Dinámicas colaborativas entre los actores del ecosistema de innovación en Caldas en pro de la sostenibilidad : una investigación exploratoria

dc.contributor.advisorVieira Salazar, Jaime
dc.contributor.advisorRoncancio Marín, Jason
dc.contributor.authorNarváez Arias, Sebastián
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-14T14:07:23Z
dc.date.available2025-10-14T14:07:23Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptiongraficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractEste estudio analiza las dinámicas colaborativas entre universidad, empresa, gobierno y sociedad civil en el ecosistema de innovación de Caldas, bajo el enfoque de la cuádruple hélice. A partir de 25 entrevistas semiestructuradas, codificadas y analizadas con Atlas.ti, se identificaron 20 códigos agrupados en facilitadores y barreras que condicionan la sostenibilidad regional. Los resultados muestran que los facilitadores predominantes —mejora de procesos, colaboración interinstitucional y conocimiento aplicado— tienen el potencial de impulsar transformaciones significativas cuando se articulan de manera estratégica. No obstante, barreras como los costos altos, la falta de financiación, la burocracia y las limitaciones regulatorias frenan la escalabilidad de los proyectos. Se propone un conjunto de recomendaciones en los niveles de política pública, gestión organizacional y participación comunitaria para potenciar las fortalezas existentes y reducir las restricciones estructurales. La investigación concluye que el éxito del ecosistema dependerá de su capacidad para convertir la cooperación interinstitucional en una práctica permanente, sostenida por políticas flexibles, financiamiento adecuado y una cultura de innovación inclusiva (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstract“Collaborative Dynamics Among Stakeholders in the Caldas Innovation Ecosystem for Sustainability: An Exploratory Investigation.” This study examines collaborative dynamics among universities, businesses, government, and civil society within the Caldas innovation ecosystem, using the quadruple helix framework. Based on 25 semi-structured interviews, coded and analyzed with Atlas.ti, the research identified 20 codes grouped into facilitators and barriers shaping regional sustainability. Findings show that predominant facilitators—process improvement, inter-institutional collaboration, and applied knowledge—can drive significant transformations when strategically aligned. However, barriers such as high costs, lack of funding, bureaucracy, and regulatory constraints hinder project scalability. A set of recommendations is proposed at the public policy, organizational management, and 7 community participation levels to strengthen existing assets and reduce structural constraints. The study concludes that the ecosystem’s success will depend on its ability to make inter-institutional cooperation a permanent practice, supported by flexible policies, adequate financing, and an inclusive innovation culture.eng
dc.description.curricularareaAdministración.Sede Manizales
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Administración de Empresas
dc.description.researchareaInnovación y Sostenibilidad con enfoque metodológico cualitativo, una investigación exploratoria.
dc.format.extent93 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89028
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizales
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Administración
dc.publisher.placeManizales, Colombia
dc.publisher.programManizales - Administración - Maestría en Administración
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, R., & Grazzi, M. (2018). Innovation and SME financing in Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank.
dc.relation.referencesArnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring the quadruple helix: Outlining user-oriented innovation models. University of Tampere, Working Papers.
dc.relation.referencesAutio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
dc.relation.referencesCalderón-Hernández, G., Jiménez-Zapata, Y. A., & Serna-Gómez, H. M. (2020). Barriers to University Spin-Off Creation in an Emerging Context: An Institutional Theory of Organizations Approach. Minerva, 58(4), 625–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09406-1
dc.relation.referencesCarayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, Quadruple helix and Quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
dc.relation.referencesCarayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesCarayannis, E. G., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2016.1.31.42
dc.relation.referencesCassiolato, J. E., & Lastres, H. M. M. (2008). Local, national and regional systems of innovation in the MERCOSUR. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 4(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2008.016184
dc.relation.referencesCavallini, S., Soldi, R., Friedl, J., & Volpe, M. (2016). Using the Quadruple Helix Approach to Accelerate the Transfer of Research and Innovation Results to Regional Growth. European Union/Committee of the Regions.
dc.relation.referencesCEPAL. (2020). La inversión en investigación y desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. https://www.cepal.org/es
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
dc.relation.referencesClarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014
dc.relation.referencesCrespi, G., & Zúñiga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from Latin American firms. World Development, 40(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010
dc.relation.referencesCrespi, G., Fernández-Arias, E., & Stein, E. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking productive development: Sound policies and institutions for economic transformation. Inter-American Development Bank/Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesCrespi, G., Maffioli, A., & Meléndez, M. (2019). Public support to innovation: The Colombian experience (IDB Working Paper Series). Inter-American Development Bank.
dc.relation.referencesDutrénit, G. (2017). Learning, capability building and innovation systems in developing countries. Edward Elgar.
dc.relation.referencesDutrénit, G., Capdevielle, M., Corona, J. M., & Puchet, M. (2016). Innovation and development in Mexico: From policy to practice. Science and Public Policy, 43(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw008
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
dc.relation.referencesElkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
dc.relation.referencesGeissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
dc.relation.referencesGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesGodet, M. (2006). Creating futures: Scenario planning as a strategic management tool. Economica.
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Herrera, F. (2017). Innovation practices in emerging economies: Do university partnerships matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 615–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9578-8
dc.relation.referencesJackson, D. J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? (White paper). National Science Foundation.
dc.relation.referencesLeydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/23.5.279
dc.relation.referencesLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, A., & Lugones, G. (2018). Políticas de ciencia, tecnología e innovación en América Latina. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es
dc.relation.referencesMalaver, F., & Vargas, M. (2013). Innovación y desempeño empresarial en Colombia: Evidencia y desafíos de política. Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Documento de trabajo).
dc.relation.referencesMedina, J. (2012). Prospectiva: Herramienta para la construcción del futuro. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesMoore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
dc.relation.referencesMulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
dc.relation.referencesNahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2020). OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Colombia 2020. OECD Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesPerkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
dc.relation.referencesPutnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
dc.relation.referencesRobledo, J., Orozco, J., & Valencia, F. (2018). Ruta N: Lessons from Medellín’s innovation ecosystem. Universidad de los Andes (Reporte).
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
dc.relation.referencesRubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(3), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2017-0006
dc.relation.referencesSachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSaxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSchaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682
dc.relation.referencesSchot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
dc.relation.referencesStake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesWorld Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesZetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2017). Regulating a revolution: From regulatory sandboxes to smart regulation. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 23(1), 31–103.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::338 - Producción
dc.subject.proposalEcosistema de innovaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalCuádruple hélicespa
dc.subject.proposalSostenibilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalColaboración interinstitucionalspa
dc.subject.proposalMejora de procesosspa
dc.subject.proposalPolíticas públicasspa
dc.subject.proposalCaldasspa
dc.subject.proposalInnovation ecosystemeng
dc.subject.proposalQuadruple helixeng
dc.subject.proposalSustainabilityeng
dc.subject.proposalInter-institutional collaborationeng
dc.subject.proposalProcess improvementeng
dc.subject.proposalPublic policyeng
dc.subject.unescoDesarrollo sostenible
dc.subject.unescoSustainable development
dc.subject.unescoInnovación científica
dc.subject.unescoScientific innovations
dc.titleDinámicas colaborativas entre los actores del ecosistema de innovación en Caldas en pro de la sostenibilidad : una investigación exploratoriaspa
dc.title.translatedCollaborative dynamics among stakeholders in the caldas innovation ecosystem for sustainability : an exploratory investigationeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentBibliotecarios
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis de Maestría en Administración.pdf
Tamaño:
1.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Administración

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: