Efectos de la estimulación visual aversiva no contingente sobre la conducta de elección

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorClavijo Álvarez, Álvaro Arturospa
dc.contributor.advisorHurtado Parrado, Camilospa
dc.contributor.authorHenao Barbosa, Karen Vivianaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-25T15:54:24Zspa
dc.date.available2020-02-25T15:54:24Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-02-16spa
dc.description.abstractExposure to non-contingent aversive stimulation, such as high intensity noise, decreases self-controlled behavior in humans. In addition, physiological responses in humans exposed to aversive visual stimuli are similar to those observed in other species. This study evaluated whether the disruptive effects of non-contingent aversive stimulation on self-control are replicated by aversive visual stimulation and what the response pattern looks like in alternative contexts. We also analyzed the values of delay sensitivity (k) and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the participants in relation to self-control behavior. Non-contingent exposure to aversive visual stimulation only generated an impulsive choice pattern in the short term. The values of k and AUC did not indicate how all participants behaved. Although, the k-value has been shown to be a relatively long-lasting factor in people, it should be evaluated with caution if it can be an indicator of choice behavior in alternative situations.spa
dc.description.abstractLa exposición a estimulación aversiva no contingente, como el ruido de alta intensidad, disminuye la conducta autocontrolada en humanos. Además, las respuestas fisiológicas en humanos expuestos a imágenes aversivas son similares a las que se observan en otras especies. Este estudio evaluó, si los efectos disruptivos de la estimulación aversiva no contingente sobre el auto-contro replican con estimulación visual aversiva y cómo es el patrón de respuesta en contextos alternativos. Se analizaron también los valores de sensibilidad a la demora (k) y Área Bajo la Curva (AUC) de los participantes en relación con el comportamiento de auto-control. La exposición no contingente a estimulación visual aversiva sólo generó un patrón de elección impulsiva a corto plazo. Los valores de k y AUC no indicaron cómo se comportaron todos los participantes. Aunque, el valor de k ha mostrado ser un factor relativamente duradero en las personas, debe evaluarse con precaución sí puede ser indicador del comportamiento de elección en situaciones alternativas.spa
dc.description.additionalMagíster en Psicologíaspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent66spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75727
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Psicologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Psychological Association (2010) Principios Éticos de los Psicólogos y Código de Conducta. Recuperado de: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/documentos/pdf/comite_etica/Codigo_APA.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesAinslie, G. (1975). Specious Reward: A Behavioral Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulse Control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 4.spa
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, T. M., Volchan, E., Imbiriba, L. A., Rodrigues, E. C., Oliveira, J. M., Oliveira, L… & Vargas, C. D. (2005). A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology, 42, 255–260. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00287.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBiałaszeka, W., & Ostaszewski, P. (2012). Discounting of sequences of delayed rewards of different amounts. Behavioural Processes, 89, 39– 43.spa
dc.relation.referencesBickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 447–454spa
dc.relation.referencesBradley, M., & Lang, P.J. (2007). The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. In J.A. Coan and J. J. B. Allen (Eds.). Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 29 - 46). New York: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrunette, M., & Jacob J. (2019). Risk aversion, prudence and temperance: An experiment in gain and loss. Research in Economics, 73, 174–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2019.04.004spa
dc.relation.referencesCrosbie, J. (1998). Negative reinforcement and punishment. In K. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Human Operant Behavior (pp. 163–187). New York: Plenum Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDu, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. The Psychological Record, 52, 479-492spa
dc.relation.referencesFacchinetti, L. D., Imbiriba, L. A., Azevedo, T. M., Vargas, C. D., & Volchan, E. (2006). Postural modulation induced by pictures depicting prosocial or dangerous contexts. Neuroscience Letters, 410, 52–56.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlora, S. R., Schieferecke, T. R., & Bremenkamp, H. G. (1992). Effects of aversive noise on human self-control for positive reinforcement. The Psychological Record, 42, 505-517.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlora, S. R., Wilkerson, L. R., & Flora, D. B. (2003). Effects of cold pressor pain on human self-control for positive reinforcement. The Psychological Record, 53, 243–252.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrye, C. C., Galizio, A., Friedel, J. E., DeHart, W. B., & Odum, A. L. (2016). Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (107), e53584. DOI:10.3791/53584.spa
dc.relation.referencesGantiva, D. C., Guerra, M. P., & Vila, C. J. (2011). Validación Colombiana del Sistema Internacional de Imágenes Afectivas: Evidencias del origen transcultural de la emoción. Acta Colombiana de Psicología. 14, 103-111.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, L., Myerson, J., & Calvert, A. L. (2010). Pigeons’ discounting of probabilistic and delayed reinforcers. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 94, 113-123.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrossbard, C. L., & Mazur, J. E. (1986). A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 305-315.spa
dc.relation.referencesHurtado-Parrado, C. Bohórquez, M. C., Sánchez, C., Cifuentes, J., Forigua, J. C., & Arias-Higuera, M. (2019). Aversive control of impulsive behavior: effects of noncontingent aversive visual stimulation. Paper presented during the 45th Annual Convention Association for Behavior Analysis (Chicago, USA, May 27, 2019)spa
dc.relation.referencesHurtado-Parrado, C. Gomez, A., Cifuentes, J., Forigua, J. C., Velázquez, J. C., Amortegui, M., Tovar, D., Quintana, S., & Segura, A. (2019). Effects of non-contingent shocks on self-control behavior and preference reversal in Wistar rats. Poster presented during the Society for Quantitative Analysis of Behavior Annual Convention (Chicago, May 22, 2019).spa
dc.relation.referencesHurtado-Parrado, C., González-León, C., Arias-Higuera, M, A., Cardona, A., Medina, L, G., García-Muñoz, L… & Rico, J, L. (2017). Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task. PeerJ, 5:e4009; DOI 10.7717/peerj.4009.spa
dc.relation.referencesJimura, K., Myerson, J., Hilgard, J., Braver, T, S & Green, L. (2009). Are people really more patient than other animals? Evidence from human discounting of real liquid rewards. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16 (6), 1071-1075. DOI:10.3758/PBR.16.6.1071.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Johnson, M. W. (2015). Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 103, 87–107.spa
dc.relation.referencesLogue, A. W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 666-709.spa
dc.relation.referencesLogue, A. W., & King, G. R. (1991) Self-control and impulsiveness in adult humans when food is the reinforcer. Appetite, 17, 105-120.spa
dc.relation.referencesMazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior, Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (p. 55–73). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesMazur, J. E. (1994). Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 83-96.spa
dc.relation.referencesMazur, J. E. (2000). Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement. Behavioural Processes, 49, 1–10.spa
dc.relation.referencesMazur, J. E. (2007). Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers. Behavioural Processes, 75, 220–224spa
dc.relation.referencesMazur, J. E., & Biondi, D. R. (2009). Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: Hyperbolic versus exponential discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 197–211spa
dc.relation.referencesMazur, J. E., Stellar J. R., & Waraczynski, M. (1987). Self-control choice with electrical stimulation of the brain as a reinforcer. Behavioural Processes, 15, 143-153.spa
dc.relation.referencesMazur, J. E., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1988). On the functions relating delay, reinforce value, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 690-691.spa
dc.relation.referencesMocaiber, I., Pandelis, P., Garcia, P. M., Machado, P. W., Volchan, E., Letícia de Oliveira & Vila. J. (2011). Stimulus appraisal modulates cardiac reactivity to briefly presented mutilation pictures. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 81: 299–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.07.014spa
dc.relation.referencesMyerson, J., Green, L. & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area Under the Curve as a Measure of Discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76: 235–243.spa
dc.relation.referencesNavarick, D. J. (1982). Negative reinforcement and choice in humans. Learning and Motivation, 13, 361-377.spa
dc.relation.referencesNoussair, C, N., Trautmann, S, T & Van De Kuilen, G. (2014). Higher Order Risk Attitudes, Demographics, and Financial Decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 81, 325–355. DOI:10.1093/restud/rdt032spa
dc.relation.referencesOdum, A. L. (2011). Delay Discounting: I’m a K, You’re a K. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 427–439.spa
dc.relation.referencesOdum, A. L., & Rainaud, C. P. (2003). Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behavioural Processes, 64, 305–313.spa
dc.relation.referencesPaglieri, F. (2013). The Costs of Delay: Waiting Versus Postponing in Intertemporal Choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 99, 362–377.spa
dc.relation.referencesParker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining Nonoverlap and Trend for Single-Case Research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006spa
dc.relation.referencesPerone, M. (2003). Negative Effects of Positive Reinforcement. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 1-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetry, N. M., & Casarella, T. (1999). Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 56, 25–32.spa
dc.relation.referencesRachlin, H. (2006). Notes on Discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 425–435.spa
dc.relation.referencesRachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 15-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesRachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233-244.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaineri, A., & Rachlin, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 77-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesRakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single-subject experimentalresearch: description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1):11-33. DOI 10.1111/1467-8578.12091.spa
dc.relation.referencesResolución 8430, Título II, Capítulo 1, (1993).spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. B., Mitchell, S. H., Harriet de Wit., & Seiden, L. S. (1997). Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 353–366.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. B., Zhang, L., Mitchell, S. H., & Harriet de Wit. (1999). Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: Effect of alcohol. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 121-143.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, M. L., & Logue, A. W. (1988). Adjusting Delay to Reinforcement: Comparing Choice in Pigeons and Humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 105-117.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva, J. R. (2011). International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in Chile: A crosscultural adaptation and validation study. Terapia Psicológica, 29, 251-258.spa
dc.relation.referencesSolnick, J. V., Kannenberg, C. H., Eckerman, D. A., & Wailer, M. B. (1980). An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. Learning and Motivation, 11, 61-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesSohn, K. (2019). Understanding the order effect in eliciting risk aversion. Finance Research Letters, 30, 314–317spa
dc.relation.referencesVanderveldt, A., Oliveira, L., & Green, L. (2016). Delay Discounting: Pigeon, Rat, Human—Does It Matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 141–162.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddcPsicologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalSelf-controleng
dc.subject.proposalAuto-controlspa
dc.subject.proposalImpulsividadspa
dc.subject.proposalImpulsivenesseng
dc.subject.proposalNon-contingent aversive stimulationeng
dc.subject.proposalEstimulación aversiva no contingentespa
dc.subject.proposalTime discountingeng
dc.subject.proposalDescuento temporalspa
dc.subject.proposalChoice behavioreng
dc.subject.proposalConducta de elecciónspa
dc.subject.proposalHumanosspa
dc.subject.proposalHumanseng
dc.titleEfectos de la estimulación visual aversiva no contingente sobre la conducta de elecciónspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Efectos de la estimulación visual aversiva no contingente sobre la conducta de elección.pdf
Tamaño:
935.48 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.9 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Psicología