La teoría económica y el modelo de perspectiva conductual: una aproximación experimental al efecto de los ingresos y precios sobre la elección del consumidor

dc.contributor.advisorClavijo Álvarez, Álvaro Arturo
dc.contributor.authorPico Bonilla, Claudia Milena
dc.contributor.researchgroupAprendizaje y Comportamiento Animalspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T15:03:58Z
dc.date.available2021-08-26T15:03:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-25
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficas, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractEste trabajo parte de la formulación del modelo de perspectiva conductual y construye un análisis de las versiones teóricas en economía sobre el comportamiento del consumidor. En particular, se oponen la versión neoclásica y postkeynesiana en relación con el efecto del precio y el ingreso sobre el comportamiento de los compradores y las explicaciones neoclásica y comportamental sobre la elección intertemporal. Para examinar el debate teórico, se realizó un ejercicio de simulación de una tarea de compras con las siguientes características: productos homogéneos e información sobre precio y cantidades de producto. El entorno de compra fue cerrado y se ejecutó durante seis períodos en los que se modificaron los programas de razón y el ingreso disponible para los participantes. Se construyó un panel de 214 consumidores para un repertorio de 46 productos. En el procesamiento de información se encontró que las versiones comportamental y postkeynesiana de la teoría del consumidor explican los patrones de elección observados y que únicamente en circunstancias en las que el precio es el atributo más saliente, es posible inferir una respuesta al mismo. Además, fue posible comprobar que las predicciones de la teoría neoclásica se confirman en los patrones de elección de cerca del 15% de los participantes. (Texto tomado de la fuente)spa
dc.description.abstractThis work is based on the behavioral perspective model and builds a comparative analysis between theoretical versions of consumer behavior in economics. In particular, the document compares the neoclassical and post-Keynesian version in relation to the effect of price and income on purchases and the neoclassical and behavioral explanations on intertemporal choice. To examine the theoretical debate in detail, we develop a simulation exercise of a shopping task in which the consumer's situation had the following characteristics: homogeneous products and information on prices and amounts of products. The purchasing environment was closed and was performed during six periods with variations on the ratio schedule programs and, on the income. We build a consumer panel from the simulation with 214 participants for a repertoire of 46 products. It was found that the behavioral and post-Keynesian versions of consumer theory explain the observed patterns of choice and, only in circumstances in which price is the most salient attribute of the consumer's situation, is it possible to infer a price response. In addition, it was found that the predictions of neoclassical theory are confirmed in the choice patterns of about 15% of the participants.eng
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Psicologíaspa
dc.description.researchareaElección y decisiónspa
dc.format.extentXII, 112 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80026
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Psicologíaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Doctorado en Psicologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesAggarwal, P., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2003). Eliciting online customers’ preferences: Conjoint vs. self-explicated attribute-level measurements. Journal of Marketing Management, 19, 157-177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2003.9728205spa
dc.relation.referencesAllison, J. (1983). Behavioral economics. New York: Praeger.spa
dc.relation.referencesAutor, D. (2004). Demand Functions, Income Effects and Substitution Effects: Theory and Evidence. Recuperado el 11 de Agosto de 2020, de https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/71009/14-03-fall-2004/contents/lecture-notes/lecture6.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesAutor, D. (2004). Lecture 4 - Theory of Choice and Individual Demand. Recuperado el 11 de Agosto de 2020, de http://www2.myoops.org/twocw/mit/NR/rdonlyres/Economics/14-03Fall-2004/307CCFDF-4D49-4885-AF45-6C1B4D81DF76/0/lecture4.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesBlaug, M. (2001). Teoría económica en retrospección. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Barreiros, R., Oliveira-Castro, J., & Seco-Ferreira, D. (2011). What consumers say and do: planned and actual amounts bought in relation to brand benefits. The service industry journal, 31(15), 2559–2570. doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.529607spa
dc.relation.referencesBettman, J. (1971). A graph theory approach to comparing consumer information processing models. Management science, 18(4), 114-128.spa
dc.relation.referencesBreugelmans, E., Campo, K., & Gijsbrechts, E. (2006). Opportunities for active stock-out management in online stores: The impact of the stock-out policy on online stockout reactions. Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 215-228.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrida, J., Santiñaque, F., & Lanzilotta, B. (2017). Modelos basados en grafos: una aplicación al estudio de caso de cruceristas en Uruguay. Revista métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa, 24, 270-291.spa
dc.relation.referencesBruni, L. (2010). Paretos legacy in modern economics: the case of psychology. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 48(146), 93-111.spa
dc.relation.referencesBruni, L. (2013). The Paretian turn. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 51(2), 47-64. Chen, J., & Dibb, S. (2010). Consumer trust in the online retail context: exploring the antecedents and consequences. Psychology and marketing, 27(4), 323-346. doi:10.1002/mar.20334spa
dc.relation.referencesCollander, D. (2000). The death of neoclassical economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), 127-143.spa
dc.relation.referencesCowart, K., & Goldsmith, R. (2007). The influence of consumer decision-making styles on online apparel consumption by college students. International Journal of consumer studies, 31, 639-647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00615.xspa
dc.relation.referencesCrespo, R. (2017). Economics and other disciplines: assessing new economics currents. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesCuevas, H. (2007). Teorías económicas de mercado. Segunda edición. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesDANE. (2019). Clasificación provisional de subclases de gasto. Recuperado el 04 de Abril de 2020, de https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/precios-y-costos/indice-de-precios-al-consumidor-ipc/ipc-canastas-especialesspa
dc.relation.referencesDarley, W., Blankson, C., & Luethge, D. (2010). Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: A review. Psychology and marketing, 27(2), 94-116. doi:10.1002/mar.20322spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Vries, N., Arefin, A., & Moscato, P. (2014). Gauging Heterogeneity in Online Consumer Behaviour Data: A Proximity Graph Approach. IEEE Fourth International Conference on Big Data and Cloud Computing, 485-492.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeaton, A. (2015). Consumption, great and small. Recuperado el 09 de 04 de 2020, de https://www.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/docs/koenig-pamina/prix-nobel_economicsciences2015.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesDeaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrakopoulos, S. (1990). The implicit psychology of the theory of the rational consumer: an interpretation. Australian Economic Papers, 29(55), 182-198. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.1990.tb00517.xspa
dc.relation.referencesDrolet, A., & Luce, M. (2004). Cognitive load and trade-off avoidance. Journal of consumer research, 31(1), 63-77. doi:10.1086/383424 Ehrenberg, A., & Goodhart, G. (1970). A Model of Multi-Brand Buying. Journal of marketing research, 7(1), 77-84. doi:10.1177/002224377000700109spa
dc.relation.referencesEscartin, E. (s.f.). El marginalismo: Jevons. Recuperado el 04 de 02 de 2021, de https://personal.us.es/escartin/Jevons_Marginalismo.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFagerstrøm, A. (2010). The Motivating Effect of Antecedent Stimuli on the Web Shop: A Conjoint Analysis of the Impact of Antecedent Stimuli at the Point of Online Purchase. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(2), 199-220. doi:10.1080/01608061003756562 Fagerstrøm, A., & Artnzen, E. (2013). On motivating operations at the point of online purchase setting. The psychological record, 63, 333-344.spa
dc.relation.referencesFagerstrøm, A., & Ghinea, G. (2011). On the motivating impact of price and online recommendations at the point of online purchase. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 103-110. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.013spa
dc.relation.referencesFagerstrøm, A., & Hantula, D. (2013). Buy it now and pay for it later: an experimental study of student credit card use. The Psychological record, 63, 323-332. doi:10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.2.007spa
dc.relation.referencesFagerstrom, A., & Sigurdsson, V. (2016). Experimental analyses of consumer choices. En G. Foxall, The Routledge companion to consumer behavior analysis (págs. 25-38). New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFagerstrøm, A., Arntzen, E., & Foxall, G. (2011). A study of preferences in a simulated online shopping experiment. Service Industries Journal, 31(15), 2603-2615. doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.531121spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (1992). The Behavioral Perspective Model of purchase and consumption: from consumer theory to marketing practice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 189-198. doi:10.1007/BF02723458spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (1993). A behaviourist perspective on purchase and consumption. European Journal of Maketing, 27(8), 7-16. doi:10.1108/03090569310042891spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (1997). Marketing Psychology. New York: Palgrave.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (1999). The contextual stance. Philosophical Psychology, 12(1), 25-46. doi:10.1080/095150899105918spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2004). Consumer psychology in behavioural perspective. London: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2005). Understanding Consumer Choice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2007). Explaining consumer choice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2010a). Interpreting consmer choice: the behavioral perspective model. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2010b). Accounting for consumer choice: intertemporal decision making in behavioral perspective. Marketing theory, 10(4), 315-345.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2015). Consumer behavior: a practical guide. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2016a). Operant Behavioral Economics. Managerial and decision economics, 37, 215–223. doi:10.1002/mde.2712spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2016b). The Routledge companion to consumer behavior analysis. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. (2017). Behavioral economics in consumer behavior analysis. Behavior Analyst, 40, 309-313. doi:10.1007/s40614-017-0127-4spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G. R., & James, V. K. (2001). The behavioral basis of consumer choice: A preliminary analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2(92), 209-220.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G., & James, V. K. (2003). The behavioral ecology of brand choice: How and what do consumers maximize? Psychology & Marketing, 20, 811-836. doi:10.1002/mar.10098spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G., & Schrezenmaier, T. (2003). The behavioral economics of consumer brand choice: Establishing a methodology. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 675-695. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00008-4spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G., Oliveira-Castro, J., & Schrezenmaier, T. (2004). The behavioral economics of consumer brand choice: Patterns of reinforcement and utility maximization. Behavioral Processes, 66(3), 235-260.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G., Oliveira-Castro, J., James, V., & Schrezenmaier, T. (2011). Consumer behaviour analysis and the behavioural perspective model. Management Online Review (MORE), 1-9. Obtenido de http://www.morexpertise.com/view.php?id=70spa
dc.relation.referencesFoxall, G., Wells, V., Chang, S., & Oliveira-Castro, J. (2010). Substitutability and Independence: Matching Analyses of Brands and Products. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30, 145–160. doi:10.1080/01608061003756414spa
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrølich, E., & Sandaker, I. (2017). Contributions of Behavior Analysis to behavioral economics. The Behavior Analyst, 40, 315-327. doi:10.1007/s40614-017-0110-0spa
dc.relation.referencesGalbraith, J. (1998). The affluent society. Boston: Mariner Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarbarino, E., & Strahilevits, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived role of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00363-6spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, A. (2001). Las leyes ceteris paribus y la inexactitud de la economía. Teorema, 20(3), 69-80.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, F., & Isaac, A. (2002). The behavioral life-cycle theory of consumer behavior: survey evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(4), 391-401. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00242-6spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen, L., Fry, A., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5(1), 33-36.spa
dc.relation.referencesHands, W. (2010). Economics, psychology and the history of consumer choice theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(4), 633-648. doi: 10.1093/cje/bep045spa
dc.relation.referencesHayakawa, H. (1978). Laxicographic preferences and consumer theory. Journal of behavioral economics, 7(1), 17-51. doi:10.1016/0090-5720(78)90013-Xspa
dc.relation.referencesHerrnstein, R. (1961). Relative and absolute strenght of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 4(3), 267-272.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, Z., Zeng, D., & Chen, H. (2007). Analyzing Consumer-Product Graphs: Empirical Findings and Applications in Recommender Systems. Management Science, 53(7), 1146-1164. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0619spa
dc.relation.referencesHursh, S., & Roma, P. (2015). Behavioral Economics and the Analysis of Consumption and Choice. Managerial and decision economics, 37, 224-238. doi: 10.1002/mde.2724spa
dc.relation.referencesHuynh, N., Foxall, G. (2016). Consumer store choice: a matching analysis. En G. Foxall, The Routledge Companion to Consumer Behavior Analysis (págs. 96-120). New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesJevons, S. (1888). The theory of political economy. New York: Macmillan & Co.spa
dc.relation.referencesKahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Maps of Bounded Rationality. Recuperado el 13 de Agosto de 2020, de http://houdekpetr.cz/%21data/public_html/papers/Kahnem%202003.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesKoehler, D., Langstaff, J., & Liu, W.-Q. (2015). A simulated financial savings task for studying consumption and retirement decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 46, 89-97. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.004spa
dc.relation.referencesKohli, R., & Jedidi, K. (2007). Representation and Inference of Lexicographic Preference Models and Their Variants. Marketing Science, 26(3), 380-399.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhlmeier, D., & Knight, G. (2005). Antecedents to Internet-based purchasing: A multinational study. International Marketing Review, 22(4), 460-473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330510608460spa
dc.relation.referencesLancaster, K. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157.spa
dc.relation.referencesLavoie, M. (1994). A Post Keynesian Approach to Consumer Choice. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 16(4), 539-562.spa
dc.relation.referencesLavoie, M. (2003). Consumer theory. En J. King, The Elgar Companion to Postkeynesian Economics (págs. 68-72). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishin Limited.spa
dc.relation.referencesLavoie, M. (2004). Post Keynesian consumer theory: potential synergies with consumer research and economic psychology. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 639-649.spa
dc.relation.referencesLavoie, M. (2005). René Roy, the Separability and Subordination of Needs, and Post Keynesian Consumer Theory. History of Economics Review, 42(1), 45-49. doi:10.1080/18386318.2005.11681212spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, F., & Keen, S. (2004). The Incoherent Emperor: A Heterodox Critique of Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory. Review of Social Economy, 62(2), 169-199. doi:10.1080/00346760410001684433spa
dc.relation.referencesLera, F. (1996). Teorías macroeconómicas explicativas del ahorro de las economías domésticas: situación actual de debate. Cuadernos de economía, 24, 91-117.spa
dc.relation.referencesLevin, J., & Milgrom, P. (2004). Consumer Theory. Recuperado el 10 de Agosto de 2020, de https://web.stanford.edu/~jdlevin/Econ%20202/Consumer%20Theory.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesLi, M., Patel, P., & Wolfe, M. (2019). A penny saved is a penny earned? Differences in male and female savings and consumption tradeoffs on online retail platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46, 79-86. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.019spa
dc.relation.referencesMankiw, G. (2013). Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarshall, A. (2013 [1890]). Principles of economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesMenger, C. (2007). Principles of political economy. Alabama: Ludwig Von Mises Institute.spa
dc.relation.referencesModigliani, F., & Brumberg, R. (1954). Utility analysis and the consumption function: an interpretation of cross-section data. En K. Kurihara, Post- Keynesian Economic (págs. 388–436). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J. M., Foxall, G., & Schrezenmaier, T. (2006). Consumer brand choice: Individual and group analyses of demand elasticity. Journal of Experimental Analysis of behavior, 85, 147-166.spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., & Foxall, G. (2016). Dimensions of demand elasticity. En G. Foxall, The Routledge Companion to Consumer Behavior Analysis (págs. 121-137). New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., & Foxall, G. (2017). Consumer Maximization of Utilitarian and Informational Reinforcement: Comparing Two Utility Measures with Reference to Social Class. Behavior analyst, 40, 457-474. doi:10.1007/s40614-017-0122-9spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., & Marques, R. (2017). Temporal discounting and marketing variables: effects of product prices and brand informational reinforcement. Behavior Analyst, 40, 475-492. doi:10.1007/s40614-017-0109-6spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., Cavalcanti, P., & Foxall, G. (2015). What consumers maximize: Brand choice as a function of utilitarian and informational reinforcement. Managerial and Decision Economics, 37(4-5), 360-371. doi:10.1002/mde.2722spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., Foxall, G., & James, V. (2008). Individual differences in price responsiveness within and across food brands. The Service Industry Journal, 28, 733-753. doi:10.1080/02642060801988605spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., Foxall, G., & Schrezenmaier, T. (2005). Patterns of consumer response to retail price differentials. The Service Industries Journal, 25(3), 309-335. doi:10.1080/02642060500050392spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., Foxall, G., & Wells, V. (2010). Consumer Brand Choice: Money Allocation as a Function of Brand Reinforcing Attributes. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(2), 161-175. doi:10.1080/01608061003756455spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira-Castro, J., Foxall, G., James, V., Pohl, R., Dias, M., & Chang, S. (2008). Consumer-based brand equity and brand performance. The Service Industries Journal, 28(4), 445-461. doi:10.1080/02642060801917554spa
dc.relation.referencesPapatla, P., & Krishnamurthi, L. (1992). A Probit Model of Choice Dynamics. Marketing Science, 11(2), 189-206. doi:10.1287/mksc.11.2.189spa
dc.relation.referencesPremack, D. (1962). Reversibility of the Reinforcement Relation. Science, New Series, 136(3512), 255-257.spa
dc.relation.referencesRachlin, H. (2004). The Science of self-control. United States of America: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaclin, H. (1989). Judgement, decision and choice. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesRandall, R., Peterson, G., Clarke, A., & Brown, T. (2003). Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 63-76. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00221-5spa
dc.relation.referencesRassuli, A., & Rassuli, K. (2015). The Realism of Post Keynesian Economics: A Marketing Perspective. 10(3), 455-473. doi:10.1080/01603477.1988.11489696spa
dc.relation.referencesRazek, Y. (2011). An Overview of Behavioral Finance and Revisiting the Behavioral Life Cycle Hypothesis. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(3), 7-24. Reed, D., & Kaplan, B. (2011). The Matching Law: A Tutorial for Practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4(2), 15-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobbins, L. (1952). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edition, London: Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesRomero, S., Foxall, G., Schrezenmaier, T., Oliveira-Castro, J., & James, V. (2006). Deviations from Matching in Consumer Choice. European Journal of behavior analysis, 7(1), 15-39. doi:10.1080/15021149.2006.11434261spa
dc.relation.referencesRoy, R. (1943). La hierarchie des besoins et la notion de groupes dans l’economie de choix. Econometrica, 13-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesSandoval-Escobar, M., & Medina, I. F. (2016). The behavioral perspective model in the Latin-American context: empirical and conceptual contributions. En G. Foxall, The Roultledge companion to consumer behavior analysis (págs. 213-227). New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesSelart, M., Karlsson, N., & Garling, T. (1997). Self-Control and loss Aversion in Intertemporal Choice. Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(5), 513-524.spa
dc.relation.referencesShavitt, S. (1989). Operationalizing functional theories of attitude. En A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. Greenwald, Attitude Structure and Function (págs. 311-337). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.spa
dc.relation.referencesShefrin, H., & Thaler, R. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. The Journal of Political economy, 89(2), 392-406.spa
dc.relation.referencesShefrin, H., & Thaler, R. (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Economic inquiry, 26, 609-643. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01520.xspa
dc.relation.referencesShefrin, H., & Thaler, R. (2004). Mental accounting, savings and self control. En C. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin, Advances in Behavioral economics (págs. 395-428). United Kingdom: Princeton University press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSigurdsson, V., Foxall, G., & Saevarsson, H. (2010). In-store experimental approach to pricing and consumer behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(3), 234-246. doi:10.1080/01608061.2010.499029spa
dc.relation.referencesSigurdsson, V., Kahamseh, S., Gunnarson, D., Larsen, N., & Foxall, G. (2013). An econometric examination of the behavioral perspective model in the context of Norwegian retailing. The psycological record, 63, 277-294. doi:10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.2.004spa
dc.relation.referencesSigurdsson, V., Larsen, N. M., & Gunnarsson, D. (2011). The behavioural economics of neutral and upward sloping demand curves in retailing. The Service Industries Journal, 31(15), 2543-2558. doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.531127spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, H. (1959). Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral sciences. American Economic Review, 49(3), 253-283.spa
dc.relation.referencesSkinner, B. (1953). Science ahd human behavior. Recuperado el 4 de Noviembre de 2019, de https://www.bfskinner.org/product/science-and-human-behavior-pdf/spa
dc.relation.referencesSkinner, B. (1966). What is the experimental analysis of behavior. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 9(3), 213-218. doi:10.1901/jeab.1966.9-213spa
dc.relation.referencesSweezy, A. (1934). The Interpretation of Subjective Value Theory in the Writings of the Austrian Economists. The Review of Economic Studies, 1(3), 176-185.spa
dc.relation.referencesSylvain Senecal, S., Kalczynski, P., & Nantel, J. (2005). Consumers’ decision-making process and their online shopping behavior: a clickstream analysis. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1599-1608.spa
dc.relation.referencesThaler, R. (2008). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 27(1), 15-25. doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330spa
dc.relation.referencesThaler, R. (2015). Todo lo que he aprendido con la psicología económica. Barcelona: Deusto.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimmerman, J., & Stewart, J. (2006). Extending the pedagogical attention given elasticity of demand in marketing. Journal of economics and finance education, 5(1), 14-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.spa
dc.relation.referencesTversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95(3), 371-384. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371spa
dc.relation.referencesVeblen, T. (1974). Teoría de la clase ociosa. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.spa
dc.relation.referencesWells, V. (2014). Behavioural psychology, marketing and consumer behaviour: a literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(11-12), 1119-1158. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2014.929161spa
dc.relation.referencesWells, V., Chang, S., Oliveira-Castro, J., & Pallister, J. (2010). Market Segmentation From a Behavioral Perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(2), 176-198. doi:10.1080/01608061003756505spa
dc.rightsDerechos reservados al autor, 2021spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psicología::158 - Psicología aplicadaspa
dc.subject.proposalModelo de perspectiva conductualspa
dc.subject.proposalEconomía postkeynesianaspa
dc.subject.proposalCiclo de vidaspa
dc.subject.proposalTeoría del consumidorspa
dc.subject.proposalThe behavioral perspective modeleng
dc.subject.proposalPost-keynesian economicseng
dc.subject.proposalLife cycle hypothesiseng
dc.subject.proposalConsumer theoryeng
dc.subject.unescoEducación del consumidor
dc.subject.unescoConsumer education
dc.subject.unescoComportamiento económico
dc.subject.unescoEconomic behaviour
dc.titleLa teoría económica y el modelo de perspectiva conductual: una aproximación experimental al efecto de los ingresos y precios sobre la elección del consumidorspa
dc.title.translatedEconomic theory and the behavioral perspective model: an approach to the experimental effect of prices and income on consumer choiceeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctoradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audienceEspecializadaspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
52816926.2020.pdf
Tamaño:
1.57 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Doctorado en Psicología

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: