Evaluación de la adopción del teletrabajo y sus implicaciones en la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones de Medellín

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorBotero Botero, Sergio
dc.contributor.advisorMontoya Restrepo, Iván Alonso
dc.contributor.authorSilva Cortés, Alejandro
dc.contributor.orcidMontoya Restrepo, Iván Alonso [0000-0003-0959-3466]spa
dc.contributor.orcidSilva Cortés, Alejandro [0000-0002-2910-1417]
dc.contributor.researchgroupModelamiento y Análisis Energía Ambiente Economíaspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T14:56:21Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T14:56:21Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramas, etc.spa
dc.description.abstractEl teletrabajo trae consigo múltiples beneficios para los empleados y para la sostenibilidad de las empresas, su evaluación e implementación tomó gran relevancia durante la pandemia de COVID-19, al impulsar el teletrabajo obligatorio, marcando el comienzo de una nueva era en el funcionamiento de las empresas, y dejando preguntas sobre su evaluación y adopción, ya que un significativo número de empresas sigue siendo reacio a adoptar este modo de funcionamiento operativo y laboral dentro de las mismas; mientras que otras continúan bajo este modelo después de su evaluación, al encontrar numerosas ventajas. La presente tesis doctoral evaluó la adopción del teletrabajo y sus efectos sobre la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones en Medellín, Colombia. Para llevar acabo esto, en primer lugar, se encuestaron a 72 directivos con poder de decisión sobre la adopción del teletrabajo en sus áreas u organizaciones a cargo, y mediante el modelamiento de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM), se examinó el cambio en el tiempo de los factores que influyen en la decisión de adoptar el teletrabajo y sus consiguientes impactos en sus intenciones; luego, se adaptó el modelo de dinámica de sistemas de difusión de Bass para simular la adopción organizacional e individual del teletrabajo y los impactos resultantes sobre la sostenibilidad ambiental de las mismas, tomando como indicadores el consumo energético y las emisiones de CO2 equivalentes del sector transporte. Los resultados del modelamiento SEM indican que la importancia del teletrabajo para las operaciones y su facilidad de uso determinan significativamente las actitudes de los directivos hacia su adopción. A partir de la información recopilada de 2012 a 2022 para validar el modelo de dinámica de sistemas difusión de Bass que integró estos factores descritos anteriormente, y simuló escenarios para evaluar la adopción a 2032, y se espera que para este año 1.6 millones de colombianos adopten esta modalidad de trabajo. Además, desde el punto de vista de la sostenibilidad, se prevé que la adopción del teletrabajo potencialmente contribuiría en una reducción del 1,55% de la demanda energética asociada al sector transporte de Colombia y a una disminución del 2% de las emisiones de CO2 equivalentes para el sector transporte de Colombia. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto la necesidad de que las empresas adopten el teletrabajo como estrategia para mejorar y contribuir a las metas sostenibilidad en articulación con las políticas públicas. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractTelework brings multiple benefits for employees and for the sustainability of companies, its evaluation and implementation took great relevance during the COVID-19 pandemic, by pushing for mandatory telework, and marking the beginning of a new era in the functioning of companies, but leaving questions about its evaluation and adoption, as a significant number of companies are still reluctant to adopt this mode of operational and work functioning within the same; while others continue under this model after its evaluation, finding numerous advantages. This doctoral thesis evaluated the adoption of telework and its effects on the sustainability of organisations in Medellín, Colombia. To do this, firstly, 72 managers with decision-making power were surveyed about the adoption of telework in their areas or organisations, and through structural equation modelling (SEM), the change over time of the factors influencing the decision to adopt telework and its consequent impacts on their intentions were examined. Subsequently, Bass' system dynamics diffusion model was adapted to simulate organisational and individual adoption of telework and the resulting impacts on their environmental sustainability using energy consumption and CO2 equivalent emissions in the transport sector as indicators. The results of the SEM modelling indicate that the importance of telework to operations and its ease of use significantly determine managers' attitudes towards its adoption. Based on information collected from 2012 to 2022 to validate Bass' system dynamics diffusion model that integrated these factors described above, and simulated scenarios to assess adoption to 2032, 1.6 million of Colombians are expected to adopt this mode of working by 2032. Furthermore, from a sustainability point of view, the adoption of telework is expected to potentially contribute to a 1.55% reduction in energy demand associated with the Colombian transport sector and a 2% reduction in CO2 equivalent emissions for the Colombian transport sector. The results highlight the need for companies to adopt telework as a strategy to improve and contribute to sustainability goals in articulation with public policies.eng
dc.description.curricularareaÁrea Curricular de Ingeniería Administrativa e Ingeniería Industrialspa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ingenieríaspa
dc.description.researchareaAnálisis de las Relaciones Energía-Ambiente-Economíaspa
dc.format.extentxvi, 155 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84856
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minasspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizacionesspa
dc.relation.indexedRedColspa
dc.relation.indexedLaReferenciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAdisa, T. A., Aiyenitaju, O., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). The work–family balance of British working women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-07-2020-0036spa
dc.relation.referencesAguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021). Talent management challenges during COVID-19 and beyond: Performance management to the rescue. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/23409444211009528, 24(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211009528spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmadi Achachlouei, M., & Hilty, L. M. (2016). Using Systems Thinking and System Dynamics Modeling to Understand Rebound Effects. 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23455-7_13spa
dc.relation.referencesAinsworth, J. D., Carruthers, E., Couch, P., Green, N., O’Flaherty, M., Sperrin, M., Williams, R., Asghar, Z., Capewell, S., & Buchan, I. E. (2011). IMPACT: A generic tool for modelling and simulating public health policy. Methods of Information in Medicine, 50(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME11-02-0006/ID/JR0006-24spa
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-Tspa
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.2002.TB00236.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888spa
dc.relation.referencesAjzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4spa
dc.relation.referencesAllen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1529100615593273, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Yusof, F. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2021). The Influence of Information System Success and Technology Acceptance Model on Social Media Factors in Education. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 7770, 13(14), 7770. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13147770spa
dc.relation.referencesAmini, M., & Bienstock, C. C. (2014). Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.02.016spa
dc.relation.referencesAmini, M., & Jahanbakhsh Javid, N. (2023). A Multi-Perspective Framework Established on Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) Theory and Technology, Organization and Environment (TOE) Framework Toward Supply Chain Management System Based on Cloud Computing Technology for Small and Medium Enterprises. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4340207spa
dc.relation.referencesAndersen, D. L., Luna-Reyes, L. F., Diker, V. G., Black, L., Rich, E., & Andersen, D. F. (2012). The disconfirmatory interview as a strategy for the assessment of system dynamics models. System Dynamics Review, 28(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/SDR.1479spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. C., Anderson, J. C., Kellogg, J. L., Gerbing, D. W., Brett, J., Fornell, C., Larcker, D., Jr, W. P., & Steiger, J. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 411--423. http://130.203.136.60/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1087.7520spa
dc.relation.referencesAnsong, E., & Boateng, R. (2018). Organisational adoption of telecommuting: Evidence from a developing country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(1), e12008. https://doi.org/10.1002/ISD2.12008spa
dc.relation.referencesArbelaez-Velasquez, C. A., Giraldo, D., & Quintero, S. (2022). Analysis of a Teleworking Technology Adoption Case: An Agent-Based Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16), 9930. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14169930/S1spa
dc.relation.referencesAristovnik, A., Murko, E., & Ravšelj, D. (2022). From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government. Administrative Sciences 2022, Vol. 12, Page 26, 12(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ADMSCI12010026spa
dc.relation.referencesAthanasiadou, C., & Theriou, G. (2021). Telework: systematic literature review and future research agenda. Heliyon, 7(10), e08165. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E08165spa
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R. (2006). Chapter 33 Agent-based Modeling as a Bridge Between Disciplines. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2, 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02033-2spa
dc.relation.referencesAzar, A. T. (2012). System dynamics as a useful technique for complex systems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 10(4), 377–410. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2012.046298spa
dc.relation.referencesBagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (2009). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/10705519409539961, 1(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519409539961spa
dc.relation.referencesBailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.144spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, S., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. (2020). Macroeconomic Policy in the Time of COVID-19: A Primer for Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.3386/W21633spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, S., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. (2020). Macroeconomic Policy in the Time of COVID-19: A Primer for Developing Countries. https://doi.org/10.3386/W21633spa
dc.relation.referencesBarlas, Y. (1989). Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research, 42(1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(89)90059-3spa
dc.relation.referencesBass, F. M. (2004). “A New Product Growth f or Model Consumer Durables” The Bass Model. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 50(12), 1833–1840. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0300spa
dc.relation.referencesBass, F. M., Krishnan, T. V., & Jain, D. C. (1994). Why the Bass Model Fits without Decision Variables. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Mksc.13.3.203, 13(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/MKSC.13.3.203spa
dc.relation.referencesBeauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A., & Canonico, E. (2019). Telework: Outcomes and facilitators for employees. The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior, 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649636.020spa
dc.relation.referencesBeham, B., Baierl, A., & Poelmans, S. (2014). Managerial telework allowance decisions – a vignette study among German managers. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/09585192.2014.934894, 26(11), 1385–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.934894spa
dc.relation.referencesBelostecinic, G., Mogoș, R. I., Popescu, M. L., Burlacu, S., Rădulescu, C. V., Bodislav, D. A., Bran, F., & Oancea-Negescu, M. D. (2021). Teleworking—An Economic and Social Impact during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Data Mining Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, Vol. 19, Page 298, 19(1), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19010298spa
dc.relation.referencesBelzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 3662, 12(9), 3662. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12093662spa
dc.relation.referencesBhattacherjee, A., Davis, C. J., Connolly, A. J., & Hikmet, N. (2017). User response to mandatory IT use: a coping theory perspective. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/S41303-017-0047-0, 27(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41303-017-0047-0spa
dc.relation.referencesBhui, K. S., Dinos, S., Stansfeld, S. A., & White, P. D. (2012). A Synthesis of the Evidence for Managing Stress at Work: A Review of the Reviews Reporting on Anxiety, Depression, and Absenteeism. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/515874spa
dc.relation.referencesBonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl_3), 7280–7287. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.082080899spa
dc.relation.referencesBontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142/FULL/XMLspa
dc.relation.referencesBorsatto, J. M. L. S., & Bazani, C. L. (2021). Green innovation and environmental regulations: a systematic review of international academic works. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 63751–63768. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-11379-7/TABLES/3spa
dc.relation.referencesBourhis, A., & Mekkaoui, R. (2010). Beyond Work-Family Balance: Are Family-Friendly Organizations More Attractive? Relations Industrielles, 65(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.7202/039529ARspa
dc.relation.referencesCaraiani, C., Lungu, C. I., Dascalu, C., & Stoian, C. A. (2022). The impact of telework on organisational performance, behaviour, and culture: evidence from business services industry based on employees’ perceptions. Http://Www.Tandfonline.Com/Action/AuthorSubmission?JournalCode=rero20&page=instructions. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2142815spa
dc.relation.referencesCarillo, K., Cachat-Rosset, G., Marsan, J., Saba, T., & Klarsfeld, A. (2020). Adjusting to epidemic-induced telework: empirical insights from teleworkers in France. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1829512, 30(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1829512spa
dc.relation.referencesCarr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A Theory of Planned Behavior approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2006.12.016spa
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, M., Hagerman, A. D., & Whitacre, B. (2022). Telework and COVID-19 Resiliency in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 52(1), 19–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesCavana, R. Y. (2003). Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics models of environmental systems. Andrew Ford Island Press, Washington DC, 1999, viii + 401 pp. ISBN: 1-55963-601-7. System Dynamics Review, 19(2), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/SDR.272spa
dc.relation.referencesCharalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2018). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886spa
dc.relation.referencesChênevert, D., Fournier, P.-L., Menvielle, L., Bruneau, J., Jutras-Aswad, D., & Bissonnette, A. (2022). Lockdowns and Telework: Psychological and Work-Related Consequences. Relations Industrielles, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.7202/1088552ARspa
dc.relation.referencesChoo, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2005). Does telecommuting reduce vehicle-miles traveled? An aggregate time series analysis for the U.S. Transportation, 32(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11116-004-3046-7/METRICSspa
dc.relation.referencesClauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12186spa
dc.relation.referencesCompeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Isre.6.2.118, 6(2), 118–143. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.6.2.118spa
dc.relation.referencesConfecámaras. (2013). Impacto de la Formalización Empresarial en Colombia. Impacto de La Formalización Empresarial En Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesCongreso de la República de Colombia. (2008, June 16). LEY 1221 DE 2008-Por la cual se establecen normas para promover y regular el Teletrabajo y se dictan otras disposiciones.spa
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers1. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8551.2006.00498.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F., Szabat, K. A., & Evan, W. M. (1989). The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6486.1989.TB00746.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2022). Encuesta Pulso Social. Https://Www.Dane.Gov.Co/Index.Php/Estadisticas-Por-Tema/Encuesta-Pulso-Social. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/encuesta-pulso-socialspa
dc.relation.referencesDaniels, K., Lamond, D., & Standen, P. (2001). Teleworking: Frameworks for Organizational Research. Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1151–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00276spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. D. (2014). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/35465050spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1287/Mnsc.35.8.982, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.35.8.982spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Marco, M., Marcone, F., & Scarozza, D. (2022). Smart Working in Public Administration: Anti Pandemic Tool or Work Organization Model? Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 53, 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94252-6_21/COVERspa
dc.relation.referencesdel Río González, P. (2009). The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2008.07.004spa
dc.relation.referencesDeterminants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model on JSTOR. (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011042spa
dc.relation.referencesDhirasasna, N. N., & Sahin, O. (2021). A system dynamics model for renewable energy technology adoption of the hotel sector. Renewable Energy, 163, 1994–2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2020.10.088spa
dc.relation.referencesDias, P., Lopes, S., & Peixoto, R. (2022). Mastering new technologies: does it relate to teleworkers’ (in)voluntariness and well-being? Journal of Knowledge Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0003/FULL/XMLspa
dc.relation.referencesDimitrova, D. (2003). Controlling teleworkers: supervision and flexibility revisited. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00120spa
dc.relation.referencesDonthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.06.008spa
dc.relation.referencesEckert, E., & Kovalevska, O. (2021). Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the Discourse of the European Green Deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2021, Vol. 14, Page 80, 14(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/JRFM14020080spa
dc.relation.referencesEgbuta, I. C., Thomas, B., & Al-Hasan, S. (2001). Teleworking and a Green Computing Environment: A Conceptual Model. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/IJICTHD.2017010104, 9(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTHD.2017010104spa
dc.relation.referencesFan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (2009). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10705519909540119, 6(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540119spa
dc.relation.referencesFishman, G. S., & Kiviat, P. J. (1967). The Analysis of Simulation-Generated Time Series. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Mnsc.13.7.525, 13(7), 525–557. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.13.7.525spa
dc.relation.referencesFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980spa
dc.relation.referencesForrester, J. W. (1993). System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years. A Systems-Based Approach to Policymaking, 199–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3226-2_7spa
dc.relation.referencesForrester, J. W. (2017). Industrial Dynamics. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/Palgrave.Jors.2600946, 48(10), 1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.1057/PALGRAVE.JORS.2600946spa
dc.relation.referencesGajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown About Telecommuting: Meta-Analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524spa
dc.relation.referencesGallivan, M. J. (2001). Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 51–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506729spa
dc.relation.referencesGálvez, A., Tirado, F., & Martínez, M. J. (2020). Work–Life Balance, Organizations and Social Sustainability: Analyzing Female Telework in Spain. Sustainability, 12(9), 1–21. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3567-d351215.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesGhaleb, E. A. A., Dominic, P. D. D., Fati, S. M., Muneer, A., & Ali, R. F. (2021). The Assessment of Big Data Adoption Readiness with a Technology–Organization–Environment Framework: A Perspective towards Healthcare Employees. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 8379, 13(15), 8379. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13158379spa
dc.relation.referencesGolden, T. D. (2012). Applying technology to work: toward a better understanding of telework. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1057/Omj.2009.33, 6(4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/OMJ.2009.33spa
dc.relation.referencesGolden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The Impact of Professional Isolation on Teleworker Job Performance and Turnover Intentions: Does Time Spent Teleworking, Interacting Face-to-Face, or Having Access to Communication-Enhancing Technology Matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0012722spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez V., J. J., & Jochem, P. (2019). Simulating vehicle fleet composition: A review of system dynamics models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 115, 109367. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2019.109367spa
dc.relation.referencesGoodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D., & March, S. T. (2000). User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Information & Management, 38(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00057-4spa
dc.relation.referencesGoodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 19(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689spa
dc.relation.referencesGreenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0887-378X.2004.00325.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesGruenhagen, J. H., & Parker, R. (2020). Factors driving or impeding the diffusion and adoption of innovation in mining: A systematic review of the literature. Resources Policy, 65, 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2019.101540spa
dc.relation.referencesHaddon, L., & Brynin, M. (2005). The character of telework and the characteristics of teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-005X.2005.00142.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesHage, J. (2018). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. 345–372. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449482-17spa
dc.relation.referencesHaider, M., & Anwar, A. I. (2023). The prevalence of telework under Covid-19 in Canada. Information Technology and People, 36(1), 196–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2021-0585/FULL/XMLspa
dc.relation.referencesHale, J. L., Householder, B. J., & Greene, K. L. (2002). The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice - James Price Dillard, Michael Pfau - Google Books (Vol. 14).spa
dc.relation.referencesHassan, A. M., & Lee, H. (2015). Toward the sustainable development of urban areas: An overview of global trends in trials and policies. Land Use Policy, 48, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2015.04.029spa
dc.relation.referencesHeijkoop, G., & Cunningham, S. (2007). Using System Dynamics for Modeling Benefit Realization in the Adoption of New Business Software.spa
dc.relation.referencesHenry, M. S., le Roux, D. B., & Parry, D. A. (2021). Working in a post Covid-19 world: Towards a conceptual framework for distributed work. South African Journal of Business Management, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJBM.V52I1.2155spa
dc.relation.referencesHook, A., Court, V., Sovacool, B. K., & Sorrell, S. (2020). A systematic review of the energy and climate impacts of teleworking. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 093003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/AB8A84spa
dc.relation.referencesHooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Evaluating Model Fit:a Synthesis of the Structural Equation Modelling Literature. Conference Papers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73spa
dc.relation.referencesHorvat, A., Fogliano, V., & Luning, P. A. (2020). Modifying the Bass diffusion model to study adoption of radical new foods–The case of edible insects in the Netherlands. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0234538. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0234538spa
dc.relation.referencesIllegems, V., & Verbeke, A. (2004). Telework: What Does it Mean for Management? Long Range Planning, 37(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LRP.2004.03.004spa
dc.relation.referencesIveroth, E., & Bengtsson, F. (2014). Changing behavior towards sustainable practices using Information Technology. Journal of Environmental Management, 139, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2013.11.054spa
dc.relation.referencesKaluza, A. J., & van Dick, R. (2022). Telework at times of a pandemic: The role of voluntariness in the perception of disadvantages of telework. Current Psychology, 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-022-03047-5/FIGURES/3spa
dc.relation.referencesKazekami, S. (2020). Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2019.101868spa
dc.relation.referencesKitou, E., & Horvath, A. (2003). Energy-related emissions from telework. Environmental Science and Technology, 37(16), 3467–3475. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES025849P/SUPPL_FILE/ES025849PSI20020606_015814.PDFspa
dc.relation.referencesKwon, T. H., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, 227–251. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=54905.54915spa
dc.relation.referencesLai, C. P. (2019). Personality Traits and Stock Investment of Individuals. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 5474, 11(19), 5474. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11195474spa
dc.relation.referencesLanzolla, G., Pesce, D., & Tucci, C. L. (2021). The Digital Transformation of Search and Recombination in the Innovation Function: Tensions and an Integrative Framework*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/JPIM.12546spa
dc.relation.referencesLaumer, S., & Maier, C. (2021). Why do People (not) Want to Work from Home? An Individual-focused Literature Review on Telework. SIGMIS-CPR 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 Computers and People Research Conference, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458026.3462155spa
dc.relation.referencesLebopo, C. M., Seymour, L. F., & Knoesen, H. (2020). Explaining factors affecting telework adoption in South African organisations pre-COVID-19. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410886.3410906spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 61(1), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.10.001spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, J., Lee, H., & Suh, A. (2009). Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Information Technology and Crafting of Job: Shaping Future of Work? Retrieved February 19, 2023, from https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/275spa
dc.relation.referencesLeonard, D. A. (2011). Managing knowledge assets, creativity and innovation. Managing Knowledge Assets, Creativity and Innovation, 1–571. https://doi.org/10.1142/7638spa
dc.relation.referencesLimayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 31(4), 705–737. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616spa
dc.relation.referencesMahler, J. (2012). The Telework Divide. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0734371X12458127, 32(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X12458127spa
dc.relation.referencesMalhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772658spa
dc.relation.referencesMalik, S., Chadhar, M., Vatanasakdakul, S., & Chetty, M. (2021). Factors Affecting the Organizational Adoption of Blockchain Technology: Extending the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) Framework in the Australian Context. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 9404, 13(16), 9404. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13169404spa
dc.relation.referencesMallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2018). Assessing Indirect Environmental Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 2662, 10(8), 2662. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10082662spa
dc.relation.referencesManstead, A. S. R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000012spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, J., J. E., Arango, A., S., Álvarez, U., K. C., & Jaramillo, A., P. (2017). Assessing the impacts of transport policies through energy system simulation: The case of the Medellin Metropolitan Area, Colombia. Energy Policy, 101, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2016.11.026spa
dc.relation.referencesMartinez, M., I. J., & Richardson, G. P. (2013). Best practices in system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 29(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/SDR.1495spa
dc.relation.referencesMartins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2013.06.002spa
dc.relation.referencesMayo, M., Pastor, J. C., Gomez, Mejia, L., & Cruz, C. (2009). Why some firms adopt telecommuting while others do not: A contingency perspective. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/HRM.20322spa
dc.relation.referencesMcMaster, M., Nettleton, C., Tom, C., Xu, B., Cao, C., & Qiao, P. (2020). Risk Management: Rethinking Fashion Supply Chain Management for Multinational Corporations in Light of the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2020, Vol. 13, Page 173, 13(8), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/JRFM13080173spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación. (2018). Estudio de penetración del Teletrabajo en empresas-Colombia. Https://Www.Teletrabajo.Gov.Co/622/W3-Article-75985.Html. https://www.teletrabajo.gov.co/622/w3-article-75985.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (MinTIC). (2020). Penetración de Teletrabajo en Colombia –Quinta medición. Mintic. https://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/715/articles-179742_recurso_1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio del Trabajo. (2012). Línea de Base del Teletrabajo en Colombia . Https://Www.Teletrabajo.Gov.Co/622/Articles-8145_archivo_pdf_diagnostico_2012.Pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinTIC. (2020). QUINTO ESTUDIO DE PERCEPCIÓN Y PENETRACIÓN EN EMPRESAS COLOMBIANAS 2020. QUINTO ESTUDIO DE PERCEPCIÓN Y PENETRACIÓN EN EMPRESAS COLOMBIANAS 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinTIC. (2021, December 30). Penetración y percepción del teletrabajo. MinTIC. https://www.teletrabajo.gov.co/622/articles-209505_recurso_1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMoglia, M., Hopkins, J., & Bardoel, A. (2021). Telework, Hybrid Work and the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Policy Coherence. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 9222, 13(16), 9222. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13169222spa
dc.relation.referencesMohammadi, M., Rahimi, E., Davatgari, A., Javadinasr, M., Mohammadian, A., Bhagat-Conway, M. W., Salon, D., Derrible, S., Pendyala, R. M., & Khoeini, S. (2022). Examining the persistence of telecommuting after the COVID-19 pandemic. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2077582. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2077582spa
dc.relation.referencesMokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (1994). Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting: Setting the Context. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1068/A260749, 26(5), 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1068/A260749spa
dc.relation.referencesMontoya, R., L. A., & Montoya, R., I. (2022). La restauración organizacional, estrategia emergente como metáfora para la adaptación de los ecosistemas empresariales. Criterio Libre, 20(36), e459084–e459084. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/CRITERIOLIBRE.2022V20N36.9084spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Isre.2.3.192, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.2.3.192spa
dc.relation.referencesMoore, G. C., Benbasat, I., Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.2.3.192spa
dc.relation.referencesMorlán, S. C., I., Davalillo, A., A., & Dolado, C., J. J. (2010). Modelo de dinámica de sistemas para la implantación de tecnologías de la información en la gestión estratégica universitaria. http://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/12277spa
dc.relation.referencesMüller, T., & Niessen, C. (2019). Self-leadership in the context of part-time teleworking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.2371spa
dc.relation.referencesMustonen, O., E. (2014). Methodologies Choice and Adoption: Using Diffusion of Innovations as the Theoretical Framework. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228997645spa
dc.relation.referencesNeufeld, D. J., & Fang, Y. (2005). Individual, social and situational determinants of telecommuter productivity. Information & Management, 42(7), 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2004.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesNunnally, J. C. (1978). An Overview of Psychological Measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders, 97–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Brien, W., & Yazdani, A., F. (2020). Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods. Energy and Buildings, 225, 110298. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2020.110298spa
dc.relation.referencesOng, T. F., & Musa, G. (2011). An examination of recreational divers’ underwater behaviour by attitude–behaviour theories. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/13683500.2010.545370, 14(8), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2010.545370spa
dc.relation.referencesPalliya, N., Sasika, G., & Naotunna, I. (2018). Autonomy and Creativity of Professional Teleworkers: The Mediating Role of Creative Self Efficacy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324080932spa
dc.relation.referencesPan, M.-J., & Jang, W.-Y. (2016). Taiwan’s Communications Industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646025spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, S., & Cho, Y. J. (2020). Does telework status affect the behavior and perception of supervisors? Examining task behavior and perception in the telework context. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1777183, 33(7), 1326–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1777183spa
dc.relation.referencesParker, L. D. (2020). The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(8), 1943–1967. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609/FULL/XMLspa
dc.relation.referencesParra, J. F., Jaramillo, P., & Arango, A., S. (2018). Metaheuristic optimization methods for calibration of system dynamics models. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1467850, 12(2), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1467850spa
dc.relation.referencesPerez, P., M., Martinez, S., A., & De Luis Carnicer, M. P. (2010). Top Manager and Institutional Effects on the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of Teleworking 1. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/0810902032000051018, 21(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902032000051018spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, P., M., Martínez, S., A., de Luis Carnicer, P., & José Vela Jiménez, M. (2004). A technology acceptance model of innovation adoption: The case of teleworking. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565038/FULL/XMLspa
dc.relation.referencesPicoto, W. N., Bélanger, F., & Palma-Dos-Reis, A. (2014). A technology-organisation-environment (TOE)-based m-business value instrument. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 12(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2014.059240spa
dc.relation.referencesPintelas, E., Livieris, I. E., & Pintelas, P. (2020). A Grey-Box Ensemble Model Exploiting Black-Box Accuracy and White-Box Intrinsic Interpretability. Algorithms 2020, Vol. 13, Page 17, 13(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/A13010017spa
dc.relation.referencesPorter, L., Rickards, L., Verlie, B., Moloney, S., Lay, B., Latham, B., Anguelovski, I., Pellow, D., Porter, L., Bosomworth, K., Rickards, L., Verlie, B., Moloney, S., Lay, B., Latham, B., BCNUEJ, I. A., Pellow, D. N., Naarm/Birrarung-ga, Porter, L., … Lay, B. (2020). Climate Justice in a Climate Changed World. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1748959, 21(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1748959spa
dc.relation.referencesQudrat, U., H., & Seong, B. S. (2010). How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2216–2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.12.009spa
dc.relation.referencesRachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2019). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1143–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020/FULL/PDFspa
dc.relation.referencesRaghuram, S., & Fang, D. (2014). Telecommuting and the role of supervisory power in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10490-013-9360-X/FIGURES/1spa
dc.relation.referencesRaghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Annals.2017.0020, 13(1), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/ANNALS.2017.0020spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1496176spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1496176spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. The Free Press, 866 Third Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10022.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoth, K. W., Rhodes, T., & Ponoum, R. (2008). The energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of telecommuting in the U.S. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2008.4562945spa
dc.relation.referencesRoth, K. W., Rhodes, T., & Ponoum, R. (2008). The energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of telecommuting in the U.S. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2008.4562945spa
dc.relation.referencesRuppel, C., & Howard, G. S. (1998). The Effects of Environmental Factors on the Adoption and Diffusion of Telework. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/Joeuc.1998100101, 10(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.1998100101spa
dc.relation.referencesRuppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (1995). Telework. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2–3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/217278.217288spa
dc.relation.referencesRuppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (1995). Telework: an innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon? ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 26(2–3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/217278.217288spa
dc.relation.referencesRuth, S., & Chaudhry, I. (2008). Telework: A productivity paradox? IEEE Internet Computing, 12(6), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2008.132spa
dc.relation.referencesSalgado y Burruezo, A. (2022). Teletreball, gènere i corresponsabilitat: anàlisi i projecte en l’àmbit de l’administració de la Generalitat de Catalunya. http://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/53967spa
dc.relation.referencesScott, J. (2022). Phishing ecosystem : A Qualitative Analysis of Phishing Susceptibility in Employees Who Work from Home. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-22262spa
dc.relation.referencesShamsi, M., Iakovleva, T., Olsen, E., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2021). Employees’ Work-Related Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model and JD-R Theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, Vol. 18, Page 11888, 18(22), 11888. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH182211888spa
dc.relation.referencesShayan, N. F., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 1222, 14(3), 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14031222spa
dc.relation.referencesShin, B. (2003). Telework Effectiveness: Task, Technology and Communication Fit Perspective. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/978-1-93177-745-2.Ch001, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-93177-745-2.CH001spa
dc.relation.referencesShin, B., Liu Sheng, O. R., & Higa, K. (2009). Telework: Existing Research and Future Directions. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1002_2, 10(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1002_2spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva C, A., Montoya R, I. A., & Valencia A, J. A. (2019). The attitude of managers toward telework, why is it so difficult to adopt it in organizations? Technology in Society, 59, 101133. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2019.04.009spa
dc.relation.referencesSivakumar, V., Higa, K., Yen, J., & Bui, T. X. (1996). Telework : a diffusion of administrative innovations. Proceedings of the First Asia-Pacific Decision Sciences Institute Conference, Hong Kong,, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.2/VALIDATOR.MIN.JSspa
dc.relation.referencesSpencer, A. J., Buhalis, D., & Moital, M. (2012). A hierarchical model of technology adoption for small owner-managed travel firms: An organizational decision-making and leadership perspective. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOURMAN.2011.11.011spa
dc.relation.referencesStacks, D. W., & Salwen, M. Brian. (2014). Diffusion of Innovations. 432–448. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887011-36spa
dc.relation.referencesSterman, J. D. (2002). System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/102741spa
dc.relation.referencesSwinerd, C., & McNaught, K. R. (2017). Simulating the diffusion of technological innovation with an integrated hybrid agent-based system dynamics model. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/Jos.2014.2, 8(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1057/JOS.2014.2spa
dc.relation.referencesTabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics Title: Using multivariate statistics. https://lccn.loc.gov/2017040173spa
dc.relation.referencesTaber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-016-9602-2/TABLES/1spa
dc.relation.referencesTanimoto, K. (2013). Sustainability and Sustainable Development. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2370–2378. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_662spa
dc.relation.referencesTarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/ISJ.12042spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00895-5spa
dc.relation.referencesTerazumi, W., Murata, H., & Kobayashi, H. (2022). System dynamics model for changing transportation demand during the pandemic in Japan. Procedia CIRP, 105, 805–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2022.02.133spa
dc.relation.referencesTornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, Mitchell., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). processes of technological innovation. The Processes of Technological Innovation, 298. https://doi.org/10.3/JQUERY-UI.JSspa
dc.relation.referencesTremblay, D. G. (2002). Balancing work and family with telework? Organizational issues and challenges for women and managers. Women in Management Review, 17(3/4), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420210425309/FULL/XMLspa
dc.relation.referencesTurk, T., & Trkman, P. (2012). Bass model estimates for broadband diffusion in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2011.06.010spa
dc.relation.referencesUllman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.HOP202023spa
dc.relation.referencesUPME. (2019). PLAN ENERGÉTICO NACIONAL 2020- 2050.spa
dc.relation.referencesUrbaniec, M., Małkowska, A., & Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H. (2022). The Impact of Technological Developments on Remote Working: Insights from the Polish Managers’ Perspective. Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 552, 14(1), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14010552spa
dc.relation.referencesUtterback, J. M., & Afuah, A. N. (2006). The Dynamic ‘Diamond’: A Technological Innovation Perspective. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/10438599800000019, 6(2–3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000019spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Steenbergen, E. F., Van Der Ven, C., Peeters, M. C. W., Taris, T. W., & Steenbergen, E. F. Van. (2022). Telework and Worker Health and Well-Being: A Review and Recommendations for Research and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, Vol. 19, Page 3879, 19(7), 3879. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19073879spa
dc.relation.referencesVendramin, N., Nardelli, G., & Ipsen, C. (2021). Task-Technology Fit Theory: An Approach For Mitigating Technostress. A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment Between People and the Office Environment, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-4/TASK-TECHNOLOGY-FIT-THEORY-NELDA-VENDRAMIN-GIULIA-NARDELLI-CHRISTINE-IPSENspa
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5915.2008.00192.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–205. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&issn=00251909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA62347235&sid=googleScholar&linkaccess=fulltextspa
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540spa
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., & Speier, C. (2000). Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(6), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1006/IJHC.1999.0367spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, W.-T., & Liu, C.-Y. (2005). The Application of the Technology Acceptance Model: A New Way to Evaluate Information System Success.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, M., & Greenhill, A. (2004). Gender and teleworking identities in the risk society: a research agenda. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-005X.2004.00138.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesWood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1989.4279067, 14(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067spa
dc.relation.referencesYen, J., Sivakumar, V., Higa, K., Bui, T. X., Yen, J. ;, Sivakumar, V. ;, Higa, K. ;, & Higaand, K. (1996). Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) A Model for Diffusion of Telework Recommended Citation A Model for Diffusion of Telework. AMCIS. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis1996/32spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingenieríaspa
dc.subject.ddc650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia generalspa
dc.subject.lembTrabajo en casaspa
dc.subject.lembHome laboreng
dc.subject.lembTelecommutingeng
dc.subject.lembTeleconmutaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalAdopción organizacional del teletrabajospa
dc.subject.proposalImpactos en la sostenibilidad ambientalspa
dc.subject.proposalDinámica de sistemasspa
dc.subject.proposalModelamiento de ecuaciones estructuralesspa
dc.subject.proposalOrganisational adoption of teleworkeng
dc.subject.proposalImpacts on environmental sustainabilityeng
dc.subject.proposalSystem dynamicseng
dc.subject.proposalStructural equation modellingeng
dc.titleEvaluación de la adopción del teletrabajo y sus implicaciones en la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones de Medellínspa
dc.title.translatedEvaluation of telework adoption and its implications in the sustainability of organizations in Medellineng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestrosspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1026139667.2023.pdf
Tamaño:
2.53 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones