Thou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombia

dc.contributor.advisorAshmore, Malcolm Thomasspa
dc.contributor.advisorRestrepo Forero, Olga Matíldespa
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Valderrama, Miller Oswaldospa
dc.contributor.illustratorGonzález, Dahiana (Pepita Ritu)spa
dc.contributor.researchgroupEstudios Sociales de la Ciencia, la Tecnología Y la Medicinaspa
dc.coverage.countryColombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-15T15:36:43Z
dc.date.available2022-02-15T15:36:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-05
dc.descriptionilustraciones, fotografías, gráficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractThis thesis deals with the presence of a sacred object in a modern institution. For this, I take a naturally-occurring metaphor seriously, during my ethnographic passage through this institution between August and December of 2019. According to this metaphor, a file is sacred because it is a public document. I ask how a technology of legal knowledge -an inscription- such as the file becomes a sacred object in the hands of its holders. For this, I focus on the practices of touching tutela files in their reviewing. I analyse how the sacred speaks of two different ways of touching and relating with the file: as a working document and as the history of a case. One in which writing and touch are part of the business-as-usual of the Court, and the other in which writing and the touch on files are restricted and forbidden in their circulation. I focus on the transformation of one version of the file into another, in which the Court and the file become a macro actor (a Wholly-other entity), while other actors are absent from their representational practices. Thus, I show how the file organizes the Court and how, in the same movement, it becomes touchy and touching: something delicate that must be protected, being endowed with the risky capacity to record everything in its path. In this, the file is also granted the capacity to touch, producing an emotional witnessing of the Court.eng
dc.description.abstractEsta tesis se ocupa de un objeto sagrado en una institución moderna. Para esto, tomo en serio una metáfora naturalmente ocurrida durante mi paso etnográfico por la Corte Constitucional entre agosto y diciembre de 2019, según la cual un expediente es sagrado al ser un documento público. Me pregunto cómo una tecnología de conocimiento jurídico -una inscripción- como el expediente se convierte en un objeto sagrado en manos de quienes lo manejan y, para ello, me centro en las prácticas de tocar los expedientes de tutela en su revisión. Analizo cómo lo sagrado habla de dos formas diferentes de tocar y relacionarse con esta tecnología: como documento de trabajo y como historia de un caso. En una de estas, la escritura y el tacto de expedientes forman parte del funcionamiento habitual de la Corte y, en la otra, la escritura y el tacto del expediente están restringidos y prohibidos en su circulación. Me centro en la transformación de una versión del expediente en otra, donde la Corte y el expediente se convierten en un macro actor (uno totalmente-otro), mientras que otros actores son invisibilizados en sus prácticas de representación. Así, muestro cómo el expediente organiza la Corte y cómo, en el mismo movimiento, éste se vuelve sensible y envolvente: algo delicado que debe ser protegido, siendo dotado con la riesgosa capacidad de registrar todo a su paso. En esto, al expediente también le es concedida la capacidad de tocar, produciendo un testimonio emocional de la Corte. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Estudios Sociales de La Cienciaspa
dc.description.notesIncluye anexosspa
dc.format.extentxi, 156 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80986
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Sociologíaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbello Castiblanco, C. J. (2016). Forma y fondo: una etnografía de la materialidad de la justicia en Cali. Universitas Humanística, 335–363.spa
dc.relation.referencesAshmore, M., & Restrepo Forero, O. (2013). El documento en su paso por la notaría: confianza, formalidad y credibilidad en Colombia. Ensamblado En Colombia, 2, 407–428.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke university Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarad, K. (2012). On touching—The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23(3), 206–223.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrera, L. (2008). Files circulation and the forms of legal experts: agency and personhood in the Argentine Supreme Court. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 1(1), 3–24.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrera, L. (2009). Performing the court: forms and practices of legal knowledge-making in Argentina. Cornell University.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrera, L. (2011). Más allá de los fines del derecho: expedientes, burocracia y conocimiento legal. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (41), 57–72.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeira-Combariza, A. R. (2018). ¡Apague y vámonos! Análisis de una controversia entre expertos y legos en los estrados judiciales colombianos: riesgos de la energía eléctrica (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/64783/1/Apague y Vamonos.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesBerg, M., & Bowker, G. (1997). The Multiple Bodies of the Medical Record: Toward a Sociology of an Artifact. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(3), 513–537.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerger, P. L. (1970). A rumor of angels: Modern society and the rediscovery of the supernatural. Anchor.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerger, P. L. (2011). The sacred canopy. Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Open Road Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesBiehl, J. (2014). Ethnography in the Way of Theory. In The Ground Between (pp. 94–118). Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlake, R. J. C. (2011). Ethnographies of touch and touching ethnographies: some prospects for touch in anthropological enquiries. Anthropology Matters, 13(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesBowker, G., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchely, L. (2018). The Affective State and Precarious Citizenship: Conflict, Historical Memory, and Forgiveness in Bojayá, Colombia. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 10(1), 7–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay BT. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief. A new Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge and Kegan Paul.spa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277–303).spa
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, C. C. (2017). The Bill factory : how documents , numbers , and boundaries work to produce law in the Congress of Colombia (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/59332/spa
dc.relation.referencesClassen, C. (2012). The Deepest Sense: A cultural history of touch. Urbana, Chicago, and Springfield: university of illinois press.spa
dc.relation.referencesClassen, C. (2020). Fingerprints. Writing about touch. In C. Classen (Ed.), The Book of Touch (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoopmans, C., Vertesi, J., Lynch, M. E., & Woolgar, S. (2014). Representation in scientific practice revisited. MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorte Constitucional de Colombia. (2019). ABECÉ de la Acción de Tutela. Serie Documento No. 32 (p. 20). p. 20.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeane-Drummond, C., Bergmann, S., & Szerszynski, B. (2015). Technofutures, Nature and the Sacred: Transdisciplinary Perspectives. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.spa
dc.relation.referencesDemerath III, N. J. (2000). The Varieties of Sacred Experience: Finding the Sacred in a Secular Grove. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00001spa
dc.relation.referencesDouglas, M. (2001). Purity and Danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803856700100211spa
dc.relation.referencesDurkheim, E. (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesEliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane. The nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrancis, M., & Knott, K. (2011). Return? It never left. Exploring the “sacred” as a resource for bridging the gap between the religious and the secular. In C. Kutz, H. Riss, & O. Roy (Eds.), Religious Norms in the Public Sphere (pp. 44–48). Berkley: European University Institute.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrison, P. (2016). Angels on pinheads and needles’ points. Notes and Queries, 63(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gjv232spa
dc.relation.referencesHerzfeld, M. (1993). The Social Production of Indifference. Exploring the Symbolic Rootes of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHull, M. S. (2003). The file: Agency, authority, and autography in an Islamabad bureaucracy. Language and Communication, 23(3–4), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00019-3spa
dc.relation.referencesHull, M. S. (2012a). Documents and Bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 251–267.spa
dc.relation.referencesHull, M. S. (2012b). Government of Paper. The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkley, Los Ángeles, London: University of California Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo, I. C., & Buchely, L. F. (2019). La etnografía burocrática como herramienta crítica en el derecho administrativo. In I. Jaramillo & L. Buchely (Eds.), Etnografías Burocráticas- Una nueva mirada a la construcción del estado en Colombia (|, pp. 9–33). https://doi.org/10.15425/2017.210spa
dc.relation.referencesJasanoff, S. (2004a). Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesJasanoff, S. (2004b). The idiom of co-production. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, 1–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesKameo, N., & Whalen, J. (2015). Organizing Documents: Standard Forms, Person Production and Organizational Action. Qualitative Sociology, 38(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9302-7spa
dc.relation.referencesKnott, K. (2013). The Secular Sacred: In between or both/and? In C. Day, Abby; Vincett, Giselle; Cotter (Ed.), Social identities Between the Sacred and the Secular (pp. 145–160). Ashgate Publishing Limited.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1984). The powers of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1\_suppl), 264–280.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1990a). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1\_suppl), 103–131.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1990b). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. Representation in Scientific Practice Ed Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, 6(1962), 1–32.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 15–25.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2000). Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. London: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2001). ‘Thou Shalt Not Take the Lord’s Name in Vain’: Being a Sort of Sermon on the Hesitations of Religious Speech. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 39(1), 215–234.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2005a). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2005b). ‘Thou Shall Not Freeze-Frame,’or, How Not to Misunderstand the Science and Religion Debate. In J. D. Proctor (Ed.), Science, Religion, and the Human Experience (pp. 27–48). New York: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2010a). On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham and London: Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2010b). The Making of the Law: an Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge: Polity Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard university press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence. Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (2014). Rejoicing: Or the torments of religious speech. John Wiley & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatta, A. (2014). Matter, politics and the sacred: insurgent ecologies of citizenship. Cultural Geographies, 21(3), 323– 341.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. In After Method: Mess in Social Science Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, 3, 141–158.spa
dc.relation.referencesLewandowski, A. (2014). O Direito em Última Instância : Uma Etnografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal O Direito em Última Instância : Uma Etnografia do Supremo Tribunal Federal (Universidade de Brasilia). Retrieved from http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/18359spa
dc.relation.referencesLewandowski, A. (2016). O direito através dos processos: notas sobre as práticas jurídicas no Supremo Tribunal Federal. Anuário Antropológico, 41(2), 157–178.spa
dc.relation.referencesLondoño Botero, R. (2011). Juan De la Cruz Varela. Sociedad y política en la región de Sumapaz (1902-1984). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesLynch, G. (2012). The sacred in the modern world: A cultural sociological approach. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLynch, G., & Sheldon, R. (2013). The sociology of the sacred: A conversation with Jeffrey Alexander. Culture and Religion, 14(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2012.758163spa
dc.relation.referencesLynch, M. (1988). Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science, 18(2), 265–289.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarx, K. (1906). Capital: a critique of political economy. New York: Random House, INC.spa
dc.relation.referencesMatory, J. L. (2018). The Fetish Revisited: Marx, Freud, and the Gods Black People Make. Durham and London: Duke University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesMauss, M. (1966). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen & West LTD.spa
dc.relation.referencesMol, A. (2003). The body multiple. Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMora-Gámez, F. (2016). Reconocimiento de víctimas del conflicto armado en Colombia: sobre tecnologías de representación y configuraciones de Estado. Universitas Humanística, (82).spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, N. (2015). Rendering life molecular: Models, modelers, and excitable matter. Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNavaro-Yashin, Y. (2007). Make-believe papers, legal forms and the counterfeit. Anthropological Theory, 7(1), 79–98.spa
dc.relation.referencesNavaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The Make-Believe Space. Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (2004). The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlarte-sierra, M. F. (2019). Of flesh and bone: emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed con flict. Tapuya : Latin American Science , Technology and Society, 2(1), 77–93.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrdoñez-Castillo, D. J. (2018). Del testigo virtual al testigo emocional: lugares, tecnologías y afectos en el Museo Casa de la Memoria de Medellín. Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/70725/spa
dc.relation.referencesOtto, R. (1936). The idea of the holly. London: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPassoth, J.-H., & Rowland, N. J. (2010). Actor-network state: Integrating actor-network theory and state theory. International Sociology, 25(6), 818–841.spa
dc.relation.referencesPaterson, M. (2007). The Senses of Touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Berg.spa
dc.relation.referencesPellegrino, V. (2017). Incumplir cumpliendo: una etnografía al papeleo del Auto 004. Universidad de los Andesspa
dc.relation.referencesPellegrino, V. (2021). Cifras de papel: la rendición de cuentas del Gobierno colombiano ante la justicia como una manera de incumplir cumpliendo. Antipoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, (42), 3–27.spa
dc.relation.referencesPels, P. (2012). The Modern Fear of Matter: Reflections on the Protestantism of Victorian Science. In B. Meyer & D. Houtman (Eds.), Things: Religion and the Question of Materiality (pp. 27–39). New York: Fordham University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPottage, A. (2012). The Materiality of What? Journal of Law and Society, 39(1), 167–183.spa
dc.relation.referencesPotter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrior, L. (2008). Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology, 42(5), 821–836.spa
dc.relation.referencesPuig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPuig De La Bellacasa, M. (2009). Touching technologies, touching visions. The reclaiming of sensorial experience and the politics of speculative thinking. Subjectivity, 28(1), 297–315.spa
dc.relation.referencesRanquetat Júnior, C. A. (2012). Laicidade à brasileira: um estudo sobre a controvérsia em torno da presença de símbolos religiosos em espaços públicos. UFGRS.spa
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo Forero, O., & Ashmore, M. (2021). The guerrilla’s ID card: Flatland against Fatland in Colombia. In S. Woolgar, E. Vogel, D. Moats, & C.-F. Helgesson (Eds.), The Imposter As Social Theory: thinking with gatecrashers, cheats and charlatans. Bristol: Bristol University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo Forero, O., & Gómez Morales, Y. J. (2016). El árbol celular y la pregunta por cómo se ensamblan ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 39(2), 13–27.spa
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo Forero, O., Guerra, S., & Ashmore, M. (2013). La ciudadanía de papel: ensamblando la cédula y el estado. Ensamblado En Colombia, 2, 277–327.spa
dc.relation.referencesRighetti, N. (2014). The sacred in current social sciences research. Italian Sociological Review, 4(1), 133–163.spa
dc.relation.referencesSacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 413–429.spa
dc.relation.referencesSerje, M. (2012). El mito de la ausencia del Estado: la incorporación económica de las “zonas de frontera” en Colombia. Cahiers Des Amériques Latines, (71), 95–117.spa
dc.relation.referencesShapin, S. (1984). Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology. Social Studies of Science, 14(4), 481–520.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2007). Introduction. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The Anthropology of the state: a reader (pp. 1–42). India: Blackwell Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, D. E. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 257–268.spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (1990). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review, 38(1\_suppl), 26–56.spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (1995). The Politics of Formal Representations: Wizards, Gurús and Organizational Complexities. In Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology (pp. 88–118). Albany: State University of New York Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (2002). Got infrastructure? How standards, categories, and other aspects of infrastructure influence communication. 2nd Social Study of IT Workshop at the LSE ICT and Globalization.spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1), 9–30.spa
dc.relation.referencesStausberg, M. (2017). The sacred and the holy – from around 1917 to today. Religion, 47(4), 549–556.spa
dc.relation.referencesStengers, I. (2010). Including nonhumans in political theory: opening the Pandora’s box? In I. Braun, B; Whatmore, SJ; Stengers (Ed.), Political matter (pp. 3–33). University of Minnesota Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSzerszynski, B. (2005). Nature, Technology and the Sacred. London: Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaussig, M. (1992). The Nervous System. New York and London: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Oorschot, I., & Schinkel, W. (2015). The Legal Case File as Border Object: On Self-reference and Other-reference in Criminal Law. Journal of Law and Society, 42(4), 499–527.spa
dc.relation.referencesVismann, C. (2008). Files: Law and Media Technology, trans. Stanford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1; G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeber, M. (1993). The sociology of religion. Beacon Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeber, M. (2004). Max Weber. The Vocation Lecturers (T. B. Owen, David; Strong, Ed.).spa
dc.relation.referencesWeber, M. (2005). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London and New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesWissink, L., & van Oorschot, I. (2020). Affective bureaucratic relations: File practices in a European deportation unit and criminal court. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.spa
dc.relation.referencesWoolgar, S. (1981). Discovery: logic and sequence in a scientific text (1). In The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 239–268). Springer.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::301 - Sociología y antropologíaspa
dc.subject.lembEthnologyeng
dc.subject.lembEtnologíaspa
dc.subject.lembFile of papers bearing on a caseeng
dc.subject.lembExpedientesspa
dc.subject.lembOrganizational sociologyeng
dc.subject.lembSociología organizacionalspa
dc.subject.proposalInscriptionseng
dc.subject.proposalBureaucracieseng
dc.subject.proposalToucheng
dc.subject.proposalAffectseng
dc.subject.proposalEthnographyeng
dc.subject.proposalConstitutional Court of Colombiaeng
dc.subject.proposalLo sagradospa
dc.subject.proposalInscripcionesspa
dc.subject.proposaletnografíaspa
dc.subject.proposalCorte Constitucional de Colombiaspa
dc.subject.proposalThe sacredeng
dc.subject.proposalBurocraciasspa
dc.subject.proposalTactospa
dc.subject.proposalAfectosspa
dc.titleThou shalt not write. Reading inscriptions, touching files and the sacred in the Constitutional Court of Colombiaeng
dc.title.translatedNo escribirás: leer inscripciones, tocar expedientes y lo sagrado en la Corte Constitucional de Colombiaspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1013639613.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
2.58 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: