Niveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotá

dc.contributor.advisorMoreno Gómez, Luz Ángela
dc.contributor.authorLondoño Arévalo, María Antonieta
dc.contributor.colaboratorHenao Gómez, Liliana
dc.contributor.colaboratorLópez Cadena, Andrés Fernando
dc.contributor.cvlacLondoño Arévalo, María [https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001569205]spa
dc.contributor.orcidLondoño Arévalo, Maria [0000-0002-1441-3354]spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación en Radiología E Imágenes Diagnósticas (Grid)spa
dc.coverage.cityBogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:36:05Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:36:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas, fotografías, gráficasspa
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los niveles de referencia diagnóstico locales (NRDL) y las dosis alcanzables (DA) para pacientes pediátricos durante los procedimientos de tomografía computarizada (TC) más comunes en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia. Metodología: Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de corte transversal que incluyó estudios en un periodo de tiempo comprendido entre enero 2019 y abril 2022, de una fase, de cráneo, tórax simple, tórax contrastado y abdomen-pelvis contrastado. El Nivel de referencia de diagnóstico (NRD) se obtuvo en función del índice de dosis de TC de volumen (CTDI vol) y el producto de longitud de dosis (DLP) para cinco grupos de edad en población pediátrica (hasta 18 años). Resultados: Los datos de los pacientes (577) en cuanto a CTDI vol y DLP se registraron de cinco grupos etarios, de tal forma que los resultados pudieran ser comparados con las publicaciones existentes en la literatura. Los percentiles 75 de CTDI vol y DLP se consideraron como valores de NRDL y los percentiles 50 se describieron como DA para esos parámetros. En consecuencia, los NRDL adquiridos se compararon con otros valores publicados nacional e internacionalmente. Conclusiones: El NRD desempeña un papel fundamental en la optimización de las dosis de radiación administradas a los pacientes y en la mejora de su protección. Este estudio proporciona los NRD y AD locales para la tomografía computarizada pediátrica más común en el Hospital de referencia y se plantean propuestas de mejora que permitan optimizar la práctica clínica y seguridad de los pacientes. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine local diagnostic reference levels (LDRL) and achievable doses (AD) of common pediatric CT procedures in a third-level pediatric hospital in the city of Bogotá Colombia. Methodology: Retrospective cross-sectional descriptive observational study that included single phase studies (head CT, thorax with and without contrast and abdomen-pelvis) between January 2019 and April 2022. Standard dose indexes (volume CT dose index - CTDI vol- and dose length product -DLP- were categorized by body part and age in patients under 18 years of age. Results: Patient data (577 studies) on CTDI vol and DLP were recorded from five age groups so that the results could be compared with the existing publications in the literature. The 75th percentiles of CTDI vol and DLP were considered as LDRL values and the 50 th percentiles were described as DA. Accordingly, the acquired LDRL were compared with national and international published values Conclusions: DRL plays a critical role in optimizing radiation doses administered to patients and improving radioprotection. This study provides the local DRL and AD for the most common pediatric computed tomography studies in the reference hospital and proposes strategies to promote the improvement and optimizing clinical practice and patient safety.eng
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicasspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Radiología Pediátricaspa
dc.description.methodsEstudio Observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de corte transversalspa
dc.description.researchareaImágenes pediátricasspa
dc.format.extent59 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82905
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Radiología Pediátricaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbalo, K. D., Rage, E., Leuraud, K., Richardson, D. B., le Pointe, H. D., Laurier, D., & Bernier, M. O. (2021). Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Radiology, 51(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04803-0spa
dc.relation.referencesACR-AAPM-SPR General Diagnostic Radiology Practice Parameters. Practice parameter for diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses in medical x-ray imaging. Disponible en: ACR–AAPM–SPR Practice Parameter for Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses in Medical X-Ray Imagingspa
dc.relation.referencesAlzen, G., & Benz-Bohm, G. (2011). Kinderradiologie - besonderheiten des strahlenschutzes. In Deutsches Arzteblatt (Vol. 108, Issue 24, pp. 407–414). https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2011.0407spa
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Association of Physycists in Medicine (AAPM). Size-specifric dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations: the report of AAPM Task Group 204. htps://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204. Pdf. Published 2011. Accessed October 9, 2021spa
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicine. (AAPM). (s.f). CT Scan Protocols - The Alliance for Quality Computed Tomography. Disponible en: https://www.aapm.org/pubs/CTProtocolsspa
dc.relation.referencesAmis, E. S., & Butler, P. F. (2010). ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: Three years later. In Journal of the American College of Radiology (Vol. 7, Issue 11, pp. 865–870). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.04.006spa
dc.relation.referencesAmurao, M., King, S. H., Becker, M. D., Sheetz, M. A., Franz, S. C., Rubinstein, A. E., Gress, D. A., & Creech, W. (n.d.). ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources ACR-AAPM Radiation Safety Officer Resources iii.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrady, A. P., Beets-Tan, R. G., Brkljačić, B., Catalano, C., Rockall, A., & Fuchsjäger, M. (2022). The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights into Imaging, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01241-4spa
dc.relation.referencesBos, D., Zensen, S., Opitz, M. K., Haubold, J., Nassenstein, K., Kinner, S., Schweiger, B., Forsting, M., Wetter, A., & Guberina, N. (2022). Diagnostic reference levels for chest computed tomography in children as a function of patient size. Pediatric Radiology, 52(8), 1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05340- 8spa
dc.relation.referencesCadavid Álvarez, L. M., Poveda Bolaño, J. F., Palacio Montoya, M. F., González Londoño, J. F., & Saldarriaga Arango, M. F. (2020). Niveles de referencia de dosis de radiación para la toma de imágenes en pediatría. Rev. Colomb. Radiol., 31(2), 5328–5334.spa
dc.relation.referencesCélier, D., Roch, P., Etard, C., Ducou Le Pointe, H., & Brisse, H. J. (2020). Multicentre survey on patient dose in paediatric imaging and proposal for updated diagnostic reference levels for France. Part 1: computed tomography. European Radiology, 30(2), 1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06405-3spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Crop, A., Smeets, P., Hoof, T.V., et al., 2015. Correlation of clinical and physical technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction. BMC Med. Imag. 15, 32spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Jesus FM, Magalhães LAG, Kodlulovich S. Paediatric CT exposure practice in the county of Rio de Janeiro: the need to establish diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. noviembre de 2016;171(3):389-97spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commission. Radiation Protection No 185 - European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Paediatric Imaging [Internet]. 2018 [citado 26 de enero de 2021]. Disponible en: http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp content/uploads/2018/09/rp_185.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFood and drug administration (FDA). White paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. 2018. Disponible en: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging | FDAspa
dc.relation.referencesFrush DP, Soden B, Frush KS, Lowry C. Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):721- 6. Doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780721. PMID: 11856705.spa
dc.relation.referencesGranata, C., Sorantin, E., Seuri, R., & Owens, C. M. (2019). European Society of Paediatric Radiology Computed Tomography and Dose Task Force: European guidelines on diagnostic reference levels for paediatric imaging. Pediatric Radiology, 49(5), 702–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04346-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04346-zspa
dc.relation.referencesGreenwood, T. J., Lopez-Costa, R. I., Rhoades, P. D., Ramírez-Giraldo, J. C., Starr, M., Street, M., Duncan, J., & McKinstry, R. C. (2015). CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: A multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics, 35(5), 1539–1554. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140267spa
dc.relation.referencesGoske, M. J., Charkot, E., Herrmann, T., John, S. D., Mills, T. T., Morrison, G., & Smith, S. N. (2011). Image Gently: Challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatric Radiology, 41(5), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1957-3spa
dc.relation.referencesHall EJ. Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol Roentgenol Nucl Med Ultrasound CT MRI. 1 de octubre de 2002;32(10):700-700-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0774-8spa
dc.relation.references. Harding K, Thomson WH. Radiological protection and safety in medicine - ICRP 73. Eur J Nucl Med. octubre de 1997;24(10):1207spa
dc.relation.referencesHuda, W. (2004). Assessment of the problem: Pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatric Radiology, 34(SUPPL. 3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1267-8spa
dc.relation.referencesIAEA Safety standards and related publications. (n.d.). http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/spa
dc.relation.referencesIEC, 2012. Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 2-44: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of X-ray Equipment for Computed Tomography. IEC 60601-2-44, ed 3.1. IEC, Geneva.spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), 1995. Medical imaging – the assessment of image quality. Report 54. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MDspa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU. 2012 Apr;12(1):1-149. doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndt007. PMID: 24158924.spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1977. Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 26. Ann. ICRP 1(3): 1 - 53.spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1990. Recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21:1–120 Ann 1991;21(1-3):1-201. PMID: 2053748spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1996. Harding K, Thomson WH. Radiological protection and safety in medicine - ICRP Publication 73. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997 Oct;24(10):1207-9. PMID: 9323259.spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 2007a. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. Doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. PMID: 18082557.spa
dc.relation.referencesICRP, Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K, Sanchez R. ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP. 2013 Apr;42(2):1-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001. Erratum in: Ann ICRP. 2020 Oct 5;146645320966413. Erratum in: Ann ICRP. 2021 Mar 25;1466453211000254. PMID: 23218172.spa
dc.relation.referencesICRP, Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, Ortiz-López P, Mattsson S, Padovani R, Rogers A; Authors on behalf of ICRP. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1- 144. Doi: 10.1177/0146645317717209. PMID: 29065694.spa
dc.relation.referencesIPSM/NRPB/CoR, 1992. National Protocol for Patient Dose Measurements in Diagnostic Radiology. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton. Disponible en: Diagnostic radiology: national protocol for patient dose measurements - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Radiation Protection Association (IRPA). IRPA Guiding Principles on radiation protection culture. 2014. Disponible en: IRPA - INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION. IRPA Guiding Principles on RP Culture (2014).pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesIntegrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/).spa
dc.relation.referencesJärvinen H, Seuri R, Kortesniemi M, Lajunen A, Hallinen E, Savikurki-Heikkilä P, et al. Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT: a new approach with proposed values. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. julio de 2015;165(1-4):86- 90. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv044spa
dc.relation.referencesKanal, K. M., Butler, P. F., Chatfield, M. B., Wells, J., Samei, E., Simanowith, M., Golden, D., Gress, D. A., Burleson, J., Sensakovic, W. F., Strauss, K. J., & Frush, D. (2022). U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Pediatric CT Examinations. Radiology, 302(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021211241spa
dc.relation.referencesKleinman, P.L., Strauss, K.J., Zurakowski, D., Buckley, K.S., Taylor, G.A., 2010. Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 194, 1611–1619.spa
dc.relation.referencesKalender W.A, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz W.A. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: 323-328spa
dc.relation.referencesLeung RS. Radiation protection of the child from diagnostic imaging. Curr Pediatr Rev.1 de enero de 2015;11(4):235-235-42spa
dc.relation.referencesLinet, M. S., Kim, K. P., & Rajaraman, P. (2009). Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: Epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatric Radiology, 39(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1026-3spa
dc.relation.referencesMahesh M. Update on radiation safety and dose reduction in pediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol. 1 de septiembre de 2015;45 Suppl 3:S370-S370spa
dc.relation.referencesMcnitt-Gray, M. F., & Morin, R. L. (2004). Selecting a New Computed Tomography Scanner: Things to Consider. www.acr.org/dyna/?docdepartments/stand_spa
dc.relation.referencesPearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, LeeC, Kim KP, Howe NL; Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancer. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505.doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0.Epub 2012 Jun 7. PMID: 22681860; PMCID: PMC2418594.spa
dc.relation.referencesPloussi, A., & Efstathopoulos, E. P. (2016). Importance of establishing radiation protection culture in Radiology Department. World Journal of Radiology, 8(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.142spa
dc.relation.referencesRehani, M. M., Szczykutowicz, T. P., & Zaidi, H. (2020). CT is still not a low-dose imaging modality. In Medical Physics (Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 293–296). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14000spa
dc.relation.referencesRehani, M. M., & Brady, Z. (2021). Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging special feature: editorial Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial 1.spa
dc.relation.referencesSamei, E., Christianson, O., 2014. Dose index analytics: more than a low number. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 11, 832–834.spa
dc.relation.referencesSatharasinghe, D. M., Jeyasugiththan, J., Wanninayake, W. M. N. M. B., & Pallewatte, A. S. (2021). Paediatric diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography: A systematic review. In Journal of Radiological Protection (Vol. 41, Issue 1, pp. R1–R27). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361- 6498/abd840spa
dc.relation.referencesSeidenbusch, M.C., Schneider, K., 2014. Conversion coefficients for determining organ doses in paediatric pelvis and hip joint radiography. Pediatr. Radiol. 44, 1110– 1123.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure--are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys. 2009 Jul;97(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000356672.44380.b7. PMID: 19509507spa
dc.relation.referencesSiciliano, R. (2017). Radiological examinations in pediatric age. Annali Di Igiene Medicina Preventiva e Di Comunita, 29(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2017.2140spa
dc.relation.referencesSiegel, M. J., Mhlanga, J. C., Salter, A., & Ramirez-Giraldo, J. C. (2021). Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between contrast-enhanced single- and dual energy abdominopelvic computed tomography in children as a function of patient size. Pediatric Radiology, 51(11), 2000–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021- 05127-3spa
dc.relation.referencesSlovis TL. CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):39-41. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790039. PMID: 12076901.spa
dc.relation.referencesSlovis TL, Berdon WE. The ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:217–317spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, K. J., Racadio, J. M., Johnson, N., Patel, M., & Nachabe, R. A. (2015). Estimates of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric peripheral and abdominal fluoroscopically guided procedures. American Journal of Roentgenology, 204(6), W713–W719. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13630spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss KJ, Somasundaram E, Sengupta D, Marin JR, Brady SL. Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT: Comparison of Pediatric versus Adult Imaging Facilities. Radiology 2019;291(1)spa
dc.relation.referencesVassileva, J., Rehani, M., Kostova-Lefterova, D., et al., 2015. A study to establish international diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 165, 70–80.spa
dc.relation.referencesVawda, Z., Pitcher, R., Akudugu, J., & Groenewald, W. (2015). Diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography. South African Journal of Radiology, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v19i2.846spa
dc.relation.referencesWatson, D.J., Coakley, K.S., 2010. Paediatric CT reference doses based on weight and CT dosimetry phantom size: local experience using a 64-slice CT scanner. Pediatr. Radiol. 40, 693–703spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados al autor, 2022spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::618 - Ginecología, obstetricia, pediatría, geriatríaspa
dc.subject.decsTomografía Computarizada por Rayos Xspa
dc.subject.decsTomography, X-Ray Computedeng
dc.subject.decsNiveles de Referencia para Diagnósticospa
dc.subject.decsDiagnostic Reference Levelseng
dc.subject.proposalTomografía computarizadaspa
dc.subject.proposalDiagnósticospa
dc.subject.proposalPediatríaspa
dc.subject.proposalComputed tomographyeng
dc.subject.proposalDiagnosiseng
dc.subject.proposalPediatricseng
dc.titleNiveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotáspa
dc.title.translatedReference levels of diagnosis in computed tomography in a high complexity pediatric hospital of the city of Bogotáeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médicaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.awardtitleNiveles de referencia de diagnóstico en tomografía computarizada en un hospital pediátrico de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Bogotáspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
43984393.2022.pdf
Tamaño:
3.08 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado de Especialidad en Radiología pediátrica

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: