Transformación digital y desempeño organizacional en empresas del sector de energía eléctrica

dc.contributor.advisorPeña, José Ismaelspa
dc.contributor.authorRosero Garcia, Javierspa
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupElectrical Machines & Drives, EM&Dspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-24T04:37:56Zspa
dc.date.available2020-07-24T04:37:56Zspa
dc.date.issued2019-02-01spa
dc.description.abstractEste documento presenta el resultado de la investigación acerca de la relación entre las nuevas tecnologías digitales asociadas a Transformación Digital y el Desempeño de las organizaciones. Se establece la relación a través de la construcción de un modelo conceptual basado en una revisión sistemática de la literatura (RSL) en la teoría de Capacidades Dinámicas (DC) y la contribución de algunas metodologías, experimentos y validaciones de teorías de visión basadas en recursos (RBV) y de visión basada en conocimiento (KBV). Este estudio incluye el marco teórico de los temas asociados a la temática planteada, la revisión sistemática de la literatura (RSL), el diseño de modelo conceptual e hipótesis, la realización de encuesta y análisis, validación del modelo y el análisis de resultados. Además, se identifican los factores que fomentan los cambios digitales en las organizaciones y que permitan aprovechar la transformación digital donde se busca optimizar los procesos basados en datos, logrando generar valor en los negocios y en la toma de decisiones. El estudio permite concluir que los procesos de las organizaciones funcionan como fenómenos que tienen realidades objetivas, que se pueden expresar en relaciones causales y medirse por medio de datos, en muchas ocasiones en tiempo real, y que producen conocimiento como elemento clave en la generación de valor en las organizaciones. El modelo desarrollado permite identificar la relación de la transformación digital y el desempeño organizacional que se representa a través de relaciones entre los conceptos independientes y dependientes de las organizaciones, donde es posible evaluar la contribución y fiabilidad de cada constructo e hipótesis establecida.spa
dc.description.abstractThis document presents the result of the research about the relationship between the new digital technologies associated with Digital Transformation and the Performance of organizations. Relationship determined through the construction of a conceptual model based on a systematic literature review, in the theory of Dynamic Capabilities (DC) and the contribution of some methodologies, experiments and analyzed validations of resource-based vision theories (RBV) and knowledge based vision (KBV). The research includes the conceptual recapitulation in the theoretical framework of the topics associated with the proposed theme, the systematic review of the literature (RSL), the design of the conceptual model and hypothesis, the conduct of a survey and analysis, the validation of the model and the analysis of results. As main results, it is shown that research has paid little attention to the factors that encourage or hinder digital and technological changes in organizations, to take advantage of digital transformation and especially big data analytics. However, today's companies seek to optimize data-based processes, generating value in business and decision making. It is concluded, that the processes of organizations function, as phenomena that have objective realities, which can be expressed in causal relationships and measured by means of data, on many occasions in real time, that produce knowledge as a key element in the generation of value in the organizations With which, and through the model developed, it is possible to identify that, digital transformation and organizational performance can be represented through relationships between independent and dependent variables of organizations, in which it is possible to evaluate the contribution and reliability of each variable in the constructs and hypotheses established for each causal relationship.spa
dc.description.additionalMagíster en Administración de Empresas. Línea de Investigación: Estrategia y Organizaciones.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.format.extent126spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77839
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Públicaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administraciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAdrian, C., Abdullah, R., Atan, R., & Jusoh, Y. Y. (2018). Conceptual Model Development of Big Data Analytics Implementation Assessment Effect on Decision-Making. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, InPress(InPress), 1. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2018.03.001spa
dc.relation.referencesAlsaig, A., Alagar, V., & Ormandjieva, O. (2018). A Critical Analysis of the V-Model of Big Data. 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/ 12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), 1809–1813. https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom/BigDataSE.2018.00273spa
dc.relation.referencesAmit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105spa
dc.relation.referencesAnand, B., & Krishna, K. (2019). Overcoming Hurdles to Accelerate Data-Centric Ways of Working in the Energy Industry. In Offshore Technology Conference (Vol. 2019-May). Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/29446-MSspa
dc.relation.referencesAnand, N., & Barsoux, J.-L. (2017). What Everyone Gets Wrong About Change Management: EBSCOhost. Harvard Business Review.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411spa
dc.relation.referencesAndriushchenko, K., Buriachenko, A., Rozhko, O., Lavruk, O., Skok, P., Hlushchenko, Y., … Kondarevych, V. (2020). Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2255–2270. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(53)spa
dc.relation.referencesAono, K., Lajnef, N., Faridazar, F., & Chakrabartty, S. (2016). Infrastructural health monitoring using self-powered Internet-of-Things. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (pp. 2058–2061). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2016.7538983spa
dc.relation.referencesArgote, L. (2012). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media.spa
dc.relation.referencesAshrafi, N., Kelleher, L., & Kuilboer, J. P. (2014). The impact of business intelligence on healthcare delivery in the USA. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 9, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.28945/1993spa
dc.relation.referencesBagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-xspa
dc.relation.referencesBarney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, (11(3)), 656–665.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarney, Jay B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805spa
dc.relation.referencesBraganza, A., Brooks, L., Nepelski, D., Ali, M., & Moro, R. (2017). Resource management in big data initiatives: Processes and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.006spa
dc.relation.referencesBriceño Moreno, M. de los Á., & Bernal Torres, C. A. (2010). Estudios de Caso Sobre La Gestión Del Conocimiento en Cuatro Organizaciones Colombianas Líderes en Penetración de Mercado. Estudios Gerenciales, 26(117), 173–193. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21218551009spa
dc.relation.referencesBrous, P., Janssen, M., & Herder, P. (2019). Internet of Things adoption for reconfiguring decision-making processes in asset management. Business Process Management Journal, 25(3), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0328spa
dc.relation.referencesBuono, A. F., & Kerber, K. W. (2010). Intervention and Organizational Change: Building Organizational Change Capacity. EBS Review,.spa
dc.relation.referencesBustos Martínez, E., Carrasco Sagredo, C., & Bull, M. T. (2018). Propuesta metodológica para implementar la primera fase del modelo de gestión del cambio organizacional de Lewin. Methodological Proposal to Implement the First Stage of Lewin’s Organizational Change Management.spa
dc.relation.referencesByrne, B. M. (2012). Testing the Factorial Validity of Scores From a Measuring Instrument First-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model. Structural Equation Modeling With Mplus. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935842spa
dc.relation.referencesCamisón, C., & Forés, B. (2010). New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesCéspedes, R., Rosero, J., Montaño, W., & Reyes, J. F. (2017). Methodology for defining the functionality of advanced measurement infraestructure in Colombia. 2017 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference - Latin America, ISGT Latin America 2017, 2017-Janua, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-LA.2017.8126745spa
dc.relation.referencesCha, K. J., & Cha, J. S. (2014). Information Technology Enabled Organizational Transformation: Toward an Integrative Theoretical Framework. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 9(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2014.9.2.11spa
dc.relation.referencesChandler, a D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American enterprise. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, 349–407.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, B., Wan, J., Shu, L., Li, P., Mukherjee, M., & Yin, B. (2017). Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: Key Technologies, Application Case, and Challenges. IEEE Access, 6, 6505–6519. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.007spa
dc.relation.referencesCianni, Mary, and Steven Steckler. (2017). Transforming organizations to a digital world. People & Strategy, Spring, 14.spa
dc.relation.referencesConner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorrea Ospina, Martha Liliana; Díaz Pinzón, B. H. (2018). Capacidad en tecnologías de la información y desempeño organizacional : un estudio en. Innovar, 28, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v28n69.71spa
dc.relation.referencesCôrte-Real, N., Oliveira, T., & Ruivo, P. (2017). Assessing business value of Big Data Analytics in European firms. Journal of Business Research, 70, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.011spa
dc.relation.referencesDery, K., Sebastian, I. M., & van der Meulen, N. (2017). The Digital Workplace is Key to Digital Innovation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(2), 135–152. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=123370531&lang=es&site=ehost-livespa
dc.relation.referencesDonate, M. J., & de Pablo, J. D. S. (2015). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of Business Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they. European Business Review, 31(1), 25–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-03-2018-0060spa
dc.relation.referencesEmily Coyne, Joshua Coyne, Kenton Walker. (2018). Big Data Information Governance by Accountants. Journal of the American Health Information Management Association, 88(3), 28–29.spa
dc.relation.referencesErevelles, S., Fukawa, N., & Swayne, L. (2016). Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.001spa
dc.relation.referencesFatás Juberías, E., & Roig Cotanda, J. (2004). Una introducción a la metodología experimental en economía. Cuadernos de Economía: Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance, 27(75), 7–36.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández-Caramés, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2018). A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 6, 32979–33001. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2842685spa
dc.relation.referencesFilippini, R., Güttel, W. H., & Nosella, A. (2012). Ambidexterity and the evolution of knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Business Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (2012). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and MeasurementError. Journal of Marketing Research, 66(1), 37–39.spa
dc.relation.referencesFosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., & de Bourmont, M. (2019). Quality dominant logic in big data analytics and firm performance. Business Process Management Journal, 25(3), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2017-0218spa
dc.relation.referencesGalvez Martinez, A. C., Casteneda Cuellar, M., & Tarazona Bermudez, G. M. (2017). Integration Model of Business Intelligence and Knowledge Management. Redes de Ingeniería - Rompiendo Las Barreras Del Conocimiento, 109–118.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrößler, A., & Grübner, A. (2006). An empirical model of the relationships between manufacturing capabilities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management (Vol. 26). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610659865spa
dc.relation.referencesGunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Wamba, S. F., Childe, S. J., Hazen, B., & Akter, S. (2017). Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.004spa
dc.relation.referencesGupta, M., & George, J. F. (2016). Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Information & Management, 53(8), 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004spa
dc.relation.referencesHenseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(2009), 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014spa
dc.relation.referencesHill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. (1995). Strategic management: An integrated approach. Mass: Houghton Mifflin Co.spa
dc.relation.referencesHofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1980). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. West Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesJenatabadi, H. S. (2015). An Overview of Organizational Performance Index: Definitions and Measurements The electrochemical capacitive behavior of polymer-based nanocomposites View project An Overview of Organizational Performance Index: Definitions and Measurements. RessearchGate, (May), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4298.3849spa
dc.relation.referencesJi-fan Ren, S., Fosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Modelling quality dynamics, business value and firm performance in a big data analytics environment. International Journal of Production Research, 55(17), 5011–5026. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154209spa
dc.relation.referencesKafel, P., & Casadesus, M. (2016). The order and level of management standards implementation. The TQM Journal.spa
dc.relation.referencesKodama, M. (2006). Knowledge-based view of corporate strategy. Technovation, 26(12), 1390–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.08.006spa
dc.relation.referencesKoo, D., Piratla, K., & Matthews, C. J. (2015). Towards Sustainable Water Supply: Schematic Development of Big Data Collection Using Internet of Things (IoT). Procedia Engineering, 118, 489–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.465spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, W., Liu, K., Belitski, M., Ghobadian, A., & O’Regan, N. (2016). e-Leadership through strategic alignment: An empirical study of small- and medium-sized enterprises in the digital age. Journal of Information Technology, 31(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.10spa
dc.relation.referencesLom, M., Pribyl, O., & Svitek, M. (2016). Industry 4.0 as a Part of Smart Cities. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(February), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCSP.2016.7501015spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez Ávila, M., & Fierro Moreno, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: un enfoque técnico práctico / Application of the PLS-SEM technique in Knowledge Management: a practical technical approach. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo (Vol. 8). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336spa
dc.relation.referencesMay, G., & Stahl, B. (2017). The significance of organizational change management for sustainable competitiveness in manufacturing: exploring the firm archetypes. International Journal of Production Research,.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big Data. The management revolution. Harvard Buiness Review, 90(10), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0249-5spa
dc.relation.referencesMerendino, A., Dibb, S., Meadows, M., Quinn, L., Wilson, D., Simkin, L., & Canhoto, A. (2018). Big data, big decisions: The impact of big data on board level decision-making. Journal of Business Research, 93, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.029spa
dc.relation.referencesMihardjo, L. W. W., Sasmoko, Alamsyah, F., & Elidjen. (2019). The influence of digital leadership on innovation management based on dynamic capability: Market orientation as a moderator. Management Science Letters, 9(7), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.3.018spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de minas y Energía, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Unidad de Planeación Minero-Energética, & Iniciativa Colombia Inteligente. (2016). 07 Parte II Mapa de Ruta: Construcción y Resultados (COMPONENTE I). Smart Grids Colombia Visión 2030, 2(Componente I), 175.spa
dc.relation.referencesMishra, D., Luo, Z., Hazen, B., Hassini, E., & Foropon, C. (2018, September 12). Organizational capabilities that enable big data and predictive analytics diffusion and organizational performance: A resource-based perspective. Management Decision, pp. 1734–1755. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2018-0324spa
dc.relation.referencesMohanty, S. P., Choppali, U., & Kougianos, E. (2016). The Internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(3), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2556879spa
dc.relation.referencesMontúfar, R. G. (2013). Desarrollo organizacional: principios y aplicaciones. (2013 McGraw Hill/Interamericana de México, Ed.). McGraw Hill/Interamericana de México. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=E3BqngEACAAJspa
dc.relation.referencesÕrjan, L. (1998). Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness as a basis for TPM activities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(5), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579810206334spa
dc.relation.referencesPatgiri, R., & Ahmed, A. (2016). Big Data : The V ’ s of the Game Changer Paradigm, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC-SmartCity-DSS.2016.8spa
dc.relation.referencesPenley, L. E., & Gould, S. (1988). Etzioni ’ s Model of Organizational Involvement : A Perspective for Understanding Commitment to Organizations Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488139 Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : Etzioni ’ s model of organizational. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(March 1987), 43–59.spa
dc.relation.referencesPereira, C. S., Durão, N., Fonseca, D., Ferreira, M. J., & Moreira, F. (2020). An Educational Approach for Present and Future of Digital Transformation in Portuguese Organizations. Applied Sciences, 10(3), 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030757spa
dc.relation.referencesPeteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1126spa
dc.relation.referencesPisano, G., Teece, D. J., Shuen, A., & Teece Gary Shuen, Amy, D. J. P. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(07), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/CJAS.117spa
dc.relation.referencesPopper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. Essays and Lectures.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrice, A. D. F., & Chahal, K. (2006). A strategic framework for change management. Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500227011spa
dc.relation.referencesReis, J., Amorim, M., Melao, N., & Matos, P. (2018). Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research. In Á. R. et al. (Eds.) (Ed.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (WorldCIST’, pp. 411–421). Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41spa
dc.relation.referencesRialti, R., Marzi, G., Ciappei, C., & Busso, D. (2019). Big data and dynamic capabilities: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Management Decision, MD-07-2018-0821. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0821spa
dc.relation.referencesRialti, R., Marzi, G., Silic, M., & Ciappei, C. (2018). Ambidextrous organization and agility in big data era: The role of business process management systems. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1091–1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2017-0210spa
dc.relation.referencesRichard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560spa
dc.relation.referencesRollins, M., Bellenger, D. N., & Johnston, W. J. (2012). Customer information utilization in business-to-business markets: Muddling through process? Journal of Business Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero, J., Matamoros, S., & Campo, C. A. (2013). On organizational change. A Literature Review. Innovar, 23(50), 35–52. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84888105093&partnerID=40&md5=6a4b9bc90277ad4b433f1a4d312ececespa
dc.relation.referencesSambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., Grover, V., Bennett, J., Perrewé, P. L., Kane, G. C., … Performance, W. (2003). Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530spa
dc.relation.referencesSandoval Duque, J. L. (2014). Los procesos de cambio organizacional y la generación de valor. Organizational Change Processes and Value Creation.spa
dc.relation.referencesSantoro, G., Fiano, F., Bertoldi, B., & Ciampi, F. (2018, September 12). Big data for business management in the retail industry. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0829spa
dc.relation.referencesSantoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2018). The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.034spa
dc.relation.referencesSCE-Cisco-IBM Sgra Team_2011. (2011). Smart Grid Reference Architecture. International Business, 1, 1–118.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchallmo, D., Williams, C. A., & Boardman, L. (2017). Digital Transformation of Business Models — Best Practice, Enablers, and Roadmap. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(08), 1740014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961740014Xspa
dc.relation.referencesSklyar, A., Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B., & Sörhammar, D. (2019). Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.012spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640spa
dc.relation.referencesValentin, B. A. (2017). Methods of Assessment and Training of a Company Towards the Enterprise 4.0. Proceedings of the 28th DAAAM International Symposium, 28, 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.148spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2013). {VOSviewer} manual. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden, (September). Retrieved from http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003spa
dc.relation.referencesWade, & Hulland. (2004). Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148626spa
dc.relation.referencesWarner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitten, G. D., Kenneth, W. G., & Zelbst, P. J. (2012). Triple-A supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195727spa
dc.relation.referencesZollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science.spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.spaAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc330 - Economía, 620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines, 658 - Administración general,spa
dc.subject.proposaldecision makingeng
dc.subject.proposaltransformación digitalspa
dc.subject.proposaltransformación organizacionalspa
dc.subject.proposalorganizational transformationeng
dc.subject.proposalcapacidades dinámicasspa
dc.titleTransformación digital y desempeño organizacional en empresas del sector de energía eléctricaspa
dc.title.alternativeDigital transformation and organizational performance in electrical power companiesspa
dc.typeDocumento de trabajospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WPspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis MSc_Transformación Digital_JARG_Rev_I.pdf
Tamaño:
3.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.9 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: