Percepciones sobre el riesgo del uso de teléfonos inteligentes durante la práctica anestésica en salas de cirugía, en especialistas y estudiantes de posgrado en Anestesiología del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia

dc.contributor.advisorDavid Alberto, Rincón Valenzuela
dc.contributor.authorGerardo Alfonso, Galeano Triviño
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T15:38:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-13T15:38:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficasspa
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: Recientemente, hemos sido testigos de un crecimiento y avance de las tecnologías móviles y el internet, debiéndose destacar la rápida evolución de los teléfonos inteligentes o smartphones. En el ámbito de la anestesiología estos dispositivos permiten la comunicación entre los distintos miembros del equipo, la adquisición de conocimientos, la implementación de la telemedicina y/o monitoreo remoto, entre otros. No obstante, se ha sugerido que estos dispositivos pueden representar una amenaza para la seguridad del paciente, ya que son una fuente de distracción durante las tareas cognitivas, pudiendo provocar eventos adversos. Globalmente, algunos estudios se han centrado principalmente en los beneficios del uso de teléfonos inteligentes en la educación y capacitación de los profesionales de la salud, sin embargo, existe un vacío en la investigación acerca de las percepciones sobre el riesgo que representa el uso de teléfonos inteligentes durante la práctica clínica. Objetivos: Describir las percepciones sobre el riesgo que conlleva el uso de teléfonos inteligentes durante la práctica anestésica en salas de cirugía, en especialistas y estudiantes de posgrado en Anestesiología del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia Metodología: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, en el cual se evaluaron las percepciones sobre el riesgo del uso de teléfonos inteligentes durante la práctica anestésica en salas de cirugía, en especialistas y estudiantes de posgrado en Anestesiología del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia; a partir de la aplicación de un cuestionario virtual autoaplicado (encuesta), diseñado para tal fin. Resultados: La totalidad de los participantes informaron usar teléfonos inteligentes durante la atención del paciente anestesiado. La mayoría de los participantes, reconocen las ventajas y beneficios que ofrecen estos dispositivos. Conclusiones: El uso de teléfonos inteligentes es una práctica regular en el ámbito de la anestesia. El uso de teléfonos inteligentes, no se percibió por la población como una distracción en su práctica rutinaria. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Recently, we have witnessed a growth and advancement of mobile technologies and the internet, highlighting the rapid evolution of smart phones or smartphones. In the field of anesthesiology, these devices allow communication between the different team members, the acquisition of knowledge, the implementation of telemedicine and/or remote monitoring, among others. However, it has been suggested that these devices may represent a threat to patient safety, since they are a source of distraction during cognitive tasks, and may cause adverse events. Globally, some studies have focused primarily on the benefits of smartphone use in the education and training of health professionals, however, there is a research gap regarding perceptions of the risk posed by smartphone use. intelligent during clinical practice. Objectives: To describe the perceptions of the risk associated with the use of smartphones during anesthetic practice in operating rooms, among specialists and postgraduate students in Anesthesiology at the National University Hospital of Colombia. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out, in which the perceptions about the risk of the use of smartphones during anesthetic practice in operating rooms, in specialists and postgraduate students in Anesthesiology of the National University Hospital of Colombia were evaluated; from the application of a self-applied virtual questionnaire (survey), designed for this purpose. Results: All the participants reported using smartphones during the care of the anesthetized patient. Most of the participants recognize the advantages and benefits offered by these devices. Conclusions: The use of smartphones is a regular practice in the field of anesthesia. The use of smartphones was not perceived by the population as a distraction in their routine practice.eng
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicasspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Anestesiología y Reanimaciónspa
dc.description.methodsEstudio descriptivo de corte transversalspa
dc.description.researchareaSeguridad del pacientespa
dc.format.extent71 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82916
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Anestesiología y Reanimaciónspa
dc.relation.references1.Zarandona J, Cariñanos-Ayala S, Cristóbal-Domínguez E, Martín-Bezos J, Yoldi-Mitxelena A, Hoyos Cillero I. With a smartphone in one 's pocket: A descriptive cross-sectional study on smartphone use, distraction and restriction policies in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2019; 82:67–73.spa
dc.relation.references2.Thomairy NA, Mummaneni M, Alsalamah S, Moussa N, Coustasse A. Use of smartphones in hospitals. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015;34(4):297–307.spa
dc.relation.references3.Atlas de acceso Fijo a Internet - Cuarto trimestre de 2020 [Internet]. Gov.co. [citado 22 de septiembre de 2021]. Disponible en: https://colombiatic.mintic.gov.co/679/w3-article-178186.htmlspa
dc.relation.references4.Sheraton TE, Wilkes AR, Hall JE. Mobile phones and the developing world: Editorial. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2012;67(9):945–50. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07298.spa
dc.relation.references5.Pınar HU, Karaca O, Doğan R, Konuk ÜM. Smartphone use habits of anesthesia providers during anesthetized patient care: a survey from Turkey. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):88.spa
dc.relation.references6.Cho S, Lee E. Distraction by smartphone use during clinical practice and opinions about smartphone restriction policies: A cross-sectional descriptive study of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 40:128–33.spa
dc.relation.references7.Campbell G, Arfanis K, Smith AF. Distraction and interruption in anesthetic practice. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):707–15.spa
dc.relation.references8.McBride DL. Distraction of clinicians by smartphones in hospitals: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(9):2020-2030.spa
dc.relation.references9.McNally G, Frey R, Crossan M. Nurse manager and student nurse perceptions of the use of personal smartphones or tablets and the adjunct applications, as an educational tool in clinical settings. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;23:1–7.spa
dc.relation.references10.Soto RG, Chu LF, Goldman JM, Rampil IJ, Ruskin KJ. Communication in critical care environments: mobile telephones improve patient care. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(2):535–41.spa
dc.relation.references11.Domino KB, Sessler DI. Internet use during anesthesia care: does it matter? Anesthesiology. 2012;117(6):1156–8.spa
dc.relation.references12.Raman J. Mobile technology in nursing education: where do we go from here? A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(5):663–72.spa
dc.relation.references13.Murthy VS, Malhotra SK, Bala I, Raghunathan M. Detrimental effects of noise on anesthetists. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42(7):608–11.spa
dc.relation.references14.Tsiou C, Efthimiatos G, Katostaras T. Noise in the operating rooms of Greek hospitals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123(2):757–65.spa
dc.relation.references15.Gui JL, Nemergut EC, Forkin KT. Distraction in the operating room: A narrative review of environmental and self-initiated distractions and their effect on anesthesia providers. J Clin Anesth. 2021;68(110110):110110.spa
dc.relation.references16.Padmakumar AD, Cohen O, Churton A, Groves JB, Mitchell DA, Brennan PA. Effect of noise on tasks in operating theaters: a survey of the perceptions of healthcare staff. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(2):164–7.spa
dc.relation.references17.Crockett CJ, Donahue BS, Vandivier DC. Distraction-Free Induction Zone: A quality improvement initiative at a large academic children’s hospital to improve the quality and safety of anesthetic care for our patients. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(3):794–803.spa
dc.relation.references18.Hawksworth CR, Sivalingam P, Asbury AJ. The effect of music on anesthetists’ psychomotor performance. Anaesthesia. 1998;53(2):195–7.spa
dc.relation.references19.Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Vincent CA. Distracting communications in the operating theater. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13(3):390–4.spa
dc.relation.references20.Hawksworth C, Asbury AJ, Millar K. Music in theater: not so harmonious: A survey of attitudes to music played in the operating theater. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(1):79–83.spa
dc.relation.references21.Savoldelli GL, Thieblemont J, Clergue F, Waeber J-L, Forster A, Garnerin P. Incidence and impact of distracting events during induction of general anaesthesia for urgent surgical cases. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(8):683– 9.spa
dc.relation.references22.Wheelock A, Suliman A, Wharton R, Babu ED, Hull L, Vincent C, et al. The impact of operating room distractions on stress, workload, and teamwork. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1079–84.spa
dc.relation.references23.Beauregard P, Arnaert A, Ponzoni N. Nursing students’ perceptions of using smartphones in the community practicum: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;53:1–6.spa
dc.relation.references24.Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P, Akeroyd MA, Hilditch G. Critical phase distractions in anesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept: Critical phase distractions in anesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(3):175–9.spa
dc.relation.references25.Jenkins A, Wilkinson JV, Akeroyd MA, Broom MA. Distractions during critical phases of anesthesia for cesarean section: an observational study. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(5):543–8.spa
dc.relation.references26.Avidan A, Yacobi G, Weissman C, Levin PD. Cell phone calls in the operating theater and staff distractions: An observational study: An observational study. J Patient Saf. 2019;15(4):e52–5.spa
dc.relation.references27.Jorm CM, O’Sullivan G. Laptops and smartphones in the operating theater - how does our knowledge of vigilance, multi-tasking and anesthetist performance help us in our approach to this new distraction? Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(1):71–8.spa
dc.relation.references28.Van Pelt M, Weinger MB. Distractions in the anesthesia work environment: Impact on patient safety? Report of a meeting sponsored by the anesthesia patient safety foundation. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(1):347–50.spa
dc.relation.references29.Schulte TE, Roberts EK, Birch K, Lisco SJ. Assessing electronic interruptions experienced by an anesthesiology clinical director. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:658–60.spa
dc.relation.references30.Cohen TN, Shappell SA, Reeves ST, Boquet AJ. Distracted doctoring: The role of personal electronic devices in the operating room. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2018;10:10–3.spa
dc.relation.references31.Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Gaba DM. The effect of electronic record keeping and transesophageal echocardiography on task distribution, workload, and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(1):144–55; discussion 29A-30A.spa
dc.relation.references32.Jones CPL, Fawkner-Corbett J, Groom P, Morton B, Lister C, Mercer SJ. Human factors in preventing complications in anesthesia: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2018;73 Suppl 1:12–24.spa
dc.relation.references33.Chou E, Lim J, Brant R, Ford S, Ansermino JM. Accuracy of detecting changes in auditory heart rate in a simulated operating room environment. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(11):1181–6.spa
dc.relation.references34.Wiegmann DA, ElBardissi AW, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Sundt TM 3rd. Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery. 2007;142(5):658–65.spa
dc.relation.references35.van Harten A, Gooszen HG, Koksma JJ, Niessen TJH, Abma TA. An observational study of distractions in the operating theatre. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(3):346–56.spa
dc.relation.references36.Grow JN, Vargo JD, Nazir N, Korentager R. Smartphone applications in plastic surgery: A cross-sectional survey of 577 Plastic Surgeons, fellows, residents, and medical students. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):NP530–7.spa
dc.relation.references37.Perkins EJ, Edelman DA, Brewster DJ. Smartphone use and perceptions of their benefit and detriment within Australian anesthetic practice. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020;48(5):366–72.spa
dc.relation.references38.Fioratou E, Flin R, Glavin R, Patey R. Beyond monitoring: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(1):83–90.spa
dc.relation.references39.Statement on Distractions [Internet]. Asahq.org. [citado 1 de octubre de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and- guidelines/statement-on-distractionsspa
dc.relation.references40.American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Perioperative Care. Statement on distractions in the operating room. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2016;101(10):42–4.spa
dc.relation.references41.Bayramzadeh S, Aghaei P. Technology integration in complex healthcare environments: A systematic literature review. Appl Ergon. 2021;92(103351):103351.spa
dc.relation.references42.Melgarejo V, María L. Sobre el concepto de percepción. Redalyc.org. 1994.RT Journal Article SR Electronicspa
dc.relation.references43.Li J, Ye Z, Zhuang J, Okada N, Huang L, Han G. Changes of public risk perception in China: 2008-2018. Sci Total Environ. 2021;799(149453):149453spa
dc.relation.references44.Shen Z, Zhong Z, Xie J, Ding S, Li S, Li C. Development and psychometric assessment of the public health emergency risk perception scale: Under the outbreak of COVID-19. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021;8(1):87–94.spa
dc.relation.references45.Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 2004;24(2):311–22.spa
dc.relation.references46.Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - events as they happen [Internet]. Who.int. [citado 22 de septiembre de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events- as-they-happespa
dc.relation.references47.Hussey LK, Arku G. Conceptualizations of climate-related health risks among health experts and the public in Ghana. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 223:40– 50.spa
dc.relation.references48.Davidson DJ, Freudenburg WR. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environ Behav. 1996;28(3):302– 39spa
dc.relation.references49.McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Glob Environ Change. 2011;21(4):1163–72.spa
dc.relation.references50.Chen Y, Feng J, Chen A, Lee JE, An L. Risk perception of COVID-19: A comparative analysis of China and South Korea. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021;61(102373):102373.spa
dc.relation.references51.Blanco, F. Cognitive Bias. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer,spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::613 - Salud y seguridad personalspa
dc.subject.meshPrácticas clínicasspa
dc.subject.meshClinical Clerkshipeng
dc.subject.meshOperating Roomseng
dc.subject.meshSalas de cirugíaspa
dc.subject.proposalAnestesiaspa
dc.subject.proposalDistracciónspa
dc.subject.proposalPercepciónspa
dc.subject.proposalAplicación móvilspa
dc.subject.proposalSeguridad del pacientespa
dc.subject.proposalTeléfono inteligentespa
dc.titlePercepciones sobre el riesgo del uso de teléfonos inteligentes durante la práctica anestésica en salas de cirugía, en especialistas y estudiantes de posgrado en Anestesiología del Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia
dc.title.translatedPerceptions about the risk of using smartphones during anesthetic practice in operating rooms, in specialists and postgraduate students in Anesthesiology of the National University Hospital of Colombia
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médicaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1061694831.2022.pdf
Tamaño:
1.11 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Especialización Médica en Anestesiología y Reanimación

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: