Adopción de tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en proyectos de gobierno electrónico colombianos: Factores habilitantes e inhibidores

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorSánchez Torres, Jenny Marcela
dc.contributor.advisorCardona Román, Diana Marcela
dc.contributor.authorBorja Acosta, Joshep Stevens
dc.contributor.researchgroupGriego (Grupo Investigación en Gestión y Organizaciones)spa
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-31T20:45:45Z
dc.date.available2022-08-31T20:45:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-29
dc.descriptionilustraciones, graficasspa
dc.description.abstractEn esta tesis de investigación se identificó un problema que apunta a la dificultad de la toma de decisiones claras y con sustento para la adopción de TIC en proyectos de gobierno electrónico, por lo que el propósito de esta investigación se enfoca en proponer un grupo de factores habilitantes e inhibidores que puedan apoyar la adopción de TIC en proyectos de gobierno electrónico en Colombia. Para identificarlos y proponerlos, se utilizó una metodología de tipo secuencial mixta exploratoria compuesta por tres fases 1. Revision de literatura; 2. Validación con usuarios; 3. Validación con expertos. Dando como resultados en cada fase: Primero, luego de una revisión sistemática de literatura 32 factores habilitantes y 29 factores inhibidores para la adopción de TIC en proyectos de gobierno electrónico. Segundo, se examinó la presencia de estos factores, desde el punto de vista de las necesidades y requisitos de usuarios en un proyecto de gobierno electrónico colombiano. Tercero, se verificó la correcta definición, la pertinencia y el impacto de los factores para la adopción de TIC; apoyado en el juicio de expertos en un proyecto de gobierno electrónico colombiano. Como principal conclusión, se tiene que los factores identificados permiten realizar un análisis pertinente para adoptar tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones (TIC) en proyectos de gobierno electrónico. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractIn this research thesis, a problem was identified, which leads to the difficulty of making clear and supported decisions to adopt ICT in electronic government projects. This research focuses on proposing a group of factors that enable or inhibit decision-making in electronic government projects in Colombia. An exploratory mixed sequential methodology was used to identify and propose these factors, the methodology include three phases: 1) Literature Review, 2) Users validation, and 3) Experts validation. Giving the following results in each phase: First, after a systematic literature review, 32 enabling factors and 29 inhibiting factors were found to adopt ICT in electronic government projects. Second, these factors were examined throughout the needs and requirements of users in a Colombian electronic government project. Third, supported by expert judgment in a Colombian electronic government project, the definition, relevance, and impact of these factors for ICT adoption were verified. The main conclusion suggests that the identified factors allow a pertinent analysis to be carried out to adopt information and communication technologies (ICT) in electronic government projects.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrialspa
dc.description.methodsMetodología de tipo secuencial mixta exploratoria compuesta por tres fases: 1. Revisión de literatura; 2. Validación con usuarios; 3. Validación con expertos.spa
dc.description.researchareaGestión de la innovaciónspa
dc.format.extentxv, 112 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82228
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrialspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríaspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrialspa
dc.relation.indexedRedColspa
dc.relation.indexedLaReferenciaspa
dc.relation.referencesD. Comin and B. Hobijn, “An Exploration of Technology Diffusion,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 100, no. 1997, pp. 2031–2059, 2008, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1116606.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Sieber and J. Valor, “Criterios de adopción de las tecnologías de información y comunicación,” PricewaterhouseCoopers IESE, p. 58, 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. C. de Guzman and M. A. Jones, “E-Policing: Environmental and organizational correlates of website features and characteristics among large police departments in the united states of america,” Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 64–82, 2012, doi: 10.4018/jegr.2012010103.spa
dc.relation.referencesG. Puron-cid, G. Puron-cid, D. Carolina, and V. Tello, “Inter-temporal analysis of e-government enactment : the cases of Mexico and Colombia Inter-temporal Analysis of e-Government Enactment : The cases of Mexico and Colombia,” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Theory Pract. Electron. Gov., no. January, pp. 28–31, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2591888.2591893.spa
dc.relation.referencesPresidencia de la República de Colombia, “Decreto 2710 de 2014.” 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesPresidencia de la República de Colombia, “Decreto 2236 de 2017,” 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. P. González-Zabala, J. M. Sánchez-Torres, and J. A. Holbrook, “Análisis de los indicadores para medir las iniciativas de Sociedad de la Información propuestas por el,” Univ. Humanística, vol. 76, pp. 277–298, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. E. Padilla-Beltrán, P. L. Vega-Rojas, and D. A. Rincón-Caballero, “Tendencias y dificultades para el uso de las TIC en educaciòn superior. (Spanish),” Tendencies Difficulties Assoc. with use ICTs High. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 272–295, 2014, doi: ISSN: 1900-3803.spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Vega Perez and L. A. Reyez Cañas, “Impacto del uso de las tecnologìas de la información y las comunicaciones en la gestiòn judicial de la dirección seccional de administración judicial de Cúcuta,” 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuperintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios, “Informe auditoria interna de gestion proceso tecnologias de informacion sui.” 2016.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. S. Borja-Acosta and J. M. Sánchez-Torres, “A methodology to explore key factors and barriers affecting adoption of ICTs in e-government,” Proc. 17th Eur. Conf. Digit. Governmen, pp. 351–355, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Sánchez-torres, M. P. González-zabala, and M. P. Sánchez-Muñoz, “La Sociedad de la Información : Génesis , Iniciativas , Concepto y su Relación con Las Tic Information Society : Genesis , Initiatives , Concept and its Relation to ICT,” Rev. la Fac. Ing. Fis. la UIS, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Sánchez-Torres, “‘La Paradoja del Dr. Jekyll y Mr. Hyde en la Sociedad de la Información,’” 2015, vol. 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. M. Sánchez-Torres, “Propuesta metodológica para evaluar políticas públicas de promoción del e-goverment como campo de aplicación de la sociedad de la información. Conceptualización y aplicación empírica en el caso colombiano,” Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2005.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Hilbert, “Toward a Conceptual Framework for ICT for Development: Lessons Learned from the Cube Framework Used in Latin America (English),” Inf. Technol. Int. Dev., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 243–259, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Parasuraman and D. Grewal, “Determining the impact of service quality on citizens’ satisfaction and the role of citizens’ demographics. The case of the Greek citizen’s service centers,” TQM J., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 168–174, 2020, doi: 10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0274.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Barron and D. Schneckenberg, “A theoretical framework for exploring the influence of national culture on Web 2 . 0 adoption in corporate contexts,” Corp. Context. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 176–186, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesI. Sahin, F. Rogers, F. Rogers, and F. Rogers, “Detailed review of Rogers ’ Diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 14–23, 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Ochoa, “innovaciones en procesos al interior de organizaciones proveedoras de contenidos en línea,” 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Williams and H. Dickinson, “Can knowledge management enhance technology adoption in healthcare? A review of the literature,” Evid. Policy A J. Res. Debate Pract., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 309–331, 2010, doi: 10.1332/174426410X524811.spa
dc.relation.referencesE. J. Rodríguez Martínez and J. M. Sanchez Torres, “Evaluación del grado de apropiación de herramientas Web 2.0 en los estudiantes de educación media en Colombia, a través de un sistema de indicadores multidimensional,” 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Sharma, “Assessing e-government implementations,” Electron. Gov. An Int. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 198–212, 2004.spa
dc.relation.referencesT. P. N. Kalusopa, “Developing an e-records readiness framework for labor organizations in Botswana,” Inf. Dev., vol. 21, no. 4494, pp. 199–215, 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Ziemba, “Examining Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Information Society - Lessons Learned from Poland,” ECIS, pp. 0–15, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesB. Pudjianto and H. Zo, “Next generation of e-Government for developing countries: Lessons learned from the cases of the EU and Korea,” Proc. - 3rd Int. Conf. Converg. Hybrid Inf. Technol. ICCIT 2008, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 985–991, 2008, doi: 10.1109/ICCIT.2008.395.spa
dc.relation.referencesZ. Andreopoulou, “Adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) in public Forest service in Greece,” J. Environ. Prot. Ecol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1194–1204, 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE, OECD Guide to Measuring the Information Society 2011. 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesB. Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, D. Budgen, M. Turner, J. Bailey, and S. Linkman, “Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. O’Neill, A. Kealy, and L. Stapleton, Gestalt - New technology old cultures a review of the adoption of the telemedicine centre in Kosovo, vol. 15, no. PART 1. IFAC, 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. E. Strategy and B. Ngwenya, “Decision Support Systems: An E-Government Strategy to Enhance Human Resources Output in Public Sector Organisations,” Decis. Support Syst., pp. 1–22, 2013, doi: 10.1002/9781118785317.weom070211.spa
dc.relation.referencesL.-H. Cheng, C.-T. Wen, E. Y. Li, and T.-Y. Lin, “Service innovation activities in e-government initiatives: The Taiwan experience,” Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–71, 2012, doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2012.048025.spa
dc.relation.referencesC. Löffler and M. Hettich, Introducing Mobile Services to Developing Countries - A South African Perspective. 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Maldonado, “The Process of Introducing FLOSS in the Public Administration : The Case of Venezuela The Process of Introducing FLOSS in the Public Administration : The Case of Venezuela,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. XX, no. 11, pp. 756–783, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Rawas, “Towards a better understanding of e-Government implementation,” Eng. Syst. Manag. Its Appl. (ICESMA), 2010 Second Int. Conf., pp. 1–6, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Beldad, M. De Jong, and M. Steehouder, “How shall i trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 857–869, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.013.spa
dc.relation.referencesE. Ziaeipour, A. Taghizade, F. Bazazan, F. Khoshalhan, and A. Mohamadian, “A model for national e-readiness assessment based on system approach,” ITNG 2009 - 6th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. New Gener., pp. 993–998, 2009, doi: 10.1109/ITNG.2009.206.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Choudrie and A. Papazafeiropoulou, “Lessons learnt from the broadband diffusion in South Korea and the UK: implications for future government intervention in technology diffusion,” Electron. Gov. An Int. J., vol. 3, no. 0, pp. 373–385, 2010, doi: 10.1504/EG.2006.010800.spa
dc.relation.referencesV. Hughes and P. E. D. Love, “Toward cyber‐centric management of policing: back to the future with information and communication technology,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 604–612, 2004, doi: 10.1108/02635570410550269.spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Ang and N. Binti, “E-Readiness for Industrialised Building System ( IBS ) Components Management: Exploratory Study In Malaysian,” Int. Conf. Innov. Manag. Technol. Res. IEEE, no. May, pp. 21–22, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesN. Mnjama and J. Wamukoya, “E-government and records management: an assessment tool for e-records readiness in government,” Electron. Libr., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 274–284, 2007, doi: 10.1108/02640470710754797.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. R. Rodríguez, “The ‘Barcelona model’ of eGovernment: adoption and institutionalisation,” UOC Pap., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–6, 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Shareef, N. Archer, V. Kumar, and U. Kumar, “Developing Fundamental Capabilities for Successful e-government implementation,” J. Public Policy, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 159–177, 2010.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. K. Feeney and E. W. Welch, “Implementing Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Public Organizations: The Mediating Effects of Organization Routineness and Centralization on ICT and Managerial Outcomes,” Proc. 14th Annu. Int. Conf. Digit. Gov. Res., pp. 38–45, 2013, doi: 10.1145/2479724.2479734.spa
dc.relation.referencesC. A. Sanga, S. D. Tumbo, and M. R. S. Mlozi, “System Design and ICT Adoption in Agricultural Extension Services Delivery in Tanzania,” Technol. Dev. Platf. Enhanc. Success. Glob. E-Government Des., no. JUNE, pp. 282–306, 2013, doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4900-2.ch015.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Wahsh and J. S. Dhillon, “An investigation of factors affecting the adoption of cloud computing for E-government implementation,” 2015 IEEE Student Conf. Res. Dev., pp. 323–328, 2015, doi: 10.1109/SCORED.2015.7449349.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Saxena, “Enhancing ICT infrastructure in public services: Factors influencing mobile government (m-government) adoption in India,” Bottom Line, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 279–296, 2017, doi: 10.1108/BL-08-2017-0017.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Choudrie, A. Alfalah, N. Spencer, and D. Sundaram, “Are Older Citizens Using the E-MOI portal in Saudi Arabia, Hail City: A Quantitative Study,” Proc. 51st Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.moi.gov.sa.spa
dc.relation.referencesK. A. Al Mansoori, J. Sarabdeen, and A. L. Tchantchane, “Investigating Emirati citizens’ adoption of e-government services in Abu Dhabi using modified UTAUT model,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 455–481, 2018, doi: 10.1108/ITP-12-2016-0290.spa
dc.relation.referencesT. (David) Lee, H. Park, and J. Lee, “Collaborative accountability for sustainable public health: A Korean perspective on the effective use of ICT-based health risk communication,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 226–236, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.008.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Roy, G. Dutta, and P. K. Das, “Exploring the determinants of mobile-based services diffusion: past determinants, emergent pattern and a proposed framework,” 2019.spa
dc.relation.referencesL. F. Rodriguez-Hevía, J. Navío-Marco, and L. M. Ruiz-Gómez, “Citizens’ involvement in e-government in the European Union: The rising importance of the digital skills,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 17, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12176807.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Lama, S. Pradhan, and A. Shrestha, “Exploration and Implication of Factors affecting e-Tourism Adoption in Developing Countries: A case of Nepal,” Inf. Technol. Tour., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesR. Heeks and E.-E. Ritse, “e-Business Adoption and Use Among African Women- Owned SMEs : An Analytical Study in Nigeria,” Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Dev., pp. 1–10, 2015.spa
dc.relation.referencesK. S. Tan, U. C. Eze, and S. C. Chong, “Effects of Industry Type on ICT Adoption among Malaysian SMEs Effects of Industry Type on ICT Adoption among Malaysian SMEs,” J. Supply Chain Cust. Relatsh. Manag., no. January, 2012, doi: 10.5171/2012.113797.spa
dc.relation.referencesI. Harris, Y. Wang, and H. Wang, “Int . J . Production Economics ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends : Unleashing potential for the future,” Intern. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 159, pp. 88–103, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.005.spa
dc.relation.referencesV. Ahuja, J. Yang, and R. Shankar, “Perceptions Affecting ICT Adoption for Building Project Management in the Indian Construction Industry,” Int. J. Constr. Manag., no. November, pp. 37–41, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2010.10773141.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ.-P. Van-Belle and W. Chigona, “School-level ICT Adoption Factors in the Western Cape Schools,” Proc. 4th IEEE Int. Work. Technol. Educ. Dev. Ctries., no. February 2001, 2006, doi: 10.1109/TEDC.2006.24.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Marasini, R., Ions, K., & Ahmad, “Assessment of e-business adoption in SMEs A study of manufacturing industry in the UK North East region,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 5, pp. 627–644, 2008, doi: 10.1108/17410380810877294.spa
dc.relation.referencesN.-N. Manochehri, R. Al-Esmail, and R. Ashrafi, “Examining the impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on enterprise practices: A preliminary perspective from Qatar,” Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Makiwa, “ICT adoption and use in Zimbabwean SMEs,” 2016 IST-Africa Week Conf., no. May, pp. 1–8, 2016, doi: 10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2016.7530576.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Scupola, “ICT Adoption in Facilities Management Supply Chain : The Case of Denmark,” J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 53–78, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Alaghbandrad, M. B. Nobakht, M. Hosseinalipour, and E. Asnaashari, “ICT adoption in the Iranian construction Industry: Barriers and opportunities,” 28th Int. Symp. Autom. Robot. Constr. IAARC, pp. 280–285, 2011.spa
dc.relation.referencesP. Evangelista and E. Sweeney, “Information and communication technology adoption in the Italian road freight haulage industry,” Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag., vol. 19, no. 3, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesK. Sin-Tan, S. Choy-Chong, B. Lin, and U. Cyril-Eze, “Internet-based ICT adoption : Evidence from Malaysian SMEs Internet-based ICT adoption : evidence from Malaysian SMEs,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., no. March, 2009, doi: 10.1108/02635570910930118.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Imran, “Significant barriers to ICT adoption in the public sector in the Least Developed Countries ( LDCs ): A case study of Bangladesh,” ACIS 2006 Proc., p. 105, 2006.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. M. Dewan and S. A. Nazmin, “The opportunities and barriers of using ICT by Small and Medium Enterprises in Bangladesh : Case of SMEs in BSCIC Industrial Estates,” Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2008, pp. 656–661, 2008.spa
dc.relation.referencesU. Thevi Munikrishnan, N. G. Siew, I. A. Ho, J. O. Ann, R. Nerina, and R. Yusuf, “Drivers and Inhibitors of ICT Adoption in Malaysian Travel Agencies: TOE Perspective,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijem.upm.edu.my.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. Wongsim, R. Sonthiprasat, and O. Surinta, “Factors influencing the adoption of Agricultural Management Information Systems in Thailand,” 2018 3rd Technol. Innov. Manag. Eng. Sci. Int. Conf., pp. 1–4, 2018.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. C. Athapaththu and B. Nishantha, “Information and communication technology adoption in SMEs in Sri Lanka; Current level of ICT usage and perceived barriers,” International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1. IGI Global, pp. 1–15, Jan. 01, 2018, doi: 10.4018/IJEEI.2018010101.spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Singh, J. Thakkar, and M. Jenamani, “An integrated Grey-DEMATEL approach for evaluating ICT adoption barriers in manufacturing SMEs: Analysing Indian MSMEs,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 2019, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2018-0211.spa
dc.relation.referencesF. Petersen, A. Brown, S. Pather, and W. D. Tucker, “Challenges for the adoption of ICT for diabetes self-management in South Africa,” in Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, Sep. 2020, vol. 86, no. 5, doi: 10.1002/isd2.12113.spa
dc.relation.referencesH. Kusuma, M. Muafi, H. M. Aji, and S. Pamungkas, “Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Demographic Characteristics,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 969–980, 2020, doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.969.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Bayona-Oré and R. Estrada, “Critical Success Factors Associated to Tourism e-Commerce: Study of Peruvian Tourism Operators Sussy Bayona-Oré 1,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijacsa.thesai.org.spa
dc.relation.referencesL. Arendt, “Barriers to ICT adoption in SMEs: how to bridge the digital divide?,” J. Syst. Inf. Technol., 2008, doi: 10.1108/13287260810897738.spa
dc.relation.referencesS. Khalid and T. Nyvang, “A change agent ’ s facilitation process for overcoming the barriers of ICT adoption for educational administration – The case of a rural-Bangladesh vocational institution,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 547–561, 2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesM. A. Burhanuddin, F. Arif, V. Azizah, and A. S. Prabuwono, “Barriers and Challenges for Technology Transfer in Malaysian Small and Medium Industries,” 2009 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Eng., no. May, pp. 258–261, 2009, doi: 10.1109/ICIME.2009.39.spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Escobar-Pérez and Á. Cuervo-Martínez, “Validez De Contenido Y Juicio De Expertos: Una Aproximación a Su Utilización,” Av. en Medición, vol. 6, pp. 27–36, 2008.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc320 - Ciencia política (política y gobierno)::321 - Sistemas de gobiernos y de estadosspa
dc.subject.lembINNOVACIONES TECNOLOGICASspa
dc.subject.lembTechnological innovationseng
dc.subject.proposalAdopción de TICspa
dc.subject.proposalGobierno electrónicospa
dc.subject.proposalFactores habilitantesspa
dc.subject.proposalFactores inhibidoresspa
dc.subject.proposalICT adoptioneng
dc.subject.proposale-governmenteng
dc.subject.proposalEnabling factorseng
dc.subject.proposalInhibitory factorseng
dc.titleAdopción de tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en proyectos de gobierno electrónico colombianos: Factores habilitantes e inhibidoresspa
dc.title.translatedAdoption of Information and communication technologies in colombian e-government projects: Enabling and inhibiting factorseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
7186246.2022.pdf
Tamaño:
2.69 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería Industrial
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
4.57 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Ingeniería - Industrial