Relación entre el aprendizaje estadístico y la lectoescritura en niños con dislexia en una ortografía transparente

dc.contributor.advisorLara Diaz, María Fernandaspa
dc.contributor.authorMateus Moreno, Angélicaspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGRUPO DE NEUROCIENCIAS-UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIAspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-22T14:24:18Zspa
dc.date.available2020-07-22T14:24:18Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-04-29spa
dc.description.abstractLa naturaleza de las dificultades de lectura, específicamente de la dislexia aún no es clara, por ello desde diferentes perspectivas incluida la neurociencia cognitiva, se ha buscado identificar los factores emergentes que se relacionan con la presencia de dicha dificultad, con el fin de mejorar los procesos de identificación y orientar futuras intervenciones terapéuticas. Recientemente se ha descrito el rendimiento en tareas de aprendizaje estadístico (AE) (Spencer, Kaschak, Jones, y Lonigan, 2015) como factor que se relaciona con las habilidades lectoras en ortografías opacas como el inglés, mostrando que niños que presentan dificultades de lectura como la dislexia, presentan un rendimiento menor en AE. Sin embargo, estas relaciones no son muy claras aún en ortografías transparentes como el español, donde existe mayor concordancia en la relación grafema - fonema, por lo que puede existir una menor necesidad de hacer uso de estrategias implícitas para favorecer el proceso de alfabetización. La presente investigación buscó identificar la influencia del aprendizaje estadístico en una ortografía transparente como el español en niños de 9 a 12 años con y sin dislexia y las relaciones que pueden existir con el desempeño en lectura y escritura. Se evidencia un rendimiento menor para tareas de AE en niños con dislexia en comparación con sus controles, siendo la precisión para tareas de AE una variable predictora en procesos de lectura y escritura en español. Esta investigación avanza en el proceso de clarificación sobre la naturaleza de la dificultad y la comprensión de la influencia del AE en el aprendizaje de la lectura y la escritura; de igual forma, favorece la identificación de las dificultades lectoras, su manejo terapéutico y la innovación en prácticas pedagógicas desde la visión del AE.spa
dc.description.abstractThe nature of reading difficulties, specifically of dyslexia is not yet clear, therefore from different perspectives, including cognitive neuroscience has sought to identify emerging factors that are related to the presence of such difficulty, in order to improve processes of identification and guide future therapeutic interventions. Recently, performance in statistical learning tasks (AE) (Spencer, Kaschak, Jones, & Lonigan, 2015) has been described as a factor that relates to reading skills in opaque orthography such as English, showing that children who have reading difficulties like dyslexia, they have a lower performance in AE. However, these relationships are not very clear even in transparent spellings such as Spanish, where there is greater concordance between grapheme and phoneme, so there may be less need to make use of implicit strategies to favor the literacy process. This research seeks to identify the influence of statistical learning in a transparent spelling such as Spanish in children aged 9 to 12 years with and without dyslexia and the relationships that may exist with reading and writing performance. There is a lower performance for AE tasks in children with dyslexia, the accuracy for AE tasks being a predictive variable in reading and writing processes in Spanish. This investigation advances in the process of clarification on the nature of the difficulty and the understanding of the influence of AE in the learning of reading and writing. Likewise, it favors the identification of reading difficulties and their therapeutic management and innovation in pedagogical practices from the AE's perspective.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent111spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationMateus-Moreno, A. (2020). Relación entre el aprendizaje estadístico y la lectoescritura en niños con dislexia en una ortografía transparente (tesis de maestría). Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77818
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Maestría en Neurocienciasspa
dc.relation.referencesAdlof, S., y Hogan, T. (2018). Understanding Dyslexia in the Context of Developmental Language Disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 762-773. doi:doi:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0049spa
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J. (2018). Reading as Statistical Learning. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3s), 634-643. doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-stlt1-17-0135spa
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J., y Conway, C. (2018). The Promise and Challenge of Statistical Learning for Elucidating Atypical Language Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 492-500. doi:10.1177/0963721418779977spa
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J., y Simpson, I. (2011). Statistical learning in typically developing children: the role of age and speed of stimulus presentation. Developmental science, 14(3), 464-473. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00937.xspa
dc.relation.referencesArciuli, J., y Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical Learning Is Related to Reading Ability in Children and Adults. Cognitive science, 36(2), 286-304. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01200.xspa
dc.relation.referencesAshby, F. G., y Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human Category Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 149-178. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217spa
dc.relation.referencesBeck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., y Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction: Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBergmann, J., y Wimmer, H. (2008). A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: Evidence from phonological and orthographic lexical decisions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(5), 653-676. doi:10.1080/02643290802221404spa
dc.relation.referencesBishop, D. V., y Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychol Bulletin, 130(6), 858-886. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858spa
dc.relation.referencesCabbage, K. L., Farquharson, K., Iuzzini-Seigel, J., Zuk, J., y Hogan, T. (2018). Exploring the overlap between dyslexia and speech sound production deficits. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 774-786. doi:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0008spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, C.-H., y Yu, C. (2017). Grounding statistical learning in context: The effects of learning and retrieval contexts on cross-situational word learning. Psychonomic bulletin y review, 24(3), 920-926. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1163-xspa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L., y Dehaene, S. (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 22(1), 466-476. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, C., Gregg, N., McLain, L., y Bellair, L. W. (2009). A Comparison of Spelling Performance Across Young Adults With and Without Dyslexia. Assessment for effective intervention, 34(2), 94-105. doi:10.1177/1534508408318808spa
dc.relation.referencesColenbrander, D., Ricketts, J., y Breadmore, H. L. (2018). Early identification of dyslexia: Understanding the issues. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 817-828.spa
dc.relation.referencesColtheart, M. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual-route approach. The science of reading: A handbook, 6-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesConnelly, V., Campbell, S., MacLean, M., y Barnes, J. (2006). Contribution of Lower Order Skills to the Written Composition of College Students With and Without Dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 175-196. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_9spa
dc.relation.referencesConway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., y Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114(3), 356-371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.009spa
dc.relation.referencesConway, C. M., y Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 24-39. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24spa
dc.relation.referencesCuetos, F., Ramos, J., y Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC. Evaluación de los procesos de escritura. Madrid: TEA.spa
dc.relation.referencesCuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., y Arribas, D. (2007). Prolec-R: Evaluación de los procesos lectores–revisado. Madrid: TEA.spa
dc.relation.referencesCuetos, F., y Vega, F. C. (2010). Psicología de la lectura: WK Educación.spa
dc.relation.referencesD'Mello, A. M., y Gabrieli, J. D. (2018). Cognitive Neuroscience of Dyslexia. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 798-809. doi:doi:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0020spa
dc.relation.referencesDaltrozzo, J., y Conway, C. M. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 437. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00437spa
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, D. K., y Neuman, S. B. (2007). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2): Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuff, F. J., Reen, G., Plunkett, K., y Nation, K. (2015). Do infant vocabulary skills predict school-age language and literacy outcomes? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(8), 848-856. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12378spa
dc.relation.referencesElleman, A. M., Steacy, L. M., y Compton, D. L. (2019). The Role of Statistical Learning in Word Reading and Spelling Development: More Questions Than Answers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 1-7. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1549045spa
dc.relation.referencesEmberson, L. L., y Rubinstein, D. Y. (2016). Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least). Cognition, 153, 63-78. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.010spa
dc.relation.referencesErickson, L. C., y Thiessen, E. D. (2015). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review, 37, 66-108. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, J. L., Saffran, J. R., y Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 321-335. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0189)spa
dc.relation.referencesFarquharson, K., Centanni, T. M., Franzluebbers, C. E., y Hogan, T. P. (2014). Phonological and lexical influences on phonological awareness in children with specific language impairment and dyslexia. Frontiers in psychology, 5(838). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00838spa
dc.relation.referencesFiser, J., y Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 458-467. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.458spa
dc.relation.referencesFrost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N., y Christiansen, M. H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(3), 117-125. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010spa
dc.relation.referencesFrost, R., Katz, L., y Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104-115. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104spa
dc.relation.referencesGabrieli, J. D. (2009). Dyslexia: a new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325(5938), 280-283. doi:10.1126/science.1171999spa
