Estudio de costo-efectividad de lenalidomida como terapia de mantenimiento posterior a trasplante autólogo de progenitores hematopoyéticos en pacientes con mieloma múltiple

dc.contributor.advisorCañón, Oscar
dc.contributor.advisorBuitrago, Giancarlo
dc.contributor.authorSánchez García, Víctor Leonardo
dc.contributor.orcidSanchez Garcia, Victor [000000030550530X]spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-30T20:24:09Z
dc.date.available2024-07-30T20:24:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.descriptionilustraciones, diagramasspa
dc.description.abstractEl mieloma múltiple es una neoplasia de células plasmáticas que se origina principalmente en la médula ósea, es la segunda neoplasia hematológica más común, en rasgos generales el tratamiento tiene una fase inducción, una de consolidación y una de mantenimiento, esta última se utiliza generalmente hasta la progresión, la lenalidomida es el medicamento estándar en el escenario post-trasplante sin embargo tiene un alto costo, el objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar la costo-efectividad del mantenimiento post-trasplante con lenalidomida en pacientes con mieloma múltiple. En este estudio se realizó una busqueda sistemática para obtener los datos de efectividad de las intervenciones, posteriormente se realizo el calculo de los costos asociados a la adquisición y administración de los medicamentos y los efectos adversos más frecuentes, para finalmente calcular la razon incremental de costo-efectividad para cada alternativa. La lenalidomida fue la terapia mas efectiva sin embargo fue tambien más costosa con un razon incremental de costo efectividad de $319´622.212 por año de vida ganado y $333’155.871 por años de vida ajustado por calidad (QALY). Con el precio de adquisición actual la lenalidomida no es costo-efectiva para el sistema de salud colombiano si se utiliza el umbral recomendado por la OMS (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractMultiple myeloma is a plasma cell neoplasm that originates mainly in the bone marrow, it is the second most common hematological neoplasm, in general terms the treatment has an induction phase, a consolidation phase and a maintenance phase, the latter is generally used until progression, lenalidomide is the standard drug in the post-transplant scenario, however it has a high cost, the objective of this work is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of post-transplant maintenance with lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma. In this study, a systematic search was carried out to obtain data on the effectiveness of the interventions, then the costs associated with the acquisition and administration of the drugs and the most frequent adverse effects were calculated, to finally calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each alternative. Lenalidomide was the most effective therapy; however, it was also the most expensive with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $319'622,212 per life-year gained and $333'155,871 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). 8 At the current acquisition price, lenalidomide is not cost-effective for the Colombian health system if the threshold recommended by the WHO is used.eng
dc.description.degreelevelEspecialidades Médicasspa
dc.description.degreenameEspecialista en Hematologíaspa
dc.description.methodsLa información de efectividad y efectos adversos se obtendrá de los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados. Los costos de los medicamentos se obtendrán a partir de las circulares de la comisión Nacional de precios de medicamentos y dispositivos médicos y del Sistema de Información de Precios de medicamentos (SISMED). Los costos de los dispositivos, procedimientos e insumos se obtendrán del manual tarifario ISS 2001 ajustados por inflación, se incluirán únicamente los servicios cuya frecuencia de uso cambie según el comparador.spa
dc.format.extent94 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86657
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Hematologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesCowan AJ, Green DJ, Kwok M, Lee S, Coffey DG, Holmberg LA, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Myeloma: A Review. JAMA. 1 de febrero de 2022;327(5):464-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesKazandjian D. Multiple myeloma epidemiology and survival, a unique malignancy. Semin Oncol. diciembre de 2016;43(6):676-81spa
dc.relation.references170-colombia-fact-sheets.pdf [Internet]. [citado 26 de noviembre de 2023]. Disponible en: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/170-colombia-fact-sheets.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesRafae A, van Rhee F, Al Hadidi S. Perspectives on the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. The Oncologist. 23 de noviembre de 2023;oyad306spa
dc.relation.referencesChen N, Zhou S, Palmisano M. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lenalidomide. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1 de febrero de 2017;56(2):139-52spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, Hurd DD, Hassoun H, Richardson PG, et al. Lenalidomide after Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 10 de mayo de 2012;366(19):1770-81spa
dc.relation.referencesPalumbo A, Cavallo F, Gay F, Di Raimondo F, Ben Yehuda D, Petrucci MT, et al. Autologous Transplantation and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 4 de septiembre de 2014;371(10):895-905spa
dc.relation.referencesAttal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Marit G, Caillot D, Moreau P, Facon T, et al. Lenalidomide Maintenance after Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 10 de mayo de 2012;366(19):1782-91spa
dc.relation.referencesJackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 1 de enero de 2019;20(1):57-73spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCarthy PL, Holstein SA, Petrucci MT, Richardson PG, Hulin C, Tosi P, et al. Lenalidomide Maintenance After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 10 de octubre de 2017;35(29):3279-89spa
dc.relation.referencesWang Y, Yang F, Shen Y, Zhang W, Wang J, Chang VT, et al. Maintenance Therapy With Immunomodulatory Drugs in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 18 de noviembre de 2015;108(3):djv342spa
dc.relation.referencesNeumann E by PJ, Sanders GD, Russell LB, Siegel JE, Ganiats and TG, editores. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Second Edition, New to this Edition:, Second Edition, New to this Edition: Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2016. 536 pspa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Bank Open Data [Internet]. [citado 2 de diciembre de 2023]. World Bank Open Data. Disponible en: https://data.worldbank.orgspa
dc.relation.referencesLey. Ley Estatutaria No 1751. Gac 056 [Internet]. 16 de febrero de 2015; Disponible en: http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/leyes-de-la-republicaspa
dc.relation.referencesBenavidez AP. P44 Multiple Myeloma Total Direct Costs in Colombia: A National Cohort Study Based on Administrative Claims Databasesspa
dc.relation.referencesOlry de Labry Lima A, Gimeno-Ballester V, Ríos Tamayo R, Epstein D, Matas Hoces A, Ríos Sánchez E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma who have undergone autologous transplant of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. noviembre de 2019;54(11):1908-19spa
dc.relation.referencesUyl‐de Groot CA, Ramsden R, Lee D, Boersma J, Zweegman S, Dhanasiri S. Lenalidomide as maintenance treatment for patients with multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation: A pharmaco‐economic assessment. Eur J Haematol. noviembre de 2020;105(5):635-45spa
dc.relation.referencesLeBlanc R, Hollmann S, Tay J. Canadian cost analysis comparing maintenance therapy with bortezomib versus lenalidomide for patients with multiple myeloma post autologous stem cell transplant. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol [Internet]. 2016 [citado 27 de noviembre de 2023];23(1). Disponible en: https://jptcp.comspa
dc.relation.referencesSH S, E C, NL H, ES J, SA P, H S, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues [Internet]. [citado 30 de noviembre de 2023]. Disponible en: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Classification-Of-Tumours/WHO-Classification-Of-Tumours-Of-Haematopoietic-And-Lymphoid-Tissues-2017spa
dc.relation.referencesShort KD, Rajkumar S, Larson D, Buadi F, Hayman S, Dispenzieri A, et al. Incidence of extramedullary disease in patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapy, and the activity of pomalidomide on extramedullary myeloma. Leukemia. junio de 2011;25(6):906-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesRajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(5):548-67spa
dc.relation.referencesCurado MP, Oliveira MM, Silva DRM, Souza DLB. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma in 17 Latin American countries: an update. Cancer Med. 1 de mayo de 2018;7(5):2101-8spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, et al. Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 20 de julio de 2017;3(1):1-20spa
dc.relation.referencesPalumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 17 de marzo de 2011;364(11):1046-60spa
dc.relation.referencesKyle RA, Larson DR, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Cerhan JR, et al. Long-Term Follow-up of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. N Engl J Med. 18 de enero de 2018;378(3):241-9spa
dc.relation.referencesvan Nieuwenhuijzen N, Spaan I, Raymakers R, Peperzak V. From MGUS to Multiple Myeloma, a Paradigm for Clonal Evolution of Premalignant Cells. Cancer Res. 14 de mayo de 2018;78(10):2449-56spa
dc.relation.referencesRajan AM, Rajkumar SV. Interpretation of cytogenetic results in multiple myeloma for clinical practice. Blood Cancer J. 1 de octubre de 2015;5(10):e365-e365.spa
dc.relation.referencesHideshima T, Mitsiades C, Tonon G, Richardson PG, Anderson KC. Understanding multiple myeloma pathogenesis in the bone marrow to identify new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer. 1 de agosto de 2007;7(8):585-98spa
dc.relation.referencesGhobrial IM, Detappe A, Anderson KC, Steensma DP. The bone-marrow niche in MDS and MGUS: implications for AML and MM. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 1 de abril de 2018;15(4):219-33.spa
dc.relation.referencesBianchi G, Munshi NC. Pathogenesis beyond the cancer clone(s) in multiple myeloma. Blood. 14 de mayo de 2015;125(20):3049-58.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaubach J. Multiple myeloma: Clinical features, laboratory manifestations, and diagnosis - UpToDate [Internet] [Internet]. [citado 13 de agosto de 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/multiple-myeloma-clinical-features-laboratory-manifestations-and-diagnosis?search=mieloma&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1spa
dc.relation.referencesKyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, Lust JA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Review of 1027 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 1 de enero de 2003;78(1):21-33.spa
dc.relation.referencesHillengass J, Usmani S, Rajkumar SV, Durie BGM, Mateos MV, Lonial S, et al. International myeloma working group consensus recommendations on imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Lancet Oncol. 1 de junio de 2019;20(6):e302-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesRajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 1 de noviembre de 2014;15(12):e538-48.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalker BA, Mavrommatis K, Wardell CP, Ashby TC, Bauer M, Davies F, et al. A high-risk, Double-Hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis. Leukemia. 1 de enero de 2019;33(1):159-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesPalumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, et al. Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 10 de septiembre de 2015;33(26):2863-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesRafae A, van Rhee F, Al Hadidi S. Perspectives on the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. The Oncologist. 1 de marzo de 2024;29(3):200-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesPalumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos MV, Larocca A, Facon T, Kumar SK, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 26 de marzo de 2015;125(13):2068-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesAttal Michel, Lauwers-Cances Valerie, Hulin Cyrille, Leleu Xavier, Caillot Denis, Escoffre Martine, et al. Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 376(14):1311-20.spa
dc.relation.referencesStadtmauer EA, Pasquini MC, Blackwell B, Hari P, Bashey A, Devine S, et al. Autologous Transplantation, Consolidation, and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Results of the BMT CTN 0702 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 1 de marzo de 2019;37(7):589-97spa
dc.relation.referencesHari P, Pasquini MC, Stadtmauer EA, Fraser R, Fei M, Devine SM, et al. Long-term follow-up of BMT CTN 0702 (STaMINA) of postautologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) strategies in the upfront treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). J Clin Oncol. 20 de mayo de 2020;38(15_suppl):8506-8506spa
dc.relation.referencesCavo M, Gay FM, Patriarca F, Zamagni E, Montefusco V, Dozza L, et al. Double Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Significantly Prolongs Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Comparison with Single Autotransplantation in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of Phase 3 EMN02/HO95 Study. Blood. 8 de diciembre de 2017;130:401.spa
dc.relation.referencesRajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple myeloma current treatment algorithms. Blood Cancer J. 28 de septiembre de 2020;10(9):94spa
dc.relation.referencesGiralt S, Costa LJ, Maloney D, Krishnan A, Fei M, Antin JH, et al. Tandem Autologous-Autologous versus Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Long-Term Follow-Up Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 0102 Trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1 de abril de 2020;26(4):798-804.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreau P, Attal M, Hulin C, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Benboubker L, et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 6 de julio de 2019;394(10192):29-38spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreau P, Hulin C, Perrot A, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Benboubker L, et al. Maintenance with daratumumab or observation following treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and autologous stem-cell transplant in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 1 de octubre de 2021;22(10):1378-90spa
dc.relation.referencesSonneveld Pieter, Dimopoulos Meletios A., Boccadoro Mario, Quach Hang, Ho P. Joy, Beksac Meral, et al. Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 24 de enero de 2024;390(4):301-13spa
dc.relation.referencesSengsayadeth S, Malard F, Savani BN, Garderet L, Mohty M. Posttransplant maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: the changing landscape. Blood Cancer J. marzo de 2017;7(3):e545spa
dc.relation.referencesSonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Beksac M, van der Holt B, Aquino S, Ludwig H, et al. Consolidation and Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 10 de noviembre de 2021;39(32):3613-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesNooka AK, Joseph NS. Maintenance Strategies for Myeloma: Is Bigger Always Better? Cancer J. mayo de 2021;27(3):231-8spa
dc.relation.referencesAttal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, Doyen C, Hulin C, Benboubker L, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 15 de noviembre de 2006;108(10):3289-94spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan GJ, Gregory WM, Davies FE, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Brown JM, et al. The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis. Blood. 5 de enero de 2012;119(1):7-15spa
dc.relation.referencesKagoya Y, Nannya Y, Kurokawa M. Thalidomide maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: Meta-analysis. Leuk Res. 1 de agosto de 2012;36(8):1016-21spa
dc.relation.referencesRichardson PG, Laubach J, Gandolfi S, Facon T, Weisel K, O’Gorman P. Maintenance and continuous therapy for multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 3 de agosto de 2018;18(8):751-64spa
dc.relation.referencesGay F, Jackson G, Rosiñol L, Holstein SA, Moreau P, Spada S, et al. Maintenance Treatment and Survival in Patients With Myeloma. JAMA Oncol. octubre de 2018;4(10):1389-97spa
dc.relation.referencesRajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 1 de enero de 2016;91(1):101-19spa
dc.relation.referencesMikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, Costello C, Dhodapkar MV, Kumar S, et al. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 10 de mayo de 2019;37(14):1228-63spa
dc.relation.referencesSonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf IGH, van der Holt B, el Jarari L, Bertsch U, Salwender H, et al. Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Randomized Phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 20 de agosto de 2012;30(24):2946-55spa
dc.relation.referencesRosiñol L, Oriol A, Teruel AI, Hernández D, López-Jiménez J, de la Rubia J, et al. Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretransplantation therapy in multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study. Blood. 23 de agosto de 2012;120(8):1589-96spa
dc.relation.referencesDimopoulos MA, Gay F, Schjesvold F, Beksac M, Hajek R, Weisel KC, et al. Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 19 de enero de 2019;393(10168):253-64spa
dc.relation.referencesNational Comprehensive Cancer. Multiple Myeloma Version 3.2024 [Internet]. 2024. Disponible en: NCCN.orgspa
dc.relation.referencesDimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, Mateos MV, Zweegman S, Cook G, et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 1 de marzo de 2021;32(3):309-22spa
dc.relation.referencesFacon T, Kumar SK, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MAIA): overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 1 de noviembre de 2021;22(11):1582-96spa
dc.relation.referencesFacon Thierry, Kumar Shaji, Plesner Torben, Orlowski Robert Z., Moreau Philippe, Bahlis Nizar, et al. Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 30 de mayo de 2019;380(22):2104-15spa
dc.relation.referencesDurie BGM, Hoering A, Abidi MH, Rajkumar SV, Epstein J, Kahanic SP, et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 4 de febrero de 2017;389(10068):519-27spa
dc.relation.referencesDurie BGM, Hoering A, Sexton R, Abidi MH, Epstein J, Rajkumar SV, et al. Longer term follow-up of the randomized phase III trial SWOG S0777: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients (Pts) with previously untreated multiple myeloma without an intent for immediate autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Blood Cancer J. 11 de mayo de 2020;10(5):53spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos María-Victoria, Dimopoulos Meletios A., Cavo Michele, Suzuki Kenshi, Jakubowiak Andrzej, Knop Stefan, et al. Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 8 de febrero de 2018;378(6):518-28spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos MV, Cavo M, Blade J, Dimopoulos MA, Suzuki K, Jakubowiak A, et al. Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALCYONE): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 11 de enero de 2020;395(10218):132-41spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 1 de agosto de 2016;17(8):e328-46spa
dc.relation.referencesGoel U, Charalampous C, Kapoor P, Binder M, Buadi FK, Dingli D, et al. Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to standard dose vs low dose lenalidomide. Blood Cancer J. 26 de marzo de 2024;14(1):55.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson KC, Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV, Stewart AK, Weber D, Richardson P, et al. Clinically relevant end points and new drug approvals for myeloma. Leukemia. 1 de febrero de 2008;22(2):231-9spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar S, Baizer L, Callander NS, Giralt SA, Hillengass J, Freidlin B, et al. Gaps and opportunities in the treatment of relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma: Consensus recommendations of the NCI Multiple Myeloma Steering Committee. Blood Cancer J. 29 de junio de 2022;12(6):98spa
dc.relation.referencesKastritis E, Roussou M, Gavriatopoulou M, Kanellias N, Migkou M, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E, et al. Impact of last lenalidomide dose, duration, and IMiD-free interval in patients with myeloma treated with pomalidomide/dexamethasone. Blood Adv. 10 de diciembre de 2019;3(23):4095-103spa
dc.relation.referencesRajkumar SV. Multiple Myeloma: 2022 update on Diagnosis, Risk-stratification and Management. Am J Hematol. agosto de 2022;97(8):1086-107spa
dc.relation.referencesMorgan GJ, Child JA, Gregory WM, Szubert AJ, Cocks K, Bell SE, et al. Effects of zoledronic acid versus clodronic acid on skeletal morbidity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 1 de agosto de 2011;12(8):743-52spa
dc.relation.referencesRaje N, Terpos E, Willenbacher W, Shimizu K, García-Sanz R, Durie B, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 1 de marzo de 2018;19(3):370-81spa
dc.relation.referencesDrummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance and GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Fourth Edition, Fourth Edition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. 464 pspa
dc.relation.referencesBriggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher and M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. 256 p. (Handbooks in Health Economic Evaluation)spa
dc.relation.referencesZhou ZY, Parikh K, Chai X, Rokito A, Udeze C, Xie J, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lenalidomide for Maintenance Therapy after Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients: A United States Payer Perspective. Blood. 29 de noviembre de 2018;132:3535spa
dc.relation.referencesProskorovsky I, Lewis P, Williams CD, Jordan K, Kyriakou C, Ishak J, et al. Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 to EQ-5D in patients with multiple myeloma. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 11 de marzo de 2014;12(1):35spa
dc.relation.referencesIino H, Hashiguchi M, Hori S. Estimating the range of incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare based on willingness to pay and GDP per capita: A systematic review. PLOS ONE. 14 de abril de 2022;17(4):e0266934.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaunheim KS, Platz JJ. Integrating Advocacy into Your Practice. Thorac Surg Clin. 1 de febrero de 2024;34(1):77-84spa
dc.relation.referencesSmeele NVR, Chorus CG, Schermer MHN, de Bekker-Grob EW. Towards machine learning for moral choice analysis in health economics: A literature review and research agenda. Soc Sci Med. 1 de junio de 2023;326:115910spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::616 - Enfermedadesspa
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medicina y salud::615 - Farmacología y terapéuticaspa
dc.subject.decsMieloma Múltiplespa
dc.subject.decsMultiple Myelomaeng
dc.subject.decsPlasmacitomaspa
dc.subject.decsPlasmacytomaeng
dc.subject.decsLenalidomidaspa
dc.subject.decsLenalidomideeng
dc.subject.decsNeoplasiasspa
dc.subject.decsNeoplasmseng
dc.subject.proposalMantenimiento post-trasplantespa
dc.subject.proposalCosto-efectividadspa
dc.subject.proposalCost-effectiveness analisiseng
dc.subject.proposalPost-transplant maintenanceeng
dc.titleEstudio de costo-efectividad de lenalidomida como terapia de mantenimiento posterior a trasplante autólogo de progenitores hematopoyéticos en pacientes con mieloma múltiplespa
dc.title.translatedCost-effectiveness study of lenalidomide as maintenance therapy after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myelomaeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Especialidad Médicaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
7187450.2024.pdf
Tamaño:
562.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Especialista en Hematología

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: