Gobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeteros

dc.contributor.advisorVillegas Palacio, Clara Inés
dc.contributor.authorMejía Durango, Diana Patricia
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001643456spa
dc.contributor.orcidMejía Durango, Diana Patricia [0000-0001-8267-3185]spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-29T16:02:45Z
dc.date.available2024-05-29T16:02:45Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, mapasspa
dc.description.abstractLos paisajes productivos cafeteros (PPC) constituyen una fuente de alimento, de identidad cultural, vida social, valor estético y vida rural. Sin embargo, las complejas dinámicas en las que se encuentra inmersa la caficultura han generado una gran presión sobre los PPC, que compromete la provisión potencial de otras contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas (NCP) y socavan las bases naturales de la misma caficultura. La intensificación de la caficultura contribuye a la creación de paisajes con una alta provisión de café a expensas de otras NCP (trade-off) mientras que, otras alternativas productivas pueden favorecer la provisión de diversas contribuciones. Estas alternativas productivas se viabilizan, entre otras formas, a través de la gobernanza dado que esta última puede orientar, por medio de las intervenciones de gobernanza, las decisiones de gestión agrícola hacia determinados modelos de producción. Con el propósito de contribuir al entendimiento de la incidencia de los modos de gobernanza en las prácticas producción agrícola y, por tanto, en la provisión potencial de otras NCP en un sistema-socio-ecológico (SSE) cafetero, en esta tesis se propuso, mediante una investigación de enfoque cualitativo, analizar la tipología de gobernanza y su incidencia sobre las prácticas y las contribuciones de la naturaleza. Para esto, se hizo necesario determinar los modos de gobernanza, las prácticas agrícolas adoptadas, las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas que son percibidas y las condiciones marco para la caficultura que influyen en las decisiones de adopción. Los hallazgos son indicativos de la coexistencia de cuatro modos de gobernanza a los cuales se les puede atribuir diversas intervenciones de gobernanza dirigidas a incidir sobre el comportamiento del caficultor. Parece existir un predominio de intervenciones atribuidas a la auto-gobernanza, que resalta la participación del mercado; y una tendencia orientada a la adopción de prácticas agrícolas intensivas. Los resultados revelan la complejidad de interacciones de condiciones marco para la caficultura que pueden influir en la toma de decisiones de los caficultores. (Tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractCoffee productive landscapes (CPP) constitute a source of food, cultural identity, social life, aesthetic value and rural life. However, the complex dynamics in which coffee farming is immersed have generated great pressure on PPC, which compromise the potential provision of other nature's contributions to people (NCP) and undermine the natural foundations of coffee farming itself. The intensification of coffee growing contributes to the creation of landscapes with a high supply of coffee at the expense of other NCP (trade-off), while other productive alternatives can favor the provision of various contributions. These productive alternatives are made viable, among other ways, through governance since the latter can guide, through governance interventions, agricultural management decisions towards certain production models. With the purpose of contributing to the understanding of the impact of governance modes on agricultural production practices and, therefore, on the potential provision of other NCP in a coffee socio-ecological system (SES), this thesis proposed, through qualitative research, analyze the typology of governance and its impact on the practices and NCP. For this, it became necessary to determine the modes of governance, the agricultural practices adopted, the nature's contributions to people that are perceived and the frame conditions for coffee growing that influence adoption decisions. The findings are indicative of the coexistence of four modes of governance to which various governance interventions aimed at influencing coffee grower behavior can be attributed. There seems to be a predominance of interventions attributed to self-governance, which highlights market participation; and a trend towards the adoption of intensive agricultural practices. Likewise, the results reveal the complexity of interactions of framework conditions for coffee growing that can influence the decision making of coffee growers.eng
dc.description.curricularareaMedio Ambiente.Sede Medellínspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollospa
dc.description.methodsLa presente tesis es un investigación cualitativa de corte descriptivo.spa
dc.format.extent150 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86181
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minasspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollospa
dc.relation.indexedLaReferenciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAdejumo, O. O. (2019). Ecological Limits: Implications for Sustainable Human Capital Development. En W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of Climate Change Resilience (pp. 1-22). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71025-9_177-1spa
dc.relation.referencesAkenroye, T. O., Dora, M., Kumar, M., Elbaz, J., Kah, S., & Jebli, F. (2021). A taxonomy of barriers to the adoption of sustainable practices in the coffee farming process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127818spa
dc.relation.referencesAkenroye, T. O., Kumar, M., Dora, M., Ihua, U. B., Mtonga, V. J., & Aju, O. (2022). Evaluating the Barriers to Adopting Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Smallholder Coffee Farming: Implications for Global Value Chains. En R. Frei, S. Ibrahim, & T. Akenroye (Eds.), Africa and Sustainable Global Value Chains (pp. 117-142). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78791-2_6spa
dc.relation.referencesAndersson, E., Nykvist, B., Malinga, R., Jaramillo, F., & Lindborg, R. (2015). A social–ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems. AMBIO, 44(1), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0603-yspa
dc.relation.referencesArango, Á. M., Dossman, M. Á., Muñoz, J., Bueno, L., Arias, J. J., Camargo, J. C., & Maya, J. M. (2020). Los servicios ecosistémicos desde la percepción de los productores de café de Belén de Umbría, Risaralda, Colombia. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 11(2), 81-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesArboleda, O. L., Zabala, H. E., Cueto, E. N., Arboleda, O. L., Zabala, H. E., & Cueto, E. N. (2020). El cooperativismo caficultor en Colombia: El caso de la Cooperativa de Caficultores de Andes en el Departamento de Antioquia, 1927-2015. América Latina en la historia económica, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.18232/alhe.1025spa
dc.relation.referencesArcila, J., Farfan, F., Moreno, A., Salazar, L., & Hincapie, E. (2007). Sistemas de producción de café en Colombia (Primera). FNC-Cenicafé. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/720spa
dc.relation.referencesBallesteros, M. A. (2018). Gobernanza policéntrica en sistemas socio-ecológicos complejos: La gestión de la pesquería del pulpo común (octopus vulgaris) en Galicia [Http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text, Universidade de Vigo]. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=150262spa
dc.relation.referencesBarnum, C. M. (2011). Analyzing the findings. En C. M. Barnum (Ed.), Usability Testing Essentials (pp. 239-275). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375092-1.00008-8spa
dc.relation.referencesBasic. (2018). Coffee, behind the success story. Max Havelaar France, The French Fair Trade Platform, the «Rethinking Value Chains» Collective. https://lebasic.com/en/coffee-the-success-story-hiding-a-crisis/spa
dc.relation.referencesBastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937spa
dc.relation.referencesBenavides, P. (s. f.). Brocarta. Cenicafé. ISSN - 2145-9053spa
dc.relation.referencesBennett, N., & Satterfield, T. (2018). Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis. Conservation Letters, 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600spa
dc.relation.referencesBerrío, J., & Echeverri, L. (2020). Efectos de la variabilidad climática en la producción de café en el municipio de Betania: Alternativas de adaptación para su manejo [Especialización en café]. Universidad de Antioquiaspa
dc.relation.referencesBethwell, C., Sattler, C., & Stachow, U. (2022). An analytical framework to link governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101402spa
dc.relation.referencesBiggs, R., De Vos, A., Preiser, R., Clements, H., Maciejewski, K., & Schlüter, M. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. Routledgespa
dc.relation.referencesBodin, Ö., & Tengö, M. (2012). Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005spa
dc.relation.referencesBrauman, K. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Polasky, S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Brancalion, P. H. S., DeClerck, F., Jacob, U., Mastrangelo, M. E., Nkongolo, N. V., Palang, H., Pérez-Méndez, N., Shannon, L. J., Shrestha, U. B., Strombom, E., & Verma, M. (2020). Global trends in nature’s contributions to people. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(51), 32799-32805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010473117spa
dc.relation.referencesBravo-Monroy, L. (2021). Coffee and Potato Agroecosystems: Social Construction of Spaces as a Concept to Analyse Nature’s Contributions to People. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.607230spa
dc.relation.referencesBravo-Monroy, L., Potts, S. G., & Tzanopoulos, J. (2016). Drivers influencing farmer decisions for adopting organic or conventional coffee management practices. Food Policy, 58, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.003spa
dc.relation.referencesBruley, E., Locatelli, B., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Nature’s contributions to people: Coproducing quality of life from multifunctional landscapes. Ecology and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12031-260112spa
dc.relation.referencesBulitta, B. J., & Duguma, L. A. (2021). The Unexplored Socio-Cultural Benefits of Coffee Plants: Implications for the Sustainable Management of Ethiopia’s Coffee Forests. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073912spa
dc.relation.referencesCastro-Toro, Á., Rivillas-Osorio, C., Serna-Giraldo, C., & Mejía-Mejía, C. (2008). Germinadores de café Construcción, manejo de Rhizoctonia solani y costos. Cenicafé. https://www.cenicafe.org/es/publications/avt0368.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCerdán, C. R., Rebolledo, M. C., Soto, G., Rapidel, B., & Sinclair, F. L. (2012). Local knowledge of impacts of tree cover on ecosystem services in smallholder coffee production systems. Agricultural Systems, 110, 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.014spa
dc.relation.referencesChaves, C. (2005, junio 1). LA CATEGORIZACIÓN UN ASPECTO CRUCIAL EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN CUALITATIVA. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/LA-CATEGORIZACI%C3%93N-UN-ASPECTO-CRUCIAL-EN-LA-Chaves/c5b95ef0d202839e1ffaa070670dc517b8000b22spa
dc.relation.referencesChristie, M., Martín-López, B., Church, A., Siwicka, E., Szymonczyk, P., & Mena Sauterel, J. (2019). Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: Insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1267-1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6spa
dc.relation.referencesClément, R., Tuan, D., Cuong, V., Le Van, B., Trung, H. quôc, & Long, C. T. M. (2023). Transitioning from Monoculture to Mixed Cropping Systems: The Case of Coffee, Pepper, and Fruit Trees in Vietnam. Ecological Economics, 214, 107980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107980spa
dc.relation.referencesComité de cafeteros de Antioquia. (2022, agosto 11). Caficultura de Antioquia. https://fncantioquia.org/caficultura-de-antioquia/spa
dc.relation.referencesCornu, M.-A., Frick, R., Chongtham, I. R., Iocola, I., Canali, S., Colombo, L., Radzikowski, P., Stalenga, J., Viguier, L., Drexler, D., Schneider, A., Stilmant, D., & Vanwindekens, F. M. (2023). Identification and description of relationships between actors involved in crop diversification experiences across Europe. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43(5), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00906-8spa
dc.relation.referencesCorporación Autónoma Regional del Centro de Antioquia [Corantioquia], Durango López, M., Gutiérrez Velásquez, F., Giraldo Duque, Ó. I., & Aguirre Cuartas, A. (Eds.). (2005). Plan de ordenación y manejo cuenca hidrográfica del Río Pedral Municipio de Betania e Hispania. CORANTIOQUIAspa
dc.relation.referencesCumming, G. S., Epstein, G., Anderies, J. M., Apetrei, C. I., Baggio, J., Bodin, Ö., Chawla, S., Clements, H. S., Cox, M., Egli, L., Gurney, G. G., Lubell, M., Magliocca, N., Morrison, T. H., Müller, B., Seppelt, R., Schlüter, M., Unnikrishnan, H., Villamayor-Tomas, S., & Weible, C. M. (2020). Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: A post-Ostrom research agenda. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 44, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Leijster, V., Santos, M. J., Wassen, M. W., Camargo García, J. C., Llorca Fernandez, I., Verkuil, L., Scheper, A., Steenhuis, M., & Verweij, P. A. (2021). Ecosystem services trajectories in coffee agroforestry in Colombia over 40 years. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101246spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Souza, M. C. (2010). Los conceptos estructurantes de la investigación cualitativa. Salud Colectiva, 6(3), 251-261spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Wit, M. P. (2020). Environmental Governance: Complexity and Cooperation in the Implementation of the SDGs. En W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Affordable and Clean Energy (pp. 1-15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_25-1spa
dc.relation.referencesDessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K. M., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., … Zlatanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., … Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359(6373), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en educación médica, 2(7), Article 7spa
dc.relation.referencesDriessen, P. P. J., Dieperink, C., van Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2012). Towards a Conceptual Framework for The Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance – Experiences From The Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1580spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, E. C., Pascual, U., & Mertz, O. (2019). Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people: Negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 38, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001spa
dc.relation.referencesFaith, D. P. (2021). Valuation and Appreciation of Biodiversity: The “Maintenance of Options” Provided by the Variety of Life. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.635670spa
dc.relation.referencesFarhad, S., Gual, M. A., & Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. (2015). Linking governance and ecosystem services: The case of Isla Mayor (Andalusia, Spain). Land Use Policy, 46, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.019spa
dc.relation.referencesFederación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia [FNC]. (2022). Informe del Gerente al 89 Congreso Nacional de Cafeteros 2021 (p. 136). https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/tipos/informes/spa
dc.relation.referencesFederación Nacional de cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.). Chapola. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros. Recuperado 10 de enero de 2024, de https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/glosario/chapola/spa
dc.relation.referencesFederación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-a). Venta de café con entrega inmediata. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-con-entrega-inmediata.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFederación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-b). Ventas de café con precio piso. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-con-precio-piso.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFederación Nacional de Cafeteros [FNC]. (s. f.-c). Ventas de café en depósito. https://federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2019/11/Ventas-de-caf%C3%A9-en-deposito.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFirkowski, C. R., Schwantes, A. M., Fortin, M.-J., & Gonzalez, A. (2021). Monitoring social–ecological networks for biodiversity and ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes. FACETS, 6, 1670-1692. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0114spa
dc.relation.referencesFlay, B., Snyder, F., & Petraitis, J. (2009). The Theory of Triadic influence. En Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (Second, pp. 451-510). New York: Jossey-Bassspa
dc.relation.referencesGil-Palacio, Z. (2020). Servicios ecosistémicos del control natural en el cultivo del café. En P. Benavides Machado & C. E. Góngora (Eds.), El Control Natural de Insectos en el Ecosistema Cafetero Colombiano (pp. 186-203). Cenicafé. https://doi.org/10.38141/10791/0001_8spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, M., & Serna, A. (2018). Servicios ecosistemicos potenciales en el sector cafetero Colombiano. Revista Cenicafé, 69(2), 12spa
dc.relation.referencesGrosinger, J., Vallet, A., Palomo, I., Buclet, N., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Collective capabilities shape the co-production of nature’s contributions to people in the alpine agricultural system of the Maurienne valley, France. Regional Environmental Change, 21(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01840-9spa
dc.relation.referencesGuarín, C. A., & Pachón, F. A. (2012). Impact of coffee crop renewal program on small producers in department Cundinamarca (Colombia). Agronomía Colombiana, 30(1), 133-140spa
dc.relation.referencesGuzmán Díaz, B. E., Parra Hernández, R., & Tarapuez Chamorro, E. (2019). Identidad y manifestaciones culturales del departamento del Quindío en el contexto del paisaje cultural cafetero de Colombia. Cuadernos de turismo, 44, Article 44spa
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, C. A., Pritts, A. A., Zwetsloot, M. J., Jansen, K., Pulleman, M. M., Armbrecht, I., Avelino, J., Barrera, J. F., Bunn, C., García, J. H., Isaza, C., Munoz-Ucros, J., Pérez-Alemán, C. J., Rahn, E., Robiglio, V., Somarriba, E., & Valencia, V. (2021). Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across Latin America. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(5), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00712-0spa
dc.relation.referencesHeath, L. (2001). Triangulation: Methodology. En N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 15901-15906). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00711-7spa
dc.relation.referencesHegger, D. L. T., Runhaar, H. A. C., Van Laerhoven, F., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2020). Towards explanations for stability and change in modes of environmental governance: A systematic approach with illustrations from the Netherlands. Earth System Governance, 3, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100048spa
dc.relation.referencesHenriksson Malinga, R., Jewitt, G., Lindborg, R., Andersson, E., & Gordon, L. (2018). On the other side of the ditch: Exploring contrasting ecosystem service coproduction between smallholder and commercial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10380-230409spa
dc.relation.referencesHill, R., Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Molnár, Z., & Van Velden, J. (2021). Nature’s contributions to people: Weaving plural perspectives. One Earth, 4(7), 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.009spa
dc.relation.referencesHollaus, A., Schunko, C., Weisshaidinger, R., Bala, P., & Vogl, C. R. (2022). Nature’s contributions to people in the context of a changing traditional rice cultivation landscape in the Upper Baram, Malaysia. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 122(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2022.2162944spa
dc.relation.referencesIntergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [IPBES]. (2017). Update on the Classification of Nature’s Contributions to People by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services | System of Environmental Economic Accounting. 8spa
dc.relation.referencesIsaac, R., Hofmann, J., Koegst, J., Schleyer, C., & Martín-López, B. (2024). Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests: A policy document analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 152, 103657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657spa
dc.relation.referencesIsaac, R., Kachler, J., Winkler, K. J., Albrecht, E., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., & Martín-López, B. (2022). Chapter Ten—Governance to manage the complexity of nature’s contributions to people co-production. En J. M. Holzer, J. Baird, & G. M. Hickey (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 66, pp. 293-321). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250422000095spa
dc.relation.referencesJha, S., Bacon, C., Philpott, S., Méndez, E., Läderach, P., & Rice, R. (2014). Shade Coffee: Update on a Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity. BioScience, 64(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu038spa
dc.relation.referencesJuerges, N., & Hansjürgens, B. (2018). Soil governance in the transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1628-1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143spa
dc.relation.referencesKachler, J., Isaac, R., Martín-López, B., Bonn, A., & Felipe-Lucia, M. R. (2023). Co-production of nature’s contributions to people: What evidence is out there? People and Nature, 5(4), 1119-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10493spa
dc.relation.referencesKooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. En Governing as Governance (pp. 135-152). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://sk.sagepub.com/books/governing-as-governance/n9.xmlspa
dc.relation.referencesKoopmans, M. E., Rogge, E., Mettepenningen, E., Knickel, K., & Šūmane, S. (2018). The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 252-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.012spa
dc.relation.referencesLe, Q. V., Cowal, S., Jovanovic, G., & Le, D.-T. (2021). A Study of Regenerative Farming Practices and Sustainable Coffee of Ethnic Minorities Farmers in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.712733spa
dc.relation.referencesLechthaler, F., & Vinogradova, A. (2017). The climate challenge for agriculture and the value of climate services: Application to coffee-farming in Peru. European Economic Review, 99, 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.006spa
dc.relation.referencesLeibovich, J., Córdoba, C. C., Sánchez, L. M., Marín, Y. A., Méndez, J. D., & Izquierdo, J. M. (2022). Proyección de productores y de la población en hogares cafeteros a 2050. Ensayos de Economía Cafetera, 1(35), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.38141/10788/035-1-1spa
dc.relation.referencesLemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621spa
dc.relation.referencesLescourret, F., Magda, D., Richard, G., Adam-Blondon, A.-F., Bardy, M., Baudry, J., Doussan, I., Dumont, B., Lefèvre, F., Litrico, I., Martin-Clouaire, R., Montuelle, B., Pellerin, S., Plantegenest, M., Tancoigne, E., Thomas, A., Guyomard, H., & Soussana, J.-F. (2015). A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001spa
dc.relation.referencesLevin, S., Xepapadeas, T., Crépin, A.-S., Norberg, J., Zeeuw, A., Folke, C., Hughes, T., Arrow, K., Barrett, S., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Kautsky, N., Mäler, K.-G., Polasky, S., Troell, M., Vincent, J., & Walker, B. (2013). Social-Ecological Systems as Complex Adaptive Systems: Modeling and Policy Implications. Environment and Development Economics, 18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000460spa
dc.relation.referencesLoft, L., Mann, C., & Hansjürgens, B. (2015). Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities. Ecosystem Services, 16, 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez, A., & Espinosa, R. (2018). Biodiversidad en los paisajes cafeteros. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. http://reporte.humboldt.org.co/biodiversidad/2018/cap4/408/spa
dc.relation.referencesLugo-Pérez, J., Hajian-Forooshani, Z., Perfecto, I., & Vandermeer, J. (2023). The importance of shade trees in promoting carbon storage in the coffee agroforest systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 355, 108594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108594spa
dc.relation.referencesMayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solutionspa
dc.relation.referencesMcElwee, P. (2021). The role of soils in learning and inspiration, physical and psychological experiences, and in supporting identities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1834). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0184spa
dc.relation.referencesMcEvoy, S., van de Ven, F. H. M., Blind, M. W., & Slinger, J. H. (2018). Planning support tools and their effects in participatory urban adaptation workshops. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.041spa
dc.relation.referencesMelchior, I. C., & Newig, J. (2021). Governing transitions towards sustainable agriculture—Taking stock of an emerging field of research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1-27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020528spa
dc.relation.referencesMéndez-Rojas, D. M., Cultid-Medina, C. A., López-Barrera, F., & Escobar, F. (2022). How diverse are sun-grown coffee plantations? Local and landscape heterogeneity drives Andean rove beetle diversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 339, 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108122spa
dc.relation.referencesMetzger, J. P., Fidelman, P., Sattler, C., Schröter, B., Maron, M., Eigenbrod, F., Fortin, M.-J., Hohlenwerger, C., & Rhodes, J. R. (2021). Connecting governance interventions to ecosystem services provision: A social-ecological network approach. People and Nature, 3(2), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10172spa
dc.relation.referencesMilligan, M. C., Johnson, M. D., Garfinkel, M., Smith, C. J., & Njoroge, P. (2016). Quantifying pest control services by birds and ants in Kenyan coffee farms. Biological Conservation, 194, 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.028spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Cultura. (2012). Paisaje cultural cafetero: Un paisaje cultural productivo en permanente desarrollo. Ministerio de Cultura de Colombia. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/283spa
dc.relation.referencesMirschel, W., Berg-Mohnicke, M., Wieland, R., Wenkel, K.-O., Terleev, V. V., Topaj, A., & Mueller, L. (2020). Modelling and Simulation of Agricultural Landscapes. En W. Mirschel, V. V. Terleev, & K.-O. Wenkel (Eds.), Landscape Modelling and Decision Support (pp. 3-21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37421-1_1spa
dc.relation.referencesMueller, L., Eulenstein, F., Dronin, N. M., Mirschel, W., McKenzie, B. M., Antrop, M., Jones, M., Dannowski, R., Schindler, U., Behrendt, A., Rukhovich, O. V., Sychev, V. G., Sheudzhen, A. K., Romanenkov, V. A., Trofimov, I., Robinson, G. M., Schreg, R., Blum, W. E. H., Salnjikov, E., … Poulton, P. (2021). Agricultural Landscapes: History, Status and Challenges. En L. Mueller, V. G. Sychev, N. M. Dronin, & F. Eulenstein (Eds.), Exploring and Optimizing Agricultural Landscapes (pp. 3-54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67448-9_1spa
dc.relation.referencesMurillo-López, B. E., Castro, A. J., & Feijoo-Martínez, A. (2022). Nature’s Contributions to People Shape Sense of Place in the Coffee Cultural Landscape of Colombia. Agriculture, 12(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040457spa
dc.relation.referencesNasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8spa
dc.relation.referencesNguyen, N., & Drakou, E. G. (2021). Farmers intention to adopt sustainable agriculture hinges on climate awareness: The case of Vietnamese coffee. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 126828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126828spa
dc.relation.referencesNiguse, G., Iticha, B., Kebede, G., & Chimdi, A. (2022). Contribution of coffee plants to carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems of Southwestern Ethiopia. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 160(6), 440-447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859622000624spa
dc.relation.referencesNorth, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Internacional del Trabajo [ILO]. (2022, junio 3). ¿Cómo cosechar trabajo decente en el sector cafetero colombiano? [Noticia]. http://www.ilo.org/lima/sala-de-prensa/WCMS_847365/lang--es/index.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesOstrom, E. (2009). El gobierno de los bienes comunes: La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. Fondo de Cultura Económicaspa
dc.relation.referencesPahl-Wostl, C., & Patterson, J. (2021). Transformative change in governance systems. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102405spa
dc.relation.referencesPalomo, I., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Bennett, E. M., Martín-López, B., & Pascual, U. (2016). Chapter Six—Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production. En G. Woodward & D. A. Bohan (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 54, pp. 245-283). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250415000276spa
dc.relation.referencesPascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., … Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006spa
dc.relation.referencesPemán, I., & Jiménez, G. (2013). La gobernanza multinivel como alternativa a la gestión del desarrollo del medio rural. http://www.dpz.es/areas/area-de-asistencia-y-modernizacion-local/desarrollo-rural-y-lucha-contra-la-despoblacion/documentacion/premios-de-investigacion/ano-2013/la-gobernanza-multinivel-como-alternativa-a-la-gestion-del-desarrollo-del-medio-rural/viewspa
dc.relation.referencesPerfecto, I., Jiménez-Soto, M. E., & Vandermeer, J. (2019). Coffee Landscapes Shaping the Anthropocene: Forced Simplification on a Complex Agroecological Landscape. Current Anthropology, 60(S20), S236-S250. https://doi.org/10.1086/703413spa
dc.relation.referencesPeriódico regional El Suroeste. (2020, junio 4). Balance del sector cafetero. Periódico regional El Suroeste- identidad y cultura. https://periodicoelsuroeste.com/balance-sector-cafetero/spa
dc.relation.referencesPham, Y., Reardon-Smith, K., Mushtaq, S., & Cockfield, G. (2019). The impact of climate change and variability on coffee production: A systematic review. Climatic Change, 156(4), 609-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02538-yspa
dc.relation.referencesPower, A. G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2959-2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143spa
dc.relation.referencesPrimmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D. N., Bugter, R., & Potschin, M. (2015). Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 16, 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesPrimmer, E., Varumo, L., Krause, T., Orsi, F., Geneletti, D., Brogaard, S., Aukes, E., Ciolli, M., Grossmann, C., Hernández-Morcillo, M., Kister, J., Kluvánková, T., Loft, L., Maier, C., Meyer, C., Schleyer, C., Spacek, M., & Mann, C. (2021). Mapping Europe’s institutional landscape for forest ecosystem service provision, innovations and governance. Ecosystem Services, 47, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101225spa
dc.relation.referencesProantioquia. (2021). Ruta Cartama Sostenible. https://www.proantioquia.org.co/ruta-cartama-sosteniblespa
dc.relation.referencesRiascos, M. A. J., Jurado, H. R. O., & Burbano, T. C. L. (2020). Evaluación de la captura de carbono en sistemas productivos de café (Coffea arabica L.), Consacá, Nariño, Colombia. Revista Luna Azul, 51, 166-181spa
dc.relation.referencesRich, K. M., PG, C., Muniyappa, A., Yadava, C., Manjyapura, G. S., Pradeepa Babu, B., Shubha, Y., & Rich, M. (2018). Coffee certification in India: Awareness, practices, and sustainability perception of growers. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42(4), 448-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1361497spa
dc.relation.referencesRisse, T. (2012). Governance Configurations in Areas of Limited Statehood. Actors, Modes, Institutions, and Resources. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, 32spa
dc.relation.referencesRizzo, G., Migliore, G., Schifani, G., & Vecchio, R. (2023). Key factors influencing farmers’ adoption of sustainable innovations: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Organic Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7spa
dc.relation.referencesRoldán, V., Villasante, S., & Outeiro, L. (2015). Linking marine and terrestrial ecosystem services through governance social networks analysis in Central Patagonia (Argentina). Ecosystem Services, 16, 390-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.010spa
dc.relation.referencesSabatier, P. A. (2010). Teorías Del Proceso de Las Políticas Públicas. Proyecto de Modernización del Estado, Jefatura de Gabinete de Ministros, Presidencia de la Naciónspa
dc.relation.referencesSaito, O., Subramanian, S. M., Hashimoto, S., & Takeuchi, K. (2020). Introduction: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes. En O. Saito, S. M. Subramanian, S. Hashimoto, & K. Takeuchi (Eds.), Managing Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes for Sustainable Communities in Asia: Mapping and Navigating Stakeholders, Policy and Action (pp. 1-10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1133-2_1spa
dc.relation.referencesSamoggia, A., & Fantini, A. (2023). Revealing the Governance Dynamics of the Coffee Chain in Colombia: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sustainability, 15(18), 13646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813646spa
dc.relation.referencesSankey, K. (2022). From survival to self-governance: A comparison of two peasant autonomy struggles in Colombia’s coffee and frontier regions. Journal of Agrarian Change, 22(3), 506-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12465spa
dc.relation.referencesSarkki, S. (2017). Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 27, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.003spa
dc.relation.referencesSarkki, S., Jokinen, M., Heikkinen, H. I., Nijnik, M., Melnykovych, M., & Kluvánková, T. (2022). “Going out to get in”—Roles of forest conflicts in bottom-linked environmental governance progressing toward socio-political innovations. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(6), 478-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2020spa
dc.relation.referencesSattler, C., Barghusen, R., Bredemeier, B., Dutilly, C., & Prager, K. (2023). Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes. Global Environmental Change, 80, 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102668spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, P. G., & Bunn, C. (2021). Coordinated Implementation of Climate-Smart Practices in Coffee Farming Increases Benefits at Farm, Landscape and Global Scale. Frontiers in Climate, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.746139spa
dc.relation.referencesSidibé, A., Totin, E., Thompson- Hall, M., Traoré, O., Traore, P., & Schmitt Olabisi, L. (2017). Multi-scale governance in agriculture systems: Interplay between national and local institutions around the production dimension of food security in Mali. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2017.09.001spa
dc.relation.referencesSiles, P., Cerdán, C. R., & Staver, C. (2022). Smallholder Coffee in the Global Economy—A Framework to Explore Transformation Alternatives of Traditional Agroforestry for Greater Economic, Ecological, and Livelihood Viability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.808207spa
dc.relation.referencesSiles, P., Harmand, J.-M., & Vaast, P. (2010). Effects of Inga densiflora on the microclimate of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) and overall biomass under optimal growing conditions in Costa Rica. Agroforestry Systems, 78(3), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9241-yspa
dc.relation.referencesSomeus, E. (2009). 23 - Recycling and upgrading of bone meal for environmentally friendly crop protection and nutrition: The PROTECTOR project. En K. Waldron (Ed.), Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing (pp. 553-582). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845697051.4.553spa
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquiaspa
dc.relation.referencesSumberg, J., & Giller, K. E. (2022). What is ‘conventional’ agriculture? Global Food Security, 32, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100617spa
dc.relation.referencesTancoigne, E., Barbier, M., Cointet, J.-P., & Richard, G. (2014). The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 10, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004spa
dc.relation.referencesTeixeira, H. M., Schulte, R. P. O., Anten, N. P. R., Bosco, L. C., Baartman, J. E. M., Moinet, G. Y. K., & Reidsma, P. (2022). How to quantify the impacts of diversification on sustainability? A review of indicators in coffee systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00785-5spa
dc.relation.referencesTeixeira, H. M., Vermue, A. J., Cardoso, I. M., Peña Claros, M., & Bianchi, F. J. J. A. (2018). Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management. Ecosystem Services, 33, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006spa
dc.relation.referencesTilden, G. M., Aranka, J. N., & Curry, G. N. (2023). Ecosystem services in coffee agroforestry: Their potential to improve labour efficiency amongst smallholder coffee producers. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00917-0spa
dc.relation.referencesTorres, E., López, M., Torres, J., Sánchez, C., Moncada, J., Valencia, L., Marín, I., Calvopiña, J., & Marín, L. (2021). Boletín Económico Municipal 2021: Betania. Grupo de Investigación de Macroeconomía Aplicada, Universidad de Antioquiaspa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2023). The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/spa
dc.relation.referencesVatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018spa
dc.relation.referencesVergara, C. H., & Badano, E. I. (2009). Pollinator diversity increases fruit production in Mexican coffee plantations: The importance of rustic management systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129(1), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.001spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkler, K. J., Garcia Rodrigues, J., Albrecht, E., & Crockett, E. T. H. (2021). Governance of ecosystem services: A review of empirical literature. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1938235spa
dc.relation.referencesZinngrebe, Y., Borasino, E., Chiputwa, B., Dobie, P., Garcia, E., Gassner, A., Kihumuro, P., Komarudin, H., Liswanti, N., Makui, P., Plieninger, T., Winter, E., & Hauck, J. (2020). Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: Connecting conservation and farming actors. Sustainability Science, 15(5), 1417-1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8spa
dc.relation.referencesZurbriggen, C., Agricultura (IICA), I. I. de C. para la, Uruguay (UDELAR), U. de la R. de, Tecnología (ETIT), E. T. I. y, & Regional (PCIIR), P. de C. I. e I. (2016). Hacia una nueva gobernanza Co-creación de iniciativas innovadoras para un desarrollo agrícola sostenible. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). https://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/2675spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.agrovocGobernanza de la tierra
dc.subject.agrovocPrácticas agrícolas
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción socialspa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::303 - Procesos socialesspa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::306 - Cultura e institucionesspa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::307 - Comunidadesspa
dc.subject.ddc320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estadosspa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::334 - Cooperativasspa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::338 - Producciónspa
dc.subject.ddc630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::633 - Cultivos de campo y de plantaciónspa
dc.subject.lembIndustria del café
dc.subject.lembProducción agropecuaria
dc.subject.lembAgricultura biológica - Investigaciones
dc.subject.lembCafé -- Producción
dc.subject.lembAgroindustria del café -- Investigaciones
dc.subject.lembInteracción social
dc.subject.proposalSistemas socio-ecológicosspa
dc.subject.proposalSostenibilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalGobernanzaspa
dc.subject.proposalContribuciones de la naturaleza a las personasspa
dc.subject.proposalCaféspa
dc.subject.proposalSocial-ecological systemseng
dc.subject.proposalSustainabilityeng
dc.subject.proposalGovernanceeng
dc.subject.proposalNature's contributions to peopleeng
dc.titleGobernanza, prácticas de producción agrícola y las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en sistemas socio-ecológicos cafeterosspa
dc.title.translatedGovernance, agricultural production practices and nature's contributions to people in coffee socio-ecological systemseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentGrupos comunitariosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestrosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticosspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1038803490.2024.pdf
Tamaño:
3.8 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: