Coproducción de las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en áreas protegidas : un caso de estudio en el DRMI Cuervos, San Rafael - Antioquia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorLópez Gómez, Connie Paola
dc.contributor.advisorVillegas Palacio, Clara Inés
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Arroyave, Maria Fernanda
dc.contributor.orcidLópez Gómez, Connie Paola [0000-0001-8260-944X]
dc.contributor.orcidVillegas Palacio, Clara Inés [0000-0002-8258-9191]
dc.coverage.citySan Rafael (Antioquia, Colombia)
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-26T22:58:29Z
dc.date.available2025-08-26T22:58:29Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionIlustracionesspa
dc.description.abstractDesde hace varios años se ha estudiado las relaciones de doble vía entre los sistemas biofísicos y los sistemas sociales a través de diferentes marcos conceptuales. En la última década se ha enfatizado en el marco de las Contribuciones de la Naturaleza a las Personas (CNP), mostrando cómo los seres humanos y la naturaleza1 se relacionan a través de los capitales natural y antropogénicos para la coproducción sostenida de CNP, un proceso que está mediado por las percepciones subjetivas y culturales de quienes se benefician de ellas. Esta investigación de maestría constituye un estudio de caso, analizando las percepciones de diversos actores clave del Distrito Regional de Manejo Integrado (DRMI) Cuervos, un área protegida dominada por bosques y tierras agrícolas, sobre la influencia de diferentes tipos de capital—natural y antropogénico— en la coproducción de las CNP. Utilizando un enfoque participativo en una metodología cualitativa, se involucra a los actores clave mediante talleres, encuestas y entrevistas semiestructuradas, para analizar la relación de los capitales en la coproducción de las CNP. Los resultados muestran que, para los actores involucrados en el estudio, las CNP rara vez surgen únicamente de la naturaleza; generalmente emergen de la interacción entre el capital natural y antropogénico, afectando a las personas tanto de manera positiva como negativa. Las relaciones entre los actores y su influencia en las diferentes formas de capital son fundamentales para mantener, crear o producir estas contribuciones. Comprender los beneficios que la naturaleza actualmente brinda a las personas en esta área protegida, y los capitales que los actores perciben como necesarios para su coproducción, es esencial para desarrollar futuras estrategias de gestión sostenible de recursos naturales, desarrollo rural y la salud integral del área protegida. Además, al identificar a los actores clave y su influencia en las CNP, se puede mejorar la articulación y cooperación entre los sectores público, privado y comunitario. Esta cooperación es esencial para una toma de decisiones efectiva y la gestión de los capitales, generando así impactos positivos en las CNP y mejorando la calidad de vida de las comunidades dentro del área protegida. (Tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractFor several years, bidirectional relationships between biophysical systems and social systems have been studied through various conceptual frameworks. In the last decade, the framework of Nature's Contributions to People (NCP) has been emphasized, showing how humans and nature interact through natural and anthropogenic capitals for the sustained co-production of NCP, a process mediated by the subjective and cultural perceptions of those who benefit from them. This master's research constitutes a case study, analyzing the perceptions of various key actors from the Cuervos Integrated Management Regional District (DRMI), a protected area dominated by forests and agricultural lands, regarding the influence of different types of capital—natural and anthropogenic—on the co-production of NCP. Using a participatory approach within a qualitative methodology, key actors are involved through workshops, surveys, and semi-structured interviews to analyze the relationship of capitals in the co-production of NCP. The results show that, for the actors involved in the study, NCP rarely arise solely from nature; they generally emerge from the interaction between natural and anthropogenic capital, affecting people both positively and negatively. The relationships between the actors and their influence on the different forms of capital are fundamental to maintaining, creating, or producing these contributions. Understanding the benefits that nature currently provides to people in this protected area, and the capitals that actors perceive as necessary for their co-production, is essential for developing future strategies for sustainable natural resource management, rural development, and the overall health of the protected area. Furthermore, by identifying key actors and their influence on NCP, the coordination and cooperation between public, private, and community sectors can be improved. This cooperation is essential for effective decision-making and capital management, thus generating positive impacts on NCP and improving the quality of life for communities within the protected area.eng
dc.description.curricularareaMedio Ambiente.Sede Medellín
dc.description.degreelevelMaestría
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
dc.format.extent169 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/88481
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minas
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombia
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
dc.relation.indexedLaReferencia
dc.relation.referencesAguirre, N. M. (2011). La cuenca hidrográfica en la gestión integrada de los recursos hídricos. Revista Virtual REDESMA, 5(1), 9-20. http://revistasbolivianas.umsa.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1995-10782011000100003&lng=es
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, G. (2011). Las áreas protegidas en Colombia. Universidad. Externado de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, M. G. (2011). Estado del conocimiento de la biodiversidad en Colombia y sus amenazas: Consideraciones para fortalecer la interacción ciencia-política. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 35(137), 491–507. https://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/raccef/v35n137/v35n137a08.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAuer, A., Von Below, J., Nahuelhual, L., Mastrángelo, M., Gonzalez, A., Gluch, M., ... & Paruelo, J. (2020). The role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024
dc.relation.referencesAvila-Foucat, V.S. & Rodriguez-Robayo, K.J. (2018). Determinants of livelihood diversification: The case wildlife tourism in four coastal communities in Oaxaca, Mexico. Tourism Management, 69, 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.021
dc.relation.referencesBacher, S., Galil, B. S., Nunez, M. A., Ansong, M., Cassey, P., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Fayvush, G., Hiremath, A. J., Ikegami, M., Martinou, A. F., McDermott, S. M., Preda, C., Vila, M., Weyl, O. L. F., Fernandez, R. D., & Ryan-Colton, E. (2023). Chapter 4: Impacts of invasive alien species on nature, nature’s contributions to people, and good quality of life. In: Thematic Assessment Report on Invasive Alien Species and their Control of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
dc.relation.referencesBastidas, A. (2000). Diagnóstico de fertilidad de suelos en pendientes inferiores a 25%. Boconó, estado Trujillo. Geoenseñanza, 5(2),229-246. ISSN: 1316-6077. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36050205
dc.relation.referencesBebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World development, 27(12), 2021-2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7
dc.relation.referencesBethwell, C., Sattler, C., & Stachow, U. (2022). An analytical framework to link governance, agricultural production practices, and the provision of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101402
dc.relation.referencesBiodiversity & Ecosystem Services. Roy, H. E., Pauchard, A., Stoett, P., and Renard Truong, T. (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430731
dc.relation.referencesBishop, B. P. (2012). Nature for Mental Health and Social Inclusion. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v33i1.3430
dc.relation.referencesBrauman, K. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Polasky, S., Zayas, C. N., Aumeeruddy Thomas, Y., Brancalion, P., Declerck, F., Mastrangelo, M., Nkongolo, N., Palang, H., Shannon, L., Verma, M., & Shrestha, U. B. (2020). Chapter 2.3. Status and Trends -Nature's Contributions to People (NCP). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5519476
dc.relation.referencesBruley, E., Locatelli, B., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Nature's contributions to people: Coproducing quality of life from multifunctional landscapes. Ecology and Society, 26(1):12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12031-260112
dc.relation.referencesCáceres, D., & Tapella, E. (2022). Ecosistemas y beneficios ecosistémicos. ¿Qué valoran y qué estrategias de apropiación utilizan los productores agropecuarios? Ecología Austral, 32(2), 378-394. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.0.1764
dc.relation.referencesComín, F. A., Sorando, R., Darwiche-Criado, N., García, M., & Masip, A. (2014). A protocol to prioritize wetland restoration and creation for water quality improvement in agricultural watersheds. Ecological Engineering, 66, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.059
dc.relation.referencesCook, D., Davíðsdóttir, B., & Malinauskaite, L. (2020). A cascade model and initial exploration of co-production processes underpinning the ecosystem services of geothermal areas. Renewable energy, 161, 917-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.155
dc.relation.referencesCornare. (2015). Acuerdo nro. 325 del 1 de julio de 2015: Por medio del cual se declara el distrito regional de manejo integrado Cuervos, sobre áreas identificadas como zonas excluibles de la minería en virtud del decreto 1374 de 2013 y se dictan otras disposiciones. https://www.cornare.gov.co/SIAR/Plan-de-manejo/DRMI-Cuervos/Acuerdo_325_2015.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCornare. (2019a). Plan de manejo del Distrito Regional de Manejo Integrado Cuervos. Recuperado de: https://www.cornare.gov.co/SIAR/Plan-de-manejo/DRMI-Cuervos/Plan_de_manejo_DRMI_Cuervos.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCornare. (2019b). Resolución 112-1508 del 14 de mayo de 2019: Por medio del cual se adopta el plan de manejo del Distrito Regional de Manejo Integrado DRMI "Cuervos", localizado en el municipio de San Rafael, declarado mediante Acuerdo N° 325 del 01 de julio de 2015 del Consejo Directivo de Cornare. https://www.cornare.gov.co/SIAR/Plan-de-manejo/DRMI-Cuervos/r112-1508-2019.PDF
dc.relation.referencesCornare (2021). cuerdo 442 del 26 de noviembre de 2021: Por medio del cual se crea el Sistema Regional de Áreas Protegidas del Oriente Antioqueño, SIRAP Oriente, como instrumento de gestión y articulación de actores y recursos para la preservación de los bienes y servicios ambientales y la mitigación del cambio climático. https://www.cornare.gov.co/Acuerdos/Acuerdo_422_2021_cornare.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDanêk, J., Blättler, L., Leventon, J., & Vačkářová, D. (2023). Beyond nature conservation? Perceived benefits and role of the ecosystem services framework in protected landscape areas in the Czech Republic. Ecosyst Serv 59:101504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101504
dc.relation.referencesDe Souza, M. C. (2010). Los conceptos estructurantes de la investigación cualitativa. Salud Colectiva, 6(3), 251-261.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en educación médica, 2(7), Article 7.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K. M., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., … Zl atanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , 14 , 1 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., … Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359 (6373), 270 272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
dc.relation.referencesDiez T. J. M. (2012). Cartografía social. Herramienta de intervención e investigación social compleja. El vertebramiento inercial como proceso mapeado. En J. M. Diez, & B. Escudero (eds.), Cartografía social. Investigación e intervención desde las ciencias sociales, métodos y experiencias (pp. 13-24). Comodoro Rivadavia: Universidad de la Patagonia.
dc.relation.referencesDurán, A.P., Casalegno, S., Marquet, P.A., Gaston, K.J. (2013). Representation of ecosystem services by terrestrial protected areas: Chile as a case study. PLoS One 8, e82643.
dc.relation.referencesFedele, G., Locatelli, B., & Djoudi, H. (2017). Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosystem services, 28, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011
dc.relation.referencesFelipe-Lucia MR, Martín-López B, Lavorel S, Berraquero-Díaz L, Escalera-Reyes J, et al. (2015) Ecosystem Services Flows: Why Stakeholders’ Power Relationships Matter. PLOS ONE 10(7): e0132232. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132232
dc.relation.referencesFischer, A., & Eastwood, A. (2016). Coproduction of ecosystem services as human–nature interactions—an analytical framework. Land Use Policy 52:41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.004
dc.relation.referencesGarcia Rodrigues, J., Villasante, S. & Sousa Pinto, I. (2022). Non-material nature’s contributions to people from a marine protected area support multiple dimensions of human well-being. Sustain Sci 17, 793–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01021-x
dc.relation.referencesGiacomelli, M., Sargolini, M. & Felipe-Lucia, M.R. (2024). Including the perspective of stakeholders in landscape planning through the Ecosystem Services co-production framework: an empirical exploration in Le Marche, Italy. Reg Environ Change 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-024-02184-w
dc.relation.referencesGoodwin, N.R., (2003). Five Kinds of Capital: Useful Concepts for Sustainable Development. Tufts University Medford, MA. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.15595
dc.relation.referencesGrosinger, J., Vallet, A., Palomo, I., Buclet, N., & Lavorel, S. (2021). Collective capabilities shape the co-production of nature’s contributions to people in the alpine agricultural system of the Maurienne valley, France. Reg Environ Change 21, 117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01840-9
dc.relation.referencesHill, R., Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Molnár, Z., & Van Velden, J. (2021). Nature's contributions to people: Weaving plural perspectives. One Earth, 4(7), 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.009
dc.relation.referencesHipólito, J., Sousa, B. D. S. B., Borges, R. C., de Brito, R. M., Jaffé, R., Dias, S., ... & Giannini, T. C. (2019). Valuing nature's contribution to people: The pollination services provided by two protected areas in Brazil. Global Ecology and Conservation, 20, e00782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00782
dc.relation.referencesHipólito, J., Viana, B. F., & Garibaldi, L. A. (2016). The value of pollinator–friendly practices: Synergies between natural and anthropogenic assets. Basic and Applied Ecology, 17(8), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.09.003
dc.relation.referencesIPBES (2018). The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Montanarella, L., Scholes, R., and Brainich, A. (eds.). Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany. 744 pages.
dc.relation.referencesIPBES (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 1148 pages. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
dc.relation.referencesIPBES (2024). Summary for Policymakers of the Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. McElwee, P. D., Harrison, P. A., van Huysen, T. L., Alonso Roldán, V., Barrios, E., Dasgupta, P., DeClerck, F., Harmáčková, Z. V., Hayman, D. T. S., Herrero, M., Kumar, R., Ley, D., Mangalagiu, D., McFarlane, R. A., Paukert, C., Pengue, W. A., Prist, P. R., Ricketts, T. H., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Saito, O., Selomane, O., Seppelt, R., Singh, P. K., Sitas, N., Smith, P., Vause, J., Molua, E. L., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., and Obura, D. (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13850289.
dc.relation.referencesIsaac, R., Albrecht, E., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Winkler, K. J., & Martín-López, B. (2023). Governing the co-production of nature’s contributions to people: the road ahead. In Advances in Ecological Research (Vol. 69, pp. 1-15). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2023.10.001
dc.relation.referencesIsaac, R., Hofmann, J., Koegst, J., Schleyer, C., & Martín-López, B. (2024). Governing anthropogenic assets for nature’s contributions to people in forests: A policy document analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 152, 103657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103657
dc.relation.referencesIsaac, R., Kachler, J., Martín-López, B., Felipe-Lucia, M.R. (2022a). Fieldwork Protocol Effects of land management on the Supply and Distribution of ecosystem services (ESuDis). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24291.84006.
dc.relation.referencesIsaac, R., Kachler, J., Winkler, K.J., Albrecht, E., Felipe-Lucia, M.R., Martín-López, B. (2022b). Governance to manage the complexity of nature’s contributions to people co- production. In: Advances in Ecological Research. Elsevier p. S0065250422000095. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2022.04.009.
dc.relation.referencesJericó-Daminello, C., Schröter, B., Mancilla Garcia, M., & Albert, C. (2021). Exploring perceptions of stakeholder roles in ecosystemservices coproduction. Ecosystem Services, 51, 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101353
dc.relation.referencesKachler, J., Isaac, R., Martín-López, B., Bonn, A., & Felipe-Lucia, M. R. (2023). Co-production of nature's contributions to people: What evidence is out there? People and Nature, 5, 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10493
dc.relation.referencesKadykalo, A. N., López-Rodriguez, M. D., Ainscough, J., Droste, N., Ryu, H., Ávila-Flores, G., … Harmáčková, Z. V. (2019). Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people.’ Ecosystems and People, 15(1), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1669713
dc.relation.referencesKockelkoren, R., Bermudez-Urdaneta, M., & Restrepo Calle, S. (2023). Participatory mapping of local stakeholders’ perceptions of nature’s contributions to people in an intensified agricultural area in the Colombian Andes. Ecosystems and People, 19(1), Article 2279584. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2279584
dc.relation.referencesKremen, C., & Merenlender, A. M. (2018). Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science, 362(6412). DOI: 10.1126/science.aau6020
dc.relation.referencesLamarque P., Meyfroidt P., Nettier B., & Lavorel S. (2014) Cómo el conocimiento y los valores de los servicios ecosistémicos influyen en la toma de decisiones de los agricultores. PLoS ONE 9(9): E107572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107572
dc.relation.referencesLamarque, P., Tappeiner, U., Turner, C. et al. (2011). Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg Environ Change 11, 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0
dc.relation.referencesLavorel, S., Locatelli, B., Colloff, M. J., & Bruley, E. (2020). Co-producing ecosystem services for adapting to climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1794), 20190119.
dc.relation.referencesLembi, R., de Moraes, A. R., & Seixas, C. S. (2024). Assessing nature’s contributions to people in a peri-urban protected area, southeast Brazil: integrating feedback loops and participatory scenario planning. Ecosystems and People, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2377636
dc.relation.referencesLemos, M.C., Agrawal, A., 2006. Environmental governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31, 297–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621.
dc.relation.referencesLocatelli, B., Bennett, E. M., Colloff, M. J., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Gorddard, R., Palomo, I., & Lavorel, S. (2024). People working with nature: a theoretical perspective on the co- production of Nature’s Contributions to People. Ecosystems and People, 20(1), 2359061. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2359061
dc.relation.referencesMannetti, L.M., Göttert, T., Zeller, U., & Esler, K.J. (2017). Expanding the protected área network in Namibia: an institutional analysis. Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.008.
dc.relation.referencesMartín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Amo, D.G.D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J.A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C., Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7, e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
dc.relation.referencesMartín-López B, Leister I, Lorenzo Cruz P, Palomo I, Grêt-Regamey A, Harrison PA, et al. (2019). Nature’s contributions to people in mountains: A review. PLoS ONE 14(6): e0217847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217847
dc.relation.referencesMayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution.
dc.relation.referencesMcElwee, P. (2021). The role of soils in learning and inspiration, physical and psychological experiences, and in supporting identities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1834). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0184
dc.relation.referencesMendoza, J.E., Solano-Gutiérrez, C. L., Gutiérrez-Chacón, C., Moncaleano, A.M., Franco, O. (Eds) (2024). Parques Nacionales Cómo Vamos - PNCV: “Parques Nacionales Naturales colombianos y su aporte a la paz con la naturaleza. Informe 2024”. Fundación Natura, Bogotá. D.C. 213pp. Informe-2024-PNCV-Parques-Nacionales-Como-Vamos.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMetzger, J. P., Fidelman, P., Sattler, C., Schröter, B., Maron, M., Eigenbrod, F., Fortin, M.-J., Hohlenwerger, C., & Rhodes, J. R. (2021). Connecting governance interventions to ecosystem services provision: A social-ecological network approach. People and Nature, 3(2), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10172
dc.relation.referencesMilheiras, S.G., Sallu, S.M., Loveridge, R. et al. (2022). Agroecological practices increase farmers’ well-being in an agricultural growth corridor in Tanzania. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42, 56 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00789-1
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (MADS). (2010). Decreto 2372 de 2010. Por el cual se reglamenta el Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas. Diario Oficial No. 47.806, 1 de julio de 2010. https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/decreto-2372-2010.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (MADS). (2015). Decreto 1076 de 2015. Por medio del cual se expide el Decreto Único Reglamentario del Sector Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Diario Oficial No. 49.523, 26 de mayo de 2015. https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Decreto-1076-de-2015.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (MADS). (2017). Política Nacional para la Gestión Integral de la Biodiversidad y sus Servicios Ecosistémicos. Política-Nacional-de-Gestión-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMóstiga, M., Armenteras, D., Vayreda, J., & Retana, J. (2023). Nature's Contributions to People (NCPs) and biodiversity hotspots: a step towards multifunctionality of conservation areas in Peru. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 21(4), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2023.09.004
dc.relation.referencesMulongoy, K.J. and S.B. Gidda (2008). The Value of Nature: Ecological, Economic, Cultural and Social Benefits of Protected Areas. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 30 pages.
dc.relation.referencesMunicipio de San Rafael. (2024). Plan de Desarrollo Municipal San Rafael 2024-2027. Recuperado: https://repositoriocdim.esap.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.14471/28565/PLAN%20DE%20DESARROLLO%20MUNICIPAL%20SAN%20RAFAEL%202024-2027.pdf?sequence=1
dc.relation.referencesMurillo-López, B. E., Castro, A. J., & Feijoo-Martínez, A. (2022). Nature’s Contributions to People Shape Sense of Place in the Coffee Cultural Landscape of Colombia. Agriculture, 12(4), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040457
dc.relation.referencesNewman, B., Wilson, K. A., Melbourne, J., Mathews, D., Wysong, M., & Iacona, G. D. (2019). The contributions of nature to people within the Yawuru Indigenous Protected Area. Conservation Science and Practice, 1(6), e16. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.16
dc.relation.referencesNicolás-Ruiz, N., Quintas-Soriano, C., Suárez, M. L., & Rosario Vidal-Abarca, M. (2023). Co-production of nature’s contributions to people in dry rivers: a case study in Murcia, Spain. Ecosystems and People, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2288953
dc.relation.referencesOtero, I., Farrell, K. N., Pueyo, S., Kallis, G., Kehoe, L., Haberl, H., … & Pe'er, G. (2020). Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth. Conservation Letters, 13(3), e12713. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12713
dc.relation.referencesPalliwoda, J., Fischer, J., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Palomo, I., Neugarten, R., Büermann, A., … Schröter, M. (2021). Ecosystem service coproduction across the zones of biosphere reserves in Europe. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1968501
dc.relation.referencesPalomo, I., Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Bennett, E. M., Martín-López, B., & Pascual, U. (2016). Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. In Advances in ecological research (Vol. 54, pp. 245-283). Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003
dc.relation.referencesPascual, U., Phelps, J., Garmendia, E., Brown, K., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Muradian, R., (2014). Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. BioScience, Volume 64, Issue 11, November 2014, Pages 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146
dc.relation.referencesPascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., ... & Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 26, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
dc.relation.referencesPrimmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D. N., Bugter, R., & Potschin, M. (2015). Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services , 16 , 158 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002
dc.relation.referencesQuandt, A., Neufeldt, H., & McCabe, J. T. (2018). Building livelihood resilience: ¿what role does agroforestry play? Climate and Development, 11(6), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1447903
dc.relation.referencesQuispe P, D. J., & Sánchez M. G. (2011). Encuestas y entrevistas en investigación científica. Revista de actualización clínica investiga, 10, 490.
dc.relation.referencesReina, C. C., Ortiz R. G., & Unger, B. (2003). Hacer talleres: una guía práctica para capacitadores. Fondo Mundial para la Naturaleza.
dc.relation.referencesResque, A. G. L., Piketty, M. G., Coudel, E., Messad, S., & Le Page, C. (2021). Co-production of ecosystem services through agricultural practices: perception of stakeholders supporting smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon. Cahiers Agricultures, 30, 20. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021006
dc.relation.referencesRiechers, M., Balázsi, Á., Abson, D. J., & Fischer, J. (2020). La influencia del cambio del paisaje en múltiples dimensiones de la conexión entre el ser humano y la naturaleza. Ecología y Sociedad, 25(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11651-250303
dc.relation.referencesRivas, K. E. S. M., Pérez-Verdín, G., Perevochtchikova, M., & de Casas, M. D. S. M. (2023). La coproducción de servicios ecosistémicos mediante Pago por Servicios Ambientales en una cuenca endorreica en Durango, México. Sociedad y Ambiente, (26), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.vi26.2693.
dc.relation.referencesSarkki, S. (2017). Governance services: Co-producing human well being with ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services , 27, 82 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.003
dc.relation.referencesSavary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S. J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., & Nelson, A. (2019). The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(3), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y
dc.relation.referencesSchirpke, U., Marino, D., Marucci, A., Palmieri, M., & Scolozzi, R. (2017). Operationalising ecosystem services for effective management of protected areas: Experiences and challenges. Ecosystem Services, 28, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.009
dc.relation.referencesSpangenberg, J. H., Görg, C., Truong, D. T., Tekken, V., Bustamante, J. V., & Settele, J. (2014). Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 10(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.884166
dc.relation.referencesStolton, S., Dudley, N., Avcıoğlu Çokçalışkan, B., Hunter, D., Ivanić, K. Z., Kanga, E., ... & Waithaka, J. (2015). Values and benefits of protected areas. Protected area governance and management, 145-168.
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia.
dc.relation.referencesUNDP, SCBD & UNEP-WCMC. (2021). Creating a Nature-Positive Future: The contribution of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. UNDP: New York, NY.
dc.relation.referencesUpadhyay, B., Burra, D. D., Nguyen, T. T., & Wyckhuys, K. A. (2020). Caught off guard: folk knowledge proves deficient when addressing invasive pests in Asian cassava systems. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0208-x
dc.relation.referencesUribe, L. J., Botiva León, M. A., Acosta, O. L., & Ramírez Jaramillo, J. C. (2016). La protección social de la población rural en Colombia: una propuesta desde la perspectiva de las familias y sus necesidades (Serie Estudios y Perspectivas, Bogotá). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). https://hdl.handle.net/11362/39659
dc.relation.referencesVallet, A., Locatelli, B., Levrel, H., Dendoncker, N., Barnaud, C., & Quispe Conde, Y. (2019). Linking equity, power, and stakeholders’ roles in relation to ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 24(2):14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10904-240214
dc.relation.referencesVallet A., Locatelli B., & Pramova E. (2020). Ecosystem services and social equity: Who controls, who benefits and who loses?. HAL Id: cirad-03014054. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007849.
dc.relation.referencesVallet, A., Locatelli, B., Valdivia-Díaz, M., Quispe Conde, Y., Matencio García, G., Ramos Criales, A., Valverde Huamanñahui, F., Ramos Criales, S., Makowski, D., & Lavorel, S. (2023). Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people. Conserv Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14182
dc.relation.referencesVaz, A. S., Kueffer, C., Kull, C. A., Richardson, D. M., Vicente, J. R., Kuhn, I., Schröter, M., Hauck, J., Bonn, A., & Honrado, J. P. (2017). Integrating ecosystem services and disservices: Insights from plant invasions. Ecosystem Services, 23, 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.017
dc.relation.referencesWhitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., Boltz, F., Capon, A. G., De Souza Dias, B. F., Ezeh, A., Frumkin, H., Gong, P., Head, P., Horton, R., Mace, G. M., Marten, R., Myers, S. S., Nishtar, S., Osofsky, S. A., Pattanayak, S. K., Pongsiri, M. J., Romanelli, C., Soucat, A., Vega, J., & Yach, D. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet, 386(10007), 1973–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1
dc.relation.referencesWinkler, K. J., Garcia Rodrigues, J., Albrecht, E., & Crockett, E. T. H. (2021). Governance of ecosystem services: A review of empirical literature. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1938235
dc.relation.referencesWorboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., Kothari, A., Feary, S., & Pulsford, I. (Eds.). (2015 Protected area governance and management. ANU Press. http://doi.org/10.22459/PAGM.04.2015
dc.relation.referencesZeweld, W., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Tesfay, G., Azadi, H., & Speelman, S. (2020). Sustainable agricultural practices, environmental risk mitigation and livelihood improvements: Empirical evidence from Northern Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 95, 103799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.002
dc.relation.referencesZoderer, B. M., Tasser, E., Carver, S., & Tappeiner, U. (2019). Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand bundles. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100938
dc.relation.referencesZorondo-Rodríguez, F., Rodríguez-Gómez, G. B., Fuenzalida, L. F., Burgos-Ayala, A., Mendoza, K., Díaz, M. J., ... & Vargas-Rodríguez, R. (2024). How do protected areas contribute to human well-being? Multiple mechanisms perceived by stakeholders in Chile. Human Ecology, 52(2), 425-444. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2618073/v1
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energía
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biología::577 - Ecología
dc.subject.lembNaturaleza - Influencia sobre los seres humanos - San Rafael (Antioquia, Colombia)
dc.subject.lembEcología humana - San Rafael (Antioquia, Colombia)
dc.subject.lembConservación de la naturaleza - San Rafael (Antioquia, Colombia)
dc.subject.proposalcapitales antropogénicosspa
dc.subject.proposalcapital naturalspa
dc.subject.proposaláreas protegidasspa
dc.subject.proposalcoproducciónspa
dc.subject.proposalcontribuciones de la naturaleza a las personasspa
dc.subject.proposalprotected areaseng
dc.subject.proposalanthropogenic capitaleng
dc.subject.proposalnatural capitaleng
dc.subject.proposalco-productioneng
dc.subject.proposalnature’s contributions to peopleeng
dc.titleCoproducción de las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas en áreas protegidas : un caso de estudio en el DRMI Cuervos, San Rafael - Antioquiaspa
dc.title.translatedCo-production of nature's contributions to people in protected areas : a case study in the Cuervos DRMI, San Rafael, Antioquiaeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantes
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentGrupos comunitarios
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentResponsables políticos
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis de Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
Tamaño:
3.99 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo