Construcción y validación de un instrumento de medición de toxicidad financiera (TF) en pacientes con cáncer en Colombia

dc.contributor.advisorSanchez Pedraza, Ricardo
dc.contributor.advisorSierra Matamoros, Fabio Alexander
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Arevalo, Julio Cesar
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.coverage.tgnhttp://vocab.getty.edu/page/tgn/1000050
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-11T21:48:45Z
dc.date.available2026-02-11T21:48:45Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-30
dc.descriptionilustraciones a color, diagramas, fotografías, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractAnte los altos costos del tratamiento y la imposibilidad de pago de algunos pacientes, en la literatura se ha descrito la toxicidad financiera como el conjunto de dificultades financieras y malestar psicosocial derivados de la atención oncológica. En Colombia no se identificaron instrumentos con evidencias suficientes de validez y confiabilidad para medir este constructo. Este estudio conceptualizó teórica y operativamente la toxicidad financiera en el contexto nacional y construyó y validó un instrumento para su medición. El desarrollo siguió un modelo de diseño basado en evidencia, adaptado de Zieky, para alinear el marco teórico, los dominios y los ítems, e incorporó los lineamientos del marco COSMIN para la evaluación de medidas en salud. Metodológicamente, el estudio se desarrolló en cuatro fases que incluyeron la delimitación teórica del constructo, la formulación de ítems, el pilotaje con ajustes y la validación psicométrica mediante teoría clásica de los tests y teoría de respuesta al ítem. El instrumento resultante mostró una estructura bidimensional asociada al impacto financiero y al impacto psicosocial, con alta consistencia interna y adecuado ajuste del modelo. La estabilidad de la estructura se corroboró mediante validación cruzada con submuestras independientes. Desde el enfoque de teoría de respuesta al ítem se estimaron parámetros de los ítems, observándose adecuada discriminación en la mayoría de ellos y oportunidades de mejora en categorías específicas. Se evidenció validez convergente negativa con instrumentos relacionados y validez de constructo mediante correlaciones con medidas de calidad de vida. El estudio cumplió los requisitos éticos, incluyendo consentimiento informado y aprobación por comités de ética institucionales. En conclusión, el instrumento desarrollado constituye el primer prom para la medición de toxicidad financiera en pacientes oncológicos en Colombia y aporta evidencias sólidas de validez y confiabilidad para su uso en investigación clínica, toma de decisiones y formulación de políticas orientadas a la protección financiera en salud. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractHigh treatment costs and patients’ inability to afford care have led to the description of financial toxicity as a set of financial difficulties and psychosocial distress derived from oncology care. In Colombia, no instruments with sufficient evidence of validity and reliability were identified to measure this construct. This study theoretically and operationally conceptualized financial toxicity in the national context and developed and validated an instrument for its measurement. The development followed an evidence-based design model adapted from Zieky to align the theoretical framework, domains, and items, and incorporated the COSMIN framework guidelines for the evaluation of health measurement instruments. Methodologically, the study was conducted in four phases, including theoretical delineation of the construct, item formulation, pilot testing with adjustments, and psychometric validation using classical test theory and item response theory. The resulting instrument showed a bidimensional structure associated with financial impact and psychosocial impact, with high internal consistency and adequate model fit. Structural stability was confirmed through cross-validation with independent subsamples. From the item response theory approach, item parameters were estimated, showing adequate discrimination for most items and opportunities for improvement in specific categories. Evidence of negative convergent validity with related instruments and construct validity through correlations with quality-of-life measures was observed. Ethical requirements were met, including informed consent and approval by institutional ethics committees. In conclusion, the developed instrument constitutes the first prom for the measurement of financial toxicity in oncology patients in Colombia and provides solid evidence of validity and reliability for use in clinical research, decision-making, and the design of policies aimed at financial protection in health.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Epidemiología Clinica
dc.description.methodsEstudio metodológico de diseño y validación de escalas. La construcción del instrumento se desarrolló siguiendo un enfoque de diseño basado en evidencias, adaptado del modelo propuesto por Zieky, orientado a la definición teórica y operativa del constructo, el diseño sistemático de los ítems y la coherencia entre el propósito de medición y la interpretación de los puntajes. El proceso de validación se llevó a cabo de acuerdo con las directrices del marco COSMIN para instrumentos de medición en salud, e incluyó la evaluación de la validez de contenido, la estructura interna, la consistencia interna y el comportamiento psicométrico de los ítems. La validación psicométrica se realizó mediante enfoques de teoría clásica de los tests y teoría de respuesta al ítem, lo que permitió evaluar tanto las propiedades globales del instrumento como el desempeño individual de los ítems.
dc.description.researchareaEpidemiología clínica
dc.description.technicalinfoEl estudio incluyó análisis psicométricos y estadísticos avanzados para la construcción y validación del instrumento de medición de toxicidad financiera. El procesamiento y análisis de los datos se realizaron mediante el software estadístico R, empleando herramientas computacionales para análisis descriptivos, análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio, estimación de consistencia interna y evaluación de la estructura interna del instrumento. Desde el enfoque de teoría clásica de los tests se estimaron índices de confiabilidad y ajuste del modelo, mientras que desde la teoría de respuesta al ítem se aplicaron modelos politómicos (modelo de respuesta graduada) para la estimación de parámetros de discriminación y umbrales de los ítems. Los análisis se desarrollaron siguiendo estándares internacionales para la validación de instrumentos de medición en salud.spa
dc.description.technicalinfoThe study included advanced psychometric and statistical analyses for the construction and validation of the financial toxicity measurement instrument. Data processing and analysis were conducted using the statistical software R, employing computational tools for descriptive analyses, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, estimation of internal consistency, and evaluation of the internal structure of the instrument. From the perspective of classical test theory, reliability indices and model fit were estimated, while item response theory approaches applied polytomous models (graded response model) to estimate item discrimination parameters and threshold values. All analyses were conducted in accordance with international standards for the validation of health measurement instruments.eng
dc.format.extentxix, 261 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89511
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Investigaciones Clínicasspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicina
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Maestría en Epidemiología Clínica
dc.relation.indexedBireme
dc.relation.referencesYousuf Zafar S, Abernethy AP. Financial Toxicity, Part I: A New Name for a Growing Problem.
dc.relation.referencesHoward DH, Molinari NA, Thorpe KE. National estimates of medical costs incurred by nonelderly cancer patients. Cancer [Internet]. 2004 Mar 1;100(5):883–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20063
dc.relation.referencesZafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, et al. The Financial Toxicity of Cancer Treatment: A Pilot Study Assessing Out-of-Pocket Expenses and the Insured Cancer Patient’s Experience. Oncologist. 2013 Apr 1;18(4):381–90.
dc.relation.referencesMeisenberg BR, Varner A, Ellis E, Ebner S, Moxley J, Siegrist E, et al. Patient Attitudes Regarding the Cost of Illness in Cancer Care. Oncologist. 2015 Oct 1;20(10):1199–204.
dc.relation.referencesCentro de estudios económicos ANIF. Gasto de bolsillo en salud_ otra cara de la crisis que atraviesa el sistema - ANIF. 2025 Aug [cited 2025 Oct 11]; Available from: https://www.anif.com.co/informe-semanal/gasto-de-bolsillo-en-salud-otra-cara-de-la-crisis-que-atraviesa-el-sistema/
dc.relation.referencesCastaño López LD, Montoya Agudelo MA, Montoya Bolívar N. Gasto de bolsillo de las familias y pacientes con cáncer, afiliados al régimen subsidiado y atendidos en el hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe durante el año 2020. [Medellin]: Universidad de Antioquia; 2021.
dc.relation.referencesCarrera PM, Kantarjian HM, Blinder VS. The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: Understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2018 Mar [cited 2021 Feb 8];68(2):153–65. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.3322/caac.21443
dc.relation.referencesZafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, et al. The Financial Toxicity of Cancer Treatment: A Pilot Study Assessing Out-of-Pocket Expenses and the Insured Cancer Patient’s Experience. Oncologist. 2013 Apr 1;18(4):381–90.
dc.relation.referencesThe Global Cancer Observatory. GLOBOCAN 2020. International Agency Research on Cancer. 2020.
dc.relation.referencesSharp L, Carsin AE, Timmons A. Associations between cancer-related financial stress and strain and psychological well-being among individuals living with cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(4):745–55.
dc.relation.referencesZafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, et al. The Financial Toxicity of Cancer Treatment: A Pilot Study Assessing Out‐of‐Pocket Expenses and the Insured Cancer Patient’s Experience. Oncologist. 2013;18(4):381–90.
dc.relation.referencesSharp L, Carsin AE, Timmons A. Associations between cancer-related financial stress and strain and psychological well-being among individuals living with cancer. Psychooncology [Internet]. 2013 Apr 1;22(4):745–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3055
dc.relation.referencesCovinsky KE, Goldman L, Cook EF, Oye R, Desbiens N, Reding D, et al. The Impact of Serious Illness on Patients’ Families. JAMA [Internet]. 1994 Dec 21;272(23):1839–44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520230049037
dc.relation.referencesBarbaret C, Brosse C, Rhondali W, Ruer M, Monsarrat L, Michaud P, et al. Financial distress in patients with advanced cancer. PLoS One. 2017 May 1;12(5).
dc.relation.referencesWitte J, Mehlis K, Surmann B, Lingnau R, Damm O, Greiner W, et al. Methods for measuring financial toxicity after cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review and its implications. Vol. 30, Annals of Oncology. Oxford University Press; 2019. p. 1061–70.
dc.relation.referencesDe Souza JA, Yap BJ, Hlubocky FJ, Wroblewski K, Ratain MJ, Cella D, et al. The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: The COST measure. Cancer. 2014 Oct 15;120(20):3245–53.
dc.relation.referencesKhera N, Chang Y hui, Hashmi S, Slack J, Beebe T, Roy V, et al. Financial burden in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2014;20(9):1375–81.
dc.relation.referencesPrawitz A, Garman E, Benoit S, Barbara O, Kim J, Drentea P. InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale: Development, Administration, and Score Interpretation. Financial Counseling and Planning. 2006 Jan 1;17.
dc.relation.referencesSánchez R, Ballesteros M, Ortiz N. Análisis de la validez de contenido de la escala FACT-G mediante técnicas de escalamiento multidimensional Evaluation of content validity for the FACT-G quality of life questionaire through multidimensional escalation techniques. Vol. 14, Rev Colomb CanCeRol. 2010.
dc.relation.referencesMejía-Rojas ME, Contreras-Rengifo A, Hernández-Carrillo M. Quality of life in women treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer in Cali. Biomedica. 2020;40(2):349–61.
dc.relation.referencesMartín Ortiz C, Domingo J, Pérez S, José M, Carlos J. Revista Colombiana de Psicología. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80401403
dc.relation.referencesMt R, Ii SM. Quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing ambulatory oncologic treatment at the Social Security Institute in 2010. Vol. 10, Mem. Inst. Investig. Cienc. Salud. 2012.
dc.relation.referencesMora CH. Desarrollo un cuestionario para evaluar integralmente la toxicidad financiera en pacientes con cáncer. 2020.
dc.relation.referencesRosario Martínez M, María A, Hernández V, María L, Hernández J, Psicometría L. Psicometría.
dc.relation.referencesMokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737–45.
dc.relation.referencesde Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araújo FS, Hlubocky FJ, et al. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476–84.
dc.relation.referencesLongo CJ. Linking Intermediate to Final “Real-World” Outcomes: Is Financial Toxicity a Reliable Predictor of Poorer Outcomes in Cancer? Current Oncology. 2022 Apr 1;29(4):2483–9.
dc.relation.referencesWitte J, Mehlis K, Surmann B, Lingnau R, Damm O, Greiner W, et al. Methods for measuring financial toxicity after cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review and its implications. Vol. 30, Annals of Oncology. Oxford University Press; 2019. p. 1061–70.
dc.relation.referencesDelgado-Guay M, Ferrer J, Rieber AG, Rhondali W, Tayjasanant S, Ochoa J, et al. Financial Distress and Its Associations With Physical and Emotional Symptoms and Quality of Life Among Advanced Cancer Patients. Oncologist. 2015 Sep 1;20(9):1092–8.
dc.relation.referencesMeneses K, Azuero A, Hassey L, McNees P, Pisu M. Does economic burden influence quality of life in breast cancer survivors? Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):437–43.
dc.relation.referencesLathan CS, Cronin A, Tucker-Seeley R, Zafar SY, Ayanian JZ, Schrag D. Association of financial strain with symptom burden and quality of life for patients with lung or colorectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016 May 20;34(15):1732–40.
dc.relation.referencesFenn KM, Evans SB, Mccorkle R, Digiovanna MP, Pusztai L, Sanft T, et al. Impact of Financial Burden of Cancer on Survivors’ Quality of Life. 2014.
dc.relation.referencesRamsey SD, Bansal A, Fedorenko CR, Blough DK, Overstreet KA, Shankaran V, et al. Financial insolvency as a risk factor for early mortality among patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016 Mar 20;34(9):980–6.
dc.relation.referencesMa SJ, Iovoli AJ, Attwood K, Wooten KE, Arshad H, Gupta V, et al. Association of significant financial burden with survival for head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Oral Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;115.
dc.relation.referencesPerrone F, Jommi C, Di Maio M, Gimigliano A, Gridelli C, Pignata S, et al. The association of financial difficulties with clinical outcomes in cancer patients: Secondary analysis of 16 academic prospective clinical trials conducted in Italy. Annals of Oncology. 2016 Dec 1;27(12):2224–9.
dc.relation.referencesYousuf Zafar S, Mcneil RB, Thomas CM, Lathan CS, Ayanian JZ, Provenzale D. Population-Based Assessment of Cancer Survivors’ Financial Burden and Quality of Life: A Prospective Cohort Study. 2014.
dc.relation.referencesDe Souza JA, Yap BJ, Hlubocky FJ, Wroblewski K, Ratain MJ, Cella D, et al. The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: The COST measure. Cancer. 2014;120(20):3245–53.
dc.relation.referencesYu HH, Bi X, Liu YY. [Reliability and validity of the Chinese version on Comprehensive Scores for Financial Toxicity based on the patient-reported outcome measures]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Aug;38(8):1118–20.
dc.relation.referencesRipamonti CI, Chiesi F, Di Pede P, Guglielmo M, Toffolatti L, Gangeri L, et al. The validation of the Italian version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020;
dc.relation.referencesSharif SP. Psychometric Evaluation of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity Scale Among Iranian Cancer Patients. :1–19.
dc.relation.referencesPrawitz A, Garman E, Benoit S, Barbara O, Kim J, Drentea P. InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale: Development, Administration, and Score Interpretation. Financial Counseling and Planning. 2006 Jan 1;17.
dc.relation.referencesRativa Velandia M. Carga financiera familiar asociada al cuidado del niño con cáncer [Internet]. Available from: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/59848
dc.relation.referencesFava GA, Tomba E, Sonino N. Clinimetrics: The science of clinical measurements. Vol. 66, International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2012. p. 11–5.
dc.relation.referencesMarx RG, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Wright JG. Clinimetric and Psychometric Strategies for Development of a Health Measurement Scale. Vol. 52, J Clin Epidemiol. 1999.
dc.relation.referencesDe Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, Knol D. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. 2011 Sep 7;1–338.
dc.relation.referencesAERA, APA, NCME. Estandares para pruebas educativas y psicologias. AERA; 2018.
dc.relation.referencesStreiner DL, Norman GR CJ. Chapter 8: Reliability. In: Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2015.
dc.relation.referencesRosario Martínez M, María A, Hernández V, María L, Hernández J, Psicometría L. Psicometría.
dc.relation.referencesRevelle W, Condon DM. Reliability from α to ω: A Tutorial.
dc.relation.referencesBerge J, Sočan G. The Greatest Lower Bound to the Reliability of a Test and the Hypothesis of Unidimensionality. Psychometrika. 2004 Feb 1;69:613–25.
dc.relation.referencesMuñiz J. Introducción a la Psicometría: Teoría Clásica y TRI. Pirámide. Madrid; 2018. 340 p
dc.relation.referencesMckelvie S. Review of Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation. Canadian Psychology-psychologie Canadienne - CAN PSYCHOL-PSYCHOL CAN. 2005 Nov 1;46:258–60.
dc.relation.referencesHambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of item response theory. Fundamentals of item response theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc; 1991. 174, x, 174–x p. (Measurement methods for the social sciences series, Vol. 2.).
dc.relation.referencesDevellis RF. Scale Development Fourth Edition 2. 2017.
dc.relation.referencesDeMars C. Item response theory. 2010.
dc.relation.referencesde Ayala RJ. The theory and practice of item response theory. The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2009. 448, xv, 448–xv p. (Methodology in the social sciences.).
dc.relation.referencesEmbretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2000. 371, xi, 371–xi p. (Multivariate Applications Books Series.).
dc.relation.referencesChen WH, Thissen D. Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 1997;22(3):265–89.
dc.relation.referencesMasters GN. A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring. Psychometrika [Internet]. 2025/01/01. 1982;47(2):149–74. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/D7202CB6D2D1593889B1318DD6297E01
dc.relation.referencesZieky MJ. An introduction to the use of evidence-centered design in test development. Psicol Educ (Madr) [Internet]. 2014 Dec;20(2):79–87. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=99836884&lang=es&site=ehost-live
dc.relation.referencesZafar SY, Abernethy AP. Financial toxicity, Part I: a new name for a growing problem. Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Feb;27(2):80–149.
dc.relation.referencesZafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, et al. The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient’s experience. Oncologist. 2013/02/26. 2013;18(4):381–90.
dc.relation.referencesEscobar-Pérez J, Cuervo-Martínez Á. Validez De Contenido Y Juicio De Expertos: Una Aproximación a Su Utilización. Avances en Medición. 2008;6:27–36.
dc.relation.referencesVarni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQLTM 4.0: Reliability and Validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales in Healthy and Patient Populations. Med Care [Internet]. 2001;39(8). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/fulltext/2001/08000/pedsql__4_0__reliability_and_validity_of_the.6.aspx
dc.relation.referencesHu L tze, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55.
dc.relation.referencesSatorra A, Bentler PM. A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis. Psychometrika [Internet]. 2025/01/01. 2001;66(4):507–14. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/19AF108357BB54308F61B26E5DA7607D
dc.relation.referencesSamejima F. Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores. Psychometrika [Internet]. 2025/01/01. 1969;34(S1):1–97. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/87C005F61264FD8360992A8D0FC3FDE0
dc.relation.referencesYen WM. Scaling Performance Assessments: Strategies for Managing Local Item Dependence. Vol. 30, Journal of Educational Measurement Fall. 1993.
dc.relation.referencesLinacre J. What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Meas Trans. 2002 Jan 1;16.
dc.relation.referencesYu HH, Yu ZF, Li H, Zhao H, Sun JM, Liu YY. The COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity in China: Validation and Responsiveness. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jun 1;61(6):1297-1304.e1.
dc.relation.referencesde Alcantara Nogueira L, Koller FJ, Marcondes L, de Fátima Mantovani M, Marcon SS, Guimarães PRB, et al. Validation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity for Brazilian culture. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Dec 18;14.
dc.relation.referencesWang L ling, Xu RH. Development of a rapid tool for screening financial toxicity based on the comprehensive score for financial toxicity. J Cancer Policy [Internet]. 2024;40:100475. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000092
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::613 - Salud y seguridad personal
dc.subject.proposalToxicidad financieraspa
dc.subject.proposalPsicometríaspa
dc.subject.proposalValidación de instrumentosspa
dc.subject.proposalPsicooncologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalMedidas de resultados reportados por los pacienteseng
dc.subject.proposalOncologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalFinancial toxicityeng
dc.subject.proposalPsychometricseng
dc.subject.proposalInstrument validationeng
dc.subject.proposalPsycho- oncologyspa
dc.subject.proposalPatient-reported outcome measureseng
dc.subject.proposalOncologyeng
dc.subject.unescoEconomía de la saludspa
dc.subject.unescoHealth economicseng
dc.subject.unescoCalidad de vidaspa
dc.subject.unescoQuality of lifeeng
dc.subject.unescoPolítica de la saludspa
dc.subject.unescoHealth policyeng
dc.titleConstrucción y validación de un instrumento de medición de toxicidad financiera (TF) en pacientes con cáncer en Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedDevelopment and psychometric validation of a financial toxicity measurement instrument (FT) in cancer patients in Colombiaeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1018472248.2025.pdf
Tamaño:
19.9 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Epidemiología Clínica

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
U.FT.09.006.004 Licencia para publicación de obras en el Repositorio Institucional UNAL v4l.pdf
Tamaño:
131.78 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción: