Los procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLab

dc.contributor.advisorMartinez Medina, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorSalas Prada, Alejandro
dc.contributor.researchgroupEstudios Sociales de la Ciencia, la Tecnología Y la Medicinaspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T13:37:04Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T13:37:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas, fotografías, gráficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractLos talleres de co-creación se ha difundido en cada vez más diversos espacios: la innovación empresarial, las políticas públicas, la investigación académica. Emergiendo como una manera de pensar los encuentros colaborativos cuidadosamente preparada. Esta es una investigación etnográfica sobre la colaboración, sobre las prácticas de co-creación en proyectos de innovación y diseño. Llevé a cabo trabajo de campo en la serie de sesiones de trabajo en las que la universidad A en Pereira, Colombia desarrollo las actividades propuestas por la universidad B en Nancy, Francia destinadas a hacer un laboratorio de innovación social enfocado en cambio climático en la universidad latinoamericana. En esta investigación exploro las agencias múltiples que hacen el encuentro, en las sesiones, además de personas, las actividades y cosas como los tableros, las notas adhesivas y el software hacen parte la práctica colaborativa. Los procedimientos de co-creación configuran las relaciones de poder, la práctica de la escucha y la realización de los acuerdos. También argumento que el poder y la escucha no son excluyentes en un ejercicio de participación, los procedimientos de co-creación organizan los tiempos de la palabra, los turnos, las interrupciones, las preguntas y los procedimientos con los que se decide. Así mismo, muestro cómo la práctica genera acuerdos y desacuerdos en esta toma de decisiones; reconociendo la parcialidad como una condición de los acuerdos en el ejercicio de la colaboración. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThe co-creation workshops have widespread across every time more diverse spaces: business innovation, public policy, academic research. Emerging as a way to think collaborative encounters carefully prepared. This is ethnographic research about collaboration, about practices of co-creation in innovation and design practices. I conducted field work in the series of working sessions in which university A in Pereira, Colombia developed the activities proposed by university B in Nancy, France aimed at making a social innovation laboratory focused on climate change in the Latin American university. In this research I explore the multiple agencies that make the encounter, in the sessions, in addition to people, activities and things such as boards, sticky notes and software are part of the collaborative practice. Co-creation procedures shape power relations, the practice of listening, and the making of agreements. I also argue that power and listening are not mutually exclusive in a participatory exercise; co-creation procedures organize speaking times, turns, interruptions, questions and decision-making procedures. Likewise, I show how the practice generates agreements and disagreements in this decision making; recognizing partiality as a condition of agreements in the exercise of collaboration.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Estudios Sociales de La Cienciaspa
dc.description.methodsEsta es una investigación etnográfica sobre la colaboración, sobre las prácticas de co-creación en proyectos de innovación y diseño.spa
dc.format.extent146 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85448
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAngerer, M.-L. (2015). Desire After Affect. Rowman & Littlefield International.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaird, D. (2004). Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. University of California Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics And the Entanglement of Matter And Meaning. Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaudry, J., Tancoigne, É., & Strasser, B. J. (2022). Turning crowds into communities: The collectives of online citizen science. Social Studies of Science, 52(3), 399-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211058791spa
dc.relation.referencesBennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623spa
dc.relation.referencesBlacker, S., Kimura, A. H., & Kinchy, A. (2021). When citizen science is public relations. Social Studies of Science, 51(5), 780-796. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211027662spa
dc.relation.referencesBloor, D. (1998). Conocimiento e imaginario social. Gedisa.spa
dc.relation.referencesBotero, A. (2013). Expanding design space(s): design in communal endeavours. Aalto University.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperBusiness.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637spa
dc.relation.referencesBychkova, O. (2016). Innovation by coercion: Emerging institutionalization of university-industry collaborations in Russia. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716654768spa
dc.relation.referencesCaccamo, M. (2020). Leveraging innovation spaces to foster collaborative innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(1), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12357spa
dc.relation.referencesChilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(3), 347-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885spa
dc.relation.referencesCitton, Y. (2017). The Ecology of Attention. Polity Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, H. (1997). Un Programa Empírico del Relativismo en Sociología del Conocimiento Científico. In M. Gonzáles García, J. López Cerezo, & J. Luis Luján (Eds.), Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad: Lecturas Seleccionadas. Editorial Ariel S.A.spa
dc.relation.referencesCozza, M., Cusinato, A., & Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2020). Atmosphere in Participatory Design. Science as Culture, 29(2), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1681952spa
dc.relation.referencesDantec, C. A. Le, & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581spa
dc.relation.referencesde la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2002). Mil Mesetas: Capitalismo y Esquizofrenia (5th ed.). Pre-textos.spa
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, A., & Callén, B. (2017). Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science, 26(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516647348spa
dc.relation.referencesDelvenne, P., & Macq, H. (2020). Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments. Science as Culture, 29(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1668369spa
dc.relation.referencesDespret, V. (2008). El cuerpo de nuestros desvelos: figuras de la antropo-zoo-génesis. In Tecnogenesis, La construccion tecnica de las ecologias humanas (pp. 229-260). AIBR (Antropologos Iberoamericanos en Red),.spa
dc.relation.referencesDespret, V. (2022). A la salud de los muertos: relatos de quienes quedan. La Oveja Roja.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz Valderrama, M. O. (2021). Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, A. (2016). Cosmo/visiones del Pacífico y sus implicaciones socioambientales: Elementos para un diálogo de visiones. Foros Semana, 1-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Network of Living Labs. (n.d.). Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://enoll.org/network/living-labs/spa
dc.relation.referencesFelt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., & Völker, T. (2016). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 732-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989spa
dc.relation.referencesFerreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761spa
dc.relation.referencesFish, A. (2021). Crash Theory: Entrapments of Conservation Drones and Endangered Megafauna. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(2), 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920920356spa
dc.relation.referencesGibbons, S. (2016, July 31). Design Thinking 101. Nielsen Norman Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesGovella, A. (2019). Collaborative product design. O'Reilly Media, Inc,.spa
dc.relation.referencesGramaglia, C., & Mélard, F. (2019). Looking for the Cosmopolitical Fish: Monitoring Marine Pollution with Anglers and Congers in the Gulf of Fos, Southern France. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 814-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919860197spa
dc.relation.referencesGross, M., & Schulte-Römer, N. (2019). Remaking Participatory Democracy through Experimental Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(4), 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918799172spa
dc.relation.referencesGuber, R. (2001). La etnografía, método, campo y reflexividad. Editorial Norma.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. (1984). Manifiesto Ciborg: El sueño irónico de un lenguaje común para las mujeres en el circuito integrado. Universidad de Vigo.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. (1991). Conocimientos situados: la cuestión científica en el feminismo y el privilegio de la perspectiva parcial. In Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza. Titivillus.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaraway, D. (2018). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse Feminism and Technoscience (2nd ed.). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesHayles, K. (2010). Cybernetics. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2007). Thinking Through Things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically (A. Henare, M. Holbraad, & S. Wastell, Eds.). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesHyysalo, S., & Johnson, M. (2016). User Representation: A Journey Towards Conceptual Maturation. In S. Hyysalo, T.-E. Jensen, & N. Oudshoorn (Eds.), The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies (Routledge, Vol. 1, pp. 75-100). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesIngold, T. (2008). Tres en uno: Cómo disolver las distinciones entre cuerpo, mente y cultura. In T. Sánchez (Ed.), Tecnogénesis: La construcción técnica de las ecologías humanas (p. 33).spa
dc.relation.referencesInnovation and applied research for mitigation and adaptation Climate change. (n.d.). Retrieved July 22, 2023, from https://climate-labs.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesIrani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 799-824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915578486spa
dc.relation.referencesJasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesKleinman, D. L., & Suryanarayanan, S. (2020). Pollinating Collaboration: Diverse Stakeholders' Efforts to Build Experiments in the Wake of the Honey Bee Crisis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(4), 686-711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919865962spa
dc.relation.referencesKohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press, Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesKohtala, C. (2017). Making "Making" Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology. The Design Journal, 20(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1261504spa
dc.relation.referencesKrzywoszynska, A., Matt, W., Buckley, A., Chiles, P., Gregson, N., Holmes, H., & Mawyin, J. (2018). Opening Up the Participation Laboratory. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 785-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917752865spa
dc.relation.referencesLahsen, M. (2016). Toward a Sustainable Future Earth. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(5), 876-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916639728spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1990). Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together. In S. Lynch, Michael; Woolgar (Ed.), Representation in scientific practice (MIT Press, pp. 16-68).spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1992). Ciencia en acción: Cómo seguir a los científicos e ingenieros a través de la sociedad. Open University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2004a). How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2-3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2004b). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/421123spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2005a). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2005b). 'Thou Shall Not Freeze-Frame,'or, How Not to Misunderstand the Science and Religion Debate. In J. D. Proctor (Ed.), Science, Religion, and the Human Experience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195175328.001.0001spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2016). Del Realpolitik al Dingpolitik: o de cómo hacer las cosas públicas. Acta Sociológica, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acso.2017.06.005spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. New Jersey.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on Materiality and Sociality. The Sociological Review, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00604.xspa
dc.relation.referencesMadeleine, A. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez Medina, S., & Hernández-Manrique, O. L. (2020). Colecta como captura recíproca múltiple: etnógrafos, científicos y especímenes en clave cosmopolítica. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.640spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Medina, S. (2022). Knowledge Practices. In The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2516spa
dc.relation.referencesMatias, N. (2011). Co-design in a historical context. MIT Civic Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesMedinilla, Á. (2012). Agile Management: Leadership in an Agile Environment. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeehan, K., Klenk, N. L., & Mendez, F. (2018). The Geopolitics of Climate Knowledge Mobilization. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 759-784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917745601spa
dc.relation.referencesMillner, N. (2020). As the drone flies: Configuring a vertical politics of contestation within forest conservation. Political Geography, 80, 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102163spa
dc.relation.referencesMol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMol, A., & Law, J. (2017). Embodied action, enacted bodies. the example of hypoglycaemia. In Logos (Russian Federation) (Vol. 27, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-233-259spa
dc.relation.referencesMontes Cruz, J. J. (2020). Traducir lo material?: el codiseño entre diseñadores industriales y tejedoras-diseñadoras wayúu. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesMontes, J. J. (2022). Pensando con otros: las figuraciones como herramientas para describir la multiplicidad. Maguaré, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.15446/mag.v36n1.100873spa
dc.relation.referencesMúnera, L. (2005). Poder: trayectorias teóricas de un concepto. Colombia Internacional, 62(Jul-Dic 2005), 32-49.spa
dc.relation.referencesNascimento, S., Pólvora, A., Paio, A., Oliveira, S., Rato, V., Oliveira, M. J., Varela, B., & Sousa, J. P. (2016). Sustainable Technologies and Transdisciplinary Futures: From Collaborative Design to Digital Fabrication. Science as Culture, 25(4), 520-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1193131spa
dc.relation.referencesNayak, P. R., & Ketteringham, J. (2003). 3M's Post-it Notes: A Managed or Accidental Innovation? . In R. Katz (Ed.), The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation: A Collection of Readings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. A. (1994). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesOsorio, F. (2021). Management of innovation labs: an enabling methodological approach for strategic intent design. Université de Lorraine; Universidad nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesOsorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12301spa
dc.relation.referencesOudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Bustos, T. (2021). Gestos textiles: Un Acercamiento Material a las Etnografías, los Cuerpos y los Tiempos. Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Bustos, T., Martinez Medina, S., & Mora-Gámez, F. (2018). What is "(un)making" STS ethnographies? Reflections (not exclusively) from Latin America. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2018.1551825spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Bustos, Tania; Márquez, S. D. (2016). Destejiendo puntos de vista feministas: reflexiones metodológicas desde la etnografía del diseño de una tecnología. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 11(31). http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-00132016000100008&lang=esspa
dc.relation.referencesPfotenhauer, S., & Jasanoff, S. (2017). Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the 'MIT model' in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 783-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706110spa
dc.relation.referencesPuig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoss, P. (2011). Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science, 41(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710385851spa
dc.relation.referencesSavolainen, K., & Hyysalo, S. (2021). User Representations as a Design Resource. Science & Technology Studies, 34(2), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.84598spa
dc.relation.referencesSchick, L., & Winthereik, B. R. (2016). Making Energy Infrastructure: Tactical Oscillations and Cosmopolitics. Science as Culture, 25(1), 44-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1093731spa
dc.relation.referencesSchrevel, S., Slager, M., & de Vlugt, E. (2020). "I Stood By and Watched": An Autoethnography of Stakeholder Participation in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(11), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1400spa
dc.relation.referencesSeitz, T. (2020). Design Thinking and the New Spirit of Capitalism. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31715-7spa
dc.relation.referencesShapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpencer, M., Dányi, E., & Hayashi, Y. (2019). Asymmetries and Climate Futures: Working with Waters in an Indigenous Australian Settlement. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), 786-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919852667spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (1993). Cooperation Without Consensus in Scientific Problem Solving: Dynamics of Oosure in Open Systems. In CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict? (pp. 93-106). Springer-Verlag.spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377-391.spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3).spa
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (1997). La guerre des sciences: Cosmopolitiques 1 (Vol. 1). La Découverte.spa
dc.relation.referencesStiegler, B. (2010). Memory. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical terms for media studies (p. 353). Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStrathern, M. (1999). Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. The Athlone Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2005). Affiliative Objects. Organization, 12(3), 379-399.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2011). Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640spa
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2012). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesThacker, E. (2010). Biomedia. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTsing, A. L. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruin. Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Oost, E. (2003). Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure the Users' Femininity and Masculinity. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies (The MIT Press, pp. 193-209). The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesVoß, J.-P., & Amelung, N. (2016). Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science, 46(5), 749-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716641350spa
dc.relation.referencesWatzl, S. (2017). Structuring Mind: The Nature of Attention and How it Shapes Consciousness. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilf, E. (2016). The Post-it Note Economy: Understanding Post-Fordist Business Innovation through One of Its Key Semiotic Technologies. Current Anthropology, 57(6), 732-760. https://doi.org/10.1086/688952spa
dc.relation.referencesWilkie, A. (2011). Régimenes de diseño, lógicas de usuarios. Athenea Digital, 11(1), 317-334.spa
dc.relation.referencesWinner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesWinthrop-Young, G. (2010). Hardware / Software / Wetware. In W. J. T. Mitchell & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Critical Terms for Media Studies. The University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWoolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 58-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.xspa
dc.relation.referencesZenk, L., Hynek, N., Krawinkler, S. A., Peschl, M. F., & Schreder, G. (2021). Supporting innovation processes using material artefacts: Comparing the use of LEGO bricks and moderation cards as boundary objects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 845-859. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12459spa
dc.relation.referencesZilliox, S., & Smith, J. M. (2018). Colorado's Fracking Debates: Citizen Science, Conflict and Collaboration. Science as Culture, 27(2), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1425384spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados al autor, 2023spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::302 - Interacción socialspa
dc.subject.lembTrabajo en equipospa
dc.subject.lembCultura científicaspa
dc.subject.lembScientific cultureeng
dc.subject.proposalColaboraciónspa
dc.subject.proposalPrácticasspa
dc.subject.proposalCo-creaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalDiseñospa
dc.subject.proposalInnovaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalEtnografíaspa
dc.subject.proposalAgenciaspa
dc.subject.proposalCollaborationeng
dc.subject.proposalPracticeseng
dc.subject.proposalCo-creationeng
dc.subject.proposalDesigneng
dc.subject.proposalInnovationeng
dc.subject.proposalEthnographyeng
dc.subject.proposalAgencyeng
dc.subject.unescoInnovación científicaspa
dc.subject.unescoScientific innovationseng
dc.titleLos procedimientos de la colaboración : Una etnografía sobre los talleres de co-creación para la realización de un ClimateLabspa
dc.title.translatedThe procedures of collaboration : An ethnography on the co-creation workshops for the making of a ClimateLabeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentGrupos comunitariosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestrosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticosspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1018481330.2024.pdf
Tamaño:
1.85 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: