Análisis de los efectos de los marcos promocionales de ganancia en la intención de compra de consumidores de detergente en tienda online: un ejercicio experimental

dc.contributor.advisorDuque Oliva, Edison Jairspa
dc.contributor.authorBermúdez Sosa, Herbert Jairspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGRIEGO (Grupo Investigación en Gestión y Organizaciones)spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-22T15:52:43Zspa
dc.date.available2020-08-22T15:52:43Zspa
dc.date.issued2019-05-12spa
dc.description.abstractTversky & Kahneman (1986) evidenciaron la forma en que las decisiones humanas podrían cambiar dependiendo de la enmarcación de la situación de decisión, bien sea en un enmarcado de pérdidas o un enmarcado de ganancias. Posteriormente, Campbell et al., (1990) mostraron cómo las promociones ventas, entendidas como beneficios e incentivos para persuadir las ventas de productos (Chandon, 1995), podrían encontrarse enmarcadas en términos de pérdidas (promociones de descuentos) o ganancias (promociones de producto agregado) y afectar el proceso de decisión sobre productos o servicios. Esta investigación se propuso evaluar los posibles efectos que las promociones de producto agregado (marcos de ganancias) ejercían sobre la intención de compra en una categoría de conveniencia como detergentes de ropa en compras online. Se sometieron a 61 sujetos (30 Hombres- 31 Mujeres) a una situación de compra online simulada, en las cuales se encontraba un producto de detergente líquido a la venta en diferentes escenarios (individual y grilla de productos) y con diversas condiciones controladas (etiquetado, marca blanca, diseño, tamaño, contenido y precio), exceptuando el tipo de promoción de producto agregado, en donde se encontraban las siguientes opciones: sin promoción, promoción 2x1, 50% más contenido, producto adicional, 2.5 litros más contenido. Los sujetos mostraron mayor intención de compra por productos asociados con la promoción en formato 2x1 versus las demás promociones en todos los escenarios (sig<0.05), argumentando mayor percepción de ahorro y ganancia al elegir esta opción, lo que evidenció el uso de heurísticos de disponibilidad de información en las personas, mostrando una mayor intención de compra. No obstante, es necesario ampliar los análisis de estos marcos promocionales a nuevas variantes de producto o más categorías y en más escenarios de compra para poder contar con mayores evidencias de los efectos de estas promociones en la intención de compra de los consumidores.spa
dc.description.abstractTversky & Kahneman 1986) demonstrated the way in which decisions can change the situation of the decision depends of the framing, as well as in the framing of losses and in the framing of profits. Subsequently,(Campbell et al., 1990), how sales promotions were made, understood as benefits and incentives for the sale of products (Chandon, 1995), were included in the terms of the losses or promotions (aggregate product) and affect the decision process on products or services. This is an investigation that allows evaluating the possible effects that product promotions (profit frameworks) exert on the intention to buy in a convenience category such as laundry detergents in online purchases. They were subjected to 61 subjects (30 Men- 31 Women) in an online shopping situation, in which they became a liquid detergent product in the sale in different places (individual and product grid) and with diverse controlled conditions (white label, design, size, content and price), except the type of product promotion added, in which the following options are found: no promotion, 2x1 promotion, 50% more content, additional product, 2.5 liters plus content. The subjects arguing greater perception of savings and gain when choosing this option (sig <0.05), which evidences the use of information availability heuristics in people, showing a greater purchase intention. However, it is necessary to broaden the analysis of these promotional frames, new product options or more categories and more means of purchase in order to have greater evidence of the effects of these promotions on the intention to buy from users.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent115spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78174
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Públicaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administraciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAcosta, I., Güereca Lozano, C., Juárez Barba, J. E., Salazar Domínguez, H. J., López Zambada, R., & Torres Maldonado, A. (2010). Estrategias de Promoción y Ventas. 18. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/5502809/Estrategias_de_promocion_y_ventas_PDFspa
dc.relation.referencesAntón Martín, C., & Gutierrez Cillan, J. (1994). Expectativas E Intencion De Compra : Un Estudio Empirico *. IV Encuentro de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing, (1987).spa
dc.relation.referencesBaidya, M., & Maity, B. (2010). Effectiveness of integrated marketing communications. Journal of Indian Business Research, 2(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554191011032929spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, D. A., & Crompton, J. L. (2000). Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 785–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00108-5spa
dc.relation.referencesBarber, N. A., & Taylor, D. C. (2013). Experimental approach to assessing actual wine purchase behavior. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 25(3), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-2012-0013spa
dc.relation.referencesBlattberg, R. C., Briesch, R., & Fox, E. J. (1995). How promotions work. Marketing Science, 14(3), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004spa
dc.relation.referencesBriesch, R., Krishna, A., & Lehmann, D. R. (1997). A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Price Presentation on Deal Evaluation. working pa, 101–118.spa
dc.relation.referencesCámara Colombiana de Comercio Electrónico (CCCE). (2017). En el 2017 las transacciones digitales en Colombia aumentaron 24% con respecto al 2016. Retrieved from https://www.ccce.org.co/noticias/en-el-2017-las-transacciones-digitales-en-colombia-aumentaron-24-con-respecto-al-2016spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1995). Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social. In Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social (7th ed., p. 153). Buenos Aires: Talleres Graficos Color.spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, L., & Diamond, W. D. (1990). Framing and Sales Promotions: The characteristics of a "Good Deal". Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), 25–31.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, D. O. V. (2015). Análisis de los beneficios percibidos en la promoción de venta. 43–62.spa
dc.relation.referencesCazier, J., Shao, B., & Louis, R. St. (2017). Value Congruence, Trust, and Their Effects on Purchase Intention and Reservation Price. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 8(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3110939spa
dc.relation.referencesChandon, P. (1995). Consumer research on sales promotions: A state of the art literature review. Journal of Marketing Management, 11(5), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1995.9964357spa
dc.relation.referencesChang, H.-H., Tsai, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-H. (2009). Knowledge Characteristics, Implementation Measures, and Performance in Taiwan Hospital Organization. The International Journal of Business and Information, 4(1), 23–44.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, C., Xie, K., & Wang, S. (2017). The influence of incidental affect and mood-changing price on online booking intention. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 8(3), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-07-2016-0036spa
dc.relation.referencesChiu, S. C., Liu, C. H., & Tu, J. H. (2016). The influence of tourists’ expectations on purchase intention: Linking marketing strategy for low-cost airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 53, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.03.010spa
dc.relation.referencesCrespo Almendros, E., & Del Barrio García, S. (2010). El usuario de promociones de ventas on-line. Influencia de la experiencia de uso con la marca y con el medio. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de La Empresa, 17(2008), 59–83. Retrieved from https://www.mendeley.com/research/el-usuario-promociones-ventas-online-influencia-la-experiencia-uso-con-la-marca-y-con-el-medio/spa
dc.relation.referencesDarke, P. R., & Chung, C. M. Y. (2005). Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: It depends on how you frame it. Journal of Retailing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesDarke, P. R., & Dahl, D. W. (2003). Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_13spa
dc.relation.referencesDarke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1993). Deciding whether to seek a bargain: Effects of both amount and percentage off. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 960–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.960spa
dc.relation.referencesDemangeot, C., & Broderick, A. J. (2010). Consumer Perceptions of Online Shopping Environments. Psychology & Marketing, 30(6), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/marspa
dc.relation.referencesDiamond, W. D. (1989). The Framing of Sales Promotions: Effects on Reference Price Change. Advances in Consumer Research, 16(1), 241–247.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiamond, W. D. (1990). Schemas Determining the Incentive Value of Sales Promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 7(3), 163–175.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiamond, W. D., & Johnson, R. R. (1990). The Framing of Sales Promotions: An Approach to Classification. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 494–500.spa
dc.relation.referencesDoob, A. N., & et al. (1969). Effect of initial selling price on subsequent sales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(4), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027415spa
dc.relation.referencesEscobar Moreno, N. R. (2014). Revista Semestre Economico. In Semestre Económico (Vol. 17). Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-63462014000100008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=enspa
dc.relation.referencesGamliel, E., & Herstein, R. (2011). To save or to lose: does framing price promotion affect consumers’ purchase intentions? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761111115999spa
dc.relation.referencesGamliel, E., & Herstein, R. (2012). Effects of message framing and involvement on price deal effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 46(9), 1215–1232. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211247838spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, M., Danglot, C., & Vega, L. (2003). Sinopsis de pruebas estadísticas no paramétricas. Cuándo usarlas. Revista Mexicana de Pediatría, 70(2), 99. Retrieved from https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/pediat/sp-2003/sp032i.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHarrer, R., & Lackner, M. (2014). Integrated marketing communications in the commercialisation of intellectual property. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 7(1/2), 47. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2014.062793spa
dc.relation.referencesHorn, D. (1998). Los hombros de los gigantes. pp. 1–4. Retrieved from https://mafiadoc.com/los-hombros-de-los-gigantes-este-pais_5a2ac82d1723dd2aae4ade19.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesHruschka, H., Lukanowicz, M., & Buchta, C. (1999). Cross-category sales promotion effects. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 6(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(98)00026-5spa
dc.relation.referencesHuhn, R., Brantes Ferreira, J., Sabino de Freitas, A., & Leão, F. (2018). The effects of social media opinion leaders’ recommendations on followers’ intention to buy. Review of Business Management, 20(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v20i1.3678spa
dc.relation.referencesJan Van De Kaa, E. (2010). Prospect Theory and Choice Behaviour Strategies: Review and Synthesis of Concepts from Social and Transport sciences. EJTIR Issue, 10(4), 299–329. Retrieved from www.ejtir.tbm.tudelft.nlspa
dc.relation.referencesJauch, M.-O. (2014). Uniform Across-the-Board Promotions. In Contributions to Management Science (1st ed., pp. 7–34). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07115-2spa
dc.relation.referencesKahnemann, & Tversky. (1979). Prospect Theory: an Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Eccconometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006spa
dc.relation.referencesKai, Chen; Xiaofan, Wang; Qiuying, Zhen; Huanhuan, L. (2013). An Exploratory Study of Influence Factors about Consumer´s Online Group Buying Intention. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(8), 1370–1375.spa
dc.relation.referencesKowatsch, T., Maass, W., & Fleisch, E. (2011). The role of product reviews on mobile devices for in-store purchases: consumers’ usage intentions, costs and store preferences. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 6(3), 226. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIMA.2011.038237spa
dc.relation.referencesLeeflang, P. S. H., Parre??o Selva, J., Van Dijk, A., & Wittink, D. R. (2008). Decomposing the sales promotion bump accounting for cross-category effects. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.003spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, S., Sun, Y., & Wang, Y. (2007). 50% off or buy one get one free? Frame preference as a function of consumable nature in dairy products. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(4), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.4.413-422spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, H. H., & Chou, H. Y. (2015). The effects of promotional frames of sales packages on perceived price increases and repurchase intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.06.005spa
dc.relation.referencesMarch, J. G. (1982). Theories of choice and making decisions. Society, 20(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694989spa
dc.relation.referencesMarketing Fact Pack. (2014). Advertising Age. Marketing Fact Pack Report.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarketing Science Institute (MSI). (2016). Research Priorities 2016–2018. Marketing Science Institute (MSI), 21. Retrieved from http://www.msi.org/uploads/articles/MSI_RP16-18.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMuhamad, N., Leong, V. S., & Md Isa, N. (2017). Does the country of origin of a halal logo matter? The case of packaged food purchases. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(4), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-06-2017-0049spa
dc.relation.referencesNabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881spa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen. (2014). ASÍ SON LOS HÁBITOS DE LIMPIEZA EN LOS HOGARES COLOMBIANOS. Newspaper, p. 4. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/co/es/insights/news/2016/Asi-son-los-habitos-de-limpieza-en-los-hogares-colombianos.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesNies, S., Leeflang, P. S. H., Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Natter, M. (2010). Multi-Unit Price Promotions and Their Impact on Sales Multi-Unit Price Promotions and Their Impact on Sales.spa
dc.relation.referencesNowak, G. J., & Phelps, J. (1994). Conceptualizing the integrated marketing communications’ phenomenon: An examination of its impact on advertising practices and its implications for advertising research. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 16(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1994.10505012spa
dc.relation.referencesPate, L. E. (2007). Using Theories as " Overlays " for Improved Managerial. Management Decision, 26(1), 36–40.spa
dc.relation.referencesPuelles Gallo, M., Llorens Marín, M., & Talledo Flores, H. (2014). Perceptions of control as a determinant of the intention to purchase organic products . Innovar, 24(54), 139–152. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84907764194&partnerID=40&md5=849e14f3fb92f9506433eaee486030a8spa
dc.relation.referencesQuivy, R., & Campenhoudt, L. Van. (1992). Manual de Investigación en. Ciencias Sociales. In Limusa,Grupo Noriega (Vol. 6).spa
dc.relation.referencesRaghubir, P. (2004). Free gift with Purchase: Promoting or discounting the brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_20spa
dc.relation.referencesRaghubir, P. (2005). Framing a price bundle: the case of “buy/get” offers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510592617spa
dc.relation.referencesRaghubir, P., & Celly, K. S. (2011). Promoting promotions: Does showcasing free gifts backfire? Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.022spa
dc.relation.referencesRahim, R. A., Sulaiman, Z., Chin, T. A., Baharun, R., & Muharam, F. M. (2016). Measuring electronic word of mouth review adoption on green purchase intention using source credibility theory. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4283–4287. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8129spa
dc.relation.referencesRahim, R. A., Sulaiman, Z., Chin, T. A., Zaidin, N., & Zakuan, N. (2015). E-WOM review adoption and green purchase intention: The application of source credibility Theory (SCT). Advanced Science Letters, 21(6), 2150–2154. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6238spa
dc.relation.referencesRamanathan, S., & Dhar, S. K. (2010). The Effect of Sales Promotions on the Size and Composition of the Shopping Basket: Regulatory Compatibility from Framing and Temporal Restrictions. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.3.542spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, P. J., & Duque, E. J. (2014). Involucramiento de producto y lealtad de marca para productos de consumo masivo en Bogotá D.C.☆. Estudios Gerenciales, 29(128), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.09.004spa
dc.relation.referencesRezvani, S., Dehkordi, G. J., Rahman, M. S., Fouladivanda, F., Habibi, M., & Eghtebasi, S. (2012). A conceptual study on the country of origin effect on consumer purchase intention. Asian Social Science, 8(12), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n12p205spa
dc.relation.referencesScalco, A., Noventa, S., Sartori, R., & Ceschi, A. (2017). Predicting organic food consumption: A meta-analytic structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 112, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.007spa
dc.relation.referencesSethna, B. N., Hazari, S., & Bergiel, B. (2017). Influence of user generated content in online shopping: impact of gender on purchase behaviour, trust, and intention to purchase. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, 8(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEMR.2017.10008550spa
dc.relation.referencesShen, F. (2014). Perceived fit and deal framing: the moderating effect of perceived fit on sales promotions in line and brand extensions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(4/5), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2013-0463spa
dc.relation.referencesSiegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (2017). Estadística no paramétrica, aplicada a las ciencias de la conducta. 4a. edición. México: Editorial Trillas. In Estadística no paramétrica, aplicada a las ciencias de la conducta. 4a. edición. México: Editorial Trillas (4th ed.). https://doi.org/10.26439/persona1998.n001.1715spa
dc.relation.referencesSilvente, V. B., & Hurtado, R. (2012). Clasificación de pruebas no paramétricas . Cómo aplicarlas. Revista de Innovación e Investigación En Educación, 5, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2012.5.2528spa
dc.relation.referencesSoh, C. Q. Y., Rezaei, S., & Gu, M.-L. (2017). A structural model of the antecedents and consequences of Generation Y luxury fashion goods purchase decisions. Young Consumers, 18(2), 180–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-12-2016-00654spa
dc.relation.referencesSpears, N. (2001a). Time pressure and information in sales promotion strategy: Conceptual framework and content analysis. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673632spa
dc.relation.referencesSpears, N. (2001b). Time Pressure and Information in Sales Promotion Strategy: Conceptual Framework and Content Analysis. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673632spa
dc.relation.referencesSrinivasan, S. S., & Anderson, R. E. (1998). Concepts and strategy guidelines for designing value enhancing sales promotions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(5), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429810237745spa
dc.relation.referencesTeng, C. C., & Lu, C. H. (2016). Organic food consumption in Taiwan: Motives, involvement, and purchase intention under the moderating role of uncertainty. Appetite, 105, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.006spa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819740927%293%3A185%3A4157%3C1124%3AJUUHAB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Mspa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory, 59(2), 251–278. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-9398%2528198610%252959%253A4%253CS251%253ARCATFO%253E2.0.CO%253B2-Cspa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986b). The framing of decisions and the evaluation of prospects. In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics (Vol. 114). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70710-4spa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect-Theory - Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1007/Bf00122574spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, E. S. T. (2017). Different Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Benefits of Retail Food Packaging on Perceived Product Quality and Purchase Intention. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2014.885867spa
dc.relation.referencesWeisstein, F. L., Monroe, K. B., & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2013). Effects of price framing on consumers’ perceptions of online dynamic pricing practices. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0330-0spa
dc.relation.referencesYang, J., Sarathy, R., & Walsh, S. M. (2016). Do review valence and review volume impact consumers’ purchase decisions as assumed? Nankai Business Review International, 7(2), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-11-2015-0028spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao, X., Deng, S., & Zhou, Y. (2017). The impact of reference effects on online purchase intention of agricultural products. Internet Research, 27(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2016-0082spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc658 - Gerencia generalspa
dc.subject.ddc381 - Comercio interno (Comercio doméstico)spa
dc.subject.proposalpromociónspa
dc.subject.proposalpromotioneng
dc.subject.proposalpurchase intentioneng
dc.subject.proposalintención de compraspa
dc.subject.proposalmarco promocionalspa
dc.subject.proposalpromotional frameworkeng
dc.subject.proposalefecto marcospa
dc.subject.proposalframework effecteng
dc.subject.proposaldetergentespa
dc.subject.proposaldetergenteng
dc.subject.proposalonline purchaseeng
dc.subject.proposalcompra onlinespa
dc.subject.proposalconsumer behavioreng
dc.subject.proposalcomportamiento del consumidorspa
dc.titleAnálisis de los efectos de los marcos promocionales de ganancia en la intención de compra de consumidores de detergente en tienda online: un ejercicio experimentalspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
HerbertBermudez.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
2.47 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.8 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: