Top Secret: propiedad intelectual y transformación de conocimiento para llevar un producto del laboratorio al mercado

dc.contributor.advisorDaza Caicedo, Sandraspa
dc.contributor.advisorGómez Morales, Yuri Jackspa
dc.contributor.authorFranco Forero, Carlos Davidspa
dc.contributor.researchgroupEstudios Sociales de la Ciencia, la Tecnología Y la Medicinaspa
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T13:51:04Z
dc.date.available2022-02-23T13:51:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficasspa
dc.description.abstractComo resultado de una investigación universitaria fue identificado un producto químico al parecer novedoso que promete tener una aplicación en la industria y un impacto en el mercado. Para capitalizarlo, la Universidad decidió hacerse propietaria de dicho producto mediante una solicitud de patente que eventualmente se puede licenciar. Este canal que parece conectar al laboratorio con el mercado está enmarcado en un modelo de innovación que desconoce todo el trabajo, incertidumbre y particularidades que se ciernen en la movilización de un producto específico desde un espacio académico hacia un espacio comercial. En primer lugar, se presentan algunos elementos que emergen de los Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la tecnología en relación con la propiedad intelectual, el ensamblaje de redes de interacción, los elementos que difuminan fronteras o se mueven a través de ellas y de la presencia del secreto en la circulación del conocimiento. En segundo lugar, se relata el seguimiento de un resultado de investigación universitaria patentado en el que se hacen visibles elementos contingentes como la negociación de una patente, las dificultades para avanzar en el estado de desarrollo y el uso de lo secreto. (Texto tomado de la fuente).spa
dc.description.abstractAs a result of a university investigation, an apparently novel chemical that promises to have an application in the industry and an impact on the market was identified. To capitalize on it, the University decided to become the owner of said product through a patent application that can eventually be licensed. This channel that seems to connect the laboratory with the market is framed in an innovation model that ignores all the work, uncertainty and particularities that loom in the mobilization of a specific product from an academic space to a commercial space. In the first place, some elements that emerge from the Social Studies of Science and technology are presented in relation to intellectual property, the assembly of interaction networks, the elements that blur borders or move through them and of presence of secrecy in the circulation of knowledge. Secondly, the follow-up of a patented university research result is told, in which contingent elements such as the negotiation of a patent, the difficulties to advance in the state of development and the use of secrecy become visible.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagíster en Estudios Sociales de La Cienciaspa
dc.description.notesIncluye anexosspa
dc.description.researchareaCiencia y políticaspa
dc.description.researchareaPolítica científica y tecnológicaspa
dc.format.extentxiii, 139 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81043
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.branchUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotáspa
dc.publisher.departmentDepartamento de Sociologíaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Humanasspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.publisher.programBogotá - Ciencias Humanas - Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Cienciaspa
dc.relation.referencesAkrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002). The Key To Success in Innovation Part I: the Art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 06(02), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919602000562spa
dc.relation.referencesAsdal, K., & Moser, I. (2012). Experiments in Context and Contexting. Science , Technology & Human Values, 37(4), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/41511177spa
dc.relation.referencesBagchi, A. K., & Bhattacharya, U. K. (1995). Indian patents as competitive instruments: Dream and reality. Economic And Political Weekly, 30(25), 1501–1511. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/4402913spa
dc.relation.referencesBazerman, C. (1997). Performatives constituting value: the case of patents. En The Construction of Professional Discourse (pp. 42–53).spa
dc.relation.referencesBiagioli, M. (2003). Rights or Rewards? Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship. Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, (January 2000), 253–279.spa
dc.relation.referencesBiagioli, M. (2006). Patent republic: Representing inventions, constructing rights and authors. Social Research, 73(4), 1129–1172.spa
dc.relation.referencesBiddle, J. B. (2014). Can patents prohibit research? On the social epistemology of patenting and licensing in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 45(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBirch, K. (2017). Techno-economic Assumptions. Science as Culture, 26(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1377389spa
dc.relation.referencesBorup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.77.2.8345056spa
dc.relation.referencesBowker, G. (1991). El auge de la investigación industrial. Historia de las ciencias, 527–551.spa
dc.relation.referencesBowker, G. (1992). What’s in a Patent? En Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 53–74).spa
dc.relation.referencesBowker, G., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. En The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3421475spa
