A conceptual framework for leading the digital transformation process. Business Horizons, 67(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.03.007 | |
| dc.relation.references | Elmawazini, K., Atallah, G., Rafiquzzaman, M., & Guesmi, K. (2022). Do regulatory policies matter to corporate innovation? International Review Financial Analysis, 84, 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102398 | |
| dc.relation.references | Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Eom, S.-J., & Lee, J. (2022). Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future direction. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ertiö, T.-P., Tuominen, P., & Rask, M. (2019). Turning Ideas into Proposals: A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki. In P. Panagiotopoulos, N. Edelmann, O. Glassey, G. Misuraca, P. Parycek, T. Lampoltshammer, & B. Re (Eds.), Electronic Participation (pp. 15–25). Springer International Publishing. | |
| dc.relation.references | Fakhar Manesh, M., Pellegrini, M. M., Marzi, G., & Dabic, M. (2021). Knowledge Management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Mapping the Literature and Scoping Future Avenues. IEEE Transactions Engineering Management, 68(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2019.2963489 | |
| dc.relation.references | Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review. International Journal E-Planning Research, 7(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2018070105 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fernández, A., Gómez, B., Binjaku, K., & Meçe, E. K. (2023). Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review. Education Information Technologies, 28(10), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fernández-Portillo, A., Almodóvar-González, M., & Hernández-Mogollón, R. (2020). Impact of ICT development on economic growth. A study of OECD European union countries. Technology Society, 63, 101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101420 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 6pt2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fischer, C., Heuberger, M., & Heine, M. (2021). The impact of digitalization in the public sector: a systematic literature review. Dermoderne Staat–Zeitschriftfür Public Policy, Rechtund Management, 14(1-2021), 1-2021. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v14i1.13 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fischer, M., Imgrund, F., Janiesch, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2020). Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: Defining meta objectives using business process management. Information & Management, 57(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103262 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fletcher, G., & Griffiths, M. (2020). Digital transformation during a lockdown. International Journal Information Management, 55, 102185. | |
| dc.relation.references | Fresán Orozco, M. (2004). La extensión universitaria y la Universidad Pública. REencuentro. Análisis Problemas Universitarios. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34003906 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gable, M. (2014). Efficiency, Participation, and Quality: Three Dimensions of E-Government? Social Science Computer Review, 33(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314552390 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gálvez Albarrac𝚤n, E. J. (2014). Tecnolog𝚤as de información y comunicación, e innovación en las MIPYMES de Colombia. Cuadernos administración (Universidad del Valle), 30(51), 51. | |
| dc.relation.references | García, Á. L., & Satrústegui, A. U. (2017). De la Innovación Social a la Innovación Pública: un marco para la reflexión en la reforma de las políticas públicas. | |
| dc.relation.references | Garcia, C., Suarez, J., Niño, D., Roa, O., Barbosa, A., Plazas, J., Garcia, J., López, J., & Picón, I. (2023). Data as a tool for regulation and decision-making in telecommunications services: An academy-state innovation experience. Kalpa Publications Computing. https://doi.org/10.29007/s4j3 | |
| dc.relation.references | Garcia, C., Suarez, J., Roa, O., Torres, A., & Garcia, J. (2021). Gobiernos abiertos, ciudadan𝚤a que decide. Transformación digital del mecanismo de presupuestos participativos en Bogotá. The 1st LACCEI International MultiConference Entrepreneurship, Innovation,Regional Development“Ideas Overcome Emerge Pandemic Crisis. https://doi.org/10.18687/leird2021.1.1.1 | |
| dc.relation.references | García Camargo, J. A., García Acevedo, A. C., Ramírez, C. S., & Martínez Medina, S. (2024). El sandbox regulatorio del sector de las comunicaciones: un ejemplo de innovación en la gestión pública en Colombia. Revista Doctrina Distrital, 4(3), 3. https://doctrinadistrital.com/ojs2/index.php/RevistaDoctrinaDistrital/article/view/121 | |
| dc.relation.references | García Camargo, J. A., Niño Torres, J. D., López-Castiblanco, J. A., Herrera-Quintero, L. K., & Bula Escobar, J. I. (2025). Digital Transformation: Perspectives and Post-Pandemic Adaptation in the Education Sector – A Case Study. Ingeniería e Investigación, 44(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.112661 | |
| dc.relation.references | Garcia, J., Pacheco, L., Alarcón, L., Parra, N., Silva, M., & Bula, J. (2022, November). DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL CONTENT: INCLUSIVE PEDAGOGY AS A PUBLIC INNOVATION SCHEME TO STRENGTHEN CITIZEN LEARNING PROCESSES. ICERI2022 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.0161 | |
| dc.relation.references | García-Navarro, J., Ramírez, F. J., & Ruíz-Ortega, M. J. (2018). Using Action Research to Implement an Operating Efficiency Initiative in a Local Government. Systemic Practice Action Research, 32(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9451-1 | |
| dc.relation.references | Garriga-Portolà, M., & López-Ventura, J. (2014). The Role of Open Government in Smart Cities. In Open Government (pp. 205–216). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_13 | |
| dc.relation.references | Garzón, J. S. E., & Quintero, L. K. H. (2024). Ecosistema de transformación digital intersedes : gobernanza, experiencias y talento en cultura digital. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85852 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gasco-Hernandez, M., Nasi, G., Cucciniello, M., & Hiedemann, A. M. (2022). The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities. Urban Governance, 2(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.09.005 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gawłowski, R. (2018). Co-production as a tool for realisation of public services. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2(44)/2018, 2(44)/2018. https://doi.org/10.15678/zp.2018.44.2.05 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gemini. (2025). Respuesta Prompt a partir de las categorías y agrupaciones previamente realizadas, compara con el modelo que se te presenta y ofrece alternativas de mejora de este, fruto de la revisión de los expertos que ya procesaste. | |
| dc.relation.references | Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2017). Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review. Journal Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y | |
| dc.relation.references | Gillani, F., Chatha, K. A., Jajja, S. S., Cao, D., & Ma, X. (2024). Unpacking Digital Transformation: Identifying key enablers, transition stages and digital archetypes. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 203, 123335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123335 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gilman, H. R. (2016). Engaging Citizens: Participatory Budgeting and the Inclusive Governance Movement within the United States. Ash Center Occasional Papers. | |
| dc.relation.references | Giraldo, D. F. B., & Báquiro, J. C. A. (2020). Appropriation of ICT in the educational field: approach to public policy in Colombia years 2000-2019. Digital Education Review, 37, 37. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.109-129 | |
| dc.relation.references | Goktas, H. O., & Yumusak, N. (2024). Applying the Delphi Method to Assess Critical Success Factors of Digitalization While Sustaining Lean at a Lean Automaker. Sustainability, 16(19), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198424 | |
| dc.relation.references | Goldfrank, B. (2006). LOS PROCESOS DE “PRESUPUESTO PARTICIPATIVO” EN AMÉRICA LATINA: ÉXITO, FRACASO Y CAMBIO. Revista ciencia política (Santiago), 26(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2006000200001 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gómez, E. (2019). Gobierno Abierto: Un análisis de su adopción en los Gobiernos Locales desde las Pol𝚤ticas Públicas. Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=zD24DwAAQBAJ | |
| dc.relation.references | González-Zapata, F., & Piccinin-Barbieri, M. (2021). Development Co-operation Report 2021: Shaping a Just Digital Transformation. In Development Co-operation Report. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/ce08832f-en | |
| dc.relation.references | Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball Sampling. In The Annals of Mathematical Statistics (No. 1; Vol. 32, Issue 1, pp. 148–170). Institute of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148 | |
| dc.relation.references | Goodrick, D. (2016). Estudios de caso comparativos. In Methodological Briefs (No. 9; Issue 9, p. 20). UNICEF. | |
| dc.relation.references | Guadalupi, C., Figueroa, N., & Lemus, J. (2024). Regulation and Responsible Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4984370 | |
| dc.relation.references | Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., Sánchez-Rivas, E., & Colomo-Magaña, E. (2020). ICT resources for research: an ANOVA analysis on the digital research skills of higher education teachers comparing the areas of knowledge within each gender. Education Information Technologies, 25(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10176-6 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gurumurthy, R., & Schatsky, D. (2019). Pivoting to digital maturity: Seven capabilities central to digital transformation. Delloite insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/digital-maturity/digital-maturity-pivot-model.html | |
| dc.relation.references | Gurusamy, K., Srinivasaraghavan, N., & Adikari, S. (2016). An Integrated Framework for Design Thinking and Agile Methods for Digital Transformation. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Thinking and Methods (pp. 34–42). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_4 | |
| dc.relation.references | Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288892 | |
| dc.relation.references | Guzmán-Pardo, M. A., & Herrera-Quintero, L. K. (2023). Women at the Faculty of Engineering of Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá Campus: History, Present, and Future. Ingeniería e Investigación, 43(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.101200 | |
| dc.relation.references | Halkias, D., Neubert, M., Thurman, P. W., & Harkiolakis, N. (2022). The Multiple Case Study Design: Methodology and Application for Management Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003244936 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Marante, C. A. (2020). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal Management Studies, 58(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hansen, M. B., & Nørup, I. (2017). Leading the Implementation of ICT Innovations. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12807 | |
| dc.relation.references | Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents Pharmacy Teaching Learning, 7(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2023). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917 | |
| dc.relation.references | Heilig, L., Schwarze, S., & Voss, S. (2017). An Analysis of Digital Transformation in the History and Future of Modern Ports. Proceedings 50th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences (2017). https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.160 | |
| dc.relation.references | Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2015). The shape of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301368251.pdf#page=438 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hernández-Bello, A., & Agudelo-Londoño, S. M. (2021). La pandemia de COVID-19 en Colombia y los desafíos de la respuesta sanitaria. Gerencia y Políticas Salud, 20, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.rgps20.covid | |
| dc.relation.references | Herrera, L. K., Combita-Pulido, J., Parra-Ortiz, N. P., Torres, J., & Perez Zapata, G. A. (2021). Estrategia De Digitalización Para Los Laboratorios De La Universidad Nacional De Colombia: Evaluación E Implementación. Proceedings 19th LACCEI International Multi-ConferenceEngineering,Education, Technology: “Prospective Trends technologySkills sustainable social development” “Leveraging emerging technologiesConstruct future. https://doi.org/10.18687/laccei2021.1.1.438 | |
| dc.relation.references | Herrera Quintero, L. K., Adolfo, P. Z. G., Helena, S. R. L., Carolina, U. P. P., Eduardo, C. P. J., Alexander, S. D. J., Marisol, M. A., Fernanda, L. D. M., Fernando, G. V. J., Eduardo, B. G., Lizeth, R. C. D., Girlesa, L. Q. M., Constanza, P. G. L., Elizabeth, L. G., Gustavo, C. M. H., Mercedes, L. S. L., Marielys, F. A., Alejandra, B. R. C., M., A.-O. A., … Nubia, S. C. (2023). Transformación Digital: experiencias colectivas. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83677 | |
| dc.relation.references | Herrera Quintero, L. K., Jacobo, Z. F., & Carolina, U. P. P. (2024). Bit a bit : la transformación digital de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86007 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hertzum, M. (2020). Usability Testing: A Practitioner’s Guide to Evaluating the User Experience. In Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02227-2 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hidalgo, E. S. (2019). Adapting the scrum framework for agile project management in science: case study of a distributed research initiative. Heliyon, 5(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01447 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hiller, R. M., Halligan, S. L., Meiser-Stedman, R., Elliott, E., Rutter-Eley, E., & Hutt, T. (2021). Coping and support-seeking in out-of-home care: a qualitative study of the views of young people in care in England. BMJ Open, 11(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038461 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information Organization, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hollweck, T. (2015). Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). CanadianJournal Program Evaluation, 30(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hong, S., Kim, S. H., & Kwon, M. (2022). Determinants of digital innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101723 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hout, M. A. R. van, Braams, R. B., Meijer, P., & Meijer, A. J. (2024). Designing an instrument for scaling public sector innovations. Science Public Policy, 51(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae007 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hron, M., & Obwegeser, N. (2022). Why and how is Scrum being adapted in practice: A systematic review. Journal Systems Software, 183, 111110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111110 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal Qualitative Studies Health Well-being, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.23606 | |
| dc.relation.references | Imgrund, F., Fischer, M., Janiesch, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2018). Approaching Digitalization with Business Process Management. | |
| dc.relation.references | Imran, F., Shahzad, K., Butt, A., & Kantola, J. (2021). Digital Transformation of Industrial Organizations: Toward an Integrated Framework. Journal Change Management, 21(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1929406 | |
| dc.relation.references | Jack, E. P., & Raturi, A. S. (2006). Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research. Management Research News, 29(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610683833 | |
| dc.relation.references | James, E., Slater, T., & Bucknam, A. (2012). Action Research for Business, Nonprofit, & Public Administration: A Tool for Complex Times. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387468 | |
| dc.relation.references | James, M. A. (2015). Managing the Classroom for Creativity. Creative Education, 06(10), 10. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.610102 | |
| dc.relation.references | Janowski, T. (2015a). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. In Government Information quarterly (No. 3; Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 221–236). Elsevier. | |
| dc.relation.references | Janowski, T. (2015b). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001 | |
| dc.relation.references | Janssen, M., & Voort, H. van der. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal Information Management, 55, 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102180 | |
| dc.relation.references | Jiménez, M. T. (2021). Factores que influyen en la transformación digital en las instituciones de educación superior. Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Bogotá. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80121 | |
| dc.relation.references | Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications. | |
| dc.relation.references | Johnston, K. A., Jali, N., Kundaeli, F., & Adeniran, T. (2015). ICTs for the Broader Development of South Africa: An Analysis of the Literature. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 70 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00503.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Joia, L. A., & Michelotto, F. (2020). Universalists or Utilitarianists? The Social Representation of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil. Sustainability, 12(24), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410434 | |
| dc.relation.references | JRC., C. (2019). Exploring digital government transformation in the EU: analysis of the state of the art and review of literature. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2760/17207 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ju, A., Sajnani, H., Kelly, S., & Herzig, K. (2021, May). A Case Study of Onboarding in Software Teams: Tasks and Strategies. 2021IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference Software Engineering (ICSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/icse43902.2021.00063 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kahn, T., Baron, A., & Vieyra, J. C. (2018). Digital Technologies for Transparency in Public Investment: New Tools to Empower Citizens and Governments. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001418 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kankanhalli, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Tayi, G. K. (2017). Open innovation in the public sector: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.12.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Khan, A., & Krishnan, S. (2021). Citizen engagement in co-creation of e-government services: a process theory view from a meta-synthesis approach. InternetResearch, 31(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-03-2020-0116 | |
| dc.relation.references | Khine, P. K., Mi, J., & Shahid, R. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services. Sustainability, 13(12), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126730 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kiki, T. E., & Lawrence, E. (2006). Government as a Mobile Enterprise: Real-time, Ubiquitous Government. Third International Conference Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG’06). https://doi.org/10.1109/itng.2006.68 | |
| dc.relation.references | Klika, C., & Longinidou, E. (2024). The Role of Innovation Labs in Public Sector: Concepts and Conditions for Successful Transformation. EIPA. https://www.eipa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/EPSA-Briefing_Innovation-Labs.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Kotamraju, N. P., & Geest, T. M. van der. (2012). The tension between user-centred design and e-government services. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2011.563797 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kraemer, K., & King, J. L. (2006). Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will E-Government Be Different? International Journal Electronic Government Research, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006010101 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research. Sage Open, 11(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576 | |
| dc.relation.references | Krogh, A. H. (2022). Embedding of public sector innovation labs. Politica, 54(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i3.133920 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Voet, J. V. der. (2013). THE MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW. Public Administration, 92(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kumar, R., & Thakurta, R. (2024). Digital Transformation: An Enterprise Transformation Theory Perspective: Exploring the underlying constituents of Digital transformation from the lens of Enterprise Transformation Theory. Australasian Journal Information Systems, 28. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v28.4259 | |
| dc.relation.references | LAB101 UNAL, L. de innovación creatividad y nuevas tecnologías. (2023). Aprendizajes y reflexiones para políticas públicas. LAB101 UNAL. https://sites.google.com/view/lab101unal/blog-101 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lanter, D., & Essinger, R. (2017). User‐Centered Design. In International Encyclopedia of Geography (pp. 1–4). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0432 | |
| dc.relation.references | Larios, V. M., Gomez, L., Mora, O. B., Maciel, R., & Villanueva-Rosales, N. (2016, September). Living labs for smart cities: A use case in Guadalajara city to foster innovation and develop citizen-centered solutions. 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). https://doi.org/10.1109/isc2.2016.7580773 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lavonen, J. (2020). Curriculum and Teacher Education Reforms in Finland That Support the Development of Competences for the Twenty-First Century. In Audacious Education Purposes (pp. 65–80). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3_3 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lecours, A. (2020). Scientific, professional and experiential validation of the model of preventive behaviours at work: protocol of a modified Delphi Study. BMJ Open, 10(9), 9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035606 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. Journal Marketing, 80(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lewis, J. M., McGann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2023). When design meets power: design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policy-making. In Policy-Making as Designing (pp. 125–150). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447365952.ch006 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2021). USABILITY AND USER EXPERIENCE: DESIGN AND EVALUATION. In HANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS (pp. 972–1015). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch38 | |
| dc.relation.references | Li, L., Li, N., & Kong, Q. (2024). A Conceptual Framework for Digital Transformation in the Era of Digital Economy: A New Perspective. 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference Electronic InformationCommunicationTechnology(ICEICT), 1188–1192. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceict61637.2024.10670999 | |
| dc.relation.references | Liang, D., & Tian, J. (2024). The Impact of Digital Transformation on the High-Quality Development of Enterprises: An Exploration Based on Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 16(8), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083188 | |
| dc.relation.references | Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lips, M. (2024). Digital transformation in the public sector. In Collaborating for Digital Transformation (pp. 13–30). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923895.00010 | |
| dc.relation.references | Liu, S. M., & Yuan, Q. (2015). The Evolution of Information and Communication Technology in Public Administration. Public Administration Development, 35(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1717 | |
| dc.relation.references | Liva, G., Codagnone, C., Misuraca, G., Gineikyte, V., & Barcevicius, E. (2020, September). Exploring digital government transformation: a literature review. Proceedings 13th International Conference Theory Practice Electronic Governance. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428578 | |
| dc.relation.references | López González, W. O. (2013). El estudio de casos: una vertiente para la investigación educativa. Educere. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35630150004 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lucassen, G., Dalpiaz, F., Werf, J. M. E. M. van der, & Brinkkemper, S. (2016). The Use and Effectiveness of User Stories in Practice. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 205–222). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30282-9_14 | |
| dc.relation.references | Luna, D. E., Picazo-Vela, S., Buyannemekh, B., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2024). Creating public value through digital service delivery from a citizen’s perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101928 | |
| dc.relation.references | Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 31(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lwoga, E. T., & Sangeda, R. Z. (2018). ICTs and development in developing countries: A systematic review of reviews. THEELECTRONICJOURNALOFINFORMATIONSYSTEMSINDEVELOPINGCOUNTRIES, 85(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12060 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2023). Emerging trends in social media for E-governance and citizen engagement: A case study of telegram in Cambodia. Computers Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100347 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. TechnologicalForecasting Social Change, 175, 121359. | |
| dc.relation.references | Lyytinen, K. (2021). Innovation logics in the digital era: a systemic review of the emerging digital innovation regime. Innovation, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1938579 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2005). The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings. In Advanced Topics in End User Computing, Volume 4 (pp. 112–128). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-474-3.ch006 | |
| dc.relation.references | MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e‐Government: A Public Value Perspective. PublicAdministrationReview, 82(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13413 | |
| dc.relation.references | Magistretti, S., Pham, C. T. A., & Dell’Era, C. (2021). Enlightening the dynamic capabilities of design thinking in fostering digital transformation. IndustrialMarketingManagement, 97, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.06.014 | |
| dc.relation.references | Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2021). Hidden patterns of knowledge evolution in fluid digital innovation. Innovation, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1879653 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mallakin, M., Dery, C., Vaillancourt, S., Gupta, S., & Sellen, K. (2023). Web-Based Co-design in Health Care: Considerations for Renewed Participation. InteractiveJournal Medical Research, 12, e36765. https://doi.org/10.2196/36765 | |
| dc.relation.references | Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. TechnologicalForecasting Social Change, 173, 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mao, Z., Zou, Q., Yao, H., & Wu, J. (2021). The application framework of big data technology in the COVID-19 epidemic emergency management in local government—a case study of Hainan Province, China. BMCPublicHealth, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12065-0 | |
| dc.relation.references | Marcel, Gaol, F. L., Supangkat, S. H., & Ranti, B. (2024). Toward Digital Transformation Adoption: A Conceptual Framework from Transformational Leadership Perspective. ProcediaComputerScience, 234, 1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.113 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mariani, I., D’Aleo, G., Mortati, M., & Rizzo, F. (2024, June). Shaping Public Sector Digital Transformation through Design. Translation approaches on training programs as multi-stakeholder ecosystems. DRS2024Boston. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.1048 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozial forschung Forum Qualitative Social Research, Vol 1, No 2 (2000): Qualitative Methods in Various Disciplines I: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-1.2.1089 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mazzucato, M., & Kattel, R. (2020). COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. OxfordReview Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), Supplement_1. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mbuyisa, B., & Leonard, A. (2016). The Role of ICT Use in SMEs Towards Poverty Reduction: A Systematic Literature Review: ICT Use in SMEs Towards Poverty Reduction. Journal International Development, 29(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3258 | |
| dc.relation.references | McGowan, D., Morley, C., Hansen, E., Shaw, K., & Winzenberg, T. (2024). Experiences of participants in the co-design of a community-based health service for people with high healthcare service use. BMCHealthServicesResearch, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10788-5 | |
| dc.relation.references | McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2002). Action research: a guide to process and procedure. In D. Remenyi (Ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (pp. 219–227). MCIL. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235942689_Action_Research_A_Guide_to_Process_and_Procedure | |
| dc.relation.references | Meijer, A., Lorenz, L., & Wessels, M. (2021). Algorithmization of Bureaucratic Organizations: Using a Practice Lens to Study How Context Shapes Predictive Policing Systems. PublicAdministrationReview, 81(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13391 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mele, V., & Belardinelli, P. (2018). Mixed Methods in Public Administration Research: Selecting, Sequencing, and Connecting. Journal Public Administration ResearchTheory, 29(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy046 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. GovernmentinformationQuarterly, 36(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2025). Co-Production Phases in the Development and Implementation of Digital Public Services. Perspectives Public ManagementGovernance. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 35(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mergel, I., Kattel, R., Lember, V., & McBride, K. (2018, May). Citizen-oriented digital transformation in the public sector. Proceedings 19th Annual International ConferenceDigitalGovernmentResearchGovernance Data Age. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209294 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative Mixed Methods Research. QualitativeInquiry, 16(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612 | |
| dc.relation.references | Messiha, K., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Ket, H. C. F. F., An, Q., Anand-Kumar, V., Longworth, G. R., Chastin, S., & Altenburg, T. M. (2023). Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health. Journal Public Health, 45(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046 | |
| dc.relation.references | Miller, R. L. (2015). Rogers’ Innovation Diffusion Theory (1962, 1995). In Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption (pp. 261–274). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch016 | |
| dc.relation.references | MINTIC. (2018). Manual para la implementación de Gobierno Digital. | |
| dc.relation.references | MINTIC. (2022a). Decreto 767 de 2022. Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. | |
| dc.relation.references | MINTIC. (2022b). Decreto 1263 de 2022. Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. | |
| dc.relation.references | Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2016). Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges. AustralianJournal Public Administration, 75(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12211 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mishler, E. (1990). Validation in Inquiry-Guided Research: The Role of Exemplars in Narrative Studies. HarvardEducationalReview, 60(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.60.4.n4405243p6635752 | |
| dc.relation.references | Molineux, J. (2018). Using action research for change in organizations: processes, reflections and outcomes. Journal Work-Applied Management, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwam-03-2017-0007 | |
| dc.relation.references | Møller, C., Hansen, A. K., Palade, D., Sørensen, D. G. H., Hansen, E. B., Uhrenholt, J. N., & Larsen, M. S. S. (2022). An Action Design Research Approach to Study Digital Transformation in SME. In The Future of Smart Production for SMEs (pp. 51–65). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15428-7_5 | |
| dc.relation.references | Montero, R. (2023). Transformación Digital: experiencias colectivas (E. U. N. de Colombia, Ed.; Primera). Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia. | |
| dc.relation.references | Moore, M. H. (1997). Creating Public Value (p. 416). Harvard University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Moré, R. P. O., Goncalo, C. R., Fiates, G. G. S., & Andrade, C. R. D. (2018). Governance structure promoting innovation: an exploratory study in Brazilian habitats. Journal technology management & innovation, 13(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242018000400061 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mu, R., Wang, Y., & Song, H. (2022). How does technological system design affect value creation? A systematic literature review of digital co-production. GlobalPublicPolicy Governance, 2(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00051-0 | |
| dc.relation.references | Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2018). Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. TechnologicalForecasting Social Change, 132, 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019 | |
| dc.relation.references | Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction. PublicAdministrationReview, 77(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765 | |
| dc.relation.references | Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field. Academy Management Perspectives, 25(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.3.zol40 | |
| dc.relation.references | Narula, R., & Santangelo, G. D. (2009). Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry. ResearchPolicy, 38(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.005 | |
| dc.relation.references | Navarro Burgos, A. J. (2023). La transferencia de pol𝚤ticas públicas de gobierno abierto en Colombia: análisis al CONPES de estado abierto, GANA y GAB. | |
| dc.relation.references | Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüs, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries: Effects of teacher autonomy, collaborative culture, and professional learning. Teaching Teacher Education, 106, 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103463 | |
| dc.relation.references | Nguyen, H. N., Lasa, G., Iriarte, I., Atxa, A., Unamuno, G., & Galfarsoro, G. (2022). Human-centered design for advanced services: A multidimensional design methodology. AdvancedEngineeringInformatics, 53, 101720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101720 | |
| dc.relation.references | Noll, J., Razzak, M. A., Bass, J. M., & Beecham, S. (2017). A Study of the Scrum Master’s Role. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 307–323). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_22 | |
| dc.relation.references | Nordberg, K., & Aflaki, I. N. (2024). Public sector readiness for value co-creation: the diffusion of a governance innovation. PublicMoney&Management, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2397050 | |
| dc.relation.references | Nørgaard Olesen, S., & Giacalone, D. (2018). The influence of packaging on consumers’ quality perception of carrots. Journal Sensory Studies, 33(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12310 | |
| dc.relation.references | Noticias UNAL, A. de. (2021). Inició estrategia de digitalización de laboratorios de la Facultad de Minas. | |
| dc.relation.references | O.Luna, A. J. H. d., Kruchten, P., E.Pedrosa, M. L. G. do, Neto, H. R. d. A., & Moura, H. P. d. M. (2014). State of the Art of Agile Governance: A Systematic Review. InternationalJournal Computer ScienceInformationTechnology, 6(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2014.6510 | |
| dc.relation.references | OCDE. (2017). Revisión de Gobierno Digital de Colombia. Hacia un sector público impulsado por el ciudadano. OCDE. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Digital%20Gov%20Review%20Colombia%20[Esp]%20def.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2016). Digital Government Strategies for Transforming Public Services in the Welfare Areas. In OECD Digital Government Studies. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/0d2eff45-en | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2021). Supporting the Digital Transformation of Higher Education in Hungary (p. 158). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/d30ab43f-en | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2024a). 2023 OECD Digital Government Index: Results and key findings. In OECD Public Governance Policy Papers. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/1a89ed5e-en | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2024b). The Digital Transformation of Public Procurement in Ireland: A Report on the Current State. In OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/87912457-en | |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. (2024c). Global Trends in Government Innovation 2024: Fostering Human-Centred Public Services. In OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c1bc19c3-en | |
| dc.relation.references | Ofoma, C. (2024). Digitalization and Public Value Co-Creation in Public Sector Organizations : The Citizens as Co-Creators. InstitutionesAdministrationis, 4(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.98 | |
| dc.relation.references | Oliveira, M., Zancul, E., & Salerno, M. S. (2024). Capability building for digital transformation through design thinking. TechnologicalForecasting Social Change, 198, 122947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122947 | |
| dc.relation.references | OPSI, O. (2022). Innovative Capacity of Governments: A Systemic Framework. https://oecd-opsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/OECD-OPSI-Innovative-Capacity-Framework.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Orozco, M. L. C. (2021). Capacidades digitales como base de la transformación digital. Una propuesta para la Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81030 | |
| dc.relation.references | Osborne, S. P. (2017). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? PublicManagementReview, 20(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461 | |
| dc.relation.references | Osborne, S. P., Powell, M., Cui, T., & Strokosch, K. (2022). Value Creation in the Public Service Ecosystem: An Integrative Framework. PublicAdministrationReview, 82(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13474 | |
| dc.relation.references | Osorio, F., Cruz, F., Camargo, M., Dupont, L., & Peña, J. I. (2024). Exploring team roles for social innovation labs: Toward a competence-based role self-assessment approach. Journal EngineeringTechnologyManagement, 71, 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101799 | |
| dc.relation.references | Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity Innovation Management, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12301 | |
| dc.relation.references | Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Sandoval, C., & Peña, J. I. (2020). Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogota: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders. Journal Innovation Economics & Management, n° 31(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0066 | |
| dc.relation.references | Osorio, F., Giones, F., Dupont, L., & Camargo, M. (2025). Innovation labs strategy: unfolding the multifaceted role of strategic intent. Technovation, 141, 103170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103170 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. WorldDevelopment, 24(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(96)00023-x | |
| dc.relation.references | Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Percy, S. L. (1978). The Public Service Production Process: A Framework for Analyzing Police Services. PolicyStudiesJournal, 7(s1), s1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01782.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Othman, N. Z., & Hussin, A. R. C. (2024). Public Value Creation towards a Seamless End-To-End Services in E-Government: A Systematic Literature Review. InternationalJournal Academic ResearchBusiness Social Sciences, 14(12), 12. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i12/24185 | |
| dc.relation.references | Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019). Public value creation in digital government. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 36(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 | |
| dc.relation.references | Panagiotopoulos, P., Protogerou, A., & Caloghirou, Y. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and ICT utilization in public organizations: An Empirical testing in local government. LongRangePlanning, 56(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102251 | |
| dc.relation.references | Parker, S., Cluley, V., & Radnor, Z. (2022). A typology of dis/value in public service delivery. PublicMoney&Management, 43(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2124758 | |
| dc.relation.references | Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981). CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS. PolicyStudiesJournal, 9(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Parrado, Y., Barbosa, A., Mahé, D., Toro, S., & Garcia, J. (2020). Informe de barreras a la innovación pública. Departamento Nacional de Planeación DNP y Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Laboratorio de innovación, creatividad y nuevas tecnologías LAB101. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/ModernizacionEstado/EiP/Estudio_barreras_innovaci%C3%B3n_Regi%C3%B3n_Central.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Paula, D. de, Marx, C., Wolf, E., Dremel, C., Cormican, K., & Uebernickel, F. (2022). A managerial mental model to drive innovation in the context of digital transformation. Industry Innovation, 30(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2072711 | |
| dc.relation.references | Pentland, B. T., Recker, J., Wolf, J., & Wyner, G. (2020). Bringing Context Inside Process Research with Digital Trace Data. Journal AssociationInformationSystems, 21(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00635 | |
| dc.relation.references | Perikangas, S., & Tuurnas, S. (2023). Design for inclusive digital co-production. PublicManagementReview, 26(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2224819 | |
| dc.relation.references | Philip, J., Gilli, K., & Knappstein, M. (2023). Identifying key leadership competencies for digital transformation: evidence from a cross-sectoral Delphi study of global managers. Leadership&OrganizationDevelopmentJournal, 44(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2022-0063 | |
| dc.relation.references | Picazo-Vela, S., Luna, D. E., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2021). Creating Public Value Through Inter-Organizational Collaboration and Information Technologies. InternationalJournal Electronic Government Research, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.288069 | |
| dc.relation.references | Piqueiras Conlledo, P. (2020). Del compromiso ciudadano a la coproducción. Análisis del concepto y casos de la administración pública. Cuadernos Gobierno y Administración Pública, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5209/cgap.64948 | |
| dc.relation.references | Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. EuropeanManagementJournal, 41(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007 | |
| dc.relation.references | Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. HigherEducation Future, 8(1), 1. | |
| dc.relation.references | Portafolio. (2022). ¡De no creer! En Colombia hay más celulares activos que personas. https://www.portafolio.co/tendencias/celulares-en-colombia-hay-mas-telefonos-moviles-activos-que-personas-573094#: :text=En Colombia cada ciudadano posee,% del mercado de celulares). | |
| dc.relation.references | Poulose, S., Bhattacharjee, B., & Chakravorty, A. (2024). Determinants and drivers of change for digital transformation and digitalization in human resource management: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework building. ManagementReviewQuarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00423-2 | |
| dc.relation.references | Qader, N. N., & Kheder, M. Q. (2016). Challenges and Factors affecting the implementation of e-Government in Iraq. Journal UniversityHumanDevelopment, 2(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v2n3y2016.pp476-481 | |
| dc.relation.references | Qiao, G., Li, Y., & Hong, A. (2024). The Strategic Role of Digital Transformation: Leveraging Digital Leadership to Enhance Employee Performance and Organizational Commitment in the Digital Era. Systems, 12(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110457 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ramachandran, K. M., & Tsokos, C. P. (2014). Mathematical Statistics with Applications in R. Elsevier Science. https://books.google.it/books?id=5AJ0AwAAQBAJ | |
| dc.relation.references | Ramírez Cano, D. E. (2017). Experiencias de gobierno abierto en Bogotá. CEPAL. https://repository.unad.edu.co/handle/10596/13922 | |
| dc.relation.references | Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., & Matos, P. (2018). Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research. In Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 411–421). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41 | |
| dc.relation.references | Reis, J., & Melão, N. (2023). Digital transformation: A meta-review and guidelines for future research. Heliyon, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12834 | |
| dc.relation.references | Richaud, M. C. (2005). Desarrollos del análisis factorial para el estudio de ítem dicotomicos y ordinales. Interdisciplinaria. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=18022206 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ridder, H.-G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. BusinessResearch, 10(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z | |
| dc.relation.references | Ríos Obando, J. F., & Cruz Aguilar, P. L. (2022). ANTECEDENTES Y MARCO DE REFERENCIA DE LA GOBERNANZA Y LA PROSPECTIVA ESTRATÉGICA. In El reto de la construcción de la gobernanza del sistema de competitividad, ciencia, tecnología e innovación en el Valle del Cauca. Un desafío para la región (pp. 197–205). Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle. https://doi.org/10.25100/peu.680.cap16 | |
| dc.relation.references | Rocha, J. A. O., & Zavale, G. J. B. (2021). Innovation and Change in Public Administration. OpenJournal Social Sciences, 09(06), 06. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.96021 | |
| dc.relation.references | Rodriguez Müller, A. P., Casiano Flores, C., Albrecht, V., Steen, T., & Crompvoets, J. (2021). A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence on (Digital) Public Services Co-Creation. AdministrativeSciences, 11(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040130 | |
| dc.relation.references | Roedder, N., Dauer, D., Laubis, K., Karaenke, P., & Weinhardt, C. (2016). The digital transformation and smart data analytics: An overview of enabling developments and application areas. 2016IEEEInternationalConference Big Data (Big Data), 2795–2802. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2016.7840927 | |
| dc.relation.references | Roth, R. (2017). User Interface and User Experience (UI/UX) Design. GeographicInformationScience&TechnologyBody Knowledge, 2017(Q2), Q2. https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2017.2.5 | |
| dc.relation.references | Routzouni, A., Vasilakis, N. D., Kapetanakis, S., Gritzalis, S., & Pouloudi, A. (2021). Public sector innovation through design thinking: Applying a participatory policy design practice to support the formulation of a national digital transformation strategy. 14thInternationalConference TheoryPractice Electronic Governance, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494208 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ruijer, E., Détienne, F., Baker, M., Groff, J., & Meijer, A. J. (2019). The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency. TheAmericanReview Public Administration, 50(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019888065 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ruvalcaba, E., & Criado, I. (2019). Gobierno abierto: Nuevas tendencias en la gestión pública. Innovación abierta, gobernanza inteligente y tecnologías sociales en unas administraciones públicas colaborativas. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. Nóesis.Revista Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 28(56), 56. https://doi.org/10.20983/noesis.2019.2.5 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ryan, B. (2012). Co‐production: Option or Obligation? AustralianJournal Public Administration, 71(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00780.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Sablatzky, T. (2022). Delphi Method. HypothesisResearchJournal Health Information Professionals, 34(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18060/26224 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sacavém, A., Bem Machado, A. de, Santos, J. R. dos, Palma-Moreira, A., Belchior-Rocha, H., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2025). Leading in the Digital Age: The Role of Leadership in Organizational Digital Transformation. AdministrativeSciences, 15(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15020043 | |
| dc.relation.references | Saeedikiya, M., Salunke, S., & Kowalkiewicz, M. (2025). The nexus of digital transformation and innovation: A multilevel framework and research agenda. Journal Innovation & Knowledge, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100640 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sampaio, R. C. (2016). e-Orçamentos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitação: uma prospecção dos principais casos e reflexões sobre a e-Participação. Revista Administração Pública, 50(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612152210 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. - 6. edición (p. 600). McGraw Hill Education. | |
| dc.relation.references | Sánchez Bravo, Á. A. (2020). Marco Europeo para una inteligencia artificial basada en las personas: European framework for people-based artificial intelligence. InternationalJournal Digital Law, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.47975/ijdl/1bravo | |
| dc.relation.references | Sánchez, N. R. O. (2013). Éxitos y fracasos en las spin-off académicas. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/11945 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sandoval-Almazan, R., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Luna-Reyes, L. F., Luna, D. E., & Rojas-Romero, Y. (2012, October). Open government 2.0: citizen empowerment through open data, web and mobile apps. Proceedings 6th International ConferenceTheory PracticeElectronicGovernance. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463728.2463735 | |
| dc.relation.references | Santos, C. A. G. (2021). Generación de mecanismos de co-evolución de las SI/TI con la estrategia en una institución de educación superior (Caso Universidad Nacional de Colombia) [UNAL]. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80759 | |
| dc.relation.references | Santos Tavares, L. A. dos Ana Paula; Joia, & Fornazin, M. (2021). Digital Transformation for Development: A Multilevel Conceptual Framework. In GlobDev. Association for Information Systems. | |
| dc.relation.references | Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 31, S63–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008 | |
| dc.relation.references | Schmidthuber, L., Piller, F., Bogers, M., & Hilgers, D. (2019). Citizen participation in public administration: investigating open government for social innovation. R&DManagement, 49(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12365 | |
| dc.relation.references | Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. KZfSSKölnerZeitschriftfürSoziologieundSozialpsychologie, 69(S2), S2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1 | |
| dc.relation.references | Schot, J., & Steinmueller, E. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change: Innovation policy 3.0. SPRUSciencePolicyResearchUnit,University Sussex: Brighton, UK. http://www.tipconsortium.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SchotSteinmueller_FramingsWorkingPaperVersionUpdated2018.10.16-New-copy.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Schuppan, T. (2009). E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 26(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006 | |
| dc.relation.references | Schütz, F., Heidingsfelder, M. L., & Schraudner, M. (2019a). Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation. SheJiTheJournal Design, Economics,Innovation, 5(2), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Schütz, F., Heidingsfelder, M. L., & Schraudner, M. (2019b). Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation. SheJiTheJournal Design, Economics,Innovation, 5(2), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Scupola, A., & Mergel, I. (2022). Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 39(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101650 | |
| dc.relation.references | Seri, P., & Zanfei, A. (2013). The co-evolution of ICT, skills and organization in public administrations: Evidence from new European country-level data. StructuralChange Economic Dynamics, 27, 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.07.003 | |
| dc.relation.references | Severance, T. (2025). What are Regulated Communications? Thetalake. https://thetalake.com/blog/regulated-communications/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Shahzad, K., Imran, F., & Butt, A. (2025). Digital Transformation and Changes in Organizational Structure: Empirical Evidence from Industrial Organizations. ResearchTechnologyManagement, 68(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2025.2465706 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sicilia, M., Sancino, A., Nabatchi, T., & Guarini, E. (2019). Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review. PublicMoney&Management, 39(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904 | |
| dc.relation.references | Silva Junior, A. C. da, Emmendoerfer, M. L., & Silva, M. A. C. (2024). Innovation labs in the light of the New Public Service model. RAM.Revista Administração Mackenzie, 25(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramc240079 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2015). Enhancing Public Innovation through Collaboration, Leadership and New Public Governance. In New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research (pp. 145–169). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_8 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sousa Santos, B. de. (1998). Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy. Politics&Society, 26(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329298026004003 | |
| dc.relation.references | Spradling, C. D. (2007). SPEC CPU2006 benchmark tools. ACMSIGARCHComputerArchitectureNews, 35(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1241601.1241625 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sraml Gonzalez, J., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2021). Innovation in established industries undergoing digital transformation: the role of collective identity and public values. Innovation, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1938578 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sreenivasan, A., & Suresh, M. (2023). Digital transformation in start-ups: a bibliometric analysis. DigitalTransformation Society, 2(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/dts-12-2022-0072 | |
| dc.relation.references | Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis. InternationalJournal Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107 | |
| dc.relation.references | Stare, A. (2014). Agile Project Management in Product Development Projects. ProcediaSocial Behavioral Sciences, 119, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.034 | |
| dc.relation.references | Steiner, A., Farmer, J., Yates, S., Moran, M., & Carlisle, K. (2022). How to systematically analyze co‐production to inform future policies? Introducing <scp>5Ws</scp> of co‐production. PublicAdministrationReview, 83(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13571 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sumner, J., Chong, L. S., Bundele, A., & Wei Lim, Y. (2020). Co-Designing Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review. TheGerontologist, 61(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa064 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sverrisdottir, H. S., Ingason, H. T., & Jonasson, H. I. (2014). The Role of the Product Owner in Scrum-comparison between Theory and Practices. ProcediaSocial Behavioral Sciences, 119, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.030 | |
| dc.relation.references | Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. InternationalJournal Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356 | |
| dc.relation.references | Thompson, F. J., & Riccucci, N. M. (1998). REINVENTING GOVERNMENT. AnnualReview Political Science, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.231 | |
| dc.relation.references | Tõnurist, P., & Hanson, A. (2020). Anticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making. In OECD Working Papers on Public Governance (No. 44; Issue 44). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/cce14d80-en | |
| dc.relation.references | Torres Melo, J., & Alba Abril, F. (2021). Apuesta por un gobierno abierto en Bogotá DC, Colombia: un marco de pol𝚤tica para la acción. GobiernoabiertoYciudadan𝚤aEnelCentro la gestión pública: selecciónArt𝚤culos investigación. Santiago: CEPAL, 2021. LC/TS. 2021/114. p. 213-226. | |
| dc.relation.references | Tripathi, R., & Gupta, M. P. (2014). Evolution of government portals in India: mapping over stage models. Journal Enterprise Information Management, 27(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-09-2012-0068 | |
| dc.relation.references | Trischler, J., & Westman Trischler, J. (2021). Design for experience – a public service design approach in the age of digitalization. PublicManagementReview, 24(8), 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1899272 | |
| dc.relation.references | Tsotsas, I., & Fragidis, G. (2024). The Contribution of Service Design in Public Sector Modernization: Challenges, Barriers and Opportunities of the Design Methods. ICPA2024, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024111002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 36(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ubaldi, B., Maria, E., Petrucci, E., & Biancalana, C. (2019). State of the art in the use of emerging technologies in the public sector. In OECD Working Papers on Public Governance (No. 31; Issue 31). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/932780bc-en | |
| dc.relation.references | UNAL. (2020). Méntor y otros proyectos impulsan emprendimientos universitarios. https://agenciadenoticias.unal.edu.co/detalle/mentor-y-otros-proyectos-impulsan-emprendimientos-universitarios | |
| dc.relation.references | UNAL, A. (2022). LAB101 UNAL, contenidos pedagógicos al alcance de todos. https://agenciadenoticias.unal.edu.co/detalle/lab101-unal-contenidos-pedagogicos-al-alcance-de-todos | |
| dc.relation.references | Urbinati, A., Manelli, L., Frattini, F., & Bogers, M. L. A. M. (2021). The digital transformation of the innovation process: orchestration mechanisms and future research directions. Innovation, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1963736 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vagena, F., & Sneiders, E. (2024). Introducing co-creation into transformational Government. Proceedings 17th International ConferenceTheory PracticeElectronicGovernance, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3680127.3680149 | |
| dc.relation.references | Valle-Cruz, D., & Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2014). E-gov 4.0. Proceedings 15th Annual International ConferenceDigitalGovernmentResearchdg.otextquotesingle14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612788 | |
| dc.relation.references | Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. (2023). Best practices for digital transformation based on a systematic literature review. DigitalTransformation Society, 2(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/dts-11-2022-0057 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vărzaru, A. A., & Bocean, C. G. (2024). Digital Transformation and Innovation: The Influence of Digital Technologies on Turnover from Innovation Activities and Types of Innovation. Systems, 12(9), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090359 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vaskelainen, T., Münzel, K., Boon, W., & Frenken, K. (2021). Servitisation on consumer markets: entry and strategy in Dutch private lease markets. Innovation, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1915791 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2021). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. InformationSystemsFrontiers, 25(3), 3. | |
| dc.relation.references | Veldhoven, Z. V., Etikala, V., Goossens, A., & Vanthienen, J. (2021). A Scoping Review of the Digital Transformation Literature Using Scientometric Analysis. BusinessInformationSystems, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.52825/bis.v1i.49 | |
| dc.relation.references | Venkatraman, M. (1994). It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:34185076 | |
| dc.relation.references | Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. VOLUNTASInternationalJournal VoluntaryNonprofitOrganizations, 23(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. ManagingDigitalTransformation, 13–66. | |
| dc.relation.references | Villodre, J. (2019). Innovación pública abierta = Open innovation in the public sector. EUNOMÍA.RevistaEnCultura la Legalidad, 314–327. https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2019.5036 | |
| dc.relation.references | Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. PublicManagementReview, 17(9), 9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vortico. (2025). FABLAB 4.0. https://www.vortico.co/fablab-unal | |
| dc.relation.references | Vries, H. de, Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. SSRNElectronicJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2638618 | |
| dc.relation.references | Wang, F., & Dai, X. (2020). Regulation and product innovation: the intermediate role of resource reallocation. Journal Evolutionary Economics, 30(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00676-6 | |
| dc.relation.references | Wang, H. (2023). How can digital government governance creates public value in the new era. In Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Public Service, Economic Management and Sustainable Development (PESD 2023) (pp. 180–186). Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-344-3_23 | |
| dc.relation.references | Weißmüller, K. S., Ritz, A., & Yerramsetti, S. (2023). Collaborating and co-creating the digital transformation: Empirical evidence on the crucial role of stakeholder demand from Swiss municipalities. PublicPolicy Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231170100 | |
| dc.relation.references | West, D. M. (2004). E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. PublicAdministrationReview, 64(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x | |
| dc.relation.references | Williamson, C., Kelly, P., Tomasone, J. R., Bauman, A., Mutrie, N., Niven, A., Richards, J., & Baker, G. (2021). A modified Delphi study to enhance and gain international consensus on the Physical Activity Messaging Framework (PAMF) and Checklist (PAMC). InternationalJournal Behavioral NutritionPhysicalActivity, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01182-z | |
| dc.relation.references | Wu, Y.-H., Ware, C., Damn ee, S., Kerherv e, H. el ene, & Rigaud, A.-S. (2015). Bridging the digital divide in older adults: A study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies. ClinicalInterventions Aging, 193. | |
| dc.relation.references | Yi, C., Qiu, X., & Li, H. (2025). Exploring the roles of non-profit organizations in co-production: a systematic literature review. PublicManagementReview, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2484661 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research Commentary—The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. InformationSystemsResearch, 21(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yu, H., & Robinson, D. G. (2012). The New Ambiguity of “Open Government. SSRNElectronicJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2012489 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yu, X., & Khazanchi, D. (2017). Using Embedded Mixed Methods in Studying IS Phenomenon: Risks and Practical Remedies with an Illustration. Communications AssociationInformationSystems, 41, 18–42. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.04102 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yunis, M., Tarhini, A., & Kassar, A. (2018). The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship. Journal Business Research, 88, 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.030 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zewge, A., & Dittrich, Y. (2015). Systematic mapping study of information communication technology research for agriculture (in case of developing Countries). | |
| dc.relation.references | Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Dasgupta, R. K., & Xia, R. (2022). Narrowing the agebased digital divide: Developing digital capability through social activities. InformationSystemsJournal, 33(2), 2. | |
| dc.relation.references | Zhu, Z.-Y., Xie, H.-M., & Chen, L. (2023). ICT industry innovation: Knowledge structure and research agenda. TechnologicalForecasting Social Change, 189, 122361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122361 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zou, Q., Mao, Z., Yan, R., Liu, S., & Duan, Z. (2023). Vision and reality of e-government for governance improvement: Evidence from global cross-country panel data. TechnologicalForecasting Social Change, 194, 122667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122667 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. GovernmentInformationQuarterly, 38(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zyzak, B., Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K., & Jensen, M. R. (2024). Public value management in digital transformation: a scoping review. InternationalJournal Public Sector Management, 37(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-02-2024-0055 | |
| dc.relation.references | Aboal, D., & Tacsir, E. (2017). Innovation and productivity in services and manufacturing: the role of ICT. Industrial Corporate Change, 27(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx030 | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 350 - Administración pública y ciencia militar::351 - Administración pública | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Transformación digital | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Innovación pública | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Coproducción | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Administración pública | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Diseño centrado en los usuarios | spa |
| dc.subject.proposal | Digital transformation | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Public innovation | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Co-production | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | Public administration | eng |
| dc.subject.proposal | User centered design | eng |
| dc.subject.unesco | Innovación | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Innovation | eng |
| dc.subject.unesco | Función pública | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Civil service | eng |
| dc.subject.unesco | Sector público | spa |
| dc.subject.unesco | Public sector | eng |
| dc.title | Transformación digital en el Estado: modelo conceptual para impulsar procesos de innovación pública | spa |
| dc.title.translated | Digital transformation in the state: a conceptual model to promote public innovation processes | eng |
| dc.type | Trabajo de grado - Doctorado | spa |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 | |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |
| dc.type.content | Text | |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis | |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
| dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Público general | spa |
| dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Investigadores | spa |
| dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopment | Responsables políticos | spa |
| oaire.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- Tesis doctorado Jhon Alexander Garcia Camargo.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 15.1 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
Bloque de licencias
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 5.74 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción:

