Mal estructurando problemas de diseño: oportunidades en las ideas ignoradas

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorAcero Roso, Álvarospa
dc.contributor.authorPinzón Villafrades, Pedro Franciscospa
dc.contributor.researchgroupPedagogía del Diseñospa
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T20:48:23Zspa
dc.date.available2021-02-11T20:48:23Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-11-21spa
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas, fotografíasspa
dc.description.abstractMediante la variación de la estructura de los problemas de diseño es posible impactar en la calidad de la exploración del espacio de la solución del problema de diseño. Este trabajo de investigación propone la mal estructuración de los problemas de diseño como un herramienta para encontrar oportunidades de solución en ideas que pueden descartarse de manera inconsciente. Este trabajo de investigación se adentra en el diseño como una de las industrias creativas y plantea como los diseñadores pueden mejorar su eficiencia en los procesos de diseño, al aumentar el numero de ideas de soluciones que proponen. Para realizar esta investigación se trabaja con una agencia de diseño en la ciudad de Bogotá que cuenta con una población con diferentes niveles de experiencia profesional, edades y capacidades en el procesos de diseño. Para explicar la mal estructuración de los problemas de diseño como herramienta efectiva para la mejora del proceso de diseño, esta investigación ofrece herramientas de caracterización de los procesos de ideación realizados por diseñadores, así como herramientas para impactar en la estructura de los problemas de diseño al variar el nivel de incertidumbre al que se enfrenta un diseñador durante el desarrollo del ejercicio de diseño. Esta investigación a través del diseño da un aporte al aspecto cognitivo del diseño al proponer métodos para trabajar en la fase de ideación del pensamiento de diseño. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractBy changing the structure of design problems, it is possible to impact the quality in the exploration of design solution space. This research proposes ill structuring design problems as a tool to find solution opportunities in ideas that can be discarded unconsciously. This research shows design as a one of the creative industries and raises how designers can improve their efficiency in design processes, by increasing the number of ideas they propose. To carry out this research, we work with a design agency in the city of Bogotá that has a population with different levels of professional experience, ages and abilities in the design process. To explain the ill structuring of design problems as an effective tool for improving the design process, this research offers characterization tools for the ideation processes carried out by designers, as well as tools to impact the structure of design problems by changing the level of uncertainty a designer faces during the development of his design exercise. This research through design contributes to the cognitive aspect of design by proposing methods to work in the ideation phase of design thinking.eng
dc.description.curricularareaDiseñospa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Diseñospa
dc.description.researchareaCognición y pensamiento de diseñospa
dc.format.extent205 páginas + 2 anexosspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79195
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Artesspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Artes - Maestría en Diseñospa
dc.relation.referencesAcero, A. (2016). Aproximaciones críticas (desde la pedagogía) para una enseñanza del diseño. En H. A. Mesa (Ed.), Coloquios del diseño: Disciplina, pedagogía, profesión (pp. 14-29). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAish, R. (2005). From intuition to precision.spa
dc.relation.referencesAltshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon and Breach.spa
dc.relation.referencesBala, S. (2014). Lateral thinking vs vertical thinking. Deliberative Research, 24(1), 25.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeitz, W., Pahl, G., & Grote, K. (1996). Engineering design: a systematic approach. MRS BULLETIN, 71.spa
dc.relation.referencesBenesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y., & Cohen, I. (2009). Pearson correlation coefficient. In Noise reduction in speech processing (pp. 1-4). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997). Contextual design: A customer-centered approach to systems designs.spa
dc.relation.referencesBilalić, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition, 108(3), 652-661.spa
dc.relation.referencesBjörklund, T. A. (2013). Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices. Design Studies, 34(2), 135-160.spa
dc.relation.referencesBratteteig, T., Rolstad, O. K., & Wagner, I. (2016). The life and death of design ideas. In COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23-27 May 2016, Trento, Italy (pp. 259-275). Springer, Cham.spa
dc.relation.referencesBriede-Westermeyer, J. C., & Pérez-Villalobos, C. (2017). Diseño industrial, creatividad e ideación: Estudio sobre el desarrollo de productos en la industria manufacturera del Biobío, Chile. Interciencia, 42(5), 293-300.spa
dc.relation.referencesBriggs, R. O., & Reinig, B. A. (2010). Bounded ideation theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 123-144.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuitrago, F & Duque, I. (2013). La Economía Naranja: una oportunidad infinita. Bogotá: Puntoaparte Bookvertising para el Banco Interamericano del Desarrollo (BID).spa
dc.relation.referencesClaxton, G. (2000). The anatomy of intuition. The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing.spa
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. John Wiley & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design studies, 25(5), 427-441.spa
dc.relation.referencesCross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg.spa
dc.relation.referencesDacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: lexington Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2020, 24 julio). Cuenta Satélite de Cultura y Economía Naranja (CSCEN) 2014-2019pr. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/cuentas-nacionales/cuentas-satelite/cuenta-satelite-de-cultura-en-colombia/cuenta-satelite-de-cultura-y-economia-naranja-cscen-2014-2019prspa
dc.relation.referencesDe Bono, E., & Diéguez, R. D. (1988). Seis sombreros para pensar. Granica.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Kohan, N. C. (2008). Los sesgos cognitivos en la toma de decisiones. International Journal Of Psychological Research, 1(1), 68–73.spa
dc.relation.referencesDesign Council. (2019, 10 septiembre). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council’s evolved Double Diamond. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamondspa
dc.relation.referencesDiethelm, J. (2019). Embodied design thinking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(1), 44-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesDinero. (2018, 9 julio). Así se mueve la publicidad en Colombia. Así se mueve la publicidad en Colombia, por Raúl Ávila. https://www.dinero.com/opinion/columnistas/articulo/asi-se-mueve-la-publicidad-en-colombia-por-raul-avila/259956spa
dc.relation.referencesDix, A., Ormerod, T., Twidale, M., Sas, C., Silva, P. A., & McKnight, L. (2006). Why bad ideas are a good idea.spa
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2003). Exploring the structure of design problems. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm.spa
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2004). On the problem of design problems-problem solving and design expertise. Journal of design research, 4(2), 185-196.spa
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design issues, 22(3), 4-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesDorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design studies, 22(5), 425-437.spa
dc.relation.referencesDurling, D. (1999). Intuition in Design: A perspective on designers' creativity. In Bulletin of 4th Asian Design Conference International Symposium on Design Science.spa
dc.relation.referencesDziobczenski, P. R. N., & Person, O. (2017). Graphic designer wanted: A document analysis of the described skill set of graphic designers in job advertisements from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Design, 11(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesEspinel, M. C., Bruno, A., & Plasencia, I. (2010). La comprensión de gráficas de porcentaje de variación en situaciones cotidianas. Revista Iberoamericana de educación Matemática, 1(24), 83-102.spa
dc.relation.referencesFarrell, R., & Hooker, C. (2013). Design, science and wicked problems. Design studies, 34(6), 681-705.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoster, J., & Corby, L. (2007). How to get ideas. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrog. (2014, 26 junio). Global Design and Innovation Consulting Firm. frog design. https://www.frogdesign.com/spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, F. M. G. (1992). Los mapas conceptuales de JD Novak como instrumentos para la investigación en didáctica de las ciencias experimentales. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 148-158.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilhooly, K. J. (1989). Human and Machine Problem Solving Toward a Comparative Cognitive Science. In Human and machine problem solving (pp. 1-12). Springer, Boston, MA.spa
dc.relation.referencesGirotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management science, 56(4), 591-605.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoel, V. (2014). Creative brains: designing in the real world. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 241.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive science, 16(3), 395-429.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design studies, 35(1), 29-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrammenos, Dimitris, and Margherita Antona. "Future designers: Introducing creativity, design thinking & design to children." International journal of child-computer interaction 16 (2018): 16-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesHead, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601spa
dc.relation.referencesHead, B., & Alford, J. (2008). Wicked problems: Implications for policy and management. In Australian Political Studies Association Conference.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R., & Torres, C. P. M. (2018). Metodología de la investigación (Vol. 4). México^ eD. F DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernandis, B., & Cabello, M. (2006). Creatividad, Innovación y desarrollo de Nuevos Productos.spa
dc.relation.referencesHlavacek, I., Chleboun, J., & Babuska, I. (2004). Uncertain input data problems and the worst scenario method. Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesHofer, E., Kloos, M., Krzykacz-Hausmann, B., Peschke, J., & Woltereck, M. (2002). An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 77(3), 229-238.spa
dc.relation.referencesHofstadter, D. R. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, 499-538.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoppe, R. (2018). Heuristics for practitioners of policy design: Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems. Public policy and administration, 33(4), 384-408.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoward, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design studies, 29(2), 160-180.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuera, V. L. N., Balseca, J. O., & Tigselema, I. L. P. (2016). Diseño gráfico para fortalecer la cultura organizacional. SATHIRI, (11), 86-95.spa
dc.relation.referencesHugentobler, H. K., Jonas, W., & Rahe, D. (2004, November). Designing a methods platform for design and design research. In Futureground, Design Research Society, International Conference, Monash University, Australia.spa
dc.relation.referencesIDEO. (2013). Design Thinking for Educators: Toolkit (2.a ed.). IDEO.spa
dc.relation.referencesJansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design studies, 12(1), 3-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and innovation management, 22(2), 121-146.spa
dc.relation.referencesJuan, B. M. (2018). El director de arte en la configuración de los equipos creativos: proceso creativo y acceso a las agencias de publicidad. grafica, 6(11), 13-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesKale, U., & Akcaoglu, M. (2020). Problem Solving and Teaching How to Solve Problems in Technology-Rich Contexts. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(2), 127-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesKoshik, I. (2003). Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. ARTIFACT-ROUTLEDGE-, 1(11), 51.spa
dc.relation.referencesLawson, B. R. (1979). Cognitive strategies in architectural design. Ergonomics, 22(1), 59-68.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiao, Y., Yang, C., & Li, W. (2015). Extension innovation design of product family based on Kano requirement model. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 268-277.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindberg, T., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2010). Evolving discourses on design thinking: how design cognition inspires meta-disciplinary creative collaboration. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 8(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesLindemann, U. (2009). Methodical development of technical products. Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte. Berlin: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesLuchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological monographs, 54(6), i.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaher, M. L., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. (1996). Formalising design exploration as co-evolution. In Advances in formal design methods for CAD (pp. 3-30). Springer, Boston, MA.spa
dc.relation.referencesMayer, R. E. (1989). Human nonadversary problem solving. In Human and machine problem solving (pp. 39-56). Springer, Boston, MA.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, D. P., Yang, M. C., Hernández, A. A., Linsey, J. S., & Wood, K. L. (2015). A step beyond to overcome design fixation: a design-by-analogy approach. In Design computing and Cognition'14 (pp. 607-624). Springer, Cham.spa
dc.relation.referencesNelson, B. A., Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., & Yen, J. (2009). Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30(6), 737-743.spa
dc.relation.referencesNovak, J. D. (1998). Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahvah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesOzkan, O., & Dogan, F. (2013). Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: Differences between expert and novice designers. Design Studies, 34(2), 161-192.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeeters, J., Verhaegen, P. A., Vandevenne, D., & Duflou, J. R. (2010). Refined metrics for measuring novelty in ideation. IDMME Virtual Concept Research in Interaction Design, Oct, 20-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (1981). La teoría de Piaget. Infancia y aprendizaje, 4(sup2), 13-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesPons, D. (2004). Design for uncertainty. Conference: Design Research Society International Conference, 'Futureground'. Melbourne.spa
dc.relation.referencesRazzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, 82(3), 330-348.spa
dc.relation.referencesReitman, W. R. (1964). Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of ill-defined problems. Human judgments and optimality, 282-315.spa
dc.relation.referencesRíos, A. (2018, 1 junio). Registre su compañía en el Ranking de las 300 empresas de la comunicación. Revista PyM. https://revistapym.com.co/comunicacion/ranking-de-la-comunicacion-publicitariaspa
dc.relation.referencesRittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155-169.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoozenburg, N. F., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: fundamentals and methods.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchön, D.A., & V. DeSanctis. (1986). “The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education29–30. doi: 10.1080/07377366.1986.10401080.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well‐defined and ill‐defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 523-538.spa
dc.relation.referencesShah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design studies, 24(2), 111-134.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial intelligence, 4(3-4), 181-201.spa
dc.relation.referencesSloan, M. C. (2010). Aristotle’s nicomachean ethics as the original locus for the septem circumstantiae. Classical Philology, 105(3), 236-251.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuoheimo, M. (2020). Strategies and Visual Tools to Resolve Wicked Problems - University of Lapland research portal. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 13(2), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v13i02/25-41spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, R. N. (1974). Nature of problem ill‐structuredness: Implications for problem formulation and solution. Decision Sciences, 5(4), 632-643.spa
dc.relation.referencesTepper, S. J. (2002). Creative assets and the changing economy. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 32(2), 159-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesToro, W. O. (2016). Componentes in-textuales del diseño: Naturaleza del diseño vs. naturaleza de la pedagogía del diseño. En H. A. Mesa (Ed.), Coloquios del diseño: Disciplina, pedagogía, profesión (pp. 14-29). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesTorrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking– Norms: Technical Manual Research Edition—Verbal Tests, Forms A and B— Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2017) Industrias creativas | Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. http://www.unesco.org/. Recuperado 5 de agosto de 2020, de http://www.unesco.org/new/es/culture/themes/creativity/creative-industries/spa
dc.relation.referencesVerhaegen, P. A., Vandevenne, D., Peeters, J., & Duflou, J. R. (2013). Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, 34(2), 243-263.spa
dc.relation.referencesVisser, W. (2006). Designing as construction of representations: A dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research. Human–Computer Interaction, 21(1), 103-152.spa
dc.relation.referencesWallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the tripod student perception survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834-1868.spa
dc.relation.referencesWallerstein, I. (1998). Uncertainty and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 320-322.spa
dc.relation.referencesWard, T. B., Patterson, M. J., & Sifonis, C. M. (2004). The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 1-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesWehmeier, S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary: Of Current English. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesYilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2016). Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation. Design Studies, 46, 95-124.spa
dc.relation.referencesYilmaz, S., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Cognitive heuristics in design: Instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM, 24(3), 335.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc700 - Las artes, bellas artes y artes decorativas::701 - Filosofía y teoría de las artes finas y decorativasspa
dc.subject.proposalPensamiento de diseñospa
dc.subject.proposalDesign thinkingeng
dc.subject.proposalProblemas mal estructuradosspa
dc.subject.proposalIll structured problemseng
dc.subject.proposalIdeaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalIdeationeng
dc.subject.proposalCreatividadspa
dc.subject.proposalCreativityeng
dc.subject.proposalProblemas de diseñospa
dc.subject.proposalDesign problemseng
dc.subject.proposalEspacio del problemaspa
dc.subject.proposalProblem spaceeng
dc.subject.proposalEspacio de la soluciónspa
dc.subject.proposalSolution spaceeng
dc.subject.unescoInventivaspa
dc.subject.unescoCreative thinkingeng
dc.subject.wikidatacreatividadspa
dc.subject.wikidatacreativityeng
dc.subject.wikidatadiseñospa
dc.subject.wikidatadesigneng
dc.titleMal estructurando problemas de diseño: oportunidades en las ideas ignoradasspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
1032374954.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
4.59 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Diseño
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
1032374954.2020.Anexo A.pdf
Tamaño:
4.15 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Anexo A
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
1032374954.2020.Anexo B.pdf
Tamaño:
1.34 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Anexo B
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Diseño