Resiliencia en agroecosistemas. Un índice bajo el enfoque de sistemas socio-ecológicos

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorVillegas Palacio, Clara Inesspa
dc.contributor.advisorBerrouet Cadavid, Lina Maríaspa
dc.contributor.authorSuarez Pardo, Andreaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-04T15:18:50Zspa
dc.date.available2021-02-04T15:18:50Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-09-15spa
dc.description.abstractAn agroecosystem resilience index is proposed against exogenous change vectors of two types: biophysical threats (extreme climatic events associated with climate change) and socio-economic threats (changes in the prices of inputs for production and changes in the prices of the final product). The index is constructed under the theoretical framework of multi-criteria analysis methods considering variables related to the natural, productive, socioeconomic and institutional systems that are weighted and grouped through expert judgment. The index is operationalized in a strategic basin in the Colombian Andes (Rio Grande Basin - CRG). The index was evaluated at the household level using information from 99 households in the basin obtained through workshops and individual interviews. The resilience index that varies in the interval [0,1] was categorized into 5 levels: very low, low, medium, high, and very high. Faced with the threat of climate change, it was obtained that 19% of the properties had low resilience, 64% medium resilience and 16% high resilience. The results in the face of the threat of changes in prices showed 23% low resilience, 65% medium resilience and 11% high resilience. Aspects such as diversity of land cover on the property, properties with forest cover with a high degree of connectivity with other patches, diversity of economic activities, availability of water sources and good relations with institutions in the area are determining factors to a high degree. of resilience against exogenous vectors of change.spa
dc.description.abstractSe propone un índice de resiliencia de agroecosistemas frente a vectores de cambio exógenos de dos tipos: amenazas de orden biofísico (eventos climáticos extremos asociados al cambio climático) y amenazas de orden socioeconómico (cambios en los precios de los insumos para producción y cambios en los precios del producto final). El índice es construido bajo el marco teórico de los métodos de análisis multicriterio considerando variables relacionadas con los sistemas natural, productivo, socioeconómico e institucional que son ponderadas y agrupadas a través de consulta con expertos. El índice es operacionalizado en una cuenca estratégica en los Andes Colombianos (cuenca del Rio Grande - CRG). El índice fue evaluado en 99 hogares de la cuenca, mediante la recopilación de información en talleres y entrevistas individuales. El índice de resiliencia propuesto varía en el intervalo [0,1], fue categorizado en 5 niveles: muy baja, baja, media, alta, y muy alta. Frente a la amenaza de cambio climático se obtuvo que el 19% de los predios presentaron resiliencia baja, el 64% resiliencia media y el 16% resiliencia alta. Los resultados frente a la amenaza de cambio en los precios (venta e insumos) presentaron un 23% resiliencia baja, un 65% resiliencia media y un 11% en resiliencia alta. Variables como diversidad de coberturas de suelo en el predio, predios con cobertura de bosque con alto grado de conectividad con otros parches, diversidad de actividades económicas, disponibilidad de fuentes de agua y buenas relaciones con las instituciones en la zona son determinantes en un alto grado de resiliencia frente a vectores de cambio exógenosspa
dc.description.additionalLínea de Investigación: Resiliencia en agroecosistemasspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.projectTrayectorias de sistemas socio-ecológicos y sus determinantes en cuencas estratégicas en un contexto de cambio ambiental. Código 110180863961spa
dc.description.sponsorshipMINCIENCIASspa
dc.format.extent170spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationSuarez-Pardo A. (2021)spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79071
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Geociencias y Medo Ambientespa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollospa
dc.relation.referencesAgudelo, C. A. R., Mazzeo, N., Díaz, I., Barral, M. P., Piñeiro, G., Gadino, I., & Roche, I. (2020). Land use planning in the Amazon basin : challenges from resilience thinking, 25(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesAlessa, L. (Na ia), Kliskey, A. (Anaru), Busey, R., Hinzman, L., & White, D. (2008). Freshwater vulnerabilities and resilience on the Seward Peninsula: Integrating multiple dimensions of landscape change. Global Environmental Change, 18(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.01.004spa
dc.relation.referencesAltieri, M. A., & Koohafkan, P. (2008). Enduring Farms: Climate Change, Smallholders and Traditional Farming Communities. Printed by Jutaprint 2 Solok Sungei Pinang 3, Sg. Pinang 11600 Penang, Malaysia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAltieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems, 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2spa
dc.relation.referencesArce-carriel, M. R., & Pozo-rivera, W. E. (2015). Variabilidad en la producción lechera del agrosistema IASA , según las categorías de intensidad de lluvias de Trojer, (October).spa
dc.relation.referencesBéné, C., Godfrey Wood, R., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. (2012). Resilience : New Utopia or New Tyranny ? Reflection about the Potentials and Limits of the Concept of Resilience in Relation to Vulnerability Reduction Programmes. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., & Peterson, G. D. (2005). A systems model approach to determining resilience surrogates for case studies. Ecosystems, 8(8), 945–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0141-3spa
dc.relation.referencesBerrouet Cadavid, L. M. (2018). Vulnerabilidad de sistemas sociales frente a la modificación de servicios ecosistémicos en cuencas hidrográficas de media montaña.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerrouet, L. M., Machado, J., & Villegas-Palacio, C. (2018). Vulnerability of socio—ecological systems: A conceptual Framework. Ecological Indicators, 84(July 2017), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.051spa
dc.relation.referencesBerrouet, L., Villegas-palacio, C., & Botero, V. (2020). Vulnerability of Rural Communities to Change in an Ecosystem Service Provision : Surface water supply . A Case Study in the Northern Andes , Colombia. Land Use Policy, 97(March 2019), 104737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104737spa
dc.relation.referencesBertoldi, S., Fiorito, M. E., & Álvarez, M. (2006). Grupo Focal y Desarrollo local : aportes para una articulación teórico-metodológica * Focal Group and Local Development : contributions for a theoretical-methodological coordination *. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología, 33, 111–131.spa
dc.relation.referencesBiggs, R., Schluter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E. L., Burnsilver, S., Cundill, G., … Robards, M. D. (2012). Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836spa
dc.relation.referencesBizikova, L., Larkin, P., Mitchell, S., & Waldick, R. (2019). Land Use Policy An indicator set to track resilience to climate change in agriculture : A policy- maker ’ s perspective. Land Use Policy, 82(November 2018), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.057spa
dc.relation.referencesBolaños, I. (2017). Percepción Social del Riesgo por Pérdida de Servicios Ecosistémicos – Caso de Estudio Cuenca del Río Grande, Antioquia.spa
dc.relation.referencesBolaños, I. V. (2017). Percepción Social del Riesgo por Pérdida de Servicios Ecosistémicos – Caso de Estudio Cuenca del Río Grande, Antioquia.spa
dc.relation.referencesBotero, L., & Rodríguez, D. (2006). COSTO DE PRODUCCIÓN DE UN LITRO DE LECHE EN UNA PRODUCTION COST OF A LITER OF MILK IN A LIVESTOCK BOVINE DOUBLE PURPOSE SYSTEM , MAGANGUÉ , BOLIVAR, 11(2), 806–815.spa
dc.relation.referencesCabel, J. F., & Oelofse, M. (2012). An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecology and Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118spa
dc.relation.referencesCadena, X., Reina, M., & Rivera, A. (2019). Precio regulado de la leche : ineficiencias , costos y alternativas.spa
dc.relation.referencesCai, H., Lam, N. S. N., Qiang, Y., Zou, L., Correll, R. M., & Mihunov, V. (2018). A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31(July), 844–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015spa
dc.relation.referencesCardona, O. D., van Aalst, M. K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., … Sinh, B. T. (2012). Determinants of Risk : Exposure and Vulnerability, 65–108.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems, 4(8), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9spa
dc.relation.referencesCetinkaya Ciftcioglu, G. (2017). Assessment of the resilience of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes : A case study from Lefke Region of North Cyprus. Ecological Indicators, 73, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.036spa
dc.relation.referencesChapin, F. S., Kofinas, G. P., & Grove, J. M. (2009). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2spa
dc.relation.referencesCleves-leguízamo, J. A., Toro-calderón, J., & Martínez-bernal, L. F. (2017). La Estructura Agroecológica Principal ( EAP ): novedosa herramienta para planeación del uso de la tierra en agroecosistemas The Principal Agroecological Structure ( PAS ): a new tool for planning agroecosystems, 11(2), 441–449.spa
dc.relation.referencesCleves, A. (2018). Resiliencia de agroecosistemas citrícolas a la variabilidad climática en el Departamento del Meta , Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, S. L., Carpenter, S. R., Swinton, S. M., Orenstein, D. E., Childers, D. L., Gragson, T. L., … Whitmer, A. C. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social-ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(6), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1890/100068spa
dc.relation.referencesCowie, A. L., Orr, B. J., Castillo, V. M., Chasek, P., Crossman, N. D., Erlewein, A., … Welton, S. (2018). Land in balance : The scienti fi c conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality, 79(August 2017), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011spa
dc.relation.referencesCubasch, U., Wuebbles, D., Chen, D., Facchini, M. C., Frame, D., Mahowald, N., & Winther, J.-G. (2013). Introduction in Climate Change 2013. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.007spa
dc.relation.referencesCutter, S. L. (2016). Commentary Resilience to What? Resilience for Whom?, 182(2), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12174spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2016). Efectos del clima en la producción de la ganadería de leche.spa
dc.relation.referencesDarnhofer, I. (2014). Resilience and why it matters for farm management, 41(June), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbu012spa
dc.relation.referencesDarnhofer, I., Bellon, S., Dedieu, B., & Milestad, R. (2010). Review article Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems . A review, 30, 545–555.spa
dc.relation.referencesDesjardins, E., Barker, G., Dieleman, C., & Dussault, A. C. (2015). Promoting resilience. Quaterly Review of Biology, 90(2), 147–165.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., … Thomas, S. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002spa
dc.relation.referencesDuraiappah, A. K., Naeem, S., Agardy, T., Ash, N. J., Cooper, H. D., Díaz, S., … Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Ecosystems (Vol. 5). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar, E., Maass, M., Alcocer, J., & Azpra-romero, E. (2009). Diversidad de procesos funcionales en los ecosistemas., (May 2016).spa
dc.relation.referencesFolke, C. (2016). Resilience ( Republished ), 21(4).spa
dc.relation.referencesFolke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2017). Synthesis : building resilience and adaptive capacity in social – ecological systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalarza, F. B. (2009). Choices under Risk in Rural Peru, (17708).spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Múnera, V., Arias Gómez, P. A., & Vieira Agudelo, S. C. (2016). ANÁLISIS DE TENDENCIAS EN SERIES DE PRECIPITACIÓN Y TEMPERATURA DE LA CUENCA DEL RÍO GRANDE – ANTIOQUIA.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeilfus, F. (2005). 80 herramientas para el desarrollo participativo: Diagnóstico, Planificación Monitoreo y Evaluación.spa
dc.relation.referencesGunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarger, J. R. E., & Meyer, F. M. (1996). Definition of indicators for environmentally sustainable development. Chemosphere, 33(9), 1749–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(96)00194-4spa
dc.relation.referencesHASTINGS, A. (2010). Timescales, dynamics, and ecological understanding., 91(May), 3471–3480.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmann, F., Rivas, L., Carulla, J., Rivera, B., Giraldo, L. A., Guzman, S., … Farrow, A. (2003). Evolución de los Sistemas de Producción de Leche en el Trópico Latinoamericano y su interrelación con los Mercados: Un Análisis del Caso Colombiano, (0986), 1–55.spa
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM, & PNUD. (2017). TERCERA COMUNICACIÓN NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA A LA CONVENCIÓN MARCO DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS SOBRE CAMBIO CLIMÁTICOspa
dc.relation.referencesIfejika Speranza, C., Wiesmann, U., & Rist, S. (2014). An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social – ecological dynamics. Global Environmental Change, 28, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005spa
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo Londoño, A. R., & Areiza Segura, A. M. (2012). Análisis del Mercado de la Leche y Derivados Lácteos en Colombia (2008 – 2012).spa
dc.relation.referencesLeón Sicard, T., Mendoza Rodríguez, T., & Córdoba Vargas, C. (2014). LA ESTRUCTURA AGROECOLÓGICA PRINCIPAL DE LA FINCA ( EAP ): UN NUEVO CONCEPTO ÚTIL EN AGROECOLOGÍA, 9, 55–66.spa
dc.relation.referencesLescourret, F., Magda, D., Richard, G., Adam-Blondon, A.-F., Bardy, M., Baudry, J., … Soussana, J.-F. (2015). A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, Y., Shi, Y., Qureshi, S., Bruns, A., & Zhu, X. (2014). Applying the concept of spatial resilience to socio-ecological systems in the urban wetland interface. Ecological Indicators, 42, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.032spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Ridaura, S., Masera, O., & Astier, M. (2000). Evaluating the sustainability of integrated peasantry systems - The MESMIS Framework. Ileia, December 2, 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00043-2spa
dc.relation.referencesMachado, J., Villegas-Palacio, C., Loaiza, J. C., & Castañeda, D. A. (2019). Soil natural capital vulnerability to environmental change. A regional scale approach for tropical soils in the Colombian Andes. Ecological Indicators, 96(65), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.060spa
dc.relation.referencesMarsiglia Rivera, S. M. (2017). Capacidad adaptativa de los sistemas sociales ante la pérdida o deterioro de los servicios ecosistémicos.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Montes, C. (2006). Un marco conceptual para la gestión de las interacciones naturaleza- sociedad en un mundo cambiante, 229–258. Retrieved from http://www.publicacionescajamar.es/pdf/publicaciones-periodicas/cuaderno-interdisciplinar-de-desarrollo-sostenible-cuides/3/3-478.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMay, R. M. (1973). Qualitative Stability in Model Ecosystems, 54(3), 638–641.spa
dc.relation.referencesMccune, N. M., Guevara-hernández, F., Nahed-toral, J., Mendoza-nazar, P., Ovando-cruz, J., & Ruiz-sesma, B. (2012). Social-Ecological Resilience and Maize Farming in Chiapas, Mexico.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoscoso, L. B., Arcila, N., & Hernández, R. (2019). Cambios proyectados a 2040 en los ecosistemas de la jurisdicción de Corantioquia de acuerdo con los escenarios de cambio climático del Ideam.spa
dc.relation.referencesMumby, P. J., Chollett, I., Bozec, Y., & Wolff, N. H. (2013). Ecological resilience , robustness and vulnerability : how do these concepts benefit ecosystem management ?spa
dc.relation.referencesMunaretto, L. F., Luiz Corrêa, H., & Araújo Carneiro da Cunha, J. (2013). Um estudo sobre as características do método Delphi e de grupo focal , como técnicas na obtenção de dados em pesquisas exploratórias. Revista de Administração Da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria., 6, nú, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.5902/198346596243spa
dc.relation.referencesNarpat, J. S., Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (1998). Reviving the social system-ecosystem links in the Himalayas. Linking Social and Ecological Systems.spa
dc.relation.referencesOkpara, U. T., Stringer, L. C., Akhtar-schuster, M., Metternicht, G. I., Dallimer, M., & Requier-desjardins, M. (2018). A social-ecological systems approach is necessary to achieve land degradation neutrality. Environmental Science and Policy, 89(February), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.003spa
dc.relation.referencesONU-IAS, Biodiversity International, IGES, & UNDP. (2014). Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS).spa
dc.relation.referencesOrduño Torres, M. A., Kallas, Z., & Ornelas Herrera, S. I. (2018). Analysis of Farmers ’ Stated Risk Using Lotteries and Their Perceptions of Climate Change in the Northwest of Mexico. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9010004spa
dc.relation.referencesOviedo Torres, B. E. (2010). GENERACIÓN DE ESCENARIOS DE CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO REGIONALES Y LOCALES A PARTIR DE MODELOS GLOBALES - GUÍA PARA TOMADORES DE DECISIONES.spa
dc.relation.referencesPanpakdee, C., & Limnirankul, B. (2017). Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Indicators for assessing social-ecological resilience : A case study of organic rice production in northern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.003spa
dc.relation.referencesPeterson, C. A., Eviner, V. T., & Gaudin, A. C. M. (2018). Ways forward for resilience research in agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 162(February 2017), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.011spa
dc.relation.referencesPoveda Jaramillo, G. (2006). El Clima de Antioquia, (May).spa
dc.relation.referencesPreston, S. H. (1996). The effect of population growth on environmental quality. Population Research and Policy Review, 15(2), 95–108. Retrieved from isi:A1996UN77600001spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, A. L., & Vásquez, S. (2009). COSTOS DE PRODUCCIÓN LECHERA EN COLOMBIA, PROBLEMAS Y OPORTUNIDADES, 1–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamirez Guerra, S. (2018). Retrospectiva del sector lácteo colombiano.spa
dc.relation.referencesReed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Perkins, J. S., Atlhopheng, J. R., Mulale, K., & Favretto, N. (2015). Reorienting land degradation towards sustainable land management : Linking sustainable livelihoods with ecosystem services in rangeland systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 151, 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010spa
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo, L. F., Peña, C., & Martínez, M. F. (2019). Climate change in the city of Medellin – Colombia , throughout fifty years ( 1960-2010 ) Cambio climático en la ciudad de Medellín – Colombia , en un periodo de cincuenta años ( 1960-2010 ), 86(209), 312–318.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosenzweig, M. L. (1971). Paradox of Enrichment : Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time Paradox of Enrichment : Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time, (February). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3969.385spa
dc.relation.referencesSaranya, C., & Manikandan, G. (2013). A Study on Normalization Techniques for Privacy Preserving Data Mining, 5(3), 2701–2704.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchuschny, A., & Soto, H. (2009). Guía metodológica Diseño de indicadores compuestos de desarrollo sostenible. Naciones Unidas, 109. https://doi.org/LC/W255spa
dc.relation.referencesScoones, I. (1998). SUSTAINABLE RURAL LIVELIHOODS A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS IDS WORKING, Paper 72.spa
dc.relation.referencesSrinivasa, C., Kareemulla, K., Krishnan, P., Murthy, G. R. K., Ramesh, P., Ananthan, P. S., & Joshi, P. K. (2020). Agro-ecosystem based sustainability indicators for climate resilient agriculture in India : A conceptual framework. Ecological Indicators, (June 2018), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.038spa
dc.relation.referencesStandish, R. J., Hobbs, R. J., Mayfield, M. M., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Suding, K. N., Battaglia, L. L., … Thomas, P. A. (2014). Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is? Biological Conservation, 177, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008spa
dc.relation.referencesSterk, M., Leemput, I. A. Van De, & Thm, E. (2017). ScienceDirect How to conceptualize and operationalize resilience in socio-ecological systems ? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.003spa
dc.relation.referencesThe Resilience Alliance. (2010). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners. Resilience Alliance, 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0074-0spa
dc.relation.referencesVillegas-palacio, C., Berrouet, L., López, C., Ruiz, A., & Upegui, A. (2016). Lessons from the integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country : Three case studies on ecological , socio-cultural and economic valuation. Ecosystem Services, 22(October), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.017spa
dc.relation.referencesVirapongse, A., Brooks, S., Covelli, E., Zedalis, M., Gosz, J., Kliskey, A., & Alessa, L. (2016). A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 178, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.028spa
dc.relation.referencesWalters, C. J. ., & Holling, C. . S. . (1990). Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning, 71(6), 2060–2068.spa
dc.relation.referencesWingChing-Jones, R., Pérez, R., & Salazar, E. (2015). Condiciones ambientales y producción de leche de un hato de ganado jersey en el trópico húmedo : el caso del Módulo Lechero- SDA / UCR, (January 2008).spa
dc.relation.referencesZuluaga, E., Julián, J., Fernando, L., Julián, J., Zuluaga, E., & Restrepo, L. F. (2009). Efecto meteorológico sobre la producción y calidad de la leche en dos Municipios de Antioquia - Colombia *spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::333 - Economía de la tierra y de la energíaspa
dc.subject.proposalAgroecosystemseng
dc.subject.proposalAgroecosistemasspa
dc.subject.proposalResilienciaspa
dc.subject.proposalResilienceeng
dc.subject.proposalSistemas socio ecológicosspa
dc.subject.proposalSocioecological systemseng
dc.titleResiliencia en agroecosistemas. Un índice bajo el enfoque de sistemas socio-ecológicosspa
dc.title.alternativeResilience in agroecosystems. An index under the socio-ecological systems approachspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1020791666.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
2.45 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo