Evaluación del efecto de la sinceridad de marca en la intención de compra en línea en la plataforma Mercado Libre Colombia

dc.contributor.advisorDuque Oliva, Edison Jair
dc.contributor.authorSarmiento Caro, Nicolas Smith
dc.contributor.researchgroupGriego (Grupo Investigación en Gestión y Organizaciones)
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.coverage.tgnhttp://vocab.getty.edu/page/tgn/1000050
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-02T23:16:36Z
dc.date.available2026-02-02T23:16:36Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-19
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramasspa
dc.description.abstractEste estudio evalúa el efecto de la sinceridad de marca sobre la intención de compra en línea en Mercado Libre Colombia, con un enfoque explícito en audiencias de Generación Z y en el ecosistema de la plataforma. Metodológicamente, se adopta un diseño post-positivista, cuantitativo y transversal, con un cuestionario digital estructurado y un protocolo de depuración documentado; además, el instrumento integra escalas validadas para sinceridad de marca e intención de compra, y el análisis se ejecuta mediante la técnica de mínimos cuadros parciales (PLS-SEM), precedido por una evaluación psicométrica y acompañado de remuestreo para robustecer la inferencia. En términos sustantivos, el modelo confirma trayectorias positivas y estadísticamente sólidas que configuran dos rutas complementarias hacia la intención de compra: una cognitivo-evaluativa, que opera a través de la dimensión Íntegro-Alegre (INIA) derivada de la sinceridad percibida, y otra asociada al control percibido de compra (IC), anclada en señales de honestidad; conjuntamente, ambas vías ofrecen consistencia explicativa y estabilidad diagnóstica. En consecuencia, la conclusión principal sostiene que, en el contexto colombiano analizado, fortalecer señales verificables de honestidad, coherencia y autenticidad en los puntos de contacto de la plataforma incrementa la disposición a comprar, aportando un marco empírico útil para la gestión de comunicación y experiencia de usuario en el comercio electrónico colombiano. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates the effect of brand sincerity on online purchase intent on Mercado Libre Colombia, with an explicit focus on Generation Z audiences and the platform's ecosystem. Methodologically, a post-positivist, quantitative, and cross-sectional design is adopted, with a structured digital questionnaire and a documented cleansing protocol. In addition, the instrument integrates validated scales for brand sincerity and purchase intention, and the analysis is performed using the partial least squares (PLS-SEM) technique, preceded by a psychometric evaluation and accompanied by resampling to strengthen the inference. In substantive terms, the model confirms positive and statistically robust trajectories that form two complementary paths toward purchase intention: one cognitive-evaluative, which operates through the Integrity-Joy (INIA) dimension derived from perceived sincerity, and another associated with perceived purchase control (IC), anchored in signals of honesty. Together, both paths offer explanatory consistency and diagnostic stability. Consequently, the main conclusion holds that, in the Colombian context analyzed, strengthening verifiable signals of honesty, consistency, and authenticity at the platform's touchpoints increases willingness to buy, providing a useful empirical framework for communication and user experience management in Colombian e-commerce.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Administración
dc.description.researchareaGestión funcional - Mercadeo
dc.format.extent94 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89371
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Pública
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administración
dc.relation.referencesAaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151897
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
dc.relation.referencesAlavi, M., Visentin, D. C., Thapa, D. K., Hunt, G. E., Watson, R., & Cleary, M. (2020). Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(9), 2209–2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14399
dc.relation.referencesBartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
dc.relation.referencesBaumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
dc.relation.referencesBentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
dc.relation.referencesBeverland, M. B. (2005). Crafting Brand Authenticity: The Case of Luxury Wines*. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1003–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00530.x
dc.relation.referencesBian, Q., & Forsythe, S. (2012). Purchase intention for luxury brands: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1443–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.010
dc.relation.referencesBrowne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
dc.relation.referencesBryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
dc.relation.referencesCCCE, C. C. de C. E. (2024, abril 28). INFORME DE CIERRE 2023 VERSION PUBLICA. Cámara Colombiana de Comercio Electrónico. https://www.ccce.org.co/gestion_gremial/informe-de-cierre-2023-version-publica/
dc.relation.referencesCheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415130402
dc.relation.referencesClark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
dc.relation.referencesCortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
dc.relation.referencesCostello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
dc.relation.referencesDavies, G., Rojas-Méndez, J. I., Whelan, S., Mete, M., & Loo, T. (2018). Brand personality: Theory and dimensionality. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2017-1499
dc.relation.referencesDimock, M. (2019, enero 17). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
dc.relation.referencesEdelman Trustbarometer. (2019). Trust Barometer Special Report: In Brands We Trust?
dc.relation.referencesErkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003
dc.relation.referencesFabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
dc.relation.referencesFerketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 14(2), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770140211
dc.relation.referencesFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
dc.relation.referencesGhezzi, A., Mangiaracina, R., & Perego, A. (2012). Shaping the E-Commerce Logistics Strategy: A Decision Framework. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4, 13. https://doi.org/10.5772/51647
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation.referencesHandoyo, S. (2024). Purchasing in the digital age: A meta-analytical perspective on trust, risk, security, and e-WOM in e-commerce. Heliyon, 10(8), e29714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29714
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
dc.relation.referencesHenson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
dc.relation.referencesHorn, J. L. (1965). A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
dc.relation.referencesHu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
dc.relation.referencesHu, T., & Shi, B. (2020). More Proximal, More Willing to Purchase: The Mechanism for Variability in Consumers’ Purchase Intention Toward Sincere vs. Exciting Brands. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01258
dc.relation.referencesHyun, H., Park, J., & Hong, E. (2024). Enhancing brand equity through multidimensional brand authenticity in the fashion retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103712
dc.relation.referencesKaiser, H. F. (1958). The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
dc.relation.referencesKaiser, H. F. (1960). The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
dc.relation.referencesKaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
dc.relation.referencesKalakota, R., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). Electronic Commerce: A Manager’s Guide. Addison-Wesley Professional.
dc.relation.referencesKhwaja, M. G., Mahmood, S., & Zaman, U. (2020). Examining the Effects of eWOM, Trust Inclination, and Information Adoption on Purchase Intentions in an Accelerated Digital Marketing Context. Information, 11(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100478
dc.relation.referencesKim, J. H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087
dc.relation.referencesKock, N. (2015). Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
dc.relation.referencesKock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
dc.relation.referencesKumar, A., Lee, H.-J., & Kim, Y.-K. (2009). Indian consumers’ purchase intention toward a United States versus local brand. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.018
dc.relation.referencesLeong, C.-M., Loi, A. M.-W., & Woon, S. (2022). The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00132-9
dc.relation.referencesLevin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., Huang, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, L., Ren, Y., & Chen, R. (2024). Sentiment Analysis Using E-Commerce Review Keyword-Generated Image with a Hybrid Machine Learning-Based Model. Computers, Materials & Continua, 80(1), 1581–1599. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.052666
dc.relation.referencesLinh, T. T., & Huyen, N. T. T. (2025). An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the adoption of digital payment: An empirical study in Vietnam. F1000Research, 14, 127. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157763.3
dc.relation.referencesMacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
dc.relation.referencesMaiti, S. S., & Mukherjee, B. N. (1990). A Note on Distributional Properties of the Jöreskog-Sörbom Fit Indices. Psychometrika, 55(4), 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294619
dc.relation.referencesMarcoulides, K. M., & Raykov, T. (2019). Evaluation of Variance Inflation Factors in Regression Models Using Latent Variable Modeling Methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(5), 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418817803
dc.relation.referencesMcKinsey, G. I. (2021). The new digital edge: Rethinking strategy for the post-pandemic era.
dc.relation.referencesMercado Libre, Inc. (2022, diciembre 3). Mercado Libre registra ingresos netos y rentabilidad operativa récords en el segundo trimestre. Mercado Libre. https://www.mercadolibre.com.co/institucional/comunicamos/noticias/www.mercadolibre.com.co/institucional/comunicamos/noticias/reporte-financiero-segundo-trimestre-2022
dc.relation.referencesMercado Libre, Inc. (2024). Q3’24 Results ; Investor Presentation (p. 26). https://investor.mercadolibre.com/sites/mercadolibre/files/mercadolibre/results/MELI-Q3-24-Earnings-Presentation.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMontecchi, M., Plangger, K., West, D., & de Ruyter, K. (2024a). Perceived brand transparency: A conceptualization and measurement scale. Psychology & Marketing, 41(10), 2274–2297. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22048
dc.relation.referencesMontecchi, M., Plangger, K., West, D., & de Ruyter, K. (2024b). Perceived brand transparency: A conceptualization and measurement scale. Psychology & Marketing, 41(10), 2274–2297. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22048
dc.relation.referencesNapoli, J., Dickinson-Delaporte, S., & Beverland, M. B. (2016). The brand authenticity continuum: Strategic approaches for building value. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(13–14), 1201–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1145722
dc.relation.referencesNielsen Inc. (2023). 2023-Consumer-Survey-Report (p. 28). https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/11/2023-Consumer-Survey-Report.pdf
dc.relation.referencesO’brien, R. M. (2007). A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
dc.relation.referencesPark, J., Hong, E., & Park, Y. (2023). Toward a new business model of retail industry: The role of brand experience and brand authenticity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103426
dc.relation.referencesPratomo, L. A., & Magetsari, O. N. N. (2020). Exploring the Consequences of Brand Authenticity. 336–339. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200915.075
dc.relation.referencesRaykov, T. (1997). Estimation of Composite Reliability for Congeneric Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970212006
dc.relation.referencesRosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
dc.relation.referencesRup, B. K., Gochhayat, J., & Samanta, S. (2021). Revisiting Brand Personality Attributes: Mediating Role of Brand Attitude. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 12(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.20210401.oa8
dc.relation.referencesSalhab, H. A., Al-Amarneh, A., Aljabaly, S. M., Al Zoubi, M. M., & Othman, M. D. (2023). The impact of social media marketing on purchase intention: The mediating role of brand trust and image. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(2), 591–600. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.3.012
dc.relation.referencesSaunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.referencesSelya, A. S., Rose, J. S., Dierker, L. C., Hedeker, D., & Mermelstein, R. J. (2012). A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen’s f2, a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111
dc.relation.referencesShams, R., Chatterjee, S., & Chaudhuri, R. (2024). Developing brand identity and sales strategy in the digital era: Moderating role of consumer belief in brand. Journal of Business Research, 179, 114689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114689
dc.relation.referencesSörbom, D. (1989). Model Modification. Psychometrika, 54(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294623
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using Effect Size—Or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
dc.relation.referencesSun, Y., Wang, R., Cao, D., & Lee, R. (2022). Who are social media influencers for luxury fashion consumption of the Chinese Gen Z? Categorisation and empirical examination. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(4), 603–621. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2020-0132
dc.relation.referencesSung, K. S. K., & Lee, S. (2023). Customer brand co-creation behavior and brand sincerity through CSR interactivity: The role of psychological implications in service-dominant logic. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103388
dc.relation.referencesTavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
dc.relation.referencesTirocchi, S. (2023). Generation Z, values, and media: From influencers to BeReal, between visibility and authenticity. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1304093
dc.relation.referencesTran, T.-V. T., Ho, Q. N., Nguyen, N.-T., Le, T.-P., & Nguyen, H.-A. D. (2023). Investigation Factors of Brand Personality Affecting on Purchase Intentions Towards Authentic Agricultural Products in Vietnam. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 21, 70–70. https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-21-2023-70
dc.relation.referencesTucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
dc.relation.referencesUNCTAD, U. N. C. on T. and D. (2024). Chapter V: E-commerce and environmental sustainability. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2024_ch05_en.pdf
dc.relation.referencesValette-Florence, R., & De Barnier, V. (2013). Towards a micro conception of brand personality: An application for print media brands in a French context. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.008
dc.relation.referencesWalter, N., Föhl, U., Sander, F., & Nies, A. (2024). Act as you preach! Authentic brand purpose versus “woke washing’s” impact on brand credibility: The moderating role of cause involvement and consumer skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 184, 114868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114868
dc.relation.referencesXu, Y., Du, J., Shahzad, F., & Li, X. (2021). Untying the Influence of Green Brand Authenticity on Electronic Word-of-Mouth Intention: A Moderation–Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724452
dc.relation.referencesXue, J., Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., & Majeed, S. (2020). Do Brand Competence and Warmth Always Influence Purchase Intention? The Moderating Role of Gender. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00248
dc.relation.referencesYang, J., Teran, C., Battocchio, A. F., Bertellotti, E., & Wrzesinski, S. (2021). Building Brand Authenticity on Social Media: The Impact of Instagram Ad Model Genuineness and Trustworthiness on Perceived Brand Authenticity and Consumer Responses. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 21(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1860168
dc.relation.referencesZaman, U., Bolia, B., & Anjam, M. (2021). Do women customers love to talk about financial brands? An empirical evidence on the mediated service responsiveness and brand sincerity in creating a positive word of mouth. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1945426. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1945426
dc.relation.referencesZinko, R., Patrick, A., Furner, C. P., Gaines, S., Kim, M. D., Negri, M., Orellana, E., Torres, S., & Villarreal, C. (2021). Responding to Negative Electronic Word of Mouth to Improve Purchase Intention. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060109
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc380 - Comercio , comunicaciones, transporte::382 - Comercio internacional (Comercio exterior)
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología::158 - Psicología aplicadaspa
dc.subject.proposalSinceridad de marcaspa
dc.subject.proposalIntención de compraspa
dc.subject.proposalComercio electrónicospa
dc.subject.proposalGeneración Zspa
dc.subject.proposalPLS-SEMspa
dc.subject.proposalBrand sincerityeng
dc.subject.proposalPurchase intentioneng
dc.subject.proposalE-commerceeng
dc.subject.proposalGeneration Zeng
dc.subject.proposalLS-SEMeng
dc.subject.unescoEstudio de mercadospa
dc.subject.unescoMarket researcheng
dc.subject.unescoComercio electrónicospa
dc.subject.unescoElectronic commercespa
dc.subject.wikidatacomportamiento del consumidorspa
dc.subject.wikidataconsumer behavioreng
dc.titleEvaluación del efecto de la sinceridad de marca en la intención de compra en línea en la plataforma Mercado Libre Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedEvaluation of the effect of brand sincerity on online purchase intention on the Mercado Libre Colombia platformeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1014303950.2025.pdf
Tamaño:
1001.31 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Administración

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: