Traditio Animae : la interpretación aristotélica de las doctrinas presocráticas sobre el alma

dc.contributor.advisorCorrea Motta, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Castro, Liliana Carolina
dc.contributor.cvlacSánchez Castro, Liliana Carolina [0001203525]
dc.contributor.googlescholarSánchez Castro, Liliana Carolina [TBOjT9MAAAAJ&hl=en]
dc.contributor.orcidSánchez Castro, Liliana Carolina [0000-0003-1462-9726]
dc.contributor.researchgroupPeiras: Grupo de Estudios en Filosofía Antigua y Medieval
dc.contributor.scopusSánchez Castro, Liliana Carolina [55799783100]
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-14T13:45:36Z
dc.date.available2025-10-14T13:45:36Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractEl presente trabajo es un estudio del libro primero del De Anima de Aristóteles a la luz de la presencia más significativa que se encuentra en él: la recopilación de las opiniones sobre el alma que, según el Estagirita, tuvieron sus predecesores. La presencia de una preocupación en los filósofos presocráticos en torno al fenómeno de la vida no es de extrañarse; sin embargo, resulta interesante que los términos en que ellos se refirieron al tópico pudiera resultar de interés para Aristóteles. Por este motivo, me propongo realizar un estudio de la articulación de estas opiniones en el libro primero a la luz de dos claves interpretativas: la dialéctica y la tradición. La dialéctica porque es la herramienta metodológica que hace el diálogo de Aristóteles con sus predecesores; la tradición, porque la lectura que hace el Estagirita de las opiniones antiguas a la luz de su propia concepción del alma da lugar a una tradición interpretativa sobre los presocráticos que sólo se encuentra conectada con Aristóteles y su escuela (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractThe present work is a study of the first book of Aristotle’s De Anima in the light of the most significant presence in it: the compilation of views on the soul that, according to Aristotle, their predecessors had. The presence of a concern on the phenomenon of life is not surprising in pre-Socratic philosophy; however, it is interesting that the terms in which they referred to the topic might be of Aristotle’s interest. For this reason, I propose a study of the articulation of these views in the first book of the De Anima in the light of two interpretative keys: dialectic and tradition. Dialectic is the methodological tool that makes possible Aristotle’s dialogue with their predecessors. Tradition, on the other hand, arises from the reading Aristotle made of old opinions in the light of his own conception of the soul give birth to an interpretive tradition on the soul in pre-Socratic philosophy: this happens with Aristotle’s testimonies and his school.eng
dc.description.degreelevelDoctorado
dc.description.degreenameDoctora en Filosofía
dc.description.methodsLa unidad de la obra de los autores antiguos ha sido un problema protagónico en los estudios clásicos: la búsqueda de un estilo, de unidad doctrinal y el rastreo de los textos que se conservan hasta sus presuntos autores se inscriben en las dificultades propias de la transmisión de los mismos. El problema supone más desafíos en la medida en la que el corpus atribuido a un determinado autor sea más extenso. Es el caso de la obra aristotélica. Si bien la denominación ‘corpus aristotelicum’ delata los pudores de más de un editor a la hora de atribuir la composición de los tratados que conocemos como de autoría de puño y letra del Estagirita, la posible influencia de otras manos en la obra de Aristóteles puede ser considerada un asunto de edición y fijación de obras más que una atribución de obras a un maestro por parte de sus discípulos . Aunque el estudio de los puntos en común entre los textos que constituyen el legado de la obra intelectual del Estagirita que se conoce en la actualidad deja ya más preguntas que soluciones a dicho interrogante, esa misma dificultad surge a nivel de cada una de las obras particulares. Lo primero que se debe decir, dado que el foco de atención de la presente investigación es el De Anima y no todo el corpus, es que la paternidad aristotélica de este tratado nunca ha sido puesta en duda, ni en la Antigüedad ni en nuestros días . Sin embargo, esta situación dista de ser indicativa de un estado ideal del tratado. La cuestión de la transmisión del De Anima es fundamental a la hora de hacer de este tratado el inaugurador de una tradición interpretativa particular. Por esto, en el presente capítulo, me propongo mostrar el estatus del tratado en la discusión sobre la transmisión de las obras aristotélicas en la Antigüedad, con el fin de dar cuenta de las razones y las objeciones que habría para otorgarle el estatus de iniciador de la tradición interpretativa relativa los presocráticos en torno a las teorías sobre el alma. Para llevar a cabo esta tarea, voy a comenzar por hacer una reconstrucción de la historia de la transmisión de las obras aristotélicas, dedicando especial atención a lo que compete al De Anima: el conocimiento que se tuvo de este tratado durante la Antigüedad y sus menciones en los catálogos. El relato de esta historia va a hacer evidentes una serie de relatos contradictorios, cuando no inexistentes, sobre el De Anima, así como inconsistencias relativas a su unidad. Así, como segundo paso, voy a poner de manifiesto el estado de la discusión sobre la unidad del tratado, mostrando cómo la cuestión de la unidad del tratado es un asunto en el que tomar partido es imposible dado el estado de la información. Sin embargo, estoy muy interesada en poner de manifiesto el hecho fundamental de que el De Anima fue conocido por los comentaristas como una unidad. Mi insistencia en este punto no es una toma de partido con respecto a la unidad del tratado. La posición por la que me siento inclinada es, más bien, la constatación de que a partir de una determinada época, el De Anima se conoció como una unidad y esto corresponde con su papel como origen de la tradición interpretativa de la que vengo hablando.
dc.description.researchareaFilosofía Antigua
dc.format.extent338 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/89027
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanas
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Doctorado en Filosofía
dc.relation.referencesBALLÉRIAUX, OMER (1996) “Eugénios, père de Thémistios et philosophe néoplatoicien”. En: L’Antiquité Classique Tome LXV, 1996, pp. 135-160.
dc.relation.referencesBALTUSSEN, HANS (2000) Theophrastus against the presocratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in De Sensibus. Leiden: Brill, Philosophia Antiqua Vol. 86.
dc.relation.references__________ (1992) “Peripatetic Dialectic in the De Sensibus”. En: FORTENBAUGH & GUTAS (1992) Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings, pp. 1-19.
dc.relation.referencesBARNES, JONATHAN (1999) “Roman Aristotle”. En: BARNES & GRIFFIN (1999) Philosophia Togata II, pp. 1-69.
dc.relation.references__________ (1980) “Aristotle and the Method of Ethics”. En: Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34, pp. 490-511.
dc.relation.references__________ (1979) The Presocratic Philosophers, vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
dc.relation.references__________ (1975) “Aristotle’s theory of demonstration”. En: BARNES, SCHOFIELD & SORABJI [EDS.] (1975) Articles on Aristotle I, pp. 65-87.
dc.relation.referencesBARNES, JONATHAN [TRAD. & ED.] (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBARNES, J. & GRIFFIN, M. [EDS.] (1999) Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesBARNES, J. & JOUANNA, J. [EDS.] (2002) Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique XLIX: Galien et la Philosophie. Genève: Vandoeuvres.
dc.relation.referencesBARNES, J., SCHOFIELD, M. & SORABJI, R. [EDS.] (1979) Articles on Aristotle III: Metaphysics. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.references__________ (1975) Articles on Aristotle I: Science. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesBARTHÉLEMY-SAINT-HILAIRE, J. [TRAD.] (1879) Métaphysique d’Aristote, tome premier. Paris: Germer-Baillière.
dc.relation.referencesBATTEGAZZORE, A. & UNTERSTEINER, M. [TRAD. & COMM.] (1962) Sofisti: testimonianze e frammenti, fascicolo quarto: Antifonte, Crizia. Firenza: La Nuova Italia.
dc.relation.referencesBATTISTINI, YVES [TRAD.] (1948) Héraclite d’Éphèse. Paris: Cahiers d’Art.
dc.relation.referencesBEKKER, IMMANUEL [ED. & COMM.] (1826) Platonis scripta graece omnia, vol. I. London: Valpy.
dc.relation.referencesACCATTINO, PAOLO [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (2005) De Anima II (Mantissa). Alessandria: Dell’Orso.
dc.relation.references__________ (2001) Alessandro di Afrodisia: De Intellectu. Torino: Thélème.
dc.relation.referencesACCATTINO, P. & DONINI, P. [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1996) Alessandro di Afrodisia: L’Anima. Roma: Laterza.
dc.relation.referencesACKRILL, J. L. (1972) “ Aristotle’s Definitions of psuche”. En: Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, vol. 73, pp. 119-133.
dc.relation.referencesADAMSON, P.; BALTUSSEN, H. & STONE, M. [EDS.] (2004) Philosophy, Science & Exegesis in Greek, Arabic & Latin Commentaries I. London: Institute of Classical Studies University of London.
dc.relation.referencesALGRA, K.; BARNES, J.; MANSFELD, J. & SCHOFIELD, M. [EDS.] (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesALLEN, T. W. [ED.] (1931) Homeri Ilias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesANTON, J. & KUSTAS, G. [EDS.] (1972 [1971]) Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
dc.relation.referencesARMISEN-MARCHETTI, MIREILLE [ED. & TRAD.] (2001) Macrobe: Commentaire au Songe de Scipion vol. 1. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesBAILEY, CYRIL (1928) The Greek Atomist and Epicurus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesBENAKIS, LINOS [ED.] (1984) Proceedings of the First International Congress on Democritus (XAnthi, 6-9 october 1983). Xanthi: International Democritean Foundation.
dc.relation.referencesBERNAYS, JACOB (1863) Die Dialoge des Aristoteles. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz.
dc.relation.referencesBERGERON, M. & DUFOUR, R. [TRADS.] (2008) Alexandre d’Aphrodise: De l’âme. Paris: Vrin.
dc.relation.referencesBERTI, ENRICO (1996) “Does Aristotle’s Dialectic Develop?” En: WIANS [ED.] Aristotle’s Philosophical Development, pp. 105-130
dc.relation.references__________ (1962) La filosofía del primo Aristotele. Padova: CedamAntonio Milani.
dc.relation.referencesBIEHL, GUILELMUS [ED.] (1896) Aristotelis De Anima Libri III. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesBIGNONE, ETTORE (2007) L’Aristotele perduto et la formazione filosófica di Epicuro. Milano: Bompiani.
dc.relation.referencesBIRT, THEODOR (1974 [1882]) Das Antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältnis zur Literatur. Stuttgart: Scientia Verlag Aalen.
dc.relation.referencesBLUMENTHAL, HENRY J. (1990) “Neoplatonic elements in the de Anima commentaries”. En: SORABJI (1990) Aristotle Transformed, pp. 305-324.
dc.relation.references__________ (1987a ) “Alexander of Aphrodisias in the later Greek Commentaries on Aristotle’s De Anima”. En: WIESNER (1987) Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung, pp. 90-106.
dc.relation.references__________ (1987b ) “Simplicius (?) on the first book of Aristotle’s De Anima”. En: HADOT (1987) Simplicius: sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie, pp. 91-112.
dc.relation.references__________ (1982) “John Philoponus and Stephanus of Alexandria: Two Neoplatonic Christian Commentators on Aristotle?”. En: O’MEARA (1982) Neoplatonism and Christian Thought, pp. 54-63.
dc.relation.references__________ (1979a ) “Photius on Themistius (cod. 74). Did Themistius write Commentaries on Aristotle?” En: Hermes 107, pp. 168-182.
dc.relation.references__________ (1979b ) “Themistius, the Last Peripatetic Commentator on Aristotle”. En: BOWERSOCK, BURKERT & PUTNAM (1979) Arktouros, pp. 390-400. - Reimpreso en SORABJI (1990) Aristotle Transformed, pp. 113-123.
dc.relation.references__________ (1974) “Did Iamblicus Write a Commentary on the de Anima?”. En: Hermes 102, pp. 540-556.
dc.relation.referencesBLUMENTHAL, HENRY J. [TRAD.] (2000) ‘Simplicius’ on Aristotle: On the Soul 3. 1-5. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesBODÉÜS, RICHARD (1974) “De la poésie à la métaphysique: regard sur un thème d’Empédocle”. En: Revue Belge de philosophie et d’histoire vol. 52, pp. 36- 58.
dc.relation.referencesBODÉÜS, R. [TRAD.] (1993) Aristote: De l’âme. Paris: Flammarion.
dc.relation.referencesBODNÁR, I. & FORTENBAUGH, W. [EDS.] (2002) Eudemus of Rhodes. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, Vol. XI. New BrunswickLondon: Transaction Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesBODRERO, EMILIO [TRAD.] (1978) Eraclito: testimonianze e frammenti. Roma: Giorgio Bretschneider.
dc.relation.referencesBOERI, MARCELO [TRAD.] (2010) Aristóteles: Acerca del alma. Buenos Aires: Colihue.
dc.relation.referencesBOLLACK, JEAN [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1969c ) Empédocle, vol. III: les origines, commentaire 2. Paris: Minuit.
dc.relation.references__________ (1969b ) Empédocle, vol. III: les origines, commentaire 1. Paris: Minuit.
dc.relation.references__________ (1969a ) Empédocle, vol. II: les origines. Paris: Minuit.
dc.relation.references__________ (1965) Empédocle, vol. 1: introduction à l’ancienne physique. Lille: Taffin-Lefort.
dc.relation.referencesBOLLACK, J. & WISMANN, H. [TRAD. & COMM.] (1972) Héraclite ou la séparation. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
dc.relation.referencesBOLTON, ROBERT (1999) “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic”. En: SIM (1999) From Puzzles to Principles, pp. 57-106. - Reimpreso en: (2010) “Le fondement épistémologique de la dialectique aristotélicienne”. En: BOLTON (2010) Science, dialectique et ethique chez Aristote: essais d’épistémologie aristotélicienne, pp. 11-76.
dc.relation.references__________ (1994) “The Problem of Dialectical Reasoning in Aristotle”. En: BOLTON & SMITH (1994) [EDS.] Logic, Dialectic and Science in Aristotle, pp. 99- 132.
dc.relation.references__________ (1978) “Aristotle’s Definitions of the Soul: De Anima ii, 1-3”. En: Phronesis, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 258-278.
dc.relation.referencesBOLTON, R. [ED.] (2010) Science, dialectique et ethique chez Aristote: essais d’épistémologie aristotélicienne. Louvaine La Neuve: Peeters.
dc.relation.referencesBOLTON, R. & SMITH, R. (1994) [EDS.] Logic, Dialectic and Science in Aristotle. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.
dc.relation.referencesBONITZ, HERMANN (1955) Index Aristotelicus. Graz: Akademische Druck- U. Verlagsanstalt.
dc.relation.references__________ (1873) “Zur Erklärung Einiger Stellen aus Aristoteles' Schrift Über die Seele”. En: Hermes 7, pp. 416-436.
dc.relation.referencesBONITZ, HERMANN [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1848) Aristotelis Metaphysica. Berlin: Marcus.
dc.relation.referencesBOS, A. P. (1989) Cosmic and Meta-cosmic Theology in Aristotle’s Lost Dialogues. Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesBOWERSOCK, G.; BURKERT, W. & PUTNAM, M. [EDS.] (1979) Arktouros: Hellenic Studies presented to Bernard M. W. Knox on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesBRANCACCI, A. & MOREL, P-M. [EDS.] (2007) Democritus: Science, the Arts and the Care of the Soul. Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesBRANDIS, CHRISTIAN (1853) Handbuch der Geschichte der griechischrömischen Philosophie: Aristoteles, seine akademischen Zeitgenossen und nachsten Nachfolger. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesBROWN, V.; HANKINS, J. & KASTER, R. [EDS.] (2003) Catalogus Translationum et Commentatorium: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries VIII. Washington D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press
dc.relation.referencesBRUNS, I. [ED.] (1892) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, suppl. 2.2: Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesBRUNSCHWIG, JACQUES [ED. & TRAD.] (2009) Aristote: Topiques. París: Le Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesBULTRIGHINI, UMBERTO (1999) Maledetta democracia: studi su Crizia. Torino: Edizioni dell’Orso.
dc.relation.referencesBURKERT, WALTER (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Traducción de Edwin L. Minar Jr. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBURNET, JOHN (1920) Early Greek Philosophy. London: A & C Black.
dc.relation.referencesBURNET, J. [ED.] (1968 [1903]) Platonis opera, vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1967a [1907]) Platonis opera, vol. 5. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1967b [1901]) Platonis opera, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1967c [1900]) Platonis opera, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesBUSSE, ADOLFUS (1900) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca vol. XVIII: Eliae In Porphyrii Isagogen et Aristotelis Categorias Commentaria. Berolini: Georgii Reimeri.
dc.relation.referencesBYWATER, I. [ED.] (1962) Aristotelis Ethiica Nicomachea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1877) Heracliti Ephesii Reliquiae. Oxonii: Typhographeo Clarendoniano.
dc.relation.referencesCALAME, CLAUDE (2000) Le récit en Grèce ancienne. Paris: Belin.
dc.relation.referencesCALONGE, J.; LLEDÓ, E. & GARCÍA GUAL, C. [TRADS.] (1981) Platón: Diálogos I. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesCALONGE, J.; ACOSTA, E.; OLIVIERI, F. & CALVO, J. [TRADS.] (1983) Platón: Diálogos II. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesCALVO, TOMÁS [TRAD.] (1994) Aristóteles: Metafísica. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.references__________ (1978) Aristóteles: Acerca del Alma. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesCANDEL, MIGUEL [TRAD.] (1996) Aristóteles: Acerca del Cielo; Meteorológicos. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.references__________ (1988) Tratados de lógica (órganon): Sobre la Interpretación; Analíticos Primeros; Analíticos Segundos. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesCANO, J.; HERNÁNDEZ, D. & LEDESMA, A. [TRADS.] (2007) Plutarco: Vidas Paralelas V. Lisandro, Sila, Cimón, Lúculo, Nicias y Craso. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesCAPELLE, W. (1924) “Heracliteum”. En: Hermes 59, H. 1 (Mar. 1924), pp. 121-123.
dc.relation.referencesCAPELLETTI, ANGEL (1984) La filosofía de Anaxágoras. Caracas: Sociedad Venezolana de Filosofía.
dc.relation.referencesCAPIZZI, ANTONIO (1995) Paradigma, mito, scienza: studi sul pensiero greco. Roma: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale.
dc.relation.references__________ (1982) La republica cosmica: appunti per una storia non peripatetica della nascita della filosofia en Grecia. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
dc.relation.referencesCAPPS, E.; PAGE, T. E. & ROUSE, W. H. D. [EDS.] (1928) Athenaeus: The Deipnosophists II. London-New York: William Heinemann- Putnam’s Sons.
dc.relation.references__________ (1927) Athenaeus: The Deipnosophists I. London-New York: William Heinemann- Putnam’s Sons.
dc.relation.referencesCARBONARA, MIRELLA (1969) Σπέρματα, νοῦς, χρήματα nella dottrina di anassagora. Napoli: Librería Scientifica Editrice.
dc.relation.referencesCARPENTER, AMBER (2010) “What is peculiar to Plato’s and Aristotle’s psychologies? What is common to them both?” En: HARTE & ALII (2010) Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato, pp. 21-44.
dc.relation.referencesCENTRONE, BRUNO (1996) Introduzione a i Pitagorici. Roma: Laterza
dc.relation.referencesCHAIGNET, A. (1873b ) Pythagore et la philosophie pythagoricienne, tome 2. Paris: Didier.
dc.relation.referencesCHANTRAINE, PIERRE (1968) Dictionaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Paris: Klincksiek.
dc.relation.referencesCHARLTON, WILLIAM [TRAD.] (2005) Philoponus on Aristotle On the Soul 2.1-6. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.references__________ (2000) Philoponus on Aristotle On the Soul 3.1-8. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesCHERNISS, HAROLD (1991 [1935]) La crítica aristotélica a la filosofía presocrática. Traducción de Loretta Brass, Nicole Ooms, Luis Helguera y Maite Brosa. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
dc.relation.references__________ (1935) Aristotle´s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.
dc.relation.referencesCHROUST, ANTON-HERMANN (1973ª) Aristotle: New light on his life and on some of his lost works I. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
dc.relation.references__________ (1973b ) Aristotle: New light on his life and on some of his lost works II. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
dc.relation.referencesCLEVE, FELIX (1973) The Philosophy of Anaxagoras. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
dc.relation.referencesCOLLI, GIORGO [TRAD. & COMM.] (1978) La sapienza greca II. Milano: Adelphi.
dc.relation.referencesCONCHE, MARCEL [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1986) Héraclite: Fragments. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
dc.relation.referencesCORDERO, N.; OLIVIERI, F.; LA CROCE, E.; & EGGERS, C. [TRADS.] (1979) Los filósofos presocráticos II. Madrid, Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesCRANZ, F. EDWARD (1960) “Alexander Aphrodisiensis”. En: KRISTELLER (1960) Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum I, pp. 77-135.
dc.relation.referencesCRESPO, EMILIO [TRAD.] (1991) Homero: Ilíada. Madrid: Gredos
dc.relation.referencesCURD, PATRICIA (2011) A Presocratics Reader: Selected Fragments and Testimony. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett.
dc.relation.references__________ (2007) Anaxagoras of Clazomenae. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
dc.relation.referencesDAVIES, J. K. (1971) Athenian Propertied Families 600-300 b. C. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesDE ECHANDÍA, GUILLERMO [TRAD.] (1995) Aristóteles: Física. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesDE HOZ GARCÍA-BELLIDO, MARÍA PAZ [TRAD.] (2003) Estrabón: Geografía, libros XI-XIV. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesDE IVÁNKA, ANDRÉ (1930) “Sur la composition du De Anima d’Aristote”. En: Revue Néo-scolastique de philosophie 32, deuxième série No. 25, pp. 75-83.
dc.relation.referencesDE LACY, PHILLIP. [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1984) Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4,1,2: Galeni de placitis Hippocratis et Platonis. Berlin: Akademie– Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesDE MARCO, C. W. (1995) “Plato’s Ghost: Consequences of Aristotelian Dialectic”. En: SIM (1995) The Crossroads of Norm and Nature: Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics and Metaphysics.
dc.relation.referencesDE PATER, W. A. S.C.J. (1965) Les topiques d’Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne: la méthodologie de la définition. Fribourg: Ed. St. Paul.
dc.relation.referencesDENNISTON, J. D. (1960 [1952]) Greek Prose Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1954) The Greek Particles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesDES PLACES, ÉDOUARD S.J. [TRAD.] (1987) Eusèbe de Césarée: La préparation évangélique. Paris: Du Cerf.
dc.relation.referencesDIEHL, E. [ED.] (1965) Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum commentaria, 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesDIELS, HERMANN [ED.] (1965 [1879]) Doxographi Graeci. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.references__________ (1893) Anonymi Londinensis ex Aristotelis iatricis Menoniis et aliis medicis eclogae. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.references__________ (1882-95) Simplicii in Aristotelis physicorum libros octo commentaria, 2 vols. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesDIELS, H. & KRANZ, W. [ED.] (1922b [1901]) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, zweiter Band. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
dc.relation.references__________ (1922a [1901]) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, erster Band. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buschhandlung.
dc.relation.referencesDILCHER, ROMAN (1995) Spudasmata 56: Studies in Heraclitus. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesDILLON, JOHN (2003) The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347- 247 BC). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesDROSSAART LULOFS, H. J. [ED.] (1972 [1965]) Aristotelis de Generatione Animalium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesDÜRING, INGEMAR (2005 [1966]) Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
dc.relation.references__________ (1971) “Ptolemy’s Vita Aristotelis rediscovered”. En: PALMER & HAMERTON-KELLY (1971) Philomates, pp. 264-269.
dc.relation.references__________ (1957) Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.
dc.relation.referencesDÜRING, I. & OWEN, G. E. L. [EDS.] (1960) Aristotle and Plato in the mifourth Century: Papers of the Symposium Aristotelicum held at Oxford in August 1957. Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia XI. Göteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.
dc.relation.referencesDYCK, ANDREW [ED.] (2003) Cicero, De Natura Deorum Liber I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesEGGERS, C. & JULIÁ, V. [TRADS.] (1978) Los filósofos presocráticos I. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesEVANS, J. D. G. (1991) “Ancient and modern dialectic”. En: Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 33.
dc.relation.references__________ (1977) Aristotle’s Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesFAZZO, SILVIA (2004) “Aristotelianism as a commentary tradition”. En: ADAMSON, BALTUSSEN & STONE (2004) Philosophy, Science and Exegesis, pp. 1- 19.
dc.relation.referencesFESTUGIÈRE, A. J. [TRAD.] (1968) Proclus: Commentaire sur le Timée, tome cinquième. Paris: Vrin.
dc.relation.referencesFINAMORE, J. & DILLON, J. [EDS., TRADS. & COMM.] (2002) Iamblicus De Anima. Brill: Leiden.
dc.relation.referencesFLACELIÈRE, R. & CHAMBRY, E. [EDS. & TRADS.] (1971) Plutarque: Vies tome VI. Pyrrhos-Marius; Lysandre-Sylla. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesFORBES, F.H. [EDS.] (1967 [1919]) Aristotelis meteorologicorum libri quattuor. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press, 1919, Repr. 1967.
dc.relation.referencesFORTENBAUGH, W. & GUTAS, D. [EDS.] (1992) Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings. London: Transaction Publishers, Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities Vol. 5.
dc.relation.referencesFORTENBAUGH, W. & SCHÜTRUMPF, E. [EDS.] (2001) Dicearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, Vol. X. New Brunswick-London: Transaction Publichers.
dc.relation.referencesFORTENBAUGH, W. & WHITE, S. [EDS.] (2004) Lyco of Troas and Hyeronymus of Rhodes: Text, Translation, and Discussion. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, Vol. XII. New Brunswick-London: Transaction Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesFREDE D. & REIS, B. [EDS.] (2007) Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesFREDE, MICHAEL (1999) “Epilogue”. En: ALGRA, BARNES, MANSFELD & SCHOFIELD (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, pp. 771-797.
dc.relation.referencesFURLEY, DAVID (1967) Two Studies in the Greek Atomists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesFURTH, MONTGOMERY (1988) Substance, Form and Psyche: an Aristotelean metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGALLEGO, A. & MUÑOZ, T. [TRADS.] (1993) Sexto Empírico: Esbozos pirrónicos. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesGALSTON, MIRIAM (1982) “Aristotle’s Dialectic, Refutation, and Inquiry”. En: Dialogue XXI (1982), pp. 79-93.
dc.relation.referencesGANSON, TODD STUART (2004) “Third-Century Peripatetics on Vision”. En: FORTENBAUGH & WHITE (2004) Lyco of Troas and Hyeronymus of Rhodes, pp. 355-362.
dc.relation.referencesGARCÍA GUAL, C.; MARTÍNEZ, M.; LLEDÓ, E. [TRADS.] (1986) Diálogos III: Fedón, Banquete, Fedro. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesGAVALOTTI, CARLO [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1975) Empedocle: poema fisico e lustrale. Milano: Valla- Mondadori.
dc.relation.referencesGERSHENSON, D. & GREENBERG, D. (1964) Anaxagoras and the Birth of Physics. New York: Blaisdell Publishing Company.
dc.relation.referencesGIARDINA, GIOVANNA [TRAD. & COMM.] (2008) Aristotele: Sulla generazione e la corruzione. Roma: Aracne.
dc.relation.referencesGILBERT, OTTO (1907) Die meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesGIGON, OLOF (1960) “Prolegomena to an Edition of the Eudemus”. En: DÜRING & OWEN (1960) Aristotle and Plato in the mi-fourth Century, pp. 19-33.
dc.relation.referencesGOHLKE, PAUL (1952) Aristoteles und sein Werk. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
dc.relation.referencesGOHLKE, P. [TRAD.] (1947) Aristoteles: Über die Seele. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh
dc.relation.referencesGOMPERZ, THÉODORE (1910) Les penseurs de la Gréce. Histoire de la Philosophie Antique 3: L’ancienne Académie; Aristote et ses sucesseurs; Théophraste et Straton de Lamsaque. Traduction par. A. Reymond. Paris – Lausanne: Librairie Félix Alcan – Payot & Cie. Éditeurs.
dc.relation.references__________ (1908) Les penseurs de la Grèce: Histoire de la Philosophie Antique 1. Traduction par A. Reymond. Paris – Lausanne: Librairie Félix Alcan – Payot & Cie. Éditeurs.
dc.relation.referencesGONZÁLEZ, JUÁN FELIPE [TRAD. & COMM.] (2010) Aristóteles: Tópicos libro primero. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesGOTTHELF, ALLAN (1985) “Notes toward a Study of Substance and Essence in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals ii-iv”. En: GOTTHELF [ED.] (1985) Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, pp. 27-54.
dc.relation.referencesGOTTHELF, A. [ED.] (1985) Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies. Pittsburgh-Bristol: Mathesis Publications & Bristol Classical Press.
dc.relation.referencesGOTTHELF, A.; LENNOX, J. [EDS.] (1987) Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGOTTSCHALK, HANS (2004) “Peripatetic Reactions to Hellenistic Epistemology”. En: FORTENBAUGH & WHITE (2004) Lyco of Troas and Hyeronymus of Rhodes, pp. 375-388.
dc.relation.references__________ (1990) “The earliest Aristotelian commentators”. En: Sorabji (1990) Aristotle Transformed, pp. 55-82.
dc.relation.references__________ (1971) “Soul as Harmonia”. En: Phronesis vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 179-198.
dc.relation.referencesGOTTSCHALK, H. B. [ED. & COMM.] (1965) “Strato of Lampsacus: Some Texts”. En: Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, Vol. XI, Part VI, pp. 95-182.
dc.relation.referencesGOULET-CAZÉ, M. [ED.] (1999) Diogène Laërce: Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres. Paris: La Pochothèque.
dc.relation.referencesGOW, A. S. F [ED. TRAD. & COMM.] (1952a ) Theocritus vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1952b ) Theocritus vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGUTHRIE, W. K. C. (1975) A History of Greek Philosophy IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1971) The Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1965) A History of Greek Philosophy II: The presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1962) A History of Greek Philosophy I: The earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHAASE, WOLFGANG [ED.] (1990) Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (ANRW) II.36.4. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesHACKFORTH, R. [TRAD. & COMM.] (1952) Plato’s Phaedrus. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
dc.relation.referencesHADOT, ILSETRAUT (1987) “Recherches sur les fragments du commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote”. En: HADOT (1987) Peripatoi XV. Simplicius: sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie, pp. 225-245.
dc.relation.referencesHADOT, I. [ED.] (1987) Peripatoi XV. Simplicius: sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Actes du colloque international de Paris (28 Sept. – 1 Oct. 1985). BerlinNew York: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesHARMON, A. M. [ED.] (1960 [1915]) Lucian. Cambridge (Ms): Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHARTE, V.; MCCABE, M.; SHARPLES, R. & SHEPPARD, A. [EDS.] (2010) Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 107). London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of London.
dc.relation.referencesHAYDUCK, M. [ED.] (1897) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 15: Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis de anima libros commentaria. Berolini: Georgii Reimeri.
dc.relation.references__________ (1888) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 6.2: Asclepii in Aristotelis metaphysicorum libros A–Z commentaria. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.references__________ (1882) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 11: Simplicii in libros Aristotelis de anima commentaria. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesHEINZE, R. [ED.] (1899) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 5.3: Themistii in libros Aristotelis de anima paraphrasis. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesHEITZ, EMIL (1865) Die verlorenen Schriften des Aristoteles. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesHICKS, R. D. [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1907) Aristotle: De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHUBY, PAMELA (1999) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought & Influence. Commentary, Volume 4, Psychology (with contributions on the Arabic Material by Dimitri Gutas). Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesHUBY, P. & STEEL, C. [TRADS.] (1997) Priscian: On Theophrastus on SensePerception; Simplicius: On Aristotle, On the Soul 2.5-12. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesHUFFMANN, CARL (2007) “The pythagorean Conception of the Soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus”. En: FREDE D. & REIS (2007) Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 21-43.
dc.relation.references__________ (1993) Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.referencesHUSAIN, MARTHA (1999) “For Dialectic Puts Questions about Matter which Philosophy knows”. En: SIM (1999) From Puzzles to Principles? pp. 1-14.
dc.relation.referencesIANNUCCI, ALESSANDRO (2002) La parola e l’azione: i frammenti simposiali di Crizia. Bologna: Nautilus.
dc.relation.referencesIRWIN, TERENCE H. (1988) Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesISNARDI, MARGHERITA (1996) “Speusippe et Xénocrate dans le libre I du De Anima”. En: ROMEYER & VIANO (1996) Corps et ame, pp. 107-123.
dc.relation.referencesJAEGER, WERNER (2002 [1933]) Paideia: los ideales de la cultura griega. Traducción de Joaquín Xirau y Wenceslao Roces. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.references__________ (1948) The Theology of Early Greek Philosophers. Traducción de Edward Robinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1923) Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
dc.relation.referencesJAEGER, W. [ED.] (1913) Aristotelis de animalium motione et de animalium incessu. Ps.-Aristotelis de spiritu libellus. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesJANNONE, A. [ED.] & BARBOTIN, E. [TRAD.] (1966) Aristote: De l’Âme. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesJOACHIM, HAROLD [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1922) Aristotle: On Coming-to-be and Passing-away. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesJOHANSEN, THOMAS (2006) “What’s new in the De Sensu. The Place of the De Sensu in Aristotle’s Psychology”. En: KING (2006) Common to Body and Soul, pp. 140-164.
dc.relation.referencesJONES, W. H. S. [TRAD, & COMM.] (2010 [1947]) The Medical Writings of Anonymus Londinensis. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesKAHN, CHARLES [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1979) The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesKAIBEL, G. [ED.] (1966) Athenaei Naucratitae deipnosophistarum libri xv, 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesKAMTEKAR, RACHANA (2009) “Knowing by Likeness in Empedocle”. En: Phronesis 54, 215-238.
dc.relation.referencesKAYSER, C.L. [ED.] (1964 [1971]) Flavii Philostrati opera, vol. 2”. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesKING, R. [ED.] (2006) Common to Body and Soul. Berlin: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesKIRCHNER, IOHANNES (1901) Prosopographia Attica, volumen prius. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesKIRK, GEOFFREY [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1962 [1954]) The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesKIRK, G. S. & RAVEN, J. E. [EDS., TRADS. & COMM.] (1957) The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesKLEIN, U. [ED.] (1975) Iamblichi de vita Pythagorica liber. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesKRISTELLER, P. [ED.] (1960) Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum I: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries. Washington D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
dc.relation.referencesKRISTELLER, P. & CRANZ F. E. [EDS.] (1971) Catalogus Translationum et Commentatorium II: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries. Washington D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
dc.relation.referencesKUCHARSKI, PAUL (1952) Étude sur la doctrine pythagoricienne de la tétrade. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesKÜHN, C.G. [ED. & TRAD.] (1965 [1830]) Claudii Galeni opera omnia, vol. 18.2. Leipzig: Knobloch.
dc.relation.referencesLA CROCE, E. & BERNABÉ, A. [TRADS.] (1987) Aristóteles: Acerca de la generación y la corrupción; Tratados breves de historia natural. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesLAKS, ANDRÉ (1993) “Mind’s Crisis: On Anaxagoras’ ΝΟΥΣ”. Em: The Southern Journal of Philosophy 31, Supplement 1993, pp. 19-38.
dc.relation.referencesLAKS, A. [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (2008 [1983]) Diogène d’Apollonie. Sankt Agustin: Academia Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesLAKS, A. & MOST, G. [EDS., & TRADS.] (1993) Théophraste: Métaphysique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesLASALLE, FERDINAND (1858) Die Philosophie Herakleitos des Dunklen von Ephesos. Berlin: Verlag von Franz Duncker.
dc.relation.referencesLAURENTI, RENATO (1999) Empedocle. Napoli: D’aurea editore.
dc.relation.referencesLAUTNER, PETER (2004) “The Historical Setting of Hyeronimus fr. 10 White (= fr. 53 Wehrli)”. En: FORTENBAUGH & WHITE (2004) Lyco of Troas and Hyeronymus of Rhodes, pp. 363-374.
dc.relation.referencesLE BLOND, J. M. (1979) “Aristotle on Definition”. En: BARNES, SCHOFIELD & SORABJI (1979) Articles on Aristotle III: Metaphysics, pp. 63-79.
dc.relation.referencesLEE, H. D. P. (1935) “Geometrical Method and Aristotle's Account of First Principles”. En: The Classical Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Apr., 1935), pp. 113-124.
dc.relation.referencesLERNER, MICHEL-PIERRE (1969) Recherches sur la notion de finalité chez Aristote. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
dc.relation.referencesLESHER, J. H. (1999) “Mind’s Knowledge and Powers of Control in Anaxagoras DKb12”. En: Phronesis 40, no. 2, pp. 125-142.
dc.relation.referencesLIDDLE, H.; SCOTT, R. & JONES, H. (1996) A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesLLOYD, G. E. R. (1979) Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1970) Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle. London: Chatto & Windus.
dc.relation.references__________ (1964) The Hot and the Cold, the Dry and the Wet in Greek Philosophy. En: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 84, pp. 92-106.
dc.relation.referencesLLOYD, G. E. R. & OWEN, G. E. L. [EDS.] (1978) Aristotle on Mind and the Senses: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLONG, A. A. (2011) “Heraclitus and Stoicism”. En: LONG (2001) Stoic Studies, pp. 35-57.
dc.relation.references__________ (1966) “Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?” En: The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 16, No. 2 (Nov., 1966), pp. 256-276.
dc.relation.referencesLONG, A. A. [ED.] (2001 [1996]) Stoic Studies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
dc.relation.referencesLONG, H. S. [ED.] (1966 [1964]) Diogenis Laertii vitae philosophorum, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesLONGRIGG, JAMES (1993) Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesLOUIS, P. [ED. & TRAD.] (1964) Aristote: Histoire des animaux 1. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.references__________ (1956) Aristote: Les parties des animaux. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesLOUX, MICHAEL (2004) Nature, Norm and Psyche: explorations in Aristotle’s philosophical psychology. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
dc.relation.referencesMADDALENA, ANTONIO (1963) Ionici: testimonianze e frammenti. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
dc.relation.referencesMAHONEY, EDWARD (1982) “Neoplatonism, the Greek Commentators, and Renaissance Aristotelianism”. En: O’MEARA (1982) Neoplatonism and Christian Thought, pp. 169-177.
dc.relation.referencesMANETTI, DANIELA (1999) “The Role of Doxography in the Anonymus Londiniensis”. En: VAN DER EIJK (1999) Ancient Histories of Medicine, pp. 95-141.
dc.relation.referencesMANETTI, D. [ED.] (2011) Anonymvs Londinensis: De Medicina. Berlin: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesMANSFELD, JAAP (2010a ) “Aristote et la structure du De Sensibus de Théophraste”. En: MANSFELD & RUNIA (2010) Aëtiana III, pp. 203-236.
dc.relation.references__________ (2010b ) “Physikai doxai and problêmata physika in Philosophy and Rhetoric: From Aristotle to Aëtius (and Beyond)”. En: MANSFELD & RUNIA (2010) Aëtiana III, pp. 33-98.
dc.relation.references__________ (1990) “Doxography and Dialectic. The Sitz im Leben of the ‘Placita’”. En: HAASE (1990) ANRW II.36.4, pp. 3056-3229.
dc.relation.referencesMANSFELD, J. & RUNIA, D. T. [EDS.] (2010) Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, Vol. III. Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesMANSION, AUGUSTIN (1961) “L’origine dy syllogisme et la théorie de la science chez Aristote”. En: S. MANSION (1961) Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, pp. 57-81.
dc.relation.referencesMANSION, SUZANNE (1984) Études aristotéliciennes: recueil d’Articles. Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’institut supérieur de philosophie.
dc.relation.references__________ (1978) “Soul and Life in the De Anima”. En: LLOYD & OWEN [EDS.] Aristotle on Mind and Senses, pp. 1-20.
dc.relation.references__________ (1961) “Le rôle de l’éxposé et de la critique des philosophies antérieures chez Aristote”. En: S. MANSION (1961) Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, pp. 35-56.
dc.relation.references__________ (1946) Le jugement d’existence chez Aristote. Louvain-Paris: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie- Desclée de Brower.
dc.relation.referencesMANSION, S. [ED.] (1961) Aristote et les problèmes de méthode: Symposim Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au 1er septiembre 1960. Louvain-Paris: Publications Universitaires de l’Université de Louvain- Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.
dc.relation.referencesMARCOVICH, MIROSLAV [ED.] (1999) Diogenis Laertii: Vitae Philosophorum, vol. I, Libri I-X. Sttutgart-Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.references__________ (1986) Hippolytus: Refutatio omnium haeresium. Berlin: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesMARCOVICH, M. [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1967) Heraclitus. Mérida (Ven.): The los Andes University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMARTIN, A. & PRIMAVESI, O. [ED. & COMM.] (1999) L’Empédocle de Strasbourg. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesMARTOS, JUAN FRANCISCO [TRAD.] (2012) Sexto Empírico: Contra los dogmáticos. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesMCKIRAHAN, RICHARD (2010) Philosophy Before Socrates. IndianapolisCambridge: Hackett.
dc.relation.referencesMEERWALDT, J. D. (1951) “Cleanthea I”. En: Mnemosyne Fourth Series, Vol. 4, Fasc. 1 (1951), pp. 40-69.
dc.relation.referencesMEERWALDT, J. D. [ED.] (1914) Corpus medicorum graecorum, vol. 5.9.1. Galeni in Hippocratis de natura hominis commentaria tria. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesMEINEKE, A. [ED.] (1969 [1877]) Strabonis geographica, 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesMELERO, ANTONIO [TRAD.] (1996) Sofistas: testimonios y fragmentos. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesMENN, STEPHEN (2002) “Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima”. En: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXII, Summer 2002, pp.83-139.
dc.relation.referencesMÉRIDIER, LOUIS (1961) [ED. & TRAD.] Platon: Oeuvres Complètes, tome V: Cratyle. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesMIGLIORE, MAURIZIO [TRAD. & COMM.] (1976) Aristotele: La generazione e la corruzione. Napoli: Luigi Loffredo Editore.
dc.relation.referencesMIRHADY, DAVID (2001) “Dicearchus of Messana: The Sources, Text and Translation”. En: FORTENBAUGH & SCHÜTRUMPF (2001) Dicearchus of Messana, pp. 1-142.
dc.relation.referencesMODRAK, DEBORAH (2002) “Phantasia, Thought and Science in Eudemus”. En: BODNÁR & FORTENBAUGH (2002) Eudemus of Rhodes, pp. 191-206.
dc.relation.referencesMONDÉSERT, C. [ED.] (1949) Clément d'Alexandrie. Le protreptique. Paris: Cerf.
dc.relation.referencesMONDOLFO, RODOLFO [TRAD. & EST.] (1966) Heráclito: textos y problemas de su interpretación. Traducción de Oberdan Caletti. México: Siglo XXI editores.
dc.relation.references__________ (s.d) Le testimonianze di Aristotele su Eraclito. Torino: Edizioni di «Filosofia».
dc.relation.referencesMONDOLFO, R. & TARÁN, L. [EDS.] (1972) Eraclito: testimonianze e imitazioni. Firenze; La nuova Italia.
dc.relation.referencesMONDOLFO, R.; TARÁN, L. & MARCOVICH, M. [EDS.] (2007) Eraclito: testimonianze, imitazioni e frammenti. Milano: Bompiani.
dc.relation.referencesMORAUX, PAUL (2000) L’aristotelismo presso i Greci, volume primo: La rinascita dell’Aristotelismo nel I secolo a. C. Trad. de Stefano Tognoli. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
dc.relation.references__________ (1978) “Le De Anima dans la tradition grecque. Quelques aspects de l’interprétation du traité, de Théophraste à Thémistius”. En: LLOYD & OWEN (1978) Aristotle on Mind and the Senses, pp. 281-324.
dc.relation.references__________ (1968) “La joute dialectique d’après le huitième libre des Topiques”. En: OWEN (1968) Aristotle on Dialectic, pp. 277-311
dc.relation.references__________ (1951) Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’Aristote. Louvain: Éditions universitaires de Louvain.
dc.relation.referencesMORAUX, PAUL [ED.] (1971-88) Peripatoi: Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesMOREAU, JOSEPH (1961) “Aristote et la vérité antéprédicative”. En: S. MANSION (1961) Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, pp. 21-33.
dc.relation.referencesMOREL, PIERRE-MARIE (1996) Démocrite et la recherche des causes. Langres –Saint-Geosmes: Klincksieck.
dc.relation.referencesMOURAVIEV, SERGEI [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (2008) Heraclitea III.2. Recensio: Placita. Sankt Agustin: Academia Verlag.
dc.relation.references__________ (2006a ) Heraclitea III.3.B/i. Recensio: Fragmenta. Sankt Agustin: Academia Verlag.
dc.relation.references__________ (2006b ) Heraclitea III.3.B/ii. Recensio: Fragmenta. Sankt Agustin: Academia Verlag.
dc.relation.references__________ (2006c ) Heraclitea III.3.B/iii. Recensio: Fragmenta. Sankt Agustin: Academia Verlag.
dc.relation.references__________ (1999) Heraclitea II.A.1. Traditio (A). Sankt Agustin: Academia Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesMRAS, K. [ED.] (1956) Eusebius Werke, Band 8: Die Praeparatio evangelica. Berlin: Akademie–Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesMUGLER, C. [ED. & TRAD.] (1966) Aristote: De la génération et de la corruption”. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesMUTSCHMANN, H. & MAU, J. [EDS.] (1961) Sexti Empirici opera, vol. 3. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesNAILS, DEBRA (2002) The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and other Socratics. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett.
dc.relation.referencesNUSSBAUM, MARTHA (1995) “Introduction”. En: NUSSBAUM & OKSENBERGRORTY (1995) Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, pp. 5-17.
dc.relation.referencesNUSSBAUM, M. & OKSENBERG-RORTY, A. [EDS.] (1995) Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesNUYENS, FRANÇOIS (1948 [1939]) L’évolution de la psychologie d’Aristote. Lovain: Institut supérieur de Philosophie.
dc.relation.referencesO’BRIEN, DENIS (1984) “Théories atomistes de la vision: Démocrite et le problème de la fourmi céleste”. En: BENAKIS (1984) Proceedings of the First International Congress on Democritus, pp. 27-58.
dc.relation.references__________ (1981a ) Democritus Weight and Size: An Exercise in the Reconstruction of Early Greek Philosophy. Paris-Leiden: Les Belles Lettres-Brill.
dc.relation.references__________ (1981b ) Pour interpréter Empédocle. Paris-Leiden: Les Belles Lettres-Brill.
dc.relation.references__________ (1969) Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle: a reconstruction from the fragments and secondary sources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesO’MEARA, D. [ED.] (1982) Neoplatonism and Christian Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.
dc.relation.referencesOSBORNE, CATHERINE (1987) Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. New York: Cornell University Press.
dc.relation.referencesOWEN, G. E. L. (1966) “The Platonism of Aristotle”. En: Proceedings of the British Academy Vol. LI 1965, pp. 125-150.
dc.relation.references__________ (1961) “Τιθέναι τὰ φαινόμενα”. En: MANSION [ED.] (1961) Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, pp. 83-103.
dc.relation.referencesOWEN, G. E. L. [ED.] (1968) Aristotle on Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesPABÓN, JOSÉ [TRAD.] (1982) Homero: Odisea. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesPACIUS, JULIUS [ED. & TRAD.] (1596) Aristotelis De Anima Libri tres. Francfourti: Aubrios & Schleichium.
dc.relation.referencesPALLI, JULIO [TRAD.] (1992) Aristóteles: Investigación sobre los animales. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesPALMER, R. & HAMERTON-KELLY, R. (1971) Philomates: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
dc.relation.referencesPEPE, LUCIO (1996) La misura e l’equivalenza: la fisica di Anassagora. Napoli: Loffredo Editore.
dc.relation.referencesPERRIN, B. [ED.] (1968 [1916]) Plutarch's lives, vol. 4. Cambridge (MS): Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPFEIFFER, RUDOLF (1969) History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesPLATT, ARTHUR [TRAD.] (1910) De Generatione Animalium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesPLEZIA, MARIANUS (1961) Aristotelis epistularum fragmenta cum testamento. Varsoviae: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
dc.relation.referencesPOLANSKY, RONALD (2007) Aristotle’s De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPORATTI, A.; EGGERS, C.; SANTA-CRUZ, M. & CORDERO, N. [TRADS.] (1980) Los filósofos presocráticos III. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesPRIZL, KURT (1994) “Opinions as Appearances: Endoxa in Aristotle”. En: Ancient Philosophy 14.
dc.relation.referencesRADT, STEFAN [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (2005) Strabons Geographika, Band 3, Buch IX-XIII: Text und Übersetzung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
dc.relation.referencesRASHED, MARWAN [ED. & TRAD.] (2005) Aristote: De la géneration et la corruption. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesRAVAISSON, FÉLIX (2007) Essai sur la “Métaphysique” d’Aristote. Paris: du Cerf.
dc.relation.referencesREES, D. A. (1960) “Theories of the Soul in the early Aristotle”. En: DÜRING & OWEN (1960) Aristotle and Plato in the mi-fourth Century, pp. 191-200.
dc.relation.referencesREESOR, MARGARET (1972) “The Problem of Anaxagoras”. En: ANTON & KUSTAS (1972) Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, pp, 81-87.
dc.relation.referencesREINHARDT, KARL (1916) Parmenides und die Geschichte der Griechischen Philosophie. Bonn: Friedrich Cohen.
dc.relation.referencesREPICI, LUCIANA (1988) La natura e l’anima saggi su Stratone di Lampsaco. Torino: Tirrenia Stampatori.
dc.relation.referencesRIJKSBARON, ALBERTUS (1976) Temporal & Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: Adolf Hakkert.
dc.relation.referencesRIPASARDA, C. [ED. & TRAD.] (1991) Censorinus: De Die Natali Liber. Bologne: Patron.
dc.relation.referencesROBIN, LEON (1944) Aristote. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
dc.relation.referencesRODIER, G. (1890) La Physique de Straton de Lampsaque. Paris: Félix Alcan.
dc.relation.referencesRODIER, G. [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1900a ) Aristote: Traité de l’âme. Tome I: texte et traduction. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
dc.relation.references__________ (1900b ) Aristote: Traité de l’âme. Tome II: notes. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
dc.relation.referencesRODRÍGUEZ-NORIEGA, LUCÍA [TRAD.] (1998b ) Ateneo: Banquete de los eruditos, libros III-V. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.references__________ (1998a ) Ateneo: Banquete de los eruditos, libros I-II. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesROMEYER DHERBEY, GILBERT (1983) Les choses mêmes: la pensé du réel chez Aristote. Laussane; L’Âge du Homme.
dc.relation.referencesROMEYER DHERBEY G. & VIANO, C. [EDS.] (1996) Corps et âme: sur le De Anima d’Aristote. Paris: Vrin.
dc.relation.referencesROSE, VALENTIN (1863) Aristoteles Pseudoepigraphus. Lipsiae: Teubneri.
dc.relation.references__________ (1854) De Aristotelis librorum ordine et auctoritate: commentatio. Berolini: Reimeri.
dc.relation.referencesROSENFELD-LÖFFLER, ANNETTE (2006) La poétique d’Empédocle: cosmologie et métaphore. Bern: Peter Lang.
dc.relation.referencesROSS, W. DAVID (1958) “The Development of Aristotle’s Thought (Dawes Hicks Lecture on Philosophy)”. En: Proceedings of the British Academy 1957, pp. 63-78. - Reimpreso en DÜRING & OWEN (1960) Aristotle and Plato in the mi-fourth Century, pp. 1-17.’
dc.relation.references__________ (1923) Aristotle. London: Methuen & Co.
dc.relation.referencesROSS, W. D. [ED.] (1970a [1958]) Aristotelis topica et sophistici elenchi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1970b ) Aristotle: Parva naturalia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1968 [1964]) Aristotelis analytica priora et posteriora. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1966 [1950]) Aristotelis physica. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1964) Aristotelis politica. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesROSS, W. D. [ED. & COMM.] (1970 [1924]) Aristotle's metaphysics, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1967 [1961]) Aristotle. De anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesSALEM, JEAN (2007) “Perception et connaissance chez Démocrite”. En: BRANCACCI & MOREL (2007) Democritus, pp. 125-142.
dc.relation.referencesSÁNCHEZ, E. & ALONSO, A. [TRADS.] (2000) Aristóteles: Partes de los animales; Marcha de los animales; Movimiento de los animales. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesSÁNCHEZ, ESTHER [TRAD.] (2004) Aristóteles: Problemas. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.references__________ (1994) Aristóteles: Reproducción de los animales. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesSÁNCHEZ, LILIANA CAROLINA (2012) “La filosofía heraclítea interpretada por Platón”. En: Ideas y Valores, vol. LXI, No. 150 (Dic. 2012), pp. 229-244.
dc.relation.references__________ (2011) “La lectura contextual: metodología para la lectura de fragmentos de los filósofos presocráticos aplicada a la tradición interpretativa platónica sobre Heráclito”. En: Pensamiento y Cultura, vol. 14 No. 2 (Dic. 2011), pp. 133-144.
dc.relation.references__________ (2009) La tradición interpretativa platónica sobre Heráclito: El Cratilo y la doctrina del flujo perpetuo. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia (http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/2628/)
dc.relation.referencesSANDYS, JOHN (1906) A History of Classical Scholarship: from the sixth century B. C. to the end of the middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSANTA CRUZ, M.; VALLEJO, A. & CORDERO, N. [TRADS.] (1988) Platón: Diálogos V. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesSCHAUBACH, EDUARDO (1827) Anaxagorae Clazomenii Fragmenta. Lipsiae: Sumptibus Hartmann.
dc.relation.referencesSCHMITT, CHARLES B. (1971) “Theophrastus”. En: KRISTELLER & CRANZ (1971) Catalogus Translationum et Commentatorium II, pp. 239-322.
dc.relation.referencesSCHNEIDER, C. E. CHR. [ED.] (1847) Procli commentarius in Platonis Timaeum. Vratislaviae: Eduardus Trewendt.
dc.relation.referencesSCHOFIELD, MALCOLM (1980) An essay on Anaxagoras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSCHWEGLER, ALBERT [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1847) Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Tübingen, Druck und Verlag von L. Fr. Fues.
dc.relation.referencesSEDLEY, DAVID (2003) Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references__________ (1992) “ ‘Empedocles’ Theory of Vision and Theophrastus’ De Sensibus’. En: FORTENBAUGH & GUTAS (1992) Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific, pp. 20-31.
dc.relation.referencesSEIDL, HORST [TRAD. & COMM.] (1995) Aristoteles: Über die Seele. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesSHARPLES, ROBERT (2007a ) “Aristotle’s exoteric works: summaries and commentaries”. En: SHARPLES & SORABJI (2007) Greek and Roman Philosophy 100BC- 200BC, pp. 505-512.
dc.relation.references__________ (2007b ) “Peripatetics on Soul and Intellect”. EN: SHARPLES & SORABJI (2007) Greek and Roman Philosophy 100BC- 200BC, pp. 505-512.
dc.relation.references__________ (2006) “Common to Body and Soul: Peripatetic Approaches after Aristotle”. En: KING (2006) Common to Body and Soul, pp. 165-186.
dc.relation.references__________ (2004a ) “Alexander of Aphrodisias: what is a Mantissa?”. En: ADAMSON, BALTUSSEN & STONE (2004) Philosophy, Science and Exegesis, pp. 51- 69.
dc.relation.references__________ (2002) “Eudemus’ Physics: Change, Place and Time”. En: BODNÁR & FORTENBAUGH (2002) Eudemus of Rhodes, pp. 107-126.
dc.relation.references__________ (1990) “The school of Alexander?”. En: SORABJI (1990) Aristotle Transformed, pp. 83-111.
dc.relation.referencesSHARPLES, R. & SORABJI, R. [ED.] (2007) Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 94: Greek and Roman Philosophy 100BC- 200BC. London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of London.
dc.relation.referencesSHARPLES, R. W. [TRAD.] (2004b ) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement On the Soul. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesSHOREY, PAUL (1914) “Note on Aristotle’s De Anima 405ª3”. En: Classical Philology Vol. 9, No. 3 (July 1914), pp. 316-317.
dc.relation.referencesSIDER, DAVID [ED., TRAD. & COMM] (2005 [1981]) The Fragments of Anaxagoras. Academia Verlag: Sankt Agustin.
dc.relation.referencesSILVESTRE, MARIA LUISA (1989) Anassagora nella storiografia filosofica: Dal V sec. a. C. al VI sec. d. C. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
dc.relation.referencesSIM, MAY [ED.] (1999) From Puzzles to Principles: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic. Lanham/New York: Lexington Books.
dc.relation.referencesSIWEK, PAUL (1965) Le “De Anima” d’Aristote dans les manuscrits grecs. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.
dc.relation.referencesSKEMP, J. B. (1942) The Theory of Motion in Plato’s Later Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSMITH, J. A. & ROSS, W. D. [EDS. & TRADS.] (1908) The Works of Aristotle, vol. VIII Metaphysica. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesSMITH, ROBIN (1999) “Dialectic and Method in Aristotle”. En: SIM (1999) From Puzzles to Principles?, pp. 39-55.
dc.relation.references__________ (1993) “Aristotle on the uses of Dialectic”. En: Sythese 96 No. 3, pp. 335-358.
dc.relation.referencesSMITH, R. [TRAD. & COMM.] (1997) Aristotle Topics I and VIII. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesSMYTH, HERBERT WEIR (1958) Greek Grammar. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSOLANA, JOSÉ [TRAD.] (1989) Teofrasto: Sobre las sensaciones. Barcelona: Anthropos.
dc.relation.referencesSORABJI, RICHARD (1990) “The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle”. En: SORABJI (1990) Aristotle Transformed, pp. 1-30.
dc.relation.referencesSORABJI, R. [ED.] (1990) Aristotle Transformed: the Ancient Commentators and their Influence. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesSTAHR, ADOLF (1834) Aristoteles bei den Roemern. Leipzig: August Lehnhold.
dc.relation.references__________ (1832) Aristotelia II. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
dc.relation.references__________ (1830) Aristotelia I. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.
dc.relation.referencesSTALLBAUM, GODFRIED [ED. & COMM.] (1832) Platonis: dialogos selectos, vol. IV. Erfodiae: Hennings & Hopf.
dc.relation.referencesSTÜVE, G. [ED.] (1900) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XII: Olympiodori in Aristotelis meteora commentaria. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesTAYLOR, C. C. W. (2005 [1999]) The Routledge History of Philosophy I: From the Beginning to Plato. London- New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesTAYLOR, C. C. W. [TRAD. & COMM.] (1999) The Atomist Leucippus and Democritus: Fragments. A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
dc.relation.referencesTEODORSSON, SVEN-TAGE (1982) Anaxagoras’ Theory of Matter. Gotheborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
dc.relation.referencesTHUROT, CHARLES (1860) Études sur Aristote: politique, dialectique, rhétorique. Paris: Durand.
dc.relation.referencesTIELEMAN, TEUN (2002) “Galen’s Psychology”. En: BARNES & JOUANNA (2002) Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique XLIX, pp. 131-169.
dc.relation.referencesTIMPANARO, MARIA [ED. & TRAD.] (1964) Pitagorici: testimonianze e frammenti, fascicolo terzo (Pitagorici anonimi e risonanze pitagoriche). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
dc.relation.references__________ (1962) Pitagorici: testimonianza e frammenti, fascicolo terzo (Ippocrate di Chio, Filolao, Archita e Pitagorici minori). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
dc.relation.references__________ (1958) Pitagorici: testimonianze e frammenti, fascicolo primo (Pitagora, Cercope, Petrone, Brotino, Ippaso, Callifonte e Democede, Parmenisco, Alcmeone, Icco, Parone, Aminia, Menestore, Xuto). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
dc.relation.referencesTODD, ROBERT (2003) “Themistius”. En: BROWN, HANKINS & KASTER (2003) Catalogus Translationum et Commentatorium VIII, pp. 57-102.
dc.relation.referencesTODD, R. [TRAD.] (1996) Themistius. On Aristotle. On the Soul. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesTORSTRIK, ADOLFUS [ED. & COMM.] (1862) Aristotelis de anima libri III. Berolini: Apud Weidmannos.
dc.relation.referencesTOWEY, ALAN [TRAD.] (2000) Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle, On Sense Perception. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesTRENDELENBURG, FRIDERICH ADOLPH [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1833) Aristotelis de anima libri tres. Ienae: Sumtibus Walzii.
dc.relation.referencesTRICOT, J. [TRAD.] (2004) Aristote: Topiques, Organon V. Paris: vrin.
dc.relation.references__________ (1953) Aristote: La Métaphysique Tome I. Paris: Vrin.
dc.relation.references__________ (1947) Aristote: De l’âme. Paris: Vrin.
dc.relation.referencesURMSON, J. O. [TRAD.] (1995) Simplicius. On Aristotle. On the Soul 1.1-2.4 (Notes by Peter Lautner). London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesVALLEJO, ÁLVARO [TRAD.] (2005) Aristóteles: Fragmentos. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesVAN DER EIJK, PHILIP J. [ED.] (1999) Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesVAN DER EIJK, PHILIP J. [TRAD.] (2006) Philoponus. On Aristotle. On the Soul 1.3-5. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.references__________ (2005) Philoponus. On Aristotle. On the soul 1.1.2. London: Duckworth.
dc.relation.referencesVERBEKE, G. [ED. & EST.] (1966) Jean Philopon. Commentaire sur le De Anima d’Aristote. (Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke). Louvain: Publications universitaires de Louvain.
dc.relation.references__________ (1957) Thémistius. Commentaire sur le traité de l’âme d’Aristote (Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke). Louvain: Publications universitaires de Louvain.
dc.relation.referencesVIANO, CRISTINA (1996) “La doxographie du De Anima (I, 2-5) ou le contremodèle de l’âme”. En: ROMEYER & VIANO (1996) Corps et âme, pp. 51-80.
dc.relation.referencesVLASTOS, GREGORY (1955) “On Heraclitus”. En: The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 337-368.
dc.relation.referencesVON ARNIM, J. [ED.] ([1903] 1968a ) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, vol. 2. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.references__________ ([1905] 1968b ) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, vol. 1”. Leipzig: Teubner.
dc.relation.referencesVON DER MÜHLL, P. [ED.] (1962) Homeri Odyssea. Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
dc.relation.referencesWACHSMUTH, C. & HENSE, O. [ED.] (1958) Ioannis Stobaei anthologium, 5 vols.” Berlin: Weidmann.
dc.relation.referencesALZER, RICARDUS [TRAD.] (1964 [1939]) Eraclito. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.
dc.relation.referencesWEHRLI, FRITZ [ED. & COMM.] (1969a ) Die Schule des Aristoteles, Heft V: Straton von Lampsakos. Basel-Stuttgart: Schwabe & Co.
dc.relation.references__________ (1969b ) Die Schule des Aristoteles, Heft VIII: Eudemos von Rhodos. Basel-Stuttgart: Schwabe & Co.
dc.relation.references__________ (1969c ) Die Schule des Aristoteles, Heft X: Hieronymos von Rhodos, Kritolaos und seine Schüler. Basel-Stuttgart: Schwabe & Co.
dc.relation.references__________ (1967) Die Schule des Aristoteles, Heft I: Dikaiarchos. BaselStuttgart: Schwabe & Co.
dc.relation.referencesWEIL, ERIC (1991) Essais et conférences, Tome 1: Philosophie. Paris: Libraire philosophique J. Vrin.
dc.relation.references__________ “La place de la logique dans la pensée aristotélicienne”. En: WEIL, E. (1991) Essais et conférences, pp. 44-80.
dc.relation.referencesWELLIVER, WARMAN (1977) Character, Plot and Thought in Plato’s Timaeus-Critias. Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesWENDLAND, P. [ED.] (1901) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca III: Alexandri in librum de sensu commentarium. Berlin: Reimer.
dc.relation.referencesWIESNER, JÜRGEN [ED.] (1987) Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesWIANS, W. [ED.] (1995) Aristotle's Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
dc.relation.referencesWILAMOWITZ-MOELLENDORFF, U. (1927) “Lesefrüchte”. En: Hermes 62, H. 3 (July 1927), pp. 276-298.
dc.relation.referencesWILLIAMS, BERNARD (1986) “Hylomorphism”. En: WOODS (1986) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy IV, pp. 189-200.
dc.relation.referencesWILLIAMS, C. J. F. [TRAD. & COMM.] (1982) Aristotle´s De Generatione et Corruptione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesWINDELBAND, WILHEM (1901) A History of Philosophy: the Formation and Development of its Problems and Conceptions. Traducción de James Tufts. New York: Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesWLODARCZYK, MARTA (2000) “Aristotelian Dialectic and the Discovery of Thruth”. En: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XVIII, pp. 153-210.
dc.relation.referencesWÖHRLE, GEORG [ED.] (2009) Die Milesier: Thales. Berlin: De Gruyter.
dc.relation.referencesWOLSKA-CONUS, WANDA (1989) “Stéphanos d’Athènes et Stéphanos d’Alexandrie. Essai d’identification et de biographie”. En: Revue des Études Byzantines 47, 5-89.
dc.relation.referencesWOODS, MICHAEL [ED.] (1986) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
dc.relation.referencesWRIGHT, M. R. [ED., TRAD. & COMM.] (1981) Empedocles: the Extant Fragments. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesZAFIROPULO, JEAN (1948) Anaxagore de Clazomène. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
dc.relation.referencesZANATTA, MARCELLO [TRAD. & COMM.] (2006) Aristotele L’Anima. Roma: Aracne.
dc.relation.referencesZARAGOZA, J. & GÓMEZ, P. [TRAD.] (1992) Platón: Diálogos VIII. Madrid: Gredos.
dc.relation.referencesZELLER, EDUARD (1879) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag.
dc.relation.referencesZELLER, E. & MONDOLFO, R. (1966 [1921]) La filosofia dei greci nel suo sviluppo storico, parte seconda, vol. VI: Aristotele. Firenza: La Nuova Italia.
dc.relation.referencespo storico, parte seconda, vol. VI: Aristotele. Firenza: La Nuova Italia. • __________ (1961 [1923]) La filosofia dei greci nel suo sviluppo storico, parte prima: presocratici, vol. IV: Eraclito. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
dc.relation.referencesZHMUD, LEONID (2002) “Eudemus’ History of Mathematics”. En: BODNÁR & FORTENBAUGH (2002) Eudemus of Rhodes, pp. 263-306.
dc.relation.referencesZINGANO, MARCO (2007) “Aristotle and the Problem of Method in Ethics”. En: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXII, pp. 297-330.
dc.relation.referencesZÜRCHER, JOSEF (1952) Aristoteles’ Werk und Geist. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc180 - Filosofía antigua , medieval, oriental
dc.subject.lembALMAspa
dc.subject.lembSouleng
dc.subject.lembDIALECTICA-ENSAYOS, CONFERENCIAS, ETC.spa
dc.subject.lembDialectics - addresses, essays, lectureseng
dc.subject.lembTRADICION (FILOSOFIA)spa
dc.subject.lembTradition (Philosophy)eng
dc.subject.lembFILOSOFIA ANTIGUA-OBRAS ANTERIORES A 1800spa
dc.subject.lembPhilosophy, ancient - early works to 1800eng
dc.subject.proposalAristótelesspa
dc.subject.proposalFilósofos presocráticosspa
dc.subject.proposalAlmaspa
dc.subject.proposalDialécticaspa
dc.subject.proposalAristotleeng
dc.subject.proposalPre-Socratic philosopherseng
dc.subject.proposalSouleng
dc.subject.proposalDialecticeng
dc.titleTraditio Animae : la interpretación aristotélica de las doctrinas presocráticas sobre el almaspa
dc.title.translatedTraditio Animae : the Aristotelian reception of the presocratic theories on the souleng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentInvestigadores
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestros
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico general
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.fundernameCOLCIENCIAS

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tesis Biblioteca.pdf
Tamaño:
2.26 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Filosofía

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
5.74 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: