Insumos y resultados de innovación: Un análisis estructural del Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia 2019

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorSánchez Rodriguez, Erika Celene
dc.contributor.advisorJunca Rodriguez, Gustavo Adolfo
dc.contributor.authorCalderón Lesmes, Gina Marcela
dc.coverage.countryColombia
dc.coverage.temporal2019
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-06T18:07:14Z
dc.date.available2021-10-06T18:07:14Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficasspa
dc.description.abstractEl Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia – IDIC es un ejercicio de medición de las condiciones que promueven o restringen la innovación en el país, cuya estructura metodológica ha sido adaptada del Índice Global de Innovación – GII. Sin embargo, tomando como referente el estudio desarrollado por Sohn, Kim, & Jeon (2015), estos índices pueden omitir posibles relaciones estructurales entre los factores que intervienen en el desempeño innovador de los departamentos. En este trabajo de grado se plantea un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM) aplicando el método de mínimos cuadrados parciales (PLS). Utilizando los datos empíricos del IDIC 2019 se encontró que, los constructos de instituciones y capital humano e investigación guardan una relación (directa e indirecta) con la mayoría los pilares del IDIC, por lo que la focalización de intervenciones de política pública sobre estos factores tiene un efecto multiplicador en el fortalecimiento del ecosistema innovador de los departamentos de Colombia. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractThe Departmental Innovation Index for Colombia - IDIC is an exercise to measure the conditions that promote or restrict innovation in the country, whose methodological structure has been adapted from the Global Innovation Index - GII. However, taking as a reference the study developed by Sohn, Kim, & Jeon (2015), these indexes may omit possible structural relationships between the factors involved in the innovative performance of the departments. In this degree work, a structural equation model (SEM) is proposed by applying the partial least squares (PLS) method. Using the empirical data of the IDIC 2019, it was found that the constructs of institutions and human capital and research have a relationship (direct and indirect) with most of the IDIC pillars, so that the targeting of public policy interventions on these factors has a multiplier effect in strengthening the innovative ecosystem of the Colombian departments.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.description.notesIncluye anexos
dc.format.extentiv, 48 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80402
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Economíaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.relation.referencesAbubakar, A., Kassim, S. H. J., & Yusoff, M. B. (2015). Financial Development, Human Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.341spa
dc.relation.referencesAdam, I. O. (2020). ICT development, e-government development, and economic development: Does institutional quality matter? Information Technologies and International Development, 16(16), 1–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesAdobe. (2018). Creative and technology in the age of AI.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmin, M., & Mattoo, A. (2008). Human capital and the changing structure of the Indian economy. En World Bank Policy Research Paper (Número March)spa
dc.relation.referencesAnantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: A review. arXiv, 1–67.spa
dc.relation.referencesAslam, A. (2020). The hotly debate of human capital and economic growth: why institutions may matter? Quality and Quantity, 54(4), 1351–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00989-5spa
dc.relation.referencesAsongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016). The Mobile Phone in the Diffusion of Knowledge for Institutional Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 86, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.012spa
dc.relation.referencesBalconi, M. (2004). De la codification de la connaissance technologique et de l’automation informatisée: impact sur le travail et les entreprises industrielles.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1spa
dc.relation.referencesBatabyal, A. A., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). Digital technologies, knowledge spillovers, innovation policies, and economic growth in a creative region. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(5), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1073485spa
dc.relation.referencesBayliss, D. (2006). The Rise of the Creative City: Culture and Creativity in Copenhagen. European Planning Studies, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701356183spa
dc.relation.referencesBBC Mundo. (2020, marzo 4). ONU en Colombia | “Los asesinatos de líderes sociales son crímenes políticos”: Michel Forst, relator especial para los derechos humanos - BBC News Mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-51745651spa
dc.relation.referencesBekana, D. M. (2019). Political institutions, human capital and innovation: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Democratization, 26(4), 666–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1574296spa
dc.relation.referencesBianchi, C. G., Borini, F. M., & Ogasavara, M. H. (2015). Creative industry internationalisation: The impact of regulative, normative and cognitive institutions in developed and developing economies. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 8(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1504/JGBA.2015.074031spa
dc.relation.referencesBorrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2015). Innovation policy for knowledge production an R&D. En The economics of knowledge, innovation and systemic technology policy (pp. 361–382).spa
dc.relation.referencesCINEP. (2020). Controversia No. 217: Implementación de los Acuerdos de Paz en Colombia. https://www.cinep.org.co/Home2/component/k2/841-controversia-no-217-implementacion-de-los-acuerdos-de-paz-en-colombia.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesCirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). The Innovation Paradox: Developing-Country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-Up (W. Bank (ed.)). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1160-9spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). the Economicjournal Innovation and Learning: the Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(September), 569–596.spa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo Privado de Competitividad. (2019). Informe de Competitividad 2019. En Informe de competitividad 2019 (Vol. 0, Número 0). https://www.compite.pe/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/informe-de-competitividad-2019.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCornell University, WIPO, & INSEAD. (2019). The Global Innovation Index 2019 : Creating Healthy Lives - The Future of Medical Innovation. World Intellectual Property Organization.spa
dc.relation.referencesCornell University, WIPO, & INSEAD. (2020). The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation? En World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2019-chapter1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCorso, M., Martini, A., Pellegrini, L., & Paolucci, E. (2003). Technological and Organizational Tools for Knowledge Management: In Search of Configurations. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026123322900spa
dc.relation.referencesCupani, M. (2012). Análisis de Ecuaciones Estructurales: conceptos, etapas de desarrollo y un ejemplo de aplicación. Revista Tesis, 1, 186–199. http://www.revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/tesis/article/download/2884/2750spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2017). Metodología General Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica en la Industria Manufacturera –EDIT.spa
dc.relation.referencesDNP. (2019). La Agenda 2030 en Colombia - Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.ods.gov.co/esspa
dc.relation.referencesDNP Colombia. (2020). (42) Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIE7Zis0-Po&feature=emb_logospa
dc.relation.referencesDNP, & OCyT. (2015). Índice Departamental para Colombia (IDIC), 2015. www.c-230.comspa
dc.relation.referencesDNP, & OCyT. (2017). Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia (IDIC), 2017. www.dnp.gov.cospa
dc.relation.referencesDNP, & OCyT. (2018). Indice de Innovación para Colombia (IDIC), 2018. Departamento Nacional de Planeacion, 1–158. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Prensa/IndiceDepartamentalInnovacionColombia2018.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDNP, & OCyT. (2019). Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia, IDIC 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesEccles, R. G., & Williamson, O. E. (1987). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2392889spa
dc.relation.referencesFlorida, R. (2003). Cities and the Creative Class. City & Community, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00034spa
dc.relation.referencesFochler, M. (2016). Beyond and between academia and business: How Austrian biotechnology researchers describe high-tech startup companies as spaces of knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716629831spa
dc.relation.referencesFombang, M. P. S., & Adjasi, C. K. (2018). Access to finance and firm innovation. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 10(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-10-2016-0070spa
dc.relation.referencesForay, D., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2009). The knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. En The Economic Impact of Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50011-2spa
dc.relation.referencesGaviria, C. (2016). Parciales P LS Aplicada a Datos Variedad Valuados. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín.spa
dc.relation.referencesGhassib, H. B. (2010). Where Does Creativity Fit into a Productivist Industrial Model of Knowledge Production? Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673540spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-giraldo, J. C., & Hernández-rodríguez, J. C. (2009). Libertad de prensa en Colombia entre la amenaza y la manipulación. Palabra Clave, 12(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.5294/1450spa
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babib, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice Hall (ed.); 7th Editio).spa
dc.relation.referencesHair Jr, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. En Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesHair Jr, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. En Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeimeriks, G., Li, D., Lamers, W., Meijer, I., & Yegros, A. (2019). Scientific knowledge production in European regions: patterns of growth, diversity and complexity. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2123–2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1645814spa
dc.relation.referencesIvanov, A., & Voinikanis, E. (2017). A century of experimentation: Institutional approaches to knowledge production in russia from 1917 to 2017 and their implications for ip and competition equilibrium. Antitrust Bulletin, 62(4), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X17735194spa
dc.relation.referencesJibir, A., & Abdu, M. (2020). Human Capital and Propensity to Protect Intellectual Properties as Innovation Output: the Case of Nigerian Manufacturing and Service Firms. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00657-xspa
dc.relation.referencesJoint Research Centre-European Commission. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. En OECD publishing (Número 03). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5lgmz9dkcdg4.pdf?expires=1471336777&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=158391DADFA324416BB9015F3E4109AFspa
dc.relation.referencesJung, J. (2020). The fourth industrial revolution, knowledge production and higher education in South Korea. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(2), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1660047spa
dc.relation.referencesKahn, J. H. (2006). Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice: Principles, Advances, and Applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347spa
dc.relation.referencesKaraev, A., Koh, S. C. L., & Szamosi, L. T. (2007). The cluster approach and SME competitiveness: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(7), 818–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380710817273spa
dc.relation.referencesKendall, J. (2009). Local financial development and growth. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(5), 1548–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.001spa
dc.relation.referencesKhalifa, A. Ben. (2019). Direct and Complementary Effects of Investment in Knowledge-Based Economy on Innovation Performance in Tunisian Firms. 561–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0481-1spa
dc.relation.referencesKoh, C. E., Ryan, S., & Prybutok, V. R. (2005). Creating value through managing knowledge in an e-government to constituency (G2C) environment. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2005.11645853spa
dc.relation.referencesKudo, H. (2008). Does e-government guarantee accountability in public sector? Experiences in Italy and Japan. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 93–120.spa
dc.relation.referencesLa república. (2019, febrero 19). El consumo per cápita de energía fue de 1.159 kWh durante el año pasado. https://www.larepublica.co/especiales/efecto-hidroituango/el-consumo-per-capita-de-energia-fue-de-1159-kwh-durante-el-ano-pasado-2829778spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Gates, G. (2010). Innovation, human capital, and creativity. International Review of Public Administration, 14(3), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805158spa
dc.relation.referencesLohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. En Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4spa
dc.relation.referencesLott, J. R., & North, D. C. (1992). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3325144spa
dc.relation.referencesLubart, T., & Zenasni, F. (2010). A New Look at Creative Giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673549spa
dc.relation.referencesLundvall, B.-Å. (2016). The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. En The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. https://doi.org/10.26530/oapen_626406spa
dc.relation.referencesLundvall, B.-Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society, 27(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.4134/CKMS.2012.27.1.037spa
dc.relation.referencesMadsen, J. B. (2016). HEALTH, HUMAN CAPITAL FORMATION and KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: TWO CENTURIES of INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE. En Macroeconomic Dynamics (Vol. 20, Número 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100514000650spa
dc.relation.referencesMalmberg, A., & Power, D. (2005). (How) do (Firms in) clusters create knowledge? Industry and Innovation, 12(4), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500381583spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez Ávila, M., & Fierro Moreno, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: un enfoque técnico práctico / Application of the PLS-SEM technique in Knowledge Management: a practical technical approach. En RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo (Vol. 8, Número 16). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, M., & Fierro, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: un enfoque técnico práctico. RIDE - Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 8(16), 130–164. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCluskey, K. W. (2010). Comments on Ghassib’s “Where Does Creativity Fit into a Productivist Industrial Model of Knowledge Production?” Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673542spa
dc.relation.referencesMichael, S. C., & Pearce, J. A. (2009). The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802279999spa
dc.relation.referencesNour, S. S. O. M. (2010). The impact of ICT in the transformation and production of knowledge in Sudan. En Working paper series (Núm. 063; #2010). https://doi.org/10.20955/r.85.67spa
dc.relation.referencesNowotny, H., Scott, P. B., & Gibbons, M. T. (2013). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. (J. W. & Sons (ed.)).spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE/Eurostat. (2005). Manual de Oslo GUÍA PARA LA RECOGIDA E INTERPRETACIÓN DE DATOS SOBRE INNOVACIÓN Tercera edición.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-enspa
dc.relation.referencesOECD. (2010). SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation. OECD Studies.spa
dc.relation.referencesOECD, & World Bank. (2000). Korea and the Knowledge-based Economy: Making the Transition. OECD.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlofsdotter, K. (1998). Foreign direct investment, country capabilities and economic growth. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 134(3), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02707929spa
dc.relation.referencesOwen-Smith, J. (2003). From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Research Policy, 32(6), 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7spa
dc.relation.referencesPerez Monclus, R. (2016). Public banking for the cultural sector: financial instruments and the new financial intermediaries. International Review of Social Research, 5(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0008spa
dc.relation.referencesPolder, M., Van Leeuwen, G., Zand, F., & Van Beers, C. (2012a). Complementarities between Information Technologies and Innovation Modes in the Adoption and Outcome Stage : A Micro-Econometric Analysis for the Netherlands. CAED Conference, 1–38. http://doku.iab.de/fdz/events/2012/Polder.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesPolder, M., Van Leeuwen, G., Zand, F., & Van Beers, C. (2012b). Complementarities between Information Technologies and Innovation Modes in the Adoption and Outcome Stage : A Micro-Econometric Analysis for the Netherlands. CAED Conference, 1–38.spa
dc.relation.referencesRocha, H. O. (2004). Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298263spa
dc.relation.referencesSallatu, M. A., & Indarti, N. (2018). Determining Factors of Firm Survivability a Study of University Spin-Offs in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 33(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.30209spa
dc.relation.referencesSanchez-Serra, D. (2014). Talent and creative economy in French local labour systems. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11152rspa
dc.relation.referencesSchumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory ofEconomic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital Credit, Interests, and the Business Cycles.spa
dc.relation.referencesShane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731spa
dc.relation.referencesShapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation (University of Chicago Press (ed.)).spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, H., Das, A., & Joseph, D. (2007). Country-Level Determinants of E-Government Maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02040spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, K. (2002). What is the’Knowledge Economy’? Knowledge intensity and distributed knowledge bases. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, June, 32. http://eprints.utas.edu.au/1235/spa
dc.relation.referencesSohn, S. Y., Kim, D. H., & Jeon, S. Y. (2015). Re-evaluation of global innovation index based on a structural equation model. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 28(4), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1104412spa
dc.relation.referencesSørheim, R., Widding, L. Ø., Oust, M., & Madsen, Ø. (2011). Funding of university spin-off companies: A conceptual approach to financing challenges. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111106433spa
dc.relation.referencesSpiezia, V. (2011). Are ICT users more innovative? an analysis of ICT-enabled innovation in OECD firms. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2011, 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kg2d2hkn6vgspa
dc.relation.referencesSrivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2007). E-government payoffs: Evidence from cross-country data. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2007100102spa
dc.relation.referencesStiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector.spa
dc.relation.referencesStock, J. H., & Watson, M. m. (2012). Introductión to Econometrics. En British Journal of Cancer (Vol. 3).spa
dc.relation.referencesUNCTAD. (2008). Creative Economy Report 2008. The Challenge of Assessing the Creative Economy: towards Informed Policy-making. En Harvard Business Review (Vol. 8, Número 9). http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditc20082cer_en.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/56/2101733.pdf%5Cnhttp://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=1595%5Cnhttp://www.isc.hbs.edu/Innov_9211.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2013). Creative Economy Report 2013 Special Edition.spa
dc.relation.referencesVenturini, S., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2019). plssem: A Stata Package for Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares. 88(8), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v000.i00spa
dc.relation.referencesWallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R & D programs on private R & D : the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. Tha RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82–100.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345spa
dc.relation.referencesWold, H. (1975). Path Models with Latent Variables: The NIPALS Approach. En Quantitative Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-103950-9.50017-4spa
dc.relation.referencesWright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005spa
dc.relation.referencesWright, P. M., & Barney, J. B. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31–46.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao, K., O’Mahony, M., & Qamar, A. (2020). Bridging the gap in creative economy and ICT research: a regional analysis in Europe. Applied Economics, 52(29), 3153–3166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1706718spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economíaspa
dc.subject.lembRegional policyeng
dc.subject.lembPolítica regionalspa
dc.subject.lembPublic administrationeng
dc.subject.lembAdministración públicaspa
dc.subject.proposalModelo de ecuaciones estructuralesspa
dc.subject.proposalÍndice Departamental de Innovaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalStructural equation modeleng
dc.subject.proposalDepartmental Innovation Indexeng
dc.subject.proposalCapacidades de innovación departamentalspa
dc.subject.proposalDepartmental innovation capabilitieseng
dc.subject.unescoComportamiento innovadorspa
dc.subject.unescoInnovation behavioureng
dc.titleInsumos y resultados de innovación: Un análisis estructural del Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia 2019spa
dc.title.translatedInnovation inputs and outputs: A structural analysis of the Departmental Index of Innovation Index for Colombia 2019eng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1014250896.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
1.19 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias Económicas
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Ciencias Económicas