dc.relation.referencesBozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719681001900104spa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M. (1986a). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint-Brieuc Bay. Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?, 196–223. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-2-49-90spa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M. (1986b). The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle. En Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19–34). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2spa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M. (1990). Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 132–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb03351.xspa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M. (1998). Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics. The Sociological Review, 46(1_suppl), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1998.tb03468.xspa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M., & Bowker, G. (1994). Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March. Science, Technology and Human values, 19(4), 395–424. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/689955spa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On Interests and Their Transformation : Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615–625.spa
dc.relation.referencesCallon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2011). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Inside Technology.spa
dc.relation.referencesCambrosio, A., Keating, P., & Mackenzie, M. (1990). Scientific Practice in the Courtroom : The Construction of Sociotechnical Identities in a Biotechnology Patent Dispute Published by : Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of Social Problems Stable URL : https://www.jstor.org/stab. Social Problems, 37(3), 275–293.spa
dc.relation.referencesCervantes García, J. A. (2018). Hacer agua bebible : Microtecnologías y bebedores en la Ciudad Blanca. 114.spa
dc.relation.referencesChien, C. V. (2016). Contextualizing patent disclosure. Vanderbilt Law Review, 69(6), 1849–1890.spa
dc.relation.referencesClancy, M. S., & Moschini, G. (2017). Intellectual Property Rights and the Ascent of Proprietary Innovation in Agriculture. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 9(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053524spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, H. (1985). Changing order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. En Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7323-591cspa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, H. (2010). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. En Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, H., & Yearly, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. En Science as practice and culture (pp. 301–326).spa
dc.relation.referencesColyvas, J. a., & Powell, W. W. (2006). Roads to institutionalization: the remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27, pp. 305–353.spa
dc.relation.referencesCristancho Escobar, F. A. (2017). La propiedad intelectual en los acuerdos adpic plus suscritos por Colombia: una visión desde la teoría económica de los derechos de propiedad. CES Derecho, 124–138. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesder.8.1.6spa
dc.relation.referencesCroissant, J. L. (2014). Agnotology: Ignorance and Absence or Towards a Sociology of Things That Aren’t There. Social Epistemology, 28(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.862880spa
dc.relation.referencesCroissant, J. L., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2008). Organizational contexts of science: Boundaries and relationships between university and industry. En The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 691–718).spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Laet, M. (2000). Patents, travel, space: Ethnographic encounters with objects in transit. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1068/d211tspa
dc.relation.referencesDe Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-171-228spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, Á. (2008). América Latina y el Caribe: La propiedad intelectual después de los tratados de libre comercio. En Cepal. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004spa
dc.relation.referencesEdgerton, D. (1999). From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology. History and Technology, 16, 111–136.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. Handbook of Qualitative Research, (28), 733–768.spa
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation : the Triple Helix of university - industry - government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026276308287spa
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H., & Webster, A. (1995). Science as intellectual property. En Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 480–505).spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, J. A. (2010). Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge. En Social Studies of Science (Vol. 40). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710379931spa
dc.relation.referencesFrickel, S. (2014). Not Here and Everywhere:The non-production of scientific knowledge. En Routledge Handbook of Science, Technology, and Society (pp. 263–276).spa
dc.relation.referencesFujimura, J. H. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation.” BT - Science as practice and culture. Science as practice and culture, (6), 168–214.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibbons, M. (1994). Introduction. En The New Production of Knowledge: Dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669366-1spa
dc.relation.referencesGieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science : Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists Author ( s ): Thomas F . Gieryn Source : American Sociological Review , Vol . 48 , No . 6 ( Dec ., 1983 ), pp . 781-795 Publishe. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.spa
dc.relation.referencesGieryn, T. F. (1995). Boundaries of Science. En Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 393–443).spa
dc.relation.referencesGodin, Benoît. (2016). Technological innovation: On the origins and development of an inclusive concept. Technology and Culture, 57(3), 527–556. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2016.0070spa
dc.relation.referencesGodin, Benoit, & Vinck, D. (2017). Critical studies of innovation : alternative approaches to the pro-innovation bias. Edward Elgar.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Morales, Y. J. (2007). science / non-science and boundary work. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 4079–4082.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez Uranga, M., López Gómez, M. del S., & Araujo de la Mata, A. (2008). Los ADPIC Plus en los actuales tratados bilaterales impulsados por Estados Unidos y consecuencias en los países en desarrollo. Revista de Economía Mundial, 20, 23–48.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Gélvez, D. M., & Jaime, A. (2013). El patentamiento Universitario en Colombia. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(SPL.ISS.3), 233–345. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242013000300050spa
dc.relation.referencesGraeber, D. (2017). Trabajos de mierda, una teoría. https://doi.org/10.15446/mag.v33n1.82995spa
dc.relation.referencesGuston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: The role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary Organization. Social Studies of Science, 29(1), 87–111.spa
dc.relation.referencesHall, B. H., & Harhoff, D. (2012). Recent Research on the Economics of Patents. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-111008spa
dc.relation.referencesHarper, R. (1998). Inside the IMF: An Etnography of Documents, Technology and Organisational Action.spa
dc.relation.referencesHéder, M. (2017). From NASA to EU: The evolution of the TRL scale in Public Sector Innovation. Innovation Journal, 22(2), 1–23.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeimer, C. A. (2012). Inert facts and the illusion of knowledge: Strategic uses of ignorance in HIV clinics. Economy and Society, 41(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.637332spa
dc.relation.referencesHeller, M. A., Eisenberg, R. S., Science, S., Series, N., May, N., Heller, M. A., & Eisenberg, R. S. (1998). Can Patents Deter Innovation ? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science, 280(5364), 698–701. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/2895332spa
dc.relation.referencesHirsch, E. (2010). Property and persons: New forms and contests in the Era of Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105036spa
dc.relation.referencesJacobsson, B. (2000). Standardization and expert knowledge. En A World of Standards (p. 40.49).spa
dc.relation.referencesJensen, R. A. (2016). University–Industry Linkages in the Support of Biotechnology Discoveries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 8(1), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095400spa
dc.relation.referencesKang, H. Y. (2019). Patents as Assets: Intellectual Property Rights as Market Subjects and Objects. En Turning Things into Assets: New Lineaments in the Study of Technoscientific Capitalism (pp. 1–33).spa
dc.relation.referencesKleinman, D. L. (1998). Untangling Context : Understanding a University Laboratory in the Commercial World. Science, Technology and Human Values, 23(3), 285–314.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to follow scientists.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B. (1999). La esperanza de Pandora: los estudios de la ciencia. En Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004spa
dc.relation.referencesLatour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). La vida en el laboratorio. En Alianza Editorial.spa
dc.relation.referencesLave, R., Mirowski, P., & Randalls, S. (2010). Introduction: STS and Neoliberal science. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710378549spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. En After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481141spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J. (2010). The Materials of STS. (April 2009).spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, J., & Lien, M. E. (2013). Slippery: Field notes in empirical ontology. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712456947spa
dc.relation.referencesLizarazo-Cortés, Ó., & Lamprea Bermúdez, N. (2014). Implementación del procedimiento acelerado de patentes (PPH) en Colombia. Análisis jurídico, técnico y efectos iniciales. Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial, 0(18), 281–321.spa
dc.relation.referencesLynch, M., & Jordan, K. (2000). Patents, Promotions, and Protocols: Mapping and Claiming Scientific Territory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(1–2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2000.9677651spa
dc.relation.referencesLynch, M., & Rabinow, P. (1997). Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. En The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3034054spa
dc.relation.referencesMol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions (pp. 74–89). pp. 74–89.spa
dc.relation.referencesMol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice. En Science and Cultural Theory. Durham and London: Duke University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoser, P. (2016). Patents and Innovation in Economic History. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015136spa
dc.relation.referencesMurray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1389–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00070-7spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, G. (1995). From Discovery to Invention : The Writing and Rewriting of Two Patents. Social Studies of Science, 25(1), 57–105.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, G. (1996). Strategic vagueness in academic writing. En Academic Writing: Intercultural and textual issues (p. 14).spa
dc.relation.referencesNagaoka, S., Motohashi, K., & Goto, A. (2010). Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. En Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1083–1127). North-Holland.spa
dc.relation.referencesNowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). ‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.spa
dc.relation.referencesPacker, K., & Webster, A. (1995). Inventing Boundaries : The Prior Art of the Social World. Social Studies of Science, 25(1), 107–117.spa
dc.relation.referencesPacker, K., & Webster, A. (1996). Patenting Culture in Science : Reinventing the Scientific Wheel of Credibility. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(4), 427–453.spa
dc.relation.referencesPfotenhauer, S. M., & Juhl, J. (2017). Innovation and the political state: beyond the myth of technologies and markets. En Benoit Godin & D. Vinck (Eds.), Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias (pp. 68–93). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367229spa
dc.relation.referencesPolanyi, M. (1966). The tacit Dimension (2009 by Am). Chicago: University of Chicaco Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPopp Berman, E. (2008). Why did universities start patenting?: Institution-building and the road to the bayh-dole act. Social Studies of Science, 38(6), 835–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708098605spa
dc.relation.referencesPrasad, A. (2007). The (Amorphous) anatomy of an invention: The case of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Social Studies of Science, 37(4), 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706075334spa
dc.relation.referencesPrior, L. (2004). Documents. En Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 345–360).spa
dc.relation.referencesProctor, R. (2008). Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study). En The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance (pp. 1–36). https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839404263spa
dc.relation.referencesRaigoso Camelo, C. E. (2018). En las Fronteras del Glifosato: Asociaciones en juego y el juego de las asociaciones. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesRappert, B., & Balmer, B. (2007). Rethinking ‘Secrecy’ and ‘Disclosure’: What Science and Technology Studies Can Offer Attempts to Govern WMD Threats. En Technology and Security: Governing Threats in the New Millennium (pp. 45–65).spa
dc.relation.referencesRappert, B., & Webster, A. (1997). Regimes of ordering: The commercialization of intellectual property in industrial-academic collaborations. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 9(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329708524274spa
dc.relation.referencesRenault, C. S. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6108-xspa
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo Forero, O. (2004). Retórica de la ciencia sin “retórica” Sobre autores, comunidades y contextos. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 23(23), 251–268.spa
dc.relation.referencesRiles, A. (2010). Collateral expertise legal knowledge in the global financial markets. Current Anthropology, 51(6), 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1086/657627spa
dc.relation.referencesRip, A. (1986). Mobilising Resources Through Texts. En Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 84–99).spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, M. C., & Mantilla, W. P. (2013). De la creatividad a la innovación, de la innovación a la propiedad intelectual. Revista de la propiedad inmaterial, 17, 283–324.spa
dc.relation.referencesShapin, S. (1984). Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology. Social Studies of Science, 14(4), 481–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014004001spa
dc.relation.referencesShapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. En Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/354315spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science Technology and Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624spa
dc.relation.referencesStar, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology , ’ Translations ’ and Boundary Objects : Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley ’ s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology , 1907-39 Author ( s ): Susan Leigh Star and James R . Griesemer Source : Social Studies of Science , Vol . 19 , No . 3. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009). REGRESO SOBRE LA NOCIÓN DE OBJETO FRONTERA. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 3(1), 4–26.spa
dc.relation.referencesTurner, S. (2001). What is the problem with experts? Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 123–149.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Lente, H., & Rip, A. (s/f). CHAPTER VII Expectations in technological developments: An example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency. 1–25.spa
dc.relation.referencesWirtén, E. H. (2015). The Patent and the paper: A few thoughts on late modern science and intellectual property. Culture Unbound, 7(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1573600spa
dc.relation.referencesWoodmansee, M., & Jaszi, P. (2003). Beyond Authorship Refiguring Rights in Traditional Culture and Bioknowledge. En Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science.spa
dc.relation.referencesWoolgar, S., & Lezaun, J. (2013). The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713488820spa
dc.relation.referencesZukerfeld, M. (2011). Las regulaciones del acceso a los conocimientos en el período preindustrial. Introducción a una sociología histórica de la propiedad intelectual. Redes, 17(32), 17–37.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias socialesspa
dc.subject.proposalPropiedad intelectualspa
dc.subject.proposalPatentesspa
dc.subject.proposalConocimientospa
dc.subject.proposalSecretosspa
dc.subject.proposalInteresamientospa
dc.subject.proposalOntologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalIntellectual propertyeng
dc.subject.proposalPatentseng
dc.subject.proposalKnowledgeeng
dc.subject.proposalSecretseng
dc.subject.proposalInteressementeng
dc.subject.proposalOntologyeng
dc.subject.proposalTransferencia de tecnologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalTechnology transfereng
dc.subject.unescoPropiedad intelectualspa
dc.subject.unescoIntellectual propertyeng
dc.subject.unescoMarketingspa
dc.subject.unescoMarketingeng
dc.subject.unescoSociología del conocimientospa
dc.subject.unescoSociology of knowledgeeng
dc.titleTop Secret: propiedad intelectual y transformación de conocimiento para llevar un producto del laboratorio al mercadospa
dc.title.translatedTop Secret: intellectual property and knowledge transformation to bring a product from the laboratory to the marketeng
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPúblico generalspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
80074410.2021.pdf
Tamaño:
1.8 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: