Variación de la caída de la hojarasca fina a través de diferentes tipos de suelos y regiones en la amazonia.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorCHAVE, JÉRÔME
dc.contributor.advisorPEÑUELA MORA, MARIA CRISTINA
dc.contributor.authorNavarrete Encinales, Diego Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T17:17:15Z
dc.date.available2022-02-17T17:17:15Z
dc.date.issued2006-07
dc.descriptionContiene figuras, tablas y diagramas.spa
dc.description.abstractEl presente trabajo busca establecer la variación de la caída de la hojarasca fina y la dinámica del carbono a través ésta en bosques amazónicos sobre suelos contrastantes como uno de los componentes para medición de la Productividad Primaria Neta de los bosques de la cuenca del Amazonas. En algunos de los lugares donde se realizó este estudio y en otros lugares de la cuenca se están desarrollando estudios paralelos que buscan establecer la dinámica del carbono a través de los diferentes componentes de la PPN, incluyendo la producción de hojarasca fina, bajo los protocolos establecidos por RAINFOR y PANAMAZONIA.spa
dc.description.abstractLitterfall is an important component of Aboveground Net Primary Productivity because it is a very dynamic carbon pool, and because trees invest a high proportion of the carbon they fix through photosynthesis to produce leaves and reproductive structures. We measured the fine litterfall in forests in different soils in Amazonia (Podsol, Oxisol, Ultisol and Histosol) at the Chiribiquete and Amacayacu National Natural Parks, the Río Calderón Forest Reserve (Western Amazonia, Colombia), and the Nouragues Research Station (Eastern Amazonia, French Guiana). Eight 1ha plots were previously established on the different soils and 25 0.5m2 litter traps were setup in each plot. Litter was collected twice monthly during an interval of at least 1 year. I found significant differences in litterfall among the plots, exhibiting a rank of litter production between 4.05 and 9.49 Mg ha-1 y-1 (or 2.03 and 4.75 Mg C ha-1 y-1). The lower values were found in Podsol sites and the higher ones in Oxisol sites. Litter production tended to increased as rainfall decreased and temperature increased. I found a wide range of values in neighboring plots and in plots belonging to distant regions. Hence, in Amazonian forests, litterfall is strongly influenced by local climatic and edaphic properties, more than by regional ones.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Estudios Amazónicosspa
dc.description.researchareaEcosistemas, Biodiversidad y Conservaciónspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationAPAspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81005
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Amazonasspa
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto Amazónico de Investigacionesspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad Amazoníaspa
dc.publisher.programAmazonía - Amazonía - Doctorado en Estudios Amazónicosspa
dc.relation.indexedRedColspa
dc.relation.referencesACEITUNO, P. (1988). On the functioning of the southern oscillation in the South American sector. Monthly Weather Rev. 116: 505 – 524.spa
dc.relation.referencesALVAREZ-SANCHEZ, J & S. GUEVARA. 1999. Litter interception on Astrocarium mexicanum Liebm. (Palmae) in a tropical rain forest. Biotropica 31(1): 89 – 92.spa
dc.relation.referencesANDERSON, A. B. 1981. White-sand vegetation of Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica 13(3): 199 – 210.spa
dc.relation.referencesBAKER, T.R., O.L. PHILLIPS, Y. MALHI, S. ALMEIDA, L. ARROYO, A. DI FIORE, T. ERWIN, T. KILLEEN, S.G. LAURANCE, W.F. LAURANCE, S.L. LEWIS, J. LLOYD, A. MONTEAGUDO, D.A. NEILL. S. PATIÑO, N.C.A. PITMAN, J.S.M. SILVA & R. VÁSQUEZ-MARTINEZ. 2004a. Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass. Global Change Biology 10: 545 – 562.spa
dc.relation.referencesBAKER, T.R., O.L. PHILLIPS, Y. MALHI, S. ALMEIDA, L. ARROYO, A. DI FIORE, T. ERWIN, N. HIGUCHI, T. KILLEEN, S.G. LAURANCE, W.F. LAURANCE, S.L. LEWIS, A. MONTEAGUDO, D.A. NEILL,P. NÚÑEZ-VARGAS, N.C.A. PITMAN, J.S.M. SILVA & R. VÁSQUEZ-MARTINEZ. 2004b. Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 359: 353 – 365.spa
dc.relation.referencesBEGON, M., J. L. HARPER & C. R. TOWNSEND. 1990. Ecology. Blackwell scientific publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesBORCHERT, R. 1980. Phenology and ecophysiology of tropical trees: Erythrina poeppigiana O. F. Cook. Ecology 61: 1065 – 1074.spa
dc.relation.referencesBORCHERT, R. 1983. Phenology and control of flowering in tropical trees. Biotropica 15: 81 – 89.spa
dc.relation.referencesBORCHERT, R., G. RIVERA & W. HAGNAUER. 2002. Modification of vegetative phenology in tropical semideciduous forest by abnormal drought and rain. Biotropica 34: 381 – 393.spa
dc.relation.referencesBRAY, J. R. & F. GORHAM. 1964. Litter production in forest of the world. Advances in Ecological Research 2: 101 – 157.spa
dc.relation.referencesBROWN, K. S. 1987. Soil and vegetation. En: Withmore, T. C., Prance G. T. (Eds.). Biogeography and quaternary history in tropical America. Oxford Monographs in Biogeography 3, Oxford, UK, pág. 19 – 45.spa
dc.relation.referencesBROWN, S & A. E. LUGO. 1982. The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forest and their role in global carbon cycle. Biotropica 14(3): 161 – 187.spa
dc.relation.referencesCHAPMAN, C. A., L. J. CHAPMAN, T. T. STRUHSAKER, A. E. ZANNE, C. J. CLARK & J. R. PUOLSEN. 2005. A long-term evaluation of fruiting phenology: importance of climate change. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21: 1 – 14.spa
dc.relation.referencesCHAPMAN, C. A., L. J. CHAPMAN, T. T. STRUHSAKER, A. E. ZANNE, C. J. CLARK & J. R. PUOLSEN. 2005. A long-term evaluation of fruiting phenology: importance of climate change. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21: 1 – 14.spa
dc.relation.referencesCLARK, D. A., S. BROWN, D. W. KICKLIGHTER, J. Q. CHAMBERS, J. R. THOMLINSON, J. NI & E. A. HOLLAND. 2001b. Net Primary Production in tropical forests: An evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecological Applications 11(2): 371 – 384.spa
dc.relation.referencesCOX, P. M., R. A. BETTS, C. D. JONES, S. A. SPALL & I. J. TOTTERDELL. 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408: 184 – 187.spa
dc.relation.referencesCUEVAS, E. & E. MEDINA. 1986. Nutrient dynamic within Amazonian forests. I. Nutrient flux in fine litter fall and efficiency of nutrient utilization. Oecologia 68: 466 – 472.spa
dc.relation.referencesDANTAS, M. & J. PHILLIPSON. 1989. Litterfall and litter nutrient content in primary and secondary Amazonian “Tierra Firme” rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5: 27 – 36.spa
dc.relation.referencesEDWARDS, P. J. 1977. Studies of mineral cycling in a mountain rain forest in New Guinea: II. The production and disappearance of litter. Journal of Ecology 65: 971 – 992.spa
dc.relation.referencesELLIOTT, S., P. J. BAKER & R. BORCHERT. 2006. Leaf flushing during the dry season: the paradox of Asian monsoon forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography: 1 – 10spa
dc.relation.referencesEWEL, J. J. 1976. Litter fall and leaf decomposition in a tropical forest succession in eastern Guatemala. Journal of Ecology. 64: 293 – 308.spa
dc.relation.referencesEZCURRA, E. & J. BECERRA. 1987. Experimental decomposition of litter from the Tamaulipan cloud forest: A comparison of four simple models. Biotropica 19(4): 290 – 296.spa
dc.relation.referencesFINOTTI, R., S. RODRIGUES, R. CERQUEIRA & M. VIEIRA. 2003. A method to determine the minimum number of litter traps in litterfall studies. Biotropica 35(3): 419 – 421.spa
dc.relation.referencesFRANKIE, G. W., H. G. BAKER & P. A. OPLER. 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 62(3): 881 – 919.spa
dc.relation.referencesGRUBB, P. J. 1977. Control of forest growth and distribution on wet tropical mountains: with special reference to mineral nutrition. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 8: 83 – 107.spa
dc.relation.referencesGUISANDE, C., A. BARREIRO, I. MANEIRO, I. RIVEIRO & A. R. VERGARA. 2006. Tratamiento de Datos. Ediciones Días de Santos. España. 356p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHERRERA, R., C. F. JORDAN, H. KLINGE & E. MEDINA. 1978. Amazon ecosystems. Their structure and functioning with particular emphasis on nutrients. Interciencia 3: 223 – 232.spa
dc.relation.referencesHOPKIN, M. 2005. Amazon hit by worst drought for 40 years. Warming Atlantic linked to both hurricanes and rain forest drought. Nature News Online. En: http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051010/fullspa
dc.relation.referencesJENNY, H. S., P. GESSEL & F. T. BINGHAM. 1949. Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Sci. 68: 419 – 432.spa
dc.relation.referencesJUNK, W. J. 1989. Flood tolerance and trees distribution in Central Amazonian floodplains. Pp 47 – 64 en Nielsen, L. B., I. C. Nielsen & H. Baisley (eds). Tropical forest: botanical dynamics, speciation and diversity. Academic Press, London.spa
dc.relation.referencesKLING, H. & A. RODRIGUES. 1968. Litter production in an area of Amazon terra firme forest. Amazoniana 1: 287 – 310.spa
dc.relation.referencesKLINGE, H & R. HERRERA. 1977. Composite root mass in tropaquods under Amazon caatinga sands in southern Venezuela. IV Symp. Trop. Ecol. Panamá.spa
dc.relation.referencesKLING, H. 1978. Litter production in tropical ecosystems. Malayan Nature Journal. 30: 415 – 422.spa
dc.relation.referencesLAURANCE, F. W., P. M. FERANSIDE, S. G. LAURANCE, P. DELAMONICA, T. E. LOVEJOY, J. M. RANKIN DE MERONA, J. Q. CHAMBERS & C. GASCON. 1999. Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: a landscape-scale study. Forest Ecology and Management 118: 127 – 138.spa
dc.relation.referencesLIM, M. T. 1978. Litterfall and mineral nutrient content of litter in Pasoh Forest Reserve. Malayan Nature Journal 30: 375 – 380.spa
dc.relation.referencesLONGMAN, K. A. & J. JENIK. 1987. Tropical forest and its environments, 2ª Edición. Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex, Inglaterra.spa
dc.relation.referencesMACHADO, I. C., L. M. BARROS, E. V. SAMPAIO. 1997. Phenology of caatinga species at Serra Talhada, PE, Northeastern Brazil. Biotropica 29(1): 57 – 68.spa
dc.relation.referencesMALHI, Y., D. D. BALDOCCHI & P. G. JARVIS. 1999. The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forest. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 715.spa
dc.relation.referencesMALHI, Y. & J. GRACE. 2000. Tropical forest and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Tree 15: 332 - 337.spa
dc.relation.referencesMALHI, Y., O. L. PHILLIPS, J. LLOYD, T. BAKER, J. WRIGHT, S. ALMEIDA, L. ARROYO, T. FREDERIKESEN, J. GRACE, N. HIGUCHI, T. KILLEEN, W. F. LAURANCE, C. LEAO, S. L. LEWIS, P. MEIR, A. MONTEAGUDO, P. VARGAS, S. N. PANFIL, S. PATIÑO, N. C. A. PITMAN, C. QUESADA. A. RUDAS, R. SALOMAO, S. SALESKA, N. SILVA, M. SILVERIA, W. G. SOMBROEK, R. VALENCIA, R. VÁSQUEZ. 2003. An international network to monitor the structure, composition and dynamics of Amazonian forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 439 – 450.spa
dc.relation.referencesMALHI, Y., T.R. BAKER, O.L. PHILLIPS, S. ALMEIDA, E. ALVAREZ, L.ARROYO, J. CHAVE, C. CZIMCZIK, A. DI FIORE, N. HIGUCHI, T.J. KILLEEN, S.G. LAURANCE, W.F. LAURANCE, S.L. LEWIS, L.M. MERCADO MONTOYA, A. MONTEAGUDO, D.A. NEILL, P. NÚÑEZ-VARGAS, S. PATIÑO, N. C. A. PITMAN, C. A. QUESADA, R. SALOMAO, J. N. MASEDO-SILVA, A. TORRES-LEZAMA, R. VASQUEZ-MARTÍNEZ, J. TERBORGH, B. VINCETI & J. LLOYD. 2004. The above-ground coarse wood productivity of 104 Neotropical forest plots. Global Change Biology 10: 563 – 591.spa
dc.relation.referencesMEDINA, E., V. GARCIA & E. CUEVAS. 1990. Sclerophylly and oligotrophic environments: Relationships between leaf structure, mineral nutrient content, and drought resistance in tropical rain forests of the upper Rio Negro region. Biotropica 22(1): 51 – 64.spa
dc.relation.referencesMONTOYA, G. J. F. PHILLIPS & P. von HILDEBRAND. 2002. Características abióticas de la cuenca de Puerto Abeja, Parque Nacional Chiribiquete. En: Plan de manejo para el Parque Nacional Natural Serranía de Chiribiquete. (UAESPNN & Fundación Puerto Rastrojo Eds.). Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesNEBEL, G., J. DRAGSTED & A. SALAZAR-VEGA. 2001. Litter fall, biomass and net primary production in floodplain forests in Peruvian Amazon. Forest Ecology Management 150: 93 – 102.spa
dc.relation.referencesNAVARRETE, D. 2002. Descomposición de la hojarasca de cuatro especies de plantas en distintos bosques ubicados en la cuenca de la quebrada Puerto Abeja, Parque Nacional Natural Serranía de Chiribiquete (Caquetá, Colombia). Trabajo de grado, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes. Bogotá, Colombia. 67p.spa
dc.relation.referencesNAVARRETE, D & P. von HILDEBRAND. 2005. Comportamiento fenológico de cuatro bosques heteroespecíficos de la region del Chiribiquete, Amazonia colombiana. Fundación Puerto Rastrojo. Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesNEWSTROM, L. E., G. W. FRANKIE & H. G. BAKER. 1994. A new classification for plant phenology based on flowering patterns in lowland tropical rain forest trees at La Selva, Costa Rica. Biotropica 26(2): 141 – 159spa
dc.relation.referencesOBESO, J. R. 2002. The cost of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist 155(3): 321 – 348.spa
dc.relation.referencesPEÑUELA, M.C. & E. ÁLVAREZ, 2006. Monitoreo de la vegetación en cuatro bosques de suelos contrastantes del trapecio amazónico Colombia. Resultados presentados al IX Congreso Latinoamericano de Botánica, Santo Domingo, R.D.spa
dc.relation.referencesPHILLIPS, J. F. & P. von HILDEBRAND. 2002. Distribución espacial y características de los bosques de la cuenca de Puerto Abeja, Parque Nacional Chiribiquete. En: Plan de manejo para el Parque Nacional Natural Serranía de Chiribiquete. (UAESPNN & Fundación Puerto Rastrojo Eds.). Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesPHILLIPS, O. L. & A. H. GENTRY. 1994. Increasing turnover through time in tropical forest. Science 263: 683 – 714.spa
dc.relation.referencesPHILLIPS, O. L., Y. MALHI, N. HIGUCHI, W. F. LAURANCE, P. NUÑEZ, R. M. VASQUEZ, S. G. LAURANCE, L. V. FERREIRA, M. STERN, S. BROWN & J. GRACE. 1998. Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forest: Evidence from long-term plots. Science 282: 439 – 442.spa
dc.relation.referencesPHILLIPS O. L, P. NÚÑEZ, A. MONTEAGUDO, A. PEÑA, M-E. CHUSPE, W. GALIANO, M. YLI-HALLA and S. ROSE. 2003. Habitat association among Amazonian tree species: a landscape-scale approach. Journal of Ecology 91: 757 – 775.spa
dc.relation.referencesPHILLIPS O. L, R. VASQUEZ, A. MONTEAGUDO, T. BAKER & P. NÚÑEZ. 2005. Large lianas as hyperdynamic elements of the tropical forest canopy. Ecology 86(5): 1250 – 1258.spa
dc.relation.referencesPRANCE, G. T. 1979. Notas sobre la vegetación de la Amazonia III. La terminología de los tipos de bosques Amazónicos sujetos a inundación. Brittonia 31(1): 26 – 38.spa
dc.relation.referencesPROCTOR, J. 1983. Tropical forest litterfall. I. Problems of data comparison. En: S. L. Sutton & T. C. Whitmore (Eds.). Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Pág. 267 – 273.spa
dc.relation.referencesPROCTOR, J. J. M. ANDERSON, P. CHAI, & H. W. VALLACK. 1983. Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu Park. Journal of Ecology 71: 261 – 283.spa
dc.relation.referencesREEKIE, E. G. & F. A. BAZZAZ. 1986. Reproductive effort in plants. 1. Carbon allocation to reproduction. The American Naturalist 129(6): 876 – 896.spa
dc.relation.referencesREICH, P. B. & R. BORCHERT. 1982. Phenology and ecosphysiology of the tropical tree Tabebuia neochrysanthra (Bignoniaceae). Ecology 63: 294 – 299.spa
dc.relation.referencesREICH, P. B. & R. BORCHERT. 1984. Water stress and tree phenology in a tropical dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology: 72: 61 – 74.spa
dc.relation.referencesRICHARDS, P. S. 1952. The tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Inglaterra.spa
dc.relation.referencesRIVERA, G. & R. BORCHERT. 2001. Induction of flowering in tropical trees by a 30-min reduction in photoperiod: evidence from field observations and herbarium collections. Tree Physiology 21: 201 – 212.spa
dc.relation.referencesROY, J., B. SAUGIER & H.A., MOONEY. (2001). Terrestrial Global Productivity. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.spa
dc.relation.referencesRUDAS, A. & A. PRIETO. 2005. Flórula del Párque Nacional Natural Amacayacu, Amazonas, Colombia. C. M. Taylor & R. Ortiz (Eds.). Missouri Botanical Garden Press. St. Louis, Missouri, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesRYAN, M. G., R. M. HUBBARD, S. POGRACIC, R. J. RAISON & R. E. McMURTRIE. 1996. Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue, and stand respiration in Pinus radiatain relation to nitrogen status. Tree Physiology 16: 333 – 343.spa
dc.relation.referencesSCHÖNGART, J., W. J. JUNK, M. T. F. PIEDADE, J. M. AYRES, A. HÜTTERMANN & M. WORBES. 2004. Teleconnection between tree growth in the Amazonian floodplains and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation effect. Global Change Biology 10: 683-692.spa
dc.relation.referencesPARQUE NACIONAL NATURAL AMACAYACU. 2005. Línea base del Parque Nacional Natural Amacayacu. SISTEMA NACIONAL DE PARQUES NACIONALES. Leticiaspa
dc.relation.referencesSOMBROEK, W. G. 2000. Amazon land forms and soils in relation to biological diversity. Acta Amazonica 30: 81 – 100spa
dc.relation.referencesSPAIN, S. V. 1984. Litterfall and standing crop of litter three tropical Australian rain forests. Journal of Ecology 72(3): 947 – 961spa
dc.relation.referencesSTARK, N. 1970. The nutrient content of plants and soils Brazil and Surinam. Biotropica 2: 51 – 60.spa
dc.relation.referencesSWIFT M. J. & J. M. ANDERSON. 1983. Decomposition. En: Leith, H. & Wergwr, M. J. A. 1989. Tropical rain forest ecosystems. Biogeographical and ecological studies. Elsevier, New York. (Series ecosystems of the world, vol. 14b).spa
dc.relation.referencesTer STEEGE, H., B. LAUMANS, D. LAUMANS-BUS, G. ZONDERVAN, & F. BONGERS. 2003. Long-term effect of timber harvesting in north Suriname. Pp. 79-94 in: ter Steege, H. (ed.) Long-term changes in tropical tree diversity: Studies from the Guiana Shield, Africa, Borneo and Melanesia. Tropenbos Series 22. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, The Netherlands.spa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO/CIFCA. 1980. Ecosistemas de los bosques tropicales. Informe sobre el estado de conocimientos preparado por Unesco/PNUMA/FAO.spa
dc.relation.referencesVALENCIA, R., R. B. FOSTER, G. VILLA, R. CONDIT, J-C. SVENNING, C. HERNÁNDEZ, K. ROMOLEROUX, E. LOSOS, E. MAGARD & H. BALSLEV. 2004. Tree species distribution and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. Journal of Ecology 94: 214 – 229.spa
dc.relation.referencesVASCONCELOS, H. L. & F. J. LUIZAO. 2004. Litter production and litter nutrient concentrations in a fragmented Amazonian landscape. Ecological Applications 14(3): 884 – 892.spa
dc.relation.referencesVILLELA, D. M. & J. PROCTOR. 1999. Litterfall mass, chemistry and nutrients retranslocation in a monodominant forest on Maracá Island, Roraima, Brazil. Biotropica 31(2): 198 – 211.spa
dc.relation.referencesVITOUSEK, P. M. & R. L. SANFORD, 1986. Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 137-167spa
dc.relation.referencesVITOUSEK, P. M. 1984. Litterfall, nutrient cycling and nutrient limitation in tropical forest. Ecology 65(1): 285 – 298.spa
dc.relation.referencesWORBES, M. 1999. Annual growth rings, rainfall-dependent growth and long-term growth patterns of tropical trees from Carapo Forest Reserve in Venezuela. Journal of Ecology 87: 391 – 403.spa
dc.relation.referencesWARING, R. H. & W. H. SCHCLESINGER. 1985. Forest ecosystems: concepts and management. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA. WRIGHT, S. J. & O. CALDERÓN. 2006. Seasonal, El Niño and longer term changes in flower and seed production in a moist tropical forest. Ecology Letters 9: 35 – 44.spa
dc.relation.referencesZAR, J. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th. Edition. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.subject.armarcHOJARASCA FORESTAL-BIODEGRADACION
dc.subject.armarcBOSQUES TROPICALES
dc.subject.armarcECOLOGIA DE SELVA LLUVIOSA
dc.subject.ddc550 - Ciencias de la tierra::551 - Geología, hidrología, meteorologíaspa
dc.subject.ddc550 - Ciencias de la tierra::558 - Ciencias de la tierra de América del Surspa
dc.subject.proposalLitterfalleng
dc.subject.proposalAmazoniaeng
dc.subject.proposalcarbon cyclingeng
dc.subject.proposalPNN Chiribiquetespa
dc.subject.proposalPNN Amacayacuspa
dc.subject.proposalStation des Nouragueseng
dc.subject.proposalCampamento El Zafirespa
dc.subject.proposalFORESTAL-BIODEGRADACIONeng
dc.subject.proposalDescomposcición Forestalspa
dc.subject.proposalAmazonasspa
dc.subject.proposalColombiaspa
dc.titleVariación de la caída de la hojarasca fina a través de diferentes tipos de suelos y regiones en la amazonia.spa
dc.title.translatedFine litter fall variation across different soil types and regions in the amazon.eng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
TESIS FINAL NAVARRETE.pdf
Tamaño:
1.4 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de maestría en Estudios Amazónicos
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones (IMANI)