¡Apague y vámonos! Análisis de una controversia entre expertos y legos en los estrados judiciales colombianos: riesgos de la energía eléctrica
Cargando...
Archivos
Autores
Director
Tipo de contenido
Document language:
Español
Fecha
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Documentos PDF
Resumen
En la presente tesis se describe y analiza una controversia técnico-jurídica ocurrida entre un grupo de “legos” y un grupo de “expertos” en los estrados judiciales en Colombia entre los años 2007 y 2008 en torno a los riesgos asociados a la energía eléctrica. La controversia pasó por tres instancias judiciales, siendo la tercera y definitiva decidida en la Corte Constitucional. En la tesis se describe y analiza lo ocurrido usando algunas categorías del mapeo de controversias, e igualmente se observa como los aspectos jurídicos y técnicos se articulan y coproducen en los discursos y estrategias de los diferentes actores; todo lo anterior, girando siempre en torno a la idea de “riesgo” o de posibles “riesgos” asociados a las tecnologías de distribución y uso de la electricidad. Así mismo, se presta atención a algunos aspectos de la retórica experta, tanto técnica como jurídica.
Abstract; In the present thesis, a technic-juridical controversy between a group of “lay” people and a group of experts that took place in Colombian courts between 2007 and 2008 and that moved around the risks of electric energy, is described and analyzed. The controversy passed through three stages, being the last and definitive one in Colombian Constitutional Supreme Court. In the thesis, the description and analysis is made using some categories of the mapping of controversies, and also it is observed how juridical and technical aspects are articulated and coproduced in the discourses and strategies of different actors; all this, all the time, moving around the idea of “risk” or possible “risks” associated with technologies of distribution and use of electric energy. Also, attention is given to some aspects of expert-technical as well as expert-juridical rhetoric.
Abstract; In the present thesis, a technic-juridical controversy between a group of “lay” people and a group of experts that took place in Colombian courts between 2007 and 2008 and that moved around the risks of electric energy, is described and analyzed. The controversy passed through three stages, being the last and definitive one in Colombian Constitutional Supreme Court. In the thesis, the description and analysis is made using some categories of the mapping of controversies, and also it is observed how juridical and technical aspects are articulated and coproduced in the discourses and strategies of different actors; all this, all the time, moving around the idea of “risk” or possible “risks” associated with technologies of distribution and use of electric energy. Also, attention is given to some aspects of expert-technical as well as expert-juridical rhetoric.