Política y pluralismo: un diálogo entre Hannah Arendt y John Rawls
Cargando...
Archivos
Autores
Rodríguez Ibagón, Jhair Alexander
Director
Tipo de contenido
Document language:
Español
Fecha
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Documentos PDF
Resumen
En el presente trabajo hago un balance entre las concepciones de lo político de Hannah Arendt y John Rawls. Sobre esa base, reviso la posición de estos dos autores respecto del pluralismo. En primer lugar, señalo los aspectos básicos de la noción de pluralismo en la concepción de lo político de Arendt. Hago esto teniendo en cuenta el análisis de su distinción entre vita activa y vita contemplativa. En segundo lugar, analizo los principales aspectos de la propuesta política de Rawls. Centro la atención en los conceptos de “imparcialidad” y “razonabilidad” como nociones nucleares de su concepción de lo político en Liberalismo político (2011). Abordo la noción de pluralismo razonable junto con tres de las críticas que se hicieron a la concepción rawlsiana de pluralismo. Finalmente, contrasto las dos posiciones en un diálogo que destaca las diferencias entre los planteamientos de estos dos autores y doy razones para optar por las ideas de Arendt acerca de lo político.
Abstract. In this work I make a balance between the conceptions of politics by Hannah Arendt y John Rawls. To accomplish this purpose, I review their position with respect to pluralism. First, I point out the basic aspects related to pluralism in the political conception of Arendt. I do this by taking into account the analysis of the distinction between vita activa and vita contemplativa. Second, I analyze the main aspects of the Rawl´s political proposal. I focus on the concepts of “impartiality” and “reasonability” as nuclear notions in their conception on politics in Political Liberalism (2011). I approach the notion of reasonable pluralism and three critics that were made to the rawlsean conception of pluralism. Finally, I contrast both Arendt´s and Rawls´s positions in a dialogue that shows the differences between the approaches of these two authors, and I give reasons for choosing Arendt´s ideas about politics.
Abstract. In this work I make a balance between the conceptions of politics by Hannah Arendt y John Rawls. To accomplish this purpose, I review their position with respect to pluralism. First, I point out the basic aspects related to pluralism in the political conception of Arendt. I do this by taking into account the analysis of the distinction between vita activa and vita contemplativa. Second, I analyze the main aspects of the Rawl´s political proposal. I focus on the concepts of “impartiality” and “reasonability” as nuclear notions in their conception on politics in Political Liberalism (2011). I approach the notion of reasonable pluralism and three critics that were made to the rawlsean conception of pluralism. Finally, I contrast both Arendt´s and Rawls´s positions in a dialogue that shows the differences between the approaches of these two authors, and I give reasons for choosing Arendt´s ideas about politics.