Taxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptions

dc.contributor.advisorRueda Ramirez, Diana Marcela
dc.contributor.advisorGaigl, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Montaña, Luis Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T22:01:44Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T22:01:44Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-04
dc.descriptionilustraciones, fotografías, graficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractLepidocyrtus with almost 265 species described, is the largest genus of Entomobryidae, defined by 8+8 eyes, rounded scales, and bidentate mucro. The genus is taxonomically problematic because of the lack of taxonomic characters to discriminate species, or available to subgenus level. This obeys to incomplete morphological descriptions, and taxonomy based mainly on European or Asian species, which difficult, in this case, the taxonomic study of the Neotropical species. Morphological descriptions are not free of problems, related mainly to the lack of standardized anatomical terminology, required in the formalization and standardization of morphological descriptions. Due to the above, this study addresses two main objectives: 1) to review the taxonomy of the Neotropical species of the genus Lepidocyrtus, which includes the extension of previous descriptions, and description of new species. As well as the definition of groups of species and taxonomic location within subgenera; 2) to incorporate semantic methods for morphological descriptions, which includes the presentation of an anatomical ontology for Collembola (Collembola Anatomy Ontology, CLAO) and the evaluation of semantic methods based on RDF (Resource Description Framework).The examined species come from biological collections or field work, whose morphological descriptions expressed in natural language and RDF triples. In total, 52 species were examined with definition of 17 species groups based chaetotaxy, vestiture, dental tubercle, and apical bulb., As a result of the review, nineteen new species are also. Likewise, the examined species were located within the subgenera Lanocyrtus, Fractocyrtus, Ascocyrtus, Lepidocyrtus s.str., and Acrocyrtus. An Collembola Anatomy Ontology (CLAO) was developed together with the implementation of semantic methods for the morphological description of the Neotropical species of Lepidocyrtus. The morphology of Lepidocyrtus shows little variation; however, the chaetotaxy is still the main source of taxonomic characters. The proposal of groups of species contributes to the organization of the genus, but at the subgenus level a phylogenetic exploration can contribute to the delimitation of these. The anatomical ontology is a promising tool in morphological data management, which needs development in the future.eng
dc.description.abstractLepidocyrtus con cerca de 265 especies descritas es el género más grande de Entomobryidae, el cual es definido por el número de ocelos 8+8, escamas redondeadas, y mucrón bidentado. El género es taxonómicamente problemático debido a la carencia de caracteres taxonómicos para la delimitación de especies, o en la designación dentro de subgéneros. Lo anterior obedece a descripciones morfológicas incompletas, y taxonomía basada únicamente en especies europeas o asiáticas, lo cual dificulta, en este caso, el estudio taxonómico de las especies Neotropicales. Las descripciones morfológicas tampoco son libres de problemas, los cuales están relacionados a la falta de una terminología anatómica estandarizada requerida en la formalización y estandarización de descripciones morfológicas. Debido a lo anterior, este estudio aborda dos objetivos principales: 1) Revisar la taxonomía de las especies Neotropicales del género Lepidocyrtus, lo cual incluye la extensión de descripciones previas, y descripción de nuevas especies. Así como la definición de grupos de especies y ubicación taxonómica dentro de subgéneros; 2) Incorporar métodos semánticos para descripciones morfológicas, lo cual incluye la presentación de una ontología anatómica para Collembola (Collembola Anatomy Ontology, CLAO) y la evaluación de métodos semánticos basados sobre RDF (Resource Description Framework). Las especies examinadas proviene de colecciones biológicas o trabajo de campo, cuyas descripciones morfológicas fueron expresadas en lenguaje natural y tripletes RDF. En total, 52 especies fueron revisadas con la definición de 17 grupos de especies basados sobre la quetotaxia, vestidura, tubérculo dental, y bulbo apical. Como resultado de la revisión se proponen también 19 nuevas especies. Así mismo, las especies examinadas fueron ubicadas en los subgéneros Lanocyrtus, Fractocyrtus, Ascocyrtus, Lepidocyrtus s.str., y Acrocyrtus. Una ontología anatómica para Collembola (CLAO) fue desarrollada junto a la implementación de métodos semánticos para la descripción morfológica de las especies neotropicales de Lepidocyrtus. La morfología de Lepidocyrtus muestra poca variación; sin embargo, la quetotaxia sigue siendo la principal fuente de caracteres taxonómicos. La propuesta de grupos de especies contribuye a la organización del género, pero a nivel de subgénero una exploración filogenética puede contribuir a la delimitación de estos. Las ontologías anatómicas son una herramienta prometedora en la gestión de datos morfológicos, lo cual necesita mayor desarrollo hacia el futuro. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.description.researchareaEntomologíaspa
dc.description.sponsorshipMinciencias, Doctorados Nacionales 727spa
dc.format.extent401 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.otherhttps://github.com/luis-gonzalez-m
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81441
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentEscuela de posgradosspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Agrarias - Doctorado en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.relation.referencesBardgett, R. D. 2002. Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil. Zoology, 105(4), 367-375.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaquero, E., Mandal, G. & Jordana, R. 2014. Singular fauna of Entomobryidae (Collembola) from" Land of Passes" in the Himalayas, India. Florida Entomologist, 1554-1587.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaquero, E., Mandal, G. & Jordana, R. 2015. Entomobryoidea (Collembola) from Himachal Pradesh (India) in the Himalayas. Zootaxa, 4027(1), 1-41.spa
dc.relation.referencesBellinger, P.F., Christiansen, K.A. & Janssens, F. 2021 Checklist of the Collembola of the World. 1996– 2021. Available online at http://www.collembola.org. (accessed 10 June 2021).spa
dc.relation.referencesBellini, B. C., Cipola, N. G., & Godeiro, N. N. 2015. New species of Lepidocyrtus Bourlet and Entomobrya Rondani (Collembola: Entomobryoidea: Entomobryidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 4027(2), 227-242.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeruete, E., Baquero, E. & Jordana, R. 2002. New species of Pseudosinella (Collembola: Entomobryidae) from karst caves of the Basque bio-speleologic district., Ann. Soc. entomol. Fr. (n.s.), 2002, 38 (4), p.385-398.spa
dc.relation.referencesBörner, C. 1913. Die Familien der Collembolen. Zool. Anz. 41: 315-322.spa
dc.relation.referencesBourlet, C. 1839. Mémoire sur les Podures., Mémoires de la Société Royale des Sciences, de l'Agriculture et des Arts, de Lille, Année 1839, p.377-418.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrennan, A., Fortune, T., and Bolger, T. 2006. Collembola abundances and assemblage structures in conventionally tilled and conservation tillage arable systems. Pedobiologia, 50(2): 135-145.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarapelli, A., Frati, F., Fanciulli, P. & Dallai, R. 2001. Taxonomic revision of 14 south-western European species of Isotomurus (Collembola, Isotomidae), with description of four new species and the designation of the neotype for I. palustris. Zoologica Scripta, 30, 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2001.00055.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarpenter, G. 1916. Iles Seychelles. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 28-58.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristiansen K. 1954. Ratios as a means of specific differentiation in Collembola. Entomological News 65: 177–178.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristiansen, K. 1958. The Entomobryiforrn Male Genital Plate. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 65, 1:474-476.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristiansen, K. & Bellinger, P. 1991. Phylogeny of the Hawaiian species of the genus Lepidocyrtus (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Revue d'Écologie et de Biologie du Sol, 28 (2), 207–215.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristiansen, K. & Bellinger, P. 1998. The Collembola of North America North of the Rio Grande, A taxonomic analysis., Grinnell College, Iowa, p.1-1520.spa
dc.relation.referencesCipola, N. G., Morais, J. W. & Bellini, B. C. 2017. The discovery of Lepidocyrtoides Schött, 1917 (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Entomobryinae) from the New World, including three new species from Brazil and one from Australia. Zootaxa, 4324(2), 201-248.spa
dc.relation.referencesCipola, N. G., de Morais, J. W., & Bellini, B. C. 2019. New subgenus and four species of Lepidocyrtus Bourlet (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Lepidocyrtinae) from Amazon. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 50(2), 189-234.spa
dc.relation.referencesCipola, N., Oliveira, J., Bellini, B., Ferreira, A., Lima, E., Brito, R. & Stievano, L. 2020. Review of eyeless Pseudosinella Schäffer (Collembola, Entomobryidae, and Lepidocyrtinae) from Brazilian caves. Insects, 11-194. doi:10.3390/insects11030194.spa
dc.relation.referencesCucini, C., Fanciulli, P. P., Frati, F., Convey, P., Nardi, F., & Carapelli, A. 2021. Re-evaluating the internal phylogenetic relationships of Collembola by means of mitogenome data. Genes, 12(1), 44.spa
dc.relation.referencesCulik, M., de Souza, J., & Ventura, J. 2002. Biodiversity of Collembola in tropical agricultural environments of Espı́ritu Santo, Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology, 21(1): 49-58.spa
dc.relation.referencesDaston, L., 1992. Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Soc. Stud. Sci. 22, 597–618.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeharveng, L. 2004. Recent advances in Collembola systematics. Pedobiologia, 48(5-6), 415-433.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Freitas, T. 2016. Novas espécies de Entomobryoidea, Womersley, 1934 (Collembola, Hexapoda) em duas áreas de caatinga do Rio Grande do Norte. Universidade Fedeal do Rio Grande do Norte, Centro de Biociências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em ciencias biológicas, Natal. 85p. (unpublished thesis).spa
dc.relation.referencesde Izarra, D. C. 1972. Fauna colembologica de isla Victoria (provincia de Neuquen, Argentina). III. Familias Isotomidae y Entomobryidae. Physis.spa
dc.relation.referencesDenis, J. R. 1924. Sur la faune français des Aptérygotes (V) (Note préliminaire) [Collembola included]., Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, Séance du 26 novembre 1924, p.197-199.spa
dc.relation.referencesDenis, J.R. 1931. Collemboles de Costa Rica avec une contribution au species de l'orde., Contribution alla conoscenza del "MICROGENTON" di Costa Rica, II., Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, 25, p.69,111-120 of 69-170.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, W.N. 1967. Studies on neotropical Collembola, I. Some Collembola from Guatemala., Beaufortia, Volume 14, No. 171, August 15, 1967, p.93-107.spa
dc.relation.referencesFitzhugh, K. 2006. The philosophical basis of character coding for the inference of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zoologica scripta, 35(3), 261-286.spa
dc.relation.referencesFjellberg, A. 1999. The labial palp in Collembola. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 237, 309–330.spa
dc.relation.referencesFolsom, J. W. 1933. The economic importance of Collembola. Journal of Economic Entomology, 26(5): 934-939.spa
dc.relation.referencesFolsom, J.W. 1927. Insects of the subclass Apterygota from Central America and the West Indies. No. 2702. - From the Proceedings of the United States National Museum, Vol.72, Washington, p.1-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesGange, A. 2000. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Collembola and plant growth. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(9), 369-372.spa
dc.relation.referencesGisin, H. 1964. Collemboles d’Europe VII. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 71(4), 649–678.spa
dc.relation.referencesGisin, H. 1967. Espèces nouvelles et lignées évolutives de Pseudosinella endogés (Collembola). Memórias e Estudos do Museu Zoológico da. Universidade de Coimbra, 301, 6–25.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Montaña, L. A. 2021. Collembola Anatomy Ontology. GitHub repository, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4660386.spa
dc.relation.referencesGruia, M. 1983. Collemboles arthropléones de Cuba récoltés par les expéditions cubano-roumaines en 1969-1973. II. Résultats des expéditions biospéologiques cubano-roumaines à Cuba, 4, p.191-205.spa
dc.relation.referencesGruia, M. 1984. Collemboles Arthropléones de Cuba récoltés par les expéditions cubano-roumaines en 1969-1973. III., Trav. Inst. Spéol. Emile Racovitza, t.XXIII, 1984, p.19-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesHandschin, E. 1927. Collembolen aus Costa Rica. Colémbolos de Costa Rica. Entomologische Mitteilungen, 16(2), 110-118.spa
dc.relation.referencesHüther, W. 1971. Collembolen von einem Hamburger Müllplatz (Vorläufige Mitteilung)., Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg, 4. Band, Nr.72, 15. April 1971, p.157-165.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacquemart, S. 1976. Collemboles nouveau des Iles Galápagos. Mission zoologique belge aux Iles Galápagos et en Ecuador (N. et J. Leleup, 1964-1965) Volume III, 1976. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. Brussel. p.137-157.spa
dc.relation.referencesKatz, A. D., Giordano, R. & Soto-Adames, F.N. 2015. Operational criteria for cryptic species delimitation when evidence is limited, as exemplified by North American Entomobrya (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, p.1-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesKatz, A., Giordano, R. & Soto-Adames, F. 2015. Taxonomic review and phylogenetic analysis of fifteen North American Entomobrya (Collembola, Entomobryidae), including four new species. ZooKeys, 525, 1.spa
dc.relation.referencesKraepelin, K. 1901. Uber die durch den Schiffsverkehr in Hamburg eingeschleppten Tiere. Mitteilungen aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum in Hamburg, 18, 183–209.spa
dc.relation.referencesMari Mutt, J. 1979. On the Taxonomic Status of Strongylonotus MacGillivray and Heteromuricus Imms (Collembola Entomobryidae)., Rev. Écol. Biol. Sol, 1979, 16 (4), p.541-546.spa
dc.relation.referencesMari Mutt, J. A. 1983. Two new species of Lepidocyrtus from Paramo de Mucubaji Merida, Venezuela (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, 1983, p.53-59.spa
dc.relation.referencesMari Mutt, J. A. 1986. Puerto Rican species of Lepidocyrtus and Pseudosinella (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 22, No. 1-2, 1986, p.1-48.spa
dc.relation.referencesMari Mutt, J. A. 1986. Research Note. Comments on the Taxonomic Status of Strongylonotus MacGillivray (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Carribean Journal of Science, Vol. 22, No 3-4, 1986, p.215-217.spa
dc.relation.referencesMari Mutt, J. A. 1987. Collembola from Two Localities Near Buenaventura, Colombia., Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 60 (3), 1987, p.364-379.spa
dc.relation.referencesMari Mutt, J. A. 1988. Two New Species of Lepidocyrtus from Puerto Rico and descriptive Notes for L. ramosi Mari Mutt (Collembola: Entomobryidae)., Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 24, No. 3-4,197-200.spa
dc.relation.referencesMari Mutt, J. & Bellinger, P. 1990. A Catalog of the Neotropical Collembola, Including Nearctic Areas of Mexico., Florida. 1-237p.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarlier, G. 1945. Collemboles du Congo Belge. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 38: 3-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E. 2008. The European Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 1769(1), 35-59.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E. 2012. The European Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus group (Collembola: Entomobryidae), definition and description of a new species from Spain. Zootaxa, 3570(1), 69-81.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E., & Petersen, H. 2012. Definition of the European Lepidocyrtus curvicollis group (Collembola: Entomobryidae) with description of a new species from Sardinia (Italy). Zootaxa, 3273(1), 51-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E., & Greenslade, P. 2015. Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) I: diagnosis of the subgenus Setogaster, new records and redescriptions of species. Zootaxa, 4044(1), 105-129.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E., & Greenslade, P. 2021. Towards understanding Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) II: new Australian species. Zootaxa, 4981(2), 365-387.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E. & Winkler, D. 2018. New data clarifying the taxonomy of European members of the Lepidocyrtus pallidus–serbicus group (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4429(3), 548-568.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E., Escuer, P., Buşmachiu, G., Riutort, M. & Álvarez-Presas, M. 2018. Untangling Lepidocyrtus (Collembola, Entomobryidae): new molecular data shed light on the relationships of the European groups. Invertebrate Systematics, 32(3), 639-651.spa
dc.relation.referencesMateos, E. 2020. European Lepidocyrtus lignorum-group, new findings and redescritpion of Lepidocyrtus pulchellus Denis, 1926 (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4790(3):564-576.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeyer-Wolfarth, F., Schrader, S., Oldenburg, E., Weinert, J., & Brunotte, J. 2017. Collembolans and soil nematodes as biological regulators of the plant pathogen Fusarium culmorum. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 124(5): 493-498.spa
dc.relation.referencesMills, H. B. 1938. Collembola from Yucatan caves. Carnegie Institution of Washington. 183-196 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesPan, Z. X., Chatterjee, T., & Zhang, F. 2011. a new species of the genus Acrocyrtus Yosii, 1959. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 36(2), 231-236.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, H. 2002. General aspects of collembolan ecology at the turn of the millennium. Pedobiologia, 46: 246–260.spa
dc.relation.referencesPotapov, M., Porco, D. & Deharveng, L. 2018. A new member of the genus Isotomurus from the Kuril Islands (Collembola: Isotomidae): returning to the problem of “colour pattern species”. 2018. Zootaxa, Magnolia Press, 4394 (3): 383-394. http://10.11646/zootaxa.4394.3.4.spa
dc.relation.referencesPotapov, A., Bellini, B., Chown, S., Deharveng, L., Janssens, F., Kováč, Ľ., Ponge, J., Potapov, M., Querner, P., Russel, D., Sun, X., Zhang, F. & Berg, M. 2020. Towards a global synthesis of Collembola knowledge: challenges and potential solutions. Soil Organisms, 92(3), 161-188.spa
dc.relation.referencesReibe, K., Götz, K. P., Roß, C. L., Döring, T. F., Ellmer, F. & Ruess, L. 2015. Impact of quality and quantity of biochar and hydrochar on soil Collembola and growth of spring wheat. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 83: 84-87.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoatta, J., Acosta, D. L. & Acosta, A. 1989. Muestreo poblacional de Onychiurus armatus Tullberg (Collembola: Onychiuridae) en cultivos de clavel y crisantemo bajo invernadero. Agronomía Colombiana, 6(1-2): 64-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesSabatini, M., & Innocenti, G. 2000. Functional relationships between Collembola and plant pathogenic fungi of agricultural soils. Pedobiologia, 44(3-4): 467-475.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchäffer, C. 1897. Apterygoten. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise Apterygoten 8: 1–48.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods, 9(7): 671-675, PMID 22930834.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeastedt, T. R. 1984. The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annual review of entomology, 29(1): 25-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesSechi, V., D'Annibale, A., Ambus, P., Sárossy, Z., Krogh, P. H., Eriksen, J., and Holmstrup, M. 2014. Collembola feeding habits and niche specialization in agricultural grasslands of different composition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 74: 31-38.spa
dc.relation.referencesSereno, P. C. 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics, 23(6), 565-587.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto‐Adames, F. N. 2000. Phylogeny of Neotropical Lepidocyrtus (Collembola: Entomobryidae): first assessment of patterns of speciation in Puerto Rico and phylogenetic relevance of some subgeneric diagnostic characters. Systematic Entomology, 25(4), 485-502.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto-Adames, F. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of the Puerto Rican Lepidocyrtus and Pseudosinella (Hexapoda: Collembola), a validation of Yoshii’s “color pattern species”. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 25(1): 27-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto-Adames, F., Barra, J., Christiansen, K., & Jordana, R. 2008. Suprageneric classification of collembola Entomobryomorpha. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101(3), 501-513.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto-Adames, F. N. 2010. Two new species and descriptive notes for five Pseudosinella species (Hexapoda: Collembola: Entomobryidae) from West Virginian (USA) caves. Zootaxa, 2331(1), 1-34.spa
dc.relation.referencesSousa, J., Bolger, T, da Gama, M., Lukkari, T., Ponge, J., Simön, C., Traser, G., Vanbergen, A., Brennan, A., Dubs, F., Ivitis, E., Keating, A., Stofer, S. & Watt, A. 2006. Changes in Collembola richness and diversity along a gradient of land-use intensity: a pan European study. Pedobiologia, 50: 147-156.spa
dc.relation.referencesSouth, A. 1961. The taxonomy of the British species of Entomobrya (Collembola). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 113: 387–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1961.tb00798.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesSzeptycki, A. 1972. Morpho-systematic studies on Collembola, III. Body chaetotaxy in the first instars of several genera of the Entomobryomorpha., Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, Tom XVII, Nr 15, Kraków, 30 XI 1972, p.341-372.spa
dc.relation.referencesSzeptycki, A. 1979. Chaetotaxy of the Entomobryidae and its phylogenetical significance, Morpho-systematic studies on Collembola IV, Kraków, p.1-218.spa
dc.relation.referencesThibaud, J.M. & Najt, J. 1987. Collemboles (Insecta) de l'Equateur, II. Entomobryidae p.p., Cyphoderidae et Oncopoduridae, Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat, Paris, 4e série, 9, section A, no 4, 1987, p.933-946.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt, L., Bartolomaeus, T., & Giribet, G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics, 26(3): 301-325.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, F., Chen, J.-X. & Christiansen, K. 2003. Taxonomy of the genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. (Collembola: Entomobryidae) in East and Southeast Asia and Malaysia, with description of a new species from the People's Republic of China. The Canadian Entomologist 135: 823–837.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillmann, R. 2016. The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations. The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig, 86, 128.spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkler, D. 2017. New Lepidocyrtus Bourlet, 1839 from riverine woodland in Hungary (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zootaxa, 4250(6), 529-540.spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkler, D. & Traser, G. 2012. Explanation of the European Lepidocyrtus pallidus–serbicus group (Collembola, Entomobryidae), with description of new species from Hungary. Zootaxa, 3394(1), 35-47.spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkler, D., Mateos, E., Traser, G., Lakatos, F., & Tóth, V. 2020. New Insight into the Systematics of European Lepidocyrtus (Collembola: Entomobryidae) Using Molecular and Morphological Data. Insects, 11(5), 302.spa
dc.relation.referencesXu, G. L., Pan, Z. X., & Zhang, F. 2013. First record of Acrocyrtus Yosii, 1959 (Collemobla, Entomobryidae) from Chinese mainland. ZooKeys, (260), 1.spa
dc.relation.referencesYosii, R. 1959. Studies on the Collembolan Fauna of Malay and Singapore with special reference to the genera: Lobella, Lepidocyrtus and Callyntrura. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory Kyoto University, No.10, p.1-65.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoshii, R. 1982. Lepidocyrtid Collembola of Sabah., Entomological Report from the Sabah Forest Research Centre No. 5, March 1982, p.1-47.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoshii, R., 1989. On some Collembola of New Caledonia, with notes on the ‘‘colour pattern species’’. Contr. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ. 27, 233–259.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoshii, R. & Suhardjono, Y.R. 1989. Notes on the Collembolan Fauna of Indonesia and its vicinities. I. Miscellaneous Notes, with special references to Seirini and Lepidocyrtini., Acta Zoologica Asiae Orientalis, Vol.1, p.23-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoshii, R. & Suhardjno, Y.R. 1992. Notes on the Collembolan Fauna of Indonesia and its Vicinities. II. Collembola of Irian Jaya and Maluku Islands, Acta Zoologica Asiae Orientalis, Vol.2, 1992, August, p.1-52.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, F., Chen, Z., Dong, R. R., Deharveng, L., Stevens, M. I., Huang, Y. H., & Zhu, C. D. 2014. Molecular phylogeny reveals independent origins of body scales in Entomobryidae (Hexapoda: Collembola). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 70, 231-239.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, F. and Deharveng, L. 2015. Systematic revision of Entomobryidae (Collembola) by integrating molecular and new morphological evidence. Zoologica Scripta, 44(3): 298-311.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, F., Yu, D., Stevens, M. I. & Ding, Y. 2019. Colouration, chaetotaxy and molecular data provide species-level resolution in a species complex of Dicranocentrus (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Invertebrate Systematics, 32(6), 1298-1315.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmith, M., He, Z., Bian, J., Lossio-Ventura, J. A., & Tao, C. (2018). Assessing the practice of biomedical ontology evaluation: Gaps and opportunities. Journal of biomedical informatics, 80, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.010.spa
dc.relation.referencesCabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods, and applications (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.7202/004006ar.spa
dc.relation.referencesBalhoff, J., Mikó, I., Yoder, M., Mullins, P. & Deans, A. 2013. A semantic model for species description applied to the ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia.Systematic Biology, 62(5), 639-659. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt028.spa
dc.relation.referencesBouzidi, R., De Nicola, A., Nader, F., & Chalal, R. 2019. OntoGamif: A modular ontology for integrated gamification. Applied Ontology, 14(3), 215-249.spa
dc.relation.referencesCui, H., Xu, D., Chong, S., Ramirez, M., Rodenhausen, T., Macklin, J., Ludäscher, B., Morris, R., Soto, E. & Koch N. 2016. Introducing explorer of taxon concepts with a case study on spider measurement matrix building. BMC Bioinformatics, 17(1):471. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1352-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdgecombe, G. D. 2008. Anatomical nomenclature: homology, standardization and datasets. Zootaxa, 1950(1): 87-95. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1950.1.8.spa
dc.relation.referencesFaddeeva, A., Studer, R., Kraaijeveld, K., Sie, D., Ylstra, B., Mariën, J., op den Camp, H., Datema, E., den Dunnen, J., van Straalen, N. & Roelofs, D. 2015. Collembolan transcriptomes highlight molecular evolution of hexapods and provide clues on the adaptation to terrestrial life. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130600. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0130600.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlimm, B., Horrocks, I.,Motik, B. & Stoilos, G. 2010. Optimizing Ontology Classification. In: Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Yue Pan, Pascal Hitzler, Peter Mika, Lei Zhang, Jeff Z. Pan, Ian Horrocks, and Birte Glimm, editors, Proc. of the 9th Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC 2010), volume 6496 of LNCS, pp. 225—240.spa
dc.relation.referencesGöpel, T. & Wirkner, C. 2018. Morphological description, character conceptualization and the reconstruction of ancestral states exemplified by the evolution of arthropod hearts. PloS one, 13(9), e0201702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201702.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaendel, M. A., Balhoff, J. P., Bastian, F. B., Blackburn, D. C., Blake, J., Bradford, Y., Comte, A., Dahdul, W. M., Dececchi, T. A., Druzinsky, R. E., Hayamizu, T. F., Ibrahim, N., Lewis, S. E., Mabee, P. M., Niknejad, A., Robinson-Rechavi, M., Sereno, P. C. & Mungall C. J. 2014. Unification of multi-species vertebrate anatomy ontologies for comparative biology in Uberon. J. Biomed. Semant. 5:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesJackson, R., Balhoff, J., Douglass, E., Harris, N., Mungall, C. & Overton, J. 2019. ROBOT: A tool for automating ontology workflows. BMC bioinformatics, 20(1): 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3002-3.spa
dc.relation.referencesKalet, I. 2009. Modeling Biological Structure, pp. 303-323. In: Kalet, I. (Eds), Principles of Biomedical Informatics, Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-369438-6.00011-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeet, C. 2013. Granularity. In: Dubitzky W., Wolkenhauer O., Cho KH., Yokota H. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Systems Biology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_65.spa
dc.relation.referencesMabee, P. M., Ashburner, M., Cronk, Q., Gkoutos, G. V., Haendel, M., Segerdell, E., Mungall, C. & Westerfield, M. 2007. Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.013.spa
dc.relation.referencesMabee, P., Balhoff, J., Dahdul, W., Lapp, H., Mungall, C. & Vision, T. 2020. A logical model of homology for comparative biology. Systematic Biology, 69(2), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz067.spa
dc.relation.referencesMikó, I., Masner, L., Johannes, E., Yoder, M. & Deans, A. 2013. Male terminalia of Ceraphronoidea: morphological diversity in an otherwise monotonous taxon. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 44(3-4), 261-347. http://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-04402002.spa
dc.relation.referencesMullins, P., Kawada, R., Balhoff, J. & Deans, A. 2012. A revision of Evaniscus (Hymenoptera, Evaniidae) using ontology-based semantic phenotype annotation. ZooKeys, (223), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.223.3572.spa
dc.relation.referencesMungall, C., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G., Lewis, S. & Haendel, M. 2012. Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biology, 13(1), R5. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5.spa
dc.relation.referencesMusen, M. A. 2015. The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence, 1(4). http://doi.org/10.1145/2557001.25757003.spa
dc.relation.referencesNoy, N. & McGuinness, D. 2001. “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology,” Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Tech. Rep., http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ ontology development/ontology101.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Leary, M. & Kaufman, S. 2011. MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud”. Cladistics, 27(5):529-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00355.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesRichter, S. & Wirkner, C. 2014. A research program for Evolutionary Morphology. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 52(4), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12061.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, B. & Varzi, A. (2000). Bona Fide and Fiat Boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(2):401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2653492.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Kohler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A. & Rosse, C. 2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol. 6: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W. Goldberg, L., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C., The OBI Consortium, Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Rutterberg, A., Sansone, S., Scheuermann, R., Shah, N., Whetzel, P. & Lewis, S. 2007. The OBO Foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biol. 25:1251–1255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1346.spa
dc.relation.referencesTopalis, P., Tzavlaki, C., Vestaki, K., Dialynas, E., Sonenshine, D. E., Butler, R., Bruggner, R., Stinson, E., Collins, F. & Louis, C. 2008. Anatomical ontologies of mosquitoes and ticks, and their web browsers in VectorBase. Insect molecular biology, 17(1), 87-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00781.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesTravillian, R., Malone, J., Pang, C., Hancock, J., Holland, P. W. H., Schofield, P. & Parkinson H. (2011). The vertebrate bridging ontology (VBO). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (Bio-Ontologies 2011); 2011 July 26–30; Buffalo,NewYork. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org).spa
dc.relation.referencesTrietsch, C, Mikó, I, Notton, D. & Deans, A. 2018. Unique extrication structure in a new megaspilid, Dendrocerus scutellaris Trietsch & Mikó (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e22676. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e22676.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt, L. 2017. Assessing similarity: on homology, characters and the need for a semantic approach to non-evolutionary comparative homology. Cladistics, 33: 513-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12179.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt, L., Bartolomaeus, T. & Giribet, G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics,26(3), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00286.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt, L. 2019. Organizing phenotypic data—a semantic data model for anatomy. Journal of biomedical semantics, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-019-0204-6spa
dc.relation.referencesWirkner, C., Göpel, T., Runge, J., Keiler, J., Klussmann-Fricke, B., Huckstorf, K., Scholz, S., Mikó, I., Yoder, M. & Richter, S. 2016. The first organ-based ontology for arthropods (Ontology of Arthropod Circulatory Systems - OArCS) and its Integration into a novel formalization scheme for morphological descriptions. Systematic Biology, 66(5), 754-768. http://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw108.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoder, M. J., Mikó, I., Seltmann, K. C., Bertone, M. A. & Deans, A. R. 2010. A gross anatomy ontology for Hymenoptera. PloS one, 5(12), e15991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015991.spa
dc.relation.referencesYu, L. 2014. A developer’s guide to the semantic Web. Springer Science & Business Media. 829p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43796-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesAntoniou G, Van Harmelen F. A. 2004. semantic web primer. MIT press. 288p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBalhoff J, Dahdul W, Kothari C, Lapp H, Lundberg J, Mabee P, Midford P, Westerfield, M., Vision, T. 2021. Phenex: ontological annotation of phenotypic diversity. PLoS One, 5(5), e10500, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010500spa
dc.relation.referencesBalhoff J, Mikó I, Yoder M, Mullins P, Deans A. 2013. A semantic model for species description applied to the ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia. Systematic Biology, 62(5), 639-659, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt028spa
dc.relation.referencesBellinger PF, Christiansen KA, Janssens F. 1996– 2017. Checklist of the Collembola of the World. Available online at http://www.collembola.org. (Accessed 27 April 2021), 2021.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurks K, Miko I, Deans A. Dendrocerus mexicali (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea, Megaspilidae): Novel antennal morphology, first description of female, and expansion of known range into the US. ZooKeys, (569), 53, 2016. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.569.6629spa
dc.relation.referencesCui HO. 2008. Converting taxonomic descriptions to new digital formats. Biodiversity Informatics, 5(0). doi: 10.1.1.662.9637spa
dc.relation.referencesCui HO. 2012. CharaParser for fine‐grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4), 738-754, doi: 10.1002/asi.22618spa
dc.relation.referencesCui HO, Dahdul W, Dececchi A, Ibrahim N, Mabee P, Balhoff J, Gopalakrishnan H. 2015. CharaParser+ EQ: Performance evaluation without gold standard. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1):1-10, doi: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010020spa
dc.relation.referencesCui, HO, Zhang L, Ford B, Cheng HL, Macklin JA, Reznicek A, Starr J. 2021. Measurement Recorder: developing a useful tool for making species descriptions that produces computable phenotypes. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/baaa079spa
dc.relation.referencesDahdul W, Dececchi TA, Ibrahim N, Lapp H, Mabee P. 2015. Moving the mountain: analysis of the effort required to transform comparative anatomy into computable anatomy. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/bav040spa
dc.relation.referencesDallwitz M J. 1980. A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions. Taxon, 29(1), 41-46, doi: 10.2307/1219595spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Giacomo G, Lenzerini M. Tbox and Abox reasoning in expressive description logics. 1996. In: Proceedings of KR-96, pages 316–327. M. Kaufmann, Los Altos.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuCharme B. 2013. Learning SPARQL: querying and updating with SPARQL 1.1. O'Reilly Media, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesEliason C. M., Edwards S. V., Clarke J. A. 2019. Phenotools: An R package for visualizing and analysing phenomic datasets. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(9), 1393-1400, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13217.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrey J, Müller K, Hellmann S, Rahm E, & Vidal M. 2019. Evaluation of metadata representations in RDF stores. Semantic Web, 10(2), 205-229, doi: 10.3233/SW-180307.spa
dc.relation.referencesGirón, J. C., Mikó, I., Gonzalez-Montaña, L. A., Tarasov, S. & Matentzoglu, N. (2021, August 11). Ontology for the Anatomy of the Insect SkeletoMuscular system (AISM) v2021-08-11. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4660322spa
dc.relation.referencesGrumbling G, Strelets V. 2006. FlyBase: anatomical data, images, and queries. Nucleic Acids Research, 34(suppl. 1), D484-D488. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj068.spa
dc.relation.referencesHong C. 2012. CharaParser for fine-grained semantic annotation of organism morphological descriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(4):738-754, doi: 10.1002/asi.22618.spa
dc.relation.referencesMahner M. & Bunge M. 1997. Foundations of biophilosophy. Springer Science & Business Media. 445p.spa
dc.relation.referencesMikó I, Copeland R, Balhoff J, Yoder M, Deans A. 2014. Folding wings like a cockroach: a review of transverse wing folding ensign wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae: Afrevania and Trissevania). PLoS One, 9(5), e94056,. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094056.spa
dc.relation.referencesMikó I, Trietsch C, Sandall E, Yoder M, Hines H, Deans A. 2016. Malagasy Conostigmus (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea) and the secret of scutes. PeerJ, 4, e2682. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2682.spa
dc.relation.referencesMullins P, Kawada R, Balhoff J, Deans A. 2012. A revision of Evaniscus (Hymenoptera, Evaniidae) using ontology-based semantic phenotype annotation. ZooKeys, (223), 1, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.223.3572spa
dc.relation.referencesMungall C. 2007. Representing Phenotypes in OWL. Conference: Proceedings of the OWLED 2007 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, Innsbruck, Austria, June 6-7spa
dc.relation.referencesMusen M., A. 2015. The Protégé project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters. Association of Computing Machinery Specific Interest Group in Artificial Intelligence, 1(4), doi: 10.1145/2557001.25757003spa
dc.relation.referencesLeggio B, Laussu J, Carlier A, Godin C, Lemaire P, Faure E. 2019. MorphoNet: an interactive online morphological browser to explore complex multi-scale data. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-8, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10668-1spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Leary MA, Kaufman S. 2011. MorphoBank: phylophenomics in the “cloud”. Cladistics, 27(5), 529-537, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00355.xspa
dc.relation.referencesPaterson T, Kennedy JB, Pullan M, Cannon A, Armstrong K, Watson M, Raguenaud C, McDonald S, Russell G. 2004. A universal character model and ontology of defined terms for taxonomic description. In: International Workshop on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (pp. 63-78). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24745-6_5.spa
dc.relation.referencesSereno, P. C. 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics, 23(6), 565-587, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez M. J. & Michalik P. 2019. The spider anatomy ontology (SPD)—a versatile tool to link anatomy with cross-disciplinary data. Diversity, 11(10), 202, doi: 10.3390/d11100202.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva T. & Feitosa, R. 2019. Using controlled vocabularies in anatomical terminology: A case study with Strumigenys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Arthropod structure & development, 52, 100877, doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2019.100877.spa
dc.relation.referencesTarasov S. Integration of anatomy ontologies and evo-devo using structured Markov models suggests a new framework for modeling discrete phenotypic traits. Systematic Biology, 68(5), 698-716, 2020. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz005.spa
dc.relation.referencesThessen A, Cui, H. & Mozzherin D. 2012. Applications of natural language processing in biodiversity science. Advances in Bioinformatics, 391574, doi: 10.1155/2012/391574.spa
dc.relation.referencesTopalis P, Tzavlaki C, Vestaki K, Dialynas E, Sonenshine D, Butler R, Bruggner R, Stinson E, Collins F, Louis C. 2008. Anatomical ontologies of mosquitoes and ticks, and their web browsers in VectorBase. Insect Molecular Biology, 17(1), 87-89, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00781.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrietsch C, Mikó I, Notton D. G. & Deans A. R. 2018. Unique extrication structure in a new megaspilid, Dendrocerus scutellaris Trietsch & Mikó (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal, (6), doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e22676.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt L. 2019b. Morphological descriptions in times of eScience: instance-based versus class-based semantic representations of anatomy, 2019a. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28314.29124.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt L. Organizing phenotypic data—a semantic data model for anatomy. Journal of biomedical semantics, 10(1), 1-14, doi: 10.1186/s13326-019-0204-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt L, Baum R, Bhatty P, Köhler C, Meid, Quast B, Grobe P. 2019. SOCCOMAS: a FAIR web content management system that uses knowledge graphs and that is based on semantic programming. Database, doi: 10.1093/database/baz067.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt L, Baum R, Bhatty P, Grobe P, Köhler C, Meid S. Semantic Morph D Base (Prototype). n.d.. Available: https://proto.morphdbase.de/.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt L, Bartolomaeus T. & Giribe G. 2010. The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data. Cladistics, 26(3), 301-325, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00286.x.spa
dc.relation.referencesVogt L. 2017. Assessing similarity: on homology, characters, and the need for a semantic approach to non-evolutionary comparative homology. Cladistics, 33: 513-539, doi: 10.1111/cla.12179spa
dc.relation.referencesWilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten J, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes A, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo C, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJ, Growth P, Goble C, Grethe J, Heringa J, Hoen P, Hooft R, Kuhn T. Kok R, Kok J, Lusher S, Martone M, Mons A, Packer A, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, Schaik R, Sansone S, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz M, Thompson M, van der Lei J, Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg A, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Mons B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3(1), 1-9, doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18spa
dc.relation.referencesWillmann R. 2016. The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations. In: The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig, Eds. D. Williams, M. Schmitt, and Q. Wheeler. Published by Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWirkner C, Göpel T, Runge J, Keiler J, Klussmann-Fricke B, Huckstorf K, Scholz S, Mikó S, Yoder M. Richter S. 2016. The first organ-based ontology for arthropods (Ontology of Arthropod Circulatory Systems - OArCS) and its Integration into a novel formalization scheme for morphological descriptions. Systematic Biology, 66(5), 754-768, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw108spa
dc.relation.referencesWood M, Lydon S, Tablan V. Maynard D, & Cunningham H. 2003. Using parallel texts to improve recall in IE. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP ’03), pp. 505–512, Borovetz, Bulgaria.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoder M.J., Mikó I, Seltmann K.C., Bertone M. A. & Deans A. R. 2010. A gross anatomy ontology for Hymenoptera. PloS one, 5(12), e15991, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015991.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoder M, Twidale M, Thomer A, Vogt L, Franz N, Guo J, Deans A. & Balhoff J. 2018. Taxonomy, and the production of semantic phenotypes. In: Application of Semantic Technology in Biodiversity Science Anne E. Thessen (Ed.). IOS Press /AKA Verlag, pp. 53–77.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.agrovocuriCollembola
dc.subject.agrovocuriRegión neotropicalspa
dc.subject.ddc590 - Animales::592 - Invertebradosspa
dc.subject.proposalontología anatómicaspa
dc.subject.proposaltripletes RDFspa
dc.subject.proposalmétodos semánticosspa
dc.subject.proposalHexapodaspa
dc.subject.proposalAnatomy ontologyeng
dc.subject.proposalRDF tripleteng
dc.subject.proposalSemantic-based methodseng
dc.titleTaxonomic review of genus Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) for the Neotropical Region and inclusion of ontologies in morphological descriptionseng
dc.title.translatedRevisión taxonómica del género Lepidocyrtus s.l. Bourlet, 1839 (Collembola: Entomobryomorpha: Entomobryidae) para la región neotropical e inclusión de ontologías en descripciones morfológicasspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.fundernameMincienciasspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
7172108.2022.pdf
Tamaño:
8.2 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: