Servicios ecosistémicos y bienestar humano: Servicios de regulación y abastecimiento para la población del Suroeste Antioqueño, bajo un contexto de cambio climático

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorCárdenas Agudelo, María Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorTejada Ladino, Marlon Alejandro
dc.contributor.cvlacTejada-Ladino, MAspa
dc.contributor.orcidTejada-Ladino, MA [0000-0002-8617-5172]spa
dc.contributor.orcidTejada Ladino, Marlon Alejandro [0000000286175172]spa
dc.contributor.researchgateMarlon ALEJANDRO Tejada Ladinospa
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T14:25:27Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T14:25:27Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionIlustraciones, mapasspa
dc.description.abstractLa pérdida acelerada de biodiversidad, impulsada por la deforestación y el cambio climático, ha deteriorado los ecosistemas y afectado el bienestar humano. En Colombia, Antioquia ha experimentado una notable reducción de bosques, principalmente debido a la ganadería y la expansión agrícola. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo evaluar la relación entre los servicios ecosistémicos de retención de sedimentos, captura de carbono, provisión de alimentos y provisión de agua y, el bienestar humano en el Suroeste Antioqueño, en un contexto de cambio climático, por lo que en un primer momento se determinó el grado de transformación de los ecosistemas naturales en 2002 y 2018, luego se estimó la oferta de los servicios ecosistémicos mediante el software InVEST, y finalmente, se relacionó mencionada oferta con el bienestar humano y las proyecciones de cambio climático, utilizando el método de Pearson y el software GeoDa para las correlaciones y ArcGIS 10.4 para la visualización de resultados. Los hallazgos indican una pérdida de aproximadamente 23.526 hectáreas de bosque, principalmente convertidas en áreas agrícolas y pastos y, aunque los ecosistemas más conservados ofrecen más oferta de los servicios ecosistémicos evaluados, la relación con el bienestar humano no es lineal, dado que, en 2002, una mayor disponibilidad de servicios se asociaba con menor bienestar, mientras que en 2018 fue al contrario. La investigación resalta la importancia de una gestión participativa para la conservación de los ecosistemas, para que así, estos aumenten la provisión de servicios esenciales a la población.spa
dc.description.abstractThe accelerated loss of biodiversity, driven by deforestation and climate change, has deteriorated ecosystems and affected human well-being. In Colombia, Antioquia has experienced a notable reduction of forests, mainly due to livestock and agricultural expansion. This research aims to assess the relationship between the ecosystem services of sediment retention, carbon capture, crop production and water yield, with human well-being in Southwestern Antioquia, in a context of climate change. Initially, the degree of transformation of natural ecosystems in 2002 and 2018 was determined, then the supply of ecosystem services was estimated using the InVEST software. Finally, the ES supply was related to climate change projections and human well-being, using the Pearson method and GeoDa software for correlations, and ArcGIS 10.4 for results visualization. The findings indicate a loss of approximately 23,526 hectares of forest, mainly transformed into agricultural areas and pastures. Although the most conserved ecosystems have a higher supply of the ES evaluated, the relationship with human well-being is not linear: in 2002, greater availability of services was associated with lower well-being, while in 2018 it was the opposite. The research highlights the importance of participatory management for the conservation of ecosystems, seeking to increase the provision of essential services to the population.eng
dc.description.curricularareaÁrea Curricular de Arquitectura y Urbanismospa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Estudios Urbano - Regionalesspa
dc.format.extent132 páginsaspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/87578
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Arquitecturaspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellín, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Arquitectura - Maestría en Estudios Urbano - Regionalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAgarwala, M., Atkinson, G., Fry, B. P., Homewood, K., Mourato, S., Rowcliffe, J. M., Wallace, G., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2014). Assessing the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services: A review of frameworks. Conservation and Society, 12(4), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.155592spa
dc.relation.referencesAguilar, L. E., Granat, M. E., & Owren, C. E. (2017). Las raíces del futuro: situación actual y progreso en género y cambio climático. Washington, D.C.: IUCN Library Sistemspa
dc.relation.referencesAlaoui, H. I., Chemchaoui, A., & Kacem, H. A. (2024). Economic valuation of sediment retention services in the Oued-Beht watershed (Morocco): A spatiotemporal analysis using InVEST SDR-InVEST model. Ecological Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOFRO.2024.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesAlatartseva, E., & Barysheva, G. (2015). Well-being: Subjective and Objective Aspects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.479spa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, J., & Rodríguez Pérez, C. (2015). La dinámica reciente del paisaje del puerto de Leitariegos. Ería, 98, 241–274spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson-Teixeira, K. J., Davies, S. J., Bennett, A. C., Gonzalez-Akre, E. B., Muller-Landau, H. C., Joseph Wright, S., Abu Salim, K., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Alonso, A., Baltzer, J. L., Basset, Y., Bourg, N. A., Broadbent, E. N., Brockelman, W. Y., Bunyavejchewin, S., Burslem, D. F. R. P., Butt, N., Cao, M., Cardenas, D., … Zimmerman, J. (2015). CTFS-ForestGEO: a worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change. Global Change Biology, 21(2), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCB.12712spa
dc.relation.referencesAnselin, L. (2024). An Introduction to Spatial Data Science with GeoDa: Volume 1 - Exploring Spatial Data. An Introduction to Spatial Data Science with GeoDa: Volume 1 - Exploring Spatial Data, 1–424. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003274919/INTRODUCTION-SPATIAL-DATA-SCIENCE-GEODA-LUC-ANSELIN/ACCESSIBILITY-INFORMATIONspa
dc.relation.referencesBalmford, A., & Bond, W. (2005). Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecology Letters, 8(11), 1218–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1461-0248.2005.00814.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesBoumans, R., Roman, J., Altman, I., & Kaufman, L. (2015). The Multiscale Integrated Model of Ecosystem Services (MIMES): Simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems. Ecosystem Services, 12, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2015.01.004spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002spa
dc.relation.referencesBuytaert, W., Vuille, M., Dewulf, A., Urrutia, R., Karmalkar, A., & Célleri, R. (2010). Uncertainties in climate change projections and regional downscaling in the tropical Andes: Implications for water resources management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(7), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.5194/HESS-14-1247-2010spa
dc.relation.referencesCamacho Valdéz, V., & Ruiz Luna, A. (2012). Marco conceptual y clasificación de los servicios ecosistémicos. Revista Bio Ciencias. https://revistabiociencias.uan.edu.mx/index.php/BIOCIENCIAS/article/view/19/17spa
dc.relation.referencesCamargo, E. S. C., Carreño, J. A. F., & Barón, E. M. P. (2012). Los servicios ecosistémicos de regulación: tendencias e impacto en el bienestar humano. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 3(1), 77–83spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, M. F., & Tobón, C. (2017). Recuperación del funcionamiento hidrológico de ecosistemas de páramo en Colombia. Revista UDCA Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, 20(2), 403–412spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, M. F., Tobón, C., Rock, B. N., & del Valle, J. I. (2018). Ecophysiology of frailejones (Espeletia spp.), and its contribution to the hydrological functioning of páramo ecosystems. Plant Ecology, 219(2), 185–198spa
dc.relation.referencesCardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., MacE, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S., & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 2012 486:7401, 486(7401), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148spa
dc.relation.referencesCEPAL. (2021). La igualdad de género ante el Cambio Climático. Santiago : Naciones Unidasspa
dc.relation.referencesChen, X., Lin, S., Tian, J., Wang, Y., Ye, Y., Dong, S., Gong, X., Lin, Q., & Zhu, L. (2024). Simulation study on water yield service flow based on the InVEST-Geoda-Gephi network: A case study on Wuyi Mountains, China. Ecological Indicators, 159, 111694. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2024.111694spa
dc.relation.referencesGobernación de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana & Sistema General de Regalías. (2015). Proyecto Análisis de las implicaciones sociales y económicas de las Autopistas para la Prosperidad en el departamento de Antioquia. Medellínspa
dc.relation.referencesCollard, D. (2006). Research on well-being: Some advice from Jeremy Bentham. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393106289795spa
dc.relation.referencesConsejo territorial de Planeación de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Gobernación de Antioquia. (2020). Subregión del suroeste, perfil de desarrollo subregional. Consejo territorial de Planeación de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Gobernación de Antioquia. https://ctpantioquia.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/perfil-subregion-suroeste.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCorrea Londoño, G. (2013). El Análisis de Covarianza como Mecanismo de Control de Factores de Confusión. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 66(1), 6981–6985spa
dc.relation.referencesCostanza, R., D’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Sutton, P., & Van Den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0spa
dc.relation.referencesCorantioquia. (2018). Plan de Ordenamiento y Manejo de la Cuenca Hidrográfica. Corantioquia.spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz-Garcia, G. S., Sachet, E., Blundo-Canto, G., Vanegas, M., & Quintero, M. (2017). To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia, and Latin America? Ecosystem Services, 25, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.04.005spa
dc.relation.referencesCurrie, W. S. (2011). Units of nature or processes across scales? The ecosystem concept at age 75. In New Phytologist (Vol. 190, Issue 1, pp. 21–34). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03646.xspa
dc.relation.referencesDaily, G. (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 392spa
dc.relation.referencesDavies, E. G. R., & Simonovic, S. P. (2005). Climate change and the hydrological cycle. In 17th Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference (August 17-19, 2005), Edmonton, Albertaspa
dc.relation.referencesDaw, T. M., Hicks, C., Brown, K., Chaigneau, T., Januchowski-Hartley, F., Cheung, W., Rosendo, S., Crona, B., Coulthard, S., Sandbrook, C., Perry, C., Bandeira, S., Muthiga, N. A., Schulte-Herbrüggen, B., Bosire, J., Mcclanahan, T. R., Daw, T. M., Hicks, C. C., Brown, K., … Mcclanahan, T. R. (2016). Elasticity in ecosystem services: exploring the variable relationship between ecosystems and human well-being. Ecology and Society, Published Online: Apr 25, 2016 | Doi:10.5751/ES-08173-210211, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08173-210211spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Leo, G. A., & Levin, S. (1997). The multifaceted aspects of ecosystem integrity. Conservation Ecology, 1(1)spa
dc.relation.referencesde Lima Abouhamad, S., Ramírez, M. V. R., Ramírez, J. L. M., Céspedes, K. S., & Alpízar, A. L. S. (2017). Servicios ecosistémicos de regulación que benefician a la sociedad y su relación con la restauración ecológica. Biocenosis, 31(1–2)spa
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, L. E., & Marín, V. H. (2016). Well-being and the use of ecosystem services by rural households of the Río Cruces watershed, southern Chile. Ecosystem Services, 21, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2016.07.017spa
dc.relation.referencesDi Gregorio, A., & Jansen, L. J. (1998). A new concept for a land cover classification system. The Land, 2(1), 55–65spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, S., & Cabido, M. (2001). Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16(11), 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz S, Fargione J, Chapin III F. S, & Tilman D. (2006). Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being. PLOS BIOLOGY. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.g001spa
dc.relation.referencesDiener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 69(5), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851spa
dc.relation.referencesDiener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0963-7214.2004.00501001.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesDodds, S. (1997). Towards a ‘science of sustainability’: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being. Ecological Economics, 23(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00047-5spa
dc.relation.referencesEguiguren, P., Fischer, R., & Günter, S. (2019). Degradation of Ecosystem Services and Deforestation in Landscapes With and Without Incentive-Based Forest Conservation in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Forests 2019, Vol. 10, Page 442, 10(5), 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/F10050442spa
dc.relation.referencesEva, H. D., Belward, A. S., De Miranda, E. E., Di Bella, C. M., Gond, V., Huber, O., Jones, S., Sgrenzaroli, M., & Fritz, S. (2004). A land cover map of South America. Global Change Biology, 10(5), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1529-8817.2003.00774.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesFOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO). (2007). Global mapping of agricultural provision systems. Bangkok: PPLPI Meetin Reportspa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. (2020). Evaluación de los recursos forestales mundiales-Informe Colombiaspa
dc.relation.referencesFelipe-Lucia, M. R., Soliveres, S., Penone, C., Fischer, M., Ammer, C., Boch, S., Boeddinghaus, R. S., Bonkowski, M., Buscot, F., Fiore-Donno, A. M., Frank, K., Goldmann, K., Gossner, M. M., Hölzel, N., Jochum, M., Kandeler, E., Klaus, V. H., Kleinebecker, T., Leimer, S., … Allan, E. (2020). Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(45), 28140–28149. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2016210117/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.2016210117.SAPP.PDFspa
dc.relation.referencesField, C. B., Barros, V. R., Dokken, D. J., Mach, K. J., Mastrandrea Codirector, M. D., Calvo Buendía, E., Moreno, J. M., Eren Bilir, T., Chatterjee, M., Yuka, K. L. E., Estrada, O., Genova, R. C., Girma, B., Kissel, E. S., Levy, A. N., Maccracken, S., Mastrandrea, P. R., & White, L. L. (2014). Cambio climático 2014 Impactos, adaptación y vulnerabilidad Edición a cargo de Editores científicos para la traducción. www.ipcc.chspa
dc.relation.referencesFisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Llamas, P., Geijzendorffer, I. R., García-Nieto, A. P., Calvo, L., Suárez-Seoane, S., & Cramer, W. (2019). Impact of land cover change on ecosystem service supply in mountain systems: a case study in the Cantabrian Mountains (NW of Spain). Regional Environmental Change, 19(2), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10113-018-1419-2/TABLES/4spa
dc.relation.referencesGassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007). The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), 1211–1250spa
dc.relation.referencesGignoux, J., Davies, I. D., Flint, S. R., & Zucker, J. D. (2011). The ecosystem in practice: Interest and problems of an old definition for constructing ecological models. Ecosystems, 14, 1039–1054spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, D., Giraldo, C., & Lopez-Perez, F. (2024). Desarrollo regenerativo. Una propuesta aplicada a la provincia Cartama, Antioquia. Medellín : Centro de Estudios En Economía Sistémica ECSIMspa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Baggethun, E., & de Groot, R. (2007). Capital natural y funciones de los ecosistemas: explorando las bases ecológicas de la economía. Ecosistemas, 16(3)spa
dc.relation.referencesGóngora, V., & Castro Solano, A. (2018). Bienestar emocional, psicológico y social y variables demográficas en población adulta de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. 18. https://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v18i1.740spa
dc.relation.referencesGrêt-Regamey, A., Celio, E., Klein, T. M., & Wissen Hayek, U. (2013). Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2012.10.011spa
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez, J. E., Carvajal, A. F., Nito, V., & Iván Bernal. (2017). Tercera Comunicación Nacional de Cambio Climático Colombiaspa
dc.relation.referencesHaddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., Lovejoy, T. E., Sexton, J. O., Austin, M. P., Collins, C. D., Cook, W. M., Damschen, E. I., Ewers, R. M., Foster, B. L., Jenkins, C. N., King, A. J., Laurance, W. F., Levey, D. J., Margules, C. R., … Townshend, J. R. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.1500052spa
dc.relation.referencesHallaj, Z., Bijani, M., Karamidehkordi, E., Yousefpour, R., & Yousefzadeh, H. (2024). Forest land use change effects on biodiversity ecosystem services and human well-being: A systematic analysis. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 23, 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDIC.2024.100445spa
dc.relation.referencesHayden, F. G., & Mahin, T. A. (2022). Integrating the Concepts of Zero Greenhouse-Gas Emissions, the Precautionary Principle, and Environmental Impact Statements for Climate Change Policy Mitigation. Journal of Economic Issues, 56(2), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2022.2057168spa
dc.relation.referencesHowe, C., Suich, H., Vira, B., & Mace, G. M. (2014). Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, M., Zhang, G., Wang, Q., Yin, Q., Wang, J., Li, W., Feng, S., Ke, Q., & Guo, Q. (2023). Evaluation of typical ecosystem services in Dabie Mountain area and its application in improving residents’ well-being. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1195644. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2023.1195644/BIBTEXspa
dc.relation.referencesHuber, O., & Alarcón, C. (1988). Mapa de vegetación de Venezuela, 1:2.000.000. Ministerio Del Ambiente y de Los Recursos Naturales Renovablesspa
dc.relation.referencesHuertas, G., & Jiménez, F. (2010). Una guía de diagnóstico rápido para determinar el potencial de pago por servicios ecosistémicos hídricos en microcuencas hidrográficas. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales, 40(2), 34–43spa
dc.relation.referencesHuth, J., Kuenzer, C., Wehrmann, T., Gebhardt, S., Tuan, V. Q., & Dech, S. (2012). Land Cover and Land Use Classification with TWOPAC: towards Automated Processing for Pixel- and Object-Based Image Classification. Remote Sensing 2012, Vol. 4, Pages 2530-2553, 4(9), 2530–2553. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS4092530spa
dc.relation.referencesIAVH. (2014). Biomas en las áreas operativas de Ecopetrol. Escala 1:100.000. https://www.colombiaenmapas.gov.co/spa
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM. (2015a). Escenario cambio de la precipitación para Colombia (%) para el 2011- 2040 vs 1976-2005. http://www.siac.gov.co/catalogo-de-mapasspa
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM. (2015b). Escenario diferencia de la temperatura media (°C) para el 2011-2040 vs 1976-2005. http://www.siac.gov.co/catalogo-de-mapasspa
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. (2017). Vulnerabilidad y Riesgo http://www.ideam.gov.co/web/siac/climaticovulnerabilidadspa
dc.relation.referencesIDEAM. (2023). Riesgo de desastres y Cambio climático. En Desigualdad territorial, movilidad espacial y vulnerabilidad. ASP COLOMBIAspa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Brasilero de Geografia Estatística. (1993). Mapa de vegetação do Brasil, 1:5.000,000. Río de Janeirospa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto de Hidrología, M. y E. A. (IDEAM), Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (Instituto Humboldt), Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras José Benito Vives de Andréis (Invemar), & Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC). (2017). Memoria técnica. Mapa de ecosistemas continentales, costeros y marinos de Colombia (MEC), escala 1:100.000. Escala 1:100.000, 170 ppspa
dc.relation.referencesIPCC. (2007). Fourth Assessment Report Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Reportspa
dc.relation.referencesIPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023 Synthesis Report IPCC, 2023: Sections. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 35–115. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647spa
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, A., Gabriel, J., & Tapia, M. (2017). Ecología Forestal: Una mirada desde la UNESUM. Grupo COMPAS, Universidad Estatal Del Sur de Manabí, Jipijapa, Ecuador, 141spa
dc.relation.referencesJordan, C. F. (1981). Do ecosystems exist? American Naturalist, 118, 284–287spa
dc.relation.referencesJosse, C., Cuesta, F., Navarro, G., Cabrera, E., Chacón Moreno, E., Ferreira, W., & Tovar, A. (2009). Ecosistemas de Los Andes del Norte y Centro. Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú y Venezuela. Secretaría General de La Comunidad Andina, Programa Regional ECOBONA, Condesan. Proyecto Páramo Andino, Programa BioAndes, EcoCiencia, NatureServe, LTA-UNALM: Lima: Instituto Humbolt, ICAE-ULA-CDCUNALM-RUMBOL SRL, 100ppspa
dc.relation.referencesKandziora, M., Burkhard, B., & Müller, F. (2013). Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosystem Services, 4, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001spa
dc.relation.referencesKing, M. F., Renó, V. F., & Novo, E. M. L. M. (2014). The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review. In Social Indicators Research (Vol. 116, Issue 3, pp. 681–698). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0spa
dc.relation.referencesLalinde, J. D. H., Castro, F. E., Rodríguez, J. E., Rangel, J. G. C., Sierra, C. A. T., Torrado, M. K. A., & Pirela, V. J. B. (2018). Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: definición, propiedades y suposiciones. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica, 37(5), 587–595spa
dc.relation.referencesLanz, B., Dietz, S., & Swanson, T. (2018). The Expansion of Modern Agriculture and Global Biodiversity Decline: An Integrated Assessment. Ecological Economics, 144, 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.07.018spa
dc.relation.referencesLaterra, P., Nahuelhual, L., & Barral, M. P. (2019). ¿De dónde salen y adónde van a parar los servicios ecosistémicos?: La oferta, la demanda y sus indicadoresspa
dc.relation.referencesLeisher, C., Samberg, L. H., Van Beukering, P., & Sanjayan, M. (2009). Focal Areas for Measuring the Human Well-Being Impacts of a Conservation Initiative. 5, 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5030997spa
dc.relation.referencesLindeman, R. L. (1942). The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23(4), 399–417spa
dc.relation.referencesLogsdon, R. A., & Chaubey, I. (2013). A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 257, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.009spa
dc.relation.referencesMalinga, R., Gordon, L. J., Jewitt, G., & Lindborg, R. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents-A review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006spa
dc.relation.referencesMarino, D., Palmieri, M., Marucci, A., & Pili, S. (2022). Long-term land cover changes and ecosystem services variation: have the anthropogenic transformations degraded human well-being in Italy? Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 77(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-13448spa
dc.relation.referencesMárquez, G. (2000). Vegetación, población y huella ecológica como indicadores de sostenibilidad en Colombia. Gestión y Ambiente, 3(5), 33–50spa
dc.relation.referencesMEA. (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis[M]. Washington DC, USA: Island Press. Island Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesMedina, L. (2019). Pequeña propiedad rural y asociatividad: un análisis desde el Desarrollo Humano. El caso de Salgar y Venecia, dos municipios del suroeste del departamento de Antioquia, Colombia. Master’s Thesis, Buenos Aires: FLACSO. Sede Académica Argentinaspa
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, W. B., & Turner, B. L. (1992). Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 39–61spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. (2021). ¿Qué es el Cambio Climático?spa
dc.relation.referencesMirghaed, F. A., & Souri, B. (2023). Contribution of land use, soil properties and topographic features for providing of ecosystem services. Ecological Engineering, 189, 106898. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLENG.2023.106898spa
dc.relation.referencesMohanRajan, S. N., Loganathan, A., & Manoharan, P. (2020). Survey on Land Use/Land Cover (LU/LC) change analysis in remote sensing and GIS environment: Techniques and Challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 29900–29926. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-09091-7/FIGURES/4spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, S. R., & Vayá, E. V. (2002). Econometría espacial: nuevas técnicas para el análisis regional. Una aplicación a las regiones europeas. Investigaciones Regionales-Journal of Regional Research, 1, 83–106spa
dc.relation.referencesMüller, O. V, & Berbery, E. H. (2019). El efecto de los cambios en el uso sobre servicios ecosistémicos intermedios relacionados con la regulación climática. El caso de la cuenca del Plataspa
dc.relation.referencesMulligan, M., & Burke, S. M. (2005). FIESTA fog interception for the enhancement of streamflow in tropical áreas. Final Technical Report for AMBIOTEK Contribution to DfID FRP R7991. This Publication Is an Output from a Research Project Funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) for the Benefit of Developing Countries., 7991spa
dc.relation.referencesMunang, R., Thiaw, I., Alverson, K., Liu, J., & Han, Z. (2013). The role of ecosystem services in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSUST.2013.02.002spa
dc.relation.referencesMuñoz Umaña, C. (2007). PERSPECTIVA PSICOLÓGICA DEL BIENESTAR SUBJETIVO PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING CAROLINA MUÑOZ UMAÑA*. Noviembre, 10(18), 163–173. www.unisimonbolivar.edu.co/publicaciones/index.php/psicogentespa
dc.relation.referencesNedd, R., Light, K., Owens, M., James, N., Johnson, E., & Anandhi, A. (2021). A Synthesis of Land Use/Land Cover Studies: Definitions, Classification Systems, Meta-Studies, Challenges and Knowledge Gaps on a Global Landscape. Land 2021, Vol. 10, Page 994, 10(9), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND10090994spa
dc.relation.referencesNelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D. R., Chan, K. M. A., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T. H., & Shaw, M. R. (2009). Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1890/080023spa
dc.relation.referencesNiemelä, J., Saarela, S. R., Söderman, T., Kopperoinen, L., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Väre, S., & Kotze, D. J. (2010). Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: A Finland case study. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(11), 3225–3243. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10531-010-9888-8/METRICSspa
dc.relation.referencesOBA. (2020). Ficha interactiva: causas de la deforestación en Antioquia (2000-2019)spa
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, V., & Urbina-Cardona, N. (2017). Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: Publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges. Ecosystem Services, 26, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.06.011spa
dc.relation.referencesOdum, E. P. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd (ed.) WB Saunders. Philadelphia, PAspa
dc.relation.referencesOswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327(5965), 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1180606/SUPPL_FILE/OSWALD.SOM.REVISION1.PDFspa
dc.relation.referencesParuelo, J. M., & Laterra, P. (2019). El lugar de la naturaleza en la toma de decisiones servicios ecosistémicos y ordenamiento territorial ruralspa
dc.relation.referencesPiyathilake, I. D. U. H., Udayakumara, E. P. N., Ranaweera, L. V., & Gunatilake, S. K. (2022). Modeling predictive assessment of carbon storage using InVEST model in Uva province, Sri Lanka. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(2), 2213–2223. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40808-021-01207-3/FIGURES/6spa
dc.relation.referencesPouzols, F. M., Toivonen, T., Minin, E. Di, Kukkala, A. S., Kullberg, P., Kuustera, J., Lehtomaki, J., Tenkanen, H., Verburg, P. H., & Moilanen, A. (2014). Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 2014 516:7531, 516(7531), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14032spa
dc.relation.referencesQiu, J., & Turner, M. G. (2015). Importance of landscape heterogeneity in sustaining hydrologic ecosystem services in an agricultural watershed. Ecosphere, 6(11), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00312.1spa
dc.relation.referencesRaiesi, F., & Beheshti, A. (2022). Evaluating forest soil quality after deforestation and loss of ecosystem services using network analysis and factor analysis techniques. CATENA, 208, 105778. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CATENA.2021.105778spa
dc.relation.referencesReyes-Palomino, S. E., Cano Ccoa, D. M., Reyes-Palomino, S. E., & Cano Ccoa, D. M. (2022). Efectos de la agricultura intensiva y el cambio climático sobre la biodiversidad. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas, 24(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.18271/RIA.2022.328spa
dc.relation.referencesReygadas, Y., Spera, S. A., & Salisbury, D. S. (2023). Effects of deforestation and forest degradation on ecosystem service indicators across the Southwestern Amazon. Ecological Indicators, 147, 109996. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2023.109996spa
dc.relation.referencesRincón-Ruiz, A., Echeverry-Duque, M., Piñeros-Quiceno, A. M., Tapia-Caicedo, C., David-Drews, A., Arias-Arévalo, P., & Zuluaga-Guerra, P. A. (2014). Valoración integral de la biodiversidad y sus servicios ecosistémicos. Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldtspa
dc.relation.referencesSandifer, P. A., Sutton-Grier, A. E., & Ward, B. P. (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2014.12.007spa
dc.relation.referencesSchägner, J. P., Schägner, S., Brander, L., Maes, J., & Hartje, V. (2013). Mapping ecosystem services’ values: Current practice and future prospects. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003spa
dc.relation.referencesSchirpke, U., & Tasser, E. (2021). Trends in Ecosystem Services across Europe Due to Land-Use/Cover Changes. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 7095, 13(13), 7095. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13137095spa
dc.relation.referencesSchizas, D., & Stamou, G. (2010). Beyond identity crisis: The challenge of recontextualizing ecosystem delimitation. Ecological Modelling, 221(12), 1630–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2010.03.004spa
dc.relation.referencesSen, A. (1985). Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 169–221spa
dc.relation.referencesSiabato, W., & Guzmán-Manrique, J. (2019). La autocorrelación espacial y el desarrollo de la geografía cuantitativa. Revista Colombiana de Geografía, 28(1), 1–22spa
dc.relation.referencesSierra, R. (ed. ). (1999). Propuesta preliminar de un Sistema de Clasificación de Vegetación para el Ecuador Continental. Proyecto INEFAN/GEF-BIRF y EcoCiencia. Quitospa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, L. M., Case, J. L., Smith, H. M., Harwell, L. C., & Summers, J. K. (2013). Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index. Ecological Indicators, 28, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2012.02.032spa
dc.relation.referencesStock, A. (2012). El cambio climático desde una perspectiva de género. Quito, Ecuador: Fundación Friedrich Ebertspa
dc.relation.referencesSuich, H., Howe, C., & Mace, G. (2015). Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A review of the empirical links. Ecosystem Services, 12, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2015.02.005spa
dc.relation.referencesSummers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Case, J. L., & Linthurst, R. A. (2012). A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. Ambio, 41(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13280-012-0256-7/METRICSspa
dc.relation.referencesTallis, H., & Polasky, S. (2009). Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural-Resource Management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162(1), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1749-6632.2009.04152.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesTan, J., Peng, L., Wu, W., & Huang, Q. (2023). Mapping the evolution patterns of urbanization, ecosystem service supply–demand, and human well-being: A tree-like landscape perspective. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110591. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2023.110591spa
dc.relation.referencesTansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307spa
dc.relation.referencesUniversidad de Antioquia. (2023). Plan de CTi+E 2040 Subregión del Suroeste. Universidad de Antioquia.https://planesregionalescti.parquedelemprendimiento.co/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5.-Plan_regional_tomo_suroeste.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVergara, G. C. V. (2017). Percepción social de los servicios ecosistémicos en la microcuenca El Padmi, Ecuador. Revibec: Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 27, 102–114spa
dc.relation.referencesVilla, F., Ceroni, M., Bagstad, K., Johnson, G., & Krivov, S. (2009). ARIES (Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services): A new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual BIOECON Conference on Economic Instruments to Enhance the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity, Venice, Italy, (Vol. 21)spa
dc.relation.referencesVillamagna, A., & Giesecke, C. (2014). Adapting Human Well-being Frameworks for Ecosystem Service Assessments across Diverse Landscapes. Ecology and Society, Published Online: Feb 04, 2014 | Doi:10.5751/ES-06173-190111, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06173-190111spa
dc.relation.referencesVillatoro, P. (2012). La medición del bienestar a través de indicadores subjetivos: Una revisiónspa
dc.relation.referencesVreugdenhil, D., Meerman, J., Meyrat, A., Gómez, L. D., & Graham, D. J. (2002). Map of the Ecosystems of Central America: Final Report. http://www.worldbank.org/ca-envspa
dc.relation.referencesWaage, S., Armstrong, K., Hwang, L., & Bagstad, K. (2011). New business decision-making aids in an era of complexity, scrutiny, and uncertainty: tools for identifying, assessing, and valuing ecosystem services. Tools for Identifying, Assessing, and Valuing Ecosystem Services. BSR’s Ecosystem Services, Tools & Markets Working Groupspa
dc.relation.referencesWu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 999–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10980-013-9894-9/METRICSspa
dc.relation.referencesWulder, M. A., Coops, N. C., Roy, D. P., White, J. C., & Hermosilla, T. (2018). Land cover 2.0. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(12), 4254–4284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1452075spa
dc.relation.referencesYandun, J. P., & Sánchez, A. E. (2024). Análisis de los drenajes dobles y su influencia en el cultivo de café en los municipios jardín, fredonia, concordia, támesis y andes del departamento de antioquia con el uso de sistemas de información geográfica. UNADspa
dc.relation.referencesYang, J., Ma, X., Zhao, X., & Li, W. (2022). Spatiotemporal of the Coupling Relationship between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, Vol. 19, Page 12535, 19(19), 12535. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH191912535spa
dc.relation.referencesYee, S. H., Paulukonis, E., Simmons, C., Russell, M., Fulford, R., Harwell, L., & Smith, L. M. (2021). Projecting effects of land use change on human well-being through changes in ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 440, 109358. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2020.109358spa
dc.relation.referencesZambrano, I. N., Martínez, N. Y. Ñ., Vidal, L. G. B., & Fériz-García, D. A. (2021). Valoración sociocultural de servicios ecosistémicos a nivel local. Revista Novedades Colombianas, 16(1), 101–134spa
dc.relation.referencesZea-Gallego, J. I. (2020). Los territorios rurales en los tiempos de la globalización: entre los modelos formulados y la realidad observada caso de estudio: Suroeste Antioqueño. (Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Colombia)spa
dc.relation.referencesZemanova, M. A., Perotto-Baldivieso, H. L., Dickins, E. L., Gill, A. B., Leonard, J. P., & Wester, D. B. (2017). Impact of deforestation on habitat connectivity thresholds for large carnivores in tropical forests. Ecological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-017-0089-1spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc710 - Planificación del área y arquitectura del paisaje::714 - Las características del agua en la arquitectura del paisajespa
dc.subject.ddc710 - Planificación del área y arquitectura del paisaje::719 - Paisajes naturalesspa
dc.subject.lembEcosistemas
dc.subject.lembDiversidad biológica
dc.subject.lembDeforestación
dc.subject.lembCambio climático
dc.subject.proposalBiodiversidadspa
dc.subject.proposaldeforestaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalecosistemasspa
dc.subject.proposalretención de sedimentosspa
dc.subject.proposalcaptura de carbonospa
dc.subject.proposalprovisión de alimentosspa
dc.subject.proposalprovisión de aguaspa
dc.subject.proposalInVESTspa
dc.subject.proposalGeoDaspa
dc.titleServicios ecosistémicos y bienestar humano: Servicios de regulación y abastecimiento para la población del Suroeste Antioqueño, bajo un contexto de cambio climáticospa
dc.title.translatedEcosystem services and human well-being: Regulation and supply services for the population of southwestern Antioquia, in a context of climate changeeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1059713616.2025.pdf
Tamaño:
4.71 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Urbano Regionales del ingeniero forestal Marlon Alejandro Tejada Ladino
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Estudios Urbano - Regionales