Diagnóstico tecnológico como herramienta de planeación estratégica. Caso de estudio: empresa de base tecnológica

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorRuiz Castañeda, Walter Lugo
dc.contributor.authorEscobar Ruiz, Felipe
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T18:56:43Z
dc.date.available2022-06-13T18:56:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-22
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este estudio es realizar un diagnóstico y evaluación de las capacidades tecnológicas de una empresa de base tecnológica, identificando así sus fortalezas y debilidades, con el fin de contribuir a la formulación de planes estratégicos que le permitan alcanzar y mantener una ventaja competitiva. Con este fin, se utiliza el proceso de análisis jerárquico para evaluar las capacidades tecnológicas, así como cada uno de sus indicadores clave de forma individual. Posteriormente, a través de entrevistas estructuradas, se revisa el desempeño de la organización en los elementos destacados, lo que les permite ponderarlos de acuerdo con los pesos relativos descubiertos a través del análisis jerárquico, determinando de esta manera el nivel de las capacidades tecnológicas de la empresa (texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research is to diagnose and evaluate a technology-based company's technological capabilities, therefore identifying its strengths and weaknesses, in order to assist in the formation of strategic plans that will enable it to achieve and sustain a competitive advantage. In order to do so, analytic hierarchy process is implemented to assess technological capabilities as well as each of their key indicators separately. Subsequently, the organization's performance in each specific area is evaluated via structured interviews, allowing them to be rated according to the relative weights identified through the hierarchical analysis, therefore defining the organization's technological capabilities. businesseng
dc.description.curricularareaÁrea Curricular de Ingeniería Administrativa e Ingeniería Industrialspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Ingeniería Administrativaspa
dc.format.extentx, 79 paginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81570
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellínspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería de la Organizaciónspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Minasspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.publisher.programMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Ingeniería Administrativaspa
dc.relation.referencesAfuah, A. (2002). Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: the case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 171– 179. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.221spa
dc.relation.referencesAguirre R., J. (2010). Metodología para medir y evaluar las capacidades tecnológicas de innovación aplicando sistemas de lógica difusa: Caso fábricas de software. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joao_Aguirre/publication/236159783_Modelo_p ara_medir_y_Evaluar_capacidades_de_Innovacion/links/0a85e539f542842e0e0000 00/Modelo-para-medir-y-Evaluar-capacidades-de-Innovacion.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong, C. E., & Shimizu, K. (2007). A Review of approaches to empirical research on the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 33(6), 959–986.spa
dc.relation.referencesAssefa, G., & Frostell, B. (2007). Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society, 29(1), 63– 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.007spa
dc.relation.referencesBarney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108spa
dc.relation.referencesBebbington, J., Brown, J., & Frame, B. (2007). Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.021spa
dc.relation.referencesBell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1995). The development of technological capabilities. In Trade, technology and international competitiveness (Vol. 22, Issue 4831, pp. 69–101). https://doi.org/10.1080/758539006spa
dc.relation.referencesBloemen, B., Jansen, M., Rijke, W., Oortwijn, W., & van der Wilt, G. J. (2021). Mixed claims in Health Technology Assessment: The case of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Social Science and Medicine, 270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113689spa
dc.relation.referencesBombard, Y., Abelson, J., Simeonov, D., & Gauvin, F.-P. (2011). Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach. Social Science and Medicine, 73(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.017spa
dc.relation.referencesBraun, E. (1998). Technology in context : technology assessment for managers. In The management of technology and innovation.spa
dc.relation.referencesCambrosio, A., & Limoges, C. (1991). Controversies as Governing Processes in Technology Assessment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(4), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329108524067spa
dc.relation.referencesCheng Guan, J., Ian, Yam, R. C. M., Mok, C. K., & Ma, N. (2004). A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.054spa
dc.relation.referencesColciencias. (2017). Las empresas de base tecnológica e innovación y su relación con los fondos de inversión de capital.spa
dc.relation.referencesColciencias. (2019). Centro de Estudios en Gobierno Digital y Movilidad. GrupLAC - Plataforma SCienTI - Colombia. https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000 011100spa
dc.relation.referencesConfecámaras. (2020). Dinámica de creación de empresas en Colombia: enero-junio de 2020. 15.spa
dc.relation.referencesConfecámaras. (2021a). Dinámica de creación de empresas en Colombia. In Confecámaras, Red de Cámaras de Comercio. Enero-marzo de 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesConfecámaras. (2021b). Resultados Encuesta de las Cámaras de Comercio de Seguimiento y Monitoreo del Impacto de la COVID-19 en el Sector Empresarialspa
dc.relation.referencesCongress on Technology Assessment. (1973). Technology assessment in search of an identity. Futures, 5(5), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(73)90045-1spa
dc.relation.referencesCoombs, J. E., & Bierly, P. E. (2006). Measuring technological capability and performance. R and D Management, 36(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467- 9310.2006.00444.Xspa
dc.relation.referencesDaim, T. U., & Intarode, N. (2009). A framework for technology assessment: Case of a Thai building material manufacturer. Energy for Sustainable Development, 13(4), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2009.10.006spa
dc.relation.referencesDas, S., & Wingender, P. (2021, March). La lenta reparación de las secuelas: El legado de la pandemia – Blog Dialogoafondo. Fondo Monetario Internacional.spa
dc.relation.referencesDomínguez R., J., Ramírez B., C., Murillo L., M., Restrepo S., L. M., & Guevara, J. S. (2017). Determinantes de la supervivencia empresarial en Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesDutrénit, G., Vera-Cruz, A. O., & Arias Navarro, A. (2003). Diferencias en el perfil de acumulación de capacidades tecnológicas en tres empresas mexicanas. El Trimestre Económico, 70(277), 109–165. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20856771spa
dc.relation.referencesEisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Special Issue: The Evolution of Firm Capabilities. Journal, 21(10), 1105–1121.spa
dc.relation.referencesEly, A., Van Zwanenberg, P., & Stirling, A. (2014). Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: Approaches to enhance international development, co- ordination and democratisation. Research Policy, 43(3), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.004spa
dc.relation.referencesEnzer, S. (1972). Cross-impact techniques in technology assessment. Futures, 4(1), 30– 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(72)90023-7spa
dc.relation.referencesFMI. (2021, April). Perspectivas de la economía mundial - Abril de 2021. Fondo Monetario Internacional.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Cano, C. M., & Valencia-Arias, J. A. (2020). Mecanismos utilizados para medir capacidades de innovación tecnológica en las organizaciones: resultados desde un análisis bibliométrico. Revista Guillermo de Ockham, 18(1), 69–79.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002a). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1–2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1spa
dc.relation.referencesGuston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002b). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1–2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1spa
dc.relation.referencesHelfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332spa
dc.relation.referencesHellström, T. (2003). Systemic innovation and risk: Technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 25(3), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1spa
dc.relation.referencesHenriksen, A. D. P. (1997a). A technology assessment primer for management of technology. International Journal of Technology Management, 13(5–6), 615–638. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.1997.001681spa
dc.relation.referencesHuff, S. L., & Munro, M. C. (1985). Information technology assessment and adoption: A field study. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 9(4), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/249233spa
dc.relation.referencesInnpulsa. (2019). Factores determinantes de la supervivencia y exportación de las empresas colombianas.spa
dc.relation.referencesKelly, M. P., & Moore, T. A. (2012). The judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment. Social Theory and Health, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2011.21spa
dc.relation.referencesLall, S. (1992). Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165–186.spa
dc.relation.referencesLeiblein, M. J. (2011). What Do Resource and Capability-Based Theories Propose? Article in Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311408321spa
dc.relation.referencesLemoine, C., Lemoine, P., Castro, J., Yaya, J., & Ruiz, A. (2017). Determinantes del crecimiento acelerado de las empresas en Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittenberg, B. (1992). Technology assessment in medicine. Academic Medicine, 67(7), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199207000-00002spa
dc.relation.referencesLockett, A., & Thompson, S. (2001). The resource-based view and economics.spa
dc.relation.referencesLu, I. Y., Chen, C. B., & Wang, C. H. (2007). Fuzzy multiattribute analysis for evaluating firm technological innovation capability. International Journal of Technology Management, 40(1–3), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2007.013530spa
dc.relation.referencesMajone, G. (1977). Technology assessment and policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 8(2), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712293spa
dc.relation.referencesMedford, R. D. (1973). Technology assessment: New forces likely to affect industrial marketing strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 2(3), 225–233.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeriño, D. E., & Ruiz, W. L. (2016). Evolución de la capacidad tecnológica para ponerse al día. In Congreso Internacional de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación (Vol. 5, pp. 1–20). Cogestec. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309589189spa
dc.relation.referencesMundial, B. (2021). Perspectivas económicas mundiales: América Latina y el Caribe.spa
dc.relation.referencesMusango, J. K., & Brent, A. C. (2011). A conceptual framework for energy technology sustainability assessment. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.10.005spa
dc.relation.referencesMusango, J. K., Brent, A. C., Amigun, B., Pretorius, L., & Müller, H. (2012). A system dynamics approach to technology sustainability assessment: The case of biodiesel developments in South Africa. Technovation, 32(11), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.003spa
dc.relation.referencesNadler, David., Tushman, Michael., & Nadler, M. B. (1997). Competing by Design : The Power of Organizational Architecture. Oxford University Press USA. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1413491spa
dc.relation.referencesOberkampf, V. (1978). Technology assessment: Need and motivation of industry. Long Range Planning, 11(4), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(78)90007-9spa
dc.relation.referencesONU. (2021). La recuperación de la economía mundial sigue siendo precaria, el repunte del 4,7 % apenas compensará las pérdidas sufridas en el año 2020 | ONU DAES | Naciones Unidas Departamento de Asuntos Económicos y Socialesspa
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz P., E., & Nagles G., N. (2013). Gestión de Tecnología e Innovación. Teoría, proceso y práctica. In Gestión de Tecnología e Innovación. Teoría, proceso y práctica. https://doi.org/10.21158/9789587562552spa
dc.relation.referencesPalm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002spa
dc.relation.referencesPaschen, H., & Gresser, K. (1974). Some remarks and proposals concerning the planning and performance of technology assessment studiesspa
dc.relation.referencesPenrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 596. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90295-2spa
dc.relation.referencesPeteraf, M. A. (1993). The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorted, A. L. (1995). Technology assessment. Impact Assessment, 13(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1995.9726087spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, S., Ruíz-Castañeda, W., Cubillos Jiménez, S., Marín Sánchez, B. M., Giraldo, D. P., & V ́élez Acosta, L. M. (2021). Medición de las capacidades tecnológicas para la innovación en los sistemas de conocimiento e innovación agrícola. Ciencia & Tecnología Agropecuaria, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol22_num1_art:1896spa
dc.relation.referencesQUIPUX. (2019). Lo Que Somos.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobledo V., J. (2020). Introducción a la gestión de la tecnología y la innovación empresarial.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobledo V., J., López G, C., Zapata L., W., & Perez V., J. D. (2010). Desarrollo de una Metodología de Evaluación de Capacidades de Innovación. Perfil de Coyuntura Económica, 15, 133–148spa
dc.relation.referencesRobledo V.; Jorge, Zambrano, J. J. A., & Pérez V., J. D. (2011). Methodological tool for measurement and assessment of technological innovation capabilities | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore. 2011 Proceedings of PICMET ’11:spa
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez, F. M. (2002). Un perfil de las capacidades tecnológicas en la industria de artes gráficas, imprentas y editoriales. Innovar, Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 20, 55–81.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosengren, H., & Palanivelu, D. (2021, January). En América Latina y el Caribe: el nuevo informe de la ONU advierte sobre una recuperación económica frágil e irregular | Comunicado de prensa | Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe.spa
dc.relation.referencesRothman, H. (1972). Report of the OECD seminar on technology assessment. R&D Management, 2(3), 143–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1972.tb00982.xspa
dc.relation.referencesSaaty, T. L. (2002). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Scientia Iranica, 9(3), 215–229.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwarz, M. (1993). The technological culture: Challenges for technology assessment and policy. Science and Public Policy, 20(6), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/20.6.381spa
dc.relation.referencesSegal, H. P. (1982). Assessing retrospective technology assessment: A review of the literature. Technology in Society, 4(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160- 791x(82)90020-3spa
dc.relation.referencesShrader-Frechette, K. S. (1980). Technology Assessment as Applied Philosophy of Science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 5(4), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398000500404spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, R. K. (2013). Prioritizing the factors for coordinated supply chain using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Meassuring Businness Excelence, 17(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041311311383spa
dc.relation.referencesTechnology assessment in search of an identity. First International Congress on Technology Assessment. (1973). Futures, 5(5), 506–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(73)90045-1spa
dc.relation.referencesTran, T. A., & Daim, T. (2008). A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(9), 1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.004spa
dc.relation.referencesVanclay, F. M., Russell, A. W., & Kimber, J. (2013). Enhancing innovation in agriculture at the policy level: The potential contribution of Technology Assessment. Land Use Policy, 31, 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.004spa
dc.relation.referencesVargas, L. (2020). Sector privado invierte 4% de ventas en innovación, 1,3 puntos porcentuales más que en 2017. La República. https://www.larepublica.co/especiales/campana-por-mi-empresa-yo/sector-privadoinvierte-4-de-ventas-en-innovacion-13-puntos-porcentuales-mas-que-en-2017- 3075567spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, C.-H., Lu, I.-Y., & Chen, C.-B. (2008). Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation, 28, 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007spa
dc.relation.referencesWernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, CINCO(2), 1–12. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.4250050207/abstractspa
dc.relation.referencesZhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.830spa
dc.relation.referencesZizlavsky, O. (2010). House of innovattion - holistic diagnostic approach to practises in innovation management. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia generalspa
dc.subject.lembInnovación tecnológica
dc.subject.otherGestión tecnológica
dc.subject.otherGestión de la innovación
dc.subject.proposalCapacidades tecnológicasspa
dc.subject.proposalDiagnóstico tecnológicospa
dc.subject.proposalGestión tecnológicaspa
dc.subject.proposalProceso de análisis jerárquicospa
dc.subject.proposalTechnological capabilitieseng
dc.subject.proposalTechnology assessmenteng
dc.subject.proposalTechnology managementeng
dc.subject.proposalAnalitic Hierarchy Processeng
dc.titleDiagnóstico tecnológico como herramienta de planeación estratégica. Caso de estudio: empresa de base tecnológicaspa
dc.title.translatedTechnological diagnosis as a strategic planning tool. Case study: technology-based companyeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentAdministradoresspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
1040744975.2022.pdf
Tamaño:
835.48 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis Maestría en en Ingeniería Administrativa
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Ingeniería Administrativa