Modelo de madurez para la evaluación de la logística 4.0 en operaciones logísticas de ecommerce

dc.contributor.advisorOsorio Ramírez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRivillas Mejia, Cristian David
dc.contributor.researchgroupSociedad, Economia y Productividad -spa
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-06T17:53:09Z
dc.date.available2022-10-06T17:53:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-26
dc.descriptiongráficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractLa logística 4.0 es la adopción de tecnologías digitales en los diferentes procesos que abarca la cadena de suministro. En la actualidad diferentes organizaciones esperan un impacto de estas tecnologías en sus operaciones y modelos de negocio, sin embargo, entender el concepto Industria 4.0 se complejiza y más aún en los procesos de selección de tecnologías, evaluación, implementación y mejora que se viene a buscar con estos; por ende, este trabajo plantea la unión de la logística 4.0 con el sector ecommerce debido a sus necesidades particulares, crecimiento exponencial y prioridad estratégica de las empresas. Al combinar las tecnologías 4.0 y la logística de ecommerce, se busca asumir una serie de desafíos en el crecimiento sostenible y eficiente de los canales digitales, el poder evaluar esto es un reto latente en el sector ecommerce, por consiguiente, se propone un Modelo de Madurez en logística 4.0 para operaciones logísticas de ecommerce, que busca evaluar el nivel de madurez de las organizaciones. Se construye un modelo de madurez con el procedimiento propuesto por Becker y los principios de diseño de Hevner, el modelo consta de nueve subdimensiones y cinco niveles de madurez. El modelo se valida en una organización de ecommerce, arrojando una serie de resultados que permite identificar sus debilidades y fortalezas entorno a la logística 4.0. El modelo demuestra que la logística 4.0 puede ser evaluada en las operaciones logísticas de ecommerce y esta validado en un entorno de la vida real, a la vez que puede ser extendido a otras organizaciones. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractLogistics 4.0 is the assumption of digital technologies in the supply chain's different processes. At present, distinct organizations expect an impact of these technologies in their operations and business models; however, understanding the Industry 4.0 concept has become more complex, even more so in the processes of technology selection, evaluation, implementation, and improvement are sought with these. This work proposes the union of logistics 4.0 with the e-commerce sector due to its needs, exponential growth, and priority strategies of companies. By combining 4.0 technologies and e-commerce logistics, it seeks to assume a series of challenges in the sustainable and efficient growing of digital channels to be able to evaluate this is a latent challenge in the sector; therefore, a Maturity Model proposes in logistics 4.0 for logistics operations of electronic commerce, which seeks to assess the level of maturity of organizations in it. A Maturity Model is built with the method proposed by Becker and Hevner's design principles, the model consists of nine subdimensions and five maturity levels. The model is validated in an e-commerce organization, yielding results that allow identifying its weaknesses and strengths around logistics 4.0. The model demonstrates that logistics 4.0 can be evaluated in e-commerce operations and is validated in a real-life environment while being extended to other organizations.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrialspa
dc.description.researchareaLogística y Cadena de Suministrospa
dc.format.extentxxi, 149 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/82355
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríaspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería Industrialspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdirad, M., & Krishnan, K. (2020). Industry 4.0 in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1783935spa
dc.relation.referencesAgca, O., Gibson, J., Godsell, J., Ignatius, J., Wyn Davies, C., & Xu, O. (2017). An Industry 4 readiness assessment tool. International Institute for Product and Service Innovation, 1–19. www.warwick.ac.uk/scip1spa
dc.relation.referencesAkram, H., & Khan, A. U. (2020). E-commerce trends during COVID-19 Pandemic E-commerce trends during COVID-19 Pandemic. June, 0–4.spa
dc.relation.referencesArmengaud, E., Sams, C., von Falck, G., List, G., Kreiner, C., & Riel, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 as digitalization over the entire product lifecycle: Opportunities in the automotive domain. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 748(September), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_28spa
dc.relation.referencesBarreto, L., Amaral, A., & Pereira, T. (2017). Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.045spa
dc.relation.referencesBasl, J., & Doucek, P. (2019). A metamodel for evaluating enterprise readiness in the context of industry 4.0. Information (Switzerland), 10(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10030089spa
dc.relation.referencesBecker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5spa
dc.relation.referencesBecker, L. (2015). Effectiveness of Public Innovation Support in Europe. Does Public Support Foster Turnover, Employment and Labour Productivity? SSRN Electronic Journal, 236. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2585442spa
dc.relation.referencesBitkom, V. (n.d.). Vorschlag zur systematischen Klassifikation von Interaktionen in Industrie 4.0 Systemen Hinführung.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlackSip. (2022). Reporte de industria: El ecommerce en Colombia 2021-2022. Pei, 1–spa
dc.relation.referencesBogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Part I Theoretical Concepts : Interviewing Experts, January 2009, 1–16.spa
dc.relation.referencesBogner, E., Voelklein, T., Schroedel, O., & Franke, J. (2016). Study Based Analysis on the Current Digitalization Degree in the Manufacturing Industry in Germany. Procedia CIRP, 57, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.004spa
dc.relation.referencesCandelon, F., Yang, F., & Wu, D. (2019). Are China’s Digital Companies Ready to Go Global? https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/china-digital-companies-ready-go-globalspa
dc.relation.referencesČengija, S., & Kapitan, K. L. (2008). CMMI - Capability Maturity Model Integration. MIPRO 2008 - 31st International Convention Proceedings: Digital Economy - 5th ALADIN, Information Systems Security, Business Intelligence Systems, Local Government and Student Papers, 5, 229–234.spa
dc.relation.referencesChevalier, S. (2022). Global retail e-commerce sales 2014-2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/spa
dc.relation.referencesCimini, C., Lagorio, A., Pirola, F., & Pinto, R. (2019). Exploring human factors in Logistics 4.0: Empirical evidence from a case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 2183–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.529spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). Research Desing: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (SAGE (ed.); 4th ed.).spa
dc.relation.referencesde Bruin, T., Rosemann, M., Freeze, R., & Kulkarni, U. (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. ACIS 2005 Proceedings - 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, January.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E., & Terzi, S. (2017). A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 513, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_2spa
dc.relation.referencesDennis, M., Ramaswamy, C., M Noorul, A., Jayaram, V., & Capgemini. (2017). Asset Performance Management Maturity Model. 12.spa
dc.relation.referencesDHL. (2020). The Logistics Trend Radar 5th Edition. 1–84.spa
dc.relation.referencesDHLTrend Research. (2020). TREND RADAR 5 th Edition LOGISTICS THE Delivering insight today, creating value tomorrow.spa
dc.relation.referencesDikhanbayeva, D., Shaikholla, S., Suleiman, Z., & Turkyilmaz, A. (2020). Assessment of industry 4.0 maturity models by design principles. Sustainability (Switzerland),12(23), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239927spa
dc.relation.referencesDubovitskaya, A., Novotny, P., Xu, Z., & Wang, F. (2020). Applications of Blockchain Technology for Data-Sharing in Oncology: Results from a Systematic Literature Review. Oncology (Switzerland), 98(6), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504325spa
dc.relation.referencesFacchini, F., Olésków-Szłapka, J., Ranieri, L., & Urbinati, A. (2019). A maturity model for logistics 4.0: An empirical analysis and a roadmap for future research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010086spa
dc.relation.referencesFacchini, F., Olésków-Szłapka, J., Ranieri, L., & Urbinati, A. (2020). A maturity model for logistics 4.0: An empirical analysis and a roadmap for future research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010086spa
dc.relation.referencesFatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2021). Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning and Control, 32(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1712487spa
dc.relation.referencesFerreira, G. (2017). A oportunidade da Indústria 4.0 para o Brasil.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrazzon, E. M., Rodriguez, C. M. T., Pereira, M. M., Pires, M. C., & Uhlmann, I. (2019). Towards Supply Chain Management 4.0. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2019.v16.n2.a2spa
dc.relation.referencesFrehe, V., Stiel, F., & Teuteberg, F. (2014). A maturity model and web application for environmental management benchmarking. 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2014, August.spa
dc.relation.referencesGanzarain, J., & Nekane, E. (2008). Three Stage Maturity Model in SME’s towards Industry 4.0. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 133(50), 2601.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Mireles, G. A., Moraga, M. Á., & García, F. (2012). Development of maturity models: A systematic literature review. IET Seminar Digest, 2012(1), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1049/ic.2012.0036spa
dc.relation.referencesGhobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057spa
dc.relation.referencesGlistau, E., & Coello Machado, N. I. (2019). Logistics 4.0 - Basics, Ideas and Useful Methods. July, 0–7. https://doi.org/10.26649/musci.2019.022spa
dc.relation.referencesGökalp, E., Şener, U., & Eren, P. E. (2017). Development of an assessment model for industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 770, 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10spa
dc.relation.referencesGökalp, Şener, Eren, & Informatics. (2017). Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM Ebru. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 54, 117–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.03.004spa
dc.relation.referencesHasanat, M., & Ashikul, H. (2020). The Impact of Coronavirus (Covid-19) on E-Business in Malaysia. 3(June), 85–90.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeidling, E., Meil, P., Neumer, J., Porschen-Hueck, S., Schmierl, K., Sopp, P., & Wagner, A. (2019a). IMPULS.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeidling, E., Meil, P., Neumer, J., Porschen-Hueck, S., Schmierl, K., Sopp, P., & Wagner, A. (2019b). IMPULS. In IMPULS-Stiftung.spa
dc.relation.referencesHelo, P., & Szekely, B. (2005). Logistics information systems: An analysis of software solutions for supply chain co-ordination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510575153spa
dc.relation.referencesHevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Research 1. Design Science in IS Research MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75.spa
dc.relation.referencesHofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, G. Q., de Koster, R., & Yu, Y. (2020). Editorial: Online-to-offline ecommerce operations management (EOM). Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101920spa
dc.relation.referencesKaabi, S., & Jallouli, R. (2019). Overview of E-commerce Technologies, Data Analysis Capabilities and Marketing Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 358, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30874-2_14spa
dc.relation.referencesKawa, A. (2017). FULFILLMENT SERVICE IN E-COMMERCE LOGISTICS. 13(4), 429–438.spa
dc.relation.referencesKayikci, Y. (2019). E-Commerce in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. June 2017. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7362-3.ch076spa
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009spa
dc.relation.referencesKlötzer, C., & Pflaum, A. (2017). Toward the development of a MM digitalization suppl.pdf. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4210–4219. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41669spa
dc.relation.referencesKluth, A., Jäger, J., Schatz, A., & Bauernhansl, T. (2014). Method for a systematic evaluation of advanced complexity management maturity. Procedia CIRP, 19(C), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.041spa
dc.relation.referencesKohlegger, M., Maier, R., & Thalmann, S. (2009). Understanding_Maturity_Models.Pdf. I-KNOW ’09 and I-SEMANTICS ’09, 2-4 September 2006, Graz, Austria, September, 51–61.spa
dc.relation.referencesKostrzewski, M., Kosacka-Olejnik, M., & Werner-Lewandowska, K. (2019). Assessment of innovativeness level for chosen solutions related to Logistics 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 38(2019), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.080spa
dc.relation.referencesLaber, J., Thamma, R., & Kirby, E. D. (2020). The Impact of Warehouse Automation in Amazon’s Success. IJISET-International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 7(8), 63–70. www.ijiset.comspa
dc.relation.referencesLanders, T. L., Cole, M. H., Walker, B., & Kirk, R. W. (2000). The virtual warehousing concept. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 36(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(99)00024-1spa
dc.relation.referencesLeyh, C., Bley, K., Schaffer, T., & Forstenhausler, S. (2016). SIMMI 4.0-a maturity model for classifying the enterprise-wide it and software landscape focusing on Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2016, 8, 1297–1302. https://doi.org/10.15439/2016F478spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, W., Zhong, Y., Wang, X., & Cao, Y. (2013). Resource virtualization and service selection in cloud logistics. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(6), 1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2013.02.019spa
dc.relation.referencesMangiaracina, R., Marchet, G., Perotti, S., Tumino, A., Mangiaracina, R., Marchet, G., Perotti, S., & Tumino, A. (2015). Mangiaracina2015.Pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesMenon, K., Kärkkäinen, H., & Lasrado, L. A. (2016). Towards a maturity modeling approach for the implementation of industrial internet. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016 - Proceedings, June.spa
dc.relation.referencesMettler, T. (2011). Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 3(1/2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsss.2011.038934spa
dc.relation.referencesMettler, T., & Rohner, P. (2009). Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, DESRIST ’09. https://doi.org/10.1145/1555619.1555649spa
dc.relation.referencesMittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018). A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 49(June), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005spa
dc.relation.referencesMittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2019). Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233(5), 1342–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405417736547spa
dc.relation.referencesMollenkopf, D. A., Ozanne, L. K., & Stolze, H. J. (2020). A transformative supply chain response to COVID-19. Journal of Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0143spa
dc.relation.referencesMüller, J. M., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Supply Chains in Engineer-to-Order Industries - An Exploratory Case Study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.245spa
dc.relation.referencesNobrega, J. H. C., Rampasso, I. S., Sanchez-Rodrigues, V., Quelhas, O. L. G., Leal Filho, W., Serafim, M. P., & Anholon, R. (2021). Logistics 4.0 in brazil: Critical analysis and relationships with sdg 9 targets. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313012spa
dc.relation.referencesOla, J., Logan, S., Vallandingham, R., Fragapane, G., Wessel, J., Aili, S., Hætta, B., & Nakul, S. (2017). Logistics 4 . 0 and emerging sustainable business models. Advances in Manufacturing, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0198-1spa
dc.relation.referencesOleśków-Szłapka, J., Pawlak, N., & Stachowiak, A. (2020). Logistics 4.0 in Selected Logistics Companies in Poland-Preliminary Review. Digitalization of Supply Chains, April, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.17270/b.m.978-83-66017-86-3.2spa
dc.relation.referencesOleśków-Szłapka, J., & Stachowiak, A. (2019). The framework of logistics 4.0 maturity model. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 835, 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97490-3_73spa
dc.relation.referencesOlessków-Szłapka, J., Wojciechowski, H., Domański, R., & Pawłowski, G. (2019). Logistics 4.0 maturity levels assessed based on GDM (grey decision model) and artificial intelligence in logistics 4.0 -trends and future perspective. Procedia Manufacturing, 39(2019), 1734–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.266spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, E. (2021). INDUSTRY 4 . 0 IMPACTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF RETAIL E-COMMERCE . IX(Ix), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.31364/SCIRJ/v9.i09.2021.P0921876spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2010). Information technology adoption models at Firm Level: Review of literature. 4th European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, ECIME 2010, January 2011, 312–322.spa
dc.relation.referencesPedrosa, I., Suárez Álvarez, J., & García Cueto, E. (2013). Content validity evidences: Theoretical advances and estimation methods. Acción Psicológica, 10(2), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11820spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Mergarejo, E., Pérez-Vergara, I., & Rodríguez-Ruíz, Y. (2014). Modelos de madurez y su idoneidad para aplicar en pequeñas y medianas empresas. Maturity Models and the Suitability of Its Application in Small and Medium Enterprises., 35(2), 146–158. http://ezproxy.uniandes.edu.co:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=fua&AN=108922111&lang=es&site=eds-live&scope=sitespa
dc.relation.referencesPessl, E., Sorko, S. R., & Mayer, B. (2017). Roadmap industry 4.0 - Implementation guideline for enterprises. 26th International Association for Management of Technology Conference, IAMOT 2017, 5(6), 1728–1743. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14spa
dc.relation.referencesPöppelbuß, J., & Röglinger, M. (2011). What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011, June.spa
dc.relation.referencesPujawan, I. N., & Bah, A. U. (2022). Supply chains under COVID-19 disruptions: literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Forum, 23(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1932568spa
dc.relation.referencesPWC. (2012). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. 15(11), 1136–1138.spa
dc.relation.referencesQu, T., Pan, Y., Liu, X., Kang, K., Li, C., Thurer, M., & Huang, G. Q. (2017). Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics synchronization mechanism and method toward customer order dynamics. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 39(4), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331217691218spa
dc.relation.referencesRafael Hernandez-Nieto. (2002). Contributions to Statistical Analysis (C. I. P. Platform (ed.)).spa
dc.relation.referencesRockwell Automation. (2014). The Connected Enterprise Maturity Model. Industria Conectada 4.0, 1–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaaty. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaaty. (2004). DECISION MAKING – THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY AND NETWORK PROCESSES (AHP/ANP) Thomas. 13, 396–402.spa
dc.relation.referencesSalviano, C., Zoucas, A., Silva, J., Alves, M. A., Wangenheim, C., & Thiry, M. (2009). A Method Framework for Engineering Process Capability Models. Software Process, 36(September), 2–4. http://softwarepublico.gov.br/file/16910491/Salviano2009EuroSPIartEngMFMOD.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSarkis, J., Cohen, M. J., Dewick, P., & Schröder, P. (2020). A brave new world: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for transitioning to sustainable supply and production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 159, 104894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104894spa
dc.relation.referencesSaucedo-Martínez, J. A., Pérez-Lara, M., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. A., Salais-Fierro, T. E., & Vasant, P. (2018). Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(3), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0533-1spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidtke, N., Behrendt, F., Thater, L., & Meixner, S. (2018). Technical potentials and challenges within internal logistics 4.0. Proceedings - GOL 2018: 4th IEEE International Conference on Logistics Operations Management, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/GOL.2018.8378072spa
dc.relation.referencesSchuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., Ten Hompel, M., & Wahlster, W. (2018). acatech STUDY Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchuh, G. G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J. J., ten Hompel, M. M., Wahlster, W. (Eds. ., Ander, Lr., Gausemeier, J. J., ten Hompel, M. M., & Wahlster, W. (Eds. . (2020). Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index. Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies. Web, 1(5765), 46. www.acatech.de/publikationen.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumacher, A. (2015). Thesis Development of a maturity model for assessing the industry 4.0 maturity of industrial enterprises (Vol. 0826694, Issue September 2015). https://repositum.tuwien.at/handle/20.500.12708/7072spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumacher, Andreas, Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumacher, Andreas, Nemeth, T., & Sihn, W. (2019). Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 79, 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110spa
dc.relation.referencesShopify. (2022). The Future of Commerce Trend Report 2022.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimakov, V. (2020). History of Formation of E-Commerce Enterprises As Subjects of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Three Seas Economic Journal, 1(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-1-12spa
dc.relation.referencesSimetinger, F., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Deriving secondary traits of industry 4.0: A comparative analysis of significant maturity models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(4), 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2708spa
dc.relation.referencesSingapore Economic Development Board. (2018). The Singapore Smart Industry Readiness Index: Catalyzing the transoformation of manufacturing. 1–46. https://www.edb.gov.sg/content/dam/edbsite/news-and-resources/news/advanced-manufacturing-release/the-sg-smart-industry-readiness-index-whitepaper.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesStachowiak, A., Oleśków-Szłapka, J., & Cyplik, P. (2019). Triple Helix Model: The Role of Cooperation between Academy, Economy and Public Sector for Increasing Readiness for Logistics 4.0. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, May, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383902.3383906spa
dc.relation.referencesSzymańska, O., Adamczak, M., & Cyplik, P. (2017). Logistics 4.0 - a new paradigm or set of known solutions? Research in Logistics and Production, 7(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.21008/j.2083-4950.2017.7.4.2spa
dc.relation.referencesTiwari, R., & Buse, S. (2007). Barriers to Innovation in SMEs: Can the Internationalization of R&D Mitigate Their Effects? Proceedings of the First European Conference on Knowledge for Growth: Role and Dynamics of Corporate R&D, Seville, Spain, 49(0), 1–31. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1583446spa
dc.relation.referencesTsagkias, M., King, T. H., Kallumadi, S., Murdock, V., & de Rijke, M. (2020). Challenges and research opportunities in eCommerce search and recommendations. ACM SIGIR Forum, 54(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451964.3451966spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Steenbergen, M., Bos, R., Brinkkemper, S., Van De Weerd, I., & Bekkers, W. (2010). The design of focus area maturity models. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 662, 17–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesViu-roig, M., & Alvarez-palau, E. J. (2020). The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities : A Systematic Literature Review.spa
dc.relation.referencesVon Wangenheim, C. G. V., Hauck, J. C. R., Salviano, C. F., & Von Wangenheim, A. (2010). Systematic literature review of software process capability/maturity models. 10th International SPICE Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, SPICE 2010, April.spa
dc.relation.referencesWagire, A. A., Joshi, R., Rathore, A. P. S., & Jain, R. (2020). Development of maturity model for assessing the implementation of Industry 4.0: learning from theory and practice. Production Planning and Control, 32(8), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1744763spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, K. (2016). New Challenges and Opportunities. Iwama, 68–74.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeber, C., Königsberger, J., Kassner, L., & Mitschang, B. (2017). M2DDM - A Maturity Model for Data-Driven Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 63, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.309spa
dc.relation.referencesWerner-Lewandowska, K., & Kosacka-Olejnik, M. (2019a). Logistics 4.0 maturity in service industry: Empirical research results. Procedia Manufacturing, 38(2019), 1058–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.192spa
dc.relation.referencesWerner-Lewandowska, K., & Kosacka-Olejnik, M. (2019b). Logistics 4.0 maturity in service industry: Empirical research results. Procedia Manufacturing, 38(2019), 1058–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.192spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkelhaus, S., & Grosse, E. H. (2020). Logistics 4.0: a systematic review towards a new logistics system. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 18–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1612964spa
dc.relation.referencesWitkowski, K., Koralewska, M., & Huk, K. (2020). LOGISTICS MODELS IN E-COMMERCE. 28(46), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2020-0012spa
dc.relation.referencesXu, J. (2014). Managing digital enterprise: Ten essential topics. In Managing Digital Enterprise: Ten Essential Topics. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-094-2spa
dc.relation.referencesXu, J., & Gao, X. (2019). Overview and Foundation of E-Business. 2020.spa
dc.relation.referencesYagiz, K., Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E. (2017). Maturity and Readiness Model for Industry 4.0 Strategy Implementation of Industry 4.0 strategies require wide applications in companies. In Industry 4.0: Managing The Digital Transformation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_4spa
dc.relation.referencesYazici, M. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on payment systems in Turkey. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 07(5), 6911–6917.spa
dc.relation.referencesZelewsky. (2007). Kann Wissenschaftstheorie be- hilflich für die Publikationspraxis sein?spa
dc.relation.referencesZhong, R. Y., Xu, C., Chen, C., & Huang, G. Q. (2017). Big Data Analytics for Physical Internet-based intelligent manufacturing shop floors. International Journalspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc620 - Ingeniería y operaciones afines::629 - Otras ramas de la ingenieríaspa
dc.subject.ddc380 - Comercio , comunicaciones, transporte::388 - Transportespa
dc.subject.lembComercio electrónicospa
dc.subject.lembMercadeo por Internetspa
dc.subject.lembInternet marketingeng
dc.subject.proposalLogística 4.0spa
dc.subject.proposalEcommercespa
dc.subject.proposalModelo de Madurezspa
dc.subject.proposalIndustria 4.0spa
dc.subject.proposalLogistics 4.0eng
dc.subject.proposalEcommerceeng
dc.subject.proposalMaturity Modeleng
dc.subject.proposalIndustry 4.0eng
dc.titleModelo de madurez para la evaluación de la logística 4.0 en operaciones logísticas de ecommercespa
dc.title.translatedMaturity model for the evaluation of logistics 4.0 in e-commerce logistics operationseng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1033739334.2022.pdf
Tamaño:
4.88 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Ingeniería Industrial

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: