La cosa juzgada internacional frente a los nuevos paradigmas de la reparación
Archivos
Autores
Cárdenas Mesa, John Arturo
Director
Tipo de contenido
Artículo de revista
Idioma del documento
EspañolFecha de publicación
2017-07-01
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Documentos PDF
Resumen
La forma confusa como se vienen valorandomutuamente las sentencias dela Corte Interamericana de DerechosHumanos y las sentencias del recursocontencioso-administrativo ha propiciadoabsurdos que de no ser corregidospropiciarán una forma de discriminaciónpara las víctimas de violaciones a derechoshumanos, en especial para las víctimasde desplazamiento forzado. Parasolucionar esto se requiere una interpretaciónacorde al nuevo paradigmajurídico-cultural que se viene gestandodesde hace más de una década en elderecho a la reparación de las víctimas.
The confusing manner as are mutually evaluating the judgments of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights and the judgments of the administrative appeal has led to absurdities that if are not corrected, will be a new form of discrimination for victims of violations of human rights and especially for victims of forced displacement. To solve this is requiered an interpretation according to the new cultural legal paradigm that has been brewing for more than a decade on the right to reparation of victims.
The confusing manner as are mutually evaluating the judgments of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights and the judgments of the administrative appeal has led to absurdities that if are not corrected, will be a new form of discrimination for victims of violations of human rights and especially for victims of forced displacement. To solve this is requiered an interpretation according to the new cultural legal paradigm that has been brewing for more than a decade on the right to reparation of victims.