Análisis fisiológico y acústico de adquisición fonológica de inglés como L2 en aprendices tardíos nativos de español

dc.contributor.advisorVera Diettes, Kelly Johanna
dc.contributor.authorVerdugo Moreno, Diego Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-14T20:08:07Z
dc.date.available2024-11-14T20:08:07Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionilustraciones, graficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractLa presente investigación busca analizar los procesos cognitivos relacionados con la creación de categorías fonológicas para inglés como L2 por parte de aprendices tardíos nativos de español. Para esto se toman como principales referentes teóricos a 3 modelos de aprendizaje de la fonología en una segunda lengua: primero, el modelo imán de la lengua materna (NLM); segundo, el modelo de aprendizaje de habla (SLM); tercero, el modelo de asimilación perceptiva (PAM). Estos modelos coinciden en que para considerar un hablante como competente es necesario que perciba y produzca de forma adecuada, por eso, esta investigación realiza una medición objetiva de estas habilidades en una población de diez hablantes bilingües con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y los 30 años, de dominancia diestra, con español como lengua materna e inglés como L2, quienes aprendieron su L2 en edades posteriores a la adolescencia. La producción se evalúa mediante el análisis acústico del espectrograma de algunas vocales generadas ante diferentes tareas como denominación o lectura de palabras y pseudopalabras, técnicas que han sido ampliamente utilizadas en los estudios de fonología en segunda lengua. La percepción es evaluada a través del análisis fisiológico mediante la medición de la dirección de la primera fijación y la duración de las fijaciones medidas con el Eye Tracking en pruebas de discriminación auditiva con pares mínimos vocálicos como estímulos. Esta técnica permite identificar el grado de atención que se le da a determinado estímulo. Finalmente, se realiza una correlación entre el análisis acústico, el análisis, fisiológico y las pruebas conductuales con el fin de determinar si se han creado nuevas categorías para las vocales del inglés como L2. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThis research aims to analyze the cognitive processes related to the creation of phonological categories for English as a second language (L2) by late learners who are native Spanish speakers. For this purpose, the study draws primarily on three theoretical models of second language phonological learning: first, the Native Language Magnet Model (NLM); second, the Speech Learning Model (SLM); and third, the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM). These models agree that for a speaker to be considered competent, they must be able to perceive and produce speech accurately. Therefore, this research conducts an objective measurement of these abilities in a population of ten bilingual speakers aged 18 to 30, all right-handed, with Spanish as their native language and English as their L2, who learned their L2 after adolescence. Production is evaluated through acoustic analysis of the spectrogram of certain vowels generated in response to tasks such as naming or reading words and pseudowords—techniques widely used in second language phonology studies. Perception is assessed through physiological analysis, measuring the direction of the first fixation and the duration of fixations using Eye Tracking in auditory discrimination tests with minimal vowel pairs as stimuli. This technique allows for the identification of the degree of attention given to a particular stimulus. Finally, a correlation is made between the acoustic analysis, the physiological analysis, and the behavioral tests in order to determine whether new categories for English L2 vowels have been created.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Lingüísticaspa
dc.description.methodsLa investigación se enmarca en el paradigma cuantitativo, con un diseño experimental que permite un análisis y comparación de los datos obtenidos a través de las distintas pruebas. Además, para el análisis de la percepción se sigue la lógica del paradigma del mundo visual, metodología que integra el procesamiento visual con diferentes sentidos y que ha mostrado ser efectiva en el estudio de diferentes aspectos del lenguaje.spa
dc.description.researchareaBilingüismo y contactospa
dc.format.extent96 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/87179
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Lingüísticaspa
dc.relation.referencesAleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., Stankevich, L. N., & Uplisova, K. O. (2017).Effects of Russian-Language Word Frequency on Mismatch Negativity. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology,47 (9), 1043-1050 doi:10.1007/s11055- 017-0510-3.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnabalón, R., & Vivanco, C. (2014). Análisis de desviaciones en la pronunciación de segmentos consonánticos producidas por hablantes de español de chile aprendientes de inglés. Lenguas Modernas, 43 (1), 11-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesAoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250. doi:10.1016/s0095- 4470(03)00036-6spa
dc.relation.referencesBassetti, B., & Atkinson, N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 67-91. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1017/S0142716414000435spa
dc.relation.referencesBest, C.T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. En W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and linguistic experience: Issues in crosslanguage speech research (pp. 172-206). Timonium, MD: York Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBest, C. T., Bradlow, A. R., Guion-Anderson, S., & Polka, L. (2011). Using the lens of phonetic experience to resolve phonological forms. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 453–455. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.006.spa
dc.relation.referencesBest, C. T., & Hallé, P. A. (2010). Perception of initial obstruent voicing is influenced by gestural organization. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 109–126. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.09.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBest, C. T., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O. S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Second- language Speech Learning: The Role of Language Experience in Speech Perception and Production. A Festschrift in Honour of James E. Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjaminsspa
dc.relation.referencesBoersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2018) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37, retrieved 14 March 2018 from http://www.praat.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesBühler, J. C., Schmid, S., & Maurer, U. (2016). Influence of dialect use on speech perception: a mismatch negativity study. Language, cognition and neuroscience, doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1272704.spa
dc.relation.referencesBUNDGAARD-NIELSEN, R. L., BEST, C. T., & TYLER, M. D. (2010). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(01), 51– 67. doi:10.1017/s0142716410000287spa
dc.relation.referencesCatherine T. Best, Louis M. Goldstein, Hosung Nam & Michael D. Tyler (2016) Articulating What Infants Attune to in Native Speech, Ecological Psychology, 28:4, 216-261, DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2016.1230372spa
dc.relation.referencesCorrea, M. (2011). La enseñanza de fonética y fonología a través de analogías y metáforas. Hispana, 94 (2), 110-121. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032176.spa
dc.relation.referencesDesmeules-Trudel, F., & Brunelle, M. (2018). Phonotactic restrictions condition the realization of vowel nasality and nasal coarticulation: Duration and airflow measurements in Québécois French and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 43-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., Escera, C., & Sebastiãn-Gallés, N. (2016). Variability in L2 phonemic learning originates from speech-specific capabilities: An MMN study on late bilinguals. Bilingualism, 19(5), 955-970.spa
dc.relation.referencesDomahs, U., Kehrein, W., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). Event-related potentials reflecting the processing of phonological constraint violations. Language and Speech, 52, 415-35. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.unal.edu.co/docview/89071351?accountid=150292spa
dc.relation.referencesEscudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.spa
dc.relation.referencesFaris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non- native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2018.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesFInch F. D. & Ortiz, H. (1982). A course in english phonetics for spanish speakers. London : Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 692–707. doi:10.1121/1.391256spa
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (1991). The Interlingual Identification of Spanish and English Vowels: Orthographic Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(3), 701–731. doi:10.1080/14640749108400993spa
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. En W. Strange (Ed.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross- language research (pp. 229-273), Timonium, MD: York Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. En A. MEyer, & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319- 355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987. doi:10.1121/1.428116spa
dc.relation.referencesMendousse, K. (2011). Towards a mental representation of vowel height in SSBE speakers. International Journal of English Studies, 12 (1), 1-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrenck-Mestre, C., Meunier, C., Espesser, R., Daffner, K., & Holcomb, P. (2005). Perceiving nonnative vowels: The effect of context on perception as evidenced by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1496-510. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.unal.edu.co/docview/232340964?accountid=150292 28.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2724. doi:10.1121/1.428657spa
dc.relation.referencesHodson, B. W., & Paden, E. P. (1981). Phonological Processes Which Characterize Unintelligible and Intelligible Speech in Early Childhood. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(4), 369. doi:10.1044/jshd.4604.369.spa
dc.relation.referencesInceoglu, S. (2016). Effects of perceptual training on second language vowel perception and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1175-1199. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1017/S0142716415000533spa
dc.relation.referencesIverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (2000). Perceptual magnet and phoneme boundary effects in speech perception: Do they arise from a common mechanism? Perception & Psychophysics, 62(4), 874–886. doi:10.3758/bf03206929spa
dc.relation.referencesIverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87(1), B47–B57. doi:10.1016/s0010- 0277(02)00198-1spa
dc.relation.referencesKissling, E. M. (2015). Phonetics instruction improves learners’ perception of L2 sounds. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 254–275. https://doi- org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1177/1362168814541735spa
dc.relation.referencesKivistö-de, S. H. (2015). Phonological Awareness and Pronunciation in a Second Language (tesis doctoral). University of Barcelona, Barcelona España.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. K. (1993). Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: The native language magnet theory. In B. deBoysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. McNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 259-274). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishersspa
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. K. (2000a). Language, mind, and brain: Experience alters perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 99-115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P.K. (2000b). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11850-11857spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 979–1000. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2154spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhl, P. k., & Meltzoff, A. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 2425-2438spa
dc.relation.referencesLadefoged, P. & Johnson, K. (2011). A Course in Phonetics, Sixth Edition . Boston: Wadsworth.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarklund, E., Lacerda, F., & Schwarz, I. C. (2018). Using rotated speech to approximate the acoustic mismatch negativity response to speech. Brain and Language, 176, 26- 35 tomado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.006.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Salud Protección Social. (19 de marzo de 2024). Ciclo de vida. Obtenido de https://www.minsalud.gov.co/proteccionsocial/Paginas/cicloVida.aspxspa
dc.relation.referencesMorrison, G. S. (2008). L1-spanish speakers' acquisition of the english /i /--/I/ contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech, 51(4), 285-315. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1177/0023830908099067spa
dc.relation.referencesMorrison, G. S. (2009). L1-spanish speakers' acquisition of the english /i /--/I/ contrast II: perception of vowel inherent spectral change. Language and Speech, 52(4), 437- 462.spa
dc.relation.referencesNäätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., ... & Alho, K. (1997). “Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses,” Nature, 385, 432–434spa
dc.relation.referencesOlsen, M. K (2016). Limitations of the influence of english phonetics and phonology on l2 spanish rhotics. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 5 (2), 313-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.7557/1.5.2.3898spa
dc.relation.referencesOrduz, N. Y. (2012). La transferencia de la fonología de la lengua materna en la adquisición del inglés como lengua extranjera. Entornos, 25, 91-103.spa
dc.relation.referencesOwens, R. E. (2003). Desarrollo del Lenguaje, Quinta edición. Madrid: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN. Redondo, V. B. (2015). Aproximación a la percepción de las consonantes inglesas por aprendices de l2: beneficios del entrenamiento auditivo intensivo (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla España.spa
dc.relation.referencesRello, L. (2007). la relación entre fonética y fonología. Universidad complutense de Madrid. Madrid, España.spa
dc.relation.referencesRochet, B (1995). Perception and production of L2 speech sounds by adults. In: Winifred Strange (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 379-410. Timonium, MD: York Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSalesa, B. E., Perelló, S. e., & Bonavida, E. A. (2013). Tratado de audiología, segunda edición. España: MASSON.spa
dc.relation.referencesSo, C.K. & Best, C.T. (2011). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech 53(2): 273-293.spa
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd., (2005), EyeLink 1000 User Manual. http://sr- research.jp/support/EyeLink%201000%20User%20Manual%201.5.0.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd. (2017). EyeLink Experiment Builder (Versión 2.1.140). [Software].spa
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd. URL. https://www.sr-research.com/experiment-builder/spa
dc.relation.referencesSR Research Ltd. (2017). EyeLink Data Viewer (Versión 3.1). [Software]. SR Research Ltd. URL. https://www.sr-research.com/data-viewer/spa
dc.relation.referencesStach, B. A. (2010). Clinical audiology: an introduction, Second edition. New York United States of America: Delmar.spa
dc.relation.referencesSokal, R.R. and Rohlf. F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman. New York.spa
dc.relation.referencesSusanibar F., Dioses A., &Huamaní O. (2013). Fundamentos para la evaluación de las alteraciones del habla de origen fonético – fonológico. . In. Susanibar F, Parra D, Dioses A. Motricidad Orofacial: Fundamentos basados en evidencia. drid. EOS.spa
dc.relation.referencesTanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632-1634.spa
dc.relation.referencesTampas, J. W., Harkrider, A. W., & Hedrick, M. S. (2005). Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1147-64. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.unal.edu.co/docview/232341140?accountid=150292spa
dc.relation.referencesTrecca, F., Bleses, D., Madsen, T. O., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Does sound structure affect word learning? An eye-tracking study of Danish learning toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 180-203.spa
dc.relation.referencesVera, K. J. (2014). Fenómenos de reducción vocálica por hablantes colombianos de inglés como l2: un estudio acústico. Forma y función, 27, 11-43.spa
dc.relation.referencesWiener, S., Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2021). Effects of multitalker input and instructional method on the dimension-based statistical learning of syllable-tone combinations: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 155-180.spa
dc.relation.referencesZaiontz, C. (2023). Real Statistics (Versión 9.0). [Software]. Recuperado de https://www.real-statistics.com/.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Iverson, P., Pruitt, J., Stevens, E. B., … Nemoto, I. (2009). Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: A magnetoencephalography study. NeuroImage, 46(1), 226–240. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.028.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc410 - Lingüística::414 - Fonología y fonética de formas estándar de lenguajesspa
dc.subject.lembTRANSPORTE FISIOLOGICO DEL SODIOspa
dc.subject.lembVOCALESspa
dc.subject.lembVowelseng
dc.subject.lembFONETICAspa
dc.subject.lembPhoneticseng
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis acústicospa
dc.subject.proposalAprendices tardíosspa
dc.subject.proposalInglés L2spa
dc.subject.proposalFonología de segunda leguaspa
dc.subject.proposalSeguimiento ocularspa
dc.subject.proposalAcoustic analysiseng
dc.subject.proposalLate learnerseng
dc.subject.proposalSecond language phonologyeng
dc.subject.proposalEnglish L2eng
dc.subject.proposalEye Trackingeng
dc.titleAnálisis fisiológico y acústico de adquisición fonológica de inglés como L2 en aprendices tardíos nativos de españolspa
dc.title.translatedPhysiological and Acoustic Analysis of Phonological Acquisition of English as a L2 in Late Learners Native of Spanisheng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1003648637.2024.pdf
Tamaño:
1.09 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Lingüística

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: