Economía, ambiente y paz: Modelación desde el enfoque de la economía de la complejidad

dc.contributor.advisorLeón Rodríguez, Nohraspa
dc.contributor.authorGiraldo Suárez, Ángela Isabelspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-18T20:30:11Z
dc.date.available2023-05-18T20:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionilustracionesspa
dc.description.abstractBajo una creciente demanda de recursos mayor a la regeneración del sistema biofísico (Wackernagel et al., 2021) se genera un estrés en los recursos ambientales, y la sociedad se enfrenta a incertidumbres relacionadas a su escasez y al cambio climático. En este marco, se observan conflictos que llevan a cuestionarse sobre mecanismos para comprender y adaptarse. Así, el planteamiento de Fisher y Rucki (2017) adquiere relevancia: el desarrollo económico, el funcionamiento de los ecosistemas, la paz y el manejo de los conflictos son componentes necesarios de la sostenibilidad, pero se desconoce, de manera profunda, cómo funcionan. Por tanto, el objetivo de esta investigación es analizar la presencia de comportamientos que promuevan la paz en el marco de la economía de la complejidad a partir de las dinámicas entre los sistemas económico, ambiental y social. Para ello, primero, se profundiza en un marco teórico, que abarca los tres sistemas mencionados y se indaga sobre el surgimiento de la paz en un sistema, autoorganizado y adaptativo, propio de sistemas complejos. Como elemento que conecta los subsistemas con la paz se identifica la cooperación. En segundo lugar, para reconocer emergencias que contribuyan a comprender las dinámicas que impactan la paz, se construye un modelo de simulación a partir de los modelos basados en agentes. Como hallazgos se identifica que implementar mecanismos de selección intergrupal pueden favorecer la emergencia de una paz estable y en escenarios en que se percibe escasez de recursos la estrategia no cooperativa es la que genera menos beneficios. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractUnder a growing demand for resources greater than the regeneration of the biophysical system (Wackernagel et al., 2021) stress is generated in environmental resources, and society faces uncertainties related to their scarcity and climate change. In this framework, conflicts are observed that lead to questions about mechanisms to understand and adapt. Thus, the approach of Fisher and Rucki (2017) acquires relevance: economic development, ecosystem functioning, peace, and conflict management are necessary components of sustainability, but how they work is deeply unknown. Therefore, this research aims to analyze behaviors that promote peace within the framework of the complex economy based on the dynamics between the economic, environmental, and social systems. To accomplish this, first, a theoretical framework is deepened, which covers the three mentioned systems and inquiries about the emergence of peace in a self-organized and adaptive system, typical of complex systems. Cooperation is identified as an element that connects the subsystems with peace. Second, a simulation model is built from the agent-based models to recognize emergencies that contribute to understanding the dynamics that impact peace. As findings, it is identified that implementing intergroup selection mechanisms can favor the emergence of stable peace. In scenarios in which there is a perceived scarcity of resources, the noncooperative strategy is the one that generates the least benefits.eng
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.description.notesIncluye anexosspa
dc.description.researchareaEconomía del desarrollospa
dc.format.extentxvii, 175 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83826
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Doctorado en Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.relation.referencesAguilera, F. & Alcántara, V. (1994). De la economía ambiental a la economía ecológica. CIP Ecosocial.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlier, J. M. (1998). Curso de economía ecológica (2ª ed.). Programa de las Naciones Unidasd para el Medio Ambiente. Oficina regional para América Latina y el Caribe.spa
dc.relation.referencesAllen, M., Bettinger, R., Codding, B., Jones, T. & Schwitalla, A. (2016). Resource scarcity drives lethal aggression among prehistoric hunter-gatherers in central California. PNAS, 113(43), 12120-12125. https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.1607996113spa
dc.relation.referencesArthur, W. B. (2006). Out of equilibrium economics and agent-based modeling. In L. Tesfatsion & J. Kenneth L. (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (Vol. 2, Issue 05). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02032-0spa
dc.relation.referencesArthur, W. B. (2014). Complexity economics: A different framework for economic thought. In Complexity and the Economy. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesArthur, W. B. (2015). Complexity and the Economy. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesArthur, W. B., Beinhocker, E. & Stanger, A. (2020). Complexity economics. Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute’s 2019 Fall Symposium. The Santa Fe Institute Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. 41(203). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041002001spa
dc.relation.referencesAxelrod, R., & Hammond, R. A. (2003). The evolution of ethnocentric behavior. http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesAxtell, R., Kirman, A., Couzin, I. D., Fricke, D., Hens, T., Hochberg, M. E., Mayfield, J. E., Schuster, P. & Sethi, R. (2016). Challenges of integrating complexity and evolution into economics. In D. S. Wilson & A. Kirman (Eds.), Complexity and evolution. Toward a new synthesis for economics (Ferst, pp. 65-81). The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesAzqueta, D. (2007). Introducción a la economía ambiental (2ª ed.). McGraw Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesBalci, O. (1997). Verification, validation and accreditation of simulation models. Winter Simulation Conference.spa
dc.relation.referencesBalci, O. (1998). Verification, validation, and testing. In J. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of Simulation (pp. 335-396). Jhon Wiley & Sons Incspa
dc.relation.referencesBarcellos, L. (2010a). Modelos de gestión aplicados a la sostenibilidad empresarial [tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Barcelona, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarcellos, L. (2010b). Modelos de gestión aplicados a la sostenibilidad empresarial [tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Barcelona, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesBasili, M. & Zappia, C. (2010). Ambiguity and uncertainty in Ellsberg and Shackle. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(June 2005), 449-474. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep008spa
dc.relation.referencesBenDor, T. & Scheffran, J. (2019). Agent-based modelling of environmental conflict and cooperation. Taylor and Francis Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesBentham, J. (1780). Introduction on the principles of morals and legislation.spa
dc.relation.referencesBertalanffy, L. V. (1986). Teoría general de los sistemas.spa
dc.relation.referencesBicchieri, C. (1993). Rationality and coordination. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBolddata. (2022). Number of companies worldwide surpasses 300 million. https://bolddata.nl/en/number-of-companies-worldwide-surpasses-300-million/spa
dc.relation.referencesBothello, J. & Salles-Djelic, M.-L. (2017). Evolving conceptualizations of organizational environmentalism: A path generation account. 1(27).spa
dc.relation.referencesBowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2002). The origins of human Ccooperation. SFI Working Papers. https://sfi-edu.s3.amazonaws.com/sfi-edu/production/uploads/sficom/dev/uploads/filer/d2/2b/d22b3fd4-83eb-437d-a0d8-aa64e6e7ccf5/02-08- 035.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesBrauch, H. G. (2016). Sustainable peace in the Anthropocene: Towards political geoecology and peace ecology. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, J. Grin & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace (pp. 187-236). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrauch, H. G. (2019). Sustainable peace through sustainability transition as transformative science: A peace ecology perspective in the Anthropocene. In H. G. Brauch, U. O. Spring, A. E. Collins, & S. È. O. Serrano (Eds.), Climate change, disasters, sutainability transition and peace in the Anthropocene (pp. 175-234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97562-7spa
dc.relation.referencesBrauch, H. G. & Oswald Spring, Ú. (2016). Sustainability transition and sustainable peace: Scientific and policy context, scientific concepts, and dimensions. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, J. Grin & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace (Vol. 10). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrauer, J. & Caruso, R. (2013). Economists and peacebuilding. In M. Ginty (Ed.), Routledge handbook of peacebuilding (pp. 147-158). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarrizosa, J. (2000). ¿Qué es el ambientalismo? La visión ambiental compleja. IDEA, Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.relation.referencesCaruso, R. (2010). Peace economics, Peace science and public policy on the nature of peace economics. 16(2).spa
dc.relation.referencesCEPAL. (2020). Los motores de la degradación ambiental. El modelo macroeconómico y la explotación de los recursos naturales en América Latina. Naciones Unidas.spa
dc.relation.referencesColander, D. (2013). The QWERTY keyboard and technological lock-in. https://sites.middlebury.edu/colanderdave/2017/07/16/the-qwerty-keyboard-andtechnological-lock-in/spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, P. (2016). The essence of peace? Toward a comprehensive and parsimonious model of sustainable peace. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, J. Grin & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace. (pp. 149-160). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, P. T., Fisher, J., Fry, D. P., Liebovitch, L. S., Chen-carrel, A. & Souillac, G. (2020). How to live in peace? Mapping the science of sustaining peace: A progress report. American Psychologist. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000745spa
dc.relation.referencesCostanza, R., Wainger, L., Folke, C., Mäler, K., Costanza, R. & Wainger, L. (2013). Modeling complex ecological economic systems. Toward an evolutionary of people dynamic understanding and nature. 43(8), 545-555. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1311949 .spa
dc.relation.referencesCottey, A. (2018). Environment change, economy change and reducing conflict at source. AI & SOCIETY, 33, 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0816-xspa
dc.relation.referencesCrane, A., Matten, D. & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participations, and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 107-122spa
dc.relation.referencesCumming, G. S., Olsson, P., Chapin, F. S. & Holling, C. S. (2013). Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1139-1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9725-4spa
dc.relation.referencesde Coning, C. (2020). Insights from complexity theory for peace and conflict studies. In The Palgrave encyclopedia of peace and conflict studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_134-1spa
dc.relation.referencesde Coning, C. & Krampe, F. (2021). Why peace should matter for the COP, and why COP26 is important for peace. IPI Global Observatory. https://theglobalobservatory.org/2021/11/why-peace-should-matter-for-the-copand-why-cop26-is-important-for-peace/spa
dc.relation.referencesDietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(December), 1907-1912.spa
dc.relation.referencesEoyang, G. (Director). (2014). Find the patterns by asking the right questions. https://www.hsdinstitute.org/resources/patterns-and-questions.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesEoyang, G. (2015). Peace is a pattern: Simple rules for sustainable peace. Sustaining Peace 2015spa
dc.relation.referencesEpstein, J. (2020). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. In Generative social science (pp. 4-46). Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández, E. O., Valderas, J. M. & Mateos de Cabo, R. (2004). La economía en el marco de la ciencia compleja. Encuentros Multidisciplinares, 6(17), 56-61spa
dc.relation.referencesFerro, C., Padin, C., Svensson, G., Sosa Varela, J. C., Wagner, B. & Høgevold, N. M. (2017). Validating a framework of stakeholders in connection to business sustainability efforts in supply chains. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(1), 124-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2015-0253spa
dc.relation.referencesFisher, J. & Rucki, K. (2017). Re-conceptualizing the science of sustainability: A dynamical systems approach to understanding the nexus of conflict, development, and the environment. Sustainable Development, 275(November 2016), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1656spa
dc.relation.referencesFlórez, A. & Thomas, J. (1993). La teoría general de los sistemas, 4(1-2), 111-137spa
dc.relation.referencesFoley, D. & Farmer, D. (2009, August 6). The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature, 460, 685-686. DOI: 10.1038/460685aspa
dc.relation.referencesFolke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of socialecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441- 473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511spa
dc.relation.referencesFolke, C., Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L. & Holling, C. S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.2307/26267806spa
dc.relation.referencesFolke, C., S. R. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Chapin & J. Rockstrom. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability, and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.191spa
dc.relation.referencesFoster, J. (2005). From simplistic to complex systems in economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(6), 873-892. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei083spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxon, T. J., Köhler, J., Michie, J. & Oughton, C. (2013). Towards a new complexity economics for sustainability. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(January), 187- 208. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes057spa
dc.relation.referencesFry, D. P., Souillac, G., Liebovitch, L., Coleman, P. T., Agan, K., Nicholson-Cox, E., Mason, D., Gomez, F. P. & Strauss, S. (2021). Societies within peace systems avoid war and build positive intergroup relationships. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(17). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00692-8spa
dc.relation.referencesGalán-Ordax, J. M. (2007). Evaluación integradora de políticas de agua: modelado y simulación con sociedades artificiales de agentes. Universidad de Burgos.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Valdecasas, J. I. (2016). Simulación basada en agentes. Introducción a NetLogo. CIS Centro de Investigación Sociológicas.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlobal Footprint Network National Footprint Accounts. (2018). Ecological Footprint data. Edition Downloaded. http://data.footprintnetwork.orgspa
dc.relation.referencesGöpel, M. (2016). The great Mindshift. How a new economic paradigm and sustainability transformations go hand in hand. Springer Open & Wuppertal Institute.spa
dc.relation.referencesGowdy, J., Mazzucato, M., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., van der Leeuw, S. E. & Wilson, D. S. (2016). Shaping the evolution of complex societies. In D. S. Wilson & A. Kirman (Eds.), Complexity and evolution. Toward a new synthesis for economics (1st ed., pp. 327-350). The MIT Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesGrimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., Goss-Custard, J., Grand, T., Heinz, S. K., Huse, G., Huth, A., Jepsen, J. U., Jørgensen, C., Mooij, W. M., Müller, B., Pe’er, G., Piou, C., Railsback, S. F., Robbins, A. M., … DeAngelis, D. L. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198(1-2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023spa
dc.relation.referencesGrin, J. (2016). Transitions studies: Basic ideas and analytical approaches. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace (pp. 105-121). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrin, J., Rotmans, J. & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledgespa
dc.relation.referencesGsottbauer, E. (2013). Behavioral economics and environmental policy: Theory and experiments. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.spa
dc.relation.referencesHassani-Mahmooei, B. & Parris, B. (2012a). Resource scarcity, effort allocation and environmental security: An agent-based theoretical approach. Economic Modelling, 30(January 2013), 183-192spa
dc.relation.referencesHassani-Mahmooei, B., & Parris, B. (2012b). Why might climate change not cause conflict? An agent-based computational response. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2172669 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2172669spa
dc.relation.referencesHirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Response to decline in firms, organizations and States. Harvard University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesHochschild, F. (20 de enero de 2015). La paradoja ambiental del acuerdo de paz. Diario El Espectador. https://www.elespectador.com/colombia/mas-regiones/la-paradojaambiental-del-acuerdo-de-paz-article-539073/spa
dc.relation.referencesHolland, J. (1996). Hiddeng order: How adaptation builds complexity. Helix Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(November 2005), 1-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5spa
dc.relation.referencesHolling, C. S. (2004). From complex region to complex worlds. Ecology and Society, 9(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art11/spa
dc.relation.referencesInstitute for Economics & Peace. (2018). The economic value of peace 2018. Measuring the global economic impact of violence and conflict. Institute of Economics & Peace.spa
dc.relation.referencesInstitute for Economics & Peace. (2021). The economy value of peace 2021. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/EVP-2021-web.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesJakimowic, A. (2020). The role of entropy in the development of economics. Entropy, 22(452). https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/e22040452spa
dc.relation.referencesJevons, W. S. (1866). An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines (2nd editio). Macmillan and Co.spa
dc.relation.referencesJoireman, J. (2005). Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In Understanding behavior in the context of time: theory, research, and application (pp. 289-304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market, 76(4), 728-741.spa
dc.relation.referencesKirman, A., Wilson, D. S. & Lupp, J. (2016). Introduction. In Complexity and evolution: Toward a new synthesis for economics. The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlügl, F. (2008). A validation methodology for agent-based simulations. SAC ’08: The 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 1-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesKöhler, J., de Haan, F., Holtz, G., Kubeczko, K., Moallemi, E., Papachristos, G. & Chappin, E. (2018). Modelling sustainability transitions: An assessment of approaches and challenges. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3629spa
dc.relation.referencesLaver, M. (2020). Agent-based models of polarization and ethnocentrism. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeón, N. (2006). Mecanismos para la regulación ambiental. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkänen, K., Leskinen, P., Kuikman, P. & Thomsen, M. (2016). Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production139, 139, 361-371. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652616311490spa
dc.relation.referencesLoorbach, D., van Bake, J. C., Whiteman, G. & Rotmans, J. (2010). Business strategies for transitions towards sustainable systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.645spa
dc.relation.referencesLujala, P. & Rustad, S. (2012). High-value natural resources: A blessing or a curse for peace? In P. Lujala & S. Rustad (Eds.), High-value natural resources and postconflict peacebuilding (Issue June). Earthscan.spa
dc.relation.referencesMagee, C. L. & Devezas, T. C. (2017). A simple extension of dematerialization theory: Incorporation of technical progress and the rebound effect. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117, 196-205. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesMaldonado, C. E. (2019). Emergent collective action: Complexifying the World. In F. Cante & W. T. Torres (Eds.), Nonviolent political economy. Theory and applications (1st ed., pp. 61-75). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarkard, J., Raven, R. & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013spa
dc.relation.referencesMebratu, D. (1998). Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(6), 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5spa
dc.relation.referencesMesjasz, C. (1988). Applications of systems modelling in peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 25(3)spa
dc.relation.referencesMesjasz, C. (2016). Sustainability and complexity: A few lessons from modern system thinking. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace (pp. 421-450). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesMitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorone, P. (2018). Sustainability transition towards a biobased economy: Defining, measuring, and assessing. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082631spa
dc.relation.referencesNaciones Unidas. (2022). La Agenda para el Desarrollo Sostenible. UN.Org. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/development-agenda/spa
dc.relation.referencesNaciones Unidas. Pacto Global. (2010). Lineamientos sobre responsabilidad empresarial en áreas de alto riesgo y afectadas por conflicto. ONU.spa
dc.relation.referencesNewman, M. E. J. (2009). Complex systems: A survey. I. Am. J. Phys., 79, 800-810.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiazi, M. & Hussain, A. (2011). A novel agent-based simulation framework for sensing in complex adaptive environments. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Sensors Journal, 11(2), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2010.2068044spa
dc.relation.referencesOstrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(June), 641-672spa
dc.relation.referencesOur World in Data. (2022). Fish stock and overfishing. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/fish-and-overfishing#discardsspa
dc.relation.referencesParavantis, J. (2016). From game theory to complexity science and agent-based modeling in world politics. In Intelligent Computing Systems (pp. 39-85). Springerspa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, E., & Setién, E. (2008). La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en las ciencias: Una mirada a la teoría bibliológico-informativa. Sociológica (México), 23(67).spa
dc.relation.referencesPerona, E. (2005). Ciencias de la complejidad: ¿La economía del siglo XXI? Apuntes del CENES, 25(40), 27-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesPNUMA. (2018). Economía verde. http://web.unep.org/es/rolac/econom%C3%ADa-verdespa
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M. & Kramer, M. (2011). La creación de valor compartido. Harvard Business Review América Latina, enero-febrero, 3-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesRand, B. (2018). An introduction to agent-based modeling. Santa Fe Institute.spa
dc.relation.referencesRandhir, T. O. (2016). Globalization impacts on local commons: Multiscale strategies for socioeconomic and ecological resilience. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.517spa
dc.relation.referencesRosser, J. B. & Kramer, K. (2000). Integrating the complexity vision into mathematical economics. In D. Colander (Ed.), Complexity and the reaching of Economics (pp. 209-230). Edward Elgar.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoux, C., Goldsmith, K. & Bonezzi, A. (2015). On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesSarmiento-Vásquez, A. & López-Sandoval, E. (2017). Una comparación cualitativa de la dinámica de sistemas, la simulación de eventos discretos y la simulación basada en agentes. Ingeniería Industrial, 0(035), 27. https://doi.org/10.26439/ing.ind2017.n035.1789spa
dc.relation.referencesSchasfoort, J. (2017). Complexity economics. Www.Exploring-Economics.Org/. https://www.exploring-economics.org/en/orientation/complexity-economics/spa
dc.relation.referencesScheffran, J. (2016). From a climate of complexity to sustainable peace: Viability transformations and adaptive governance in the Anthropocene. In H. G. Brauch, U. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, & J. Scheffran (Eds.), sustainability transition and sustainable peace: Scientific and policy context, scientific concepts, and dimensions (Vol. 10, pp. 305-346). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmitd, G. (1959). Causas y expansión de la revolución industrial. 83-121.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchrader, U. (2007). Moral responsibilities as consumers. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 79-96. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.606.4778&rep=rep1&ty pe=pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSen, A. (2007a). Rational fools. A critique of the behavioral foundations of economy theory. In J. Cunningham & R. Wood (Eds.), Amartya Sen. Critical assessments of contemporary economist (pp. 138-160). Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesSen, A. (2007b). Rationality and social choice. In J. Cunningham & R. Wood (Eds.), Amartya Sen. Critical assessments of contemporary economist (pp. 432-464). Routledge & Kegan Paul.spa
dc.relation.referencesSerna-Mendoza, C. A. (2015). Racionalidad económica y medio ambiente (1ª ed.). Grupo Editorial Ibáñezspa
dc.relation.referencesSeuring, S. & Mu, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. 16, 1699-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A. (1994). La riqueza de las naciones (1ª ed.). Alianza Editorial.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpangenberg, J. H. (2016). The World we see shapes the World we create: How the underlying worldviews lead to different recommendations from environmental and ecological economics – the green economy example. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 19(2), 127-146.spa
dc.relation.referencesStephenson, C. (2016). Paradigm and praxis shifts: Transition to sustainable environmental and sustainable peace praxis. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace (pp. 89-104). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuárez, A., Arias-Arévalo, P. A. & Martínez-Mera, E. (2017). Environmental sustainability in post-conflict countries: Insights for rural Colombia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9925-9spa
dc.relation.referencesUNEP (United Nation Environment Program). (2016). Global material flows and resource productivity. https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-material-flows-andresource-productivity-database-linkspa
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nations. (2022). World economic situation and prospect 2022. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wpcontent/uploads/sites/45/WESP2022_ANNEX.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesU.S. Global Change Research Program. (2017). Climate science. Special report. Fourth National Climate Assessment: Vol. Ispa
dc.relation.referencesValente, S. (2005). Sustainable development, renewable resources and technological progress. Environmental & Resource Economic, 30, 115-125spa
dc.relation.referencesVesely, S., Klöckner, C. & Brick, C. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviour as a signal of cooperativeness: Evidence from a social dilemma experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (67).spa
dc.relation.referencesVirakul, B. (2015). Global challenges, sustainable development, and their implications for organizational performance. European Business Review, 27(4), 430-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-02-2014-0018spa
dc.relation.referencesWackernagel, M., Hanscom, L., Jayasinghe, P., Lin, D., Murthy, A., Neill, E. & Raven, R. (2021). The importance of resource security for poverty eradication. Nature Sustainability, 4, 731-738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00708-4spa
dc.relation.referencesWilensky, U. (2021). NetLogo User manual 6.2.1 (Version 6.2.1).spa
dc.relation.referencesWilensky, U. & Rand, W. (2015). An introduction to agent-based modeling. Modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, D., Kirman, A. & Lupp, J. (2016). Complexity and evolution. Toward a new synthesis for economics (Introduction book). In W. David S & A. Kirman (Eds.), Complexity and evolution. Toward a new synthesis for economics (1st ed.). The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, D. S. (2016a). Two meanings of complex adaptative system. In D. S. Wilson & A. Kirman (Eds.), Complexity and evolution. Toward a new synthesis for economics (1st ed., pp. 31-46). The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, D. S. (2016b). Two meanings of complex adaptive system. In W. David S & A. Kirman (Eds.), Complexity and evolution. Toward a new synthesis for economics (1st ed., pp. 31–46). The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhite, K., Hardisty, D., & Habib, R. (2019). The elusive Green Consumer. Harvard Business Review.spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Population Review. (2022). Average age of having first child by country. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-age-of-having-firstchild-by-countryspa
dc.relation.referencesWu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human wellbeing in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 999-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::339 - Macroeconomía y temas relacionadosspa
dc.subject.jelA13 - Relación de la economía con los valores socialesspa
dc.subject.jelA12 - Relación de la economía con otras disciplinasspa
dc.subject.jelZ13 Normas sociales y capital socialspa
dc.subject.lembSustainable developmenteng
dc.subject.lembDesarrollo sosteniblespa
dc.subject.lembEconomic Development - Environmental Aspectseng
dc.subject.lembDesarrollo económico - Aspectos ambientalesspa
dc.subject.lembInternational cooperationeng
dc.subject.lembCooperación internacionalspa
dc.subject.proposalAmbientespa
dc.subject.proposalComplejidadspa
dc.subject.proposalCooperaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalEconomíaspa
dc.subject.proposalPazspa
dc.subject.proposalSostenibilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalEnvironmenteng
dc.subject.proposalComplexityeng
dc.subject.proposalCooperationeng
dc.subject.proposalEconomyeng
dc.subject.proposalPeaceeng
dc.subject.proposalSustainabilityeng
dc.titleEconomía, ambiente y paz: Modelación desde el enfoque de la economía de la complejidadspa
dc.title.translatedEconomy, environment, and peace: Modeling from the complexity economics approacheng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentGrupos comunitariosspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
29877543.2023.pdf
Tamaño:
3.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Económicas

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: