La contribución de la ambidestreza en la generación de innovación desde la perspectiva de la trayectoria tecnológica (incremental y radical) en empresas de base tecnológica en Caldas, Colombia.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorOsorio Londoño, Andrés Alberto
dc.contributor.advisorGIRALDO VELEZ, LAURA PATRICIA
dc.contributor.authorRojas Restrepo, Daniel Eduardo
dc.contributor.orcidRojas Restrepo, Daniel Eduardo [0009000058417448]spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T14:54:19Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T14:54:19Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptiongraficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractEste estudio examina la contribución generada por la ambidestreza en los resultados de innovación, desde la perspectiva de la trayectoria tecnológica (innovación incremental y radical), que alcanzan las empresas de base tecnológica (NTBFs por sus siglas en inglés), del departamento de Caldas, Colombia. Este vínculo no ha sido abordado en este tipo de empresas, dado que los estudios previos encontrados en la literatura han sido enfocados a grandes industrias y no a pequeñas o medianas del sector tecnológico. En esta investigación se utilizó una metodología cualitativa de análisis de contenido con información recolectada de 3 empresas del departamento de Caldas, cuyas propuestas de valor están basadas en el uso de la tecnología desde el punto de vista de la innovación. Los resultados muestran que la ambidestreza, a través de las capacidades de explotación y exploración, impulsa los resultados de innovación tanto incrementales como radicales y que, a su vez, representan estrategias complementarias que no se excluyen entre sí para motivar la innovación en las organizaciones. Adicionalmente, en términos de administración, estos resultados brindan una alternativa para los altos directivos que buscan implementar estrategias que mejoren sus resultados de innovación en el corto y largo plazo para sobrevivir ante la incertidumbre del mercado (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThis study seeks to examine the contribution generated by ambidexterity in innovation performance, from the perspective of the technological trajectory (incremental and radical innovation), achieved by new technology-based firms (NTBFs), in the department of Caldas, Colombia. This relationship has not been studied in this type of companies, the previous studies found in the literature have been focused on large industries and not on small or medium-sized companies in the technological sector. It was developed using the qualitative methodology of content analysis with information collected from 3 companies in the department of Caldas whose value propositions are based on technology. The results show that ambidexterity through exploitation and exploration capabilities, drives incremental and radical innovation results respectively, also they are complementary strategies and are not mutually exclusive to motivate innovation in organizations. Additionally, in terms of management, these results provide an alternative for top managers seeking to implement strategies that improve their innovation performance in the short and long term to survive in market uncertainty.eng
dc.description.curricularareaAdministración.Sede Manizalesspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Administraciónspa
dc.description.methodsMetología de tipo Cualitativa con entrevistas semiestructuradas, se utilizó la técnica de análisis de contenido.spa
dc.description.researchareaEstrategia empresarial y competitividadspa
dc.format.extent127 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85805
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizalesspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Administraciónspa
dc.publisher.placeManizales, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programManizales - Administración - Maestría en Administraciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAcevedo, J., & Díaz-Molina, I. (2019). Exploration and exploitation in latin american firms: The determinants of organizational ambidexterity and the country effect. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 14(4), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242019000400006spa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta-Prado, J. C. (2020). Relationship between organizational climate and innovation capability in new technology-based firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020028spa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta-Prado, J. C., & Tafur-Mendoza, A. A. (2019). Organizational ambidexterity, intangible assets and economic results in new technology-based firms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning, ICICKM, 2019-December, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.34190/IKM.19.056spa
dc.relation.referencesAlexander, L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2014). TEAMS IN PURSUIT OF RADICAL INNOVATION: A GOAL ORIENTATION PERSPECTIVE. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 39(4), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0044spa
dc.relation.referencesAlmahendra, R., & Ambos, B. (2015). EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION: A 20-YEAR REVIEW OF EVOLUTION AND RECONCEPTUALISATION. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615500085spa
dc.relation.referencesAloini, D., & Martini, A. (2013). Exploring the exploratory search for innovation: a structural equation modelling test for practices and performance. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 61(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2013.050242spa
dc.relation.referencesAndriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 20(4), 696-717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406spa
dc.relation.referencesAnsari, S. (Shaz), & Krop, P. (2012). Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics. RESEARCH POLICY, 41(8), 1357-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.024spa
dc.relation.referencesArdito, L., Peruffo, E., & Natalicchio, A. (2019). The relationships between the internationalization of alliance portfolio diversity, individual incentives, and innovation ambidexterity: A microfoundational approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119714spa
dc.relation.referencesAtuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61-63. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61spa
dc.relation.referencesBaum, J., Li, S., & Usher, J. (2000). Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 766-801. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667019spa
dc.relation.referencesBBC News. (2019, octubre 11). Las 10 empresas que han transformado la forma de hacer negocios en la última década (y cuál fue su fórmula para el éxito) - BBC News Mundo. BBC News Mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-49964051spa
dc.relation.referencesBell, E., Harley, B., & Bryman, A. (2022). Business research methods. En Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/business-research-methods-9780198869443spa
dc.relation.referencesBenavides, A. F. C., Ehrenhard, M., De Visser, M., & Weerd-Nederhof, P. C. (2022). Interfirm cooperatives enabling organizational ambidexterity, a CASE study of the printing industry in Colombia. THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 64(5, SI), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22283spa
dc.relation.referencesBenner, M., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3094913spa
dc.relation.referencesBenner, M., & Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096spa
dc.relation.referencesBerends, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Kirschbaum, R. (2007). Knowledge management challenges in new business development: Case study observations. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 24(4), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesBernal, O.-V., & Toro-Jaramilo, I.-D. (2019). Organizational Ambidexterity: Exploration and Exploitation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(05). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877019500330spa
dc.relation.referencesBolinao, E. N. (2008). A framework for analysis of ambidexterity and performance in small-to-medium-sized firms. DLSU Business and Economics Review, 17(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.3860/ber.v17i1.39spa
dc.relation.referencesBožič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101578spa
dc.relation.referencesBrasil, V. C., Salerno, M. S., Eggers, J. P., & Gomes, L. A. D. V. (2021). Boosting Radical Innovation Using Ambidextrous Portfolio Management: To manage radical innovation effectively, companies can build ambidextrous portfolio management systems and adopt a multilevel organizational approach. Research Technology Management, 64(5), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2021.1947605spa
dc.relation.referencesBree, P. (2022). Los rasgos de las empresas más innovadoras. El Español. https://www.elespanol.com/invertia/disruptores-innovadores/opinion/20220921/rasgos-empresas-innovadoras/704809519_13.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesBryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (Third Edition). OUP Oxford. https://books.google.com/books/about/Business_Research_Methods_3e.html?hl=es&id=YnCcAQAAQBAJspa
dc.relation.referencesCatalán, C. (2020). «Las empresas deben desarrollar la ambidestreza». Navarra Capital. https://navarracapital.es/las-empresas-deben-desarrollar-la-ambidestreza/spa
dc.relation.referencesCaypa, G. (2017). Relación entre la innovación y el performance en empresas de base tecnológica (ebts) del sector de tecnologías de información en Colombia. http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59330spa
dc.relation.referencesCembrero, D., & Sáenz, J. (2018). Performance outcomes of interaction, balance, and alignment between exploration and exploitation in the technological innovation domain. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 15(1), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.088464spa
dc.relation.referencesCentoni, L. (2023, enero 17). 4 tendencias tecnológicas que marcarán 2023. Amcham Colombia. https://amchamcolombia.co/es/noticias-afiliados/4-tendencias-tecnologicas-que-marcaran-2023/spa
dc.relation.referencesConsuegra, C. (2022, enero 17). La necesidad de Innovar y adaptarse en las empresas. Punto Estratégico. https://puntoestrategico.com.co/2022/01/17/la-necesidad-de-innovar-y-adaptarse-en-las-empresas/spa
dc.relation.referencesCPAN. (2023). Empresas de Base Tecnológica | CPAN - Centro Nacional de Física de Partículas, Astropartículas y Nuclear. Centro Nacional de Física de Partículas, Astropartículas y Nuclear. https://www.i-cpan.es/es/content/empresas-de-base-tecnol%C3%B3gicaspa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. En Sage Publications, Inc. (Vol. 4, Número 1).spa
dc.relation.referencesCubero, J. N., Gbadegeshin, S. A., & Segura, C. C. (2020). Commercialization process of disruptive innovations in corporate ventures and spinoff companies: A comparison. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(2), 621-634. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050278spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N. (Tek), & Dimov, D. (2013). Shedding new light on the relationship between contextual ambidexterity and firm performance: An investigation of internal contingencies. TECHNOVATION, 33(4-5), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.12.002spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Mello, A. M., & Marx, R. (2013). A contribution to organizational design for innovation in the brazilian petrochemical industry [Contribuição aos critérios de projeto organizacional para inovação na indústria petroquímica brasileira]. Gestao e Producao, 20(2), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-530x2013000200009spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Visser, M., de Weerd-Nederhof, P., Faems, D., Song, M., van Looy, B., & Visscher, K. (2010). Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance. Technovation, 30(5-6), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.008spa
dc.relation.referencesDewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422, 32(11), 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.32.11.1422spa
dc.relation.referencesDonada, C., Mothe, C., & Alegre, J. (2021). Managing skunkworks to achieve ambidexterity: The Robinson Crusoe effect. European Management Journal, 39(2), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.07.008spa
dc.relation.referencesDurisin, B., & Todorova, G. (2012). A study of the performativity of the ambidextrous organizations theory: Neither lost in nor lost before translation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00981.xspa
dc.relation.referencesEriksson, P. E., & Szentes, H. (2017). Managing the tensions between exploration and exploitation in large construction projects. Construction Innovation, 17(4), 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-05-2016-0032spa
dc.relation.referencesEscorcia-Caballero, J. P., Chams-Anturi, O., & Moreno-Luzon, M. D. (2022). The effect of ambidexterity on market performance: a new perspective and measurement from the dynamic capability framework. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2100986spa
dc.relation.referencesEspeso, D. (2020). Cómo alcanzar el éxito profesional en las empresas ambidiestras | Desarrollo de Carrera. Expansión. https://www.expansion.com/expansion-empleo/desarrollo-de-carrera/2020/03/10/5e67d900468aeba5018b4638.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesEUDE Business School. (2020, enero 3). ¿Cómo satisfacer a los consumidores exigentes? https://www.eude.es/blog/consumidores-exigentes-eude/spa
dc.relation.referencesGassmann, O., Widenmayer, B., & Zeschky, M. (2012). Implementing radical innovation in the business: the role of transition modes in large firms. R & D MANAGEMENT, 42(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00670.xspa
dc.relation.referencesGatignon, H., Tushman, M. L., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. (2002). A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1103.174, 48(9), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.48.9.1103.174spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573spa
dc.relation.referencesGrant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6486.2004.00421.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesGuillén, T. (2018, febrero 15). Pensar estratégicamente - Diversificación e inversión en nuevos negocios innovadores - Blogs Expansión.com. Expansión. https://www.expansion.com/blogs/pensar-estrategicamente/2018/02/15/diversificacion-e-inversion-en-nuevos.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesGupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026spa
dc.relation.referencesGürkan, G., & Tükeltürk, Ş. (2017). Strategies for innovative organization structure: Innovative culture and open innovation. Contributions to Management Science, 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44591-5_13spa
dc.relation.referencesGurtner, S., & Reinhardt, R. (2016). Ambidextrous Idea Generation—Antecedents and Outcomes*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12353spa
dc.relation.referencesGüttel, W. H., Konlechner, S. W., & Trede, J. K. (2015). Standardized individuality versus individualized standardization: the role of the context in structurally ambidextrous organizations. Review of Managerial Science, 9(2), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0156-2spa
dc.relation.referencesHansen, E. G., Wicki, S., & Schaltegger, S. (2022). SUSTAINABILITY-ORIENTED TECHNOLOGY EXPLORATION: MANAGERIAL VALUES, AMBIDEXTROUS DESIGN, AND SEPARATION DRIFT. International Journal of Innovation Management, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622400047spa
dc.relation.referencesHarmancioglu, N., Sääksjärvi, M., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Cannibalize and combine? The impact of ambidextrous innovation on organizational outcomes under market competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.005spa
dc.relation.referencesHe, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Las rutas Cuantitativa Cualitativa y Mixta. En Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mc Graw Hill Education. shorturl.at/mwS39spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmqvist, M. (2003). A Dynamic Model of Intra-and Interorganizational Learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001684, 24(1), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001684spa
dc.relation.referencesHorchani, S. C., & Zouaoui, M. (2021). ENVIRONMENT TURBULENCE EFFECT on the DYNAMICS of INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL ACCUMULATION and AMBIDEXTROUS INNOVATION. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500584spa
dc.relation.referencesIGI Global. (2023). What is Technology-Based Company | IGI Global. IGI Global Publisher of Timely Knowlegde. https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/technology-based-company/76863spa
dc.relation.referencesIngram, A. E., Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. (2008). Innovation tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Toward a collective paradox frame. Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2008.33649824spa
dc.relation.referencesJiang, Y., Asante, D., Zhang, J., & Ampaw, E. M. (2021). The influence of ambidextrous leadership on the employee innovative behavior: an empirical study based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02233-1spa
dc.relation.referencesJurado-Salgado, J. I., Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., & Osorio-Londoño, A. A. (2022). Incidence of exploration and exploitation capabilities in innovation: the role of cultural factors. Innovation: Organization and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2022.2055042spa
dc.relation.referencesKang, S., & Hwang, J. (2019). An investigation into the performance of an ambidextrously balanced innovator and its relatedness to open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5020023spa
dc.relation.referencesKelley, D. (2009). Adaptation and Organizational Connectedness in Corporate Radical Innovation Programs*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5885.2009.00676.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesKhanagha, S., Zadeh, M. T. R., & Mihalache Oli R. and Volberda, H. W. (2018). Embracing Bewilderment: Responding to Technological Disruption in Heterogeneous Market Environments. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 55(7, SI), 1079-1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12348spa
dc.relation.referencesKortmann, S. (2015). The Mediating Role of Strategic Orientations on the Relationship between Ambidexterity-Oriented Decisions and Innovative Ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12151spa
dc.relation.referencesLennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, 38(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002spa
dc.relation.referencesLevinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Journal, 14, 95-112.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, P. P., Liu, H., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Exploration-Exploitation Duality with Both Tradeoff and Synergy: The Curvilinear Interaction Effects of Learning Modes on Innovation Types. Management and Organization Review, 157(5). https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.49spa
dc.relation.referencesLin, H.-E., McDonough III, E. F., Lin, S.-J., & Lin, C. Y.-Y. (2013). Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: The role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.xspa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, C., & Xiao, H.-L. (2022). The Impact of Ambidextrous Innovation Human Capital on the Technological Innovation Efficiency and Stage Efficiency of Big Data Enterprises. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416636spa
dc.relation.referencesLubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712spa
dc.relation.referencesLukito-Budi, A. S., Manik, H. F. G. G., & Indarti, N. (2023). Reorienting the organisational strategy of SMEs during the COVID-19 crisis: can entrepreneurial orientation help? Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2021-0156spa
dc.relation.referencesMarch, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71spa
dc.relation.referencesMarín-Idárraga, D. A., Hurtado González, J. M., & Cabello Medina, C. (2016). The Antecedents of Exploitation-Exploration and Their Relationship with Innovation: A Study of Managers’ Cognitive Maps. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12139spa
dc.relation.referencesMenguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 39(5, SI), 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.08.004spa
dc.relation.referencesMingyang, Z., Yuli, Z., & Cuojun, Z. (2020). Network autonomy, ambidextrous innovation strategy and business model innovation: The moderation role of coordination flexibility. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 34(6), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2020.06.007spa
dc.relation.referencesMinTIC. (2020, noviembre 13). 27 empresas digitales apoyadas por el Ministerio TIC hacen parte de las 100 mejores startups de Colombia según Forbes. https://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/inicio/Sala-de-prensa/Noticias/159504:27-empresas-digitales-apoyadas-por-el-Ministerio-TIC-hacen-parte-de-las-100-mejores-startups-de-Colombia-segun-Forbesspa
dc.relation.referencesMoreno-Luzon, M. D., Gil-Marques, M., & Arteaga, F. (2014). Driving organisational ambidexterity through process management. The key role of cultural change. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 25(9-10), 1026-1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.776768spa
dc.relation.referencesMuhammad, F., Ikram, A., Jafri, S. K., & Naveed, K. (2021). Product innovations through ambidextrous organizational culture with mediating effect of contextual ambidexterity: An empirical study of it and telecom firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010009spa
dc.relation.referencesNaciones Unidas. (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. www.issuu.com/publicacionescepal/stacksspa
dc.relation.referencesNapier, N. P., Mathiassen, L., & Robey, D. (2011). Building contextual ambidexterity in a software company to improve firm-level coordination. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(6), 674-690. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.32spa
dc.relation.referencesNiewöhner, N., Asmar, L., Röltgen, D., Kühn, A., & Dumitrescu, R. (2020). The impact of the 4th industrial revolution on the design fields of innovation management. Procedia CIRP, 91, 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.149spa
dc.relation.referencesNigg-Stock, A., Bayrle, N., & Brecht, L. (2023). Drivers of exploitative and explorative innovation efficiency. Digital Business, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIGBUS.2023.100062spa
dc.relation.referencesO’ Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future Academy of Management Perspectives (in press). Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Connor, G. C., & DeMartino, R. (2006). Organizing for radical innovation: An exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(6), 475-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00219.xspa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-enspa
dc.relation.referencesO’Reilly, C., & Binns, A. J. M. (2019). The Three Stages of Disruptive Innovation: Idea Generation, Incubation, and Scaling. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 61(3), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841878spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The Ambidextrous Organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74-81+140. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-1842535392&partnerID=40&md5=39cc2da1f0593b53aa0529a63d4c01e1spa
dc.relation.referencesPaliokaite, A., & Pačesa, N. (2015). The relationship between organisational foresight and organisational ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.004spa
dc.relation.referencesPara-González, L., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Martínez-Lorente, Á. R. (2021). Does EFQM enhance learning and innovation? Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 33(7-8), 727-751. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1890016spa
dc.relation.referencesParedes, K. M. B., Olander Roese, M., & Johansson, U. (2023). Towards retail innovation and ambidexterity: insights from a Swedish retailer. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 51(13), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2022-0094spa
dc.relation.referencesPiao, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). How exploitation impedes and impels exploration: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1431-1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2402spa
dc.relation.referencesPrange, C., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2009). The Role of Ambidexterity in Marketing Strategy Implementation: Resolving the Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma. Business Research, 2(2), 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342712/METRICSspa
dc.relation.referencesRevista Mercado. (2022, marzo 18). Los consumidores están cada vez más exigentes. ¿Cómo cumplir? https://mercado.com.ar/management-marketing/los-consumidores-estan-cada-vez-mas-exigentes-como-cumplir/spa
dc.relation.referencesRöglinger, M., Schwindenhammer, L., & Stelzl, K. (2018). How to put organizational ambidexterity into practice – Towards a maturity model. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 329, 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98651-7_12spa
dc.relation.referencesRosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.160spa
dc.relation.referencesSandstrom, C., Berglund, H., & Magnusson, M. (2014). Symmetric Assumptions in the Theory of Disruptive Innovation: Theoretical and Managerial Implications. CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 23(4), 472-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12092spa
dc.relation.referencesSolís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001spa
dc.relation.referencesSollosy, M., Guidice, R. M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2019). Miles and Snow’s strategic typology redux through the lens of ambidexterity. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(4), 925-946. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2018-1433spa
dc.relation.referencesStoiber, K., Matzler, K., & Hautz, J. (2022). Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00589-7spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, A., & Greve, H. (2006). Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams. Academy of Management Journal. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159795spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148spa
dc.relation.referencesToro, P. (2023, febrero 15). Ecosistema de emprendimientoe innovación de Caldas. Eureka. https://eureka.umanizales.edu.co/ecosistema-de-emprendimientoe-innovacion-de-caldas/spa
dc.relation.referencesTurner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 15(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.xspa
dc.relation.referencesTushman, M., Smith, W. K., Wood, R. C., Westerman, G., & O’Reilly, C. (2010). Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1331-1366. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq040spa
dc.relation.referencesVermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning Through Acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069364spa
dc.relation.referencesVesal, M., Siahtiri, V., & O’Cass, A. (2022). Do senior managers hold the keys to unlock innovation and environmental sustainability? Industrial Marketing Management, 103, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.03.010spa
dc.relation.referencesVettorello, M., Eisenbart, B., & Ranscombe, C. (2020). PARADOXICAL TENSION: BALANCING CONTEXTUAL AMBIDEXTERITY. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 1385-1394. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.74spa
dc.relation.referencesVoss, G., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. (2008). The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmental Threat on Product Exploration and Exploitation on JSTOR. The Academy of Management Journal, 5, 147-164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159499spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, C., Chin, T., & Lin, J. (2020). Openness and firm innovation performance: the moderating effect of ambidextrous knowledge search strategy. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 24(2), 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2019-0198spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, D. (2019). Association between technological innovation and firm performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The moderating effect of environmental factors. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2018-0049spa
dc.relation.referencesXu, S., Wu, F., & Cavusgil, E. (2013). Complements or substitutes? Internal technological strength, competitor alliance participation, and innovation development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12014spa
dc.relation.referencesYalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., & Griffith, D. A. (2007). An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.4.63, 15(4), 63-93. https://doi.org/10.1509/JIMK.15.4.63spa
dc.relation.referencesZi-Lin, H., & Poh-Kam, W. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 484-494. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034750spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.subject.ddc670 - Manufacturaspa
dc.subject.proposalAmbidestrezaspa
dc.subject.proposalAmbidexterityeng
dc.subject.proposalExplotaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalExploitationeng
dc.subject.proposalExploraciónspa
dc.subject.proposalExplorationeng
dc.subject.proposalInnovación Incrementalspa
dc.subject.proposalIncremental innovationeng
dc.subject.proposalInnovación radicalspa
dc.subject.proposalRadical innovationeng
dc.subject.proposalEmpresas de base tecnológicaspa
dc.subject.proposalTechnology-based firmseng
dc.subject.unescoDifusión de tecnologías
dc.subject.unescoDiffusion of technology
dc.titleLa contribución de la ambidestreza en la generación de innovación desde la perspectiva de la trayectoria tecnológica (incremental y radical) en empresas de base tecnológica en Caldas, Colombia.spa
dc.title.translatedThe contribution of ambidexterity in the generation of innovation from the perspective of the technological trajectory (incremental and radical) in technology-based companies in Caldas, Colombia.eng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentBibliotecariosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestrosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1053837093.2024.pdf
Tamaño:
966.93 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Administración
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Administración