dc.relation.referencesGebhart, A. L., Newport, E. L., y Aslin, R. N. (2009). Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds. Psychonomic bulletin y review, 16(3), 486-490. doi:10.3758/pbr.16.3.486spa
dc.relation.referencesGrunow, H., Spaulding, T. J., Gómez, R. L., y Plante, E. (2006). The effects of variation on learning word order rules by adults with and without language-based learning disabilities. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(2), 158-170. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.11.004spa
dc.relation.referencesHarm, M. W., y Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading: Cooperative Division of Labor Between Visual and Phonological Processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662-720. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662spa
dc.relation.referencesHayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and Remodeling Writing. Written communication, 29(3), 369-388. doi:10.1177/0741088312451260spa
dc.relation.referencesHayes, J. R., y Flower, L. (1981). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis: ERIC Clearinghouse.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmes, V. M. (2009). Bottom-up processing and reading comprehension in experienced adult readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(3), 309-326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01396.xspa
dc.relation.referencesHolopainen, L., Ahonen, T., y Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting Delay in Reading Achievement in a Highly Transparent Language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 401-413. doi:10.1177/002221940103400502spa
dc.relation.referencesHorowitz-Kraus, T., y Hutton, J. S. (2015). From emergent literacy to reading: how learning to read changes a child's brain. Acta Paediatrica, 104(7), 648-656. doi:10.1111/apa.13018spa
dc.relation.referencesHoward, D. V., y Howard, J. H., Jr. (1992). Adult age differences in the rate of learning serial patterns: evidence from direct and indirect tests. Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 232-241. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.7.2.232spa
dc.relation.referencesHulme, C., y Snowling, M. J. (2016). Reading disorders and dyslexia. Current opinion in pediatrics, 28(6), 731-735. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411spa
dc.relation.referencesJiménez-Fernández, G., Vaquero, J. M., Jiménez, L., y Defior, S. (2011). Dyslexic children show deficits in implicit sequence learning, but not in explicit sequence learning or contextual cueing. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 85-110. doi:10.1007/s11881-010-0048-3spa
dc.relation.referencesKaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., y Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321-340. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011spa
dc.relation.referencesKirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., y Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83(2), B35-B42. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00004-5spa
dc.relation.referencesKovelman, I., Yip, J., y Beck, E. (2011). Cortical systems that process language, as revealed by non-native speech sound perception. NeuroReport, 22(18), 947-950. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834cdc26spa
dc.relation.referencesKüçükoğlu, H. (2013). Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 709-714. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.113spa
dc.relation.referencesLanger, N., Benjamin, C., Minas, J., y Gaab, N. (2013). The neural correlates of reading fluency deficits in children. Cerebral Cortex, 25(6), 1441-1453. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht330spa
dc.relation.referencesLara, M., Aguilar, E., y Serra, M. (2007). Prueba de procesamiento fonológico (PROFON). Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesLyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., y Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1-14. doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9spa
dc.relation.referencesMalatesha Joshi, R. (2005). Vocabulary: A Critical Component of Comprehension. Reading y Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209-219. doi:10.1080/10573560590949278spa
dc.relation.referencesMcClelland, J. L., Botvinick, M. M., Noelle, D. C., Plaut, D. C., Rogers, T. T., Seidenberg, M. S., y Smith, L. B. (2010). Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 348-356. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002spa
dc.relation.referencesMorken, F., y Helland, T. (2013). Writing in Dyslexia: Product and Process. Dyslexia, 19(3), 131-148. doi:10.1002/dys.1455spa
dc.relation.referencesMortensen, J. A. (2009). Children's Perceptions of the Graphic Features They Use to Differentiate Writing from Drawing. University of Nevada, Reno.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorton, J., y Frith, U. (2001). Why we need cognition: Cause and developmental disorder. Language, brain, cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler 263.spa
dc.relation.referencesNigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I. C., y Defior, S. J. A. o. D. (2016). Implicit learning of non-linguistic and linguistic regularities in children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(2), 202-218. doi:10.1007/s11881-015-0116-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesNigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I.C. et al. Implicit Learning of Written Regularities and Its Relation to Literacy Acquisition in a Shallow Orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(5), 571-585. doi:10.1007/s10936-014-9303-9spa
dc.relation.referencesNissen, M. J., y Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8spa
dc.relation.referencesNorton, E. S., Beach, S. D., y Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2015). Neurobiology of dyslexia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 30, 73-78. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.007spa
dc.relation.referencesPacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., y Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 401-426. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401spa
dc.relation.referencesPaulesu E, Démonet JF, Fazio F, McCrory E, Chanoine V, Brunswick N, Cappa SF, Cossu G, Habib M, Frith CD, Frith U. C. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291(5511), 2165-2167. doi: 10.1126/science.1057179spa
dc.relation.referencesPerfetti, C. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. The neurocognition of language, 167, 208.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerfetti, C. A., Landi, N., y Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. The science of reading: A handbook, 227-247.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerruchet, P., y Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 233-238. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006spa
dc.relation.referencesPoldrack, R. A., y Rodriguez, P. (2004). How do memory systems interact? Evidence from human classification learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 324-332. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesPugh, K. (2006). A neurocognitive overview of reading acquisition and dyslexia across languages. Journal of Developmental science, 9(5), 448-450. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00528.xspa
dc.relation.referencesQi, Z., Sanchez Araujo, Y., Georgan, W. C., Gabrieli, J. D. E., y Arciuli, J. (2019). Hearing Matters More Than Seeing: A Cross-Modality Study of Statistical Learning and Reading Ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 101-115. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1485680spa
dc.relation.referencesReber, A. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 6(6), 855-863.spa
dc.relation.referencesReichle, E. D., Tokowicz, N., Liu, Y., y Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. Psychophysiology, 48(7), 993-1003. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01169.xspa
dc.relation.referencesRello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., y Llisterri, J. (2017). A resource of errors written in Spanish by people with dyslexia and its linguistic, phonetic and visual analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51(2), 379-408. doi: 10.1007/s10579-015-9329-0spa
dc.relation.referencesRichlan, F., Kronbichler, M., y Wimmer, H. (2011). Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions in dyslexic children and adults. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1735-1742. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.040spa
dc.relation.referencesRomberg, A. R., y Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906-914. doi:10.1002/wcs.78spa
dc.relation.referencesRutter M1, Caspi A, Fergusson D, Horwood LJ, Goodman R, Maughan B, Moffitt TE, Meltzer H, Carroll J. (2004). Sex Differences in Developmental Reading DisabilityNew Findings From 4 Epidemiological Studies. JAMA, 291(16), 2007-2012. doi:10.1001/jama.291.16.2007 %J JAMAspa
dc.relation.referencesSaffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., y Newport, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928.spa
dc.relation.referencesSawi, O. M., y Rueckl, J. (2019). Reading and the Neurocognitive Bases of Statistical Learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 8-23. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1457681spa
dc.relation.referencesSchapiro, A. C., Gregory, E., Landau, B., McCloskey, M., y Turk-Browne, N. B. (2014). The Necessity of the Medial Temporal Lobe for Statistical Learning. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 26(8), 1736-1747. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00578spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmalz, X., Altoè, G., y Mulatti, C. J. A. o. D. (2017). Statistical learning and dyslexia: a systematic review. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(2), 147-162. doi:10.1007/s11881-016-0136-0spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmalz, X., Moll, K., Mulatti, C., y Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). Is Statistical Learning Ability Related to Reading Ability, and If So, Why? Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 64-76. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1482304spa
dc.relation.referencesSerrano, F., y Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 81. doi:10.1007/s11881-008-0013-6spa
dc.relation.referencesSeymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., y network, c. w. C. A. A. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of psychology, 94(2), 143-174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859spa
dc.relation.referencesShare, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an" outlier" orthography. Psychological bulletin, 134(4), 584. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584.spa
dc.relation.referencesSiegelman, N., y Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105-120. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001spa
dc.relation.referencesSnow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an RyD program in reading comprehension: Rand Corporation.spa
dc.relation.referencesSnowling, M. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7(1), 37-46. doi:10.1002/dys.185spa
dc.relation.referencesSnowling, M. (2014). Dyslexia: A language learning impairment. Journal of the British Academy, 2(1), 43-58. doi: 10.5871/jba/002.043spa
dc.relation.referencesSnowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Nash, H. M., y Hulme, C. (2016). Language profiles and literacy outcomes of children with resolving, emerging, or persisting language impairments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(12), 1360-1369. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12497spa
dc.relation.referencesSpencer, M., Kaschak, M. P., Jones, J. L., y Lonigan, C. J. (2015). Statistical learning is related to early literacy-related skills. Reading and Writing, 28(4), 467-490. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9533-0spa
dc.relation.referencesStanovich, K. E. (1989). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 360-407.spa
dc.relation.referencesStavonich, K., y Siegel, L. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of reading-disabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesSzegedi-Hallgató, E., Janacsek, K., y Nemeth, D. (2019). Different levels of statistical learning - Hidden potentials of sequence learning tasks. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0221966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221966spa
dc.relation.referencesTan, L.-H., y Perfetti, C. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing, 10(3-5), 165-200.spa
dc.relation.referencesThiessen, E. D. (2017). What's statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 372(1711), 20160056. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0056spa
dc.relation.referencesThiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., y Hufnagle, D. G. (2013). The extraction and integration framework: a two-process account of statistical learning. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 792-814. doi:10.1037/a0030801spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson, P. A., Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Hayiou-Thomas, E., y Snowling, M. J. (2015). Developmental dyslexia: predicting individual risk. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 56(9), 976-987. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12412spa
dc.relation.referencesTorkildsen, J. v. K., Arciuli, J., y Wie, O. B. (2019). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children's reading ability in a semi-transparent orthography. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 60-68. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.003spa
dc.relation.referencesTreiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children: Oxford University Press on Demand.spa
dc.relation.referencesTreiman, R. (2018). Statistical Learning and Spelling. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3s), 644-652. doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-stlt1-17-0122spa
dc.relation.referencesTurk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., y Johnson, M. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 21(10), 1934-1945. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21131spa
dc.relation.referencesVan der Kleij, S. W., Groen, M. A., Segers, E., y Verhoeven, L. (2019). Sequential Implicit Learning Ability Predicts Growth in Reading Skills in Typical Readers and Children with Dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 77-88. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1491582spa
dc.relation.referencesVandermosten, M., Wouters, J., Ghesquière, P., y Golestani, N. (2019). Statistical Learning of Speech Sounds in Dyslexic and Typical Reading Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 116-127. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1473404spa
dc.relation.referencesVellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., y Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 45(1), 2-40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.xspa
dc.relation.referencesVieiro, P., y Gómez, I. (2004). Psicología de la lectura. España: Editorial Pearson.spa
dc.relation.referencesWaldie, K. E., Haigh, C. E., Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Buckley, J., y Kirk, I. J. (2013). Reading the Wrong Way with the Right Hemisphere. Brain sciences, 3(3), 1060-1075. doi: 10.3390/brainsci3031060spa
dc.relation.referencesWaldie, K. E., Wilson, A. J., Roberts, R. P., y Moreau, D. (2017). Reading network in dyslexia: Similar, yet different. Brain and Language, 174, 29-41. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.07.004spa
dc.relation.referencesWimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(1), 1-33. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010122spa
dc.relation.referencesXie, Q., Gao, X., y King, R. B. (2013). Thinking styles in implicit and explicit learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 267-271. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.014spa
dc.relation.referencesYang, J., y Li, P. (2012). Brain Networks of Explicit and Implicit Learning. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e42993. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042993spa
dc.relation.referencesYu, C. (2008). A Statistical Associative Account of Vocabulary Growth in Early Word Learning. Language Learning and Development, 4(1), 32-62. doi:10.1080/15475440701739353spa
dc.relation.referencesZiegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., y Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107(1), 151-178. doi:https:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.004spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología::158 - Psicología aplicadaspa
dc.subject.ddc370 - Educaciónspa
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y saludspa
dc.subject.proposalStatistical Learningeng
dc.subject.proposalLecturaspa
dc.subject.proposalMovimientos ocularesspa
dc.subject.proposalReadingeng
dc.subject.proposalEye Movementseng
dc.subject.proposalOrtografía transparentespa
dc.subject.proposalDislexiaspa
dc.subject.proposalDyslexiaeng
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje estadísticospa
dc.subject.proposalOrthographic transparencyeng
dc.titleRelación entre el aprendizaje estadístico y la lectoescritura en niños con dislexia en una ortografía transparentespa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1.023.929.587.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
2.01 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.9 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: