Natural allelic diversity and signal responses associated with water deficit tolerance in Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja

dc.contributor.advisorMosquera Vasquez, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorDiaz Valencia, Paula Andrea
dc.contributor.researcherMelgarejo Luz Marina
dc.contributor.researchgroupGenética de Rasgos de Interés Agronómicospa
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T16:09:25Z
dc.date.available2022-06-14T16:09:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-08
dc.descriptionilustraciones, graficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractGenetic improvement of diploid potato (Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja) for water deficit tolerance and tuber yield is challenging because of the complex nature of these traits. In order to develop a research that cconsiders the complexity of the trait and simultaneously to make the experiments more tractable, we conducted two studies. The first was conducted to investigate the genetic architecture of the water deficit tolerance by employing the Working Collection of the Potato Breeding Program at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. A diversity panel of 104 diploid potato accessions were evaluated under both well-watered and water deficit treatments at tuber initiation stage. The response to water deficit conditions was assessed with the relative chlorophyll content (CC), the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), relative water content (RWC), leaf sugar content, tuber number per plant (TN), and tuber fresh weight per plant (TW). The phenotypic evaluation results revealed that the physiological, biochemical and yield-component variables had a broad variation, while the yield-component variables more powerfully distinguished between the tolerant and susceptible genotypes than the physiological and biochemical variables. The multivariate analysis based on the Drought Tolerance Index (DTI) revealed different levels of water deficit tolerance for the 104 genotypes. The Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) was conducted using a matrix of 47 K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), recently available for this population. We are reporting 38 Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL), seven for well-watered conditions, twenty-two for water deficit condition,s and nine for DTI which explain between 12.6% and 44.1% of the phenotypic variance. A set of 6 QTL were found to be associated with more than one variable. Of the nine QTL detected from DTI on chromosomes 2, 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12, three candidate genes with a feasible role in water deficit response were identified. These results provide a foundation for future research directed at understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying potato tolerance to water deficits, and the QTL identified could be used in marker-assisted selection (MAS) for water-deficit tolerance breeding in potato. In the second study, we investigated the physiological, biochemical and yield-related variables of four contrasting water-deficit tolerance diploid potato genotypes to water deficit with emphasis on temporal trend responses. Comparative analysis successfully identified that the physiological changes were faster and pronounced in the water-deficit sensitive genotypes. In contrast, in the tolerant genotypes water deficit induced earlier and more remarkable accumulation of sucrose and glucose. The observed temporal response showed that statistical differences between tolerant and sensitive genotypes in ψl, CC, and soluble sugar content can be distinguished from 3DAT. In general, the temporal variation in physiological and biochemical parameters demonstrated the presence of different strategies among tolerant genotypes. These results can contribute to a better understanding of the temporal physiological and biochemical mechanisms leading to water-deficit tolerance and will help potato breeding programs with improved stress tolerance and stable yields under changing climate conditions without the loss of yield potential under optimal conditions. The results of this study provide insights into the nature of genetic variations governing water deficit tolerance in diploid potato. Knowledge gained of the dissection may be utilized in breeding programs to select lines with improved yield and water deficit tolerance. Additionally, the information from the panel SNP polymorphisms and candidate gene detection provides research avenues to further refine/narrow down genomic regions associated with these agronomically important traits, and also opens gates for genetic enhancement through genomic aided selection.eng
dc.description.abstractEl mejoramiento genético de la papa diploide (Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja) para tolerancia al déficit de agua y rendimiento de tubérculos es un desafío debido a la naturaleza compleja de estos rasgos. Con el fin de desarrollar una investigación que considere la complejidad del rasgo y, al mismo tiempo, hacer que los experimentos sean más tratables, llevamos a cabo dos estudios. El primero se realizó para investigar la arquitectura genética de la tolerancia al déficit hídrico empleando la Colección de Trabajo del Programa de Mejoramiento de Papa de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Se evaluó un panel de diversidad de 104 accesiones diploides de papa bajo tratamientos de riego abundante y de déficit hídrico en la etapa de iniciación del tubérculo. La respuesta a condiciones de déficit hídrico se evaluó con el contenido relativo de clorofila (CC), la eficiencia cuántica máxima de PSII (Fv/Fm), el contenido relativo de agua (RWC), el contenido de azúcar foliar, el número de tubérculos por planta (TN) y el número de tubérculos. peso fresco por planta (PT). Los resultados de la evaluación fenotípica revelaron que las variables fisiológicas, bioquímicas y del componente de rendimiento tuvieron una amplia variación, mientras que las variables del componente de rendimiento distinguieron con mayor fuerza entre los genotipos tolerantes y susceptibles que las variables fisiológicas y bioquímicas. El análisis multivariado basado en el Índice de Tolerancia a la Sequía (DTI) reveló diferentes niveles de tolerancia al déficit hídrico para los 104 genotipos. Los estudios de asociación de todo el genoma (GWAS) se realizaron utilizando una matriz de polimorfismos de un solo nucleótido (SNP) de 47 K, disponible recientemente para esta población. Estamos reportando 38 Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL), siete para condiciones de riego abundante, veintidós para condiciones de déficit hídrico y nueve para DTI que explican entre el 12,6% y el 44,1% de la varianza fenotípica. Se encontró que un conjunto de 6 QTL estaba asociado con más de una variable. De los nueve QTL detectados de DTI en los cromosomas 2, 3, 5, 8, 10 y 12, se identificaron tres genes candidatos con un papel factible en la respuesta al déficit hídrico. Estos resultados proporcionan una base para futuras investigaciones dirigidas a comprender los mecanismos moleculares que subyacen a la tolerancia de la papa a los déficits de agua, y el QTL identificado podría usarse en la selección asistida por marcadores (MAS) para el mejoramiento de la papa con tolerancia al déficit de agua. En el segundo estudio, investigamos las variables fisiológicas, bioquímicas y relacionadas con el rendimiento de cuatro genotipos de papa diploide con tolerancia al déficit de agua que contrastan con el déficit de agua, con énfasis en las respuestas de tendencia temporal. El análisis comparativo identificó con éxito que los cambios fisiológicos fueron más rápidos y pronunciados en los genotipos sensibles al déficit de agua. En cambio, en los genotipos tolerantes el déficit hídrico indujo una acumulación más temprana y notable de sacarosa y glucosa. La respuesta temporal observada mostró que las diferencias estadísticas entre los genotipos tolerantes y sensibles en ψl, CC y contenido de azúcar soluble se pueden distinguir de 3DAT. En general, la variación temporal de los parámetros fisiológicos y bioquímicos demostró la presencia de diferentes estrategias entre los genotipos tolerantes. Estos resultados pueden contribuir a una mejor comprensión de los mecanismos fisiológicos y bioquímicos temporales que conducen a la tolerancia al déficit de agua y ayudarán a los programas de mejoramiento de la papa con una mejor tolerancia al estrés y rendimientos estables en condiciones climáticas cambiantes sin pérdida del potencial de rendimiento en condiciones óptimas. Los resultados de este estudio brindan información sobre la naturaleza de las variaciones genéticas que gobiernan la tolerancia al déficit hídrico en la papa diploide. El conocimiento adquirido de la disección se puede utilizar en programas de mejoramiento para seleccionar líneas con rendimiento mejorado y tolerancia al déficit de agua. Además, la información del panel de polimorfismos SNP y la detección de genes candidatos proporciona vías de investigación para refinar/reducir aún más las regiones genómicas asociadas con estos rasgos agronómicamente importantes, y también abre puertas para la mejora genética a través de la selección genómica asistida. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.description.methodsModelo de investigacion experimentalspa
dc.description.researchareagenetica de plantasspa
dc.description.sponsorshipColciencias convocatoria doctorado 727spa
dc.format.extent115 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81580
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Agronomíaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Agrarias - Doctorado en Ciencias Agrariasspa
dc.relation.indexedAgrovocspa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E, Theeuwen T, Oortwijn M, Visser R, Van der Linden G. Carbon partitioning mechanisms in potato under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020; 146:211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.019spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E, Oortwijn M, Theeuwen T, et al. Genetic mapping of tuber size distribution and marketable tuber yield under drought stress in potato. Euphytica. 2019; 215:189. doi:10.1007/s10681-019-25-08-0spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E, Oortwijn M, Theeuwen M, Bachem B, Visser F, Van der Linden G. Drought response in field grown potatoes and the interactions between canopy growth and yield. Agric. Wat. Man. 2018; 206:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.013spa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez M, Angarita M, Delgado M, García C, Jiménez-Gomez J, et al. Identification of novel associations of candidate genes with resistance to late blight in Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja, Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8: 1040. doi: 10.3389/flps.2017.01040spa
dc.relation.referencesAndleeb T, Shah T, Nawaz R, Munir I, Munsi, F, et al. QTL mapping for drought stress tolerance in plants. Salt and drought stress tolerance in plants. 2020; 383-403. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40277-8_16spa
dc.relation.referencesAnithakumari A, Dolstra O, Vosman B, Visser R. In vitro screening and QTL analysis for drought tolerance in diploid potato. Euphytica. 2011; 181: 357-369.doi: 10.1007/s10681-011-0446-6spa
dc.relation.referencesAnithakumari A, Nataraja K, Visser R, van der Linden C. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance and recovery potential by quantitative trait locus mapping of a diploid potato population. Mol. Breeding. 2012; 30(3):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11032-012-9728-5spa
dc.relation.referencesAraus J, Kefauver S, Zaman-Allah M, Olsen M, Cairns, J. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends Plant Sci.2018, 23: 451–466. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001spa
dc.relation.referencesAriza W, Rodríguez L, Moreno D, Guerrero C, Moreno L. Effect of water deficit on some physiological and biochemical responses the yellow diploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L. group Phureja). Agron. Colomb. 2020; 38 (1): 36-44. doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v38n1.78982spa
dc.relation.referencesBasu S, Ramegowda V, Kumar A, Pereira A. Plant adaptation to stress. F1000Res. 2016; 5: F1000 Faculty Rev-1554. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7678.1spa
dc.relation.referencesBerdugo-Cely J, Valbuena R, Sánchez-Betancourt E, Barrero L, Yockteng R. Genetic diversity and association mapping in the Colombian Central Collection of Solanum tuberosum L. Andigenum group using SNPs markers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173039spa
dc.relation.referencesBonilla M, CardozoF, Morale A. Agenda prospectiva de investigación y desarrollo tecnológico para la cadena productiva de la papa en Colombia con énfasis en papa criolla, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 2009.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrachi B, Morris G, Borevitz J. Genome-wide association studies in plants: the missing heritability is in the field. Genome Biol.2011, 12, 232. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-232spa
dc.relation.referencesByrne S; Meade F; Mesiti F; Griffin D; Kennedy C, Milbourne, D. Genome-Wide Association and Genomic Prediction for Fry Color in Potato. Agronomy .2020, 10, 90. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10010090spa
dc.relation.referencesChen D, Neumann K, Friedel S, Kilian B, Chen M, Altmann T. Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growth and drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis. Plant Cell.2014, 26: 4636–4655. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.129601spa
dc.relation.referencesDemirel U, Morris W, Ducreux L, Yavuz C, Asim A, et al. Physiological, biochemical and transcriptional responses to single and combined abiotic stress in stress-tolerant and stress-sensitive potato genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020; 11:169. Doi: 10.3389/flps.2020.00169spa
dc.relation.referencesDevaux A, Goffart J, Kromann P. Potato of the future: Opportunities and challenges in sustainable Agri-food systems. Potato Res. 2021; 64:681-720. doi: 10.1007/s11540-021-09501-4spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz P, Evaluación de la tolerancia al estrés hídrico en genotipos de papa criolla (Solanum Phureja Juz et Buk). Master degree thesis. 2016. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.102spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte D, Narváez C, Restrepo L, Kushalappa A, Mosquera T. Development and validation of liquid chromatographic method to quantify sucrose, glucose and fructose of Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. J. Chromatogr. B. 2015, 975,18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.10.039spa
dc.relation.referencesEstrada N, 2000. La biodiversidad en el mejoramiento genético de la papa. Centro de Información para el desarrollo, La Paz, Bolivia. PROINPA/CID/CIP Potatoes, 272.spa
dc.relation.referencesEstrada N, 1996. Los recursos genéticos en el mejoramiento de la papa en los países Andinos, in: Papas Colombianas Con El Mejor Entorno Ambiental. UNIPAPA-ICA-CORPOICA.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAOSTAT. Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2019. Production: Crops. http://faostast.fao.orgspa
dc.relation.referencesFriedli M, Kirchgessner,N, Grieder C, Liebisch F, Mannale M, Walter, A. Terrestrial 3D laser scanning to track the increase in canopy height of both monocot and dicot crop species under field conditions. Plant Methods .2016, 12: 1–15spa
dc.relation.referencesFurbank R, and Tester M. Phenomics – technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trend Plant Sci. 2011, 16: 635–644. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.005spa
dc.relation.referencesGervais T, Creelman A, Li X, Bizimungu B, De Koeyer D, et al. Potato response to drought stress: physiological and growth basis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021; 12:1630 .doi: 10.3389/flsp.2021.698060spa
dc.relation.referencesGhislain M, Andrade D, Rodriguez F, Hijmans R, Spooner D. Genetic analysis of the cultivated potato L. Phureja group using RADPs and nuclear SSRs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006; 113(8):1515-1527. doi:10.1007/s00122-006-0399-7spa
dc.relation.referencesGitari H, Nyawabe S, Kamau S, Karanja N, Raza M, et al. Revisiting intercropping indices with respect to potato-legume intercropping systems. Field Crops Res. 2020; 258:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107957spa
dc.relation.referencesHill D, Nelson D, Hammond J, Bell L. Morphophysiology of potato (Solanum tuberosum) in response to drought stress: paving the way forward. Front. Plant Sci. 2021; 15:675690. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.675690spa
dc.relation.referencesJamann T, Balint-Kurti p, Holland J. QTL mapping using high-throughput sequencing. In: Alfonso J., Stepanova A. (eds). Plant functional genomics. Methods in molecular biology. 2015; 1284. Humana Press, New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2444-8_13spa
dc.relation.referencesJoshi M, Fogelman E, Belausov E, Ginzberg I. Potato root system development and factors that determine its arquitecture. J. Plant Physiol. 2016;205:113-123. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2016.08.14spa
dc.relation.referencesJuyó D, Soto J, Ballvora A, León J, Mosquera T. Novel organ-specific genetic factors for quantitative resistance to late blight in potato. PloS ONE. 2019; 14(7), e0213818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213818spa
dc.relation.referencesJuyó D., Sarmiento F., Alvarez M., Brochero H., Cortes H., Gebhart C. Genetic diversity and population structure in dipliod potatotes. Crop. Sci. 2015;55:760–769. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0524.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan M, Saravia D, Munive S, Lozano F, Farfan E, et al. Multiple QTLs linked to agro-morphological and physiological traits related to drought tolerance in potato. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015; 33:1286-1298. doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-0824-zspa
dc.relation.referencesKlaasen , Willemsem J, Vos P, et al., Genome-wide association in tetraploid potato reveals four QTLs for protein content. Mol. Breeding.2019, 39:151. Doi:10.1007/s11032-019-1070-8spa
dc.relation.referencesKohl K, Aneley G, Hass M, Peters R. Confounding factors in container-based drought tolerance assessments in Solanum tuberosum. Agronomy.2021,11:865. doi:10.3390/agronomy11050865spa
dc.relation.referencesLi N, Gao D, Zhou X, Chen S, Li C, et al. Intercropping with Potato-Onion enhanced the soil microbial diversity of tomato. Microorganisms. 2020; 8:834. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8060834spa
dc.relation.referencesLopes M, Reynolds M. Stay-green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3789–3798. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers071spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez I, Muñoz M, Acuña I, Uribe M. Evaluating the drought tolerance of seven potato varieties on volcanic ash soils in a medium-term trial. Front. Plant Sci. 2021; 12:1238. doi:10.3389/flps.2021.693060spa
dc.relation.referencesMontes J, Technow F, Dhillon B, Mauch F, Melchinger A. High-throughput non-destructive biomass determination during early plant development in maize under field conditions. Field Crops Res.2011, 121: 268–273. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.017spa
dc.relation.referencesNarváez C, Peña C, Restrepo L, Kushalappa A, Mosquera T. Macronutrient contents of potato genotype collections in the Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018;66:179–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.12.019spa
dc.relation.referencesNasir N, Toth Z. Effect of drought stress on potato production. A review. Agronomy. 2022; 12:635.doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030635spa
dc.relation.referencesParra M., Piñeros C., Soto J., Mosquera T. Chromosomes I and X harbor consistent genetic factors associated with anthocyanin variation in potato. Agronomy. 2019;10:366. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9070366.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeña C, Sanchez L, Kushalappa A, Rodriguez L, Mosquera T, et al. Nutritional contents of advanced breeding clones of Solanum tuberosum group Phureja. LWT. 2015;62:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.01.038.spa
dc.relation.referencesPino, T. Estrés hídrico y térmico en papas, avances y protocolos. Santiago, Chile. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. 2016, Boletín INIA Nº 331. 148pspa
dc.relation.referencesPiñeros C, Narvaéz C, Kushalappa A, Mosquera T. Hydroxycinnamic acids in cooked potato tubers from Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;5:1–10. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.403spa
dc.relation.referencesPlich J, Boguszewska-Mańkowska D, Marczewski W. Relations between photosynthetic parameters and drought-induced tuber yield decrease in Katahdin-derived potato cultivars. Pot. Res. 2020; 63: 463–477. doi: 10.1007/s11540-020-09451-3spa
dc.relation.referencesPotato Genome Sequencing Consortium (PGSC). Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature. 2011; 475:189–195. doi: 10.1038/nature10158spa
dc.relation.referencesPrashar,A, Yildiz J, Mcnicol J, Bryan G, Jones H. Infra-red thermography for high throughput field phenotyping in Solanum tuberosum. 2013, PLoS One 8:e65816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065816spa
dc.relation.referencesPrashar A, and Jones G. Infra-red thermography as a high-throughput tool for field phenotyping. Agronomy. 2014, 4: 397–417. doi: 10.3390/agronomy4030397spa
dc.relation.referencesPuértolas J, Ballester C, Elphinstone D, Dodd I. Two potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties differ in drought due to differences in root growth at depth. Funct. Plant Biol. 2014;41:1107-1118. doi: 10.1071/FP14105spa
dc.relation.referencesQin J, Bian C, Liu J, Zhang J, Jin L. An efficient greenhouse method to screen potato genotypes for drought tolerance. Sci Hortic. 2019; 253:61-69. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.017spa
dc.relation.referencesRafalski, J. Association genetics in crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.2010; 13: 174–180.doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.004spa
dc.relation.referencesRichards R, Rebetzke G, Watt M, Condon A, Spielmeyer W, Dolferus, R. Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Funct. Plant Biol.2010. 37: 85–97. doi: 10.1071/F.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez L, Ñustez C, Estrada N. Criolla Latina, Criolla Paisa and Criolla Colombia, new cultivars of “diploid potato” for the province of Antioquia (Colombia). Agron. Colomb.2009, 27, 289–303.spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero A, Alarcón A, Valbuena R, Galeano C. Physiological assessment of water stress in potato using spectral information. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1608. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01608spa
dc.relation.referencesRudack K, Seddig S, Sprenger H, Kohl K, Uptmoor R. Drought stress-induced changes in starch yield and physiological traits in potato. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2017;203 (6):494-505.doi:10.1111/jac.12224spa
dc.relation.referencesSchafleitner R, Gutierrez R, Espino R, Gaudin A, Perez J, et al. Field screening for variation of drought tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. by agronomical, physiological and genetic analysis. Potato Res. 2007;50:71-85spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumacher C, Krannich C, Maletzki L, Kohl K, Kopka J, et al. Unravelling differences in candidate genes for drought tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by use of new functional microsatellite markers. Genes. 2021;12:494. Doi:10.3390/genes12040494spa
dc.relation.referencesSoltys-Kalina D, Plich J, Strzelczyk-Żyta D, Śliwka J, Marczewski, W. The effect of drought stress on the leaf relative water content and tuber yield of a half-sib family of ‘Katahdin’-derived potato cultivars. Breed Sci- 2016; 66: 328–331. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.66.328spa
dc.relation.referencesSpooner D, Rodriguez F, Polgar Z, Ballard H, Janshky S. Genomic origins of potato polyploids: GBSSI Gene Sequencing Data .Crop Sci. 2008; 48(S1): 27-36. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0504tpgspa
dc.relation.referencesSpooner D, Ñúñez J, Trujillo G, Herrera M, Guzmán F, et al. Extensive simple sequence repeat genotyping of potato landraces supports a major reevaluation of their gene pool structure and classification. Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. 2007.104:19398-19403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709796104spa
dc.relation.referencesStraadt I, Rasmussen O. AFLP analysis of Solanum phureja DNA introgressed into potato dihaploids. Plant Breed. 2003;122:352-356. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.000878xspa
dc.relation.referencesTagliotti M, Deperi S, Bedogni M, Huarte M. Genome-wide association analysis of agronomical and physiological traits linked to drought tolerance in a diverse potatoes (Solanum tuberosum )panel. Plant Breed.2021: 0:1-11. doi:10.1111/pbr.12938spa
dc.relation.referencesTorrance L, Cowan G, McLean K, MacFarlene S, et al. Natural resistance to Potato virus Y in Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020.; 133:967-980. Doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03521-yspa
dc.relation.referencesTuberosa, R. Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3:347. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00347spa
dc.relation.referencesUnited Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Report. The real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. New York, NY: UNDP, 20th Anniversary Edition, 2010spa
dc.relation.referencesYang G, Yang X, Zhang X, Li Z, Liu Z, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing for field-based crop phenotyping: current status and perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8:1111. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01111spa
dc.relation.referencesWang F, Zou M, Zhao L, Xia Z, Wang J. Genome wide association mapping of late blight tolerance trait in potato (Solanum tuberosum L. )Frontiers Sci. 2021,12. Doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.714575spa
dc.relation.referencesWang Y, Rashid M, Li X, Yao C, Lu L, Bai J. et al. Collection and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Potato Landraces and Varieties in China. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 139spa
dc.relation.referencesWang X, Singh, D, Marla S, Morris G, Poland, J. Field-based high-throughput phenotyping of plant height in sorghum using different sensing technologies. Plant Methods.2018, 14:1–16. doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2020.3039179spa
dc.relation.referencesWijesinha-Bettoni R, Mouille B. The contribution of potatoes to global food security, nutrition and healthy diets. Am. J. Potato Res. 2019; 96:139-149. doi: 10.1007/s12230-018-09697-1spa
dc.relation.referencesZaki H, Radwan K. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars to drought stress under invitro and field conditions. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2020; 9:1. doi:10.1186/s40538-021-00266-zspa
dc.relation.referencesZhang F, Qu L, Gu Y. et al. Resequencing and genome-wide association studies of autotetraploid potato. Mol Horticulture.2022, 2, 6.doi:10.1186/s43897-022-00027-yspa
dc.relation.referencesZarzynska K, Boguszewska-Mankowska D, Nosalewicz A. Differences in size and architecture of the potato cultivars root system and their tolerance to drought stress. Plant Soil Environ. 2017; 63 (4):159-164. doi:10.17221/4/2017-PSEspa
dc.relation.referencesNikolaou G., Neocleous D., Christou A., Kitta E., Katsoulas N. Implementing sustainable irrigation in water-scarce regions under the impact of climate change. Agronomy. 2020;10:1120. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10081120.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen X., Wang L., Niu Z., Zhang M., Li C., Li J. The effects of projected climate change and extreme climate on maize and rice in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020;282–283:107867. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107867.spa
dc.relation.referencesMukherjee D. Stochastic model for crop water stress during agricultural droughts. Eng. Rep. 2019;1:1–24. doi: 10.1002/eng2.12081.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamaoui M., Jemo M., Datla R., Bekkaoui F. Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Front. Chem. 2018;6:26. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00026.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO World Corp Production Statistics. [(accessed on 26 May 2020)];2018 Available online: http//faostat.fao.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesSprenger H., Rudack K., Schudoma C., Neumann A., Seddig S., Peter R., Zuther E., Kopka J., Hincha D., Walther D., et al. Assessment of drought tolerance and its potential yield in potato. Funct. Plant Biol. 2015;42:655–667. doi: 10.1071/FP15013spa
dc.relation.referencesObidiegwu J., Bryan G., Jones H., Prashar A. Coping with drought: Stress and adaptive response in potato and perspective for improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2015;6:542. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00542.spa
dc.relation.referencesHijmans R. The effect of climate change on global potato production. Am. J. Potato Res. 2003;80:271–279. doi: 10.1007/BF02855363.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones P., Lister D., Jaggard K., Pidgeon J. Future climate impact on the productivity of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Europe. Clim. Chang. 2003;58:93–108. doi: 10.1023/A:1023420102432.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonneveux P., Ramirez D., Pino M. Drought tolerance in potato (S. tuberosum) Can we learn from drought tolerance research in cereals. Plant Sci. 2013;205–206:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.01.011spa
dc.relation.referencesHirut B., Shimelis H., Fentahum M., Bonierbale M., Gastelo M., Asfaw A. Combining ability of highland tropic adapted potato for tuber and yield components under drought. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0181541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181541.spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero A., Alarcon A., Galeano C. Physiological assessment of water stress in potato using spectral information. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1608. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01608.spa
dc.relation.referencesRolando J., Ramírez D., Yactayo W., Monneveux P., Quiroz R. Leaf greenness as a drought tolerance related trait in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015;110:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E., Theeuwen T., Oortwijn M., Visser R., Van der Linden G. Carbon partitioning mechanisms in potato under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020;146:211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.019.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnithakumari A., Nataraja K., Visser R., Van der Linden C. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance and recovery potential by quantitative trait locus mapping of a diploid potato population. Mol. Breed. 2012;30:1413–1429. doi: 10.1007/s11032-012-9728-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchafleitner R., Gutiérrez R., Espino R., Gaudin A., Perez J., Martínez M., Domínguez A. Field screening for variation of drought tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. Agronomical, physiological and genetic analysis. Potato Res. 2007;50:71–85. doi: 10.1007/s11540-007-9030-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesDien D., Mochizuki T., Yamakawa T. Effect of various drought stress and subsequent recovery on proline, total soluble sugar and starch metabolisms in rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Plant Prod. Sci. 2019;22:530–545. doi: 10.1080/1343943X.2019.1647787.spa
dc.relation.referencesShi S., Fan M., Iwama K., Li F., Zhang Z., Jia L. Physiological basis of drought tolerance in potato grown under long-term water deficiency. Int. J. Plant. Prod. 2015;9:305–320. doi: 10.22069/IJPP.2015.2050.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang S., Xu X., Sun Y., Zhang J., Li C. Influence of drought hardening on the resistance physiology of potato seedlings under drought stress. J. Integr. Agric. 2018;17:336–347. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61758-1.spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E., Oortwijn R., Theeuwen T., Bachem C., Visser R., Van der Linden G. Drought response in field grown potatoes and the interactions between canopy growth and yield. Agric. Water Manag. 2018;206:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.013.spa
dc.relation.referencesQin J., Bian C., Liu J., Zhang J., Jin L. An efficient greenhouse method to screen potato genotypes for drought tolerance. Sci. Hortic. 2019;253:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.017.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez C., Rolando J., Yactayo W., Monneveux P., Mares V., Quiroz R. Improving potato drought tolerance through the induction of long-term water stress memory. Plant Sci. 2015;282:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.05.016.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoguzsewska-Mankowska D., Pieczynski M., Wyrzykowska A., Kalaji H., Sieczko L., Szweykowska-kulinska Z., Zagdanska B. Divergent strategies displayed by potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars to cope with soil drought. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2017;204:13–30. doi: 10.1111/jac.12245.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi X., Ramirez D., Qin J., Dormatey R., Bi Z., Sun C., Wang H., Bai J. Water restriction scenarios and their effects in traits in potato with different degrees of drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2019;256:108525. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.052.spa
dc.relation.referencesCabello R., Chujoy E., Mendiburu F., Bonierbale M., Monnevuex P. Large-scale evaluation of potatoes improved varieties, pre-breeding material and landraces for drought tolerance. Am. J. Potato Res. 2012;89:400–410. doi: 10.1007/s12230-012-9260-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesTardieu F. Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: Just design the right drought scenario. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:25–31. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err269.spa
dc.relation.referencesJuyó D., Sarmiento F., Alvarez M., Brochero H., Cortes H., Gebhart C. Genetic diversity and population structure in dipliod potatotes. Crop. Sci. 2015;55:760–769. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0524.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpooner D., Ñúñez J., Trujillo G., Herrera M., Guzmán F., Ghislain M. Extensive simple sequence repeats genotypes of potato landraces support a major reevaluation of their gene pool structure and classification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:19398–19403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709796104.spa
dc.relation.referencesEstrada N. Papas Colombianas con el Mejor Entorno Ambiental. UNIPAPA-ICA-CORPOICA; Bogotá, Colombia: 1996. Los recursos genéticos en el mejoramiento de la papa en los países andinos; pp. 1–14.spa
dc.relation.referencesMosquera T., Del Castillo S., Gálvez D. Breeding differently: Participatory selection and scaling up innovations in Colombia. Potato Res. 2017;60:361–381. doi: 10.1007/s11540-018-9389-9spa
dc.relation.referencesJuyó D., Soto J., Ballvora A., Léon J., Mosquera T. Novel organ-specific genetic factor for quantitative resistance to late blight in potato. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213818spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez L., Zuluaga C., Cotes J. Evaluación de la resistencia a la sarna polvosa en genotipos bajo condiciones controladas a partir de tubérculos semillas. RFCB. 2014;11:9–19. doi: 10.18359/rfcb.378spa
dc.relation.referencesPeña C., Sanchez L., Kushalappa A., Rodriguez L., Mosquera T., Nárvaez C. Nutritional contents of advanced breeding clones of Solanum tuberosum group Phureja. LWT. 2015;62:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.01.038.spa
dc.relation.referencesNarváez C., Peña C., Restrepo L., Kushalappa A., Mosquera T. Macronutrient contents of potato genotype collections in the Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018;66:179–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.12.019.spa
dc.relation.referencesÑúztes C. Estudios Fenotípicos y Genéticos Asociados a la Calidad de Fritura en Solanum tuberosum Phureja Juz et Buk. [Online]. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2011. [(accessed on 10 June 2020)]; Available online: http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/4318/spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte D., Ñústez C., Narváez C., Restrepo L., Melo S., Sarmiento F., Kushalappa A., Mosquera T. Natural variation of sucrose, glucose and fructose contents in Colombian genotypes of Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja at harvest. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016;96:4288–4294. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7783.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiñeros C., Narvaéz C., Kushalappa A., Mosquera T. Hydroxycinnamic acids in cooked potato tubers from Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;5:1–10. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.403.spa
dc.relation.referencesParra M., Piñeros C., Soto J., Mosquera T. Chromosomes I and X harbor consistent genetic factors associated with anthocyanin variation in potato. Agronomy. 2019;10:366. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9070366.spa
dc.relation.referencesLichtenthaler H. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Pigments of Photosynthetic Biomembrans. Method. Enzymol. 1987;148:350–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-687948036-1.spa
dc.relation.referencesLozano P., Sarmiento F., Mejía L., Álvarez F., Melgarejo L. Physiological, biochemical and transcriptional responses of Passiflora edulis f. edulis under progressive drought stress. Sci. Hortic. 2021;275:109655. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109655.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu F., Jensena C., Shahanzaria A., Andersenb M., Jacobsen S. ABA regulated stomatal control and photosynthetic water use efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during progressive soil drying. Plant Sci. 2005;168:831–836. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.10.016spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte D., Narváez C., Restrepo L., Kushalappa A., Mosquera T. Development and validation of liquid chromatographic method to quantify sucrose, glucose and fructose of Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. J. Chromatogr. B. 2015;975:18–23.spa
dc.relation.referencesFernandez G. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. In: Kuo C.G., editor. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress; Taipei, Taiwan. 13–16 August 1992; Tainan, Taiwan: AVRDC Publication; 1992. pp. 257–270.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlum A. Osmotic adjustment is a prime drought stress adaptive engine in support of plant production. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40:4–10. doi: 10.1111/pce.12800.spa
dc.relation.referencesFabregas N., Fernie A. The metabolic response to drought. J. Expt. Bot. 2019:7010771085. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery437.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaservafaei S., Sohrabi Y., Moradi P., Sweeny E., Mastinu A. Biological Response of Lallemantia iberica to Brassinolide Treatment under Different Watering Conditions. Plants. 2021;10:496. doi: 10.3390/plants10030496.spa
dc.relation.referencesBatool T., Ali S., Seleiman M. Plant growth promoting rhizobacterium alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:16975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73489-z.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarcek T., Hamow K., Végh B., Janda T., Darko E. Metabolic response to drought in six winter wheat genotypes. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0212411.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuo R., Shi L., Jiao Y., Li M., Zhong X., Gu F., Liu Q., Xia X., Li H. Metabolic response to drought stress in the tissues of drought–tolerant and drought-sensitive wheat genotype seedlings. AoB Plants. 2018;10:ply016. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/ply016.spa
dc.relation.referencesRonquim C., Prado C., Souza J. Growth, photosynthesis and leaf water potential in young plants of Capaifera langsdorffi Desf. (Caesalpiniacea) under contrasting irradiances. Braz. Soc. Plant Phys. 2019;23:197–208. doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202009000300004.spa
dc.relation.referencesDos Santos C., Verissimo V., Wanderley-Filho H., Ferreira V., Cavalcante P., Rolim E., Endress L. Seasonal variations of photosynthesis, gas Exchange, quantum efficiency of photosystem II and biochemical responses of Jatropha curcas L. grown in semi-humid and semi-arid areas subject to water stress. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013;41:203–213. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.003.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker N. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008;59:89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez L., Ñústez C., Moreno L. Drought stress affect physiological parameters but not tuber yield in three Andean potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars. Agron.Colomb. 2017;35:158–170. doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n2.65901spa
dc.relation.referencesKapoor D., Bhardwaj S., Landi M., Sharma A., Ramakrishna M., Sharma A. The impact of drought in plants metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:5692. doi: 10.3390/app10165692.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez D., Yactayo W., Gutiérrez R., Mares V., De Mendiburu F., Posadas A. Chlorophyll concentration in leaves is an indicator of potato tuber yield in water-shortage conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2014;168:202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.01.036.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlich J., Boguszewska-Mankowska D., Marczewski W. Relations between photosynthetic parameters and drought-induced tuber yield decrease in Katahdin-derived potato cultivars. Potato Res. 2020;63:463–477. doi: 10.1007/s11540-020-09451-3.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoltys- Kalina D., Plich J., Marczewski W. The effect of drought stress on the leaf relative water content and tuber yield of a half-sib family of “Katahdin”- derived potato cultivars. Breed. Sci. 2016;66:328–331. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.66.328.spa
dc.relation.referencesRudack K., Seddig S., Sprenger H., Kohl K., Uptmoor R., Ordon F. Drought stress-induced changes in starch yield and physiological traits in potato. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2017:1–12. doi: 10.1111/jac.12224.spa
dc.relation.referencesCabello R., Monneveux P., Bonierbale M., Khan M. Heritability of yield components under irrigated and drought conditions in Andigenum potatoes. Am. J. Potato Res. 2014;91:492–499. doi: 10.1007/s12230-014-9379-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesBadr A., El-Shazly H., Tarawneh R., Borner A. Screening for drought tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm using germination and seedling traits under simulated drought conditions. Plants. 2020;9:565. doi: 10.3390/plants9050565.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeuvax A, Kromann P, Ortiz O. Potatoes for sustainable global food security. Potato Res. 2014; 57:185–199.doi: 10.1007/s11540-014-9265-1spa
dc.relation.referencesFAOSTAT. In: FAOSTAT [Internet]. 2020 [cited 24 Oct 2020]. Available: http://www.fao. org/faostat/en/#homespa
dc.relation.referencesNarvaéz-Cuenca C, Peña C, Restrepo L, Kushalappa A. Macronutrient contents of potato genotype collections in the Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018; 66:179-184. doi: 0.1016/j.jfca.2017.12.019spa
dc.relation.referencesPeña C, Restrepo L, Kushalappa A, Rodríguez L, Mosquera T, Narvaéz-Cuenca. Nutritional contents of advanced breeding clones of Solanum tuberosum group Phureja. LWT. 2015; 62:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.01.038spa
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz O, Mares V. The historical, social, and economic importance of the potato crop. Kumar Chakrabarti S, Xie C, Kumar Tiwari J. (eds). 2017.The Potato Genome. Compendium of plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66135-3_1spa
dc.relation.referencesMonneveux P, Ramírez D, Pino M. Drought tolerance in potato (S. Tuberosum L.): can we learn from drought tolerance research in cereals? Plant Sci. 2013; 205:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.01.011spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E, Oortwijn M, Theeuwen T, Bachem C, Visser R, et al. Drought response in field grown potatoes and the interactions between canopy growth and yield. Agric. Water Mang. 2018; 206: 20-30.doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.013spa
dc.relation.referencesBinod P, Bhim B, Duryodhan C, Bishu P, Sung J, et al. Growth and yield characters of potato genotypes grown in drought and irrigated conditions of Nepal. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015; 3: 513-519.doi: 10.3126/ijasbt. v3i3.13347spa
dc.relation.referencesCabello R, De Mendiburu F, Bonierbale M, Monneveux P, Roca W, et al. Large-scale evaluation of potato improved varieties, genetic stocks and landraces for drought tolerance. Am. J. Potato Res. 2012; 89: 400–410.doi: 10.1007/s12230-012-9260-5spa
dc.relation.referencesO'Neill B, Oppenheimer, Warren R. et al. IPCC reasons for concern regarding climate change risks. Nature Clim. Change. 2017; 7: 28-37. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3179spa
dc.relation.referencesIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)].2014; IPCC, Geneva, Switzerlandspa
dc.relation.referencesRaymundo R, Asseng S, Robertson R, Petsakos A, Hoogenboom G, et al. Climate change impact on global potato production. Eur. J. Agron. 2018; 100:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.008spa
dc.relation.referencesDaryanto S, Wang L, Jacinthe P. Drought effects on root and tuber production: a meta-analysis. Agric Water Manag. 2016; 176,122–131.doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.019spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan M, Saravia D, Munive S, Lozano F, Farfan E, et al. Multiple QTLs linked to agro-morphological and physiological traits related to drought tolerance in potato. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015; 33:1286-1298. doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-08-24zspa
dc.relation.referencesPotato Genome Sequencing Consortium (PGSC). Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature. 2011; 475:189–195. doi: 10.1038/nature10158spa
dc.relation.referencesJuyó D, Soto J, Ballvora A, León J, Mosquera T. Novel organ-specific genetic factors for quantitative resistance to late blight in potato. PloS ONE. 2019; 14(7), e0213818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213818spa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez M, Angarita M, Delgado M, García C, Jiménez J, et al. Identification of novel associations of candidate genes with resistance to late blight in Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. Front. Plant Sci. 2017; 8,1040. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01040. eCollection 2017spa
dc.relation.referencesLi J, Lindqvist-Kreuze H, Tian Z, Song B, Landeo J, et al. Conditional QTL underlying resistance to late blight in a diploid potato population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012; 124: 1339-1350.doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1791-0spa
dc.relation.referencesBraun S, Endelman J, Haynes K, Jansky S. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to common scab and cold-induced sweeting in diploid potato. Plant Genome. 2017; 10:1-9. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2016.10.0110spa
dc.relation.referencesParra M, Piñeros C, Soto J, Mosquera T. Chromosomes I and X harbor consistent genetic factors associated with anthocyanin variation in potato. Agronomy. 2019; 10(4): 532. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9070366spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte D, Juyó D, Gebhardt C, Sarmiento F, Mosquera T. Novel SNP markers in InvGE and Sssl genes are associated with natural variation of sugar contents and friyng color in Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. BMC Genetics. 2017; 18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0489-3spa
dc.relation.referencesObidiegwe J, Bryan G, Jones H, Prashar A. Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 542. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00542spa
dc.relation.referencesAnithakumari A, Dolstra O, Vosman B, Visser R. In vitro screening and QTL analysis for drought tolerance in diploid potato. Euphytica. 2011; 181: 357-369.doi: 10.1007/s10681-011-0446-6spa
dc.relation.referencesAnithakumari A, Nataraja K, Visser R, van der Linden C. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance and recovery potential by quantitative trait locus mapping of a diploid potato population. Mol. Breeding. 2012; 30(3):1–17.doi: 10.1007/s11032-012-9728-5spa
dc.relation.referencesKorte A, Farlow A. The advantages and limitations of traits with GWAS: a review: Plant Methods. 2013; 9: 29.doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-29spa
dc.relation.referencesAlqudah A, Sallam A, Baenziger S, Borner A. GWAS: Fast-forwarding gene identification and characterization in temperate Cereals: Lessons from barley- A review. J. Adv. Res. 2019; 22:119-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.10.013spa
dc.relation.referencesCortes L, Zhang A, Yu J. Status and prospects of genome-wide association studies in plants. The plant genome. 2021;14(1): e20077. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20077spa
dc.relation.referencesThabet S, Moursi Y, Karam M, Borner A, Alqudah M. Natural variation uncovers candidate genes for barley spikelet number and grain yield under drought stress. Gene. 2020;11: 533. doi:10.3390/genes11050533spa
dc.relation.referencesDos Santos Silva P, Sousa P, De Oliveira E. Genome-wide association study of drought tolerance in cassava. Euphytica. 2021; 217:60. doi:10.1007/s10681-021-02800-4spa
dc.relation.referencesChen L, Fang Y, Li X, Zeng K, Chen H, et al. Identification of soybean drought-tolerant genotypes and loci correlated with agronomic traits contributes new candidate genes for breeding. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020; 102:109-122. doi: 10.1001/s11103-0.19-00934-7spa
dc.relation.referencesGizaw S, Godoy J, Pumphrey M, Carter A. Spectral reflectance for indirect selection and genome-wide association analyses of grain yield and drought tolerance in north America spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2018; 58 (6): 2289-2301. doi:10.2135/cropsci2017.11.0690spa
dc.relation.referencesFernandez G. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. In: Kuo CG (ed.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Tainan: AVRDC Publication.1992; 257–270. doi: 10.22001/wvc.72511spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz P, Melgarejo L, Arcila I, Mosquera T. Physiological, biochemical and yield-component responses of Solanum tuberosum L. Group Phureja genotypes to a water deficit. Plants. 2021; 10(4):634. doi: 10.3390/plants10040638spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu Y, Zeng Y, Yuanming L, Liu Z, Lin-Wang K, et al. Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of MYB-related transcription factor superfamily in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Int. J. Biol.Macromol. 2020; 164:2450-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.062spa
dc.relation.referencesR Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online at: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed April 2020).spa
dc.relation.references36. Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155: 945–959spa
dc.relation.referencesEvanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005;14: 2611–2620.doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005. 02553.xspa
dc.relation.referencesLipka A, Tian C, Wang Q, Peiffer J, Li M, et al. GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics. 2012; 18(15): 2397-2399.doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444spa
dc.relation.referencesYu J, Pressoir G, Briggs W, Vroh Bi I, Yamasaki M, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 2006; 38(2) :203-208. doi :10. 1038.ng1702spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C, Todhunter R, Tiwari H, et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2010; 42 :355-360. doi :10.1038/ng.546spa
dc.relation.referencesSegura V, Vilhjalmsson B, Platt A, Korte A, Seren U, et al. An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 2012; 44 :825-830. doi :10.1038/ng.2314spa
dc.relation.referencesEndelman J. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome. 2011; 4(3):250-255. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024spa
dc.relation.referencesSzalonek M, Sierpien B, Rymaszewski W, Gieczewska K, Garstka M, et al. Potato Annexin STANN1 promotes drought tolerance and mitigates light stress in transgenic Solanum tuberosum L. plants. PloS One. 2015; 10(7): e0132683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132683spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E, Theeuwen T, Oortwijn M, Visser R, Van der Linden G. Carbon partitioning mechanism in potato under stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020; 146:211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.019spa
dc.relation.referencesHirut B, Shimeli H, Fentahum M, Bonierbale M, Gastelo M, et al. Combining ability of highland tropic adapted potato for tuber and yield components under drought. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12: e0181541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181541spa
dc.relation.referencesJuyó D, Sarmiento F, Álvarez M, Brochero H, Gebhardt C, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure in diploid potatoes of Solanum tuberosum Group phureja. Crop Sci. 2015; 55: 760–769. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0524spa
dc.relation.referencesCamadro E. Relevance of the genetic structure of natural populations, and sampling and classification approaches conservation and use of wild crop relatives: potato as an example. Botany. 2012; 90: 1065-1072. doi:10.1139/b2012-090spa
dc.relation.referencesSpooner D, Gavrilenko T, Jansky S, Ovchinnikova A, Krylova E, et al. Ecogeography od ploidy variation in cultivated potato (Solanum sect. Petota). Am. J. Bot. 2010; 97: 2049-2060.doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000277spa
dc.relation.referencesContreras-Soto R, Mora F, Lazzari F, Oliveira M, Scapim C, et al. Genome-wide association mapping for flowering and maturity in tropical soybean: implications for breeding strategies. Breed. Sci. 2017; 67:435- 449. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.17024spa
dc.relation.referencesMora F; Castillo D; Lado B; Matus I, Poland J, et al. Genome-wide association mapping of agronomic traits and carbon isotope discrimination in a worldwide germplasm collection of spring wheat using SNP markers. Mol. Breed. 2015; 35: 69. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0264-yspa
dc.relation.referencesZhu R, Gao Y, Zhang Q. Quantitative trait locus mapping of floral and related traits using an F2 population of Aquilegia. Plant Breed. 2014; 133(1):153-161. doi:10.1111/pbr.12128spa
dc.relation.referencesSkeffington A, Graf A, Duxbury Z, Gruissem W, Smith A. Glucan, water dikinase exerts little control over starch degradation in Arabidopsis leaves at night. Plant Physiol. 2014; 165, 866-879. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.237016spa
dc.relation.referencesRudack K, Seddig S, Sprenger H, Kohl K, Uptmoor R, et al. Drought stress-induced changes in starch yield and physiological traits in potato. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2017; 203 (6):494-505. doi: 10.1111/jac.12224spa
dc.relation.referencesHwang J, Song W, Hong D, Ko D, Yamaoka Y, et al. Plant ABC transporter enable many unique aspects of a terrestrial plants lifestyle. Mol. Plant. 2016; 9:338-355. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.02.003spa
dc.relation.referencesParmar R, Seth R, Singh P, Singh G, Kumar S, et al. Transcriptional profiling of contrasting genotypes revealed key candidates and nucleotide variations for drought dissection in Camellia sinensis (L.) O. kuntze. Sci. Rep. 2019; 9: 7487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43925-wspa
dc.relation.referencesRomero A, Alarcón A, Valbuena R, Galeano C. Physiological assessment of water stress in potato using spectral information. Front.Plant Sci. 2017; 8,1608. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01608spa
dc.relation.referencesRamirez D, Yactayo W, Gutierrez R, Mares V. Chlorophyll concentration in leaves is an indicator of potato tuber yield in water-shortage conditions. Sci.Hortic. 2014;168: 202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.scientia.2014.01.036spa
dc.relation.referencesGao Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Liu L. Hexameric structure of the ATPase motor subunit of magnesium chelatase in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Protein Sci. 2019;29 (4): 1026-1032.doi: 10.1002/pro.3816spa
dc.relation.referencesJaved T, Shabbir R, Ali A, Afzal I, Zaheer U, et al. Transcription factors in plants stress responses: Challenges and potential for sugarcane improvement. Plants. 2020; 9: 491. doi: 10.3390/plants9040491spa
dc.relation.referencesYang X, Liu J, Xu J, Duan S, Wang Q, et al. Transcription profiling reveals effects of drought stress gene expression in diploid potato Genotype P3-198. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019; 20,852. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040852spa
dc.relation.referencesStein O. Granot D. 2019.An overview of sucrose synthase in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10,95. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00095spa
dc.relation.referencesKondrak M, Marincs F, Antal F, Juhasz Z, Banfalvi Z. Effects of yeast trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 on gene expression and carbohydrate contents of potato leaves under drought stress conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-74spa
dc.relation.referencesXu J, Wang X, Guo W. The cytochrome P450 superfamily: key players in plant development and defense. J. Integr. Agri. 2015; 14,1673-1686. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60980-1spa
dc.relation.referencesLi P, Li Y, Zhang F, Zhang G, Jiang X, et al. The Arabidopsis UDP-glycosyltransferase UGT79B2 and UGT79B3, contribute to cold, salt and drought stress tolerance via modulating anthocyanin accumulation. Plant J. 2016;89 (1):85.103. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13324spa
dc.relation.referencesMosquera T, Álvarez M, Jiménez J, Muktar M, Paulo M, et al. Gebhardt C. 2016. Targeted and Untargeted Approaches Unravel Novel Candidate Genes and Diagnostic SNPs for Quantitative Resistance of the Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to Phytophthora infestans Causing the Late Blight Disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6), e0156254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156254spa
dc.relation.referencesGuo M, Lu Z, Zhai Y, Chai W, Gong Z, et al. Genome-wide analysis, expression profile of heat shock factor gene family (CaHsfs) and characterization of CaHsfA2 in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15:151. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0512-7spa
dc.relation.referencesSprenger H, Kurowsky C, Horn R, Erban A, Seddig S, et al. The drought response of potato reference cultivars with contrasting tolerance. Plant, Cell and Envir. 2016;39 (11): 2370-2389.doi: 10.1111/pce.12780spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu J, Pang X, Cheng Y, Yin Y, Zhang Q, et al. The Hsp70 gene family in Solanum tuberosum: Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expressions patterns. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8:11628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34878-7spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao P, Wang D, Wang R, Kong N, Zhang C, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the potato Hsp20 gene family: identification, genomic organization and expression profiles in response to heat stress. BMC Genomics. 2018;19 (61). doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4443-1spa
dc.relation.referencesYamada K, Osakabe Y, Mizoi J. Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis thaliana abiotic stress-inducible facilitated diffusion transporter for monosaccharides. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285, 1138–1146. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.054288spa
dc.relation.referencesPoschet G, Hannisch B, Raab S, Jungkunz I, Klemens P, et al. A novel Arabidopsis vacuolar glucose exporter is involved in cellular sugar homeostasis and affects the composition of seed storage compounds. Plant Physiol. 2011; 157 (4):1664-1676. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.186825spa
dc.relation.referencesIslam M, Choudhury M, Majlishb A, Islamc T, Ghosh A. Comprehensive genome-wide analysis of glutathione S-transferase gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and their expression profiling in various anatomical tissues and perturbation conditions. Gene. 2018; 639: 149-162. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.10.007spa
dc.relation.referencesDong T, Xu X, Park Y, Kim D, Lee Y, et al. Abscisic acid uridine diphosphate glucosyltransferases play a crucial role in abscisic acid homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physi. 2014; 165:227–89. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.239210spa
dc.relation.referencesMhashe D, Mahatma K, Jha S, Singh P, Mahatma L, et al. Castor (Ricinus communis L.) Rc-LOX plays important role in wilt resistance. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013; 45: 20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.035spa
dc.relation.referencesHyun T, Van der Graaff E, Albacete A, Eom S, Grobkinsky D, et al. The Arabidopsis PLAT domain protein 1 is a critically involved in abiotic stress tolerance. PloS One. 2014; 9, e112946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112946spa
dc.relation.referencesLi J, Han G, Sun C, Suin N. Research advances of MYB transcription factors in plant stress resistance and breeding. Plant Signal Behav. 2019;14(8):1613131. doi:10.1080/15592324spa
dc.relation.referencesChen Y, Li C, Yi J, Yang Y, Lei C, et al. Transcriptome response to drought, rehydration and re-dehydration in potato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020; 21 (1):159. doi :10.3390/ijms21010159spa
dc.relation.referencesShin D, Moon S, Kim B, Park S, Lee S, et al. Expressions of StMYB1R-1, a novel potato single MYB-like domain transcription factor, increases drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2011; 155(1):421-432. doi: 10.1104/pp110.163634spa
dc.relation.referencesAbid M, Ali S, Qi L, Zahoor R, Tian Z, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 4615. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21441-7spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmadi S, Andersen N, Plauborg F, Poulsen R. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field-grown potatoes : gas exchange and xylem ABA. Agr. Water Manage. 2010; 97: 1486-1494. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E, Theeuwen T, Oortwijn M, Visser R, Van der Linden G. Carbon partitioning mechanisms in potato under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 211-219, doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.019spa
dc.relation.referencesAliche E, Oortwijn M, Theeuwen T, et al. Genetic mapping of tuber size distribution and marketable tuber yield under drought stress in potatoes. Euphytica. 2019; 215: 186. doi: 10.1007/s10681-019-2508-0spa
dc.relation.referencesAnithakumari A, Nataraja K, Visser R, van der Linden C. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance and recovery potential by quantitative trait locus mapping of a diploid potato population. Mol. Breed. 2011; 30 (3):1.17. doi:10.1007/s11032-012-9728-5spa
dc.relation.referencesAriza W, Rodríguez L, Moreno D, Guerrero C, Moreno L. Effect of water deficit on some physiological and biochemical responses the yellow diploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L. group Phureja). Agron. Colomb. 2020; 38 (1): 36-44. doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v38n1.78982spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, N. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008; 59:89-113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759spa
dc.relation.referencesBanik P, Zeng W, Tai H, Bizimungu B, Tanino K. Effects of drought acclimation on drought stress resistance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016; 126:76-89. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.01.008spa
dc.relation.referencesBarnaby J, Fleisher D, Singh S, Sicher R, Reddy V. Combined effect and CO2 enrichment on foliar metabolites of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars. J. Plant Interact. 2019; 14(1):110-118. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2018.1562110spa
dc.relation.referencesBasu S, Ramegowda V, Kumar A, Pereira A. Plant adaptation to stress. F1000Res. 2016; 5: F1000 Faculty Rev-1554. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7678.1spa
dc.relation.referencesBoguszewska-Mankowska D, Pieczynski M, Wyrzykowska A, Kalaji H, Sieczko L, et al. Divergent strategies displayed by potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars to cope with soil drought. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2018; 204(1):13-30. doi:10.1111/jac.12245spa
dc.relation.referencesBoguszewska-Mankowska D, Zarzyńska K, Nosalewicz, A. Drought differentially affects root system size and architecture of potato cultivars with differing drought tolerance. Am.J. Potato Res. 2020; 97(1): 54– 62. doi: 10.1007/s12230-019-09755-2spa
dc.relation.referencesBunding C, Vu T, Sedding S, Schum A, Winkelmann. Variability in osmotic stress tolerance of starch potato genotypes (Solanum tuberosum L.) as revealed by an In Vitro screening: Role of proline, osmotic adjustment and drought response in pot trial. J. Agro. Crop Sci. 2017; 203(3):206-218. doi:10.1111/jac.12186spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz P, Melgarejo L, Arcila I, Mosquera T. Physiological, biochemical and yield-component responses of Solanum tuberosum L. Group Phureja genotypes to a water deficit. 2021. Plants; 10(4):634. doi: 10.3390/plants10040638spa
dc.relation.referencesDien D, Mochizuki T, Yamakawa T. Effects of various drought stresses and subsequent recovery on proline, total soluble sugar and starch metabolism in rice (Oriza sativa L.) varieties. Plant Prod. Sci. 2019; 22(4):530-545. doi: 10.1080/1343943X.2019.1647787spa
dc.relation.referencesDu Y, Zhao Q, Chen L, Yao X, Zhang W, et al. Effect of drought stress on sugar metabolism in leaves and root of soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020; 146:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte D, Narváez C, Restrepo L, Kushalappa A, Mosquera T. Development and validation of liquid chromatographic method to quantify sucrose, glucose and fructose of Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja. J. Chromatogr. B. 2015, 975,18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.10.039spa
dc.relation.referencesFarhad M, Babak A, Reza Z, Hassan R, Afshin. Response of proline, soluble sugars, photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant enzymes in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to different irrigation regimes in greenhouse condition. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011; 5(1):55-60. doi:10.3316/informit.834571763803137spa
dc.relation.referencesGervais T, Creelman A, Li X, Benoit B, De Koeyer D, Dahal K. Potato response to drought stress: physiological and growth basis. Front. Plant. Sci. 2021; 12:1630. Doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.698060spa
dc.relation.referencesGray S, Brady S. Plant developmental responses to climate change. Dev. Biol. 2016; 419: 64-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.07.023spa
dc.relation.referencesHijmans J. The effect of climate change on global potato production. Am. J. Potato Res. 2003 ;80:271:279. doi: 10.1007/BF02855363spa
dc.relation.referencesHirut B, Shimelis H, Fentahun M, Bonierbale M, Gastelo M, et al. Combining ability of highland tropic adapted potato for tuber yield and yield components under drought. Plos One. 2017;12(7):e0181541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181541spa
dc.relation.referencesHoelle J, Asch F, Khan A; Bonierdale M. Phenology-adjusted stress severity index to assess genotypic responses to terminal drought in field grown potato. Agronomy. 2020;10(9):1298. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10031298spa
dc.relation.referencesKondrák M, Marincs F, Antal F, Jahász Z, Bánfalvi Z. Effects of yeast trethalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 on gene expression and carbohydrate contents of potato leaves under drought stress conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:74. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-74spa
dc.relation.referencesHu L, Xie Y, Fan S, Wang Z, Zhang B. Comparative analysis of root transcriptome profiles between drought-tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to water stress. Plant Sci. 2018; 272:276-293. doi: 10.10167j,plantsci.2018.03.036spa
dc.relation.referencesIbañez V, Kozub C, González C, Jerez D, Masueeli R, et al. Response to water deficit of semi-desert wild potato Solanum Kurtzianum genotypes collected from different altitudes. Plant Sci. 2021; 308:110911. doi:10.10.16/j.plantsci.2021.110911spa
dc.relation.referencesIPCC. Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2021; Cambridge University Press. In Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesKim W, Lizumi T, Nishimori M. Global patterns of crop production losses associated with drought from 1983 to 2009. JAMC. 2019; 58(6): 1233-1244. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0174.1spa
dc.relation.referencesLegay S, Lefevre L, Lamourex D, Barreta C, Gutierrez R. Carbohydrate metabolism and cell protection mechanisms differentiate drought tolerant and sensitive in advanced potato clones (Solanum tuberosum L.). Funct. Integr. Genomics. 2011; 11:275-291. doi: 10.1007/s1042-010-0206-zspa
dc.relation.referencesLeng G, Hall. Crop yield sensitivity of global major agricultural countries to drought and the projected changes in the future. Sci. Total Environ. 2019; 654: 811-821. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv2018.10434spa
dc.relation.referencesLi X, Ramírez D, Qin J, Dormatey R, Bi Z, et al. Water restriction scenarios and their effects on traits in potato with different degrees of drought tolerance. Sci. Hort. 2019; 256: 108525. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.052spa
dc.relation.referencesMarcek T, Áron K, Végh B, Janda T, Darko E. Metabolic response to drought in six winter wheat genotypes. Plos One. 2019;14(2): e0212411 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212411spa
dc.relation.referencesMartorell S, Díaz-Espejo A, Medrano H, Ball M, Choat B. Rapidly hydraulic recovery in Eucalyptus pauciflora ater drought: linkages between stem hydraulic and leaf exchange. Plant Cell Environ. 2014; 37:617-626. doi: 10.1111/pce.12182spa
dc.relation.referencesOsakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozahi K, Tran L. Response of plants to water stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 86. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00086spa
dc.relation.referencesPlich J, Boguszewska-Mankowska D, Marczewki W. Relations between photosynthetic parameters and drought-induced tuber yield decrease in Katahdin- derived potato cultivars. Potato Res. 2020; 63:463-470. doi: 10.1007/s11540-020-09451-3spa
dc.relation.referencesQin J, Bian C, Liu J, Zhang J, Jin L. An efficient greenhouse use method to screen potato genotypes for drought tolerance. Sci. Hort. 2019; 253: 61-69. doi:10.1016/j.scientia.2019.04.017spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez D, Yactayo W, Gutiérrez R, Mares V, De Mendiburu F, et al. Chlorophyll concentration in leaves is an indicator of potato tuber yield in water-shortage conditions. Sci. Hort. 2014; 168:202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.scientia.2014.01.036spa
dc.relation.referencesRaymundo E, Asseng S, Robertson R, Petsakos A, Hoogenboom G, et al. Climate change on global potato production . Eur. J. Agron. 2018. 100: 87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.11008spa
dc.relation.referencesR Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2021, R Foundation Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed May 2021).spa
dc.relation.referencesRodrigues J, Inzé D, Nelissen H, Saibo N. Source-sink regulation in crops under water deficit. Trend Plant Sci. 2019; 24(7):652-663. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.04.005spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez L, Ñústez C, Moreno L. Drought stress affects physiological parameters but not tuber yield in stress Andean potato (Solanum tubesorum L.) cultivars. Agron. Colomb. 2017; 35(2):158-170. doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v35n2.65901spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez L, Sanjuanelo D, Ñústez C, Moreno-Fonseca L. Growth and phenology of three Andean potato varieties (Solanum tuberosum L.) under water stress. Agron. Colom. 2016;34(2). doi: 10.15446/agron.colom.v34n2.55279spa
dc.relation.referencesRolando J, Ramírez D, Yactayo W, Monneveux P, Quiroz R. Leaf greenness as a drought tolerance related trait in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Environ. Exp. Bot.2015; 110:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero A, Alarcón A, Valbuena R, Galeano C. Physiological assessment of water stress in potato using spectral information. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1608. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01608spa
dc.relation.referencesRudack K, S eddig S, Sprenger H, Kohl K, Uptomoor R, et al. Drought stress-induced changes in starch yield and physiological traits in potato. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2017; 1-12. doi:10.1111/jac.12224spa
dc.relation.referencesSaravia D, Farfán E, Gutiérrez R, De Mendiburu F, Schafleitner R. Yield and physiological response of potatoes indicate different strategies to cope with drought stress and nitrogen fertilization. Am. J. Potato Res. 2016; 93:288-296. doi: 10.1007/s12230-016-9505-9spa
dc.relation.referencesShi S, Fan M, Iwaka K, Li F, Jia L. Physiological basis of drought tolerance in potato grown under long-term water deficit. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2015; 9(2): 305-320.spa
dc.relation.referencesSoltys-Kalina D, Plich J, Strzelczyk-Zyta S, Sliwka J, Marczewski W. The effect of drought stress on the leaf relative water content and tuber yield of a half-sib family of “Katahdin”derived potato cultivars. Breed. Sci. 2016; 66:328:331. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.66.328spa
dc.relation.referencesSprenger H, Rudack K, Schudoma C, Neumann A, Seddig, S, et al. Assessment of drought tolerance and its potential yield in potato. Funct. Plant Biol. 2015; 42: 655-667.doi: 10.1071/FP15013spa
dc.relation.referencesUrban L, Aarrouf J, Bidel L. Assessing the effects of water deficit on photosynthesis using parameters derived from measurements of leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence. Front. Plan Sci. 2017;8:2068. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.02068spa
dc.relation.referencesWang Z, Wei P, Wu M, Xu Y, Li F, et al. Analysis of the sucrose synthase gene family in tobacco: structure, phylogeny and expression patterns. Planta.2015; 242(1):153-166. doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2297-1spa
dc.relation.referencesXia H, Ma X, Xu K, et al. Temporal trancriptomic differences between tolerant and susceptible genotypes contribute to rice drought tolerance. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:776. doi:10.1186/s12864-020-07193-7spa
dc.relation.referencesYang X, Lu M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, et al. Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae. 2021; 7:50. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7030050spa
dc.relation.referencesZarzyńska K, Boguszewska-Mańkowska D, Nosalewicz, A. Differences in size and architecture of potato cultivars and their tolerance to drought stress. Plant, Soil Envinron. 2017; 63(4): 159– 164. doi:10.17221/4/2017-PSEspa
dc.relation.referencesZhang S, Xu X, Sun Y, Zhang J, Li C. Influence of drought hardening on the resistance physiology of potato seedlings under drought stress. J. Integr. Agric. 2018; 17(2):336-347. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61758-1spa
dc.relation.referencesZulfiqar F, Akram , Ashraf . Osmoprotection in plants under abiotic stresses: new insight into a classical phenomenon. Planta. 2020:251:3. doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03293-1spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc630 - Agricultura y tecnologías relacionadas::635 - Cultivos hortícolas (Horticultura)spa
dc.subject.lembALMIDON DE PAPA-ANALISISspa
dc.subject.lembPotato starch - analysiseng
dc.subject.proposalToleranceeng
dc.subject.proposalToleranciaspa
dc.subject.proposalwater deficiteng
dc.subject.proposaldeficit hidricospa
dc.subject.proposalassociation mappingeng
dc.subject.proposalmapeo por asociacionspa
dc.subject.proposalearly signaleng
dc.subject.proposalsenales tempranasspa
dc.titleNatural allelic diversity and signal responses associated with water deficit tolerance in Solanum tuberosum Group Phurejaeng
dc.title.translatedDiversidad alelica natual y senales respuestas asociadas con la tolerancia al deficit hidrico en Solanum tuberosum Grupo Phurejaspa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadoresspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.fundernameColcienciasspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis_PADV.pdf
Tamaño:
3.74 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: