Uso del método científico en estudiantes de séptimo grado, mediante miniproyectos en salidas de campo

dc.contributor.advisorMontenegro Diaz, Olga Lucía
dc.contributor.authorNova Arias, Laura Milena
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T23:03:05Z
dc.date.available2021-08-27T23:03:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficos y tablasspa
dc.description.abstractLa enseñanza del método científico ha sido un amplio tema de discusión que a su vez cuenta con aproximaciones teóricas, epistemológicas y experimentales reportadas; sin embargo, en la mayoría de las ocasiones el proceso de investigación y reporte de resultados es algo tedioso para los estudiantes y no permite el acercamiento genuino de los estudiantes al proceso de investigación científica. El presente trabajo final buscó propiciar el desarrollo de competencias científicas en estudiantes de grado séptimo del Colegio Bilingüe Jose Max León mediante el desarrollo de miniproyectos de investigación siguiendo el método científico entorno a una salida de campo realizada en el Parque Natural Chicaque en el departamento de Cundinamarca, Colombia. Los estudiantes plantearon y ejecutaron sus miniproyectos de investigación mediante trabajo cooperativo y fueron guiados por la docente a través del aprendizaje basado en proyectos y el aprendizaje experiencial. Todo el proceso se dio en la segunda lengua inglés puesto que la asignatura Science cuenta con currículo bilingüe en la institución. Como producto de cada miniproyecto de investigación los estudiantes desarrollaron un reporte tipo artículo científico de manera grupal, cada estudiante empleo una libreta de campo personal, realizó una rutina de pensamiento y fue evaluado mediante pruebas diagnóstica en conceptos ecosistémicos de manera individual. Se obtuvo el desarrollo de competencias científicas de identificación, indagación, explicación, comunicación y trabajo en equipo, además del desarrollo de competencias sociales. Se encontró que las salidas de campo son el ambiente de aprendizaje propicio para el desarrollo de miniproyectos de investigación donde los estudiantes sigan de manera práctica el método científico y además permite una mejor apropiación conceptual disciplinar con respecto a la metodología tradicional desarrollada en el salón de clase como ambiente formal de aprendizaje.spa
dc.description.abstractScientific method teaching has been widely discussed and has some theoretical, epistemological, and experimental reported approaches; however, mostly the research and results report process turn out to be tedious and makes it hard for the students to get closer to scientific research process. The present Master degree work addresses the promotion of scientific competences development in Bilingüal School’s Jose Max Leon seventh grade students through the research mini-projects development following the scientific method around a field trip developed in Chicaque’s Natural Park in Colombian department of Cundinamarca... They raised and executed their research mini-projects through cooperative work and were guided by the teacher based on experiential learning and project based learning. All the process was carried out in English language because of the bilingüal curriculum of Science subject in the School. As the final product of each research mini-project the teams developed a written record in scientific article format. Each student used a personal field book, developed a thinking routine, and was assessed trough a diagnostic test and a final test on an individually way. The development of scientific competences of identification, inquiry, explanation, communication, and teamwork were obtained, besides the development of social competences. It was found that the field trips are the favorable learning environment to research mini-projects development where the students are able to follow the scientific method, also the field trips enable a better adoption of the disciplinary concepts with regard to traditional methods developed in classroom space as formal learning environment.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en enseñanza de las ciencias exactas y naturalesspa
dc.description.researchareaAmbientes educativos no formalesspa
dc.format.extent169 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80049
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentObservatorio Astronómico Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Cienciasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias - Maestría en Enseñanza de las Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesspa
dc.relation.referencesAyala, F., Ayala, F. J., Ayala, F. J., & Dobzhansky, T. (Eds.). (1974). Studies in the philosophy of biology: reduction and related problems. Univ of California Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBacon, F. (1960). The new organon and related writings.spa
dc.relation.referencesBricmont, J. (2014). Por qué no existe un método científico: y por qué eso no supone un problema. Mètode: Revista de difusión de la Investigación, (84), 38-43.spa
dc.relation.referencesChamberlin, T. C. (1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, 754-759.spa
dc.relation.referencesChona, G., Arteta, J., Martínez, S., Ibáñez, X., Pedraza, M., & Fonseca, G. (2006). ¿ Qué competencias científicas promovemos en el aula. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, 20, 62-79.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrake, S. (1978). Ptolemy, Galileo, and scientific method. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 9(2), 99-115.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrake, S. (1990). Galileo: Pioneer scientist. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFeyerabend, P. (1988). Against method (2nd ed.). London: Verso.spa
dc.relation.referencesFudge, D. S. (2014). Fifty years of JR Platts strong inference. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217(8), 1202-1204.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalilei, G. (1953). Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican. Univ of California Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGalilei, G. (1832). Opere (Vol. 2). Nicolò Bettoni.spa
dc.relation.referencesGower, B. (1997). Scientific method: An historical and philosophical introduction. Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaack, S., & Duica, W. (1997). Evidence and inquiry. Towards reconstruction in epistemology. Ideas y Valores, 46(104), 99-105.spa
dc.relation.referencesHempel, C. G. (1966). Criteria of confirmation and acceptability. C. Hempel. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall, 33-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiebel, H. (1964). History and Limitations of Scientific Method. University of Toronto Quarterly, 34(1), 15-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesMayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMEN, M. D. (2004). Estándares básicos de competencias en ciencias naturales y ciencias sociales. Santa Fe de Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesMEN, M. D. (2016). Derechos Básicos de Aprendizaje para el área de ciencias sociales. Bogotá: Panamericana Formas e Impresos S. A.spa
dc.relation.referencesODonohue, W., & Buchanan, J. A. (2001). The weaknesses of strong inference. Behavior and Philosophy, 1-20.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlatt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. science, 146(3642), 347-353.spa
dc.relation.referencesPopper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery.New York: Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesRandall, J. H. (1940). The development of scientific method in the school of Padua. Journal of the History of Ideas, 177-206.spa
dc.relation.referencesQuine, W. V. (1980). 0.[1953]:Two Dogmas of Empiricism. From a logical point of view, 20-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesTamayo, R. P. (2012). ¿ Existe el método científico? Historia y realidad: Historia y realidad. Fondo de cultura económica.spa
dc.relation.referencesVoit, E. O. (2019). Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method. PLoS computational biology, 15(9), e1007279.spa
dc.relation.referencesWagensberg, J. (2014). On the existence and uniqueness of the scientific method. Biological theory, 9(3), 331-346.spa
dc.relation.referencesBowen-Stevens, S. R., Cox, T. M., & Curran, M. C. (2011). What are bottlenose dolphins doing on land? An activity teaching the scientific method through the unique behavior of strand feeding. The american biology Teacher, 73(7), 407-411.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrooks-Young, S. (Ed.). (2006). Critical technology issues for school leaders. Corwin Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBehrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235-245.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchmann, M., & Schwille, J. (1983). Education: The overcoming of experience. American journal of Education, 92(1), 30-51.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuck, G. A. (2000). Teaching Science to English-as-Second-Language Learners: Teaching, learning, and assessment strategies for elementary ESL students. Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, 20.spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, R. H., Sibthorp, J., & Gookin, J. (2016). Developing ill-structured problem-solving skills through wilderness education. Journal of Experiential Education, 39(2), 179-195.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson, C., Ewert, A., & Chang, Y. (2016). Multiple methods for identifying outcomes of a high challenge adventure activity. Journal of Experiential Education, 39(2), 164-178.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human relations, 2(2), 129-152.spa
dc.relation.referencesDewey, J. (1986, September). Experience and education. In The educational forum (Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 241-252). Taylor & Francis Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesGillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian journal of teacher education, 41(3), 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerreira, J. G. (2011). Teaching Life Sciences to English second language learners: What do teachers do?. South African Journal of Education, 31(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesFung, D. (2020). Teaching Science Through Home and Second Languages as the Medium of Instruction: a Comparative Analysis of Junior Secondary Science Classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-26.spa
dc.relation.referencesHammer, D., Russ, R., Mikeska, J., & Scherr, R. (2008). Identifying inquiry and conceptualizing students’ abilities. In Teaching scientific inquiry (pp. 138-156). Brill Sense.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, Y. C. (2020). The Effects of Elementary Students Science Learning in CLIL. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 1-15.spa
dc.relation.referencesIsaak, J., Devine, M., Gervich, C., & Gottschall, R. (2018). Are we experienced? Reflections on the SUNY experiential learning mandate. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(1), 23-38.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational researcher, 38(5), 365-379.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1999). El aprendizaje cooperativo en el aula.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 89(1), 47.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, B. F., Rasmussen, C. M., & Moffitt, M. C. (1997). Real-life problem solving.: A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.spa
dc.relation.referencesKolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesKolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrepel, W. J., & DuVall, C. R. (1981). Field trips: A guide for planning and conducting educational experiences. National Education Association.spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, M. A. (2017). International service-learning: Rethinking the role of emotions. Journal of Experiential Education, 40, 279–294.spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsson, P. N. & Jakobsson, A. (2020). Meaning-making in science from the perspective of students’ hybrid language use. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 811–830.spa
dc.relation.referencesLou, Y., Abrami, P., Spence, J., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458.spa
dc.relation.referencesLou, Y., Abrami, P., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449-521.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcPherson, G. R. (2001). Teaching & learning the scientific method. The American Biology Teacher, 63(4), 242-245.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiettinen, R. (1998). About the legacy of experiential learning. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 3(3), 165-171.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorales, D. A. (2018). La salida de campo como recurso didáctico para enseñar ciencias. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 3103-3103.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064-1077.spa
dc.relation.referencesMujica Rodríguez, A. M. (2012). Aprendizaje por proyectos: Una vía al fortalecimiento de los semilleros de investigación. Docencia Universitaria, 13, 201–216.spa
dc.relation.referencesMunge, B., Thomas, G., & Heck, D. (2018). Outdoor fieldwork in higher education: Learning from multidisciplinary experience. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(1), 39-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesNabors, M.L., Edwards, L.C., & Murray, R.K. (2009). Making the case for field trips:What research tells us and what site coordinators have to say. Education 129(4), 661-667.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrion, N. (2007). A holistic approach for science education for all. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(2), 111-118.spa
dc.relation.referencesPace, S., & Tesi, R. (2004). Adults Perception of Field Trips Taken within Grades K-12: Eight Case Studies in the New York Metropolitan Area. Education, 125(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesPascagaza, E. F., & Bohórquez, B. G. (2019). El Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos y su relación con el desarrollo de competencias asociadas al trabajo colaborativo. Amauta, 17(33), 103-118.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (1970). La evolución intelectual entre la adolescencia y la edad adulta. J. Delval (Comp.), Lecturas de psicología del niño, 2(02), 208-213.spa
dc.relation.referencesPipitone, J. M. (2018). Place as pedagogy: Toward study abroad for social change. Journal of Experiential Education, 41, 54–74.spa
dc.relation.referencesPowner, L. C. (2006). Teaching the scientific method in the active learning classroom. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(3), 521-524.spa
dc.relation.referencesSanmarti Puig, N., & Márquez Bargalló, C. (2017). Aprendizaje de las ciencias basado en proyectos: del contexto a la acción. Apice, 1(1), 3-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchaffer C 2007. Teaching science to English as a second language students.spa
dc.relation.referencesSlavin, R. E., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Aprendizaje cooperativo: teoría, investigación y práctica. Argentina: Aique.spa
dc.relation.referencesTal, T., & Morag, O. (2009). Reflective practice as a means for preparing to teach outdoors in an ecological garden. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 245-262.spa
dc.relation.referencesTang, X., Coffey, J. E., Elby, A., & Levin, D. M. (2010). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning. Science education, 94(1), 29-47.spa
dc.relation.referencesTate, P. J. (Ed.). (1978). Learning by Experience-What, Why, how Morris T. Keeton, Pamela J. Tate Editors. Jossey-Bass.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillden, J. L., Crowther, D. T., Gubanich, A. A., & Cannon, J. R. (2002). A Quantitative Comparison of Instruction Format of Undergraduate Introductory Level Content Biology Courses: Traditional Lecture Approach vs. Inquiry Based for Education Majors.spa
dc.relation.referencesÇenberci, S. (2018). Investigation of the Effectiveness of Scientific Research Methods Course in Terms of Academic Dishonesty Tendencies. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(11), 2453-2460.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc370 - Educación::373 - Educación secundariaspa
dc.subject.proposalMétodo científicospa
dc.subject.proposalScientific methodeng
dc.subject.proposalScience teachingeng
dc.subject.proposalEnseñanza de las cienciasspa
dc.subject.proposalSalida de campospa
dc.subject.proposalField tripeng
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje experiencialspa
dc.subject.proposalExperiential learningeng
dc.titleUso del método científico en estudiantes de séptimo grado, mediante miniproyectos en salidas de campospa
dc.title.translatedScientific method use in seventh grade students, trough miniprojects develop in field trips
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
10324710972021.pdf
Tamaño:
2.54 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesís de Maestría en Enseñanza de las Ciencias Exactas y Naturales

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: