Evaluación experimental de la confianza en productores de Cadenas de Suministro agroalimentarias de la región Cundiboyacense

dc.contributor.advisorChicaiza Becerra, Liliana Alejandraspa
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa Hernández, Diana Paolaspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo Interdisciplinario en Teoría e Investigación Aplicada en Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T15:39:38Zspa
dc.date.available2020-08-21T15:39:38Zspa
dc.date.issued2020-04-24spa
dc.description.abstractObjective: Verify through an experiment if the producers’ level of confidence varies between different agrifood Supply Chains in the departments of Cundinamarca and Boyacá in Colombia. Methodology: An experiment based on Berg's trust game (1995) was designed to determine the levels of Confidence (quantities sent) and Reciprocity (quantities returned) of two samples of individuals whose main economic activity is the transformation of fruits and vegetables: 14 belonging to a long supply chain (in Boyacá) and 26 to a short supply chain (in Bogotá). Sample size was estimated using G*power. A survey and a trust game were applied. The game was double-blind, single-round, with complete information, equal initial endowments (8000 COP), multiplication factor 3, non-simulated counterpart and non-random payment. The results were processed in R software and descriptive statistics were analyzed. The assumptions for the application of parametric and non-parametric tests were checked. Through linear and Tobit regressions, possible descriptive variables of confidence and reciprocity were obtained, which were validated or refuted through the non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wicolxon test (W) for two independent samples. Results: The quantities sent and returned by long supply chain producers were 4286 (standard deviation 2928) and 4857 (standard deviation 3024). The quantities sent and returned by short supply chain producers were 5231 (standard deviation 2088) and 6923 (standard deviation 4734). Positive offers were maintained by almost all participants. These results indicate positive Confidence and Reciprocity that broadly coincide with general measures of Confidence as DANE (2019), European Social Survey (2018) and The World Values Survey (2009). Conclusions: Confidence (W = 36 p-value 0.4601, α = 5%) and Reciprocity (W = 34 p-value 0.3767, α = 5%) are not different between the two samples. However, it is not rejected that Trust may be related to the type of housing (W = 64, p-value = 0.06628, α = 10%) and marital status (W = 11, p-value = 0.09548, α = 10%), and that Reciprocity may be related to the educational level (W = 21.5, p-value = 0.05894, α = 10%). Further research is recommended to establish causal relationships.spa
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: Verificar a través de un experimento si el nivel de confianza de los productores varía entre diferentes Cadenas de Suministro agroalimentarias de la región Cundiboyacense. Metodología: Se diseñó un experimento basado en el juego de la confianza de Berg (1995) para determinar los niveles de Confianza (cantidades enviadas) y Confiabilidad (cantidades regresadas) de dos muestras de individuos cuya actividad económica principal es la transformación de frutas y verduras: 14 pertenecientes a una cadena de suministro larga (en Boyacá) y 26 a una cadena de suministro corta (en Bogotá). El tamaño de la muestra se estimó utilizando G*power. Se aplicó una encuesta y un juego de la confianza doble ciego, de una única ronda, con información completa, dotaciones iguales (8000 COP), con factor de multiplicación 3, contraparte no simulada y pago no aleatorio. Los resultados se procesaron en el software R y se analizaron estadísticas descriptivas. Se comprobaron los supuestos para la aplicación de pruebas paramétricas y no paramétricas. A través de regresiones lineales y de Tobit, se obtuvieron indicios de posibles variables descriptoras de la confianza y confiabilidad, que fueron validados o refutados a través de la prueba no paramétrica Mann-Whitney-Wicolxon (W) para dos muestras independientes. Resultados: Las cantidades enviadas y regresadas por productores de la cadena de suministro larga fueron 4286 (desviación estándar 2928) y 4857 (desviación estándar 3024). Las cantidades enviadas y regresadas por productores de cadena de suministro corta fueron 5231 (desviación estándar 2088) y 6923 (desviación estándar 4734). Casi todos los participantes mantuvieron ofertas positivas. Estos resultados indican Confianza y Confiabilidad positivas que coinciden a grandes rasgos con medidas generales de confianza como DANE (2019), European Social Survey (2018) y The World Values Survey (2009). Conclusiones: La Confianza (W=36 p-valor 0.4601, α=5%) y la Confiabilidad (W=34 p-valor 0.3767, α=5%) no son muy diferentes entre las dos muestras. Sin embargo, no se descarta que la Confianza pueda estar relacionada con el tipo de vivienda (W=64, p-valor=0.06628, α=10%) y el estado civil (W=11,p-valor=0.09548, α= 10%), y que la Confiabilidad pueda estar relacionada con el nivel educativo (W=21.5, p-valor=0.05894, α=10%). Se recomienda mayor investigación para establecer relaciones causales.spa
dc.description.additionalLínea de Investigación: Estrategia y Organizacionesspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent251spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78151
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Públicaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administraciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAbass, O., & Ghinea, G. (2006). Integrating Confidence in Electronic Negotiations : Perspectives from an Empirical Investigation. In IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbdullah, Z., & Musa, R. (2014). The Effect of Trust and Information Sharing on Relationship Commitment in Supply Chain Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.031spa
dc.relation.referencesAcedo-Carmona, C., & Gomila, A. (2014). Personal Trust Increases Cooperation beyond General Trust. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e105559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105559spa
dc.relation.referencesAgronet. (2014). Estadísticas Agrícolas: Área, producción, rendimiento y participación. Retrieved from http://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/default.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesAgronet. (2018). Participación Departamental en la Producción y en el Área Cosechada. Retrieved from https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=2spa
dc.relation.referencesAgronet. (2019). PIB Agropecuario Nacional. Retrieved from https://www.agronet.gov.co/produccion-y-agronegocios/Paginas/ProduccionNacional.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesAkai, K., & Netzer, R. J. (2012). Trust and reciprocity among international groups: Experimental evidence from Austria and Japan. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.08.028spa
dc.relation.referencesAkmal, S., Sinulingga, S., Napitupulu, H., & Matondang, N. (2020). Effect of information technology in the implementation of electronics supply chain management to improve competitive advantage and company performance. Test Engineering and Management, 83, 3696–3700.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Ississ, M., & Bohnet, I. (2016). Risk mitigation and trust: Experimental Evidence from Jordan and the United States. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.010spa
dc.relation.referencesAlam, M. C., & Supriana, T. (2018). Analysis of supply chain management of shallots in Medan. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 122(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/122/1/012015spa
dc.relation.referencesAlós-Ferrer, C., & Farolfi, F. (2019). Trust Games and Beyond. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00887spa
dc.relation.referencesAndreoni, J., & Sanchez, A. (2019). Fooling myself or fooling observers? Avoiding social pressures by manipulating perceptions of deservingness of others. Economic Inquiry, 58(1), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12777spa
dc.relation.referencesAnsink, E., Tesfaye, A., Bouma, J., & Brouwer, R. (2017). Cooperation in watershed management: A field experiment on location, trust, and enforcement. Resource and Energy Economics, 50, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.07.004spa
dc.relation.referencesAquilar, F., & Galluccio, M. (2011). Psychological and political strategies for peace negotiation: A cognitive approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7430-3spa
dc.relation.referencesAttanasi, G., Battigalli, P., & Manzoni, E. (2016). Incomplete-Information Models of Guilt Aversion in the Trust Game. Management Science, 62(3), 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2154spa
dc.relation.referencesBaber, W. W., & Fletcher-Chen, C. C.-Y. (2015). Practical Business Negotiation (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis Ltd;Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBadraoui, I., Van der Vorst, J., & Boulaksil, Y. (2020). Horizontal logistics collaboration: an exploratory study in Morocco’s agri-food supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1604646spa
dc.relation.referencesBallou, R. H. (2004). Logística. Admiministración de la cadena de suministro (5th ed.). Pearson Educación de México.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarabanova, M., Lebedeva, L., Rastova, Y., & Uvarov, S. (2018). Use of system dynamics tools in value-oriented approach in management. Economic Annals-XXI, 173(9–10), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V173-05spa
dc.relation.referencesBarboza, G. (2019). Social collateral, dynamic incentives, and joint liability in a two‐step trust game: Lending to the unbankable. Economic Notes, 48(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12132spa
dc.relation.referencesBarr, A., & Serneels, P. (2004). Wages and Reciprocity in the Workplace. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford, 1–31.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517566spa
dc.relation.referencesBauer, D. F. (1972). Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(339), 687–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481279spa
dc.relation.referencesBchir, M. A., Rozan, A., & Willinger, M. (2012). Does higher trust lead to higher performance? An experimental investigation. Economics Bulletin, 32(3), 1873–1877.spa
dc.relation.referencesBell, V., Robinson, B., Katona, C., Fett, A. K. J., & Shergill, S. S. (2019). When trust is lost: The impact of interpersonal trauma on social interactions. Psychological Medicine, 49(6), 1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001800spa
dc.relation.referencesBellemare, C., Sebald, A., & Suetens, S. (2019). Guilt aversion in economics and psychology. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73(452), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesBelli, S. R., Rogers, R. D., & Lau, J. Y. F. (2012). Adult and adolescent social reciprocity: Experimental data from the Trust Game. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.05.004spa
dc.relation.referencesBellucci, G., Hahn, T., Deshpande, G., & Krueger, F. (2019). Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3spa
dc.relation.referencesBen-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBen-Ner, A., & Putterman, L. (2009). Trust, communication and contracts: An experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70(1–2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.01.011spa
dc.relation.referencesBerg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027spa
dc.relation.referencesBhaskar, V., & Thomas, C. (2019). Community enforcement of trust with bounded memory. Review of Economic Studies, 86(3), 1010–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy048spa
dc.relation.referencesBlue, P. R., Hu, J., Peng, L., Yu, H., Liu, H., & Zhou, X. (2019). Whose promises are worth more? How social status affects trust in promises. European Journal of Social Psychology, (August 2017), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2596spa
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., Gómez, C., & Grimalda, G. (2019). Crime-Related Exposure to Violence and Social Preferences: Experimental Evidence from Bogotá. Documentos FCE-CID Escuela de Economía.spa
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., Grimalda, G., Jiménez, L., Galvis, D. R., & Codagnone, C. (2019). Trust and trustworthiness after a land restitution program: Lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia. HICN Households in Conflict Network. Brighton.spa
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Grimalda, G. (2018a). Consultative democracy and trust. Supplement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.spa
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Grimalda, G. (2018b). Consultative democracy and trust. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 44, 55–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.10.004spa
dc.relation.referencesBogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Reyes, D. (2018). Socioeconomic stratification and stereotyping: lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia. International Review of Economics, 65(1), 77–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-017-0285-4spa
dc.relation.referencesBohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.294spa
dc.relation.referencesBoza García, |Andres, Francisco Cruz, L. E., & Cuenca Gonzalez, L. (2003). Gestión de la Confianza en la Cadena de Suministro. In V Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización. Retrieved from http://adingor.es/congresos/web/articulo/detalle/a/1339spa
dc.relation.referencesBrañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., & Lenkei, B. (2016). BMI is not related to altruism, fairness, trust or reciprocity: Experimental evidence from the field and the lab. Physiology & Behavior, 156, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.008spa
dc.relation.referencesBrañas-garza, P., Rossi, M., & Zaclicever, D. (2016). Individual’s Religiosity Enhances Trust : Latin American Evidence for the Puzzle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(2/3), 555–566.spa
dc.relation.referencesBreusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1911963 .spa
dc.relation.referencesBuelens, M., van De Woestyne, M., Mestdagh, S., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2008). Methodological issues in negotiation research: A state-of-the-art-review. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(4), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9097-3spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, J. (2012). Race, diversity and pro-social behavior in a segmented society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.11.006spa
dc.relation.referencesBuskens, V., Raub, W., van Miltenburg, N., Montoya, E. R., & van Honk, J. (2016). Testosterone Administration Moderates Effect of Social Environment on Trust in Women Depending on Second-to-Fourth Digit Ratio. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 27655. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27655spa
dc.relation.referencesCai, S., Goh, M., de Souza, R., & Li, G. (2013). Knowledge sharing in collaborative supply chains: twin effects of trust and power. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2060–2076. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.701780spa
dc.relation.referencesCalcutt, S. E., Proctor, D., Berman, S. M., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2019). Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) Are More Averse to Social Than Nonsocial Risk. Psychological Science, 30(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618811877spa
dc.relation.referencesCámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2017). Tablero de Indicadores de Bogotá y Cundinamarca. Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesCapaldo, A., & Giannoccaro, I. (2015). How does trust affect performance in the supply chain? The moderating role of interdependence. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.008spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. C. (2003). En Vos Confio : An Experimental Exploration on the Micro-Foundations of Trust, Reciprocity & Social Distance in Colombia (“Obstacles to Robust Negotiated Settlements of Civil Conflicts”).spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. C. (2005). Bringing the Lab to the Field and the Field to the Lab: More than Changing Subjects. Bogotá. Retrieved from http://economia.uniandes.edu.co/es/content/download/7218/35618/file/Cardenas MoreThanChangingSubjects june2005.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. C., & Carpenter, J. (2008). Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world. Journal of Development Studies, 44(3), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701848327spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. C., Chong, A., & Ñopo, H. (2009). To What Extent Do Latin Americans Trust, Reciprocate, and Cooperate?: Evidence from Experiments in Six Latin American Countries. Inter-American Development Bank Research Department Working paper series (Vol. 9). https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.0.0027spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. C., Dreber, A., Von Essen, E., & Ranehill, E. (2014). Gender and cooperation in children: Experiments in Colombia and Sweden. PLoS ONE, 9(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090923spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. C., & Ramos, P. A. (2006). Manual de juegos económicos para el análisis del uso colectivo de los recursos naturales (1st ed.). Peru: Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP).spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. C., Rodríguez, L. A., & Johnson, N. (2009). Collective Action for Watershed Management: Field Experiments in Colombia and Kenya. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1543826spa
dc.relation.referencesCarpenter, J. P. (2000). Negotiation in the commons: Incorporating field and experimental evidence into a theory of local collective action. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 156(4), 661–683.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, D., Bousquet, F., Janssen, M. A., Worrapimphong, K., & Cárdenas, J. C. (2011). Context matters to explain field experiments: Results from Colombian and Thai fishing villages. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.011spa
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, D., & Saysel, A. K. (2005). Simulation of common pool resource field experiments: a behavioral model of collective action. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.014spa
dc.relation.referencesChandrasekaran, N., & Raghuram, G. (2014). Agribussiness Supply Chain Management. Taylor & Francis Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2013). Experimental methods: Extra-laboratory experiments-extending the reach of experimental economics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 91, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.002spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Rajkumar, T. M., & Tomochko, N. A. (2011). The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33(3), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2010.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesChernonog, T. (2020). Inventory and marketing policy in a supply chain of a perishable product. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.019spa
dc.relation.referencesChopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2015). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410545436spa
dc.relation.referencesChu, C. L., & Leon, V. J. (2008). Single-vendor multi-buyer inventory coordination under private information. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.046spa
dc.relation.referencesCiriolo, E. (2007). Inequity aversion and trustees’ reciprocity in the trust game. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 1007–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.01.001spa
dc.relation.referencesCockroft, J. D., Adams, S. M., Matlock, D., & Dietrich, M. S. (2019). Reliability and construct validity of 3 psychometric trust scales for women seeking substance abuse treatment in a community setting. Substance Abuse, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1635967spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, B. J. (1977). Negotiation. In Organizing the World’s Money (pp. 254–268). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04006-3_9spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, J. (1988). Statistics Power Analisis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New york: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesColeman, E. A., & Lopez, M.-C. (2010). Reconstructing Cooperation from Civil Conflict: Experimental Evidence from Colombian Development Policy. Working Paper, 1–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorgnet, B., Espín, A. M., Hernán-González, R., Kujal, P., & Rassenti, S. (2016). To trust, or not to trust: Cognitive reflection in trust games. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.09.008spa
dc.relation.referencesCosta-Gomes, M. A., Huck, S., & Weizsäcker, G. (2014). Beliefs and actions in the trust game: Creating instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect. Games and Economic Behavior, 88, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.10.006spa
dc.relation.referencesCox, A. (2001). Understanding buyer and supplier power : A framework for procurement and suppy competence. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00094.xspa
dc.relation.referencesCox, J. C., Kerschbamer, R., & Neururer, D. (2016). What is trustworthiness and what drives it? Games and Economic Behavior, 98, 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.05.008spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2018). Encuesta Anual Manufacturera. Retrieved from http://formularios.dane.gov.co/encuestas/eam/index.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2019). Boletín Técnico Encuesta de Cultura Política (ECP). Bogotá. Retrieved from https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/ecpolitica/bol_ECP_19-capital-social.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDastyar, H., Rippel, D., Pannek, J., Thoben, K.-D., & Freitag, M. (2020). A Numerical Study on the Effects of Trust in Supplier Development. Processes, 8(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030300spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1984). Convenient specification tests for logit and probit models. Journal of Econometrics, 25(3), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90001-0spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, D. D., & Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental Economics : Methods , Problems , and Promise. Estudios Económicos, 8(2), 179–212.spa
dc.relation.referencesDelbufalo, E. (2012). Outcomes of inter‐organizational trust in supply chain relationships: a systematic literature review and a meta‐analysis of the empirical evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246549spa
dc.relation.referencesDi Bartolomeo, G., Dufwenberg, M., & Papa, S. (2019). The sound of silence: A license to be selfish. Economics Letters, 182, 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.05.045spa
dc.relation.referencesDiccionario de la Real Academia Española. (2019). Altruismo. Retrieved from https://dle.rae.es/altruismospa
dc.relation.referencesDietmeyer, B., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Strategic Negotiation: A breakthrough 4-step process for effective business negotiation (4th ed.). Dearborn Financial Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.01.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDoroudi, R., Sequeira, P., Marsella, S., Ergun, O., Azghandi, R., Kaeli, D., … Griffin, J. (2020). Effects of trust-based decision making in disrupted supply chains. PLoS ONE, 15(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224761spa
dc.relation.referencesDuffy, R., & Fearne, A. (2004). Buyer-supplier relationships: An investigation of moderating factors on the development of partnership characteristics and performance. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 7(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.8116spa
dc.relation.referencesDuque Oliva, E. J. (2014). Cooperación universidad - empresa: Un modelo de antecedentes y consecuencias. Universidad de Valencia.spa
dc.relation.referencesDurbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1971). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. Biometrika, 58(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.1.1spa
dc.relation.referencesDurlauf, S. N., & Blume, L. E. (2010). Microeconometrics, The New Palgrave Economics Collection. Microeconometrics (2nd ed.). Macmillan Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280816_29spa
dc.relation.referencesEconomic Organisation for Co-operation and Development. (2019). The OECD measurement of social capital project and question databank. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sdd/social-capital-project-and-question-databank.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesEmmanouilidis, C., Taisch, M., & Kiritsis, D. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in Production Management Systems. Competitive Manufacturing for Innovative Products and Services. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 398). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40361-3spa
dc.relation.referencesEngelmann, J. B., Schmid, B., De Dreu, C. K. W., Chumbley, J., & Fehr, E. (2019). On the psychology and economics of antisocial personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(26), 12781–12786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820133116spa
dc.relation.referencesErmisch, J., & Gambetta, D. (2010). Do strong family ties inhibit trust? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007spa
dc.relation.referencesEsnouf, C., Russel, M., & Bricas, N. (2010). Food system sustainability: Insights from dualine. Food System Sustainability: Insights from Dualine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567688spa
dc.relation.referencesEspín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., & Neyse, L. (2016). Heterogeneous motives in the trust game: A tale of two roles. Appendix. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00728spa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Social Survey. (2018). European Social Survey, Data and Documentation by Year. Retrieved from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/round-index.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Values Study. (2019). European Values Study, About EVS. Retrieved from https://europeanvaluesstudy.eu/about-evs/spa
dc.relation.referencesExadaktylos, F., Espín, A. M., & Brañas-Garza, P. (2013). Experimental subjects are not different. Scientific Reports, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01213spa
dc.relation.referencesFairley, K., Sanfey, A., Vyrastekova, J., & Weitzel, U. (2016). Trust and risk revisited. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.10.001spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO, & MinSalud. (2013). Perfil Nacional de Consumo de Frutas y Verduras. FAO. Bogotá. Retrieved from http://www.osancolombia.gov.co/doc/Perfil_Nacional_Consumo_FyV_Colombia_2012.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFaure, G. O. (2003). How People Negociate Resolving Disputes in Different Cultures. Advances in Group Decision and Negociation (Vol. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0989-8spa
dc.relation.referencesFehr, D., & Sutter, M. (2019). Gossip and the efficiency of interactions. Games and Economic Behavior, 113, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.003spa
dc.relation.referencesFernandez Jardón, C. M. (2019). Heterocedasticidad: Estimadores, test y posibles soluciones factibles. Retrieved from http://cjardon.webs.uvigo.es/Transparencias/Unidad7.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFinseraas, H., Hanson, T., Johnsen, Å. A., Kotsadam, A., & Torsvik, G. (2019). Trust, ethnic diversity, and personal contact: A field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 173, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.02.002spa
dc.relation.referencesFitzgerald, C. J., & Wickwire, J. H. (2012). Religion and political affiliation’s influence on trust and reciprocity among strangers. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099217spa
dc.relation.referencesFrey, V., Buskens, V., & Corten, R. (2019). Investments in and returns on network embeddedness: An experiment with trust games. Social Networks, 56(November 2018), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.07.006spa
dc.relation.referencesGallucci, M., & Perugini, M. (2000). An Experimental Test of a Game - Theoretical Model of Reciprocity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 367–389.spa
dc.relation.referencesGervais, S., & Goldstein, I. (2007). The positive effects of biased self-perceptions in firms. Review of Finance, 11(3), 453–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfm022spa
dc.relation.referencesGhosh, A., & Fedorowicz, J. (2008). The role of trust in supply chain governance. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810888019spa
dc.relation.referencesGlaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring Trust*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554926spa
dc.relation.referencesGobernación de Boyacá. (2019). Municipios de Boyacá. Retrieved from https://www.boyaca.gov.co/spa
dc.relation.referencesGobernación de Cundinamarca. (2019). Municipios de Cundinamarca. Retrieved from http://www.cundinamarca.gov.co/Home/Cundinamarca.gc/ascundi_municipioscontenidos/ccundi_municipios+spa
dc.relation.referencesGong, X., Brazil, I. A., Chang, L. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2019). Psychopathic traits are related to diminished guilt aversion and reduced trustworthiness during social decision-making. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43727-0spa
dc.relation.referencesGreiner, B., & Zednik, A. (2019). Trust and age: An experiment with current and former students. Economics Letters, 181, 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.004spa
dc.relation.referencesGrolleau, G., El Harbi, S., Saadaoui, H., & Sutan, A. (2016). The Interplay of Inequality and Reference Dependence With Trust an Experimental Study. Bulletin of Economic Research, 68(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12049spa
dc.relation.referencesGujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. The McGraw-Hill Series Economics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesGüth, W., Ockenfels, P., & Wendel, M. (1997). Cooperation based on trust. An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(1), 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(96)00045-1spa
dc.relation.referencesHaile, D., Sadrieh, A., & Verbon, H. A. A. (2008). Cross-racial envy and underinvestment in South African partnerships. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(5), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben011spa
dc.relation.referencesHajikhameneh, A., & Rubin, J. (2019). Exchange in the Absence of Legal Enforcement: Reputation and Multilateral Punishment under Uncertainty. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 35(1), 192–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewy026spa
dc.relation.referencesHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. (2019). G*Power: Statistical Power Analyses for Windows and Mac. Düsseldorf. Retrieved from http://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesHerrera, D., & Hernández, J. (2005). Cadenas alimentarias Políticas para la competitividad. Comuniica Online, (3), 17–23. Retrieved from http://webiica.iica.ac.cr/prensa/comuniica/2005/n3-esp/Pdfs/n3.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHesterberg, T., Choi, N. H., Meier, L., & Fraley, C. (2008). Least angle and ℓ 1 penalized regression: A review. Statistics Surveys, 2, 61–93. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-SS035spa
dc.relation.referencesHingley, M. (2005). Power imbalance in the UK agri-food supply channels: learning to live with the supermarkets. Journal of Marketing Management, 1376(December 2011), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257053166758spa
dc.relation.referencesHollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric Statistical Methods (3rd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesHooper, J. J., Sutherland, C. A. M., Ewing, L., Langdon, R., Caruana, N., Connaughton, E., … Rhodes, G. (2019). Should I trust you? Autistic traits predict reduced appearance‐based trust decisions. British Journal of Psychology, 110(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12357spa
dc.relation.referencesHouser, D., Schunk, D., & Winter, J. (2010). Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1–2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesHugh-Jones, D., Ron, I., & Zultan, R. (2019). Humans reciprocate by discriminating against group peers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.08.005spa
dc.relation.referencesIBM Knowledge Center. (2019). Tipo de variable SPSS. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/es/SSLVMB_sub/statistics_mainhelp_ddita/spss/base/define_variable_type_howto.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesJohansson-Stenman, O., Mahmud, M., & Martinsson, P. (2013). Trust, trust games and stated trust: Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 95, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.022spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007spa
dc.relation.referencesKeltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265spa
dc.relation.referencesKhoja, F., Adams, J., & Kauffman, R. (2011). The inside story of relationship development: Power asymmetry in a buyer-supplier relationship. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 6(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2011.038333spa
dc.relation.referencesKim, P. H., Pinkley, R. L., & Fragale, A. R. (2005). Power dynamics in negotiation. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.18378879spa
dc.relation.referencesKugler, T., Ye, B., Motro, D., & Noussair, C. N. (2019). On Trust and Disgust: Evidence From Face Reading and Virtual Reality. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619856302spa
dc.relation.referencesLambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00113-3spa
dc.relation.referencesLaMorte, W. W. (2017a). Introduction to Nonparametric Testing. Retrieved from http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704_nonparametric/BS704_Nonparametric3.html#headingtaglink_1spa
dc.relation.referencesLaMorte, W. W. (2017b). Mann Whitney U Test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). Retrieved from http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704_nonparametric/BS704_Nonparametric4.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesLee, C.-F., & Lee, A. C. (2006). Negotiation. In Encyclopedia of Finance (p. 188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26336-5_1382spa
dc.relation.referencesLemmers-Jansen, I. L. J., Fett, A. K. J., Shergill, S. S., van Kesteren, M. T. R., & Krabbendam, L. (2019). Girls-Boys: An Investigation of Gender Differences in the Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13(August). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00257spa
dc.relation.referencesLevitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2009). Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, 53(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesLi-juan, W., Hong-wei, W., & Xi-chao, S. (2012). Inventory control model for fresh agricultural products on Weibull distribution under inflation and delay in payment. Kybernetes, 41(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921211275306spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, Q., Kang, Y., Tan, L., & Chen, B. (2020). Modeling formation and operation of collaborative green innovation between manufacturer and supplier: A game theory approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062209spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, X., & Wang, Q. (2007). Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.023spa
dc.relation.referencesList, J. A. (2008). Introduction to field experiments in economics with applications to the economics of charity. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9201-9spa
dc.relation.referencesMa, F., Wylie, B. E., Luo, X., He, Z., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y., … Evans, A. D. (2019). Apologies repair trust via perceived trustworthiness and negative emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758spa
dc.relation.referencesMa, X., & Wu, Z.-X. (2019). Do sacred texts glorifying Allah facilitate Muslims’ trust and trustworthiness? Evidence from field experiments in China. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 83(July 2018), 101466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101466spa
dc.relation.referencesMacready, A. L., Hieke, S., Klimczuk-Kochańska, M., Szumiał, S., Vranken, L., & Grunert, K. G. (2020). Consumer trust in the food value chain and its impact on consumer confidence: A model for assessing consumer trust and evidence from a 5-country study in Europe. Food Policy, 92(February), 101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101880spa
dc.relation.referencesMadigan, D. (2019). Logistic & Tobit Regression. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~madigan/spa
dc.relation.referencesMarshall, G. R. (2004). Farmers cooperating in the commons? A study of collective action in salinity management. Ecological Economics, 51(3–4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.016spa
dc.relation.referencesMartini, S., & Torcal, M. (2019). Trust across political conflicts: Evidence from a survey experiment in divided societies. Party Politics, 25(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816685933spa
dc.relation.referencesMigheli, M. (2017). The Gospel and Economic Behaviour: Experimental Evidence From a Trust Game. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 88(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12139spa
dc.relation.referencesMin, H., & Zhou, G. (2002). Supply chain modeling: Past, present and future. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 43(1–2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00066-9spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de la Protección Social. (2008). Resolución 2378 de 2008 Ministerio de la Protección Social. Retrieved from https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=31169spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud. (1993). Resolución 8430 de 1993 Ministerio de Salud. Retrieved from https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDFspa
dc.relation.referencesMontgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2006). Introducción al análisis de Regresión Lineal. (CECSA, Ed.) (3rd ed.). México: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoss Kanter, R. (2004). Confidence How winnining streaks and losing streaks begin and end. Crown Publishing Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesMüller, J., & Schwieren, C. (2019). Big Five personality factors in the Trust Game. Journal of Business Economics, (0123456789), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00928-3spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, C. D., & Tingley, D. (2016). The Influence of Emotion on Trust. Political Analysis, 24(4), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpw026spa
dc.relation.referencesNasution, S. P., Supriana, T., & Lubis, Z. (2019). Supply chain analysis of papaya in Central Market, Medan Tuntungan Subdistrict, Medan City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 260(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/260/1/012026spa
dc.relation.referencesNejma, M., & Cherkaoui, A. (2020). Enabling multi-tier collaboration between supply chain dyads: a conceptual modelling framework. Supply Chain Forum, 21(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1702444spa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, K., Bhattacharya, P., Kagel, J. H., & Sengupta, A. (2019). Teams promise but do not deliver. Games and Economic Behavior, 117, 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.07.013spa
dc.relation.referencesNishina, K., Takagishi, H., Takahashi, H., Sakagami, M., & Inoue-Murayama, M. (2019). Association of polymorphism of arginine-vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1a) gene with trust and reciprocity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13(July), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00230spa
dc.relation.referencesNooteboom, B. (2010). La Dinámica De La Confianza: Comunicación, Acción Y Terceras Partes. Revista de Economía Institucional, 12, 111–133. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rei/v12n23/v12n23a6.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesOrjuela Castro, J. A. (2018). Incidencia del diseño de la cadena de suministro alimentaria en el equilibrio de flujos logísticos. Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/69976/spa
dc.relation.referencesOrjuela Castro, J. A., Calderón, M. E., & Buitrago Hernández, S. P. (2007). La cadena agroindustrial de frutas Uchuva y Tomate de Árbol. (Fondo de Publicaciones Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Ed.).spa
dc.relation.referencesOrjuela Castro, J. A., Castañeda Calderón, C. A., & Calderón, M. E. (2008). Análisis de la Cadena de Valor en las Estructuras Productivas de Uchuva y Tomate de Árbol en la Provincia de Sumapaz y el Distrito Capital. Revista Científica y Tecnológica de La Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, 13(2), 4–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesOstrom, E. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92(01), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925spa
dc.relation.referencesPan, X., & Houser, D. (2019). Why trust out-groups? The role of punishment under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 158, 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.020spa
dc.relation.referencesPardo Merino, A., & Ruiz Díaz, M. Á. (2005). Análisis de regresión lineal : El procedimiento Regresión lineal. In Análisis de datos con SPSS 13 Base (pp. 337–377). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeralta, A., & Shupp, R. (2017). Trust, Trust Attitudes and Group Membership. Journal of International Development, 29(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3294spa
dc.relation.referencesPotts, S. R., McCuddy, W. T., Jayan, D., & Porcelli, A. J. (2019). To trust, or not to trust? Individual differences in physiological reactivity predict trust under acute stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 100(September 2018), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.019spa
dc.relation.referencesPROCOLOMBIA. (2019). Inversión en el sector Agroindustria en Colombia. Retrieved from https://www.inviertaencolombia.com.co/sectores/agroindustriaspa
dc.relation.referencesQingsong, R., & Dayong, L. (2010). Comparative Analysis of Trust Games between China and America Experimental Research. In 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 5118–5121). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2010.1284spa
dc.relation.referencesRățală, C. E., Fallon, S. J., van der Schaaf, M. E., ter Huurne, N., Cools, R., & Sanfey, A. G. (2019). Catecholaminergic modulation of trust decisions. Psychopharmacology, 236(6), 1807–1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-5165-zspa
dc.relation.referencesReed, L. I., Matari, Y., Wu, M., & Janaswamy, R. (2019). Emotional Tears: An Honest Signal of Trustworthiness Increasing Prosocial Behavior? Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919872421spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, I. D., Krajbich, I., & Way, B. M. (2019). Acetaminophen influences social and economic trust. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40093-9spa
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (1st ed.). Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1300/J103v11n02_05spa
dc.relation.referencesRodrigo-González, A., Caballer-Tarazona, M., & García-Gallego, A. (2019). Active learning on trust and reciprocity for undergraduates. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164399spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero Granja, C., & Wollni, M. (2018). Opportunistic Behaviour and Trust: Experimental Results from Broccoli Farmers in Ecuador. Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12271spa
dc.relation.referencesRompf, S. A. (2015). Trust and Rationality. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07327-5spa
dc.relation.referencesRosati, A. G., Benjamin, N., Pieloch, K., & Warneken, F. (2019). Economic trust in young children. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1907). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0822spa
dc.relation.referencesRoss, W., & LaCroix, J. (1996). Multiple Meanings of Trust in Negotiation Theory and Research: A Literature Review and Integrative Model. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), 314–360. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022786spa
dc.relation.referencesRudnicki, K., De Backer, C. J. S., & Declerck, C. (2019). The effects of celebrity gossip on trust are moderated by prosociality of the gossipers. Personality and Individual Differences, 143(July 2018), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.010spa
dc.relation.referencesRychlowska, M., van der Schalk, J., Gratch, J., Breitinger, E., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2019). Beyond actions: Reparatory effects of regret in intergroup trust games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82(June 2018), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.006spa
dc.relation.referencesSaadaoui, H., El Harbi, S., & Ibanez, L. (2019). Do people trust more when they are happy or when they are sad? Evidence from an experiment. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(4), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3008spa
dc.relation.referencesSantoyo Velasco, C., & López Corral, E. (2005). Integración de la Información del Contexto, Perspectiva y Confianza en una situación de Negociación. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 22(2), 455–467. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=243020634009spa
dc.relation.referencesSchechter, L. (2007). Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: An experiment in rural Paraguay. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(2), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.006spa
dc.relation.referencesSchweinsberg, M., Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2012). Starting high and ending with nothing: The role of anchors and power in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.005spa
dc.relation.referencesSene, O. (2017). Measures of Trust and Participation in Collective Actions: Evidence from Rural Senegal. African Development Review, 29(3), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12285spa
dc.relation.referencesSERIES. (2019). Servicios de Información Espacial Shapes Departamentos de la República de Colombia. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/seriescol/shapesspa
dc.relation.referencesShapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709spa
dc.relation.referencesSheather, S. J. (2009). A Modern Approach to Regression with R. (G. Casella, S. Fienberg, & I. Olkin, Eds.), Springer Texts in Statistics. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09608-7spa
dc.relation.referencesSheskin, D. J. (2004). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures (3rd ed.). CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685909spa
dc.relation.referencesSheu, C., Rebecca Yen, H., & Chae, B. (2006). Determinants of supplier‐retailer collaboration: evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610637003spa
dc.relation.referencesSlonim, R., & Guillen, P. (2010). Gender selection discrimination: Evidence from a Trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.06.016spa
dc.relation.referencesSmeltzer, L. R. (1997). The Meaning and Origin of Trust in Buyer-Supplier Relationships. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.1997.tb00024.xspa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2017). Sentiments, Conduct and Trust in the Laboratory. Social Philosophy and Policy, 34(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052517000024spa
dc.relation.referencesSobral, F. J. B. de A. (2010). Relação Dinâmica entre Confiança, Competitividade e o Processo de Tomada de Decisão Ética em Negociação. RAE Eletrônica, 9(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-56482010000200011spa
dc.relation.referencesSoh, L. K., & Li, X. (2008). Investigating adaptive, confidence-based strategic negotiations in complex multiagent environments. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, 6(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.3233/WIA-2008-0143spa
dc.relation.referencesSridharan, R., & Simatupang, T. M. (2013). Power and trust in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 7(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVCM.2013.057344spa
dc.relation.referencesStangroom, J. (2019). Pearson Correlation Coefficient Calculator. Retrieved from https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/pearson/spa
dc.relation.referencesSterman, J. D. (2000). Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw Hill. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210417646spa
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, B. A., O’Connor, K. M., & Burris, E. R. (2006). Negotiator confidence: The impact of self-efficacy on tactics and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesSun, H., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Pozharliev, R., Bagozzi, R. P., Babiloni, F., & Wang, L. (2019). Framing a trust game as a power game greatly affects interbrain synchronicity between trustor and trustee. Social Neuroscience, 14(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2019.1566171spa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (n.d.-a). RDocumentation .pearson. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/colocr/versions/0.1.0/topics/.pearsonspa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (n.d.-b). RDocumentation bptest. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/lmtest/versions/0.9-37/topics/bptestspa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (n.d.-c). RDocumentation durbinWatsonTest. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/car/versions/3.0-3/topics/durbinWatsonTestspa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (n.d.-d). RDocumentation lm. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/tram/versions/0.3-1/topics/Lmspa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (n.d.-e). RDocumentation shapiro.test. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/stats/versions/3.6.1/topics/shapiro.testspa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (n.d.-f). RDocumentation stepAIC. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/MASS/versions/7.3-51.4/topics/stepAICspa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (n.d.-g). RDocumentation wilcox.test. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/stats/versions/3.6.1/topics/wilcox.testspa
dc.relation.referencesThe R Foundation. (2019). The R Project for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesThe World Values Survey. (2009). Results WV5 Colombia 2005-2006. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jspspa
dc.relation.referencesThe World Values Survey. (2014). Results WV6 Colombia 2012-2014. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jspspa
dc.relation.referencesThe World Values Survey. (2019). World Value Survey, Who we are? Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jspspa
dc.relation.referencesThibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092954spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100458spa
dc.relation.referencesTobin, J. (1958). Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382spa
dc.relation.referencesTu, Q., & Bulte, E. (2010). Trust, Market Participation and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from Rural China. World Development, 38(8), 1179–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.014spa
dc.relation.referencesUkko, J., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2020). Connecting relational mechanisms to performance measurement in a digital service supply chain. Production Planning and Control, 31(2–3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1631466spa
dc.relation.referencesUniversitat de Barcelona. (2009). Contrastes de normalidad. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/aplica_infor/spss/cap5-6.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesvan Nieuwenburg, D., de Groot, J. H. B., & Smeets, M. A. M. (2019). The Subtle Signaling Strength of Smells: A Masked Odor Enhances Interpersonal Trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01890spa
dc.relation.referencesVenta, A., Ha, C., Vanwoerden, S., Newlin, E., Strathearn, L., & Sharp, C. (2019). Paradoxical Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin on Trust in Inpatient and Community Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48(5), 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1399401spa
dc.relation.referencesVermue, M., Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2019). Member-to-member generalisation in trust behaviour: How do prior experiences inform prosocial behaviour towards novel ingroup and outgroup members? Current Psychology, 38(4), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00289-8spa
dc.relation.referencesVoigt, G., & Inderfurth, K. (2012). Supply chain coordination with information sharing in the presence of trust and trustworthiness. IIE Transactions, 44(8), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2011.635179spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, Z., Ye, F., & Tan, K. H. (2014). Effects of managerial ties and trust on supply chain information sharing and supplier opportunism. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 7046–7061. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.932931spa
dc.relation.referencesWooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd ed.). London: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWoolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2017). A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.003spa
dc.relation.referencesWu, J., Balliet, D., Kou, Y., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2019). Gossip in the dictator and ultimatum games: Its immediate and downstream consequences for cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00651spa
dc.relation.referencesYusianto, R., Sundana, S., Marimin, & Djatna, T. (2020). Method and mapping of trust and trustworthiness in agroindustry logistic and supply chain: A systematic review. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 397–410.spa
dc.relation.referencesZak, P. J., & Kugler, J. (2011). Neuroeconomics and International Studies: A New Understanding of Trust. International Studies Perspectives, 12(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00424.xspa
dc.relation.referencesZapata Jaramillo, C. M., & Rojas López, M. D. (2010). Una revisión crítica al modelado de la confianza a nivel organizacional. Estudios Gerenciales, 26(116), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(10)70129-7spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::633 - Cultivos de campo y de plantaciónspa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía::338 - Producciónspa
dc.subject.proposalJuego de la Confianzaspa
dc.subject.proposalTrust Gameeng
dc.subject.proposalTrusteng
dc.subject.proposalConfianzaspa
dc.subject.proposalConfiabilidadspa
dc.subject.proposalReciprocityeng
dc.subject.proposalTrustworthinesseng
dc.subject.proposalReciprocidadspa
dc.subject.proposalAgroindustriaspa
dc.subject.proposalAgroindustryeng
dc.subject.proposalColombiaspa
dc.subject.proposalColombiaeng
dc.subject.proposalCadena de Suministrospa
dc.subject.proposalSupply Chaineng
dc.titleEvaluación experimental de la confianza en productores de Cadenas de Suministro agroalimentarias de la región Cundiboyacensespa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1022397823.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
7.19 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.8 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: