Debates y Patrones de la Administración Pública en Colombia, un estudio de caso (2006 – 2014)
Cargando...
Autores
Rubio Quintero, David Fernando
Director
Tipo de contenido
Document language:
Español
Fecha
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Documentos PDF
Resumen
Esta investigación se preocupó por analizar la administración pública en Colombia entre los años 2006 y 2014, periodo comprendido por el gobierno de Álvaro Uribe Vélez (2006 – 2010) y Juan Manuel Santos Calderón (2010 – 2014), respectivamente. En este trabajo se abordan algunos debates conceptuales y se analiza la configuración de la administración pública colombiana desde aspectos como la meritocracia, la tecnocracia, la corrupción y el spoil systems. Al mismo tiempo, se estructura un ejercicio de estudio de caso, para identificar patrones reconocibles en los cargos directivos del orden nacional (Ministerios), dando como evidencia aspectos vinculados a la formación, la estabilidad y el recambio de estos cargos.
This research was concerned with analyzing the public administration in Colombia between 2006 and 2014, a period comprised by the government of Álvaro Uribe Vélez (2006 - 2010) and Juan Manuel Santos Calderón (2010 - 2014), respectively. This paper addresses some conceptual debates and analyzes the configuration of the Colombian public administration from aspects such as meritocracy, technocracy, corruption and spoil systems. At the same time, a case study exercise is structured to identify recognizable patterns in the national order (Ministries), giving as evidence aspects linked to the formation, stability and replacement of these positions.
This research was concerned with analyzing the public administration in Colombia between 2006 and 2014, a period comprised by the government of Álvaro Uribe Vélez (2006 - 2010) and Juan Manuel Santos Calderón (2010 - 2014), respectively. This paper addresses some conceptual debates and analyzes the configuration of the Colombian public administration from aspects such as meritocracy, technocracy, corruption and spoil systems. At the same time, a case study exercise is structured to identify recognizable patterns in the national order (Ministries), giving as evidence aspects linked to the formation, stability and replacement of these positions.