Estimación de la habilidad combinatoria y componentes de la variación genética de los caracteres relacionados con producción y calidad de la vaina en habichuela (Phaseolus vulgaris L)

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorVallejo Cabrera, Franco Alirio
dc.contributor.advisorOrtiz Grisales, Sanín
dc.contributor.authorContreras Rojas, Mayra
dc.contributor.researchgroupMejoramiento Genético, Agronomía y Producción de Semillas de Hortalizasspa
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-24T13:08:26Z
dc.date.available2022-02-24T13:08:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractSe realizó un cruzamiento dialélico entre seis genotipos de habichuela (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) con el objetivo de estimar la habilidad combinatoria y los componentes de varianza. Los genotipos se evaluaron en dos ambientes, utilizando un diseño experimental de bloques completos al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Se analizaron siete características del cultivo. El análisis dialélico se realizó mediante el método 2, modelo 1 de Griffing y Hayman. Los resultados mostraron que la acción genética aditiva fue importante para días a floración (DAF), longitud de la vaina (LDV) y peso promedio de la vaina (PPV), mientras la acción genética no aditiva fue importante para días a cosecha (DAC), número de vainas por planta (NVP), número de semillas por vaina (NSV) y producción por planta (PPP). Las estimaciones de los efectos de Habilidad Combinatoria General (HCG) sugirieron que los progenitores 1 (Blue Lake), 5 (G16806), y 6 (Unapal Milenio) son los más adecuados para usar 'per se' en programas de fitomejoramiento para los caracteres relacionados con rendimiento y calidad de las vainas, mientras que las combinaciones híbridas 1x2, 1x6, 2x6, 4x5, y 5x6, mostraron las mejores estimaciones de Habilidad Combinatoria Especifica (HCE) para los caracteres evaluados, lo que sugiere una alta probabilidad de obtener genotipos superiores. Con la metodología de Hayman el análisis gráfico evidencio la predominancia de efectos genéticos de sobredominancia para los caracteres días a cosecha (DAC) y número de vainas por planta (NVP), mientras que para días a floración (DAF) dominancia incompleta y para longitud de la vaina (LDV) dominancia completa. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractA diallelic cross was made between six bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to estimate combining ability and variance components. The genotypes were evaluated in two environments, using a randomized complete block experimental design with four replications. Seven crop characteristics were analyzed. Diallelic analysis was performed using Griffing's method 2, model 1 and Hayman. Results showed that additive gene action was significant for days to flowering (DAF), pod length (LDV) and mean pod weight (PPV), while non-additive gene action was significant for days to harvest (DAC), number of pods per plant (NVP), number of seeds per pod (NSV) and yield per plant (PPP). Estimates of General Combinatorial Ability (GCA) effects suggested that parents 1 (Blue Lake), 5 (G16806), and 6 (Unapal Milenio) are the most suitable for use 'per se' in breeding programs for yield and pod quality related traits, while the hybrid combinations 1x2, 1x6, 2x6, 4x5, and 5x6, showed the best estimates of Specific Combinatorial Ability (SCA) for the characters evaluated, suggesting a high probability of obtaining superior genotypes. With Hayman's methodology, the graphical analysis showed the predominance of genetic effects of overdominance for the characters days to harvest (DAC) and number of pods per plant (NVP), while for days to flowering (DAF) incomplete dominance and for pod length (LDV) complete dominance.eng
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.description.methodsSe emplearon cuatro líneas de habichuela de la colección mundial de fríjol de la Unidad de Recursos Genéticos del Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (URG-CIAT) previamente seleccionadas por el Programa de Hortalizas de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia- Sede Palmira y los cultivares comerciales Blue Lake (Ferry) y UNAPAL -Milenio de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira. Las metodologías de análisis para un dialélico que se utilizaron son las propuestas por: Hayman y Griffing. Metodología de Hayman “Esta metodología fue diseñada para su uso en cruzamientos dialélicos con líneas homocigotas - plantas autógamas” (Echeverri et al., 1999). Inicialmente se desarrolló para aquella población de estudio en la que se incluyen los progenitores y sus híbridos (modelo genético fijo) (Hayman, 1954), luego fue ampliada para aquellas líneas puras que constituyen una muestra aleatoria (Hayman, 1960). El modelo genético desarrollado por Hayman, se basa en varias hipótesis para su efectividad como son: “Progenitores homocigotos, segregación diploide, ausencia de diferencias entre cruzamientos recíprocos, ausencia de ligamiento, ausencia de alelismo múltiple, ausencia de interacción alélica y distribución independiente de genes” ( Hayman, 1954, 1958) La metodología de Hayman permite analizar los resultados en tres formas básicas, “análisis de varianza a través de la media de los tratamientos; estimación de los componentes y de parámetros genéticos y determinación de las constituciones genéticas relativas de los cultivares, por medio del análisis gráfico” (Hayman, 1958). Metodología de Griffing “Fue desarrollada para valorar la habilidad combinatoria general (HCG) y la habilidad combinatoria específica (HCE), de los progenitores que intervienen en el cruzamiento dialélico” (Espitia et al., 2006). Esta metodología puede variar dependiendo de si los progenitores y/o recíprocos son incluidos, cuatro posibles métodos se presentan, con diferente análisisspa
dc.description.researchareaMejoramiento Genético Vegetalspa
dc.format.extentxii, 76 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81050
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Palmiraspa
dc.publisher.departmentDoctorado en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuariasspa
dc.publisher.placePalmiraspa
dc.publisher.programPalmira - Ciencias Agropecuarias - Doctorado en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.relation.referencesAbou Sen, T. M. (2020). Gene Action and Combining Ability Analysis in some Soybean Quantitative Characters. Journal of Plant Production, 11(7), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2020.110543spa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta-Gallegos, J., Kelly, J., & Gepts, P. (2007). Prebreeding in common bean and use of genetic diversity from wild germplasm. Crop Science, 47(3), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0008IPBSspa
dc.relation.referencesAdams, M. R., Golden, D. L., Chen, H., Register, T. C., & Gugger, E. T. (2006). Nutrition and Disease A Diet Rich in Green and Yellow Vegetables Inhibits Atherosclerosis in Mice. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(7), 1886–1889. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.7.1886spa
dc.relation.referencesAgronet. (2017). Área cosechada, producción y rendimiento de Habichuela. En: http://www.agronet.gov.co/Documents/16-HABICHUELA_2017.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesAgudelo, O., & Montes de Oca, G. (1988). El cultivo de la habichuela. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA)., 76–91spa
dc.relation.referencesAmegbor, I. K., Badu-Apraku, B., & Annor, B. (2017). Combining ability and heterotic patterns of extra-early maturing white maize inbreds with genes from Zea diploperennis under multiple environments. Euphytica, 213(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1823spa
dc.relation.referencesAraújo, L. C. D., Gravina, G. D. A., Marinho, C. D., Almeida, S. N. C. D., Daher, R. F., & Amaral Júnior, A. T. D. (2012). Contribution of components of production on snap bean yield. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 12(3), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332012000300007spa
dc.relation.referencesArumuganathan, K., & Earle, E. D. (1991). Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 9(3), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02672069spa
dc.relation.referencesArunga, E. E., & Van Rheenen, H. A., Owuoche, J. O. (2010). Diallel analysis of Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties for important traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(15), 1951–1957. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/164spa
dc.relation.referencesAsociación Hortifrutícola de Colombia, A. (2018). ASOHOFRUCOL. Balance del sector hortifrutícola en 2018. Bogotá, Colombia. Recuperado de http://www.asohofrucol.com.co/imagenes/BALANCE_DEL_SECTOR_HORTIFRUTICULTURA_2018.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtnaf, M., Tesfaye, K., Dagne, K., & Mohammed, H. (2014). Hyman’s diallel analysis to study genetic parameters of phenological traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Int J Agric Sci Nat Resour, 1(4), 65–71.spa
dc.relation.referencesAyo-Vaughan, M. A., Ariyo, O. J., & Alake, C. O. (2013). Combining ability and genetic components for pod and seed traits in cowpea lines. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 8:e10, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2013.e10spa
dc.relation.referencesBarelli, M. A. A., Vidigal, M. C. G., do Amaral Júnior, A. T., Vidigal Filho, P. S., & Silvério, L. (1999). Genetic control on number of days to flowering and yield components in common bean (Phaseol vulgaris L.). Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 21, 423–427. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v21i0.4252spa
dc.relation.referencesBecerra-Velásquez, V., & Gepts, P. (1994). RFLP diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in its centres of origin. Genome, 37(2), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1139/g94-036spa
dc.relation.referencesBennett, M. D., & Leitch, I. J. (2011). Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: Targets, trends and tomorrow. Annals of Botany, 107(3), 467–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq258spa
dc.relation.referencesBlair, M. W., Chaves, A., Tofiño, A., Calderón, J. F., & Palacio, J. D. (2010). Extensive diversity and inter-genepool introgression in a world-wide collection of indeterminate snap bean accessions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120(7), 1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1262-4spa
dc.relation.referencesCampos, R., Flor, C. A., Ospina, H. F., & Temple, S. R. (1977). Cruzamiento del fríjol [conjunto audiotutorial].spa
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, F. S. D., Paredes, Durán, M., Moreno Pérez, E. D. C., & Magdaleno Villar, J. J. (2017). Variedades y densidades de población de frijol ejotero cultivado bajo invernadero e hidroponía. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 8(5), 1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v8i5.117spa
dc.relation.referencesCorporación Colombiana Internacional, C. (2010). Análisis internacional del sector Hortofrutícola para Colombia. 1a ed. Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrumpacker, D. W., & Allard, R. W. (1962). A Diallel cross analysis of heading date in wheat. Hilgardia, 32(6), 275–319. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v32n06p275. April 1962.spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz, C. D. (2020). Programa GENES. Aplicativo Computacional em Genética e Estatística. Disponible desde Internet en: www.ufv.br/dbg/genes/genes.htm (con acceso 05/02/2021). Universidade Federal de Viçosa.spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz, C. D., Regazzi, A. J., & Carneiro, P. C. S. (2004). Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 3a ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV. p.688.spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz, C. D., Regazzi, A. J., & Carneiro, P. C. S. (2012). Modelos Biométricos Aplicados ao Melhoramento Genético.4a ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV. p.514.spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz, D. P., Gravina, G. A., Oliveira, T. R. A., Gomes, A. B. S., Silva, C. Q., Vivas, M., & Silva, V. B. (2018). Selection of progenies of snap beans using mixed models (REML/BLUP). Genetics and Molecular Research, 17(2)spa
dc.relation.referencesCurrence, T. M. (1930). Inheritance studies in Phaseolus vulgaris. Tech Bull Minnesota Agric Exp Stn, 68, 3–28.spa
dc.relation.referencesDa Silva, V. P., Barelli, M. A. A., Felipin-Azevedo, R., Poletine, J. P., & Bernini, C. S. (2020). Agronomic Performance and Heterosis in Common Bean Genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 8(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v8i4.17329spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2016). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Tercer Censo Nacional Agropecuario. Recuperado de https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/agropecuario/censo-nacional-agropecuario-2014#10.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Carvalho, A. C. P. P., Leal, N. R., Rodrigues, R., & Costa, F. A. (1999). Capacidade de combinação para oito caracteres agronômicos em cultivares de feijão-de-vagem de crescimento determinado. Horticultura Brasileira, 17(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05361999000200005spa
dc.relation.referencesDelgado-Salinas, A. O. (1985). Systematics of the Genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae) in North and Central America. University of Texas Austin.spa
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, A. G., & Jinks, J. L. (1956). A Generalised Analysis of Diallel Crosses. Genetics, 41(1), 65.spa
dc.relation.referencesDickson, M. H. (1967). Diallel Analysis of Seven Economic Characters in Snap Beans. Crop Science, 7(2), 121-124.spa
dc.relation.referencesdos Santos Trindade, R., do Amaral Júnior, A. T., Rodrigues, R., Viana, J. M. S., & Pereira, M. G. (2011). Combining ability for morphoagronomic traits in common bean and snap bean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(29), 6240–6245. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.1585spa
dc.relation.referencesDrijfhout, E. (1978). Inheritance of temperature-dependent string formation in common bean. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop, 21, 33–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrijfhout, E. . (1970). Influence of temperature on string formation of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Euphytica, 19, 145–151.spa
dc.relation.referencesEberhart, S. A., & Gardner, C. O. (1966). A General Model for Genetic Effects. Biometrics, 22(4), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528079spa
dc.relation.referencesEcheverri, A., Ceballos, H., & Vallejo Cabrera, F. A. (1999). Análisis dialélico de algunos caracteres cuantitativos en pimentón (Capsicum annuum L.). Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, 52(2), 611–642.spa
dc.relation.referencesEmerson, R. A. (1904). Heredity in bean hybrids. Ann Rep Nebr Agric Exp St, 17, 33-78.spa
dc.relation.referencesENA. (2019). DANE, Encuesta nacional agropecuaria (ENA) – Históricos [En línea], Recuperado de: https://www.https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/enda/ena/2019/boletin_ena_2019.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesErtiro, B. T., Zeleke, H., Friesen, D., Blummel, M., & Twumasi, A. S. (2013). Relationship between the performance of parental inbred lines and hybrids for food-feed traits in maize (Zea mays L.) in Ethiopia. Field Crops Research, 153, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.008spa
dc.relation.referencesEspitia, M. M., Vallejo, F. A., & Baena, D. (2006). Efectos Heteróticos y Habilidad Combinatoria para el rendimiento por planta en Cucurbita moschata DUCH. Ex Poir. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 59(1), 3105–3121. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0304-28472006000100004&lng=en&tlng=esspa
dc.relation.referencesFalconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). Pearson. Harlow, England.spa
dc.relation.referencesFasahat, P., Rajabi, A., Rad, J., & Derera, J. (2016). Principles and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biometrics Biostatistics International Journal, 4(1), 1–24.spa
dc.relation.referencesFilgueira, F. A. R. (2013). Parte II-Olericultura especial. Novo manual de olericultura: agrotecnologia moderna na produção e comercialização de hortaliças (Filgueira FAR, ed.). 3rd edn. UFV, Viçosa.spa
dc.relation.referencesFont Quer, P. (2001). Diccionario de Botánica. 2nda ed. Ediciones Península s.a. Barcelona, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrancelino, F. M., de Amaral Gravina, G. Manhães, C. M., Cardoso, P. M., & de Araújo, L. C. (2011). Evaluation of Promising of snap bean to the North and Northwest Fluminense. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 42(2), 554–562.spa
dc.relation.referencesFranco, M. C., Cassini, S. T., Oliveira, V. R., Vieira, C., & Tsai, S. M. (2001). Combining ability for nodulation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes from Andean and Middle American gene pools. Euphytica, 118(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017560118666spa
dc.relation.referencesFreytag, G. F., & Debouck, D. G. (2002). Taxonomy, Distribution, and Ecology of the Genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionodeae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. Taxonomía, distribución y ecología del género Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionodeae) en Norteamérica, México y Centroaméric. In U. Editorial Forth Worth, TX, Botanical Research Institute of Texas (Ed.), Botanical Miscellany (p. 298). SIDA, Botanical Miscellany.spa
dc.relation.referencesGao, Y., & Wang, H. (2007). Inositol pentakisphosphate mediates Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282(36), 26490–26502. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702106200spa
dc.relation.referencesGardner, C., & Eberhart, S. (1966). Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics, 439–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528181spa
dc.relation.referencesGentry, H. S. (1969). Origin of the common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris. Springer, 23(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862972spa
dc.relation.referencesGepts, P. (1998). Origin and evolution of common bean: past events and recent trends. HortScience, 33(7), 1124–1130.spa
dc.relation.referencesGepts, P., & Bliss, F. A. (1986). Phaseolin variability among wild and cultivated common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Colombia. Economic Botany, 40(4), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859660spa
dc.relation.referencesGepts, P., & Bliss, F. A. (1988). Dissemination pathways of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. II. Europe and Africa. Econ. Bot, 42(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859038spa
dc.relation.referencesGepts, P., Osborn, T. C., Rashka, K., & Bliss, F. A. (1986). Phaseolin-protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Economic Botany, 40(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859659spa
dc.relation.referencesGeraldi, I. O., & De Miranda-Filho, J. B. (1988). Adapted models for the analysis of combining ability of varieties in partial diallel crosses. Revista Brasileira de Genética, 11(2), 419–430.spa
dc.relation.referencesGetachew, E. A., & Tesfaye, A. (2015). Impact ofsowing date and plant spacing on yield, qualityand disease incidence of snap bean(Phaseolus vulgaris l.) varieties at Jimma Southwestern, Ethiopia. Global AdvancedRes. J. Educational Res. and Review, 4(5), 81–89.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilbert, N. E. G. (1958). Diallel cross in plant breeding. Nature.Com, 12(4), 477. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1958.48spa
dc.relation.referencesGomes, A. B. S., Oliveira, T. R. A., Gravina, G. A., Cruz, D. P., Sant’Anna, C. Q. S. S. Daher, R. F., Araújo, L. C., Araújo, K. C., Oliveira, G. H. F., Rocha, R. S., & Pereira, I. M. (2019). Combining ability in snap bean lines in Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr18214spa
dc.relation.referencesGomes, G. R., Furlan, F. F., Freiria, G. H., Gonçalves, L. S. A., & Takahashi, L. S. A. (2017). Production components and yield of bushing snap bean in conventional and organic production systems. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 38(5), 3353-3361. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n5p3353spa
dc.relation.referencesGriffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(4), 463–493. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463spa
dc.relation.referencesHallauer, A. R., & Miranda, F. (1988). Quantitative genetics maize breeding (2nd ed.). Iowa State Univ. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086974spa
dc.relation.referencesHamad, I. (1975). Inheritance of Yield, Yield Components, Number of Days to Flowering, Plant Height and Incidence of Interlocular Cavitation of Pods in Snap Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin--Madison.spa
dc.relation.referencesHayat, I., Ahmad, A., Masud, T., Ahmed, A., & Bashir, S. (2014). Nutritional and health perspectives of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): an overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 54(5), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.596639spa
dc.relation.referencesHayman, B. I. (1954). The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics, 10(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001877spa
dc.relation.referencesHayman, B. I. (1958). The Theory and analysis of diallel crosses. II. Genetics, 43(1), 63–85.spa
dc.relation.referencesHayman, B. I. (1960). The theory and analysis of diallel crosses III. Genetics, 45, 155–172. IBPGR. (2001). (IPGRI) Descritores para Phaseolus vulgaris. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Rome.spa
dc.relation.referencesICONTEC. (2001). Instituto Colombiano de Normas Tecnicas y Certificación. NTC 1253. Habichuela. Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesJanssen, W. (1987). El cultivo de la habichuela en varios paises de America Latina. Memorias de Un Taller, CIAT, Cali, Colombia, 11 Al 15 de Mayo de 1987.spa
dc.relation.referencesJhanavi, D. R., Patil, H. B., Justin, P., Hadimani, R. H., Mulla, S. W. R., & Sarvamangala, C. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance studies in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Indian J. Agric. Res, 52(2), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-4923spa
dc.relation.referencesJinks, J. L., & Hayman, B. . (1953). The analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 27, 48–54.spa
dc.relation.referencesJoosten, J. H. . (1927). Een onderzoek naar het kenmerk der “draadloosheid” bij verschillende boonenrassen [Investigations concerning the “stringlessness” of varieties of beans]. Mededelingen van de Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, 31, 1–49.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, L. (1981). What is the origin of the common bean? Springer, 35(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858692spa
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, L., & Kaplan, L. N. (1988). Phaseolus in Archaeology. In Gepts, P. (ed) Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans (pp. 125–142). Kluwer Academic. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2786-5spa
dc.relation.referencesKempthorne, O. (1955). The theory of the diallel cross. Genetics, 41, 451–459.spa
dc.relation.referencesKolonel, L. N., Hankin, J. H., Whittemore, A. S., Wu, A. H., Gallagher, R. P., Wilkens, L. R., John, E. M., Howe, G. R., Dreon, D. M., & West, D. W. (2000). Vegetables, fruits, legumes and prostate cancer: a multiethnic case-control study. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers, 9(8), 795–804.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrause, W., Rodrigues, R., & Leal, N. R. (2012). Capacidade combinatória para características agronômicas em feijão-de-vagem. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 43(3), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902012000300015spa
dc.relation.referencesLamz-Piedra, A., Cárdenas-Travieso, R. ., Ortiz-Pérez, R., Eladio-Alfonzo, L., & Sandrino-Himely, A. (2017). Evaluación preliminar de líneas de frijol común (Phaselus vulgaris L.) promisorios para siembras tempranas en Melena del Sur. Cultivos Tropicales, 38(4), 111–118. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0258-59362017000400016&lng=es&tlng=esspa
dc.relation.referencesLeal, N. R., Hamad, I. A., & Bliss, F. A. (1982). Avaliação de progenitores e linhas avançadas de melhoramento de feijão-de-vagem de crescimento determinado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 17,(2), 225–231.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeite, P. H. M. P., Barelli, M. A. A., Neves, L. G., da Silva, C. R., & de Oliveira, T. C. (2015). Genetic divergence among common bean cultivars from precocious group. Científica, 43(2), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2015v43n2p143-148spa
dc.relation.referencesLeite, P. H. M. P., da Silva, V. P., Gilio, T. A. S., Azevedo, R. F., de Oliveira, T. C., & Barelli, M. A. A. (2019). Diversidade genética em cultivares e linhagens de feijão comum (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) utilizando análises multivariadas. Revista Cultura Agronômica, 28(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.32929/2446-8355.2019v28n3p268-279spa
dc.relation.referencesLinnaeus, C. (1753). Species Plantarum, exhibitentes plantas rita cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis nominibus triviabilibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum Systema Sexuala digestas.In 2 volumes. Tomus I, pp. [xi], 1–560, Tomus II, pp. 561.spa
dc.relation.referencesLizarralde, R. . (2013). Dirección de cadenas productivas. Cadena Agroalimentaria de Las Hortalizas. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Hortalizas/Documentos/2013-11-30 Cifras Sectoriales.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMachado, A. T. (2014). Construção histórica do melhoramento genético de plantas: do convencional ao participativo. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia, 9(1), 35–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesMárquez, S. F. (1988). Genotecnia vegetal. Tomo II. Editor AGT. México. 563.spa
dc.relation.referencesMashiqa, P., Moatshe, O., Tiroesele, B., Lekgari, L., & Molosiwa, O. (2019). Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to varying planting dates in Botswana. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, 7(2), 26–30.spa
dc.relation.referencesMather, K., & Jinks, J. I. (1971). Biometrical Genetics. (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.19730150511spa
dc.relation.referencesMcIntosh, M. S. (1983). Analysis of Combined Experiments. Agronomy Journal, 75(1), 153–155.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2017). Anuario estadististico del sector agropecuario y pesquero. Recuperado el 12 de 02 de 2020, de. https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/reportes/EVA/story_content/external_files_/ANUARIO 2017.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMounir, A. M., El-Yazid, A. A., Orabi, I. O. A., Zahran, A. A., & El-Oksh, I. I. (2015). Effect of sowing date, gamma irradiation and intracultivar differences on growth, pod characteristics and some endogenous plant growth regulators in snap Beans. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(6), 380–390.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, J. ., & Baggett, J. . (1999). Improvement of snap bean. In Common bean improvement in the twenty-first century (pp. 289–329). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, J. ., & Kmiecik, K. (2017). Common Bean: Economic Importance and Relevance to Biological Science Research. In: Pérez de la Vega M., Santalla M., Marsolais F. (eds) The Common Bean Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63526-2_1spa
dc.relation.referencesNienhuis, J., & Singh, S. P. (1986). Combining Ability Analyses and Relationships Among Yield, Yield Components, and Architectural Traits in Dry Bean. Crop Science, 26(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600010005xspa
dc.relation.referencesOwusu, E. Y., Amegbor, I. K., Darkwa, K., Oteng-Frimpong, R., & Sie, E. K. (2018). Gene action and combining ability studies for grain yield and its related traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Cogent Food & Agriculture, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1519973spa
dc.relation.referencesOwusu, E. Y., Mohammed, H., Manigben, K. A., Adjebeng-Danquah, J., Kusi, F., Karikari, B., & Sie, E. K. (2020). Diallel Analysis and Heritability of Grain Yield, Yield Components, and Maturity Traits in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). The Scientific World Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9390287spa
dc.relation.referencesPandey, B., & Singh, Y. V. (2010). Combining ability for yield over environment in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Legume Research, 33(3), 190–195.spa
dc.relation.referencesPimentel-Gomes, F. (2009). Curso de estatística experimental. 12a. ed., Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz. 451 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrakken, R. (1934). Inheritance of colours and pod characters in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica, 16, 177–296.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamalho, M. A. P., Santos, J. B., & Pinto, C. A. B. P. (2008). Genética na Agropecuária. Editora UFLA. In Lavras.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, L. (2006). Mejora de plantas alógamas. Universidad Pública de Navarra. Pamplona–España,.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaut, D. M., Tamnar, A. B., Burungale, S. V., & Badhe, P. L. (2017). Half diallel analysis in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(7), 1807–1819. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.218spa
dc.relation.referencesRocha, F. D., Stinghen, J. C., Gemeli, M. S., Coimbra, J. L. M., & Guidolin, A. F. (2014). Diallel analysis as a tool when selecting parents for beans. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 45(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902014000100010spa
dc.relation.referencesRodrigues, R., Leal, N. R., & Pereira, M. G. (1998). Análise dialélica de seis características agronômicas em Phaseolus vulgaris L. Bragantia, Campinas, 57(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051998000200005spa
dc.relation.referencesRojas, B. A., & Sprague, G. F. (1952). A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials III. General and specific combining ability and their interactions with locations and years. Agronomy Journal, 44(9), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400090002xspa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz, C. M. (2012). Obtención de un híbrido de frijol arbustivo para una cosecha mecanizada. Tecnología En Marcha, 25(2), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v25i2.311spa
dc.relation.referencesSantalla, M., Rodiño, A., & De Ron, A. (2002). Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for common bean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104(6–7), 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-001-0844-6spa
dc.relation.referencesServicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de semillas. (2017). Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de semillas. Guía Técnica para la Descripción Varietal de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).spa
dc.relation.referencesSheikh, F. A., Sofi, P. A., Wani, S. H., Khan, M. N., Dar, Z. A., & Lone, J. A. (2016). Stability analysis in bush type Rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) under temperate Kashmir conditions. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 9(5), 745. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2016.00097.8spa
dc.relation.referencesSilbernagel, M. J. (1986). Snap Bean Breeding. In Breeding Vegetable Crops (J. Bassett, pp. 243–292).spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva, M. P. da, Amaral Júnior, A. T. do, Rodrigues, R., Pereira, M. G., & Viana, A. P. (2004). Genetic control on morphoagzronomic traits in snap bean. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 47(6), 855–862. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132004000600004spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, A., & Saini, S. (1982). A note on combining ability in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science, 11(3–4), 270–273.spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, B. K., & Singh, B. (2015). Breeding perspectives of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Vegetable Science, 42(1), 1–17.spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, I., Badaya, S. N., & Tikka, S. B. S. (2006). Combining ability for yield over environments in cowpea. Indian Journal of Crop Science, 1(1–2), 205–206.spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, S. P., Gepts, P., & Debouck, D. G. (1991). Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic Botany, 45(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887079spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, S. P., & Voysest, O. (1997). Ampliación de la base genetica de los cultivares de frijol: hibridación interespecífica en Phaseolus especies. In Taller de Mejoramiento de Frijol para el siglo XXI. Bases para una Estrategia para América Latina (p. 559).spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh S. (2001). Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars. Crop Science, 41(6), 1659–1675. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.1659spa
dc.relation.referencesSprague, G. F., & Tatum, L. A. (1942). General vs. Specific Combining Ability in Single Crosses of Corn. Agronomy Journal, 34(10), 923–932. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400100008xspa
dc.relation.referencesSprague, G. S., & Tatum, I. . (1942). General vs. Specific combining ability in single crosess of corn. J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 34, 923–932.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaha, N. M. (2019). Genotype× environment interaction and stability analysis for some economic characters in snap bean. Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(2), 1541-1558. https://doi.org/10.21608/AJS.2019.11880.1016spa
dc.relation.referencesTohme, J., Gonzalez, D. O., Beebe, S., & Duque, M. C. (1996). AFLP analysis of gene pools of a wild bean core collection. Crop Sci., 36(5), 1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050048xspa
dc.relation.referencesTschermak, E. V. (1916). Über den gegenwärtigen Stand der Gemüsezüchtung. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenzüchtung, 4, 65–104.spa
dc.relation.referencesTuba Bıçer, B. T., & Şakar, D. (2008). Heritability and gene effects for yield and yield components in chickpea. Hereditas, 145(5), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2008.02061.xspa
dc.relation.referencesUddin, F. J., Kashem, M. A., Islam, A. M., & Sarkar, M. A. R. (2017). Optimizing sowing date for French bean varieties under Bangladesh condition. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 21(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2017/38096spa
dc.relation.referencesUSDA. (2019). Disponibilidad y consumo de alimentos del USDA. [(consultado el 12 de julio de 2019)];Disponible en línea: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/food-availability-and-consumption/spa
dc.relation.referencesVale, N. M. D., Barili, L. D., Oliveira, H. M. D., Carneiro, J. E. D. Carneiro, P. C. S., & Silva, F. L. D. (2015). Escolha de genitores quanto à precocidade e produtividade de feijão tipo carioca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 50(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2015000200006spa
dc.relation.referencesVallejo, F. ., & Estrada, E. . (2016). Mejoramiento genético de plantas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (Segunda ed).spa
dc.relation.referencesVallejo, F. A., Espitia, M., Estrada, E., & Ramirez, H. (2010). Genética vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira, Colombia. 383.spa
dc.relation.referencesVallejo, F. A., & Estrada, E. I. (2004). Producción de hortalizas de clima cálido. Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira.spa
dc.relation.referencesVallejo, F. A., Gutierrez, A., Estrada, E. I., Cardozo, C. I., García, M. A., Sánchez, M. S., & Baena, D. (2004). Cultivo de habichuela: variedad UNAPAL milenio. Editorial UN. http://www.uneditorial.net/uflip/Cultivo-de-habichuela-variedad-UNAPAL-milenio/pubData/source/Cultivo-de-habichuela-variedad-UNAPAL-milenio.PDFspa
dc.relation.referencesVaz, D. D. C., Morais-Júnior, O. P. D., & Peixoto, N. (2017). Agro-morphological characterization and genetic divergence assessment in bush snap bean genotypes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 47(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632016v4743525spa
dc.relation.referencesViana, J. M. S., Cruz, C. D., & Cardoso, A. A. (1999). Theory and analysis of partial diallel crosses. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22(4), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47571999000400021spa
dc.relation.referencesVidyakar, V., Lal, G. M., Singh, M. K., & Kumar, A. (2017). Study on genetic diversity in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, New Delhi, 6(6), 184–187.spa
dc.relation.referencesWade, B. L. (1937). Breeding and improvement of peas and beans. In United States Department of Agriculture: Yearbook of Agriculture (pp. 251–282).spa
dc.relation.referencesWhankate, R.A.; Garande, V.K.; Shinde, U.S.; Dhumal, S.S.; Sonawane, P.N.; SARVADE, S.A.; Ambad, S.N. (2021). Growth and Yield Performance of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germplasm under Sub-Montane Zone of Maharashtra. Legume Research: An International Journal, 44(2): 138–144. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4249spa
dc.relation.referencesWellensiek, S. J. (1922). De erfelikheid van het al of niet bezit van “draad” bij rassen van Phaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica, 4, 443–446.spa
dc.relation.referencesYordanov, M. (1983). Heterosis in the Tomato (pp. 189–219). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81977-3_7spa
dc.relation.referencesZdravković, M., Zdravković, J., Stanković, L., Pavlović, N., Zdravković, J., Stanković, L., & Pavlović, N. (2005). Combining abilities of inheriting first pod height of some french bean lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Genetika, 37(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR0501065Zspa
dc.relation.referencesZeffa, D. M., Perini, L. J., Constantino, L. V., Freiria, G. H., & Gonçalves, L. S. A. (2020). A New Classification proposal of coefficients of variation for morpho-agronomic traits in Snap Beans. Functional Plant Breeding Journal, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.35418/2526-4117/v2n2a3spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.subject.agrovocAnálisis dialelo
dc.subject.agrovocdiallel analysis
dc.subject.ddc630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::635 - Cultivos hortícolas (Horticultura)spa
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biología::576 - Genética y evoluciónspa
dc.subject.proposalDialelospa
dc.subject.proposalHaymaneng
dc.subject.proposalGriffingeng
dc.subject.proposalhabilidad combinatoriaspa
dc.subject.proposalhibridaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalPhaseolus vulgaris Leng
dc.subject.proposaldialelluseng
dc.subject.proposalcombining abilityeng
dc.subject.proposalhybridizationeng
dc.titleEstimación de la habilidad combinatoria y componentes de la variación genética de los caracteres relacionados con producción y calidad de la vaina en habichuela (Phaseolus vulgaris L)spa
dc.title.translatedEstimation of the combining ability and components of the genetic variation of the traits related to production and quality of the pod in snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L)eng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
60393612.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
1.7 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias